Crypto World
After Crashes, Hacks, and FTX, a Veteran Investor Says This Is the Real Bitcoin Danger
A veteran bull said that the Bitcoin Core team is “fighting the last war.”
The blockchain’s quantum conundrum is intensifying, raising fresh concerns about whether Bitcoin can survive the long-term threat posed by quantum computing.
A veteran bull has warned that it poses Bitcoin’s first truly existential risk, but is being ignored.
“Fighting the Last War”
Charles Edwards, founder of Capriole Investments, said he is more concerned about Bitcoin’s future today than at any point across multiple market cycles, while citing the growing threat posed by quantum computing.
In a post on X, Edwards explained that he had previously remained confident through extreme price crashes, exchange shutdowns, hacks, and major frauds such as the collapse of FTX. He said those events never undermined his long-term outlook on Bitcoin.
However, the current risk is different in nature, according to Edwards, who warned that Bitcoin’s existing cryptographic defenses are not adequate to withstand advances in quantum technology. He compared the situation to outdated military strategies being deployed against modern warfare, and stated that Bitcoin “does not stand a chance” without adaptation.
The investor also added that the most troubling aspect is not only the severity of the quantum threat itself, but what he described as the dismissal and lack of urgency surrounding the issue.
CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju had also voiced concerns about the growing quantum computing threat facing Bitcoin. He said that protecting the network may require difficult decisions. One potential solution, according to Ju, could be freezing older Bitcoin addresses as part of a quantum-resistant upgrade.
You may also like:
He added that implementing such changes would be challenging, as the crypto community has often struggled to agree on protocol updates. Ju even went on to add that assets considered secure today may not remain safe if quantum technology continues to advance.
Industry Remains Divided
Not everyone in the crypto industry agrees on how urgent the threat to the world’s largest cryptocurrency really is. In December, Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, said quantum computers do not pose a near-term risk to Bitcoin. He believes the technology remains far from being able to break Bitcoin’s cryptography. Lopp acknowledged that researchers should continue monitoring progress in the field, but said fears of an imminent threat are premature. He also noted that preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum future would be a long process.
Similar views have been expressed by Grayscale, which said in a recent report that quantum computing is unlikely to have a meaningful impact on crypto markets in 2026. While acknowledging long-term risks, the firm downplayed short-term consequences.
More recently, Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor also minimized the concern. Speaking on Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell, Saylor said most cybersecurity experts believe any credible quantum threat remains more than a decade away.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
TLDR:
- Ondo Finance deploys OUSG on the XRP Ledger, targeting institutional capital with a $5,000 minimum investment threshold.
- USDY on Stellar offers Treasury-backed yield to users in emerging markets where currency instability remains a persistent challenge.
- Ripple’s institutional stack pairs RLUSD, Hidden Road, and Metaco custody with Ondo’s tokenized Treasury products for enterprise use.
- Ondo Finance bridges the asset and payments sides of finance by supplying Treasury instruments across two structurally distinct networks.
Ondo Finance is expanding its real-world asset tokenization strategy beyond major Web3 chains. The protocol has deployed products on both the XRP Ledger and the Stellar network.
Each integration is designed to serve a distinct financial audience with a specific product offering. OUSG targets institutional capital on the XRP Ledger, while USDY addresses a broader user base on Stellar. This dual structure places Ondo Finance at the center of a growing tokenized Treasury market.
Ondo Finance and Ripple Target Institutional Capital Through Compliant Infrastructure
OUSG is a tokenized representation of short-term U.S. Treasuries. It carries a minimum investment threshold of $5,000. This structure is not built for retail DeFi participation. Instead, it targets institutional capital looking for compliant, dollar-denominated yield.
Web3Alert on X pointed out that Ondo Finance has paired OUSG with RLUSD on the XRP Ledger. RLUSD is widely recognized as one of the most regulated stablecoins available.
Together, OUSG and RLUSD create a pathway for institutional assets to settle across enterprise-grade rails. The XRP Ledger provides near-instant settlement suited to high-value transactions.
