Business
Thomson Reuters Reports Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Results
- Solid revenue momentum continued in the fourth quarter and full year 2025
- Full-year total company revenues up 3% / organic revenues up 7%
- Fourth-quarter total company revenues up 5% / organic revenues up 7%
- Organic revenues up 9% for the “Big 3” segments (Legal Professionals, Corporates and Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals) in the fourth quarter and full year
- Met full-year 2025 outlook for organic revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA margin for total company and “Big 3”; Met free cash flow outlook
- Full-year 2026 outlook anticipates organic revenue growth of approximately 7.5% – 8.0% and adjusted EBITDA margin expansion of approximately 100 basis points from 39.2% in 2025
- Increased annualized dividend by 10% to
$2.62 per common share (33rd consecutive annual increase)
“Our fourth‑quarter results capped a year of important progress for
Hasker added, “We remain focused on allocating capital to drive long-term shareholder value creation. Last year we executed several strategic acquisitions and continued to return capital to shareholders, enabling us to enter this year with a stronger and more strategically aligned portfolio with improved growth prospects.”
Consolidated Financial Highlights – Three Months Ended
|
Three months ended |
||||||||||
|
(Millions of |
||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||
|
IFRS Financial Measures(1) |
2025 |
2024 |
Change |
|||||||
|
Revenues |
|
|
5 % |
|||||||
|
Operating profit |
|
|
-25 % |
|||||||
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) |
|
|
-43 % |
|||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
35 % |
|||||||
|
Non-IFRS Financial Measures(1) |
2025 |
2024 |
Change |
Change at |
||||||
|
Revenue growth in constant currency |
5 % |
|||||||||
|
Organic revenue growth |
7 % |
|||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
8 % |
8 % |
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
38.7 % |
37.6 % |
110bp |
140bp |
||||||
|
Adjusted EPS |
|
|
6 % |
7 % |
||||||
|
Free cash flow |
|
|
38 % |
|||||||
|
(1) In addition to results reported in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the company uses certain non- |
||||||||||
Revenues increased 5% due to 6% growth in recurring revenues (84% of total revenues) and 11% growth in transactions revenues, partly offset by a 6% decline in Global Print. Total company revenue growth was negatively impacted by net acquisitions and disposals of 3%. Foreign currency had a slightly positive impact on revenue growth.
- Organic revenues increased 7% reflecting 9% growth in recurring revenues, 8% growth in transactions revenues and a 6% decline in Global Print.
- The company’s “Big 3” segments reported organic revenue growth of 9% and collectively comprised 82% of total revenues.
Operating profit decreased 25% primarily due to other operating gains in the prior-year period substantially related to the sale of
- Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes other operating gains, amortization of software, as well as other adjustments, increased 8% and the related margin increased to 38.7% from 37.6% in the prior-year period, primarily due to higher operating leverage. Foreign currency negatively impacted the year-over-year change in adjusted EBITDA margin by 30 basis points.
Diluted EPS decreased to
- Adjusted EPS, which excludes net other operating gains, other finance costs or income, as well as other adjustments, increased to
$1.07 per share compared to$1.01 per share in the prior-year period, primarily due to higher adjusted EBITDA, partly offset by higher amortization of internally developed software and interest expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
- Free cash flow increased by
$156 million as higher net cash provided by operating activities was partly offset by lower cash flows from other investing activities, which included a cash flow benefit in the prior-year period.
Highlights by Customer Segment – Three Months Ended
|
(Millions of |
||||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||||
|
Three months ended |
Change |
|||||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Constant |
Organic(1)(2) |
||||||||
|
Revenues |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
1 % |
1 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
496 |
458 |
8 % |
7 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
414 |
366 |
13 % |
13 % |
11 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
1,648 |
1,553 |
6 % |
5 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
232 |
218 |
7 % |
6 % |
5 % |
|||||||
|
Global Print |
136 |
144 |
-6 % |
-6 % |
-6 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(7) |
(6) |
||||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
5 % |
5 % |
7 % |
|||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
9 % |
9 % |
||||||||
|
Corporates |
160 |
153 |
4 % |
4 % |
||||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
222 |
196 |
14 % |
13 % |
||||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
709 |
648 |
9 % |
9 % |
||||||||
|
|
48 |
45 |
7 % |
12 % |
||||||||
|
Global Print |
54 |
55 |
-2 % |
-2 % |
||||||||
|
Corporate costs |
(34) |
(30) |
n/a |
n/a |
||||||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
8 % |
8 % |
||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
44.3 % |
41.0 % |
330bp |
350bp |
||||||||
|
Corporates |
32.2 % |
33.5 % |
-130bp |
-70bp |
||||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
53.6 % |
53.4 % |
20bp |
0bp |
||||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
43.0 % |
41.7 % |
130bp |
150bp |
||||||||
|
|
21.0 % |
20.8 % |
20bp |
140bp |
||||||||
|
Global Print |
39.6 % |
38.2 % |
140bp |
160bp |
||||||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
38.7 % |
37.6 % |
110bp |
140bp |
||||||||
|
(1) See the “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” section and the tables appended to this news release for additional information on these and |
||||||||||||
|
(2) Computed for revenue growth only. |
||||||||||||
|
n/a: not applicable |
||||||||||||
Unless otherwise noted, all revenue growth comparisons by customer segment in this news release are at constant currency (which excludes the impact of foreign currency) as the company believes this provides the best basis to measure performance.
Legal Professionals
Revenues increased 1% despite the disposal of
- Recurring revenues increased 1% (97% of total, increased 8% organic). Organic revenue growth was primarily driven by Westlaw, CoCounsel and
Practical Law . - Transactions revenues were essentially unchanged (3% of total, increased 28% organic).
Adjusted EBITDA increased 9% to
- The margin increased to 44.3% from 41.0% primarily reflecting higher operating leverage as well as the disposal of the lower margin FindLaw business in the prior-year period.
Corporates
Revenues increased 7% despite a negative impact from the sale of certain non-core businesses. Organic revenues increased 9%.
- Recurring revenues increased 7% (88% of total, increased 9% organic). Organic revenue growth was primarily driven by Indirect Tax, Direct Tax, Westlaw,
Practical Law ,Pagero and the segment’s international businesses. - Transactions revenues increased 7% (12% of total, all organic). Organic revenue growth was primarily driven by increases in Indirect Tax, Global Trade and the segment’s international businesses.
Adjusted EBITDA increased 4% to
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals
Revenues increased 13%, including the acquisition impact of SafeSend which was reflected in transactions revenues. Organic revenue growth was 11%.
- Recurring revenues increased 12% (86% of total, all organic). Organic revenue growth was primarily driven by UltraTax, CoCounsel and the segment’s
Latin America business. - Transactions revenues increased 19% (14% of total, increased 3% organic). Organic revenue growth was primarily driven by SafeSend and the segment’s international businesses.
Adjusted EBITDA increased 14% to
The Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals segment is the company’s most seasonal business with approximately 60% of full-year revenues typically generated in the first and fourth quarters. As a result, the margin performance of this segment has been generally higher in the first and fourth quarters as costs are typically incurred in a more linear fashion throughout the year.
Revenues increased 6% (5% organic), primarily due to higher generative AI related transactional content licensing revenue in the Agency business, as well as a contractual price increase from the company’s news agreement with the Data & Analytics business of London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG).
Adjusted EBITDA increased 7% to
Global Print
Revenues decreased 6%, all organic, driven by lower shipment volumes.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased 2% to
Corporate Costs
Corporate costs were
Consolidated Financial Highlights – Year Ended
|
Year ended |
||||||||||
|
(Millions of |
||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||
|
IFRS Financial Measures(1) |
2025 |
2024 |
Change |
|||||||
|
Revenues |
|
|
3 % |
|||||||
|
Operating profit |
|
|
1 % |
|||||||
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
-32 % |
|||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8 % |
|||||||
|
Non-IFRS Financial Measures(1) |
2025 |
2024 |
Change |
Change at |
||||||
|
Revenue growth in constant currency |
3 % |
|||||||||
|
Organic revenue growth |
7 % |
|||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
6 % |
5 % |
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
39.2 % |
38.2 % |
100bp |
80bp |
||||||
|
Adjusted EPS |
|
|
4 % |
4 % |
||||||
|
Free cash flow |
|
|
7 % |
|||||||
|
(1) In addition to results reported in accordance with IFRS, the company uses certain non-IFRS financial measures as supplemental |
||||||||||
Revenues increased 3% due to 3% growth in recurring revenues (81% of total revenues) and 5% growth in transactions revenues, partly offset by a 6% decline in Global Print. Total company revenue growth was negatively impacted by net acquisitions and disposals of 4%. Foreign currency had no impact on revenue growth.
