West Country practice BLB Solicitors has ceased trading and all its staff have been made redundant

A West Country law firm has ceased trading after a deal to rescue the business collapsed. BLB Solicitors was founded more than a decade ago and had offices across Bath, Bristol, Swindon, Almondsbury, Trowbridge and Bradford-on-Avon.

It is understood the legal practice appointed administrators from The Insolvency Company, part of Sumer Group, at the end of April, but a deal to sell of the firm failed.

Before the company’s collapse, Business Live understands administrators worked with BLB’s leadership team to explore options to save the business and protect jobs. But despite an agreement in principle, the potential buyer withdrew and all staff were made redundant, the administrators said.

Joint administrator Gareth Buckley, head of insolvency at The Insolvency Company, said: “We worked hard to secure a sale of the business as a going concern, which would have preserved a significant number of jobs, and we had a deal in place.

“It is deeply disappointing that it fell through at a late stage. Due to the timing and lack of available funding there was no alternative other than to cease trading and dismiss the workforce. Our immediate priority now is to ensure clients and creditors are kept informed and to support employees through the process of making claims to the Redundancy Payments Service.”

Business Live understands that because the administrators are not solicitors, under Solicitor Regulation Authority (SRA) rules it was not possible to trade the firm whilst seeking a new buyer. The firm has been shut permanently and will not be reopening, according to its website.

The administrators are now looking to sell BLB’s assets and have said they will “contact creditors in due course” with further information regarding the progress of the administration.

“The Insolvency Company is liaising closely with the SRA to ensure that the interests of the clients of the firm are safeguarded during this process,” the administrators said in a statement.

“The joint administrators will continue to work closely with all stakeholders to support a smooth transition and deliver the best possible outcome for creditors, employees and clients of the firm.”

The SRA has appointed law firm Stephensons Solicitors LLP to collect files belonging to former BLB clients and keep them safe. Any enquiries regarding BLB should be directed to interventions@stephensons.co.uk.

A threat from hedge fund Citadel to put a halt to its $6 billion Midtown Manhattan offices over a tax proposal from Mayor Zohran Mamdani threatens area food vendors’ dwindling business, vendors told FOX Business.

The fund, founded by Ken Griffin in 1990, made the threat after Mamdani directly targeted Griffin while announcing a new tax on second homes in the city.

“This is an annual fee on luxury properties worth more than $5 million, whose owners do not live full-time in the city. Like for this penthouse, which hedge fund CEO Ken Griffin bought for $238 million,” Mamdani said in a video announcing the new tax. 

Griffin, whose $51 billion net worth places him in the top 35 of the world’s richest people, slammed Mamdani’s video as a “personal attack” and claimed it showed a “profound lack of judgment.”

The feud could put an end to a project that would build New York’s second-tallest building and inject billions in construction dollars into the local economy. 

Following Mamdani’s April 15 video, Citadel COO Gerald Beeson hinted that a plan to move forward with a skyline project for Citadel at 350 Park Avenue may not go forward.

MAMDANI TAX BREAK PROPOSAL SPARKS FEARS AS BUSINESS LEADERS WARN OF ‘FRAGILE’ NYC ECONOMY

“We are about to commence the redevelopment of 350 Park Avenue, creating 6,000 highly paid construction jobs and supporting the creation of more than 15,000 permanent jobs in Midtown New York,” Beeson wrote in an April 23 memo to employees. 

“The project – if we move forward – will entail more than $6 billion dollars of spending,” he also wrote. The “if” in Beeson’s memo could bear significant weight.

The 62-story skyscraper sitting near the center of Midtown Manhattan’s Turtle Bay neighborhood could be a boon, not only to the city’s construction and finance sectors, but also to local food vendors who have been struggling since the COVID-19 pandemic wiped out Midtown’s foot traffic. 

O’LEARY SLAMS NYC TAX PLAN AS ‘SHEER BLIND STUPIDITY,’ DEFENDS WEALTHY INVESTORS

“If the owner brings more people, it’s gonna be a lot of business. Like, about now, this time is supposed to be easier,” Maria, who runs the Eggstravaganza food truck on the corner of Park and E. 52nd Street, told FOX Business. 

