Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Alphabet (GOOGL) Stock Dips Despite Waymo Milestone and Strong Search Performance

Published

on

GOOGL Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • Waymo’s autonomous vehicles have logged 170.7 million miles in rider-only mode, achieving approximately 10 times fewer serious accidents than human-operated vehicles
  • Morgan Stanley maintains its Buy recommendation on GOOGL with a $330 target, highlighting Waymo’s accelerated expansion timeline
  • Evercore ISI sustains its Outperform stance with a $400 price objective following survey data revealing Google’s search market share rose from 70% to 75% between August 2025 and March 2026
  • ChatGPT experienced a decline in search market presence from 13% to 11% during the identical timeframe; 52% of generative AI users reported increased Google search activity
  • The tech giant has declined approximately 7% in 2026 and sits roughly 17% below its $349 peak from February, though nearly 90% of Wall Street analysts maintain Buy ratings

Alphabet (GOOGL) shares retreated 2% during Thursday’s early session to $285.27, caught in broader market turbulence. The S&P 500 declined 0.8% while the Dow Jones fell 0.4%, as oil prices surged over 4%.


GOOGL Stock Card
Alphabet Inc., GOOGL

The selloff occurred even as the company received encouraging assessments from two prominent Wall Street firms — Morgan Stanley and Evercore ISI — highlighting strength in both its autonomous driving division and core search business.

Brian Nowak, analyst at Morgan Stanley, maintained his Buy recommendation alongside a $330 price objective, noting that “Waymo continues to scale faster than expected…leading with safety.” The autonomous vehicle unit’s latest metrics, covering operations through December 2025, reveal 170.7 million miles driven without human supervision.

These results exceeded Morgan Stanley’s internal projections.

The safety metrics remain impressive. Waymo documented approximately a tenfold reduction in serious collisions and a fivefold decrease in injury-producing accidents when compared to human-driven vehicles.

Waymo’s service currently spans 10 American metropolitan areas. Nowak anticipates the rollout of 15 additional cities throughout this year, coupled with vehicle fleet expansion in markets already operational. Financial analysts generally project robo-taxi operations will at least double annually over the coming years.

Advertisement

Alphabet is committing substantial capital to support this expansion trajectory. The corporation is expected to allocate over $170 billion toward new infrastructure in 2026 — a significant jump from $91 billion in 2025 — per FactSet estimates. This represents considerable capital deployment, even for a technology giant of this scale.

Google’s Search Dominance Remains Intact

Regarding search operations, Evercore ISI confirmed its Outperform assessment and $400 price objective after publishing findings from its eighth consecutive quarterly proprietary search behavior study.

The research demonstrated Google’s search market penetration expanding from 70% to 75% during the August 2025 through March 2026 period. Simultaneously, ChatGPT’s search presence contracted from 13% to 11%.

Evercore reported no meaningful shift in Google’s portion of commercial-intent queries — activities such as purchasing apparel or reserving travel — across the previous two years.

Advertisement

The investment firm increased conviction in its above-consensus Google Search revenue expansion forecast of 14%-plus for 2026, exceeding Wall Street’s 13% consensus. The outlook incorporates anticipated high-single-digit advancement in both paid click volume and cost-per-click metrics.

One advertiser documented conversion rates that doubled — jumping from 7% in Q1 2025 to 14% in Q1 2026. Advertising expenditure patterns remained generally stable or showed acceleration on a year-over-year basis entering Q1, although Evercore noted some hesitation developing within the past 10 days.

Current Stock Position

GOOGL has fallen approximately 7% year-to-date and trades roughly 17% beneath its 52-week peak of $349, reached in February. The majority of the 2026 decline has materialized following the onset of the Iran conflict.

Notwithstanding the downturn, close to 90% of equity analysts tracking the stock assign it a Buy rating — substantially above the standard 55%–60% Buy-rating percentage for S&P 500 constituents. The consensus analyst price target hovers around $380, elevated from approximately $335 at 2026’s beginning.