- Organic revenues increased 7% reflecting 9% growth in recurring revenues, 4% growth in transactions revenues and a 5% decline in Global Print.
- The company’s “Big 3” segments reported organic revenue growth of 9% and collectively comprised 82% of total revenues.
Operating profit increased 1% primarily driven by the net impact of higher revenues and operating expenses, partially offset by higher amortization of software.
- Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes amortization of software, as well as other adjustments, increased 6% and the related margin increased to 39.2% from 38.2%, primarily due to higher operating leverage. Foreign currency contributed 20 basis points to the year-over-year change in adjusted EBITDA margin.
Diluted EPS decreased to
- Adjusted EPS, which excludes the non-cash tax benefit, as well as other adjustments, increased to
$3.92 per share compared to$3.77 per share in the prior year, primarily due to higher adjusted EBITDA, partly offset by higher amortization of internally developed software, income tax expense and interest expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
- Free cash flow increased by
$122 million as higher net cash provided by operating activities was partly offset by higher capital expenditures and lower cash flows from other investing activities.
Highlights by Customer Segment – Year Ended
|
(Millions of |
||||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||||
|
Year ended |
Change |
|||||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Constant |
Organic(1)(2) |
||||||||
|
Revenues |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
-2 % |
-2 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
1,987 |
1,844 |
8 % |
7 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
1,302 |
1,165 |
12 % |
13 % |
11 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
6,157 |
5,931 |
4 % |
4 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
853 |
832 |
3 % |
2 % |
1 % |
|||||||
|
Global Print |
490 |
519 |
-6 % |
-5 % |
-5 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(24) |
(24) |
||||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
3 % |
3 % |
7 % |
|||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
4 % |
3 % |
||||||||
|
Corporates |
716 |
671 |
7 % |
6 % |
||||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
623 |
527 |
18 % |
19 % |
||||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
2,695 |
2,500 |
8 % |
7 % |
||||||||
|
|
174 |
196 |
-11 % |
-11 % |
||||||||
|
Global Print |
185 |
188 |
-2 % |
-2 % |
||||||||
|
Corporate costs |
(118) |
(105) |
n/a |
n/a |
||||||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
6 % |
5 % |
||||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
47.3 % |
44.6 % |
270bp |
250bp |
||||||||
|
Corporates |
36.0 % |
36.3 % |
-30bp |
-30bp |
||||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
47.1 % |
45.2 % |
190bp |
150bp |
||||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
43.6 % |
42.1 % |
150bp |
130bp |
||||||||
|
|
20.4 % |
23.6 % |
-320bp |
-290bp |
||||||||
|
Global Print |
37.7 % |
36.2 % |
150bp |
120bp |
||||||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
39.2 % |
38.2 % |
100bp |
80bp |
||||||||
|
(1) See the “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” section and the tables appended to this news release for additional information on these and |
||||||||||||
|
(2) Computed for revenue growth only. |
||||||||||||
|
n/a: not applicable |
||||||||||||
2026 Outlook
The company’s outlook for 2026 in the table below assumes constant currency rates and does not factor in the impact of any future acquisitions or dispositions that may occur during the year.
The company expects its first-quarter 2026 organic revenue growth to be approximately 7% and its adjusted EBITDA margin to be approximately 42%.
The company’s 2026 outlook is forward-looking information that is subject to risks and uncertainties (see “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, Material Risks and Material Assumptions”). In particular, the company continues to operate in an uncertain macroeconomic environment, reflecting ongoing geopolitical risk, uneven economic growth and an evolving interest rate and inflationary backdrop. Any worsening of the global economic or business environment, among other factors, could impact the company’s ability to achieve its outlook.
Reported Full-Year 2025 Results and Full-Year 2026 Outlook
|
Total |
FY 2025 Reported |
FY 2026 Outlook |
|
Total Revenue Growth |
3%(2) |
7.5% – 8.0% |
|
Organic Revenue Growth(1) |
7 % |
7.5% – 8.0% |
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) |
39.2 % |
+100bps vs 2025 |
|
Corporate Costs |
|
|
|
Free Cash Flow(1) |
|
~ |
|
Accrued Capex as % of Revenues(1) |
8.2 % |
~ 8.0% |
|
Depreciation & Amortization of Software Depreciation & Amortization of Amortization of |
|
|
|
Net Interest Expense |
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate on Adjusted Earnings(1) |
18.5 % |
~ 19% |
|
“Big 3” Segments(1) |
FY 2025 Reported |
FY 2026 Outlook |
|
Total Revenue Growth |
4%(2) |
~ 9.5% |
|
Organic Revenue Growth |
9 % |
~ 9.5% |
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
43.6 % |
+100bps vs 2025 |
|
(1) |
Non-IFRS financial measures. See the “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” section below as well as the tables appended to this news release for more information. |
|
(2) |
Total revenue growth reflects the impact of the disposals of |
The information in this section is forward-looking. Actual results, which will include the impact of currency, future acquisitions and dispositions completed during 2026, and macroeconomic events outside of the company’s control may differ materially from the company’s 2026 outlook. The information in this section should also be read in conjunction with the section below entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, Material Risks and Material Assumptions.” The company’s 2026 outlook is also based on certain assumptions described in the cross-referenced section, which the company believes are reasonable in the circumstances, and is subject to a number of risks, including those specifically identified in the cross-referenced section and those facing the company generally.
Segment Name Changes
As reflected in this earnings release, the company changed the names of its Tax & Accounting Professionals segment to Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals and its
Dividends and Common Shares Outstanding
The company announced today that its Board of Directors approved a 10% or
In
NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES
This news release includes certain non-IFRS financial measures, which include ratios that incorporate one or more non-IFRS financial measures, such as adjusted EBITDA (other than at the customer segment level) and the related margin, free cash flow, adjusted earnings and the effective tax rate on adjusted earnings, adjusted EPS, accrued capital expenditures expressed as a percentage of revenues, net debt and leverage ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA, selected measures excluding the impact of foreign currency, changes in revenues computed on an organic basis as well as all financial measures for the “Big 3” segments. The company modified its definition of net debt to account for interest rate swap arrangements entered into during the third quarter of 2025. The change did not have a material impact on its calculation of net debt.
The company’s outlook contains various non-IFRS financial measures. The company believes that providing reconciliations of forward-looking non-IFRS financial measures in its outlook would be potentially misleading and not practical due to the difficulty of projecting items that are not reflective of ongoing operations in any future period. The magnitude of these items may be significant. Consequently, for purposes of its outlook only, the company is unable to reconcile these non-IFRS measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures because it cannot predict, with reasonable certainty, the impacts of changes in foreign exchange rates which impact (i) the translation of its results reported at average foreign currency rates for the year, and (ii) other finance income or expense related to intercompany financing arrangements. Additionally, the company cannot reasonably predict the occurrence or amount of other operating gains and losses that generally arise from business transactions that the company does not currently anticipate.