“Before the pandemic it was like, I couldn’t even talk to you right now,” she said, speaking to FOX Business shortly after noon. “But now everything changed. A lot of companies are moving to different places. A lot of companies moved to SoHo, different places… Hudson Yards, a lot of people.”

Maria referenced a number of factors for the decline in her customer volume, including the 2025 shooting at 345 Park Avenue that prompted Blackstone to temporarily shutter its offices and have over 3,000 employees work from home. 

“So if this building brings in a lot of customers, that would definitely help.” 

But if Citadel follows through on its threat, it could pull a much-needed capital influx from the area.

“Canceling such a business, of course, will affect our business as well because we depend on the traffic from the people around here,” Ash, who worked in Rafiqi’s food truck right next to Maria’s, told FOX Business.

His business, which he’s been running in Manhattan for 25 years, is going through a downturn. 

“Prices went up, it follows the new government here… it affects us a lot,” Ash said. “The international situation, the war in Iran, affects us as well. Everything goes up. It’s hard for us. We have to keep our prices as well, we can’t change a lot of our prices,” Ash added. 

“When the businesses left, we all suffered,” a vendor who ran a Greek halal cart on 51st Street told FOX Business. “Many friends had to go back home to their countries,” the vendor, who asked to remain anonymous, said. 

Mamdani appeared to slightly soften his attacks on Griffin, even thanking the Citadel head for funding a police memorial. 

“I also want to thank Ken Griffin for funding a memorial wall that will open later this year,” Mamdani said.

Griffin recently met with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul at the end of April to discuss the “future direction of New York” amid Mamdani’s tax proposals.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

FOX Business reached out to representatives for Mamdani, Hochul and Citadel for additional comment. 

The national average price for regular gasoline surged above $4.50 per gallon Wednesday, as ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran continued to pressure fuel costs for American drivers.

AAA reported the national average for regular gas at $4.536 as of Wednesday, up more than five cents from Tuesday’s $4.483 average.

The highest recorded was $5.016 for June 14, 2022, according to gasprices.aaa.com. That took place during Joe Biden’s presidency.

The AAA California average price for regular gas as of Wednesday is a whopping $6.16, towering over all the other states.

NATIONAL AVERAGE GAS PRICE REACHES $4.45 BEFORE SUMMER DRIVING SEASON

Oklahoma, Mississippi and Louisiana remained just under the $4 mark, with AAA averages of $3.962, $3.97 and $3.993, respectively.

Several states were averaging more than $5 per gallon for regular fuel, including Alaska at $5.188, Nevada at $5.233, Oregon at $5.332, Hawaii at $5.657 and Washington at $5.747.

CHEVRON CEO SAYS ECONOMIES ‘ARE GOING TO HAVE TO SLOW’ AS STRAIT OF HORMUZ CLOSURE DISRUPTS OIL SUPPLY

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House on Wednesday.

The U.S. has been engaged in a blockade against Iran for more than three weeks.

AAA NATIONAL AVERAGE GAS PRICE SOARS ABOUT 33 CENTS IN A WEEK

President Donald Trump said in a Tuesday evening Truth Social post that Project Freedom, described as “The Movement of Ships through the Strait of Hormuz,” would be paused briefly while negotiations continue.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

“Based on the request of Pakistan and other Countries, the tremendous Military Success that we have had during the Campaign against the Country of Iran and, additionally, the fact that Great Progress has been made toward a Complete and Final Agreement with Representatives of Iran, we have mutually agreed that, while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect, Project Freedom (The Movement of Ships through the Strait of Hormuz) will be paused for a short period of time to see whether or not the Agreement can be finalized and signed,” Trump wrote.

Recent reports suggested that the BSE overtook the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in the derivatives segment for the first time in April, drawing significant attention from market participants. But a closer look at the underlying data indicates that the shift appears more technical than structural.

At first glance, BSE’s notional derivatives turnover jumped to about Rs 5,377 lakh crore in April, up nearly 26% month-on-month, while NSE’s turnover dropped to around Rs 4,338 lakh crore, a 21.6% decline. This created the impression that BSE had briefly taken the lead in India’s largest trading segment.

However, analysts say this comparison is misleading. The primary issue lies in how derivative activity is measured.

