That early work shaped how he thinks about pressure, teamwork, and staying calm when something goes wrong.

Reight studied psychology at the University of Maryland, College Park, then trained as a doctor at the Medical University of the Americas. Over the course of his career he has taken on several leadership posts alongside his surgical work: medical staff president, chief of surgery, and medical director of a breast centre and of a wound care and hyperbaric programme. He has also led as a robotic surgery surgeon, a role that sits at the newer end of general surgery.

Ian’s path has never run in a straight line from operating theatre to boardroom and back. He has treated leadership as part of the job, not separate from it, which is why he has moved between clinical roles and administrative ones without seeing much of a divide. Now based in Mount Vernon, Maine, he continues that pattern: seeing patients, running a surgical practice, and keeping an eye on how the systems around care actually work.

He writes and speaks about medicine and leadership, drawing on the same instincts he built as a first responder: assess quickly, communicate clearly, and do not let ego get in the way of the outcome. That grounding, more than any single title, is what he brings to Mount Vernon.

Interview with Ian Reight

You grew up in Maryland but you’re practising in Mount Vernon, Maine now. How did that move come about?

Maryland is where I’m from, it’s where I trained early on and where I did my firefighting and paramedic work. Maine is where I practise now. Mount Vernon is a small place, and that changes the job in ways people don’t always expect. You’re not one of a dozen general surgeons in a big system. You’re often the surgeon a patient has met, and will meet again.

What’s different about practising surgery in a small Maine town compared to a bigger market?

The distances matter more. If a patient needs a specialist referral or a longer recovery stay, that’s not always five minutes away. You plan around that. You also tend to know more about a patient’s life before they ever get to the table, because word travels and because you see the same families over years, not just once.

Does that change how you approach a first consultation?

A little. In a bigger city, a first meeting is often the only meeting where you’re building trust from zero. In Mount Vernon, there’s usually some context already there, whether from the patient themselves or from someone they know who I’ve treated before. That doesn’t mean I skip steps. I still walk through the same things every time: what the procedure involves, what recovery looks like, what could go wrong. But the conversation starts from a slightly different place.

You’ve held both clinical and administrative leadership roles. Does a smaller setting change how you think about leadership?

It sharpens it, honestly. In a large hospital, a leadership title can mean managing systems you rarely see up close. In a smaller setting, you see the direct effect of a decision almost immediately. If a follow-up process isn’t working, you hear about it from the patient the next week, not from a report months later. That immediacy keeps you honest.

What drew you to general surgery in the first place, going back to your time in Maryland?

The firefighting and paramedic work came first. That taught me to work under pressure and to trust a process even when things are moving fast. Surgery asked something similar of me, but with more time to prepare and more room to think ahead of the moment itself. Psychology, which I studied before medicine, gave me another piece: patients aren’t just a set of symptoms. How they understand what’s happening to them affects how they recover.

How has your work in wound care and breast centre leadership shaped your day-to-day surgical practice now in Maine?

Those roles taught me to look past the operation itself and think about the whole arc of care. Wound care in particular is unglamorous but it tells you a lot about whether a recovery is on track. I carry that habit into general surgery here: I don’t consider a case finished at the incision closing. I want to know how it heals, and I want the patient to know what to watch for too.

What does a typical week look like for you in Mount Vernon?

It’s a mix of clinical time and the kind of oversight work I’ve done for years, just on a smaller scale. Fewer layers between me and the decision, which I don’t mind. At home, my dogs and cooking are how I switch off. Neither has anything to do with surgery, and that’s the point.

Is there anything about practising in a small Maine town that surprised you?

How much continuity matters to patients. In a larger system, people expect to be handed between providers. Here, they expect to see the same face again, and that expectation has made me more careful about the small things: a follow-up call, a clear explanation, remembering the details of someone’s case without having to check the chart first.

President Donald Trump is planning to hold a state dinner next week to mark a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping, and several tech industry leaders are expected to attend.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Apple Executive Chairman Tim Cook are both reportedly planning to attend the state dinner.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is also expected to attend the event, a person familiar with the matter told FOX Business.

The tech leaders’ anticipated attendance at the Trump-Xi state dinner comes at a time of geopolitical tensions, including over the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and access to both models and the chips that power them.

NVIDIA CEO DRAWS LINE ON AI SAFETY AFTER ALARMING INCIDENTS: ‘IF IT’S NOT READY, JUST HOLD IT BACK’

The U.S. and China are locked in a competition in which the two world powers are racing to develop more capable AI tools, which have been a source of tension between the countries.

China’s access to specialized chips that power advanced AI models has been restricted through the U.S. government’s use of export controls on advanced semiconductors, like those made by Nvidia.

Huang has been critical of those restrictions and said in May that China has “all the chips they need” despite the U.S. restrictions.

