Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

A new bipartisan bill wants to ensure the next century of tech is written in America

Published

on

A new bipartisan bill wants to ensure the next century of tech is written in America

On Thursday, Congress took a small but significant step toward ensuring America remains the best place in the world to build. Bipartisan legislation – the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 – would protect software developers from being swept up under criminal code Section 1960, a statute designed for money laundering, not innovation. For builders working in good faith on open-source software, that legal gray zone has cast a chill on American competitiveness.

It is one bill. But the principle it embodies reaches further than any single piece of legislation – and it arrives at a pivotal moment.

As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary this July, it is tempting to look backward to commemorate milestones and celebrate triumphs. But America’s most consequential moments have rarely come from preservation alone. They have come from renewal: building new systems that allowed the country to adapt to a changing world.

Every American century has been defined not just by ideals, but by infrastructure. Canals and railroads powered industrial expansion. Telecommunications connected a continental economy. The internet reshaped commerce, culture and capital markets. Each era rewarded those willing to build.

Advertisement

Today, the next layer of infrastructure is taking shape in code.

Software developers are the architects of modern economic systems. They shape how money moves, how markets function and how people coordinate on a global scale. Unlike the builders of past eras, many are globally distributed and highly mobile – choosing where to work and innovate based on clarity, opportunity and regulatory environment. Open-source development allows anyone, anywhere, to contribute foundational code. That work has produced billions of lines of software that are collectively maintained and power modern commerce and coordination.

At the same time, the nature of financial infrastructure itself is evolving. Where previous generations built physical rails, today’s builders are creating digital rails – protocols that move value, establish trust and operate at internet speed. These layers increasingly underpin payments, financial services, identity and ownership.

One illustration of this transformation is the growth of the developer ecosystem building on Solana. According to the most recent Electric Capital Developer Report, Solana was the leading ecosystem for new developers in 2024, growing 84% year over year. The Solana ecosystem shows how fast, low-cost, open infrastructure attracts and retains talent willing to invest in solving real problems – from payments and decentralized finance to identity and decentralized applications at scale.

Advertisement

This is not about hype or token prices. It’s about where infrastructure gets deployed, and whether the builders of tomorrow, who write the code that defines digital markets, feel a country welcomes innovation or obstructs it.

Globally, governments are recognizing this reality. Several jurisdictions have moved forward with clear frameworks for digital assets and blockchain-based systems, providing developers and entrepreneurs with predictability. This sends a signal: building is welcome here.

In the United States, there are encouraging signs of progress beyond Thursday’s bill. Under the leadership of SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, the Commission is shifting from a posture defined primarily by enforcement toward one focused on engagement, clarity and constructive rulemaking.

Developers and market participants do not expect the absence of regulation – they expect rules that are understandable, durable and aligned with how modern technology actually functions. Recent efforts to engage industry, solicit public input and distinguish bad actors from good-faith builders are an important step toward restoring confidence that the United States intends to lead, not lag, in the development of digital financial infrastructure.

Advertisement

We have seen this dynamic before. The early days of railroads, aviation and the internet were marked by experimentation and ambiguity. Regulation followed innovation, not the other way around. That sequence was not a flaw; it was a feature of leadership. It allowed the United States to set global standards rather than inherit them.

As we look toward America’s next 250 years, the same principle applies. Protecting the freedom to build – especially in open, general-purpose technologies – is a core American value. Writing code, absent intent to harm, is a form of expression and exploration. A nation founded on free speech and enterprise should be cautious about criminalizing innovation simply because it is new.

This moment is also an opportunity to renew American leadership in capital markets. Blockchain-based systems enable faster settlement, broader participation and more resilient market infrastructure – an evolution some have termed “internet capital markets.” These ideas are not about overnight disruption, but about upgrading the rails beneath existing institutions so they remain globally competitive.

The question before us is not whether these technologies will shape the global economy. They already are. The question is whether the United States will lead its development – or watch as talent, standards, and capital consolidate elsewhere.

Advertisement

America’s founders did not assume their experiment would succeed forever. They designed it so future generations could improve it. As we celebrate our nation’s 250th year, we face a similar responsibility: not to preserve the past unchanged, but to ensure that future builders still see America as the best place in the world to build.

The next American century will be written in code. The choice we make now determines where that code gets written.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Gold slides below $4.5k, crypto is bleeding, and “store of value” myths are cracking

Published

on

Bitcoin-gold ratio flashes historic warning as altcoins sink to record lows

Gold has slipped from above $5,200 while crypto bleeds and silver dumps, exposing “store of value” as a question of volatility, leverage and time horizon, not memes.