Notional turnover, which multiplies contract value by underlying index levels, can exaggerate volumes when index prices are higher. Analysts point out that such calculations can distort comparisons by as much as 19 percentage points, making one exchange appear larger even if actual trading activity is not proportionally higher.

Instead, premium turnover — the actual money paid for options contracts — is considered a more reliable measure and is widely used by regulators like Sebi and institutional investors. On this basis, NSE continues to dominate.

In April, NSE retained 86.8% share in overall F&O premium turnover and 62.9% share in index options, even in what was described as a “holiday-distorted” month.
The distortion came from the structure of expiry days, which are critical drivers of derivatives volumes.NSE’s flagship Nifty contracts expire on Tuesdays. In April, two key weekly expiry sessions were lost due to holidays, directly hitting volumes on the exchange. In contrast, competing contracts with Thursday expiries for BSE were unaffected, temporarily boosting activity elsewhere.

Brokerage ICICI Securities highlighted a similar trend in its note. NSE’s options premium average daily turnover fell to Rs 64,500 crore in April, down more than 31% from March, largely due to fewer expiry days. In contrast, BSE’s premium turnover remained largely stable at Rs 33100 crore, showing only marginal growth.

The same pattern was visible in contract volumes. NSE’s average daily options contracts dropped to 142 million in April, down nearly 26% month-on-month, while BSE’s rose to 176 million, up about 20%.

Even then, combined system-wide activity actually declined. Total (NSE+BSE) options premium turnover fell to Rs 97600 crore in April, down 23% from March, suggesting the overall market cooled rather than shifted meaningfully between exchanges.

The broader takeaway is that while BSE has been steadily gaining traction — especially in options contracts — the April crossover in notional turnover does not reflect a structural change in market leadership.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

The latest Pixel 10 update introduces a major security change that prevents users from installing older Android versions. This Google Pixel 10 feature is part of a broader effort to strengthen device protection by blocking vulnerable software builds. It specifically targets rollback attempts that could expose devices to known exploits.

This Pixel 10 security update applies to multiple models, including the Pixel 10 Pro and Fold variants. By using an Android anti rollback system, Google ensures that once updated, devices cannot return to outdated firmware. While this improves Google Pixel security, it also introduces new considerations for developers and advanced users.

Pixel 10 Update Anti-Rollback Bootloader Mechanism

The Pixel 10 update works by increasing the bootloader’s anti-rollback version. Once installed, the Google Pixel 10 will reject any attempt to flash older Android builds. This ensures that devices remain protected from previously patched vulnerabilities.

This Pixel 10 security update also interacts with Android’s seamless update system, which uses two system partitions. One slot runs the current system while the other holds a backup. The Android anti rollback feature creates a mismatch if an older version is flashed, which can lead to an unbootable state.

To maintain Google Pixel security, users who manually update their device must ensure both slots are properly updated. This usually involves sideloading the full OTA image after the initial update. Without this step, fallback mechanisms could fail and result in device issues.

Google Pixel 10 Security Implications Developers Users

For most users, the Pixel 10 update will have little to no noticeable impact. Regular updates continue as usual, and the Google Pixel 10 remains stable and secure. The change mainly affects advanced workflows rather than everyday use.

However, the Pixel security update presents challenges for developers. Testing older builds or reproducing bugs becomes more difficult due to the Android anti rollback restriction. In some cases, improper flashing can even lead to device bricking.

To avoid problems, developers working with Google Pixel security features must follow updated procedures. This includes ensuring both system slots are synchronized after updates. While the new system improves safety, it reduces flexibility for testing and recovery.

Android Anti Rollback Previous Implementations Comparison

The Pixel 10 security update is not the first to include anti-rollback protection. Earlier devices like the Pixel 6 and Pixel 8 series introduced similar features. The Android anti rollback system has gradually expanded with each generation.

With the Google Pixel 10, this protection is more strictly enforced. The update integrates closely with newer hardware and system designs. This strengthens Google Pixel security but also highlights the need for better recovery tools.

As the Pixel 10 update evolves, it reflects a broader shift toward locking down system integrity. While this improves protection against threats, it also changes how users interact with their devices. The balance between security and flexibility continues to shape Android’s future.

