Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Anatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor

Published

on

Anatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor

The June 2026 crypto crash did not have one cause. It had a convergence.

Summary

  • Bitcoin fell from above $80,000 to below $62,000 as four separate pressures converged.
  • A hawkish Fed removed the expected liquidity support before geopolitical tensions accelerated the selloff.
  • Strategy’s 32 BTC sale was small financially but damaged sentiment in an already fragile market.
  • A record 13-day ETF outflow streak removed institutional demand as leveraged positions were liquidated.

Over a brutal stretch from late May into early June, Bitcoin fell from above $80,000 to below $62,000, Ethereum collapsed toward $1,500, roughly $250 billion evaporated from the total crypto market, and well over $1 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated.

But unlike a single-catalyst crash, this one was the product of four distinct forces arriving at once, each amplifying the others: a hawkish Federal Reserve that crushed hopes for rate cuts, fresh US-Iran military strikes that shattered a fragile ceasefire, Michael Saylor’s Strategy breaking a years-long vow by selling Bitcoin, and the longest Bitcoin ETF outflow streak ever recorded.

Advertisement

None of them alone would have produced a crash of this severity. Together, landing in a market already stretched thin on leverage, they produced a cascade.

This piece is the anatomy of that crash: the four forces, how they compounded, and why understanding the convergence matters more than blaming any single trigger.

The setup: a market primed to fall

Before the four forces hit, the market was already fragile, and that fragility is what turned a set of bad headlines into a $250 billion collapse.

Bitcoin had run up to around $82,000 by mid-May, recovering through the spring on an ascending trend that traders had come to rely on. But beneath the rising price, leverage had been accumulating.

Advertisement

The derivatives market filled with crowded long positions, funding rates ran hot as traders paid premiums to bet on further upside, and open interest swelled to levels not seen since the prior cycle’s peak.

This is the condition that makes a market dangerous: a large mass of leveraged long positions stacked at similar price levels, each with a liquidation point waiting below, like dominoes lined up and waiting for the first push.

A market in this state does not need a catastrophe to crash. It needs a trigger big enough to knock over the first domino, after which the leverage does the rest automatically.

Advertisement

The lower a leveraged long’s liquidation price is hit, the more forced selling it generates, which pushes the price down to the next cluster, which triggers more selling, in a self-reinforcing cascade that runs far faster than human reaction.

The market in late May 2026 was a tower of leverage waiting for a reason to topple.

That is the essential context for everything that followed. The four forces that arrived were the triggers, but the leverage was the fuel.

A market with less leverage would have absorbed the same headlines with a routine pullback. A market this stretched amplified them into one of the most violent deleveraging events in recent memory.

Advertisement

Understanding the crash means understanding that the four catalysts did not just push the price down directly; they lit a leverage structure that was primed to explode.

Force one: the Fed crushes rate-cut hopes

The deepest and most structural of the four forces was monetary policy, because it set the hostile backdrop against which everything else played out.

Through early 2026, crypto bulls had counted on Federal Reserve rate cuts to fuel the next leg up, because easy money and low rates push capital toward speculative assets.

Those hopes were systematically crushed. The April FOMC meeting produced an 8-4 vote to hold rates at 3.50% to 3.75%, the most dissents since 1992, signaling deep division but a hawkish majority.

Advertisement

Then a strong U.S. jobs report landed, undercutting the case for imminent cuts because a hot labor market gives the Fed no reason to ease. By early June, markets were pricing roughly a 68.8% probability of zero rate cuts in all of 2026.

The arrival of a new Fed chair added uncertainty, not relief. Kevin Warsh, sworn in on May 22, is the most crypto-literate chair in history, but he is also a monetary hawk, and he had not had time to establish his approach, leaving the market guessing.

His signals of independence from political pressure for cuts dashed hopes that a Trump-appointed chair would ease aggressively. The monetary backdrop therefore went from “cuts are coming” to “no cuts in 2026 and a hawk in charge,” which is precisely the environment that drains liquidity from risk assets like crypto.