ROUNDING
Other than EPS, the company reports its results in millions of
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, MATERIAL RISKS AND MATERIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Certain statements in this news release, including, but not limited to, statements in
Some of the material risk factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, those discussed on pages 16-27 in the “Risk Factors” section of the company’s 2024 annual report. These and other risk factors are discussed in materials that
The company’s business 2026 outlook is based on information currently available to the company and is based on various external and internal assumptions made by the company in light of its experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that the company believes are appropriate under the circumstances. Material assumptions and material risks may cause actual performance to differ from the company’s expectations underlying its business outlook. In particular, the global economy has experienced substantial disruption due to concerns regarding economic effects associated with the macroeconomic backdrop and ongoing geopolitical risks. The company’s business outlook assumes that uncertain macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions will continue to disrupt the economy and cause periods of volatility, however, these conditions may last substantially longer than expected and any worsening of the global economic or business environment could impact the company’s ability to achieve its outlook and affect its results and other expectations. Material assumptions related to the company’s revenue outlook are that uncertain macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions will continue to disrupt the economy and cause periods of volatility; there will be a continued need for trusted products and services that help customers navigate evolving and complex legal, tax, audit, accounting, regulatory, geopolitical and commercial changes, developments and environments, and for cloud-based digital tools that drive productivity;
Material risks related to the company’s revenue outlook are that ongoing geopolitical instability and uncertainty regarding interest rates and inflation, continue to impact the global economy. The severity and duration of any one, or a combination, of these conditions could impact the global economy and lead to lower demand for our products and services (beyond our assumption that these disruptions will cause periods of volatility); uncertainty in the legal regulatory regime relating to artificial intelligence (AI) has made it difficult for the company to predict the risks associated with the use of AI in its businesses and products. Future legislation may make it harder for the company to conduct its business using AI, lead to regulatory fines or penalties, require it to change its product offerings or business practices or prevent or limit its use of AI; demand for the company’s products and services could be reduced by changes in customer buying patterns or in its inability to execute on key product design or customer support initiatives; competitive pricing actions and product innovation could impact the company’s revenues; and the company’s sales, commercial simplification and product initiatives may be insufficient to retain customers or generate new sales. Material risks related to the company’s adjusted EBITDA margin outlook are the same as the risks above related to the revenue outlook; higher than expected inflation may lead to greater than anticipated increase in labor costs, third-party supplier costs and costs of print materials; and acquisition and disposal activity may dilute the company’s adjusted EBITDA margin. Material risks related to the company’s free cash flow outlook are the same as the risks above related to the revenue and adjusted EBITDA margin targets; a weaker macroeconomic environment could negatively impact working capital performance, including the ability of the company’s customers to pay; capital expenditures may be higher than currently expected; and the timing and amount of tax payments to governments may differ from the company’s expectations. Material risks related to the company’s effective tax rate on adjusted earnings outlook are the same as the risks above related to adjusted EBITDA; a material change in the geographical mix of the company’s pre-tax profits and losses; a material change in current tax laws or treaties to which the company is subject, and did not expect; resolution of tax audits may cause material changes to assessments of uncertain tax positions as compared to current estimates; and depreciation and amortization of internally developed software as well as net interest expense may be significantly higher or lower than expected.
The company has provided an outlook for the purpose of presenting information about current expectations for the period presented. This information may not be appropriate for other purposes. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which reflect expectations only as of the date of this news release.
Except as may be required by applicable law,
CONTACTS
|
|
|||||||
|
Consolidated Income Statement |
|||||||
|
(millions of |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
Year Ended |
||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
||||
|
CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|||||||
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Operating expenses |
(1,231) |
(1,183) |
(4,578) |
(4,471) |
|||
|
Depreciation |
(28) |
(26) |
(111) |
(113) |
|||
|
Amortization of software |
(187) |
(160) |
(721) |
(618) |
|||
|
Amortization of other identifiable intangible assets |
(25) |
(22) |
(98) |
(91) |
|||
|
Other operating gains, net |
2 |
204 |
164 |
144 |
|||
|
Operating profit |
540 |
722 |
2,132 |
2,109 |
|||
|
Finance costs, net: |
|||||||
|
Net interest expense |
(40) |
(28) |
(143) |
(125) |
|||
|
Other finance (costs) income |
(4) |
53 |
(55) |
45 |
|||
|
Income before tax and equity method investments |
496 |
747 |
1,934 |
2,029 |
|||
|
Share of post-tax (losses) earnings in equity method investments |
(5) |
(5) |
(28) |
40 |
|||
|
Tax (expense) benefit |
(158) |
(135) |
(423) |
123 |
|||
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
333 |
607 |
1,483 |
2,192 |
|||
|
(Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(1) |
(20) |
19 |
15 |
|||
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Earnings (loss) attributable to: |
|||||||
|
Common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Non-controlling interests |
– |
– |
– |
(3) |
|||
|
Earnings per share: |
|||||||
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|||||||
|
From continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
From discontinued operations |
(0.01) |
(0.05) |
0.05 |
0.03 |
|||
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|||||||
|
From continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
From discontinued operations |
(0.01) |
(0.04) |
0.04 |
0.04 |
|||
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Basic weighted-average common shares |
445,215,119 |
450,077,127 |
448,971,715 |
450,609,712 |
|||
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares |
445,597,771 |
450,600,114 |
449,532,466 |
451,239,490 |
|||
|
|
|||||||
|
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position |
|||||||
|
(millions of |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
||||||
|
Assets |
|||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|||||
|
Trade and other receivables |
1,143 |
1,087 |
|||||
|
Other financial assets |
94 |
35 |
|||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
480 |
400 |
|||||
|
Current assets |
2,228 |
3,490 |
|||||
|
Property and equipment, net |
361 |
386 |
|||||
|
Software, net |
1,645 |
1,453 |
|||||
|
Other identifiable intangible assets, net |
3,102 |
3,134 |
|||||
|
|
7,913 |
7,262 |
|||||
|
Equity method investments |
202 |
269 |
|||||
|
Other financial assets |
466 |
442 |
|||||
|
Other non-current assets |
680 |
625 |
|||||
|
Deferred tax |
1,343 |
1,376 |
|||||
|
Total assets |
|
|
|||||
|
Liabilities and equity |
|||||||
|
Liabilities |
|||||||
|
Current indebtedness |
|
|
|||||
|
Payables, accruals and provisions |
1,090 |
1,091 |
|||||
|
Current tax liabilities |
224 |
197 |
|||||
|
Deferred revenue |
1,251 |
1,062 |
|||||
|
Other financial liabilities |
108 |
113 |
|||||
|
Current liabilities |
3,468 |
3,436 |
|||||
|
Long-term indebtedness |
1,328 |
1,847 |
|||||
|
Provisions and other non-current liabilities |
656 |
675 |
|||||
|
Other financial liabilities |
210 |
232 |
|||||
|
Deferred tax |
364 |
241 |
|||||
|
Total liabilities |
6,026 |
6,431 |
|||||
|
Equity |
|||||||
|
Capital |
3,597 |
3,498 |
|||||
|
Retained earnings |
9,220 |
9,699 |
|||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(903) |
(1,191) |
|||||
|
Total equity |
11,914 |
12,006 |
|||||
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow |
|||||||
|
(millions of |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||||
|
Three Months Ended |
Year Ended |
||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
||||
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|||||||
|
Operating activities |
|||||||
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Adjustments for: |
|||||||
|
Depreciation |
28 |
26 |
111 |
113 |
|||
|
Amortization of software |
187 |
160 |
721 |
618 |
|||
|
Amortization of other identifiable intangible assets |
25 |
22 |
98 |
91 |
|||
|
Share of post-tax losses (earnings) in equity method investments |
5 |
5 |
28 |
(40) |
|||
|
Net gains on disposals of businesses and investments |
(1) |
(195) |
(165) |
(192) |
|||
|
Deferred tax |
9 |
47 |
60 |
(640) |
|||
|
Other |
49 |
(22) |
272 |
151 |
|||
|
Changes in working capital and other items |
122 |
(76) |
43 |
176 |
|||
|
Operating cash flows from continuing operations |
757 |
574 |
2,651 |
2,469 |
|||
|
Operating cash flows from discontinued operations |
(1) |
(10) |
– |
(12) |
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
756 |
564 |
2,651 |
2,457 |
|||
|
Investing activities |
|||||||
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(20) |
(130) |
(843) |
(622) |
|||
|
Proceeds related to disposals of businesses and investments |
2 |
297 |
254 |
326 |
|||
|
Proceeds from sales of LSEG shares |
– |
– |
– |
1,854 |
|||
|
Capital expenditures |
(158) |
(161) |
(634) |
(607) |
|||
|
Other investing activities |
– |
