A company boss has told MPs the industry is ‘teetering on the brink’
Henry Saker-Clark, Press Association Deputy Business Editor
07:41, 11 Feb 2026
The steel industry has faced a number of challenges in recent years, including a switch to a greener method of production at the huge plant in Port Talbot, South Wales, with the loss of jobs(Image: PA Wire/PA Images)
The Government has “two months to save the UK steel industry”, a director of the country’s biggest steel firm has warned. Russell Codling, director of markets business development at Tata Steel UK, warned MPs on Tuesday that the sector is “teetering on the brink” and needs urgent state support.
Advertisement
He told Parliament’s Business and Trade Committee that the sector is at threat due to fears of further cheap Chinese imports flooding the market.
“At the moment to date, whilst the UK Government is working very hard on this, we are not in a position to be protecting the UK industry, which is putting the UK steel industry at severe threat,” the boss said.
He called on the Government to follow the footsteps of the EU and US, with import tariffs designed to benefit regional steel sectors.
Currently, there are safeguards in place imposing a 25% tariff on specific imported steel products, but this expires in June.
Advertisement
Tata called for immediate action from the Government to announce a replacement system or extent the current safeguards.
Mr Codling added: “Frankly speaking, the UK Government has two months to save the UK steel industry because this is a death knell for the industry at large and its supply chains.
“If the UK doesn’t act we won’t have a steel industry not many months from now.
“We need action, we need action now, that needs to be in position by July 1.”
The restaurant sector has spent the past 18 months trying to figure out how to reach consumers in a hypercompetitive and uneven economy. McDonald’s, which is set to report earnings after the bell Wednesday, has doubled down on value messaging to customers via Extra Value Meals and Snack Wraps, which will likely help to boost sales this quarter.
But the focus on value has caused frustrations at times among parts of the chain’s operator base.
The company rolled out new franchise standards for McDonald’s operators on Jan. 1, including assessing locations on how their prices deliver value. McDonald’s said its owners are still able to set their own prices, but the standards nonetheless shape and define how franchisees — which operate 95% of McDonald’s restaurants — run their stores.
A cohort of operators is standing ground in their ability to independently set prices.
Advertisement
The National Owners Association, an independent franchisee advocate group, adopted a Franchisee Bill of Rights in August and circulated it in an email to members last month as the standards took effect, according to a copy of the message viewed by CNBC.
The last of the bill’s rights is the “right to set prices without fear of recourse,” which says, “Franchisees, as independent Owner/Operators, have the right to set menu prices for their restaurants based on their own business judgment and market conditions. This right exists irrespective of the pricing decisions of any national, regional, or local co-op or franchisor initiative. Franchisees must be free to manage their pricing strategy without fear of intimidation, or diminished support from McDonald’s or its affiliated entities.”
It also lists the “right to renewal and transfer,” giving owners the “absolute right to a fair and reasonable opportunity to renew franchise agreements … subject only to objective, clearly stated standards of approval.”
In December, McDonald’s told operators it would begin value assessments as part of its updates to franchising standards. Continued noncompliance could result in penalties or even termination.
Advertisement
At the time, the company said its new standards would provide “greater clarity … to ensure every restaurant delivers consistent, reliable value across the full customer experience,” according to a memo reviewed by CNBC.
In a statement, McDonald’s told CNBC that the business model creates the opportunity for entrepreneurs to be in business “for themselves, but never by themselves,” adding, “As franchisor, we have a responsibility to protect the strength and integrity of the brand and ensure every Owner/Operator upholds the standards that make McDonald’s so successful, for the benefit of all. This includes showing up for customers with great value – a core expectation the majority of our franchisees understand and proudly deliver.”
Some operators bristled at the changes in recent Wall Street research. In a two-part survey of 20 McDonald’s operators released last month, Kalinowski Equity Research wrote that it asked franchisee contacts if they were in favor of the changes to national franchising standards. For context, McDonald’s said it has some 2,000 owner/operators in the U.S. franchise system.