This force was structural more than acute. It did not crash the market on a single day, but it removed the foundation the bull case rested on and created the risk-off backdrop in which the other three forces could do maximum damage.

Advertisement

With rate cuts off the table, there was no liquidity tailwind to cushion any shock, and every other negative catalyst hit a market that had lost its expected support.

The Fed did not light the fuse, but it soaked the market in the conditions that made the fire spread.

Force two: Iran shatters the ceasefire

The second force was geopolitical, and it provided the acute risk-off shock that monetary policy had set the stage for.

A fragile US-Iran ceasefire had been holding since April, keeping a lid on Middle East tensions. In early June, it shattered in a rapid sequence.

Advertisement

On June 1, Iran suspended talks with the U.S. over Israel’s actions in Lebanon. Trump publicly contradicted that the same day, claiming talks continued at a rapid pace, injecting confusion.

Then on June 2, Iran fired missiles at Kuwait and Bahrain, and the U.S. retaliated that night with strikes on an Iranian military facility on Qeshm Island.

The ceasefire was over, and the region was back to active military exchange.

The market effect was immediate and followed the classic risk-off pattern. Geopolitical conflict, especially involving a major oil-producing region and a critical shipping chokepoint, drives capital out of risk assets and into perceived safety.

Advertisement

It also pushed oil prices higher, adding an inflationary worry on top of the geopolitical fear. Crypto, sitting at the riskiest end of the asset spectrum, was among the first things sold as investors reduced exposure across the board.

The Iran strikes were the kind of sudden, frightening headline that prompts immediate de-risking.

This force was the acute trigger to the Fed’s structural backdrop. Where the rate-cut disappointment created the hostile environment, the Iran escalation provided the sharp shock that started the selling in earnest.

Advertisement

It was the geopolitical equivalent of the first push on the dominoes, sending the price down toward the leveraged liquidation clusters that were waiting.

Because it coincided with the other forces rather than arriving alone, its risk-off pressure stacked on top of everything else hitting the market in the same window.

Force three: Saylor breaks the vow

The third force was the one that hit sentiment hardest relative to its actual size: Michael Saylor’s Strategy selling Bitcoin for the first time in nearly four years.

On June 1, Strategy disclosed it had sold 32 Bitcoin, breaking a years-long vow never to sell.

Advertisement

In pure market terms, the sale was negligible: 32 coins worth about $2.5 million, a rounding error against the company’s holdings of more than 843,000 Bitcoin and against the tens of billions in daily global Bitcoin volume.

The sale itself moved nothing. But its symbolism moved a great deal.

Strategy and Saylor had become the standard-bearers for never-sell conviction, the most visible institutional believers whose refusal to sell was a load-bearing belief for a certain kind of Bitcoin holder.

When the filing showed Strategy selling, it did not register as a tiny dividend-funding operation, which is what it actually was. It registered as the ultimate diamond hands blinking.

Advertisement

In a fearful, over-leveraged market, that psychological blow was enough to accelerate the selling. Retail traders pointed to the Saylor sale as a primary cause of the crash, which says less about the sale’s real impact than about its outsized effect on sentiment.

This force illustrates the crash’s compounding nature perfectly. The Saylor sale would have been a non-event in a calm, unleveraged market.

But arriving alongside the Fed disappointment, the Iran shock, and the ETF outflows, into a market primed with leverage, it became the sentiment trigger that helped tip the price into the leveraged liquidation zones.

It is the clearest example of how the convergence mattered more than any single force: a $2.5 million sale helping to catalyze a $250 billion crash makes no sense in isolation and perfect sense as one of four blows landing simultaneously on a fragile market.

Advertisement

Force four: the record ETF exodus

The fourth force was the one that turned crypto’s largest source of demand into a source of supply: the longest Bitcoin ETF outflow streak ever recorded.

Since their January 2024 launch, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs had become a major structural source of buying, a steady institutional bid that absorbed supply and supported the price through the 2024-2025 rise.