Advertisement

Alphabet’s revenue expanded 15% during the trailing twelve months, with analysts projecting 17% growth for fiscal 2026. The equity currently carries a P/E ratio of 26.91 alongside a PEG ratio of 0.77.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bernstein Calls Bitcoin Bottom and Sets 226% Upside Target for Strategy

Published

on

🚨

Bernstein has called a Bitcoin bottom and set a $450 price target on Strategy stock, 226% above Monday’s closing price of $138.20. The call comes from analyst Gautam Chhugani at a firm managing nearly $880 billion in assets, which means this is not a retail sentiment spike. It is institutional research drawing a line in the sand on the BTC-equity trade.

Key Takeaways:
  • Bitcoin Bottom Call: Bernstein’s Gautam Chhugani identifies the current drawdown — 44% from Bitcoin’s $126,210 all-time high — as a cycle bottom supported by ETF inflows and corporate treasury buying.
  • Strategy Upside Target: Bernstein sets a $450 price target on Strategy stock, implying 226% upside from $138.20, backed by $56 billion in Bitcoin and cash against $18 billion in total debt.
  • Institutional Signal: Bitcoin ETFs absorbed $2.2 billion in net inflows over four weeks, flipping year-to-date flows positive; FMR, BlackRock, Capital Group, and VanEck now hold 23% of Strategy’s STRC preferred shares.

Discover: The best crypto presales gaining institutional momentum right now

Bernstein Bitcoin Bottom Case: What the Data Shows

Bitcoin peaked at $126,210 on October 6, 2025. A flash crash on October 10, triggered by leveraged liquidations, initiated the correction, compounded by late February 2026 U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran, and Bitcoin still held a floor near $71,000.

Advertisement

Chhugani frames the 44% drawdown as evidence of maturation, not breakdown: institutional demand absorbed the selling pressure that, in prior cycles, would have driven 70–80% wipeouts.

The ETF data reinforces the case. Bitcoin ETFs recorded $2.2 billion in net inflows over the four weeks preceding Bernstein’s note, reversing year-to-date outflows and pushing the net 2026 figure to positive $364 million against a $90 billion asset base.

ETFs now hold 6.1% of the total Bitcoin supply. That is a structural bid, not a momentum trade, and it is exactly the kind of price floor institutional demand analysis has pointed toward throughout this correction cycle.

Advertisement

Bernstein’s year-end Bitcoin target is $150,000, contingent on sustained institutional buying through mid-2026 amid geopolitical headwinds. The bottom call is not a chart pattern. It is a capital flows argument.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Strategy’s Bitcoin Treasury: The Math Behind 226% Upside

Strategy holds 762,099 BTC, acquired most recently with a 1,031 BTC purchase last week, valued at approximately $51.43 billion.

Advertisement
(Source – StrategyTracker)

Total balance sheet Bitcoin and cash stands at $56 billion against $18 billion in total debt, per Bernstein. Cash reserves alone cover annual dividend and interest obligations for 25 months. The Bitcoin position covers annual financing costs for approximately 50 years.

The leverage mechanism is straightforward: Strategy stock amplifies Bitcoin moves because each share represents a claim on a BTC treasury that grows as the company raises capital and buys more coin.

At $138.20, Bernstein’s $450 target prices in a Bitcoin recovery toward the $150,000 level while assigning value to the capital-raising machine itself — the $42 billion raise split between Class A common stock and perpetual preferred shares, with $6.24 billion in ATM program capacity still available across a 19-agent sales syndicate.

The STRC preferred share launched in July 2025, paying an 11.5% annual dividend monthly. Thirty-day average daily STRC volume hit $220 million, up 65% over three months, making it the most liquid preferred product in its category. Strategy is down 57% over six months and 59% over twelve months, reflecting dilution concerns from ongoing equity raises.

The stock has recovered 10.9% over the past month. Bernstein is betting the dilution discount is already priced in.

Advertisement

Discover: The best crypto presales gaining institutional momentum right now

The post Bernstein Calls Bitcoin Bottom and Sets 226% Upside Target for Strategy appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tether Crypto Secures Big Four Auditor for Full USDT Transparency Review

Published

on

Tether Crypto Secures Big Four Auditor for Full USDT Transparency Review

Tether crypto has engaged an unnamed Big Four accounting firm for a comprehensive financial statement audit of USDT, announced March 24, 2026.