40 |
1 |
46 |
|||
|
Taxes paid on sales of LSEG shares and disposals |
(29) |
(115) |
(62) |
(317) |
|||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(205) |
(69) |
(1,284) |
680 |
|||
|
Financing activities |
|||||||
|
Repayments of debt |
– |
– |
(999) |
(290) |
|||
|
Net (repayments) borrowings under short-term loan facilities |
(49) |
– |
290 |
(139) |
|||
|
Payments of lease principal |
(16) |
(17) |
(64) |
(63) |
|||
|
Repurchases of common shares |
(330) |
– |
(1,000) |
(639) |
|||
|
Dividends paid on preference shares |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
(5) |
|||
|
Dividends paid on common shares |
(256) |
(236) |
(1,035) |
(944) |
|||
|
Purchase of non-controlling interests |
– |
– |
– |
(384) |
|||
|
Other financing activities |
(6) |
2 |
(16) |
5 |
|||
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
(658) |
(252) |
(2,828) |
(2,459) |
|||
|
Translation adjustments |
– |
(6) |
4 |
(8) |
|||
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(107) |
237 |
(1,457) |
670 |
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
618 |
1,731 |
1,968 |
1,298 |
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
Reconciliation of Earnings from Continuing Operations to Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|||||
|
(millions of |
|||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||
|
Three months ended |
Year ended |
||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
||
|
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to remove: |
|||||
|
Tax expense (benefit) |
158 |
135 |
423 |
(123) |
|
|
Other finance costs (income) |
4 |
(53) |
55 |
(45) |
|
|
Net interest expense |
40 |
28 |
143 |
125 |
|
|
Amortization of other identifiable intangible assets |
25 |
22 |
98 |
91 |
|
|
Amortization of software |
187 |
160 |
721 |
618 |
|
|
Depreciation |
28 |
26 |
111 |
113 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to remove: |
|||||
|
Share of post-tax losses (earnings) in equity method investments |
5 |
5 |
28 |
(40) |
|
|
Other operating gains, net |
(2) |
(204) |
(164) |
(144) |
|
|
Fair value adjustments* |
(1) |
(8) |
38 |
(8) |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) |
38.7 % |
37.6 % |
39.2 % |
38.2 % |
|
|
* Fair value adjustments primarily represent gains or losses due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on intercompany balances that arise in the ordinary course of business, which are a component of operating expenses, as well as adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue. |
|
|
|||||
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow(1) |
|||||
|
(millions of |
|||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||
|
Three months ended |
Year ended |
||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
(158) |
(161) |
(634) |
(607) |
|
|
Other investing activities |
– |
40 |
1 |
46 |
|
|
Payments of lease principal |
(16) |
(17) |
(64) |
(63) |
|
|
Dividends paid on preference shares |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
|
Free cash flow(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Reconciliation of Capital Expenditures to Accrued Capital Expenditures(1) |
|||||||
|
(millions of |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||||
|
Year ended |
|||||||
|
2025 |
|||||||
|
Capital expenditures |
|
||||||
|
Remove: IFRS adjustment to cash basis |
(18) |
||||||
|
Accrued capital expenditures(1) |
|
||||||
|
Accrued capital expenditures as a percentage of revenues(1) |
8.2 % |
||||||
|
(1) Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
|
|||||
|
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Adjusted Earnings(1) |
|||||
|
Reconciliation of Total Change in Adjusted EPS to Change in Constant Currency(1) |
|||||
|
(millions of |
|||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||
|
Three months ended |
Year ended |
||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
||
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to remove: |
|||||
|
Fair value adjustments* |
(1) |
(8) |
38 |
(8) |
|
|
Amortization of acquired software |
53 |
38 |
206 |
147 |
|
|
Amortization of other identifiable intangible assets |
25 |
22 |
98 |
91 |
|
|
Other operating gains, net |
(2) |
(204) |
(164) |
(144) |
|
|
Other finance costs (income) |
4 |
(53) |
55 |
(45) |
|
|
Share of post-tax losses (earnings) in equity method investments |
5 |
5 |
28 |
(40) |
|
|
Tax on above items(1) |
(5) |
36 |
(35) |
(9) |
|
|
Tax items impacting comparability(1) |
66 |
5 |
57 |
(478) |
|
|
Loss (earnings) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
1 |
20 |
(19) |
(15) |
|
|
Interim period effective tax rate normalization(1) |
2 |
7 |
– |
– |
|
|
Dividends declared on preference shares |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
(5) |
|
|
Adjusted earnings(1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EPS(1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change |
6 % |
4 % |
|||
|
Foreign currency |
-1 % |
0 % |
|||
|
Constant currency |
7 % |
4 % |
|||
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares (millions) |
445.6 |
450.6 |
449.5 |
451.2 |
|
|
Reconciliation of Effective Tax Rate on Adjusted Earnings(1) |
Year ended |
||||||
|
2025 |
|||||||
|
Adjusted earnings |
|
||||||
|
Plus: Dividends declared on preference shares |
4 |
||||||
|
Plus: Tax expense on adjusted earnings |
401 |
||||||
|
Pre-tax adjusted earnings |
|
||||||
|
IFRS tax expense |
|
||||||
|
Remove tax related to: |
|||||||
|
Amortization of acquired software |
46 |
||||||
|
Amortization of other identifiable intangible assets |
23 |
||||||
|
Share of post-tax losses in equity method investments |
2 |
||||||
|
Other finance costs |
2 |
||||||
|
Other operating gains, net |
(43) |
||||||
|
Other items |
5 |
||||||
|
Subtotal – Remove tax benefit on pre-tax items removed from adjusted earnings |
35 |
||||||
|
Remove: Tax items impacting comparability |
(57) |
||||||
|
Total – Remove all items impacting comparability |
(22) |
||||||
|
Tax expense on adjusted earnings |
|
||||||
|
Effective tax rate on adjusted earnings |
18.5 % |
||||||
|
*Fair value adjustments primarily represent gains or losses due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on intercompany balances that arise in the ordinary course of business, which are a component of operating expenses, as well as adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue. |
|
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
(2) |
The adjusted earnings impact of non-controlling interests, which was applicable to the year-ended |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Reconciliation of Changes in Revenues to Changes in Revenues on a Constant Currency(1) and Organic Basis(1) |
||||||||||||||
|
(millions of |
||||||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||||||
|
Three months ended |
Change |
|||||||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Foreign |
SUBTOTAL |
Net |
Organic |
||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
1 % |
0 % |
1 % |
-8 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
496 |
458 |
8 % |
1 % |
7 % |
-2 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
414 |
366 |
13 % |
0 % |
13 % |
2 % |
11 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
1,648 |
1,553 |
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
-4 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
232 |
218 |
7 % |
1 % |
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
|||||||
|
Global Print |
136 |
144 |
-6 % |
0 % |
-6 % |
0 % |
-6 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(7) |
(6) |
||||||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
5 % |
1 % |
5 % |
-3 % |
7 % |
|||||||
|
Recurring Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
1 % |
0 % |
1 % |
-7 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
434 |
401 |
8 % |
1 % |
7 % |
-2 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
357 |
319 |
12 % |
0 % |
12 % |
0 % |
12 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
1,507 |
1,427 |
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
-4 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
183 |
173 |
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
1 % |
4 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(7) |
(6) |
||||||||||||
|
Total Recurring Revenues |
|
|
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
-4 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Transactions Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
0 % |
-1 % |
0 % |
-28 % |
28 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
62 |
57 |
9 % |
2 % |
7 % |
0 % |
7 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
57 |
47 |
20 % |
1 % |
19 % |
16 % |
3 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
141 |
126 |
11 % |
1 % |
10 % |
2 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
|
49 |
45 |
10 % |
1 % |
9 % |
2 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
Total Transactions Revenues |
|
|
11 % |
1 % |
10 % |
2 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
Growth percentages are computed using whole dollars. As a result, percentages calculated from reported amounts may differ from those presented, and growth components may not total due to rounding. |
|
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Reconciliation of Changes in Revenues to Changes in Revenues on a Constant Currency(1) and Organic Basis(1) |
||||||||||||||
|
(millions of |
||||||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||||||
|
Year ended |
Change |
|||||||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Foreign |
SUBTOTAL |
Net |
Organic |
||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
-2 % |
0 % |
-2 % |
-10 % |
8 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
1,987 |
1,844 |
8 % |
0 % |
7 % |
-1 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
1,302 |
1,165 |
12 % |
-1 % |
13 % |
3 % |
11 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
6,157 |
5,931 |
4 % |
0 % |
4 % |
-5 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
853 |
832 |
3 % |
1 % |
2 % |
1 % |
1 % |
|||||||
|
Global Print |
490 |
519 |
-6 % |
0 % |
-5 % |
0 % |
-5 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(24) |
(24) |
||||||||||||
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
3 % |
0 % |
3 % |
-4 % |
7 % |
|||||||
|
Recurring Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
-1 % |
0 % |
-1 % |
-10 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
1,670 |
1,543 |
8 % |
0 % |
8 % |