In the run-up to and through the crash, that bid reversed.

The ETFs recorded 13 consecutive trading days of net outflows from May 15 to June 3, the longest streak since launch, draining roughly $4.4 billion and flipping the year’s cumulative flows negative for the first time.

Advertisement

BlackRock’s IBIT alone shed around $3.3 billion. The single worst week saw $3.4 billion leave, the largest weekly outflow on record.

The significance is structural. ETF flows had become a dominant driver of Bitcoin’s price, by some estimates accounting for a large share of weekly price moves.

When the ETFs are buying, they cushion dips and amplify rallies. When they are selling, as during this streak, they remove the buyer that might otherwise have stabilized the market and become a source of supply that drags the price down.

At the exact moment the other three forces were pushing the price down, the ETF complex was not there to absorb the selling. The marginal institutional bid had turned into a marginal offer.

Advertisement

This force was both a cause and a symptom, which is what made it so damaging.

The outflows were partly driven by the same macro forces, the Fed and the risk-off shift, that were driving everything else, so they reflected the broader negativity.

But they also actively deepened the crash by removing demand and adding supply, creating a feedback loop: macro fear drove ETF outflows, which drove the price down, which deepened the fear.

With the ETF bid gone, the leverage cascade triggered by the other forces had nothing to absorb it, and the price fell through support level after support level.

Advertisement

Why the convergence is the real story

The lasting lesson of the June crash is that it was a convergence, not a trigger, and that distinction matters for understanding both this crash and how to read the next one.

The instinct after any crash is to find the single cause, and different observers picked different villains: the Saylor sale, the Iran strikes, the Fed, or the ETF outflows.

But the honest reading is that no single one of these would have produced a crash of this magnitude.

The Saylor sale was tiny. The Iran shock, in a healthy market, might have caused a modest dip. The Fed disappointment was structural background. The ETF outflows were serious but represented a fraction of lifetime inflows.

Advertisement

What made June a $250 billion crash was that all four arrived in the same narrow window, into a market primed with leverage, so that each amplified the others.

The Fed removed the support, Iran provided the shock, Saylor broke the sentiment, the ETFs removed the bid, and the leverage turned the combination into a cascade.

This is why the convergence framing is more useful than the blame framing.

If you believe the crash was caused by the Saylor sale, you would expect it to reverse once Strategy stopped selling, which misreads the situation entirely.

Advertisement

If you understand it as a convergence, you know that recovery depends on the underlying forces: whether the Fed pivots, whether the Iran tensions ease, whether the ETF flows turn positive, and whether the leverage has been fully flushed.

The crash was systemic in the sense that it emerged from the interaction of multiple forces, not from one cause that can be isolated and fixed.

The practical takeaway is to watch the four forces rather than hunt for a single explanation, because the same convergence logic governs the recovery.

The leverage cascade has likely flushed much of the excess, which is mechanically a reset. But the macro forces, the Fed’s rate path, the Iran situation, and the ETF flow direction, remain the variables that determine whether June was a capitulation bottom or a waypoint to lower levels.

Advertisement

The June 2026 crash was the anatomy of a convergence: four forces, one fragile leveraged market, and a cascade that none of them would have produced alone.

Understanding it that way is the difference between blaming a villain and reading the market, and only the second one helps you understand what comes next.

This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. The figures and analysis described reflect data available as of June 2026. Always do your own research and consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH BTC Ratio Has Yet to Reverse This Cycle?

Published

on

Ethereum price is recovering from a bloodbath last week while the ETH BTC ratio is off its most depressed prediction since the Covid era.

Ethereum price prediction is pressing hard against a wall. ETH is trading at $1,650, recovering from a brutal bloodbath last week. Meanwhile, the ETH BTC ratio is off its most depressed levels since the Covid era.

After falling from the 2nd-largest crypto by market cap last week, ETH is finally back at the top of the USDT stablecoin market cap. The setup is a bullish consolidation pressing into a resistance of $1,700.