The stablecoin now carries a $184 billion market cap and supports more than 550 million users worldwide, making this the largest-scope inaugural audit in digital asset history.

This is not an incremental compliance step. It is a structural reclassification of how Tether’s reserves are verified.

Key Takeaways:
Advertisement
  • Audit Scope: The Big Four engagement covers a full financial statement opinion across digital assets, traditional reserves, and tokenized liabilities — replacing point-in-time attestations from BDO Italia used since 2021.
  • Scale: USDT’s $184 billion market cap and 550 million global users make this the largest inaugural Big Four audit ever conducted on a stablecoin.
  • Selection Process: CFO Simon McWilliams confirms the firm was chosen through a competitive process, with Tether asserting it already meets Big Four operational standards ahead of engagement.

Discover: The best crypto presales gaining institutional momentum right now

The Mechanics: Attestation vs. Full Financial Audit

Tether’s prior arrangement with BDO Italia produced quarterly attestations, agreed-upon procedures that confirmed asset existence at a specific point in time.

They did not constitute an audit opinion on whether financial statements fairly present Tether’s overall position. That distinction matters enormously to institutional counterparties and regulators.

A full Big Four audit requires the firm to independently examine Tether’s complete reserve structure: U.S. Treasuries, cash equivalents, commercial paper holdings, digital asset positions, and tokenized liabilities.

The auditor issues a formal opinion on whether those financials are presented fairly in accordance with recognized accounting standards. The scope here is wider than any prior stablecoin audit on record.

CEO Paolo Ardoino states: “This audit represents years of work to strengthen our systems so that Tether can meet the highest standards applied in global finance.” CFO Simon McWilliams adds that the firm “was selected through a competitive process because the organisation is already operating at Big Four audit standard.” The firm’s identity has not been disclosed. One of Deloitte, EY, KPMG, or PwC is now inside Tether’s books.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Advertisement

The Strategic Signal: Why This Changes Tether Crypto Institutional Profile

Tether has operated under institutional skepticism for five years. A $41 million CFTC fine in October 2021 followed misleading claims about full USD backing.

An $18.5 million settlement with the New York Attorney General in February 2021 centered on reserve transparency failures. Both actions left a credibility gap that quarterly attestations never fully closed.

The Big Four engagement closes that gap structurally, not rhetorically. Dr. Anya Petrova of the Global Digital Finance Institute calls it “the gold standard of financial credibility,” adding it “could significantly lower the perceived risk premium for institutions interacting with the USDT ecosystem.” That risk premium has been the primary barrier to sovereign, pension, and prime brokerage exposure to USDT-denominated instruments.

The timing aligns with a broader regulatory tightening across digital assets. The CFTC’s Innovation Task Force is actively restructuring oversight frameworks for crypto derivatives — and stablecoin reserve transparency is a core compliance variable in that architecture. Tether’s audit positions USDT ahead of any reserve disclosure mandate, rather than behind it.

That is a deliberate strategic posture, not a coincidence. As the Ripple RLUSD pilot with MAS demonstrates, institutional-grade stablecoins now compete on compliance infrastructure as much as liquidity depth.

Discover: The best crypto presales gaining institutional momentum right now

Advertisement

The post Tether Crypto Secures Big Four Auditor for Full USDT Transparency Review appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Best Buy (BBY) Shares Surge 5% Amid GameStop (GME) Acquisition Rumors

Published

on

BBY Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • Best Buy (BBY) shares climbed 5.3% amid rumors of a potential GameStop (GME) acquisition
  • GameStop’s CEO Ryan Cohen announced in January his pursuit of a “very, very, very big” consumer company acquisition
  • GameStop’s recent 10-K revealed approximately $0.7 billion pledged as collateral for derivative transactions
  • Gordon Haskett’s Don Bilson identified “prime broker action” in BBY during Q4 while questioning the timeline alignment
  • GameStop (GME) shares declined 2.3% during the same trading session; the company has remained silent on inquiries

Shares of Best Buy (BBY) experienced a notable 5.3% climb on Wednesday following widespread speculation that GameStop (GME) may be positioning itself to acquire the electronics retail giant.