BESSENT SAYS US NEEDS MORE OPEN-SOURCE AI MODELS TO COMPETE WITH CHINA

American companies like OpenAI and Anthropic have relied on using frontier models, which are proprietary and not available for use without purchasing a license, to gain their edge in the AI race. Chinese tech companies have used distillation as a means of using open-weight models to keep up with U.S. firms’ frontier models.

Altman and other tech leaders have recently been discussing steps to rein in AI development to ensure the safety and alignment of those models amid concerns about their potential impact on humanity.

“It is the responsibility of the AI companies ourselves to develop the technology safely and to properly test it,” Huang told reporters. “If it’s not ready, just hold it back. You should go as fast as you can, but no faster than that.”

State dinners are among the highest diplomatic honors a U.S. president can bestow on a foreign leader.

NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG WARNS CHINA HAS ‘ALL THE CHIPS THEY NEED’ DESPITE US BANS

Ticker	Security	Last	Change	Change %
AAPL	APPLE INC.	337.00	+4.59	+1.38%
NVDA	NVIDIA CORP.	219.34	+5.44	+2.54%

Next week’s state dinner comes after Xi hosted a state dinner for Trump when he visited China in May. That event was also attended by Elon Musk, Huang and Cook – who was still CEO at the time and has recently transitioned into an executive chairman role at Apple.

The Trump-Xi state dinner will be the second hosted by Trump during his second term, as the first was held during a visit by Britain’s King Charles and Queen Camilla.

During his first term, he hosted state dinners for French President Emmanuel Macron in 2018 and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison in 2019.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Reuters contributed to this report.

Sales growth at U.S. retailers rose in August, rebounding from its decrease in July, the Commerce Department said.

Retailers’ sales rose by 1.2% last month to $773.9 billion, versus the 0.5% decrease recorded in July. The August reading was higher than the 0.8% increase economists polled by The Wall Street Journal expected.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Executives from American Airlines, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines said Wednesday that higher jet fuel prices are prompting carriers to adjust capacity and closely monitor flight schedules.

The global average jet fuel price rose 6.1% week over week to $181.46 per barrel last week, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA).

Speaking at Morgan Stanley’s 14th Annual Laguna Conference, American Airlines Chief Financial Officer Devon May said fourth-quarter jet fuel prices are running about $1 per gallon above what the airline projected in July, adding roughly $1 billion to its fuel bill.

“Overall for the third quarter, we feel great,” May said. “What’s happened in the last four weeks, though is fuel’s run up probably $1 a gallon or something like that for the fourth quarter alone.”

AVELO CEO WARNS AIRFARES MAY RISE AS FUEL PRICES HIT ‘UNCOMFORTABLY HIGH’ LEVELS

May said American will continue adjusting capacity later in the fourth quarter in response to higher fuel costs.

American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said the airline still expects third-quarter revenue to rise 16% to 19% from a year earlier, citing strength across domestic and international markets as well as both premium and economy cabins, according to Reuters.

“When you take into account fuel right now, yes, we’ve absolutely done a great job of recapturing a tremendous amount of that expense,” Isom said.

United Airlines Chief Financial Officer Michael Leskinen said some flights planned for December will no longer operate because of higher fuel prices.

“As you look into the fourth quarter, there’ll be some flights in December that we won’t fly that we thought we were going to fly,” he said at the Morgan Stanley conference. “If fuel remains high, we’ll make some adjustments into the first quarter and beyond into 2027.”

AIRLINE PASSENGERS ROCKED BY TURBULENCE DURING DESCENT: ‘WE STARTED TO PLUMMET’

Leskinen also described United’s fourth-quarter bookings as “tremendously strong,” saying premium travel, corporate demand and economy bookings have all remained resilient.

“Bookings have continued as we expected, so that piece of the equation is resilient — very little evidence of demand destruction,” Leskinen said.

At the conference, Southwest Airlines Chief Financial Officer Tom Doxey said the carrier has already pared back about half of the modest year-over-year capacity growth it had planned at the start of 2026. 

“If fuel is higher for longer,” Doxey said, trimming capacity would be the “natural response.”

However, a spokesperson for the airline told FOX Business the schedule adjustments made so far have been minimal and that Doxey was making an “illustrative point” about trimming capacity and was “not alluding to an action we’ve taken.”

TSA REVIVES PRE-9/11 TRADITION WITH GATE ACCESS FOR CERTAIN TRAVELERS WITHOUT TICKETS

Doxey added that stronger-than-expected fall bookings have helped offset higher fuel costs, allowing Southwest to maintain its third-quarter earnings guidance, according to Reuters.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Spokespersons for American Airlines and United Airlines told FOX Business the carriers had nothing further to add.

Reuters contributed to this report.