Ethereum price is recovering from a bloodbath last week while the ETH BTC ratio is off its most depressed prediction since the Covid era.
ETH BTC Ratio, Weekly, TradingView

For now, the ETH BTC ratio has slipped toward 0.026, where it was last seen during the Covid crash. This has also shown how thoroughly Bitcoin has dominated institutional flows this cycle. Can Ethereum price finally recapture its relative strength, and the bearish prediction?

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Ethereum Price Prediction: Is $5,000 Still A Realistic Target?

Advertisement

The technical structure is arguably the most constructive ETH has shown in months. Price is holding above the $1,500 psychological floor, even with analysts calling for a sub $1,000 level.

Volume at $15 billion adds credibility to the move. With ETH holding above $1,600 now, it could as well target $2,000.

Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

If ETH can close convincingly above $1,700 on sustained volume. The next targets are $1,800, then $2,000. Or more consolidation between $1,500 – $1,600 for several sessions before a directional resolution. Ratio pressure from BTC persists but does not deepen materially.

However, a daily close below $1,500 reopens the path to $1,200 support. The ETH/BTC ratio could retest or extend below 0.0265.

Advertisement

The ETH/BTC ratio is the uncomfortable variable. Even a dollar-denominated ETH breakout may not signal genuine Ethereum outperformance if Bitcoin’s macro momentum continues absorbing institutional rotation.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early-Mover Upside as Ethereum Tests Key Levels

ETH at its current price is exciting, but it also means anyone buying here is doing so at a make-or-break point. That tension is real, and the risk balloons. The upside from $1,600 to $1,800 is just 16%. Worthwhile, but late-cycle positioning at proven resistance carries execution risk that early-stage assets simply don’t carry in the same way.

Advertisement

That’s where Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) draws attention from traders already watching the BTC/ETH narrative. It’s the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, designed to deliver faster performance than Solana while inheriting Bitcoin’s security and trust.

The project addresses Bitcoin’s core constraints directly: slow transactions, high fees, and the absence of programmable smart contracts.

The presale has raised $32 million at a current token price of $0.0136. Staking is live with a high 36% APY, and the architecture includes a Decentralized Canonical Bridge for native BTC transfers alongside extremely low-latency transaction execution.

Early interest has been substantial, reflecting genuine demand for Bitcoin infrastructure plays as the ecosystem matures.

Advertisement

Research Bitcoin Hyper before the presale price moves.

The post Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH BTC Ratio Has Yet to Reverse This Cycle? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP price could plunge to $0.90 before bottoming out, analyst says

Published

on

XRP price has formed a descending parallel channel pattern on the weekly chart.

XRP price has stabilized near $1.14 after a sharp weekly selloff, but analyst warnings and weak technical structure suggest the token could still revisit $0.90 before forming a durable bottom.

Summary

  • Analyst Ali Martinez says XRP could fall to $0.90 before finding a bottom.
  • Bearish chart patterns and liquidation clusters keep downside risks in focus.
  • XRPL attracted $1.5 billion in RWA inflows, supporting long-term fundamentals.

According to data from crypto.news, XRP (XRP) price traded near $1.14 on June 8 after plunging from around $1.45 at the start of the month and briefly testing support near $1.10 during the recent market-wide selloff.

XRP token has spent the past two sessions consolidating between roughly $1.10 and $1.15 as traders assessed the impact of macroeconomic headwinds, rising geopolitical tensions, and a liquidation-driven decline that pushed several momentum indicators into oversold territory.

Advertisement

XRP price stabilized despite crypto market sentiment remaining fragile following Bitcoin’s (BTC) drop toward the $60,000 area, persistent spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, and a stronger U.S. dollar after hotter-than-expected labor market data reduced expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts.

XRP faces pressure from macro shocks and oil-led inflation risks

Risk appetite weakened further after WTI crude futures jumped more than 4% above $94 per barrel on June 8. The move followed renewed missile exchanges between Iran and Israel, which threatened President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure a proposed 60-day ceasefire with Tehran.