BBY Stock Card
Best Buy Co., Inc., BBY

The acquisition chatter traces back to remarks from GameStop Chairman and CEO Ryan Cohen during late January, where he expressed his ambition to execute a “very, very, very big” acquisition of a substantial consumer-focused company — characterizing it as a potentially transformational move for GameStop.

The speculation intensified following GameStop’s most recent 10-K filing, which revealed the company “posted approximately $0.7 billion of cash into an account that is pledged as collateral for certain existing and potential cash or physically settled derivative transactions.”

According to Gordon Haskett analyst Don Bilson, evidence suggests GameStop has established a swap position and appears to be evaluating potential acquisition candidates. However, he refrained from identifying a specific target company.

Bilson had earlier mentioned Best Buy as a plausible candidate, citing prime broker movements in BBY throughout the fourth quarter. Nevertheless, he acknowledged a potential timing discrepancy — the observed activity doesn’t perfectly align with GameStop’s disclosure indicating capital deployment occurred after its fiscal year conclusion.

Advertisement

Despite these uncertainties, market participants reacted enthusiastically, driving BBY shares significantly higher.

GameStop has not issued any response to media inquiries regarding the speculation. The company’s stock declined 2.3% during the same trading period.

Best Buy’s Current Financial Standing

Best Buy maintains a market capitalization of approximately $13.58 billion. Trailing twelve-month revenue reaches $41.69 billion, although the retailer’s 3-year revenue growth rate registers at -1.4%.

Profit margins remain modest, with operating margins at 4.2% and net margins at 2.56% — both showing declining trends in recent periods. Insider activity has leaned toward selling, with six transactions totaling 77,247 shares executed over the previous three months.

Advertisement

From a valuation perspective, however, the metrics present a more compelling narrative. Best Buy’s price-to-earnings ratio of 12.89 hovers near its 3-year minimum. Similarly, the P/S ratio of 0.34 and P/B ratio of 4.58 are approaching historical lows, suggesting potential undervaluation.

The relative strength index currently stands at 37.79, approaching oversold conditions.

Underlying Financial Resilience

Notwithstanding revenue challenges, Best Buy demonstrates robust financial health indicators. The company’s Altman Z-Score of 4.13 and Piotroski F-Score of 7 both signal strong balance sheet fundamentals.

Wall Street analysts have established an average price target of $73.32, accompanied by a recommendation score of 2.7 — reflecting measured optimism.

Advertisement

Best Buy maintains operations across approximately 1,068 retail locations through its Domestic and International divisions, spanning computing, mobile devices, appliances, consumer electronics, entertainment products, and related services.

The stock’s beta coefficient of 1.69 indicates heightened sensitivity to broader market movements — a relevant consideration given Wednesday’s rapid response to acquisition speculation.

GameStop has not publicly confirmed any specific acquisition target, and no formal proposal or regulatory filing has been disclosed to date.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

‘Active Treasury’ is a dangerous misnomer that must not be ignored

Published

on

‘Active Treasury’ is a dangerous misnomer that must not be ignored

Opinion by: Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-founder at Zignaly and ZIGChain

Digital asset treasury companies (DATCOs) are facing a classification problem that the market can no longer ignore.  

DATCOs were built to hold crypto. Increasingly, they’re being forced to decide whether they want to own assets or operate the systems those assets run on.

Index providers are now openly debating whether these businesses still resemble operating companies or whether they function more like investment vehicles. 

Advertisement

Recently, we saw MSCI’s note that it would keep “digital asset treasury companies” in its indexes for now, while launching a broader consultation on how they should be classified going forward.

That hesitation reflects a deeper uncertainty about what these companies have become. The model that once defined these companies’ passive balance sheet exposure to Bitcoin is already starting to fracture.