-2 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
937 |
867 |
8 % |
-2 % |
10 % |
0 % |
10 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
5,396 |
5,238 |
3 % |
0 % |
3 % |
-6 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
712 |
668 |
7 % |
1 % |
6 % |
1 % |
5 % |
|||||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(24) |
(24) |
||||||||||||
|
Total Recurring Revenues |
|
|
3 % |
0 % |
3 % |
-5 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
Transactions Revenues |
||||||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
-16 % |
1 % |
-17 % |
-21 % |
4 % |
|||||||
|
Corporates |
317 |
301 |
5 % |
0 % |
5 % |
0 % |
5 % |
|||||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
365 |
298 |
22 % |
0 % |
23 % |
10 % |
12 % |
|||||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
761 |
693 |
10 % |
0 % |
10 % |
1 % |
9 % |
|||||||
|
|
141 |
164 |
-14 % |
1 % |
-15 % |
0 % |
-16 % |
|||||||
|
Total Transactions Revenues |
|
|
5 % |
0 % |
5 % |
1 % |
4 % |
|||||||
|
Growth percentages are computed using whole dollars. As a result, percentages calculated from reported amounts may differ from those presented, and growth components may not total due to rounding. |
|
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reconciliation of Changes in Adjusted EBITDA (1) and Related Margin(1) to Changes on a Constant Currency Basis(1) |
||||||||||
|
(millions of |
||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||
|
Three months ended |
Change |
|||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Foreign |
Constant |
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
9 % |
0 % |
9 % |
|||||
|
Corporates |
160 |
153 |
4 % |
0 % |
4 % |
|||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
222 |
196 |
14 % |
1 % |
13 % |
|||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
709 |
648 |
9 % |
0 % |
9 % |
|||||
|
|
48 |
45 |
7 % |
-5 % |
12 % |
|||||
|
Global Print |
54 |
55 |
-2 % |
0 % |
-2 % |
|||||
|
Corporate costs |
(34) |
(30) |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
8 % |
0 % |
8 % |
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) |
||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
44.3 % |
41.0 % |
330bp |
-20bp |
350bp |
|||||
|
Corporates |
32.2 % |
33.5 % |
-130bp |
-60bp |
-70bp |
|||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
53.6 % |
53.4 % |
20bp |
20bp |
0bp |
|||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
43.0 % |
41.7 % |
130bp |
-20bp |
150bp |
|||||
|
|
21.0 % |
20.8 % |
20bp |
-120bp |
140bp |
|||||
|
Global Print |
39.6 % |
38.2 % |
140bp |
-20bp |
160bp |
|||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
38.7 % |
37.6 % |
110bp |
-30bp |
140bp |
|||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
Reconciliation of Changes in Adjusted EBITDA (1) and Related Margin(1) to Changes on a Constant Currency Basis(1) |
||||||||||
|
(millions of |
||||||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||||
|
Year ended |
Change |
|||||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
Total |
Foreign |
Constant |
||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
4 % |
1 % |
3 % |
|||||
|
Corporates |
716 |
671 |
7 % |
0 % |
6 % |
|||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
623 |
527 |
18 % |
0 % |
19 % |
|||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
2,695 |
2,500 |
8 % |
0 % |
7 % |
|||||
|
|
174 |
196 |
-11 % |
-1 % |
-11 % |
|||||
|
Global Print |
185 |
188 |
-2 % |
1 % |
-2 % |
|||||
|
Corporate costs |
(118) |
(105) |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
|||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
6 % |
0 % |
5 % |
|||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1) |
||||||||||
|
Legal Professionals |
47.3 % |
44.6 % |
270bp |
20bp |
250bp |
|||||
|
Corporates |
36.0 % |
36.3 % |
-30bp |
0bp |
-30bp |
|||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
47.1 % |
45.2 % |
190bp |
40bp |
150bp |
|||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
43.6 % |
42.1 % |
150bp |
20bp |
130bp |
|||||
|
|
20.4 % |
23.6 % |
-320bp |
-30bp |
-290bp |
|||||
|
Global Print |
37.7 % |
36.2 % |
150bp |
30bp |
120bp |
|||||
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA Margin |
39.2 % |
38.2 % |
100bp |
20bp |
80bp |
|||||
|
n/a: not applicable |
|
|
Growth percentages and margins are computed using whole dollars. As a result, percentages and margins calculated from reported amounts may differ from those presented, and growth components may not total due to rounding. |
|
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
To compute segment and consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin, the company excludes fair value adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue from its IFRS revenues. The charts below reconcile IFRS revenues to revenues used in the calculation of adjusted EBITDA margin, which excludes fair value adjustments related to acquired deferred revenue.
|
Three months ended |
|||||||||
|
(millions of |
IFRS |
Remove fair |
Revenues |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
– |
|
|
44.3 % |
||||
|
Corporates |
496 |
– |
496 |
160 |
32.2 % |
||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
414 |
– |
414 |
222 |
53.6 % |
||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
1,648 |
– |
1,648 |
709 |
43.0 % |
||||
|
|
232 |
– |
232 |
48 |
21.0 % |
||||
|
Global Print |
136 |
– |
136 |
54 |
39.6 % |
||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(7) |
– |
(7) |
– |
n/a |
||||
|
Corporate costs |
– |
– |
– |
(34) |
n/a |
||||
|
Consolidated totals |
|
– |
|
|
38.7 % |
||||
|
Year ended |
|||||||||
|
(millions of |
IFRS |
Remove fair |
Revenues |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
– |
|
|
47.3 % |
||||
|
Corporates |
1,987 |
– |
1,987 |
716 |
36.0 % |
||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
1,302 |
|
1,322 |
623 |
47.1 % |
||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
6,157 |
20 |
6,177 |
2,695 |
43.6 % |
||||
|
|
853 |
– |
853 |
174 |
20.4 % |
||||
|
Global Print |
490 |
– |
490 |
185 |
37.7 % |
||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(24) |
– |
(24) |
– |
n/a |
||||
|
Corporate costs |
– |
– |
– |
(118) |
n/a |
||||
|
Consolidated totals |
|
|
|
|
39.2 % |
||||
|
Three months ended |
|||||||||
|
(millions of |
IFRS |
Remove fair |
Revenues |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
– |
|
|
41.0 % |
||||
|
Corporates |
458 |
|
459 |
153 |
33.5 % |
||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
366 |
– |
366 |
196 |
53.4 % |
||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
1,553 |
1 |
1,554 |
648 |
41.7 % |
||||
|
|
218 |
– |
218 |
45 |
20.8 % |
||||
|
Global Print |
144 |
– |
144 |
55 |
38.2 % |
||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(6) |
– |
(6) |
– |
n/a |
||||
|
Corporate costs |
– |
– |
– |
(30) |
n/a |
||||
|
Consolidated totals |
|
|
|
|
37.6 % |
||||
|
n/a: not applicable |
|
|
Margins are computed using whole dollars, as a result, margins calculated from reported amounts may differ from those presented due to rounding. |
|
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
|
|||||||||
|
Year ended |
|||||||||
|
(millions of |
IFRS |
Remove fair |
Revenues |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
||||
|
Legal Professionals |
|
|
|
|
44.6 % |
||||
|
Corporates |
1,844 |
6 |
1,850 |
671 |
36.3 % |
||||
|
Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals |
1,165 |
– |
1,165 |
527 |
45.2 % |
||||
|
“Big 3” Segments Combined(1) |
5,931 |
7 |
5,938 |
2,500 |
42.1 % |
||||
|
|
832 |
2 |
834 |
196 |
23.6 % |
||||
|
Global Print |
519 |
– |
519 |
188 |
36.2 % |
||||
|
Eliminations/Rounding |
(24) |
– |
(24) |
– |
n/a |
||||
|
Corporate costs |
– |
– |
– |
(105) |
n/a |
||||
|
Consolidated totals |
|
|
|
|
38.2 % |
||||
|
n/a: not applicable |
|
Margins are computed using whole dollars, as a result, margins calculated from reported amounts may differ from those presented due to rounding. |
|
|
|||||||
|
Reconciliation of Net Debt(1) and Leverage Ratio of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|||||||
|
(millions of |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
|||||||
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
|
2025 |
2024 |
||||||
|
Current indebtedness |
|
|
|||||
|
Long-term indebtedness |
1,328 |
1,847 |
|||||
|
Total debt |
2,123 |
2,820 |
|||||
|
Swaps |
16 |
21 |
|||||
|
Total debt after swaps |
2,139 |
2,841 |
|||||
|
Remove fair value adjustments for hedges |
(2) |
5 |
|||||
|
Total debt after hedging arrangements |
2,137 |
2,846 |
|||||
|
Collateral assets |
(7) |
– |
|||||
|
Remove transaction costs, premiums or discounts, included in the carrying value of debt |
28 |
22 |
|||||
|
Add: Lease liabilities (current and non-current) |
249 |
256 |
|||||
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalents |
(511) |
(1,968) |
|||||
|
Net debt |
|
|
|||||
|
Leverage ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA |
|||||||
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
|||||
|
Net debt/adjusted EBITDA |
0.6:1 |
0.4:1 |
|||||
|
(1) |
Refer to page 21 for additional information on non-IFRS financial measures. |
|
Non-IFRS |
Definition |
Why Useful to the Company and Investors |
|
Adjusted EBITDA and the related margin |
Represents earnings or losses from continuing operations before tax expense or benefit, net interest expense, other finance costs or income, depreciation, amortization of software and other identifiable intangible assets, |
Provides a consistent basis to evaluate operating profitability and performance trends by excluding items that the company does not consider to be controllable activities for this purpose. Also, represents a measure commonly reported and widely used by investors as a valuation metric, as well as to assess the company’s ability to incur and service debt. |
|
Adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS |
Net earnings or loss including dividends declared on preference shares but excluding the post-tax impacts of fair value adjustments, including those related to acquired deferred revenue, amortization of acquired intangible assets (attributable to other identifiable intangible assets and acquired software), other operating gains and losses, certain asset impairment charges, other finance costs or income,
The post-tax amount of each item is excluded from adjusted earnings based on the specific tax rules and tax rates associated with the nature and jurisdiction of each item.
