The Asian M&A landscape in 2025 painted a picture of cautious optimism layered over deep structural challenges. While regional deal values rose 10% and volumes increased a modest 3%, these aggregate figures mask a market experiencing profound fragmentation.
The forces reshaping global dealmaking, artificial intelligence chief among them, are hitting Asia with particular intensity, exposing gaps in capital access, technological readiness, and strategic conviction across the region’s diverse economies.
Asia’s M&A recovery tells multiple stories simultaneously. China, after years of subdued activity, saw deal volumes surge 22% in 2025, though levels remain well below the 2021 peak. India, Japan, and South Korea all posted double-digit growth in deal values, signaling pockets of robust activity. Yet most other Asia Pacific markets reported year-over-year declines in deal volumes, revealing a region where momentum concentrates in select markets while others struggle to gain traction.
This uneven performance reflects more than cyclical variation. It signals Asia’s positioning in a global M&A market increasingly defined by a K-shaped recovery, where scale, capital depth, and AI readiness separate winners from the rest.
The Capital Allocation Dilemma Hitting Asia Hard
Asian corporations face an acute version of the capital allocation challenge confronting dealmakers worldwide. External estimates suggest that between $5 trillion and $8 trillion will flow toward AI technologies and enabling infrastructure globally over the next five years. For context, global M&A activity totaled just $3.5 trillion in 2025. This multitrillion-dollar AI investment supercycle is forcing Asian companies to make stark choices between building AI capabilities and pursuing traditional growth-through-acquisition strategies.
The tension manifests differently across the region. Chinese technology companies, already investing heavily in AI development, find themselves navigating both technological transformation and geopolitical constraints that complicate cross-border dealmaking. Japanese conglomerates, sitting on substantial cash reserves, are weighing AI infrastructure investments against long-planned international acquisitions. Indian technology services firms are racing to acquire AI capabilities while defending market share against AI-enabled automation.
The immediate impact is visible in near-term M&A activity. Capital that might have funded acquisitions is instead flowing into data centers, semiconductor capacity, cloud infrastructure, and AI model development. This reallocation helps explain why Asia’s deal volume growth lags value growth, and why mid-market activity remains particularly subdued.
Geographic Confidence Gaps Shape Deal Activity
Perhaps no metric better illustrates Asia’s M&A fragmentation than CEO confidence levels. According to PwC’s Global CEO Survey, approximately 50% of Indian CEOs plan major acquisitions within the next three years, matching optimism levels in the United States. Yet only around 20% of Chinese CEOs express similar intent, placing China among the most cautious major markets globally alongside Germany.
This confidence gap translates directly into dealmaking patterns. India’s M&A market benefits from strong domestic growth expectations, a robust technology sector, and increasing interest from both strategic acquirers and financial sponsors. The country’s position as a beneficiary of supply chain diversification and nearshoring trends further supports deal activity.
China’s more muted M&A sentiment reflects multiple headwinds: regulatory uncertainty, property sector challenges, geopolitical tensions affecting outbound investment, and questions about the sustainability of growth rates. While the 22% increase in deal volumes suggests improving conditions, Chinese companies remain more focused on domestic consolidation and strategic repositioning than aggressive expansion.
Japan occupies middle ground, with deal activity driven by demographic pressures, succession planning for family-owned businesses, and large corporations pursuing portfolio rationalization. South Korea’s double-digit value growth reflects both technology sector strength and industrial consolidation, particularly in sectors adjacent to semiconductors and advanced manufacturing.
AI’s Impact: From Manufacturing to Healthcare
Asia’s manufacturing-heavy economy means AI’s impact on M&A extends beyond pure technology deals. PwC’s analysis of the 100 largest global M&A transactions in 2025 found that approximately one-third cited AI as part of their strategic rationale, with technology, manufacturing, and power and utilities sectors showing the highest AI references.
For Asian companies, this creates both pressure and opportunity. Traditional manufacturing firms are pursuing acquisitions to embed AI across operations, supply chains, and product development. Healthcare companies are acquiring data analytics and software capabilities to accelerate drug development and personalized medicine. Industrial conglomerates are buying robotics and automation assets to integrate AI-driven efficiency gains.
SoftBank’s proposed $5.4 billion acquisition of ABB’s robotics business exemplifies Asia’s strategic approach, positioning a major Japanese technology investor at the intersection of AI and industrial automation. The deal signals recognition that AI’s value emerges not from algorithms alone but from their integration into physical systems and real-world operations.
Chinese pharmaceutical companies are also active, with innovation in drug development driving strategic transactions despite broader market caution. These deals reflect China’s strategic priority on technological self-sufficiency and its determination to build domestic capabilities in sectors deemed critical for future competitiveness.
The Scale Disadvantage in a Megadeal World
Asia confronts a structural challenge in the current M&A environment: relative underrepresentation in megadeals. While the region generated solid mid-market activity, it captured a smaller share of transactions exceeding $5 billion compared to the Americas, which dominated megadeal activity in 2025.
This matters because megadeals drove the entire recovery in global M&A values. Roughly 600 transactions above $1 billion accounted for the 36% increase in global deal values, while the remaining 47,000 transactions were flat year-over-year. Asian companies and markets participating less actively in this megadeal wave risk being left behind as competitive dynamics increasingly favor scale.
Several factors explain Asia’s megadeal deficit. First, regulatory scrutiny of large transactions has intensified across multiple jurisdictions, particularly for deals touching sensitive technologies or critical infrastructure. Second, cross-border megadeals face heightened geopolitical risk, encouraging companies to pursue domestic or regional transactions rather than transformative global consolidation. Third, valuation gaps between Asian targets and global acquirers remain wide, complicating negotiations for the largest deals.
The exception proves the rule: where Asian companies do pursue megadeals, they increasingly focus on acquiring capabilities essential for AI competitiveness, particularly in semiconductors, data infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing.
Other People are Reading