“As it turns out, every single one of the franchisees who responded to this question said ‘No.’ This is the first time in the 20+ year history of our McDonald’s Franchisee Survey that all respondents to a Yes-or-No question have all provided the exact same answer,” Kalinowski wrote.
Advertisement
Kalinowski also had operators quantify their relationship with McDonald’s corporate arm on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The average response received was 1.37, a “pretty noticeable step down from the October 2025 average response of 1.71,” the survey said.
Still, McDonald’s stock was one of the better performers in an abysmal year for the restaurant sector in 2025, rising 5%.
Kalinowski’s respondents also rated their business outlook for the next six months on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5, excellent. The average response was 2.58, the best in the 11 quarters. Last quarter, CEO Chris Kempczinski said full-year cash flow was set to be solid for operators at the same time value investments were being made.
Advertisement
“Throughout the quarter, McDonald’s seems to be doing a better general job of promoting value to quick-service consumers, or at least it’s doing so notably better than some other large, quick-service burger concepts are,” Kalinowski wrote.
Likewise, fellow firm BTIG recently upgraded the stock.
“We expect the change in value strategy and perception to lead to the most meaningful earnings growth for the company since 2023,” BTIG wrote.
Former FAA safety team member Kyle Bailey joins ‘Fox & Friends’ to weigh in on a sudden shutdown of El Paso airspace due to security reasons.
The Federal Aviation Administration has grounded all flights to and from El Paso International Airport in Texas for the next 10 days, the agency announced Wednesday, warning that the U.S. government “may use deadly force” against an aircraft in violation, if it is deemed to pose “an imminent security threat.”
All flights to and from El Paso are grounded, including commercial, cargo and general aviation. The restriction is effective from February 10 at 11:30 p.m. MST to February 20 at 11:30 p.m. MST. The FAA cited “special security reasons” for the closure, but did not elaborate.
Advertisement
The no-fly restriction applies to airspace over El Paso as well as nearby Santa Teresa, New Mexico.
A person watches an Air Canada airplane being towed away from a gate at Terminal 1 at Pearson International Airport on February 6, 2024, in Toronto, Canada. (Gary Hershorn/Getty Images / Getty Images)
Former FAA safety team member Kyle Bailey told Fox News on Wednesday that a 10-day restriction like this is “unprecedented.” He also noted the airport’s proximity to the Fort Bliss Army post.
“It’s definitely something like a national security event, a high-level VIP,” Bailey speculated, “but the interesting thing is that on the Mexican side of the border there is no flight restriction.”
President Donald Trump speaks to journalists after signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images / Getty Images)
“I think it’s safe to say that it’s something very big, either from a national security standpoint or perhaps testing something — equipment or something going into the air around the vicinity of those bases,” he added.
FOX Business’ Bonny Chu contributed to this report.
Kraft Heinz in September 2025 announced plans to split into two separately traded companies, reversing its 2015 megamerger, which was orchestrated by billionaire investor Warren Buffett.
Kraft Heinz on Wednesday said that it is pausing work on its previously announced plans to split the company.
Advertisement
Shares of the company fell 6% in premarket trading.
CEO Steve Cahillane, who joined Kraft Heinz in January, said in a statement that many of the company’s issues are “fixable and within our control.”
“My number one priority is returning the business to profitable growth, which will require ensuring all resources are fully focused on the execution of our operating plan,” he said. “As a result, we believe it is prudent to pause work related to the separation and we will no longer incur related dis-synergies this year.”
Kraft Heinz also plans to invest $600 million to fuel a turnaround of its U.S. business. The company plans to spend the money on its marketing, sales, and research and development. The investment will also go towards “product superiority and select pricing,” according to Cahillane.
Advertisement
In September, the company announced plans to split, reversing much of the blockbuster $46 billion merger from a decade ago that created one of the biggest food companies in the world.
Warren Buffett, who helped mastermind the deal, said that he was disappointed in the decision. Berkshire Hathaway has since taken a formal step toward unwinding its 28% stake in Kraft Heinz.