Ripple’s broader ecosystem adds further institutional depth to this arrangement. Metaco and Standard Custody serve as institutional custody solutions within the stack.
Hidden Road brings prime brokerage capability, while GTreasury integrations support treasury operations. These tools allow tokenized collateral to work across real-world financial workflows.
Ondo Finance functions as the asset origination layer within this framework. It provides the Treasury instruments that the XRP Ledger infrastructure settles and manages.
The combined model targets banks, asset managers, and corporate treasury teams. Regulated assets on regulated rails form the backbone of this institutional design.
Stellar Integration Extends Yield-Bearing Access to Emerging Markets
USDY is structurally different from OUSG in one important way. It accrues Treasury-backed returns while also functioning as a stable payment asset.
This makes USDY accessible to a much wider audience than institutional-grade products. Stellar’s network, built around financial inclusion and remittance corridors, is a natural fit.
Web3Alert observed that in regions facing currency instability or limited banking access, a 4–5% Treasury-backed yield addresses a real need. It helps individuals preserve the value of their money over time.
Traditional remittance platforms in developing economies do not offer this kind of return. A yield-bearing dollar provides measurably more utility than a static one.
Stellar’s infrastructure has long supported cross-border payments and financial access in underserved communities. USDY on Stellar merges the asset side and the payments side of finance into a single instrument.
Users in emerging markets can hold, send, and earn yield at the same time. This level of functionality has not been widely available through conventional financial services.
Ondo Finance sits between both institutional and retail ecosystems. It supplies the Treasury products that power each of these networks.
Ripple drives institutional RWA settlement infrastructure, while Stellar enables accessible, yield-bearing payments. Rather than competing, the two networks are building distinct verticals within the broader RWA economy.
Crypto asset manager Bitwise has acquired the staking services company Chorus One, which oversees more than $2.2 billion in staked assets and could help Bitwise expand its portfolio of crypto staking products.
Bitwise said on Tuesday that 50 of Chorus One’s employees will join Bitwise Onchain Solutions, where several billion dollars’ worth of crypto assets are already staked.
The acquisition could see Bitwise diversify its range of exchange-traded products, including staking, as the Securities and Exchange Commission has shown support for a broader range of crypto investment products.
Staking allows holders of crypto tokens to earn rewards, typically between 2% and 10% a year, by locking the tokens on a blockchain, providing investors with additional yield on top of potential appreciation of the underlying token.
The size of the acquisition deal was not shared. Bitwise did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley said staking remains “one of the most compelling growth opportunities” for its thousands of clients holding spot crypto assets.
Deal expands Bitwise staking to more chains
The Chorus One deal expands Bitwise’s staking capabilities on more than 30 proof-of-stake chains, including Solana, Hyperliquid, Monad, Avalanche, Sui, Aptos and Tezos.
Related: Bitcoin ETF sell-off is ‘purification’ of bull case, investor says
Chorus One has provided crypto staking infrastructure services since 2018 for finance firms, family offices, high-net-worth individuals, custodians, funds, exchanges and decentralized protocols.
Bitwise said the Chorus One team would join Bitwise, including Chorus One CEO Brian Crain, who will take on an advisory role.
Bitwise now has nearly 200 employees worldwide managing crypto exchange-traded products for its thousands of clients.
As of February, Bitwise has over $15 billion in assets under management across more than 40 investment products.
Its flagship products are the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and the Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW), which have accumulated over $2 billion and $387 million worth of flows since launching in January and July of 2024, respectively.
Its other products include the Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL), Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP), the Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK) and the Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW).
Magazine: DAT panic dumps 73,000 ETH, India’s crypto tax stays: Asia Express
Jane Street has returned to the spotlight after Terraform Labs’ bankruptcy estate accused the trading firm of insider trading tied to the May 2022 collapse of TerraUSD (UST) and LUNA.
The lawsuit alleges Jane Street used non-public information about Terraform’s liquidity withdrawals to exit positions and profit before the stablecoin lost its dollar peg.
