Crypto World
Altcoin spot sell pressure hits 5-year high at -$209b
Cumulative spot selling pressure across altcoins, excluding Bitcoin and Ethereum, has reached a five-year extreme, according to data released by CryptoQuant, marking one of the most persistent distribution phases in recent market cycles.
Summary
- Cumulative altcoin buy-sell difference excluding BTC, ETH widened to about -$209b over 13 straight months, the most sell-dominant phase in 5 years.
- Indicator was near $0 in Jan 2025 before prolonged selling, signaling structural outflows, fading retail demand, and little visible institutional accumulation in altcoins.
- BTC trades well below its Oct 2025 ATH, while altcoin spot markets remain under pressure, with past cycle reversals only emerging after sustained net buying replaces directional sellin
The cumulative buy-sell difference for altcoins now stands at negative 209 billion, reflecting 13 consecutive months of net selling on centralized exchanges, the data showed.
In January 2025, cumulative buy and sell pressure across altcoins was roughly balanced, marking the last point where demand matched supply, according to the analysis. Since then, altcoins have recorded a cumulative negative 209 billion in net sell pressure over the following 13 months, with limited evidence of sustained buying activity.
Bitcoin currently trades well below its October 2025 all-time high. While Bitcoin has retraced from peak levels, altcoins have experienced stronger structural pressure, the data indicated. The absence of net positive inflows suggests retail participation has declined, with capital rotation toward major cryptocurrencies occurring earlier in the cycle, according to market observers. Institutional accumulation in altcoins remains limited, the data showed.
Bitcoin trading as alt-coin difference expands
A cumulative negative 209 billion reading signals that supply has consistently exceeded demand, though it does not automatically indicate a market bottom, analysts noted. Extended net selling phases can persist until liquidity conditions improve or new capital enters the market, according to historical patterns.
Durable market reversals have historically occurred only after sustained buying activity replaces directional selling, market data shows. Altcoin spot markets remain under pressure and demand recovery has not yet materialized, according to the CryptoQuant analysis.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is moving closer to a pilot for a digital euro, with Executive Board Member Piero Cipollone outlining plans to begin selecting payment service providers (PSPs) in early 2026, ahead of a 12-month test scheduled for the second half of 2027.
Cipollone on Wednesday held an executive committee meeting of the Italian Banking Association. He said the pilot would involve a limited number of payment service providers, merchants and Eurosystem staff. Selection of participating providers is expected to start in the first quarter of 2026.
Cipollone said the digital euro will be designed to ensure it protects European card schemes and keeps banks at the core of the Eurozone payments system, according to Reuters.
Pilot could give PSPs an early start
European Union-licensed PSPs will be at the core of digital euro distribution, Cipollone said. For participating PSPs, the pilot offers an early-readiness advantage ahead of a potential broader rollout, including hands-on experience with onboarding, settlement and liquidity management.
He added that it also provides clearer visibility on future infrastructure, compliance and staffing costs, helping companies plan investments more accurately.
With direct Eurosystem support and the ability to feed into the design process, participants should gain both operational insight and influence over how the digital euro ultimately takes shape.
Stablecoins are not the only threat to banks, says Cipollone
The digital euro pilot is also intended to protect domestic European payment projects, such as Italy’s Bancomat card network and Spain’s Bizum peer-to-peer system.
“Banks could lose their role in payments not just because of stablecoins but also due to other private solutions,” Cipollone said, pointing to Europe’s heavy reliance on international card networks like Visa and Mastercard.
He added that the digital euro would be structured to preserve the competitiveness of local systems.
“The cap on the fee that merchants will pay on the digital euro network will be lower than what the international payments network, normally the costlier, charge, but higher than what domestic payments scheme, normally the cheapest, charge,” Cipollone said.
Cointelegraph contacted the ECB for comment on the PSP selection but had not received a response by publication.
Related: Lagarde early exit report puts ECB succession and digital euro in focus
The news marks a milestone in the digital euro pilot after the ECB officially moved to the next phase of the project in October 2025, targeting a launch in 2029.
The central bank then projected that a pilot exercise could start in 2027 if legislation is put in place during the course of 2026.