Adjusted EPS is calculated from adjusted earnings using diluted weighted-average shares and does not represent actual earnings or loss per share attributable to shareholders. |
Provides a more comparable basis to analyze earnings.
These measures are commonly used by shareholders to measure performance.
|
|
Effective tax rate on adjusted earnings |
Adjusted tax expense divided by pre-tax adjusted earnings. Adjusted tax expense is computed as income tax expense or benefit plus or minus the income tax impacts of all items impacting adjusted earnings (as described above), and other tax items impacting comparability.
In interim periods, the company also makes an adjustment to reflect income taxes based on the estimated full-year effective tax rate. Earnings or losses for interim periods under IFRS reflect income taxes based on the estimated effective tax rates of each of the jurisdictions in which |
Provides a basis to analyze the effective tax rate associated with adjusted earnings.
The company’s effective tax rate computed in accordance with IFRS may be more volatile by quarter because the geographical mix of pre-tax profits and losses in interim periods may be different from that for the full year. Therefore, the company believes that using the expected full-year effective tax rate provides more comparability among interim periods. |
|
Free cash flow |
Net cash provided by operating activities and other investing activities, less capital expenditures, payments of lease principal and dividends paid on the company’s preference shares. |
Helps assess the company’s ability, over the long term, to create value for its shareholders as it represents cash available to repay debt, pay common dividends, fund share repurchases and acquisitions. |
|
Changes before the impact of foreign currency or at constant currency |
The changes in revenues, adjusted EBITDA and the related margin, and adjusted EPS before currency (at constant currency or excluding the effects of currency) are determined by converting the current and equivalent prior period’s local currency results using the same foreign currency exchange rate. |
Provides better comparability of business trends from period to period. |
|
Changes in revenues computed on an organic basis |
Represent changes in revenues of the company’s existing businesses at constant currency. The metric excludes the distortive impacts of acquisitions and dispositions from not owning the business in both comparable periods. |
Provides further insight into the performance of the company’s existing businesses by excluding distortive impacts and serves as a better measure of the company’s ability to grow its business over the long term. |
|
Accrued capital expenditures as a percentage of revenues |
Accrued capital expenditures divided by revenues, where accrued capital expenditures include amounts that remain unpaid at the end of the reporting period. For purposes of this calculation, revenues are before fair value adjustments to acquired deferred revenue. |
Reflects the basis on which the company manages capital expenditures for internal planning purposes.
|
|
“Big 3” segments |
The company’s combined Legal Professionals, Corporates and Tax, Audit & Accounting Professionals segments. All measures reported for the “Big 3” segments are non-IFRS financial measures. |
The “Big 3” segments comprised approximately 80% of revenues and represent the core of the company’s business information service product offerings. |
|
Net debt and leverage ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA |
Net debt is total debt, plus related hedging instruments and collateral balances, along with lease liabilities, excluding unamortized transaction costs and any premiums or discounts on debt, minus cash and cash equivalents. We exclude specific hedging components to reflect the net cash outflow upon debt maturity.
Net debt to adjusted EBITDA is net debt divided by adjusted EBITDA for the previous twelve-month period ending with the current fiscal quarter.
|
Provides a commonly used measure of a company’s leverage and its ability to pay its debt. Given that the company hedges some of its debt to manage risk, the company includes hedging instruments as it believes it provides a better measure of the total obligation associated with its outstanding debt. Since the company plans to hold its debt and related hedges until maturity, the net debt calculation is adjusted to reflect the net cash outflow at maturity, after deducting cash and cash equivalents.
The company’s non-IFRS measure is aligned with the calculation of its internal target leverage ratio and is more conservative than the maximum ratio allowed under the contractual covenants in its credit facility. |
|
Please refer to reconciliations for the most directly comparable IFRS financial measures. |
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/thomson-reuters-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2025-results-302680103.html
SOURCE Thomson Reuters
Business
Fresenius Medical Care Shares Drop After Outlook Underwhelms
Fresenius Medical Care FME -0.10%decrease; red down pointing triangle shares fell after the German dialysis specialist forecast flattish revenue and adjusted earnings in the year ahead amid regulatory headwinds.
Shares in Fresenius Medical Care were down 5.9% in European midday trading Tuesday, having fallen around 10% earlier. The decline erased the stock’s gains since the start of 2026.
Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8
Business
Faisal Islam: Is Reeves right in saying we're turning a corner?
The Chancellor is trying to use this moment as a launching pad for a wider attempt to gee up consumer and business confidence.
Business
Slideshow: Formulating frozen food innovations

New product launches focus on healthier ingredients and global flavors.
Business
Heston Blumenthal’s restaurant empire under threat after HMRC winding-up petition
The future of The Fat Duck and other restaurants founded by Heston Blumenthal is in doubt after HM Revenue & Customs issued a winding-up petition against the chef’s parent company.
HMRC has moved against SL6 Ltd, which owns The Fat Duck in Bray, Berkshire, alongside the one-Michelin-starred The Hinds Head and several affiliated ventures. Around 130 staff are understood to be at risk should the petition proceed.
The action follows a further deterioration in the group’s finances. Accounts filed at Companies House show SL6 Ltd recorded a loss of £2.05m for the year to 2024, up from £1.39m the previous year, despite turnover of £8.9m.
Administrative expenses totalled £8.4m, including £2.3m in cost of sales, while staff costs rose to £4.07m, reflecting inflationary pressure and higher wage bills.
The company’s accounts reveal total debts of £2.7m, including £1.67m owed in taxation and social security and £5,417 in corporation tax. It also reported a bank overdraft of £806,091, more than the £697,605 held in cash, alongside several outstanding bank loans.
A strategic report signed by Ronald Lowenthal, who now controls SL6 Ltd after Blumenthal sold his stake in 2006, acknowledged a year of “tough economic conditions”, citing inflation across the supply chain, recruitment challenges and rising wage costs.
Lowenthal said the company had chosen not to pass the full burden of inflation on to customers, despite the impact on profitability. The Fat Duck’s signature 13-course tasting menu, “The Journey”, is currently priced at £350 per head.
Auditors Lawfords Consulting previously described the business as a “going concern”, noting management was seeking long-term funding to stabilise operations. However, HMRC’s decision to file a winding-up petition suggests negotiations may not have secured sufficient support.
A spokesperson for HMRC said it could not comment on individual cases but added that winding-up petitions are only filed after other recovery options have been exhausted.
The development comes at a difficult time for the UK hospitality sector, which has faced rising energy bills, food inflation and higher employment costs in recent years. Fine dining establishments have been particularly exposed to fluctuations in discretionary spending.
The timing is also notable given fresh political debate around the value of the hospitality sector. Comments this week from a senior government adviser suggesting Britain does not “need any more restaurants” have drawn criticism from industry figures already grappling with higher taxes and regulatory pressures.
Blumenthal, famed for inventive dishes such as snail porridge and “Sound of the Sea”, became one of Britain’s most recognisable chefs through The Fat Duck’s experimental cuisine and television appearances. The restaurant has long been regarded as a cornerstone of modern British gastronomy.
If the winding-up petition proceeds and the company cannot secure funding or reach a settlement with HMRC, the case could result in compulsory liquidation, placing one of Britain’s most celebrated culinary brands in jeopardy, however a spokesperson for SL6 Limited, has said: “This was an administrative oversight during our transition to a new accounting system, which we are working to resolve. Our restaurants are busier than ever, and there will be no impact on our operations. From our side, it is business as usual.”
Business
Cisco Systems (CSCO) Stock Steady Near $64.50 After Record Q2 FY2026 Revenue Beat, AI Orders Surge
Cisco Systems Inc.’s stock held firm near $64.50 in late February 2026, closing at $64.48 on February 24 after a 0.78% gain, as the networking giant continued to benefit from strong demand for AI infrastructure, a solid second-quarter earnings beat, and a 3% dividend increase announced earlier in the month.