Terraform Lawsuit Puts Jane Street Back Under Scrutiny
According to the complaint, Terraform quietly removed about $150 million of liquidity from Curve pools that supported UST. Shortly afterward, wallets linked to Jane Street allegedly withdrew or sold tens of millions of dollars worth of UST.
Terraform claims these actions accelerated the loss of confidence that triggered a broader collapse, wiping out about $40 billion in value.
However, these remain allegations. Jane Street has denied wrongdoing and said it will defend itself in court. No court has yet ruled on the claims.
A pattern of Indirect Links to Major Crypto Failures
Jane Street’s name has also surfaced repeatedly in connection with other major crypto collapses, including FTX. However, the firm has not been accused of wrongdoing in the FTX case.
Instead, the connection comes through people. Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX and Alameda Research, previously worked as a trader at Jane Street. Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison also began her career at the firm.
These links reflect Jane Street’s role as a major training ground for quantitative traders. However, there is no verified evidence that Jane Street, as a company, played any role in FTX’s fraud or collapse.
Investigators have attributed the collapse to internal misuse of customer funds by FTX and Alameda leadership.
Jane Street’s Role as a Market Maker in Crypto
Jane Street operates as a global quantitative trading firm and liquidity provider. It uses algorithms and statistical models to trade stocks, bonds, ETFs, and increasingly, cryptocurrencies.
The firm does not run crypto exchanges or issue tokens. Instead, it acts as a market maker.
Market makers provide liquidity by continuously buying and selling assets, helping markets function smoothly.
Because of this role, Jane Street interacts with many crypto companies as a trading counterparty. This exposure often places it close to major market events, including collapses.
Jane Street became one of the largest crypto market makers during the industry’s rapid growth between 2020 and 2022. It traded on major exchanges and provided liquidity across multiple crypto assets.
This scale means its trading activity often appears in blockchain records and liquidity pools. However, visibility does not imply causation.
Regulators and courts have not found Jane Street liable for causing any major crypto collapse. The Terraform lawsuit marks the first major legal claim directly accusing the firm of wrongdoing related to a crypto failure.
Legal outcome could shape future scrutiny
The Terraform case may clarify whether Jane Street’s trading activity crossed legal boundaries or reflected standard market-making behavior.
The outcome could also shape how courts interpret insider information in decentralized markets.
For now, Jane Street remains a powerful but largely behind-the-scenes player in crypto. Its influence reflects its scale, technical expertise, and role in providing liquidity — even as questions about its involvement continue to emerge.
- Terraform lawsuit vs Jane Street puts Terra Classic (LUNC) in focus.
- Terra Classic (LUNC) shows technical resilience, eyeing $0.00003925 short-term.
- 2026 price range is expected to be between $0.0000242 and $0.000510.
The price of Terra Classic (LUNC) has been under the spotlight as legal tensions surrounding its parent company, Terraform Labs, continue to unfold.
Investors are watching closely after news emerged that the administrator overseeing the wind-down of Terraform Labs has sued trading firm Jane Street.
The lawsuit alleges the trading firm used non-public information from Terraform insiders to profit ahead of the collapse of TerraUSD in May 2022.
This legal move adds a new layer of uncertainty for LUNC holders.
Many remember that the original Terra blockchain was rebranded as Terra Classic after the collapse, while a new Terra 2.0 network was launched.
LUNC now trades at around $0.00003509, down roughly 46% over the past year, with a circulating supply of approximately 5.47 trillion coins.
Jane Street charges
The lawsuit centres on allegations that Jane Street gained access to confidential data through back channels.
This allegedly allowed the firm to strategically withdraw significant amounts of UST from liquidity pools just minutes after Terraform executed internal moves.
The complaint claims these trades contributed to the broader collapse of the stablecoin and accelerated losses for Terraform’s creditors.
Jane Street has denied the allegations, calling the claims baseless and emphasising that the market turmoil was driven by internal mismanagement within Terraform.
Legal observers note that the case could have implications not only for the firms involved but also for market perception around LUNC and other related assets.
LUNC price analysis
Despite its turbulent history, LUNC has shown some resilience.
The coin has been trading in a range of $0.0000343 to $0.00003516 over the past 24 hours, reflecting a small degree of stability.