Higher oil prices added another problem for crypto traders because energy-driven inflation could make it harder for the Fed to ease policy.

Advertisement

Rising Treasury yields and a stronger dollar usually weigh on non-yielding assets, leaving altcoins such as XRP exposed during periods of forced deleveraging.

Bitcoin’s brief recovery toward the $62,000 to $63,000 range has helped slow the selloff, but the Crypto Fear and Greed Index remains in Extreme Fear territory. XRP’s current consolidation therefore looks more like a pause after heavy selling than a confirmed trend reversal.

XRP chart keeps $0.90 in focus as liquidation clusters build

On the weekly chart, XRP continues to trade inside a descending parallel channel that has capped price action since its 2025 peak near $3.80. The latest candle is sitting near the lower half of that structure, with immediate support around $1.13 and deeper horizontal support near $0.90.

XRP price has formed a descending parallel channel pattern on the weekly chart.
XRP price has formed a descending parallel channel pattern on the weekly chart — June 8 | Source: crypto.news

According to crypto analyst Ali Martinez, the $0.90 region remains a key level for long-term buyers.

Momentum data supports the bearish setup. The weekly MACD remains below the zero line, with the signal line still above the MACD line, while the Aroon indicator shows Aroon Down near 92.86% and Aroon Up around 14.29%. That structure shows sellers continue to control the larger trend.

Advertisement

The 3-day XRP liquidation heatmap shows heavy leverage concentrated below spot price between $1.08 and $1.05, with another strong liquidity pocket near $1.04. A sweep of those levels could trigger another wave of forced selling before the market attempts a stronger rebound.

XRP liquidation heatmap 3-day chart.
XRP liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass

Upside liquidity is clustered around $1.17 to $1.20, meaning a short squeeze is still possible if XRP breaks above the current range. However, the token would need to reclaim $1.31 and then $1.50 to weaken the descending channel structure.

Fundamentals offer one counterweight to the bearish chart. As crypto.news reported earlier, XRP Ledger recorded around $1.5 billion in real-world asset inflows over the last 30 days, while Ethereum saw roughly $1.2 billion in outflows. XRPL’s RWA market cap also rose more than 124% in the first quarter, with tokenized assets reaching about $2.25 billion.

Ripple’s RLUSD expansion through Wormhole has also improved liquidity options across multiple networks. The stablecoin push adds to Ripple’s focus on tokenized securities, funds, and institutional assets, giving XRP a stronger fundamental story than many altcoins facing similar macro pressure.

Still, price action remains the near-term driver. A weekly close below $1.10 could expose $1.05 first, followed by the $0.90 zone highlighted by Martinez.

Advertisement

A recovery above $1.20 would ease immediate downside pressure, but XRP may need a break above $1.50 before traders can argue that the larger downtrend has started to fail.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

U.S. PCI report, ECB interest-rate decision: Crypto Week Ahead: Crypto Week Ahead

Published

on

U.S. PCI report, ECB interest-rate decision: Crypto Week Ahead: Crypto Week Ahead

The second week of June puts the crypto market’s resilience to the test as digital assets battle an unusual divergence from record-setting equity markets.

Following a grueling nine-month correction cycle that has pushed bitcoin down to major psychological support levels, traders enter the week facing a double-barreled threat of heavy token emissions and tightening cross-asset liquidity.

The direction of the week’s risk appetite could be dictated by a high-stakes macro calendar. Traditional markets are bracing for Wednesday’s U.S. CPI print, and a hot inflation reading could lock in a restrictive Federal Reserve stance and deepen recent spot ETF outflows.

With the market trying to find a definitive bottom amid persistent geopolitical friction and shifting risk capital, the week’s data will determine whether the asset class faces further downside or maps out a structural recovery.