As of February 24, 2026, Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) traded in a session range of $63.92 to $64.85 with volume of approximately 18.4 million shares. The shares have risen about 12% year-to-date in 2026, trading near the upper end of their 52-week range from $44.50 to $65.20. Market capitalization stands around $260 billion, reflecting investor confidence in Cisco’s transition toward high-growth areas such as AI networking, security, and observability.
The recent stability follows Cisco’s second-quarter fiscal 2026 results released February 12, 2026 (for the quarter ended January 25, 2026). The company reported revenue of $14.0 billion, down 6% year-over-year but beating analyst expectations of $13.7 billion. Adjusted earnings per share reached $0.96, topping consensus estimates of $0.92. Product orders grew 11% year-over-year, driven by strong demand for AI-related networking solutions, while remaining performance obligations (RPO) increased 18% to a record $42.3 billion.
CEO Chuck Robbins highlighted the acceleration of AI infrastructure deployments as a key driver, with networking orders up significantly due to hyperscaler and enterprise investments in AI data centers. Security revenue grew 8%, and observability products continued gaining traction. The company noted improved supply chain dynamics and a shift toward software and subscription models, which contributed to gross margin expansion to 68.4% on an adjusted basis.
On February 12, Cisco announced a 3% increase in its quarterly dividend to $0.41 per share, payable April 23, 2026, to shareholders of record April 2. The move underscores the company’s strong cash generation and commitment to shareholder returns, with a current yield around 2.5%. Cisco also repurchased $2.5 billion in stock during the quarter under its ongoing authorization.
Analysts remain predominantly bullish. Consensus among 25-30 firms rates CSCO a Moderate Buy to Buy, with average 12-month price targets around $68 to $72—implying 5-12% upside from current levels. High targets reach $80 from firms like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, citing AI tailwinds and margin expansion. Some caution persists around legacy product declines and competition from Arista Networks and others in high-speed switching for AI clusters.
Cisco guided for third-quarter fiscal 2026 revenue of $13.6 billion to $13.8 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.83 to $0.85, aligning with or slightly above consensus. Management emphasized continued AI networking momentum, security resilience, and progress toward its $1 billion annualized run rate target for observability products.
The company continues investing heavily in AI, including silicon advancements through its Silicon One platform and partnerships with hyperscalers for next-generation data center fabrics. Recent announcements include expanded collaboration with NVIDIA on AI infrastructure and new observability tools for generative AI workloads.
Challenges include a transitional period in traditional enterprise networking, where some customers delay upgrades amid economic uncertainty. However, Cisco’s diversified portfolio—spanning networking, security, collaboration (Webex), and observability—provides resilience. The shift toward software and recurring revenue streams supports improving margins and predictability.
The next earnings report, for third-quarter fiscal 2026, is expected in mid-May 2026. Investors will scrutinize AI order trends, security growth, margin progress, and any updates on full-year guidance or strategic initiatives.
Cisco Systems, a foundational player in global networking, has successfully pivoted toward AI-driven opportunities while maintaining strong cash flow and shareholder returns. Record RPO, dividend growth, and AI tailwinds position the company for sustained performance in 2026, even as legacy segments face headwinds. With shares trading at attractive multiples relative to historical averages and peers, Cisco remains a core holding for investors seeking exposure to AI infrastructure and enterprise technology.
Business
DNA Evidence Degraded, Desert Backpack Ruled Out
Authorities investigating the disappearance of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie acknowledged February 26, 2026, that DNA evidence recovered from her Catalina Foothills home may be “unusable” due to degradation or contamination, while confirming that a backpack found miles away has no connection to the case, as the search for the missing mother of NBC “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie entered its 26th day with no new arrests or major breakthroughs.

AFP
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos provided the updates during a brief media briefing, stating that forensic analysis of blood drops found on the front porch and other samples from inside the residence has yielded inconclusive or degraded results. “Some of the DNA evidence is not usable at this time due to environmental factors and the age of the samples,” Nanos said. “We continue to work with state and federal labs to explore any additional testing options, but we are not relying solely on DNA to move the investigation forward.”
The sheriff also addressed persistent speculation about a backpack discovered in a nearby desert area shortly after Guthrie vanished on February 1. “The backpack recovered early in the search has been fully processed and ruled out as related to this case,” Nanos confirmed. “It does not match the description provided by the surveillance footage, and no forensic links were found.” The clarification follows weeks of public theories tying the item to the suspect seen on Nancy Guthrie’s Nest doorbell camera.
The suspect, captured in black-and-white footage released by the FBI on February 10, is described as a male approximately 5 feet 9 inches to 5 feet 10 inches tall with an average build. He wore a balaclava, gloves, and carried a 25-liter Ozark Trail “Hiker Pack” backpack while approaching the door with a holstered firearm visible. Sources told ABC News and NBC News on February 23–24 that some released images show the individual without the backpack or gun, prompting speculation of multiple visits to the property. Sheriff Nanos reiterated February 26 that the photos lack date or time stamps, calling any conclusion about separate dates “purely speculative.”
Investigators have canvassed thousands of hours of surveillance footage from the greater Tucson area and requested additional recordings from neighbors, with particular emphasis on January 11 (9 p.m.–midnight) and January 31 (9:30 a.m.–11 a.m.). A neighbor, Aldine Meister, told Fox News Digital on February 25 that she observed a “suspicious” younger man walking in the neighborhood about two weeks before the disappearance. “He didn’t have your typical walking gear on, and he had his hat pulled really far over his eyes,” Meister said. “He just didn’t fit.” She reported the sighting to authorities after the case became public.
The family, led by Savannah Guthrie, announced a reward of up to $1 million for information leading to Nancy Guthrie’s recovery, matching FBI criteria for payment. Savannah shared an emotional video on Instagram February 24, saying, “We still believe in a miracle, we still believe that she can come home — hope against hope.” She acknowledged the possibility that her mother “may be lost” or “already be gone,” but urged anyone with information to contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI or tips.fbi.gov, or submit tips anonymously through 88-Crime.
The FBI continues offering up to $50,000 for information leading to recovery and the arrest of those responsible, while 88-Crime provides an additional $102,500 reward. The agency has received thousands of tips since releasing the suspect footage, though officials have not confirmed any credible ransom demands or bitcoin-related communications reported by some media outlets.
Nancy Guthrie was last seen on the evening of January 31 after her son-in-law dropped her off following dinner. She failed to join a scheduled virtual church service the next morning, prompting family concern. Blood drops on the porch and tampering with the doorbell camera suggest foul play. All immediate family members, including Savannah Guthrie and her siblings, have been cleared as suspects.
The quiet, affluent Catalina Foothills neighborhood remains on edge, with residents placing flowers and notes outside the home. The area’s spaced-out properties, dark skies, and limited surveillance have hindered progress. Investigators continue forensic work, digital analysis, and canvassing while limiting public updates to significant developments to preserve resources.
As the case stretches into its fourth week, the Guthrie family and authorities maintain hope that new leads will emerge. Anyone with information is urged to contact the FBI or Pima County Sheriff’s Department. The investigation remains active and ongoing, with no persons of interest publicly identified and no arrests made.
Business
Trump announces $1,000 retirement plan match for American workers
BlackRock Global Head of Retirement Solutions Nick Nefouse announces a new plan to expand retirement investment options on Varney & Co.
President Donald Trump on Tuesday outlined a new retirement plan that would see the federal government match a portion of the contributions made by American workers to retirement plans that aren’t matched by their employers.
Trump discussed the proposal during his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, when he said that the federal government will start providing up to $1,000 in matching contributions to the retirement plans of workers whose employers aren’t providing a match.
“Since I took office, the typical 401(k) balance is up by at least $30,000. That’s a lot of money,” Trump said. “We have millions and millions of people, because the stock market has done so well, setting all those records – your 401(k)s are way up. Yet half of all working Americans still do not have access to a retirement plan with matching contributions from an employer.”
“To remedy this gross disparity, I’m announcing that next year, my administration will give these often forgotten American workers – great people, the people that built our country – access to the same type of retirement plan offered to every federal worker. We will match your contribution with up to $1,000 each year, as we ensure that all Americans can profit from a rising stock market,” the president said.
THE TYPICAL AMERICAN WORKER HAS JUST $955 SAVED FOR RETIREMENT, STUDY SHOWS

President Donald Trump unveiled a new retirement plan for Americans during his State of the Union address. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Trump’s proposal would build off an existing federal policy that allows the government to make a matching contribution to private sector workers’ retirement plans if they meet certain income criteria.