Analysts like For-Exx Kripto note that the coin has remained inside a flag formation, though the pattern recently experienced a slight break.
This break could have signalled a sharp decline, yet LUNC did not fall dramatically.
This can be interpreted as a bullish signal in the short term, suggesting that a price attempt toward $0.00003925 could be on the horizon.
While the coin remains far from its historical highs, such technical patterns provide hints about potential upward momentum despite broader market challenges.
Trading volume has also been modest, with about $8.9 million changing hands in the last 24 hours.
Terra Classic price prediction
Looking ahead, analysts project that LUNC could trade within a wide range in 2026.
The minimum expected level is around $0.0000242, while the maximum target could reach $0.000510 by the end of the year.
Key levels to watch include support near the $0.000024 mark, which may act as a floor in case of market weakness.
Resistance lies around $0.000510, representing a potential upside target for traders seeking gains.
Short-term moves toward $0.00003925 could also provide intermediate targets, especially if the market reacts positively to technical signals or news from ongoing legal developments.
Meta has issued a request for proposals (RFP) to third-party firms for stablecoin-based payments, potentially marking a comeback in the stablecoin market with Stripe as a possible partner.
Meta is planning to deploy a stablecoin this year after issuing a request for proposals (RFP) to third-party companies, CoinDesk reported on Tuesday, Feb. 24.
CoinDesk also noted that a potential partnership with payments giant Stripe could be in the works, though no official confirmation has been made. A potential collaboration with Stripe would leverage the payment company’s expertise and existing infrastructure in the stablecoin domain.
The development comes as the company seeks to re-enter the stablecoin market following the collapse of its previous Libra/Diem project due to regulatory pressures. The stablecoin sector currently boasts a market capitalization of over $308 billion, up from $206 billion in January 2025, according to DeFiLlama.
Meta initially launched its Libra stablecoin in 2019, later rebranded to Diem, but the project was shuttered amid intense regulatory scrutiny. This setback underscored the challenges that large tech companies face in navigating the complex landscape of financial regulations.
This article was generated with the assistance of AI workflows.
Despite dumping its treasury, Bitdeer boosted self-mining above 63 EH/s and significantly increased year-over-year Bitcoin production amid market pressure.
In a bid to calm investor nerves after confirming that it has sold all of its Bitcoin holdings, Bitdeer Technologies framed the move as a deliberate liquidity decision rather than a bearish signal on the asset itself.
In a recent statement, the Singapore-based miner stated that converting newly mined Bitcoin into cash is a pragmatic step as it evaluates several non-binding opportunities to acquire powered land, a process that requires capital readiness well before deals are finalized.
Zero-BTC Balance Sheet
Despite the sale, Bitdeer continues to scale aggressively on the operational front. It ramped up self-mining capacity to more than 63 EH/s and sharply increased Bitcoin production year over year, even as it sold the entirety of its recent output rather than retaining it on the balance sheet. Its official announcement on X read,
“Our decision to sell Bitcoin should not be a concern for the broader market. Our hash rate will continue to grow, and we will continue to mine more Bitcoin for the interest of our shareholders.”
The latest move represents a significant departure from the balance-sheet accumulation strategy popularized by firms such as Strategy, which has treated Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset.
At the same time, the firm is accelerating a strategic pivot that further explains its cash needs – expansion into AI and high-performance computing infrastructure. Deploying large-scale GPU systems and converting existing mining sites in the US and Europe into AI-ready data centers demands substantially more upfront capital than incremental mining buildouts, which makes the sale more rational.
Breaking From Miner Playbook
Bitdeer isn’t the only player to have offloaded its BTC stash. In fact, there has been an emerging pattern among public miners such as Riot Platforms, Bitfarms, and Core Scientific, many of which have partially sold mined Bitcoin or diversified into AI to stabilize cash flows.
Even so, Bitdeer’s decision to completely exit Bitcoin holdings places it outside the norm for publicly traded miners. Most of its peers still maintain sizable treasuries. For instance, MARA Holdings holds more than 53,000 BTC, while Riot Platforms retains close to 18,000 BTC.