Magazine: Is China hoarding gold so yuan becomes global reserve instead of USD?
The XRP Ledger has activated a new “Permissioned DEX” amendment, a technical upgrade designed to let regulated institutions trade on XRPL without opening markets to everyone.
The change, known as XLS-81, allows the creation of permissioned decentralized exchanges that work like XRPL’s existing built-in DEX, but with a key difference.
A permissioned domain can restrict who is allowed to place offers and who is allowed to accept them, creating a gated trading venue where participation can be tied to compliance requirements such as KYC and AML checks.
Think of it as a ‘members only’ marketplace, while still keeping the trading mechanics native to the ledger.
The feature is aimed at banks, brokers and other firms that may want onchain settlement and liquidity but cannot interact with fully open DeFi markets. For these players, the ability to control access is not optional but forms the minimum requirement.
The activation also adds to a growing set of “institutional DeFi” primitives XRPL has been rolling out this month. Token Escrow, or XLS-85, went live last week, extending XRPL’s native escrow system beyond XRP to all trustline-based tokens and Multi-Purpose Tokens, including stablecoins such as RLUSD and tokenized real-world assets.
Together, the two upgrades create a more complete toolkit for regulated finance on XRPL. Token escrow allows conditional settlement for assets issued on the network, while the permissioned DEX provides a controlled venue for trading them.
That combination is central to use cases like tokenized funds, stablecoin FX rails, and regulated secondary markets for tokenized assets.
While the changes are unlikely to matter to most retail traders day to day, they signal XRPL’s direction. It is building infrastructure for institutions first, even if that means leaning into gated markets rather than the fully open DeFi model that defined the last cycle.
CoinDesk Indices presents its daily market update, highlighting the performance of leaders and laggards in the CoinDesk 20 Index.
The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 1962.18, down 0.9% (-18.81) since 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday.
One of the 20 assets is trading higher.
Leaders: CRO (+0.1%) and UNI (-0.3%).
Laggards: APT (-3.0%) and SOL (-2.5%).
The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index traded on multiple platforms in several regions globally.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
MYX has completed and closed a strategic funding round led by Consensys ahead of its V2 launch.
Onchain derivatives protocol MYX has completed a strategic funding round led by Consensys, with participation from Consensys Mesh and Systemic Ventures, ahead of the MYX V2 launch. With the closing of this round, Consensys has officially become the largest investor in MYX. The raise supports the rollout of MYX’s Modular Derivative Settlement Engine, marking the platform’s transition into core infrastructure for omnichain derivatives.
MYX V2 represents a structural shift in how onchain derivatives are built and settled. Rather than operating as a vertically integrated dapp, MYX now serves as a modular settlement layer that other products and platforms can build upon.
At the protocol level, MYX V2 integrates account abstraction via EIP-4337 and EIP-7702 alongside Chainlink’s latest permissionless oracle stack. Together, these components are designed to remove long-standing frictions in onchain trading including slow listings for long-tail assets as well as inefficient use of capital and complex transaction flows.
MYX V2 enables gasless, one-click trading while preserving non-custodial control and introduces a Dynamic Margin system that supports up to 50x leverage without relying on traditional order book depth. This architecture allows MYX to offer oracle-anchored pricing that eliminates slippage for large orders, significantly reducing execution risk for professional traders.
By decoupling liquidity depth from execution quality, MYX aims to eliminate the trade-off between access and execution that onchain perps traders deal with every day. MYX states that with this approach, traders no longer need to wait for deep order books, ladder into positions, or eat slippage when trading size, especially in new or volatile markets. Pricing is anchored directly to oracles rather than transient market depth, allowing positions to be opened and closed at predictable prices regardless of local liquidity conditions.
According to the team, the result is materially lower effective trading costs than underlying spot markets, immediate access to newly emerging assets, and consistent execution even during periods of market stress. These mechanics are not discretionary or market-maker dependent; they are enforced by deterministic economic models, robust margin systems, and conservative security assumptions designed to perform under real trading conditions.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Bitcoin slips ~2% in 7d as MUFG touts stablecoins’ price-stable payments.
