Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

NY school district finds electric buses cost 9 times more than diesel

Published

on

NY school district finds electric buses cost 9 times more than diesel

School districts in several states are facing mandates to incorporate electric buses into their school bus fleets, with the EVs bringing with them different operating costs and posing new challenges.

Several states, including New York and California, have implemented requirements that school districts buy zero-emission school buses with their new purchases. New York’s rule takes effect in 2027 for all new school bus purchases and has a fleet-wide goal of 2035 for the transition, while California’s new purchase mandate will take effect in 2035 with five-year extensions available for rural school districts.

Advertisement

Some school districts are getting ahead of the mandates and are experimenting with electric school buses and a new report on the operating costs shows that electric school buses pose different challenges for school districts than diesel school buses.

NEW YORK PARENTS SAY KIDS ‘FREEZE’ ON MANDATED ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUSES DURING BRUTAL WINTER WEATHER

Electric school buses charging

Electric school buses pose new operational challenges for school districts transitioning their diesel school bus fleets. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

report by News10NBC of Rochester, New York, examined the financial impact of the Naples Central School District’s experience with electric buses, as the district used federal grants to buy two electric buses and related infrastructure that have now been in use for almost two full school years.

Transportation director and head mechanic Pat Elwell told News10NBC that the EVs that consumers drive as personal vehicles are “ahead of the curve” while electric buses “are not” because the “technology is not there, the batteries are not there.”

Advertisement

ARCTIC BLAST FUELS SCRUTINY OF BIDEN’S $8B ELECTRIC BUS PUSH AS WATCHDOGS CITE OVERSIGHT FAILURES

Bus driver

Electric buses offered a smoother ride and performed better going up hills, according to the report. (David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

He said that the district’s drivers report that the electric buses perform better in some respects, such as getting up hills and offering a smoother ride. However, he cautioned that performance is dependent on the temperature as they work best between 20 and 80 degrees, but temperatures outside that range can impact battery life.

Elwell told the outlet that about half of the time this winter, the district opted against using the electric buses since about 20% of their battery charge was going to heating the vehicles and that required a midday recharge to ensure they had sufficient battery for their afternoon routes.

ELECTRIC BUSES ARE SITTING UNUSED IN CITIES ACROSS THE US; HERE’S WHY

Advertisement
Kids getting on bus in the snow

The report noted that electric buses struggle to maintain their batteries in cold and hot temperatures outside the 20 to 80 degree range. (iStock)

The outlet asked about how electric buses compare to diesel school buses in terms of operating costs, and Elwell said the district pays about 36 cents per mile to operate its diesel buses – which he noted is relatively stable because the district can buy fuel through state contracts.

“The electric on the other hand is all over the place because you never know from month to month what it’s going to be, so by the time you start factoring in your kilowatt-hour for the supply and the delivery and all the other charges just the same as you would for your diesel bill, we’re paying $3.18 per mile for an electric bus,” he told News10NBC.

Superintendent Kevin Swartz told the outlet that the difference in costs between an electric bus and a diesel bus is about $300,000 and that because of that differential, the district doesn’t have plans to buy additional electric buses at this time.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Advertisement

Swartz said in the report that Naples is a “relatively small district who replaces two buses a year. Typically, that’s $600,000 in additional monies that the taxpayers would have to come up with and that’s exclusive of any charging or infrastructure upgrades we’d have to bring in if we went any further.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Form DEF 14A CSB BANCORP INC /OH For: 16 March

Published

on


Form DEF 14A CSB BANCORP INC /OH For: 16 March

Continue Reading

Business

Oil Price Today (March 17): Crude oil gains 2%, at $103 as Strait of Hormuz tensions linger. Experts weigh in

Published

on

Oil Price Today (March 17): Crude oil gains 2%, at $103 as Strait of Hormuz tensions linger. Experts weigh in
Crude oil prices climbed more than 2% on Tuesday, bouncing back from losses posted in the previous session as concerns over supply resurfaced with the Strait of Hormuz largely shut and U.S. allies declining calls to deploy warships to escort tankers through the key shipping route.

European nations have declined to deploy warships to the Strait of Hormuz, even as US President Donald Trump warned that NATO could face “a very bad future” if member countries do not step in to help reopen the crucial shipping route.