Advertisement

What to Watch

(All times ET)

  • Crypto
    • June 8: Coinbase debuts its perpetual-style equity index futures, expanding its derivatives offerings beyond crypto assets.
    • June 8: Starknet introduces a new STRK20 privacy standard on its mainnet, adding native privacy-preserving features and shielding mechanics to the Ethereum layer-2 network.
    • June 8-12: The Clarity Act continues its legislative progress on the full Senate floor. The market-structure bill faces debate over DeFi obligations and stablecoin yield exemptions.
  • Macro
    • June 9, 9:30 p.m.: China Inflation Rate YoY for May est. 1.3% (Prev. 1.2%); PPI YoY est. 3.8% (Prev. 2.8%)
    • June 10, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. Inflation Rate YoY for May est. 4.2% (Prev. 3.8%); Core Inflation Rate YoY est. 2.9% (Prev. 2.8%)
    • June 10, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. Inflation Rate MoM for May est. 0.5% (Prev. 0.6%); Core Inflation MoM est. 0.3% (Prev. 0.4%)
    • June 11, 4:15 a.m.: ECB Interest-Rate Decision est. 2.25% (Prev. 2.00%)
    • June 11, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. PPI MoM for May est. 0.8% (Prev. 1.4%); Core PPI MoM est. 0.4% (Prev. 0.7%)
    • June 11, 8:30 a.m.: U.S. Initial Jobless Claims for period ending June 6 est. 218K (Prev. 215K)
    • June 12, 2 a.m.: U.K. GDP MoM for April est. -0.1% (Prev. 0.3%); GDP YoY est. 1.1% (Prev. 1.2%)
  • Earnings

Token Events

  • Governance Votes & Calls
    • Aave is conducting a temperature check seeking community feedback on deploying Aave V4 on Arc alongside supporting an initial set of high-quality assets. Voting ends on June 9.
    • Bancor (BNT) is voting on a proposed lower fee on numerous stablecoin pairings, including USDS, UDSe and PYUSD. Voting closes on June 10.
    • Decentraland DAO is voting on lowering the voting power threshold for governance proposals from 6 million to 5 million or less, aiming to address declining voter participation. Voting ends on June 12.
  • Unlocks
    • June 9: HumidiFi (WET) to unlock 111.59% of its circulating supply worth $14.33 million.
    • June 10: HOME (HOME) to unlock 19.79% of its circulating supply worth $25.68 million.
    • June 10: Magic Eden (ME) to 33.99% of its circulating supply worth $10.08 million.
    • June 6: Hyperliquid (HYPE) to unlock 2.54% of its circulating supply worth $673 million.
  • Token Launches
    • June 8: Pharos (PROS) listed on Bitrue at 2 a.m.

Conferences

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Galaxy cuts CLARITY Act odds as Senate clock runs out

Published

on

Santiment flags Bitcoin euphoria after CLARITY win

Galaxy Digital has lowered its estimate for the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026, warning that the Senate is running out of time to pass the crypto market structure bill.

Summary

  • Galaxy cut CLARITY Act odds to 60% as Senate floor time becomes harder to secure.
  • Alex Thorn said July action is needed before the August recess closes the window.
  • JPMorgan and Bitwise also flagged lower odds as ethics and finance talks remain unresolved.

Alex Thorn, Galaxy’s head of research, said the firm now sees a 60% chance of passage this year. Galaxy had raised its estimate to 75% in May after the Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill.

Galaxy lowers CLARITY Act odds to 60%

“On May 22, we raised our estimate of the probability that the CLARITY Act becomes law in 2026 to 75%,” Thorn said. “We are now lowering that estimate to 60%,” he added.

The change shows how quickly the bill’s path has narrowed. Thorn said Senate leaders must move the bill before lawmakers leave for their August recess in late July.

He said the window “effectively closes” after that break because midterm election activity will make major legislation harder to pass.

Advertisement

Senate calendar becomes the main risk

The CLARITY Act still needs Senate floor debate, an amendment process, and alignment between different Senate committee texts.

Thorn said Senate Majority Leader John Thune would likely need to schedule floor time in July for the process to fit before recess.

“Anything later and the procedural steps do not fit before the recess,” Thorn said.