You may also like:
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Ether has faced renewed selling pressure, with traders watching a price drift toward a critical support zone as bearish sentiment deepens. A roughly 14% slide over the past 10 days culminated in a notable surge in leveraged liquidations, underscoring the fragility of near-term demand for the network’s data-processing capabilities. The latest move comes as broader market dynamics remain tethered to Bitcoin, with cyclical risk-off trades and hedging activity intensifying as on-chain activity cools and institutional flows remain unsettled.
Key takeaways
- ETH futures liquidations reached $224 million after a 14% price drop over 10 days, coinciding with a broad pullback in on-chain activity and a precarious bias in the options market.
- Derivatives data show a sharp shift toward downside hedging, with the ETH put-to-call volume premium spiking to 2.2x and the 30-day delta skew at 18%, signaling elevated demand for protection against further declines.
- Ethereum’s network fundamentals deteriorated, with total value locked (TVL) dipping to $51 billion—the lowest level since May 2025—and 30-day network fees sliding to $13.7 million, indicating waning activity on the chain.
- Valuable anchor events added pressure, including a reported $7 million in ETH sales tied to donations associated with Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, contributing to a cautious mood around the asset.
- US-listed Ether ETFs recorded outsized outflows, totaling about $405 million since Feb. 11, driving assets under management down to roughly $12.4 billion and signaling continued institutional repositioning.
- The price path remains tightly correlated with Bitcoin, as Ether’s and BTC’s 20-day correlation held in the upper echelons, reinforcing the perception that macro flows dominate near-term moves.
The latest price action saw Ether fall toward the $1,800 level, erasing a substantial portion of gains from late last year and prompting traders to reassess risk exposure. The pullback has not only tested support but also exposed the fragility of the current floor, particularly as options markets show a renewed appetite for hedges rather than directional bets. The sentiment is not just about a single order book imbalance; it reflects a combination of thinner on-chain activity, lower disposable fees, and a sense that investors are waiting for clearer catalysts before re-engaging with sustained long exposure.
On the derivatives front, the market’s mood shifted abruptly on Tuesday. The put-to-call volume premium in ETH options rose to 2.2 times, a visible tilt toward downside protection as market participants positioned for increased volatility. The delta skew—an indicator of the relative pricing of puts versus calls—stood at about 18% on that day, underscoring that hedging costs were skewed toward protection rather than speculative bets on immediate rebounds. In practice, this configuration implies a market bracing for further price disruption, even as some traders may still tilt toward selling puts to attempt a bounce, a strategy that often backfires in persistent drawdowns.
The chain’s fundamental metrics corroborate a darker near-term outlook. Ethereum’s total value locked declined to around $51 billion, marking a multi-quarter low that suggests reduced appetite for DeFi protocols and the kinds of capital-intensive activity that historically sustain higher gas demand. Network fees have also cooled, averaging roughly $13.7 million over the past 30 days—well below late-2025 levels—and hint at a softer cadence of user activity and contract interaction. Against this backdrop, sentiment around encoding and data processing on the network remains subdued, with potential knock-on effects for validators and ecosystem development projects.
Beyond the on-chain and derivatives signals, a notable social and governance dynamic has fed into the mood music. A recent round of ETH sales linked to donations associated with Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder, drew additional attention. In January, Buterin earmarked a considerable tranche of ETH—16,384 ETH—for philanthropic purposes spanning privacy-focused technologies, open-source hardware, and secure, verifiable software systems. While charitable in nature, the sale added a layer of bearish optics during a week already defined by fragile confidence and risk-off trading. The optics reflect a broader theme: even constructive or altruistic actions can weigh on investor sentiment when market participants are looking for signals of durable demand recovery.
Further pressure has come from ETF-related trends. Outflows from Ether ETFs have been persistent, with US-listed Ether ETFs recording net withdrawals that have pushed total assets under management down to around $12.4 billion. The pace of withdrawals has accelerated since mid-February, contributing to a sense that institutional players are rebalancing away from Ether in favor of other assets or strategies. The development occurs alongside broader gold-market activity, where gold ETFs saw sizable inflows in the latest reporting period, highlighting a contrast in capital allocation across traditional and crypto-linked investment products.