Crude oil price on March 17

Brent crude futures rose $2.48, or 2.5%, to $102.69 per barrel at 0058 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude gained $2.42, or 2.6%, to $95.92 per barrel.The Strait of Hormuz, a key chokepoint that handles about 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas trade, has been largely disrupted by the US-Israel war on Iran, which has now entered its third week. The disruption has heightened fears of supply shortages, rising energy costs and higher inflation.

Advertisement

Several U.S. allies also pushed back against Donald Trump’s request on Monday to send warships to escort shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The move drew criticism from the U.S. president, who accused Western partners of ingratitude despite decades of American support.
The effective closure of the strait has forced the United Arab Emirates, the third-largest producer in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, to shut in production. As a result, its output has fallen by more than half, two sources told Reuters.
Meanwhile, the head of the International Energy Agency said member countries could release more oil to help ease rising energy costs, in addition to the 400 million barrels they have already agreed to draw from strategic reserves.

Where are prices headed?

Experts say oil prices could climb further if geopolitical tensions persist. Global crude prices may rise to $120 per barrel in the near term and could even reach $150 per barrel if the war continues for more than a month and tensions in West Asia remain elevated, according to Kayanat Chainwala, Assistant Vice President at Kotak Securities.

She added that crude prices below $110 per barrel can largely be managed within India’s current tax framework, giving the government some flexibility to absorb the impact.

However, if prices move into the $110 to $125 per barrel range, fiscal flexibility would start to tighten and earnings divergence across companies in the oil and gas sector could widen, says Elara Securities.

If crude prices climb above $125 per barrel, broader stress could emerge in the system. Earnings of oil marketing companies may weaken sharply, LPG subsidy burdens could rise significantly, and risks to LNG throughput may increase. In such a situation, the chances of policy intervention would also grow, it added.

Advertisement

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Investar holding director Jordan buys $41k in shares

Published

on


Investar holding director Jordan buys $41k in shares

Continue Reading

Business

How to Select the Right Industrial Adhesive for Manufacturing

Published

on

How to Select the Right Industrial Adhesive for Manufacturing

Manufacturing depends on reliable bonding to keep products strong, stable, and durable. Industrial adhesives play a key role in modern assembly because they help manufacturers create secure connections while maintaining efficient production.

When used correctly, they can improve product quality, support cleaner assembly, and contribute to more consistent manufacturing outcomes.

However, selecting the right adhesive requires careful consideration. Not every adhesive performs the same way, and choosing the wrong one can affect product reliability, production efficiency, and long-term performance.

Read on to learn how to select the right industrial adhesive for manufacturing and make more confident decisions for your production process.

Review Application Method and Production Efficiency

The adhesive should integrate smoothly with the existing manufacturing process. Application techniques and curing requirements influence both consistency and production speed.

Advertisement

The following factors help manufacturers select an adhesive that supports efficient assembly operations.

Dispensing method

Adhesives may be applied through manual applicators, automated dispensers, or precision spray systems. Each method requires a product with the correct viscosity and flow behavior. An adhesive that dispenses evenly helps maintain consistent bead size, accurate placement, and minimal material waste across large production runs.

Curing process

Different adhesives cure under different conditions, including room temperature, heat, pressure, or ultraviolet light. Production facilities must confirm that their equipment can support the curing method required for the selected adhesive. Many manufacturers also consult adhesive specialists when evaluating curing requirements.

Working with experienced suppliers such as directadhesives.co.uk or another trusted industrial adhesive provider can help identify products that align with available curing systems and production schedules. Their guidance often helps prevent delays caused by incompatible curing conditions.

Advertisement

Working time

Working time refers to how long the adhesive remains usable after application before curing begins. Assembly lines that involve multiple positioning steps may require longer open times to allow proper alignment of components. Shorter working times may suit high-speed automated lines where parts are positioned immediately after dispensing.

Understand the Materials Being Bonded

Material compatibility strongly influences adhesive performance. Different substrates interact with adhesives in unique ways, affecting how well a bond forms and how long it lasts.