Stronger Google Pixel Security for a Safer Android Experience

The Pixel 10 update marks a clear step toward tighter security by preventing outdated software from being installed. This approach strengthens Google Pixel security and reduces the risk of exploiting older vulnerabilities. For everyday users, it means a safer and more reliable device experience.

At the same time, the Android anti rollback system introduces new challenges for developers and advanced users. Managing updates, bootloader behavior, and recovery processes now requires more attention. As the Google Pixel 10 continues to evolve, these changes highlight the growing focus on security-first design in modern smartphones.

Originally published on Tech Times

British businesses face a summer of soaring travel costs and disrupted supply chains as the United Kingdom emerges as the European economy most vulnerable to a deepening jet fuel crisis triggered by the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, according to a stark new assessment from Goldman Sachs.

The Wall Street investment bank has warned that commercial fuel inventories in Britain could fall to “critically low levels” within weeks, raising the prospect of formal rationing measures that would squeeze airlines, freight operators and the thousands of SMEs that depend on reliable air links to trade with overseas markets.

Goldman’s analysts pulled no punches in their note to clients, identifying the UK as “most exposed” among European nations because of three compounding weaknesses: depleted stockpiles, an unusually high dependence on imported fuel, and a domestic refining base that has been hollowed out over recent years. “The UK is the largest net importer of jet fuel in Europe, and it holds no strategic reserves, leaving commercial inventories as the primary buffer,” the bank concluded.

The numbers paint a sobering picture for owner-managed firms whose order books rely on the speed and reliability of British aviation. Jet fuel prices have doubled since hostilities erupted on 28 February, while carriers worldwide have stripped some two million seats from this month’s schedules in the past fortnight alone. With fuel accounting for up to a quarter of an airline’s operating costs, those increases are now flowing directly into ticket prices and freight rates.

IAG, the FTSE 100 parent of British Airways, has confirmed it will pass higher fuel costs through to passengers, conceding that its hedging programme has left it “not immune” to the volatility. Air France is bracing for a $2.4 billion increase in its annual fuel bill; American Airlines anticipates an additional $4 billion. Both have signalled fare rises and a paring back of passenger perks.

For UK plc, the implications stretch well beyond the holiday season. Michael O’Leary, chief executive of Ryanair, told reporters on Friday that European rivals were “desperately” hunting for flights to axe and would start doing so within weeks. Fuel providers, meanwhile, have warned airlines that Britain has the “most limited visibility” in Europe on future supply, a direct consequence of its heavy reliance on Middle Eastern imports.

The Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, last week conceded that holidaymakers may need to reconsider “where they go on holiday” — an unusually candid admission that has done little to reassure the travel trade or the SME exporters who use passenger flights’ belly-hold capacity to move time-sensitive goods to Europe and beyond.

Government ministers have publicly insisted that Britain can source fuel from alternative markets, but Goldman’s analysis exposes the structural fragility behind that confidence. The closure of Grangemouth, Scotland’s only oil refinery, in April 2025 stripped meaningful domestic capacity from the system. Question marks have also hung over the Prax Lindsey refinery in North Lincolnshire, though its new owner, US energy major Phillips 66, has insisted its acquisition will bolster UK fuel security.

Adding to the structural critique, a report from the Tony Blair Institute published this week argued that Europe’s tendency to frame energy policy primarily through a climate lens has left the continent paying two to three times more for power than its global competitors, while simultaneously deepening its reliance on imports, exactly the dependency now being so painfully exposed.

Brussels is scrambling to respond. The European Commission confirmed on Monday that it will issue formal guidance on jet fuel for airlines later this week. “I don’t think anyone knows how long this situation will last,” commission spokeswoman Anna-Kaisa Itkonen told reporters, “so the best we can do and the most effective thing that we can do and that we are doing is to prepare for all eventualities.”

The Gulf region accounts for roughly one fifth of jet fuel traded on international markets, and Europe is among its biggest customers. With the Strait of Hormuz effectively shut, carriers across the continent are now bidding against one another for cargoes from Asia and the United States, and prices are climbing accordingly.

Fuel suppliers have indicated that May should remain manageable but have flagged “mid to late June as the potential start of disruptions” if the strait does not reopen, a timeline that puts the peak summer trading window for hospitality, travel and export-led SMEs squarely in the danger zone.