Summary

  • Gold has dropped about 10–15% from its early‑March spike above $5,200 to around $4,560, but remains structurally elevated and keeps finding dip buyers near the mid‑$4,500s.
  • Silver has been hit harder, sliding roughly 20% this month back toward the low‑$70s per ounce, underscoring its role as the high‑beta “altcoin” of the metals complex.
  • Crypto is mirroring the direction with more violence: BTC stuck in the high‑$60,000s to low‑$70,000s, total market cap around $2.4 trillion, and Bitcoin dominance near 58% as capital hides in the least ugly risk asset.

Spot gold is trading just below $4,600 today, down roughly 10–15% from its early‑March blow‑off above $5,200, but still structurally elevated versus last year’s range. The parabolic spike has unwound, yet the metal holds a firm bid as a macro hedge, with buyers repeatedly stepping in on dips toward the mid‑$4,500s rather than capitulating en masse. Silver, by contrast, has been punished harder: spot sits around the low‑$70s per ounce after a ~20% month‑to‑date drawdown, with futures pointing to further downside if resistance near $74 holds.

Crypto is mirroring the metals’ directionality but with far more violence. Bitcoin trades around the high‑$60,000s to low‑$70,000s, off more than 4% in the last 24 hours and roughly $17,000 below its level a year ago, as leverage gets flushed out of the system. Total crypto market cap sits in the $2.4–$2.5 trillion band, with BTC dominance above 58%, underscoring how capital is crowding back into the most “respectable” corner of the asset class as altcoins underperform. The tape is classic deleveraging: failed intraday bounces, narrowing leadership, and a persistent bid for liquidity over narrative.

Advertisement

Set against that backdrop, the gold‑versus‑Bitcoin (BTC) framing looks less like a clean binary and more like a duration trade on macro stress. Gold below $4,600 is still signaling strong, but no longer panicked, demand for hard collateral from institutions that care about collateral rehypothecation, margin frameworks, and Basel treatment. Bitcoin around $70,000 is functioning as a high‑beta macro asset: sensitive to rates, dollar strength, and ETF flows, with predictions and technicals flagging risk of a deeper slide toward the mid‑$50,000s if support breaks. Silver, meanwhile, behaves like the altcoin of the metals complex—levered to growth and speculation, attractive on upside days, brutal when liquidity tightens.

For allocators, the positioning logic is blunt. In this regime, gold is the low‑volatility ballast: trim the chase from the $5,000 area, but keep core exposure as long as real yields and geopolitical noise stay elevated. Bitcoin is the liquid convexity leg within crypto, but it is not trading like a safe haven; sizing needs to reflect equity‑like drawdown risk, not ETF‑brochure marketing. Silver and high‑beta altcoins both belong in the same bucket: small notional, strict risk, used for targeted upside rather than any pretense of wealth preservation.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Early CLARITY Act Deal Reached Between White House and US Lawmakers: Report

Published

on

US Government, United States

Rumors are circulating that a tentative deal has been struck between the White House and US lawmakers on stablecoin yield, potentially moving the CLARITY crypto market structure bill forward.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks, both members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, have reached an “agreement in principle,” according to a Friday Politico report.

“I think what it will do is to allow us to protect innovation, but also gives us the opportunity to prevent widespread deposit flight,” Alsobrooks said, adding that the deal prohibits stablecoin yield on “passive balances.”

US Government, United States
The CLARITY Act. Source: US Congress

Specific details of the prospective deal have yet to emerge, and Senator Tillis said the crypto industry must vet the agreement before it is finalized. 

Cointelegraph reached out to the White House for details on the prospective deal but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

Advertisement

Speaking at the DC Blockchain Summit on Wednesday, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the biggest advocates for digital asset policy on the Hill, said, “We are so close” to passing a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework.

A spokesperson for Senator Lummis told Cointelegraph on Wednesday that a deal is expected to materialize in “the next few days,” and that Senator Lummis is working to hammer out ethics language in the bill.

US Government, United States
Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis addresses the DC Blockchain Summit. Source: DC Blockchain Summit

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, otherwise known as the CLARITY Act, is a major piece of crypto legislation and was widely anticipated to pass without issue after the GENIUS stablecoin framework was signed into law.

However, the bill stalled in January after major industry players, including crypto exchange Coinbase, voiced concerns, including whether stablecoin issuers could share yield with token holders

Related: CLARITY Act risks handing crypto to centralized players: Gnosis exec

Advertisement

Banks are fearful that the bill will erode market share and cause deposit flight

The banking industry opposes yield-bearing stablecoins, citing concerns over the flight of bank deposits, which have yields far below 1%, and the erosion of banking market share.

Patrick Witt, the executive director of the White House Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said that these concerns are overblown.

A wave of fresh capital will likely enter the US banking industry if dollar-pegged yield-bearing stablecoins are legalized and regulated, Witt said.

Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in the stablecoin fight

Advertisement