The cost of moving beyond simplicity

What’s emerging in its place is not a cleaner or safer evolution, but a materially riskier one.

The industry has rebranded this shift as “active treasury management,” a phrase that understates the risks being introduced and obscures what is actually changing. In practice, it means moving beyond passive exposure into operational strategies that introduce new layers of risk, leverage and governance complexity. 

Advertisement

Once DATCOs cross that threshold, they are no longer just holders of digital assets. That means we need to have regulators, index providers and investors treat them accordingly, as ultimately, operators are judged by execution, not conviction.

The first phase of DATCOs was straightforward: Hold Bitcoin, communicate long-term conviction and allow balance sheet exposure to do the rest. That simplicity mattered to boards, auditors and index providers, and it kept outcomes tied to broader macro forces rather than execution risk.

The second phase is fundamentally different. As competition increases and simple exposure becomes less compelling, treasury companies are being pushed to manufacture yield. Various reports in 2026 have indicated that a growing number of crypto treasury companies are expanding beyond Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) into more volatile tokens to boost returns. That strategy may improve short-term performance optics, but it steepens tail risk dramatically. In stressed conditions, these positions are more likely to unwind quickly and in a correlated fashion precisely when liquidity is most fragile.

Exposure becomes responsibility

There’s a quiet shift happening in how institutions engage with blockchain. Instead of treating networks purely as assets to hold, some are beginning to participate at the infrastructure layer by running validator nodes, adding to network security and taking part in governance.

Advertisement

Any yield that comes from this is incidental; the primary focus is on reliability, control and active involvement in systems that now support real economic activity.

Any yield that comes from this is incidental; the primary focus is on reliability, control and active involvement in systems that now support real economic activity. This represents a fundamental change in what these companies actually do.

Validator operations introduce protocol level obligations that boards cannot treat as ancillary. Slashing risk, uptime guarantees, key management, client concentration and governance participation are not abstract technical issues.  These are core business risks, exposing companies to forms of liability and reputational damage that passive asset holding never created. 

At that point, a DATCO is no longer merely exposed to market volatility. It is exposed to operational failure, governance decisions and protocol level outcomes. That leaves only two coherent identities: an operating company with formal controls, or a fund with explicit fiduciary obligations. The real danger lies in occupying the space between the two.

Advertisement

Related: Digital asset treasuries that only hodl may fall short

Active treasury strategies blur the line between corporate finance and delegated investment management. When companies pursue yield through staking, token rotation or infrastructure participation, they are making discretionary allocation decisions on behalf of shareholders. Those decisions carry risk profiles that look far closer to fund management than to treasury stewardship.

No governance, no right to be active

If DATCOs want to avoid being treated as unregulated investment vehicles, they need to adopt fund-grade guardrails. That means clear disclosures around strategy and risk. It means segregation of duties between custody, execution and risk oversight.

It means independent controls, audit-ready reporting and stress testing that models correlated drawdowns and protocol-level failures, not just price volatility.

Advertisement

Most importantly, it means boards formally recognizing protocol exposure and governance influence as core risks, not experimental upside.

Without those safeguards, “active treasury” becomes a euphemism for leverage without accountability.

This shift also exposes a second gap: infrastructure. Combining tokenized assets, staking income and compliance obligations inside a single mandate is not something legacy systems were designed to handle. Nor can it be safely managed through ad hoc wallets, spreadsheets or loosely governed smart contracts.

Institutional onchain rails will need to support delegated execution, policy driven controls and auditable workflows if DATCOs are going to operate at scale without amplifying systemic risk. That infrastructure must treat operational risk with the same seriousness as market risk because in active treasury models, the two are inseparable.

Advertisement

The consultation underway at MSCI should not be viewed as a threat to the sector. It is a signal that the easy phase is over. As DATCOs evolve into active operators from passive holders, the market will demand clarity about what these companies are and what risks they are taking.

Those that chase yield without guardrails may discover that classification was the least of their problems, because by the time the market reacts, the risks will already be embedded.

Opinion by: Abdul Rafay Gadit, co-Founder at Zignaly and ZIGChain.