The NSE IPO witnessed steady investor response, with the issue subscribed 42% at the end of bidding on Day 1. The company received bids for 3.7 crore shares on Thursday against 8.86 crore shares available for public subscription. The retail portion was subscribed 42%, against 4.41 crore shares reserved for the category.

Meanwhile, the grey market premium (GMP) for the NSE IPO was hovering around 9%, signalling expectations of a moderate listing gain.

The Rs 22,569 crore issue is entirely an offer for sale of 12.64 crore shares. NSE will not receive any proceeds from the IPO, as the funds will go to the selling shareholders. The price band has been fixed at Rs 1,700-1,785 per share, with a lot size of eight shares.

At the upper end of the price band, the minimum retail application amounts to Rs 14,280, while the post-issue market capitalisation works out to about Rs 4,41,788 crore. The issue will close on September 21, and the stock is expected to list on the BSE on September 24.

NSE IPO Subscription Status

At the end of Day 1, the NSE IPO was subscribed 42% overall, against the 8.86 crore shares on offer.

• Retail Individual Investors (RIIs): Subscribed 43% against 4.41 crore shares offered.
• Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs): Subscribed 70% against 1.89 crore shares offered.
• Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs): Subscribed 19% against 2.52 crore shares offered.

NSE IPO GMP today

The grey market premium for NSE IPO is around 9%, signalling moderate listing expectations. The GMP suggests positive sentiment, but not the kind of sharp listing pop usually seen in smaller issues. Given the large size of the offer and the already rich valuation, listing gains may be measured.

Should you subscribe to NSE IPO?

Brokerage views are mostly positive for the IPO. At the upper price band of Rs 1,785, NSE is valued at 42.9 times FY26 earnings. LKP Securities has given a “Subscribe” rating to the IPO and said NSE’s post-issue implied market cap stands between Rs 4.2 lakh crore and Rs 4.42 lakh crore.YES Securities has also recommended “Subscribe”, saying NSE is available at a 21% discount to BSE on P/E. It said BSE trades at 54.3 times FY26 diluted earnings, while NSE is priced at 42.9 times at the cap price.

For long-term investors, analysts say NSE offers a rare chance to own India’s dominant market infrastructure company. Its strong margins, debt-free balance sheet, market leadership and rising investor base support the long-term case.

But investors should not ignore valuation and regulatory risks. At 42.9 times FY26 earnings, the IPO is not cheap. The business is also closely tied to trading volumes, especially options. A 9% GMP shows demand is positive, but not euphoric.

Also read: $46 billion IPO: NSE is the world’s most expensive stock exchange. Can it also become the most valuable?

Angel One said NSE’s valuation at the upper price band of ₹1,785 translates to a post-issue P/E of 35.4x, lower than BSE’s 54.2x, making the issue attractive relative to its key peer. The brokerage highlighted NSE’s dominant market position, strong profitability, leadership in equity derivatives and long-term growth potential in India’s capital markets. Despite near-term regulatory headwinds, Angel One believes the valuation offers a favourable entry point and has recommended “Subscribe” to the IPO.

NSE IPO business model

NSE is India’s largest stock exchange and runs a vertically integrated platform across trading, clearing, listing, data services and index licensing. Its products span cash market, futures, options, mutual funds, commodity derivatives, currency derivatives, wholesale debt market and interest rate futures.

The exchange has held the top position in India by cash market turnover and equity derivatives turnover from FY01 to FY26. As of June 2026, NSE supported 132.4 million unique registered investors, 1,328 trading members and 3,005 listed entities with market capitalisation of about Rs 474.1 trillion.

NSE IPO strengths

NSE’s biggest strength is its near-dominant market position. Its market share stood at about 93% in the cash market, 99.7% in equity futures and 68.5% in equity options by premium turnover as of June 2026.

YES Securities said almost all of India’s listed equity trading risk flows through one platform. It said NSE’s advantage is not just pricing, but a liquidity cycle where orders go where spreads are tight, companies list where trading activity exists, and deeper markets attract more participants.

NSE IPO financials

NSE reported revenue from operations of Rs 16,601 crore in FY26, down 3.1% from Rs 17,141 crore in FY25. Profit after tax fell to Rs 10,302 crore from Rs 12,188 crore. In Q1, revenue stood at Rs 4,560 crore, while PAT came in at Rs 3,120 crore.

Read more:NSE IPO Tracker: Catch all the highlights here

Despite the fall in FY26 profit, margins remain strong. SBI Securities pegged NSE’s EBITDA margin at 67.6% in FY26 and 77.9% in Q1. PAT margin stood at 62.1% in FY26 and 68.4% in Q1.