Summary
- TC trades near $68k, with a 7d move of about -2.25%, and a 24h range around $66.7k–$69.1k.
- MUFG’s Hardman says stablecoins better meet money’s role via price stability, fast settlement, and low-cost transfers versus BTC’s higher volatility.
- Stablecoins, often fiat-pegged, are gaining attention as digital cash and could see higher adoption in payments while BTC remains mainly a store-of-value asset.
An analyst at Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has stated that stablecoins represent a more suitable currency option than Bitcoin for payment purposes, according to recent commentary from the Japanese financial institution.
Lee Hardman, an analyst at MUFG, one of Japan’s three largest banks, said stablecoins have attracted increased attention compared to other digital assets due to their function as digital cash.
Hardman stated that stablecoins better fulfill the requirements of money by offering price stability and fast, low-cost payment services, according to the analyst’s assessment. The analyst noted that Bitcoin’s high price volatility limits its use as a daily payment method.
Stablecoins are pegged to fiat currencies and maintain stable value, making them more likely to be used as a medium of exchange and payment, Hardman said.
The comments come as interest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies continues to expand globally, with financial institutions increasingly evaluating various digital asset classes for potential use cases.
After the aggressive sell-off toward the $1.8K region, the market has transitioned into choppy consolidation, while lower timeframes are now approaching a decisive breakout point. The key question is whether this compression resolves to the upside or results in continuation within the dominant downtrend structure.
Ethereum Price Analysis: The Daily Chart
On the daily timeframe, Ethereum is exhibiting clear consolidation behaviour following its sharp decline. The price action has become increasingly choppy, reflecting equilibrium between buyers and sellers. Instead of impulsive continuation, the market is printing overlapping candles with limited directional commitment.
This consolidation is confined between the $1.8K static support base and the channel’s midline acting as dynamic resistance. The mid-boundary of the descending channel continues to cap bullish attempts, preventing a structural trend reversal. Meanwhile, the $1.8K zone remains a strong demand area that has repeatedly absorbed selling pressure.
As long as the price remains trapped between these two boundaries, the primary scenario is range-bound fluctuation. A confirmed breakout above the channel’s midline would open the path toward higher resistance zones, while a breakdown below $1.8K would invalidate the equilibrium and likely trigger another impulsive leg lower.
ETH/USDT 4-Hour Chart
Zooming into the 4-hour timeframe, the market structure becomes more compressed. Ethereum has formed a clear triangle pattern, with descending resistance and rising support squeezing the price into a narrow apex. This pattern reflects volatility contraction and typically precedes an expansion phase.
The asset is now approaching the final portion of the triangle, suggesting that a breakout is imminent. Given the recent higher lows inside the pattern and the improving short-term structure, the probability of an upside breakout is increasing. The targets are clearly defined on the chart, with the first resistance zone aligned with the previously marked supply region above the pattern at the $2.4K area.
However, failure to break upward and a decisive breakdown below the ascending support would shift momentum back in favour of sellers.
Sentiment Analysis
The Binance ETH/USDT liquidation heatmap reveals significant liquidity dynamics around the current range. A dense liquidity cluster is positioned above the current price, indicating a concentration of short liquidation levels. Such clusters often act as magnets, drawing the price upward to trigger liquidations before a potential reaction.
At the same time, a developing liquidity concentration below the market reflects the accumulation of long positions. This suggests that traders are increasingly positioning for upside continuation, building long exposure near the consolidation zone.
The interaction between these liquidity pools increases the likelihood of a volatility expansion. A breakout to the upside could trigger short liquidations above the price, accelerating the move. Conversely, a downside sweep could target the long liquidity cluster before a potential rebound.
Overall, Ethereum is in a compression phase. The daily chart reflects equilibrium within a broader downtrend, the 4-hour chart shows a triangle nearing resolution, and liquidity positioning suggests that a decisive breakout move is approaching.
SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
About two-thirds of crypto incidents investigated by blockchain analytics company AMLBot in 2025 were driven by social engineering rather than technical exploits, according to a report based on the company’s internal casework.
AMLBot said 65% of the incidents it reviewed last year involved access and response failures, such as compromised devices, weak verification and delayed detection, instead of vulnerabilities in blockchains or smart contracts.