In December, Kraft Heinz announced Cahillane’s hiring. He previously led Kellogg through its own breakup and then headed spinoff Kellanova until its sale to Mars.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
The Shinawatra family’s impact on Thai politics stands out as one of the most significant—and divisive—elements of the country’s 21st-century history, marked by a pattern of sweeping election victories repeatedly disrupted by judicial or military interventions.
However, the “Shin clan” political movement, which includes Thai Rak Thai, the People Power Party, and Pheu Thai, has faced a significant decline, now only third in the 2026 general election—its lowest standing since its formation. Once a dominant force with a track record of landslide victories, the movement is now struggling with diminished political influence and the emergence of formidable new competitors.
A timeline of the “Shinawatra Era” in Thai politics.
The Rise of Thaksin (1998–2006)
Thaksin Shinawatra, a telecommunications tycoon, disrupted the traditional political establishment with a platform of “pro-poor” policies known as Thaksinomics.
1998: Thaksin founds the Thai Rak Thai (TRT) party.
2001: TRT wins a landslide victory. Thaksin becomes Prime Minister, introducing universal healthcare and rural microcredit.
2005: Thaksin becomes the first PM in Thai history to serve a full term and win a consecutive absolute majority.
2006 (The Turning Point): Mass “Yellow Shirt” protests erupt over allegations of corruption and tax evasion regarding the sale of his company, Shin Corp.
September 2006: While Thaksin is at the UN in New York, the military ousts him in a coup.
Proxy Battles and the Red Shirts (2007–2010)
Despite Thaksin being in exile, his political machine remained dominant under new names.
2007: The People’s Power Party (PPP), a TRT successor, wins the election. Samak Sundaravej becomes PM.
2008: Courts remove Samak for accepting payment for a TV cooking show. His successor (and Thaksin’s brother-in-law) Somchai Wongsawat is also removed by the court shortly after.
2010: Pro-Thaksin “Red Shirt” protesters occupy central Bangkok. A military crackdown leads to over 90 deaths.
The Yingluck Era (2011–2014)
The family returned to direct power with Thaksin’s youngest sister, Yingluck, leading the new Pheu Thai Party.
2011: Yingluck Shinawatra becomes Thailand’s first female Prime Minister after another landslide win.
2013: Her government attempts to pass an amnesty bill that would allow Thaksin to return without jail time. This sparks massive “Blue Sky” protests.
May 2014: After months of deadlock, the Constitutional Court removes Yingluck for abuse of power. Days later, General Prayut Chan-o-cha leads a military coup.
The Paetongtarn Era (2023–2025)
After nearly a decade of military-aligned rule, the Shinawatras made a dramatic comeback in a shifted political landscape.
May 2023: Pheu Thai loses to the Move Forward Party (MFP) in the general election but eventually forms a coalition with former rivals (pro-military parties) to secure the premiership.
August 2023:Thaksin Shinawatra returns to Thailand after 15 years in exile. He is sentenced to prison but immediately moved to a hospital and later paroled.
August 2024: Following the court-ordered removal of PM Srettha Thavisin, Paetongtarn “Ung Ing” Shinawatra (Thaksin’s daughter) is elected Prime Minister.
Summary of Shinawatra Prime Ministers
Name
Relation
Term
Reason for Leaving
Thaksin Shinawatra
Patriarch
2001–2006
Military Coup
Somchai Wongsawat
Brother-in-law
2008
Court Order
Yingluck Shinawatra
Sister
2011–2014
Court Order / Military Coup
Paetongtarn Shinawatra
Daughter
2024–2025
Court Order
The 2026 Election: A Historic Low
Campaign and Outcome:
Pheu Thai, seeking to restore its popularity, fielded “Dr Shane” Yodchanan Wongsawat (a Shinawatra family member) as its prime ministerial candidate, campaigning with the slogan “Overhaul Thailand—Pheu Thai can do it.”
