Business
The Evolving Role of Private Equity and Supply Chains
Private equity activity in Asia reflects the broader market’s K-shaped dynamics. Larger, well-capitalized global and regional funds continue deploying capital into quality assets, while mid-market funds face more challenging conditions.
The expansion of private credit in the region is providing flexible financing solutions, but access remains concentrated among the most established sponsors and highest-quality deals.
Key Dynamics and Trends in Asia’s M&A Market:
- Private Equity Landscape:
- The market exhibits K-shaped dynamics, with well-capitalized global and regional funds actively deploying capital into quality assets, while mid-market funds face greater challenges.
- Private credit is expanding, offering flexible financing, though access is concentrated among established sponsors and top-tier deals.
- AI readiness has become a crucial due diligence factor, with investors dedicating 30-40% of investment committee time to evaluating portfolio companies’ AI strategies; those lacking clear AI pathways face valuation discounts.
- A growing backlog of aging portfolio companies beyond their original investment horizons is creating mounting exit pressure, with trade sales and secondary buyouts being the primary routes amidst a tentative IPO recovery.
- Supply Chain Reconfiguration:
- Geopolitical tensions and trade policy uncertainty are prompting companies to use M&A to build supply chain resilience, reduce dependency risks, and support localization or nearshoring.
- This drives transactions focused on acquiring manufacturing capacity (e.g., in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, India), logistics infrastructure, and critical inputs.
- Rising defense and security budgets across Asia are also reshaping capital allocation and M&A in defense-adjacent sectors.
Asian private equity investors report spending 30-40% of investment committee time evaluating portfolio companies’ AI readiness, mirroring patterns observed in Western markets. This focus on AI due diligence represents a fundamental shift in how deals are underwritten. Companies unable to articulate credible AI strategies face valuation discounts, while those demonstrating clear AI-enabled growth pathways command premium multiples.
The region’s private equity firms also confront a growing backlog of aging portfolio companies awaiting exit. With approximately 32,500 companies globally held by private equity beyond their original investment horizons, and Asia representing a meaningful portion of that total, exit pressure is mounting. However, IPO markets in the region show only tentative signs of recovery, leaving trade sales to strategic acquirers or secondary buyouts as the primary exit routes.
Supply Chain Reconfiguration Drives Strategic Deals
Geopolitical tensions and trade policy uncertainty are reshaping Asian M&A in ways distinct from other regions. Companies are using acquisitions to build supply chain resilience, reduce dependency risks, and support localization or nearshoring strategies. This is driving transactions focused on regional manufacturing capacity, logistics infrastructure, and critical inputs.
- Geopolitical tensions and trade policy uncertainty are prompting companies to use M&A to build supply chain resilience, reduce dependency risks, and support localization or nearshoring.
- This drives transactions focused on acquiring manufacturing capacity (e.g., in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, India), logistics infrastructure, and critical inputs.
- Rising defense and security budgets across Asia are also reshaping capital allocation and M&A in defense-adjacent sectors.
According to PwC’s Global CEO Survey, 20% of global CEOs expect their company to be highly or extremely exposed to tariffs over the next 12 months, with exposure highest in economies closely linked to US trade flows, including China, Taiwan, and potentially Southeast Asian nations integrated into Chinese supply chains.
This tariff exposure is accelerating strategic repositioning. Companies are acquiring manufacturing assets in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and India to diversify production away from single-country concentration. Others are pursuing vertical integration deals to secure access to critical components and reduce exposure to supply disruptions.
Rising defense and security budgets across Asia, particularly in response to regional tensions, are also reshaping capital allocation priorities. This has implications for industrial supply chains, technology investment, and M&A activity in defense-adjacent sectors, including aerospace, advanced materials, and cybersecurity.
The Domestic Tilt in Asian Dealmaking
One of the most notable shifts in Asian M&A is the increasing preference for domestic over cross-border transactions. While cross-border deal activity picked up selectively in 2025, it grew more slowly than overall market value, highlighting a continued preference for transactions where acquirers have greater familiarity, lower execution risk, and fewer regulatory hurdles.
This domestic tilt reflects multiple factors. Regulatory approval processes for cross-border deals have become more complex and unpredictable. Geopolitical tensions make certain types of transactions politically sensitive. Currency volatility adds additional risk to international deals. And perhaps most importantly, companies find abundant opportunities for consolidation and capability building within their home markets.
The trend varies by country. Japanese companies, facing demographic constraints and limited domestic growth, continue pursuing international acquisitions despite the challenges. Indian companies show growing outbound ambition, particularly in technology and pharmaceutical sectors. Chinese outbound M&A remains constrained by capital controls and regulatory scrutiny, though strategic transactions in critical sectors still receive approval.
Technology Sector Concentration
Technology remains the dominant driver of Asian M&A activity, but the definition of “technology” continues expanding. Traditional software and internet companies are joined by semiconductor manufacturers, electronics producers, industrial automation firms, and healthcare technology businesses, all positioning themselves as technology-enabled enterprises.