Here are the factors that help manufacturers assess whether an adhesive will perform reliably with specific materials.

Substrate type

Each material responds differently to adhesive formulations. Metals such as steel or aluminum often bond well with structural epoxies or acrylics, while plastics, rubber, and composites may require adhesives designed specifically for those surfaces. Understanding the material composition helps narrow product choices and reduces the risk of weak or inconsistent bonding.

Advertisement

Surface energy

Surface energy affects how easily an adhesive spreads across a material. High surface energy materials like aluminum, stainless steel, and glass typically allow adhesives to wet and bond effectively. Low surface energy plastics such as polyethylene or polypropylene resist adhesive spread, which may require primers, surface treatments, or adhesives formulated for these substrates.

Surface condition

The condition of the bonding surface has a direct impact on adhesion strength. Contaminants such as oil, dust, oxidation, and protective coatings can interfere with proper bonding. Cleaning, abrasion, or other preparation methods help create a more stable surface, allowing the adhesive to contact the material evenly.

Evaluate Environmental and Operating Conditions

Adhesives must retain their performance after assembly, even when exposed to demanding environments. Temperature fluctuations, from extreme heat to cold storage, can affect the structural integrity of a bond. Selecting adhesives rated for the expected temperature range ensures that bonds remain strong and reliable throughout the product’s lifecycle.

In addition to temperature, chemical exposure plays a critical role in bond durability. Contact with fuels, oils, solvents, or cleaning agents can weaken certain adhesives, causing them to degrade prematurely. Choosing chemical-resistant formulations helps maintain long-term performance, especially in industrial or automotive applications where exposure is frequent.

Advertisement

Moisture and physical stress also influence adhesive effectiveness. Products used outdoors or in high-humidity settings require adhesives that resist water penetration and prevent bond failure.

Consider Strength, Flexibility, and Performance Requirements

After evaluating materials and environmental conditions, it is essential to define the mechanical demands of the adhesive. High bond strength ensures that components under stress, including tensile and shear forces, remain firmly secured. Choosing an appropriate formulation helps maintain structural stability and prevents early failure under load.

Equally important is the ability of the adhesive to tolerate movement. Parts that expand, contract, or experience minor shifts during use require adhesives that adapt without breaking or losing adhesion. Flexible formulations absorb stress and extend the service life of bonded assemblies.

Additionally, surface irregularities and production timing influence performance. Adhesives that fill gaps or uneven surfaces provide a uniform connection, reducing potential weak spots.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right industrial adhesive requires careful evaluation of several factors. Materials, operating conditions, mechanical performance, and production methods all influence which adhesive will perform best. A thorough assessment allows manufacturers to narrow their options and select adhesives designed for their specific application.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Video shows Tesla nearly drive mom and baby off bridge, lawsuit claims

Published

on

Video shows Tesla nearly drive mom and baby off bridge, lawsuit claims

A Houston woman sued Tesla last month after she says her Cybertruck, allegedly operating in self-driving mode, was captured on camera nearly sending her and her infant off a bridge before ultimately crashing into an overpass barrier. 

The woman, who claims she suffered multiple injuries in the August 2025 incident, is suing Tesla for $1 million in a liability and negligence case, according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

“On August 18, 2025, our client Justine Saint Amour was driving her Tesla Cybertruck on Houston’s 69 Eastex Freeway with autopilot engaged,” Attorney Bob Hilliard said in a statement to FOX Business.

“Something terrifying happened, without warning, the vehicle attempted to drive straight off an overpass.”

ELON MUSK REVEALS PRICE OF TESLA’S CYBERCAB

destroyed black cybertruck on highway

A Tesla Cybertruck was destroyed in an autopilot-related crash in Houston, a lawsuit claims. (Hilliard Law / Fox News)

In the dashcam video of the incident, driver Justine Saint Amour was in a Cybertruck that was expected to follow a right-hand curve of a Y-shaped overpass. 

Advertisement

The car then appeared to barely turn, continuing straight ahead, before violently crashing into a concrete barrier on the overpass. As it ricocheted from the impact, parts of the vehicle were seen flying off.

Amour’s attorney added that just before the crash, she disengaged the driver-assistance feature and tried to take control of the wheel. However, the vehicle was already too far in motion for any intervention to be effective, the law firm indicated. 