A bipartisan law known as the SECURE 2.0 Act was signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022 and created a Saver’s Match that would match 50% of retirement contributions made by eligible workers up to $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for couples starting in 2027.
HERE’S HOW MUCH TRUMP ACCOUNT BALANCES COULD GROW OVER TIME

The federal retirement match would apply to a variety of low-cost index funds. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)
Under the SECURE 2.0 Act, the Saver’s Match would be distributed through a federal tax credit deposited directly into a qualified pre-tax retirement account, such as a traditional IRA or traditional 401(k), though after-tax accounts like the Roth IRA or Roth 401(k) wouldn’t be eligible to receive the funds.
The existing Saver’s Match phases out for income in the $20,501 to $35,500 range for single filers, $30,751 to $53,250 for heads of households, and $41,001 to $71,000 for married couples filing jointly.
IRS REVEALS UPDATED RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION LIMITS FOR 2026

The White House’s plan builds on an existing match scheduled to take effect in 2027. (iStock)
The White House indicated that the president’s proposal would have a similar structure to the Thrift Savings Plan that federal employees can enroll in, which allows them to invest in several low-cost index funds, including U.S. Treasury bonds, an aggregate U.S. bond fund, the S&P 500, a U.S. total stock market index, and an international stock index that excludes China and Hong Kong.
A 2025 analysis by the Pew Charitable Trusts found that almost 57 million American workers – which amounts to almost half of the private sector workforce – don’t receive retirement benefits through their workplace.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Pew’s analysis estimated that the cost to federal and state governments of Americans’ insufficient retirement savings would amount to $1.3 trillion over a 20-year period, as insufficient retirement savings decreases household spending and increases demand on social assistance programs that can strain a shrinking tax base.
Business
Jack in the Box launches matcha

The matcha line includes a latte and a shake.
Business
John Lewis pulls plug on build-to-rent venture amid retail reset
John Lewis Partnership has abandoned its build-to-rent housing ambitions, retreating from a high-profile property diversification strategy as the group pivots back towards its core retail business.
The employee-owned retailer confirmed it would withdraw from the rental housing scheme first championed by its former chair, Sharon White, who had sought to reduce reliance on retail by generating 40 per cent of profits from non-retail ventures by 2030. That target was later scrapped.
The build-to-rent initiative, launched in partnership with Aberdeen, aimed to deliver around 1,000 rental homes across sites in Ealing and Bromley in London and Reading in Berkshire. Aberdeen had pledged to raise £500m from institutional investors to fund the developments.
However, John Lewis said that the funds were never secured due to shifting macroeconomic conditions.
“Our rental property ambition was based on a very different financial environment: one with more stable investment returns, lower borrowing costs and more affordable construction costs,” a spokesman said. “The current climate, higher interest rates, inflationary pressures and a more cautious property market, means the model no longer meets our investment criteria.”
The decision marks a significant strategic reset under Jason Tarry (pictured), the former Tesco executive who became chair in 2024. Tarry has sought to restore the partnership’s focus on retail performance after several years of financial strain and cancelled staff bonuses.
The group is now pursuing an £800m investment programme aimed at revitalising its department stores, alongside a £1bn investment in its Waitrose estate of 320 shops. Recent initiatives include a high-profile partnership to bring Topshop concessions into John Lewis stores as it seeks to win back younger customers.
The build-to-rent strategy had originally been positioned as a way to unlock value from surplus Waitrose land and car parks while creating a more stable, long-term income stream less exposed to retail volatility.
However, the proposals were controversial from the outset. Local communities and planning authorities raised concerns over building heights, density and the proportion of affordable housing. Although several schemes ultimately secured planning approval, in some cases after appeals and intervention by government inspectors, the projects required significant upfront investment.
While John Lewis has not disclosed how much has been spent to date, it is understood that several million pounds were invested in design, planning and legal costs before the scheme was halted.
The withdrawal underlines the pressure facing retailers that diversified into property during the era of low interest rates. Higher borrowing costs have eroded returns on residential development, while construction inflation has increased project risk.
For John Lewis, the move signals a return to fundamentals after what some critics inside and outside the partnership viewed as a distraction from its core business.
With the cost-of-living crisis squeezing consumer spending and competition intensifying across both fashion and grocery, the partnership is betting that renewed focus on shopkeeping, rather than landlord ambitions, offers a clearer path to restoring profitability and rebuilding confidence among its employee-owners.
Business
Wall Street Eyes AI Demand
NVIDIA Corp. faces one of its most anticipated quarterly reports on February 25, 2026, after market close, as investors scrutinize whether the AI chip leader can sustain explosive growth amid soaring expectations and a stock trading near $197 ahead of the release.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
As of February 25, 2026, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) shares traded around $196-$197 in pre-earnings activity, up modestly from the prior close of $192.85 on February 24. The stock has gained significantly in 2026, building on 2025’s massive rally driven by AI infrastructure demand. Market capitalization exceeds $4.7 trillion, making NVIDIA the world’s most valuable company by a wide margin.
The company is scheduled to release fiscal fourth-quarter 2026 results (ended January 25, 2026) after the bell, followed by a conference call at 5:00 p.m. ET. Wall Street consensus, compiled from Bloomberg, LSEG, and other sources, projects adjusted earnings per share of $1.53 and revenue of approximately $65.9 billion to $66.2 billion—a 68% year-over-year increase from $39.3 billion in the year-ago quarter. Data center revenue, the primary growth engine, is expected to reach $60.36 billion or higher, reflecting continued hyperscaler spending on AI accelerators.
Analysts anticipate another strong beat-and-raise quarter, marking potentially the 11th consecutive period of growth exceeding 55%. Gross margins are projected at around 75%, with adjusted operating income near $44.56 billion. The report arrives at a pivotal time for the broader market, where NVIDIA’s performance has become a proxy for the AI boom’s health. A solid beat could reinforce confidence in AI infrastructure plays, while any shortfall in guidance might spark volatility across tech stocks.
CEO Jensen Huang and CFO Colette Kress are expected to provide commentary on Blackwell GPU ramp-up, demand from major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and the upcoming Rubin architecture. Blackwell orders have reportedly crossed $350 billion in some estimates, with hyperscaler capex projected to hit $600 billion for 2026—much of it flowing to NVIDIA chips. The company faces scrutiny on whether AI spending remains robust or shows signs of moderation.
NVIDIA’s third-quarter fiscal 2026 results (reported November 19, 2025) set a high bar: record revenue of $57.0 billion (up 62% year-over-year), data center revenue of $51.2 billion (up 66%), and strong guidance for Q4 at $65.0 billion plus or minus 2%. That outlook has held firm, with some analysts raising estimates slightly in recent weeks.
The earnings call will also address supply chain dynamics, competition from AMD and custom silicon efforts by hyperscalers, and any updates on energy-efficient designs for next-generation AI workloads. Options markets have priced in a potential 5-6% stock swing post-earnings, reflecting the high stakes for a company whose moves often influence the S&P 500 and Nasdaq.
Analyst sentiment remains bullish overall. Consensus price targets sit well above current levels, with many firms highlighting NVIDIA’s dominance in AI accelerators and long-term secular tailwinds. However, valuation concerns persist—trading at around 41 times forward earnings in some calculations—amid worries about potential AI spending slowdowns or execution risks on Blackwell ramp.
NVIDIA’s trajectory in 2026 hinges on proving the AI supercycle endures. With the GTC 2026 event approaching in March, where major announcements are expected, the February 25 report serves as a critical checkpoint. A beat-and-raise scenario could propel shares higher, reinforcing the narrative of sustained hyperscaler demand, while any cautious guidance might trigger a pullback in a market increasingly sensitive to AI-related developments.
As the closing bell approaches, all eyes remain on NVIDIA to deliver clarity on the pace of AI infrastructure buildout and its implications for the broader tech sector.
-
Video6 days agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Politics4 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Sports2 days agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Politics2 days agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Sports7 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Crypto World2 days agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Business3 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Business3 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Entertainment7 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Tech1 day agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting
-
NewsBeat2 days ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
Tech3 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat3 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics3 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
NewsBeat22 hours agoPolice latest as search for missing woman enters day nine
-
Crypto World22 hours agoEntering new markets without increasing payment costs
-
Sports2 days ago
2026 NFL mock draft: WRs fly off the board in first round entering combine week
-
Crypto World6 days ago83% of Altcoins Enter Bear Trend as Liquidity Crunch Tightens Grip on Crypto Market
-
Business1 day agoTrue Citrus debuts functional drink mix collection