This sector convergence mirrors global patterns but carries particular significance for Asia given the region’s concentration of manufacturing and electronics capabilities. Companies that successfully integrate AI into hardware manufacturing, supply chain management, and product development stand to capture disproportionate value in the next phase of technological evolution.
The semiconductor sector deserves special attention. As AI workloads drive explosive demand for advanced chips, Asian semiconductor companies and their suppliers are experiencing unprecedented strategic importance. This is driving both organic investment and M&A activity as companies race to capture value in AI-enabling infrastructure.
Macroeconomic Headwinds and Tailwinds
Asia’s macroeconomic backdrop presents a mixed picture for dealmakers. Growth in major emerging markets, including India and China, is expected to remain relatively strong by global standards, albeit below 2025 levels. However, the OECD projects global GDP growth will slow from 3.2% in 2025 to 2.9% in 2026, creating headwinds for export-oriented Asian economies.
- Asia presents a mixed macroeconomic picture, with major emerging markets like India and China expecting relatively strong growth, but a projected global GDP slowdown in 2026.
- Interest rate dynamics vary, with easing in some developed markets but complex inflation and currency pressures in emerging Asia.
- Private credit is increasingly providing alternative financing, especially for mid-market deals.
- While public debt has risen, most Asian countries maintain stronger fiscal positions than their Western counterparts, though long-term policy uncertainties remain.
Interest rate dynamics vary across the region. While rates have eased in developed markets like Japan and Australia, emerging Asian markets face more complex inflation and currency pressures. For dealmakers, this creates challenges in financing cross-border transactions and managing currency risk in multi-jurisdictional deals.
Private credit’s expansion into Asia is providing alternative financing sources, particularly for mid-market transactions where traditional bank lending has become more conservative. This development is helping bridge valuation gaps and enabling transactions that might otherwise struggle to secure financing.
Public debt levels across many Asian economies have risen since the pandemic, though most countries maintain stronger fiscal positions than Western counterparts. Still, elevated debt burdens and evolving policy priorities add longer-term uncertainty around taxation, regulation, and government spending that dealmakers must consider in their underwriting.
The Path Forward for Asian Dealmakers
Asian companies and investors face a critical juncture. The forces reshaping global M&A, particularly AI investment and the premium placed on scale, are not temporary dislocations but structural shifts likely to define dealmaking for years to come.
For Asian corporations, several imperatives emerge. First, capital allocation discipline becomes mission-critical as companies balance AI investment requirements against traditional growth strategies. Second, developing clear AI strategies and road maps is no longer optional but essential for maintaining competitiveness and valuation. Third, companies must honestly assess whether they’re better positioned as acquirers or targets in their industries’ consolidation waves.
For private equity investors in the region, the message is equally clear. Winning deals will increasingly depend on articulating how acquisitions accelerate AI capabilities and digital transformation. Portfolio value creation will require active support for companies’ AI journeys, not just operational improvements. And exit planning must account for the reality that buyers will heavily scrutinize targets’ technological readiness.
Regional financial advisors and investment banks must evolve their capabilities to support clients navigating this transformation. Traditional M&A advisory focused on valuation, structuring, and deal execution now requires deep technical expertise in AI due diligence, scenario modeling for AI-disrupted business models, and strategic positioning for technology-driven consolidation.
A Region at the Crossroads
Asia’s M&A market stands at a crossroads. The region possesses tremendous strengths: high growth rates, large domestic markets, world-class manufacturing capabilities, and increasing technological sophistication. These advantages position Asian companies well for the AI era, provided they can mobilize capital, talent, and strategic vision effectively.
Yet challenges are equally significant. Geopolitical tensions constrain cross-border dealmaking. Regulatory uncertainty complicates execution. Confidence remains uneven across markets. And the sheer scale of AI investment required risks overwhelming companies lacking access to deep capital pools.
The 10% increase in Asian deal values during 2025 represents progress, but it also highlights the region’s underperformance relative to the Americas’ 55% surge. As AI-driven dealmaking accelerates globally, Asia risks falling behind if companies and investors don’t move more aggressively to acquire capabilities, consolidate fragmented markets, and position for the innovation supercycle likely to emerge as AI productivity gains materialize.
The K-shaped market dynamic offers no middle ground. Asian companies and markets will either accelerate their participation in transformative dealmaking or watch competitive advantages flow to better-capitalized, more technologically advanced rivals. In a world where AI readiness increasingly determines valuation and where megadeals concentrate value creation, scale and speed matter more than ever.
For Asia’s dealmakers, the message is unambiguous: the window for strategic repositioning is narrowing. The companies and markets that move decisively to acquire AI capabilities, pursue transformative consolidation, and invest in technological infrastructure will emerge as leaders. Those that wait for perfect conditions or clearer signals risk finding themselves on the wrong side of the K-curve, watching the future unfold from an increasingly disadvantaged position.