The bill also needs at least 60 Senate votes to avoid a long debate process. That means lawmakers must settle remaining disputes while keeping enough bipartisan support.

Ethics and illicit finance talks remain open

Galaxy said it would raise its odds again if Senate leaders commit to a July vote and lawmakers settle the remaining policy issues.

Advertisement

Thorn said ethics and illicit finance provisions remain key sticking points. These issues matter because they could affect support from senators who remain cautious about crypto rules.

Senator Cynthia Lummis has continued pressing for a floor vote. She wrote that the bill had cleared committee and that “the floor is next.”

Lummis also told CNBC that lawmakers are working through ethics and illicit finance concerns before a possible vote.

Advertisement

As previously reported by crypto.news, Galaxy had raised its CLARITY Act odds to 75% after the Senate Banking Committee passed the bill in a 15-9 bipartisan vote.

Separate crypto.news reporting noted that JPMorgan later warned the bill was running out of time. The bank placed the chance of passage this year at less than 50%.

Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan also sounded more cautious. He said some Washington insiders put the odds between 5% and 30%.

The CLARITY Act remains one of the crypto industry’s main policy goals. Its path now depends on whether Senate leaders can find floor time, settle the open provisions, and send a revised bill back to the House before the election calendar takes over.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Iran Envoy Says Iran and Oman Will Set New Hormuz Conditions

Published

on

Iran Envoy Says Iran and Oman Will Set New Hormuz Conditions

Iran’s ambassador to Moscow said the Strait of Hormuz will be open, but under new conditions.

The envoy mentioned Iranian and Omani authorities will determine conditions, which will include transit fees. 

Iran to Monetize Hormuz as Oil Flows Stay Choked

Kazem Jalali made the remarks to the Russian newspaper Izvestia on Monday. His comments signal Tehran’s intent to monetize its grip over the waterway. 

Jalali said Iran and Oman provide services tied to the strait and would charge for them. He did not detail how the fees would be structured.

Advertisement

“Of course, this strait will ⁠be open, but with new conditions to be determined by ​the Iranian and Omani authorities,” he said. “We understand that Iran and Oman provide certain services related to this strait. And fees will be charged for those services.”

However, the plan faces firm resistance from Washington. The US warned Oman in late May not to join the effort. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Oman’s ambassador denied any such plans.

Meanwhile, this is not the first time Tehran has tied the Hormuz passage to payment. In April, Iran said it would charge oil tankers transit tolls in cryptocurrency.

Hamid Hosseini, spokesperson for Iran’s Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters’ Union, named Bitcoin (BTC) as a payment method.

Hormuz Closure Squeezes Energy Markets

The US-Israeli war on Iran began on February 28 and has largely choked oil flows through the strait. Before the conflict, the waterway carried about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne oil and a similar share of liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Advertisement

That disruption has kept energy prices high. Brent crude traded near $97 a barrel on Monday after Israel struck Lebanon and explosions hit Iranian cities. Moreover, oil and LNG flows remain severely constrained.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The standoff is rippling through global trade. Spot rates for a 40-foot container from Asia to the US West Coast rose 20% in a week. According to The Kobeissi Letter, the price hit $3,933, the highest in months, while charges to Northern Europe jumped 27% to $3,649.

Advertisement

“Since the start of the Iran War, Asia-to-US container rates have surged +109%, and Asia-to-Europe rates are up by more than +50%,” the post read.

Analysts expect more pressure as importers restock inventories in July and August. 

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Iran Envoy Says Iran and Oman Will Set New Hormuz Conditions appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Don’t Trust Bitcoin’s Bounce Now, Analyst Warns Capitulation Is Still Ahead

Published

on

Bitcoin’s price rebound since the Friday massacre to $59,000 drove the asset north to $64,000 earlier this morning, perhaps driven by some positive developments on the US-Iran war front.

One analyst, though, believes this price recovery is not the full story and warned about another major retracement.

BTC Jumps to $64K

The primary cryptocurrency plunged below $60,000 on Friday for the first time since before the US presidential elections in November 2024. This new local low was the culmination of a weeks-long correction that began in mid-May when the asset was rejected at $82,000.