“She tried to take control, but crashed into the barrier and was seriously injured (mostly her shoulder, neck, and back),” Hilliard said. 

Saint Amour suffered serious injuries to her right shoulder, neck and back, including two herniated discs in her lower back and one in her neck, the Austin American-Statesman reported, citing Hilliard Law. Saint Amour also sprained the tendons in her wrist and suffered nerve damage to her right hand, which can cause numbness, a burning sensation and overall weakness, the lawsuit claimed. 

Advertisement

Local outlet Khou 11 added that her 1-year-old child was also in the backseat during the incident but was unharmed.

TESLA DODGES CALIFORNIA LICENSE SUSPENSION AFTER DROPPING MISLEADING ‘AUTOPILOT’ MARKETING TERMS

gif of dashcam video showing car crashing into overpass barrier

Dashcam video captured a Cybertruck reportedly on autopilot driving directly toward an overpass barrier, according to a lawsuit. (Hilliard Law / Fox News)

The lawsuit alleged that Tesla misrepresented the capabilities of its driver-assistance system and was negligent in the design of its “Autopilot” feature. It also claimed that the company failed to incorporate safety mechanisms such as more effective emergency braking systems or liDAR, a sensing technology that measures distances.

“Tesla’s self driving relies on cheap video cameras alone, with no LiDar,” Hilliard said. “The vehicle also lacks a proper driver alert system to ensure drivers are ready to take over driving.”

Advertisement

Hilliard Law posted a statement on social media last Wednesday, saying “Tesla could have avoided all of this by not cutting corners.”  

“Tesla’s decisions made Justine’s accident inevitable,” Hilliard added. “This company wants drivers to believe and trust their life on a lie: that the vehicle can self-drive and that it can do so safely. It can’t, and it doesn’t.”

The lawsuit, filed in Harris County District Court, comes as Tesla was recently forced to comply with California regulations over false advertising claims related to its “Autopilot” feature. 

The case, filed by the California DMV in 2022, alleged that Tesla misleadingly marketed its advanced driver assistance systems as autonomous driving technology under the names “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving.”

Advertisement
app footage of cybertruck driving

The crash happened on Aug. 18, 2025, in Houston, Texas.  (HIlliard Law / Fox News)

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

While the automaker attempted to challenge the ruling, it ultimately adjusted the system’s “Navigate on Autopilot” name to “Navigate on Autosteer,” among other rebranding changes.  

Tesla’s shift is part of a high-stakes effort to protect its business while aggressively expanding its fleet of Robotaxi services, including the recent launch of the Cybercab — a fully autonomous ride-hailing vehicle designed without a steering wheel, pedals or any physical controls. 

FOX Business reached out to Tesla for comment, but did not hear back.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Fuel suppliers hauled in for explanation over prices

Published

on

Fuel suppliers hauled in for explanation over prices

Fuel suppliers will have “the book thrown at them” if they are found to be profiteering off the conflict in the Middle East, the government says.

Continue Reading

Business

Ex-Wallaby-backed oat mill approved

Published

on

Ex-Wallaby-backed oat mill approved

An assessment panel spent only 10 minutes to approve an oat mill in Oakford, a multi-million-dollar project backed by former international rugby player Dane Haylett-Petty.

Continue Reading

Business

Form 4 Target Corporation For: 16 March

Published

on


Form 4 Target Corporation For: 16 March

Continue Reading

Business

Amanda Healy sheds light on next moves for Warrikal

Published

on

Amanda Healy sheds light on next moves for Warrikal

The co-founder and former chief executive of WA’s largest Indigenous-owned contractor Warrikal, Amanda Healy, has opened up on the challenges facing its future.

Continue Reading

Business

AI firm Anthropic seeks weapons expert to stop users from ‘misuse’

Published

on

AI firm Anthropic seeks weapons expert to stop users from 'misuse'

A similar position has been advertised by ChatGPT developer OpenAI. On its careers website, it lists a job vacancy for a researcher in “biological and chemical risks”, with a salary of up to $455,000 (£335,000), almost double that offered by Anthropic.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025