From a price-movement standpoint, Ether remains tightly correlated with Bitcoin, a relationship that has historically amplified both upside and downside in periods of macro-driven risk appetite. The 20-day correlation between Ether and Bitcoin has hovered in the high 90s, illustrating how a single market narrative—risk-off sentiment—can pull both assets in the same direction for extended stretches. This correlation complicates a clean technical recovery play for Ether, as a broad risk-off backdrop can forestall sustained rallies even when Ether-specific catalysts emerge.
Amid this confluence of signals, traders face a difficult calibration: hedge protection while recognizing the potential for further declines, weigh the durability of on-chain usage against the immediate squeeze on liquidity, and monitor the evolving flow dynamics that continue to shape institutional positioning. The current environment is not merely about price—it is about the balance between hedging demand, network activity, and the liquidity hooks that can either slow or accelerate a potential drag on Ether’s value.
The broader backdrop remains essential. As risk sentiment in crypto persists in a cautious mode and macro flow regimes continue to influence asset dispersion, Ether’s path will depend as much on the resilience of hedging mechanisms and ETF liquidity as on any single protocol upgrade or on-chain development. The market is currently prioritizing protection over speculation, and until derivatives metrics stabilize and on-chain usage strengthens, the path of least resistance could tilt lower rather than higher.
Market context: The current dynamics place Ether in a broader risk-off framework where liquidity, hedging, and ETF flows weigh as heavily as on-chain activity in determining near-term momentum. In such an environment, macro catalysts and cross-asset capital allocation will continue to shape the trajectory of Ether alongside Bitcoin and other major crypto benchmarks.
Why it matters
For investors, the confluence of a price drop, rising hedging activity, and persistent ETF outflows signals a period of heightened caution. The absence of a clear catalyst for a fast revival raises the probability that Ether could test lower supports before any durable recovery materializes. Traders must weigh the cost of hedges against the risk of a deeper drawdown, particularly in a landscape where futures positions can unwind rapidly in response to new macro cues.
For builders and protocol participants, the softness in on-chain activity and the readiness of markets to hedge rather than deploy funds may influence decisions around network improvements, layer-2 integrations, and development roadmaps. A sustained reduction in network usage could impact fee-based incentives for validators and the long-term economic design of the platform, prompting a closer look at throughput solutions and utilization strategies.
For policymakers and institutional watchers, the flow dynamics around Ether ETFs and other crypto investment products offer insight into how mainstream capital is approaching crypto assets during stress. The rate of outflows and the resilience of liquidity in key products can inform discussions about product design, investor protection, and the evolving regulatory framework governing crypto markets.
What to watch next
- Monitor Ether’s price action around the $1,800 level for any decisive break or a potential bounce in the next 1–2 weeks.
- Track Ether ETF inflows/outflows and any new filings or product adjustments that could signal shifting institutional appetite.
- Watch Deribit and other venues for changes in put-call ratios and delta skew, which would indicate evolving hedging pressure.
- Observe on-chain metrics like TVL and network fees for any uptick in activity that could precede a tactical recovery.
- Keep an eye on the 20-day ETH/BTC correlation, as a sustained decoupling would be a meaningful sign of evolving market dynamics.
Sources & verification
- ETH price movement to around $1,800 and the $224 million leveraged liquidations over 48 hours.
- Deribit-based derivatives data showing a 2.2x put-to-call premium and an 18% delta skew for ETH options.
- Ethereum network metrics: TVL at $51 billion and 30-day network fees at $13.7 million.
- Vitalik Buterin’s ETH sale tied to donations for privacy-focused technologies and open-source hardware (ETH donations noted in January).
- US-listed Ether ETF net outflows totaling approximately $405 million since Feb. 11, with AUM around $12.4 billion.
- BTC–ETH 20-day correlation readings indicating tight co-movement over recent weeks.