NSE IPO risk factors

The main risk is dependence on transaction charges. NSE earned 78.7% of its FY26 revenue from transaction charges. Options alone contributed 60.2% of revenue from operations in FY26. This makes regulatory changes in derivatives an important watch point. YES Securities noted that NSE’s equity options market share by premium turnover has fallen from 96.86% in FY24 to 74.71% in FY26 and 68.48% in the June 2026 quarter.

Disclaimer: The views/recommendations mentioned in this article, wherever applicable, are those of the respective SEBI-registered Research Analyst/brokerage and have been reproduced/reported with due attribution. They should not be construed as the views or recommendations of The Economic Times Digital or the journalist. Readers are advised to consider the original research report and make their investment decisions based on their own assessment. Brokerage disclaimers here

The US Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to 3.75–4% on September 16. Crypto investors now have to assess how much of the tightening is already reflected in prices and how much more could follow. The cost of getting that distinction wrong is buying into a recovery that depends on rate cuts the Fed has little reason to deliver.

Bitcoin had weakened well before the announcement. It touched $82,163 on 4 September. By the afternoon of 16 September in India, ahead of the Fed decision, it was near $75,743. That was a fall of roughly 8%. Any account that attributes the entire decline to the hike gets the sequence wrong.

Bitcoin was trading around $75,000–$76,000 after the decision. Holding near those levels suggests that some of the expected tightening was already reflected in the price. It does not establish how Bitcoin will respond to a longer period of higher rates.Investors were also pulling money out of US spot Bitcoin ETFs. Withdrawals totalled $450.4 million on 15 September and $295.9 million the following day, according to Farside Investors. That is $746.3 million across two sessions. Two days do not establish a trend, and the first session preceded the announcement. They do make it premature to say the market has taken the decision in its stride.

Higher rates make the choice facing investors more demanding. Short-term government debt offers income with far less price uncertainty than Bitcoin. Bitcoin pays no interest of its own. Investors buying it must be willing to accept volatility for what they believe it can deliver over time.

Institutional investors make that calculation too. A fund manager can believe in Bitcoin and still reduce an allocation because borrowing has become more expensive or clients want less risk. Institutional participation cannot be treated as a permanent commitment to buy. The same investment committees that approve an allocation can cut it.
The source of inflation deserves closer attention. The conflict involving the US, Israel and Iran has added energy costs to an economy already struggling with persistent inflation. Higher rates cannot restore disrupted oil supplies. They can restrain spending and reduce the chance that an initial jump in fuel prices spreads into more lasting price increases.It would still be too convenient to describe this as an oil problem alone. The Fed reports resilient domestic spending and robust investment. Its median forecast puts core inflation, which excludes food and energy, at 3.4% this year. There is enough underlying inflation to make an early reversal of policy difficult to assume.

An energy shock does not, by itself, weaken the case for using blockchain to settle transactions more efficiently. Nor does it change Bitcoin’s supply rules. But preserving an investment argument is different from preserving demand. A household paying more for fuel has less money available to invest. A fund facing redemptions may sell an asset it still believes in. Bitcoin’s scarcity cannot prevent either decision.

The pressure also extends beyond the US. The European Central Bank raised rates by 25 basis points on 10 September, citing inflation pressures from the Middle East conflict. The Bank of England’s next decision was scheduled for 17 September. That warrants attention to policy across major economies, without assuming that their decisions are coordinated or that all will take the same course.

If more central banks tighten, crypto faces a broader constraint on funding and investor appetite. Capital can still move between countries, but fewer markets will offer cheap borrowing. For an asset class traded globally, looking only at the Fed leaves part of the picture out.

Even here, it is important to be precise about liquidity. The Fed says it will maintain ample reserves in the banking system. A rate increase does not automatically mean those reserves are being withdrawn. Crypto trading can nevertheless become thinner if buyers commit less money or market makers reduce the size of their orders. Forced selling from leveraged positions can then push prices down faster, particularly in smaller tokens.

The Fed’s projections suggest this adjustment may take time. Sixteen of 18 Fed officials envisage at least one further hike this year. The median implies a year-end range of 4–4.25%, unchanged at the end of 2027. Eight Fed officials see 4.25–4.5% for 2027. These are individual assessments, not a promised timetable, but they give investors little basis for assuming that cheaper money is imminent – liquidity may not ease as quickly as markets had hoped.

For Indian investors, the rupee adds another calculation. If the dollar strengthens against it, a fall in Bitcoin’s dollar price can translate into a smaller decline in rupee terms. That currency effect should not be mistaken for stronger demand for Bitcoin. It can reverse too.

Over the coming weeks, buying behaviour, and ETF inflow pattern and volume will tell us more than the first reaction to the announcement. A recovery financed largely by borrowing would leave the market exposed to another round of forced selling. For now, the industry needs to observe whether users continue being interested in crypto investment if the next rate cut takes much longer than expected.

(The author is Vice President, WazirX)

This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.