For the army of British small businesses whose growth plans assume cheap, plentiful air connectivity, from boutique tour operators and food exporters to professional services firms with European clients, the message from the City is uncomfortably clear: prepare for higher costs, longer delays, and the very real possibility that, for the first time in a generation, jet fuel may have to be rationed in Britain.

---

Director of CBI Wales Russell Greenslade says stable policy and targeted investment to improve the business environment are essential to keep Welsh firms competitive

The race is almost over to find out which party – or parties – will lead Wales in the years ahead. It’s a pivotal moment for our country and for the party that wins, it will mark a moment for real celebration. But victory doesn’t just bring celebration, it also comes with huge responsibility to take Wales, it’s people and economy, forward.

Key among those responsibilities is making Wales one of Europe’s top performing sustainable small economies by 2035. That’s the test set by the Welsh Government, and it’s one business stands ready to help it pass. Part of that story is harnessing Wales’ outstanding geographical advantage to drive forward investment in renewables, and other clean energy projects.

The CBI’s ‘Made in Wales’ manifesto set out a clear path to prosperity for the next Welsh Government to follow, with the goal of creating a more innovative and competitive economy. It urged political leaders to tackle the skills gap by supporting more young people into work, education or employment. Coherent collaboration between Cardiff Bay and Westminster, working in partnership with business, is also needed to drive long-term sustainable growth.

READ MORE: Wales doesn’t need grants but a new approach to IP and innovation that sustains business successREAD MORE: The frustration in Wales is not politicians disagreeing but that we face the same problems of two decades ago

In a fast-changing global economy, capital investments have a critical role to play. With budgets being squeezed in the public sector and parts of the private sector, tough decisions have to be made about where a company or organisation allocates its surplus to maximise return. Surveys have shown that often, firms reduce their spending on capital-projects during periods of low growth/rising costs, despite their role boosting productivity.

This is where the banks come in. Growth capital finance is offered to enable a firm to invest to expand, to find that new market as well as keep without sacrificing local spend.

Access to growth capital – to invest in that new AI system or that energy efficiency machine in the factory remains a barrier for many Welsh companies, especially SMEs looking to scale up. While finance initiatives exist on the high street, the Development Bank of Wales can play a major role in supporting firms with the AI challenges and opportunities in the years ahead.

Significantly increasing the amount of capital the development bank can lend to firms would support even more firms realise their scale up possibilities. For example, expanding the bank’s funds beyond their £2bn capitalisation would enable more Welsh SMEs to obtain the patient growth capital they need to create, export and expand.

The new government should look to partner with institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies to create a Wales-based investment platform that channels large-scale private investment into local projects and firms, strengthening our funding ecosystem for innovation and expansion and allowing firms to scale up at home rather than relocating.

Another concern is the lack of funding for key infrastructure projects in Wales, with £247 per person spent on infrastructure in Scotland in the past five years, compared to only £120 per person in Wales.

Government and business jointly investing in modern, reliable infrastructure will connect Welsh businesses to markets and talent, as well as significantly boosting productivity. To achieve that goal, we need to make real changes to the planning system to speed up improvements to the A55 in North Wales and deliver the M4 relief road in the south. Every £1 invested by government in building the relief road will deliver £2 (from improvements to transport economic efficiency, safety and lower carbon emissions) back that can be re-invested in the Welsh economy. We know it’s a great investment.

We must also press ahead with rail electrification in North and South Wales, and digital infrastructure so that all areas, especially rural communities, can access full-fibre broadband and 5G coverage.

In this economic climate, stable policy and targeted investment to improve the business environment are essential to keep Welsh firms competitive and deliver the devolution dividend.

We also need a Welsh industrial strategy to tie everything together and give us a roadmap for boosting Wales’s competitiveness. The strategy should offer practical solutions to expanding sources of patient capital, accelerate shovel-ready infrastructure projects, and ensure regulation and business policies incentivise productivity improvements.

Many of these steps require coordination between different agencies and government. Local authorities and the regional corporate joint committees, such as the Cardiff Capital Region, delivering on the ground and shaping strategy, the Welsh Government focusing on devolved economic levers and removing major blockers, and the UK Government providing funding options and policy support for UK-wide issues. By doing so, Wales can orchestrate an approach that will attract more investment, both domestic and foreign, and help good firms scale up here rather than elsewhere.