BTC fell about 5% in days as tariffs and geopolitics drove downside risk.
Summary
- BTC is in a sharp correction similar to equities, with renewed tariff uncertainty and geopolitical tensions cited as primary downside catalysts in the short term.
- Kraken VP Matt Howells-Barby flags ~$60k as critical support and warns a breakdown could open a path toward the mid-to-low $50k range.
- Historically, BTC has not bottomed until the 50-week MA drops below the 100-week MA in a death cross, implying potential further downside before a durable floor forms.
Matt Howells-Barby, Vice President of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, identified critical price levels for Bitcoin as the digital asset undergoes a correction, according to statements from the executive.
Howells-Barby stated that Bitcoin is experiencing a sharp correction similar to movements in equity markets, with uncertainty surrounding tariffs cited as one of the primary factors driving the decline. The executive drew comparisons to macroeconomic pressure observed in April of the previous year, noting that geopolitical tensions could present additional downside risks in the short term.
The Kraken executive pointed to a critical support level as a technically significant threshold. According to Howells-Barby, a break below this support could push Bitcoin prices down to the lower-to-mid range.
Howells-Barby referenced historical data indicating that Bitcoin typically does not establish a clear bottom until the 50-week moving average falls below the 100-week moving average, a technical pattern known as a “death cross.” The absence of such a cross suggests the possibility of further declines extending below the lower range, according to the analysis.
Market analysts indicate that volatility may remain elevated in the current environment, with investors advised to focus on risk management strategies.
The crypto market crash gained steam today, February 24, with Bitcoin falling below the crucial support level at $65,000 and nearing its lowest level this month.
Summary
- The crypto market crash gained momentum on Tuesday.
- This retreat coincided with the ongoing risk-off sentiment.
- The retreat happened as the futures open interest continues falling.
Bitcoin (BTC) was trading at $63,000, while top altcoins like Ethereum (ETH), Ripple (XRP), and Solana (SOL) fell by over 4% in the last 24 hours. The market capitalization of all tokens tracked by CoinMarketCap dropped by 4.23% in the last 24 hours to over $2.18 trillion.
Crypto market crash accelerates as risk-off sentiment prevails
One major risk for the crypto market crash is that investors have largely embraced a risk-off sentiment this week. This view is supported by the view that the VIX Index jumped by over 15% on Monday as the US stock market dropped by over 1%. Gold price continued rising this week and is slowly nearing the all-time high.
Market participants have embraced a risk-off sentiment because of the potential war in Iran, which President Trump is considering. He has made the biggest military deployment in the region in decades and hinted that he will make a limited attack to force the Iranians to a deal.
A limited attack by the United States may lead to a prolonged war in the region. Such a war would lead to a surge in crude oil and natural gas prices, which would stimulate inflation in her region. Also, Bitcoin has proven that it is not a safe-haven asset.
The risk-off sentiment has also jumped because of the fear in the artificial intelligence industry. These fears have knocked many stocks, including companies like IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce. In most cases, the crypto market tends to crash when stocks are not doing well.
The crypto market crash happened after the new Trump tariffs went into effect. Trump launched a 10% tariff on all goods coming to the US using Section 122. He is also eying more tariffs after launching several investigations.
Crypto prices sink amid weak technicals and falling open interest
The other reason why the crypto market is crashing is that the futures open interest continued falling. Data compiled by CoinGlass shows that open interest has dropped to $90 billion. Falling open interest is a sign of weak demand.
This retreat has coincided with the ongoing ETF outflows. Data shows that spot BTC outflows jumped to over $203 million on Monday, bringing the cumulative total in the last four months to over $7 billion. Ethereum ETF outflows have also continued accelerating.
Technicals have also contributed to the ongoing crypto market crash. The daily chart shows that the BTC price dropped after forming a bearish pennant pattern. It also remains below all moving averages and the Supertrend indicator. Therefore, the coin may continue falling to $50,000, which may lead to more downside.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Down 49.53% From ATH: How Far Can BTC Fall Before This Bear Market Finds a Bottom?