Unofficial results from the February 8, 2026, election indicate Pheu Thai has fallen to third place, signaling it is no longer the dominant party capable of forming a government.
Key Factors Contributing to the Decline:
Rise of New Parties: The emergence of new progressive parties, such as the People’s Party, with liberal branding and strong appeal to new voters, directly challenged Pheu Thai’s base.
Strong Rivals: Bhumjaithai has established a solid voter base and local political power-brokers, positioning it to form a second-term government.
Loss of Strongholds: A major upset occurred in Chiang Mai, a long-standing Shinawatra stronghold, where Pheu Thai failed to win a single seat. The People’s Party swept six constituencies, while Kla Tham secured four in remote areas, demonstrating a significant shift in voter allegiances across urban and rural/border regions.
Political Instability: The repeated removal of prime ministers through legal and ethical challenges further damaged the party’s image and stability.
Pheu Thai must reflect on these successive electoral defeats, as the “Shinawatra clan” experiences a decline in political influence, while opposing parties strengthen and gain momentum. This shift in the political landscape signals a need for Pheu Thai to reassess its strategies, rebuild its grassroots support, and adapt to the changing demands of the electorate. Failure to address these challenges could further erode its standing, allowing rival parties to consolidate their power and reshape the nation’s political dynamics.
Paramount Skydance has boosted its bid for Warner Bros Discovery by offering shareholders extra cash if the deal drags beyond 2026 and agreeing to cover Netflix’s breakup fee if Warner Bros walks away.
The move is the latest in Paramount’s ongoing battle with Netflix for the Hollywood studio’s prized film and TV assets.
The new incentives include a 25-cent-per-share “ticking fee,” worth about $650 million per quarter from early 2027 until the deal closes.
According to CNA, Paramount has not increased its $30-per-share offer, totaling $108.4 billion including debt, but pledged to fund the $2.8 billion termination fee Warner Bros would owe Netflix if their $82.7 billion merger collapses.
Advertisement
Both Netflix and Paramount covet Warner Bros for its blockbuster franchises, including “Game of Thrones,” “Harry Potter,” and DC Comics superheroes like Batman and Superman.
Paramount, which owns CBS, would also acquire Warner Bros’ television networks, including CNN and TNT, which are expected to spin off into a separately traded company, Discovery Global.
Paramount CEO David Ellison said, “We are making meaningful enhancements – backing this offer with billions of dollars, providing shareholders with certainty in value, a clear regulatory path, and protection against market volatility.”
The company has also raised Ellison’s personal guarantee to $43.3 billion and secured $54 billion in debt financing from Bank of America, Citigroup, and Apollo.
Advertisement
Paramount’s Desperate Warner Bros Bid $650M Quarterly “Bribes” to Kill the Deal?
Paramount is throwing everything to block Warner Bros from merging with them. They now promise $650 million every quarter to WB shareholders if the deal doesn’t close by end of 2026.
Despite the sweetened offer, analysts say Paramount may struggle to win over Warner Bros shareholders.
Advertisement
Ross Benes, senior analyst at Emarketer, called the move “throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping something sticks,” noting that Paramount’s best chance may come from regulatory hurdles blocking Netflix.
Activist investor Ancora Holdings, which owns roughly $200 million in Warner Bros shares, has expressed opposition to the Netflix deal and could push for Paramount if the board fails to secure a better offer, Reutersreported.
Warner Bros said its board will review the updated offer but maintains support for Netflix’s merger.
Paramount has also addressed other concerns by offering to backstop Warner Bros’ planned debt exchange and certifying compliance with US antitrust regulators.
Advertisement
It is in talks with regulators in the US, EU, and UK and has secured foreign investment approval in Germany.
Netflix’s $82.7 billion all-cash offer remains in place. Gaining Warner Bros’ assets could give Netflix cultural and streaming power, with nearly half a billion subscribers worldwide. A Warner Bros shareholder vote on the Netflix deal is expected by April.