The company said its analysis drew on about 2,500 internal investigations and should not be read as an industry-wide measure of crypto crime, according to a Wednesday report shared with Cointelegraph.
Primary attack vectors included device compromises via chat scams, impersonation scams, and other investment and phishing scams involving social manipulation.
Crypto phishing attacks are social engineering schemes that don’t require hacking code. Instead, attackers share fraudulent links to steal victims’ sensitive information, such as the private keys to crypto wallets.
The findings suggest that security improvements at the protocol level may not be enough to protect users if scammers can bypass safeguards by targeting people directly.
Investment scams and phishing lead by case count
Investment scams accounted for the largest share of cases (25%), followed by phishing attacks (18%) and device compromises (13%), as the most damaging categories in terms of case frequency.
Related: 22 Bitcoin worth $1.5M vanish from Seoul police custody
Pig-butchering scams accounted for 8%, over-the-counter (OTC) fraud for 8%, and chat-based impersonation represented 7%, collectively making up the second tier of the most frequent attacks.
Impersonation linked to $9 million in recent losses
AMLBot traced at least $9 million in stolen digital assets to impersonation-related attacks over the past three months.
Impersonation is the most damaging attack vector in terms of social engineering scams, Slava Demchuk, CEO of AMLBot, told Cointelegraph. “Attackers continue to exploit and trick victims with a ruthless game of charades, posing as trusted entities,” he said. “Sometimes they’re exchange support teams, investment partners, project managers or reps.”
Demchuk urged users not to share private keys or recovery phrases and to be wary of urgent requests involving fund transfers or wallet access, which he said are common entry points for social engineering scams.
Related: Binance confirms employee targeted as three arrested in France break-in
To protect against impersonation attacks, Demchuk urged crypto investors not to share their private keys and recovery phrases.
He also advised investors to ignore “urgent requests involving fund transfers of wallet access,” which are usually the first point of contact for social engineering scams.
CertiK reports January spike in crypto losses
Crypto scams saw an uptick in January, when scammers stole $370 million, the highest monthly figure in 11 months, according to crypto security company CertiK.
$311 million of the total value was attributed to phishing scams, with a particularly damaging social engineering scam costing one victim around $284 million.
Magazine: Meet the onchain crypto detectives fighting crime better than the cops
A pricing error that lasted only minutes has left DeFi lender Moonwell with nearly $1.8 million in bad debt after a software glitch caused the value of Coinbase Wrapped ETH (cbETH) to drop to $1, instead of roughly $2,200, on the platform.
The technical glitch happened because a system update caused the platform to value cbETH based only on its relationship to ETH (about 1.12), forgetting to factor in the actual USD price of ether.
As a result, the protocol interpreted cbETH as being worth around $1.12, per an incident summary.
The issue began when a governance proposal enabled new Chainlink oracle configurations across Moonwell markets on Base and Optimism networks. An oracle is a tool that fetches real-time data before it is added to a blockchain.
In lending protocols such as Moonwell, users deposit assets like cbETH as collateral and borrow other tokens against them. If collateral falls below required thresholds, positions are automatically liquidated by bots that repay debt and seize collateral at a discount.
Once cbETH appeared to collapse from over $2,000 to just above $1, liquidation bots moved quickly. Because the protocol believed the token was nearly worthless, liquidators were able to repay roughly $1 of debt to seize one cbETH.
Risk manager Anthias Labs said 1,096.317 cbETH ($2.44 million) was seized, wiping out borrower collateral while leaving the protocol with bad debt across several markets.
The distorted pricing also allowed a smaller group of users to deposit minimal collateral and borrow cbETH at the artificially low valuation, further increasing losses.
Moonwell reduced supply and borrow caps within minutes to contain damage. However, correcting the oracle required a governance vote and a five day timelock, preventing an immediate fix.
The episode is the latest reminder that price oracles are foundational infrastructure and a key point of failure for DeFi applications. When they misfire, the smart contracts do exactly what they are programmed to do, but the balance sheet absorbs the consequences.