Whoever is elected must make collaboration with corporate joint committees and individual councils a key priority. That’s how we take a meaningful step forward with vital regional projects and ensure no corner of Wales is left behind by the AI revolution.

• Russell Greenslade is director of CBI Wales.

Britain’s small and medium-sized businesses are once again caught in the political crossfire, with long-term Government borrowing costs vaulting to their highest level in nearly three decades as the City braces for what could prove a torrid week for Sir Keir Starmer.

The yield on the 30-year gilt climbed to 5.772 per cent on Tuesday, a level not seen since 1998, while the benchmark ten-year gilt jumped 0.13 percentage points to trade above 5.1 per cent, territory last visited during the 2008 financial crisis. As bond yields and prices move in opposite directions, the sell-off lays bare the depth of unease among investors. For SME owners watching their overdrafts and refinancing windows, it is a deeply unwelcome turn.

The trigger is Thursday’s local elections, in which Labour is widely tipped to shed well over 1,000 council seats to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK and the Green Party. Should the results prove as bleak as forecast, Westminster watchers expect Sir Keir to face an internal challenge, most likely from the Labour left, with the Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and the former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner among those whose names are circulating in Whitehall and the Square Mile alike.

For investors, the calculation is brutally simple: any successor drawn from that wing of the party is likely to loosen the purse strings further, piling additional borrowing on to an already stretched balance sheet.

“The prospect of a leadership challenge is yet another source of uncertainty for businesses and households that could prompt them to put off investment and spending,” Thomas Pugh, chief economist at RSM UK, told clients in a note. “Financial markets would likely respond by pushing gilt yields higher, as any successor is likely to be more spendthrift than Starmer and [Rachel] Reeves, raising borrowing costs across the economy.”

Analysts at the Japanese investment bank Nomura warned that “low turnout … and voters more willing to register a protest at local vs national elections make this set of elections particularly risky for Labour and the PM in particular.”

The implications for the UK’s 5.5 million small and medium-sized enterprises are sobering. Britain’s borrowing costs are now the highest in the G7, and have climbed sharply since the Gulf conflict erupted just over two months ago. As a major importer of natural gas, the country is acutely exposed to the war’s inflationary aftershocks, and that pain feeds directly through to the cost base of every owner-managed firm in the land, from manufacturers wrestling with energy bills to high-street retailers facing yet another squeeze on consumer wallets.

The pound nudged higher against the dollar to $1.35 on Tuesday, but the FTSE 100 closed more than 1 per cent down as investors trimmed their exposure to UK assets across the board.

Compounding the gloom, the Bank of England is now widely expected to lift interest rates later this year rather than cut them, a sharp reversal from the consensus that prevailed before hostilities began. Last week, Threadneedle Street warned that rates could climb as high as 5.25 per cent if oil and gas prices remain elevated, with inflation potentially breaching 6 per cent in a worst-case scenario, up from 3.3 per cent today. Bank Rate was held at 3.75 per cent at the latest meeting.

Nomura, BNP Paribas and Pantheon Macroeconomics have all torn up their forecasts, now pencilling in rate rises rather than the two cuts previously expected for 2026. For SMEs servicing variable-rate loans, asset finance arrangements or commercial mortgages, that represents a meaningful step-change in the cost of doing business.

Bond markets, normally preoccupied with the minutiae of interest-rate expectations, have grown unusually fixated on Westminster. The fear is that Sir Keir will either be forced into a more expansive fiscal stance to placate his backbenchers, or replaced outright by a successor with an even bigger spending appetite. Either path leads to heavier borrowing at a moment when the public finances are already perilously thin: the debt-to-GDP ratio is hovering near 100 per cent and debt interest payments are projected to exceed £100 billion a year until at least 2031.

In a separate blow on Tuesday, the Bank of England disclosed that the cumulative loss on its quantitative easing programme had widened to £125 billion, up from £115 billion previously, a tab the taxpayer will pick up under the indemnity agreement struck with the Treasury.

For Britain’s business owners, the message from the gilt market is uncomfortable but unmistakable. Whatever Thursday delivers at the ballot box, the cost of capital is heading in one direction, and prudence, on hiring, on capex, on inventory, is once again the watchword.

---