TLDR:
- Bitcoin has fallen 49.53% from its October 6, 2025 ATH, wiping out roughly $1.2 trillion in total market cap.
- The BPDA% metric sits deep below its one-year average, signaling extreme stress, capitulation, and widespread panic selling.
- Bitcoin’s Realized Price near $54,600 marks a historically significant accumulation zone during past bear market cycles.
- The $49,000 to $42,000 range holds the highest probability of bear exhaustion and may signal the start of the next cycle.
Bitcoin’s 49.53% decline from its all-time high has wiped out roughly $1.2 trillion in market value. The drop has renewed serious debate about how far this bear market can extend.
On October 6, 2025, Bitcoin’s market cap sat at $2.4891 trillion. Today, it has fallen to $1.2918 trillion. With extreme fear gripping the market and macro pressures mounting, analysts are now mapping the levels where Bitcoin could finally find its floor.
On-Chain Data Points to Where Bitcoin’s Decline May Stall
The BTC Price Drawdown Analysis (BPDA%) is one metric drawing close attention right now. When this reading falls far below its one-year average, it historically marks phases of stress, capitulation, and panic. That is exactly where it stands at this moment.
Crypto analyst GugaOnChain flagged this condition, noting that the current drawdown places Bitcoin in extreme stress territory.
Macro factors are adding pressure, particularly the 10% global tariffs announced by the Trump administration. These developments have kept fear elevated across broader risk markets.
Source: Cryptoquant
When BPDA% sits near its one-year average, the market is considered to be within a normal historical pattern. A reading well above that average typically signals recovery or relative stability. Neither condition applies today, which is why analysts continue watching lower levels carefully.
The data, therefore, suggests the correction may not be over. However, history also shows that readings this deep tend to precede meaningful accumulation phases. The question now is which price level triggers that shift.
Four Price Levels That Could Determine How Low Bitcoin Goes
GugaOnChain identified four support zones that may define Bitcoin’s downside from here. The $60,000 level is the nearest, though it is considered less likely to hold as a durable bottom given current momentum.
Below that, Bitcoin’s Realized Price near $54,600 becomes relevant. This metric reflects the average price at which all coins last moved on-chain. Historically, the Realized Price has acted as a magnet for accumulation activity during bear markets.
Further down, the $49,000 region carries the highest probability of bear exhaustion based on the analysis. This zone has previously drawn in long-term holders who view deep corrections as entry opportunities rather than reasons to exit.
The $42,000 level represents the most extreme scenario outlined in the data. While it would place a large portion of the market in unrealized loss, GugaOnChain describes it as an excellent area for initial long-term entries.
If on-chain metrics confirm seller exhaustion at any of these levels, the range between $49,000 and $42,000 could mark not just the bottom of this bear market, but the foundation for Bitcoin’s next major cycle.
(VIDEO) Detroit Lions to Play 2026 Regular-Season Game in Munich, Germany, as NFL Expands International Slate
Ondo Finance Bridges Institutional and Retail RWA Markets via XRP Ledger and Stellar
College Sprinter Killed in Stabbing, Athlete GF Charged W/ Murder
-
Video5 days agoXRP News: XRP Just Entered a New Phase (Almost Nobody Noticed)
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Boden – Corporette.com
-
Politics3 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Sports1 day agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Entertainment6 days agoKunal Nayyar’s Secret Acts Of Kindness Sparks Online Discussion
-
Politics1 day agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Tech7 days agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Sports6 days agoClearing the boundary, crossing into history: J&K end 67-year wait, enter maiden Ranji Trophy final | Cricket News
-
Business2 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Crypto World17 hours agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Business2 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Entertainment6 days agoDolores Catania Blasts Rob Rausch For Turning On ‘Housewives’ On ‘Traitors’
-
Business7 days agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Tech2 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat2 days ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
NewsBeat2 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics2 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
Crypto World6 days agoWLFI Crypto Surges Toward $0.12 as Whale Buys $2.75M Before Trump-Linked Forum
-
Tech6 hours agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting
-
NewsBeat2 hours agoPolice latest as search for missing woman enters day nine