Meanwhile, security auditor Krum Pashov noted that GitHub commits tied to the proposal were co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6, an AI coding assistant, prompting debate over whether automated “vibe coding” contributed to the faulty oracle logic.
🚨Claude Opus 4.6 wrote vulnerable code, leading to a smart contract exploit with $1.78M loss
cbETH asset’s price was set to $1.12 instead of ~$2,200. The PRs of the project show commits were co-authored by Claude – Is this the first hack of vibe-coded Solidity code? pic.twitter.com/4p78ZZvd67
— pashov (@pashov) February 17, 2026
Moonwell, a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol deployed on Base and Optimism, was exploited for about $1.78 million after a pricing oracle for Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (cbETH) returned a value of about $1.12 instead of $2,200, creating a mispricing that attackers were able to use for profit.
Moonwell said in an incident post-mortem that a governance proposal executed on Sunday misconfigured the cbETH oracle by using the cbETH/ETH exchange rate alone, causing the system to report cbETH at about $1.12. The protocol said liquidation bots and opportunistic borrowers exploited the mispricing, leaving roughly $1.78 million in bad debt.
The pull requests for the affected contracts show multiple commits co-authored by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6, prompting security auditor Pashov to publicly flag the incident as an example of artificial intelligence-written or AI-assisted Solidity backfiring.
Speaking to Cointelegraph about the incident, he said that he had linked the case to Claude because there were multiple commits in the pull requests that were co-authored by Claude, meaning that “the developer was using Claude to write the code, and this has led to the vulnerability.”
Pashov cautioned, however, against treating the flaw as uniquely AI-driven. He described the oracle issue as the kind of mistake “even a senior Solidity developer could have made,” arguing that the real problem was a lack of sufficiently rigorous checks and end-to-end validation.
Initially, he said that he believed there had been no testing or audit at all, but later acknowledged that the team said it had unit and integration tests in a separate pull request and had commissioned an audit from Halborn.
In his view, the mispricing “could have been caught with an integration test, a proper one, integrating with the blockchain,” but he declined to criticise other security firms directly.
Related: How South Korea is using AI to detect crypto market manipulation
Small loss, big governance questions
The dollar amount of the exploit is small compared to some of DeFi’s largest incidents, such as the Ronin bridge exploit in March 2022, where attackers stole more than $600 million, or other nine-figure bridge and lending protocol hacks.
What makes Moonwell notable is the mix of AI co-authorship, a basic-seeming price configuration failure on a major asset, and existing audits and tests that failed to catch it.
Pashov said his own company would not fundamentally change its process, but if code appeared “vibe coded,” his team would “have a bit more wide open eyes” and expect a higher density of low-hanging issues, even though this particular oracle bug “was not that easy” to spot.
“Vibe coding” vs disciplined AI use
Fraser Edwards, co-founder and CEO of cheqd, a decentralized identity infrastructure provider, told Cointelegraph that the debate around vibe coding masks “two very different interpretations” of how AI is used.
Related: How AI crypto trading will make and break human roles
On one side, he said, are non-technical founders prompting AI to generate code they cannot independently review; on the other, experienced developers using AI to accelerate refactors, pattern exploration and testing inside a mature engineering process.
AI-assisted development “can be valuable, particularly at the MVP [minimal viable product] stage,” he noted, but “should not be treated as a shortcut to production-ready infrastructure,” especially in capital-intensive systems like DeFi.
Edwards argued that all AI-generated smart contract code should be treated as untrusted input, subject to strict version control, clear code ownership, multi-person peer review and advanced testing, especially around high-risk areas such as access controls, oracle and pricing logic, and upgrade mechanisms.
“Ultimately, responsible AI integration comes down to governance and discipline,” he said, with clear review gates, separation between code generation and validation, and an assumption that any contract deployed in an adversarial environment may contain latent risk.
Magazine: South Korea gets rich from crypto… North Korea gets weapons
Crypto World
American crypto investors are scared, confused about this year’s new IRS transaction reporting
A recent poll of 1,000 American investors in digital assets found that over half are scared they’ll face an IRS tax penalty this year as new transparency rules governing crypto exchanges take effect.
The data collected at the end of January by crypto tax platform Awaken Tax canvassed U.S. holders’ concerns about a radical shift from self-disclosure to automatic reporting of transactions.
This has been enacted through the introduction of the “Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions,” or Form 1099-DA, which tens of millions of Americans will be made aware of over the next month or so.
The new rules are designed to clamp down on crypto tax evasion and compel brokers, such as crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN), to report all sales and exchanges of digital assets that took place during 2025 to the tax agency.
The aim is to give tax authorities a clear view of investor gains and losses by opening up customer data inside exchanges for the first time, allowing the IRS to compare what crypto brokers report with what taxpayers file.
While the goal is to remove any margin of error, the rules are a “blunt instrument,” created by legislators who know nothing about crypto, according to Awaken Tax founder Andrew Duca.
“It means crypto is being treated like stocks, but it doesn’t behave in that way. Real crypto users will move assets between multiple wallets and interact with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, using pretty complex trading strategies,” Duca said.
Companies like Coinbase can provide information only on the proceeds of sales of crypto and are unable to report tax basis for any given digital asset — typically the purchase price plus acquisition costs — which can then be used to calculate capital gains or losses upon its sale.
“Coinbase actually cannot send the right information, because you can imagine if someone has bitcoin in a cold storage wallet ledger, they send it to Coinbase to sell. Coinbase doesn’t know your acquisition price, what you bought it for. So Coinbase is sending incorrect forms to the IRS. The 1099-DA form reports proceeds, but it doesn’t report tax basis,” Duca said.
Coinbase is well aware of the confusion this will cause. The onus falls on the holder of crypto to “patch” what’s missing in terms of their crypto acquisition costs and actual tax basis via the IRS’s updated Form 8949, Duca said.
Duca acknowledges that crypto tax compliance is extremely low: Under 20% of crypto holders report what they ought to, he said.
“It’s really not been thought out well and is kind of horrible for crypto users. But it’s what they could do the quickest and the easiest,” Duca said. “They just added this super blunt instrument to try to get that 20% up to 80% in a year.”
ECB To Launch Payment Provider Selection For Digital Euro
Three ducks in a row: Abhishek Sharma out for zero vs the Netherlands; yet to score a run in T20 World Cup | Cricket News
iOS 26.4 will bring these 5 upgrades to your iPhone, but there’s still no sign of the new Siri
-
Sports7 days agoBig Tech enters cricket ecosystem as ICC partners Google ahead of T20 WC | T20 World Cup 2026
-
Video2 days agoBitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
-
Tech3 days agoLuxman Enters Its Second Century with the D-100 SACD Player and L-100 Integrated Amplifier
-
Video5 days agoThe Final Warning: XRP Is Entering The Chaos Zone
-
Tech1 day agoThe Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
-
Sports1 day agoGB's semi-final hopes hang by thread after loss to Switzerland
-
Crypto World1 day agoCan XRP Price Successfully Register a 33% Breakout Past $2?
-
Business14 hours agoInfosys Limited (INFY) Discusses Tech Transitions and the Unique Aspects of the AI Era Transcript
-
Video1 day agoFinancial Statement Analysis | Complete Chapter Revision in 10 Minutes | Class 12 Board exam 2026
-
Tech5 hours agoRetro Rover: LT6502 Laptop Packs 8-Bit Power On The Go
-
Crypto World4 days agoBhutan’s Bitcoin sales enter third straight week with $6.7M BTC offload
-
Crypto World7 days agoPippin (PIPPIN) Enters Crypto’s Top 100 Club After Soaring 30% in a Day: More Room for Growth?
-
Video6 days agoPrepare: We Are Entering Phase 3 Of The Investing Cycle
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe strange Cambridgeshire cemetery that forbade church rectors from entering
-
Business6 days agoBarbeques Galore Enters Voluntary Administration
-
Business7 hours agoTesla avoids California suspension after ending ‘autopilot’ marketing
-
Crypto World6 days agoEthereum Price Struggles Below $2,000 Despite Entering Buy Zone
-
NewsBeat3 days agoMan dies after entering floodwater during police pursuit
-
Crypto World5 days agoKalshi enters $9B sports insurance market with new brokerage deal
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUK construction company enters administration, records show