It managed to rebound to just over $60,000 relatively quickly and bounced to $62,000 over the weekend. It experienced some volatility yesterday evening when Iran struck Israel in retaliation for attacks against Lebanon. However, US President Donald Trump condemned all the strikes and said that his country and Iran might be closer to a peace deal that could be announced in the following few days.

Advertisement

BTC jumped to $64,200 in a promising wick, but was quickly stopped and now sits at around $63,000. Most altcoins followed the fluctuations, leading to another uptick in the liquidations from the futures field. The total value of wrecked positions has risen to well past $600 million daily, shows CoinGlass data. This time, though, short liquidations dominate with $467 million.

Liquidation Data on CoinGlass
Liquidation Data on CoinGlass

Don’t Trust The Pump

Popular analyst Merlijn The Trader predicted BTC’s bounce following the $59,000 low, but cautioned that this is not the full story. He based his analysis on the 2022 bear market, when the cryptocurrency had already retraced hard but then rebounded in a similar manner. However, the actual capitulation was still in play and followed after some investors had already hopped on.

If history repeats now, Merlijn predicted a price surge toward $65,000-$70,000 before the ultimate leg down drives the asset to a proper DCA zone between $48,000 and $59,000.

The post Don’t Trust Bitcoin’s Bounce Now, Analyst Warns Capitulation Is Still Ahead appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Zcash bounces about 45% as developers propose Ironwood upgrade

Published

on

Zcash bounces about 45% as developers propose Ironwood upgrade

Zcash has clawed back much of last week’s losses, rising about 45% from the low near $300 it hit Friday as developers proposed a fix for the flaw that triggered the sell-off.

ZEC traded around $437 on Monday, according to CoinDesk data, though it remains down roughly 22% over the week. The token plunged after Shielded Labs, a nonprofit developer on the network, disclosed a counterfeiting bug in Zcash’s Orchard pool, the part of the system that hides transaction details.

The flaw, undetected since 2022, could have let an attacker create unlimited fake ZEC without anyone noticing and withdraw tokens from the protocol’s shielded pool – which offers opt-in priv

Developers, including Shielded Labs, the Zcash Foundation, and the Zcash Open Development Lab, patched the bug within days through emergency network upgrades, coordinated with the mining pools ViaBTC and Foundry. On June 6, the same groups proposed Ironwood, a plan to restore users’ ability to confirm the coin’s supply is sound.

Advertisement

Ironwood would create a new privacy pool using the repaired code and block the creation of new coins in the old Orchard pool. Once it activates, anyone running the Zcash software could add up the balances across pools and confirm that no more than the correct amount of ZEC exists.

Users would not have to trust the developers’ word or wait for funds to migrate.

The plan could also reveal whether the bug was ever abused. As users move coins out of the old pool, any counterfeit ZEC would either be exposed when it tried to leave or be stranded and destroyed. Shielded Labs has said it believes exploitation was unlikely.

The proposal has drawn attention beyond the Zcash community. In his latest newsletter, investor Chamath Palihapitiya described Ironwood as a way for anyone running a node to tally the balances across pools and “verify the supply is clean.”

Advertisement

Developers have not given a firm timeline for the upgrade, saying the work to build, test and coordinate it across the network could take longer than expected.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum OG sells $188M before crash, then buys back lower

Published

on

Wadoozie Ethereum token launches today via Uniswap

An early Ethereum holder sold about $188 million in ETH, wrapped staked Ether and wrapped Bitcoin before the latest market crash, then rebuilt the positions at lower prices. 

Summary

  • An Ethereum OG sold $188 million before the crash and rebuilt positions at lower prices.
  • Ethereum rebounded near $1,666, but a profitable whale kept a 60,000 ETH short position open.
  • Exchange reserves fell by 475,000 ETH as traders watched sell walls near the recovery path.

On-chain tracker Lookonchain linked the activity to three wallets and described the timing as a “perfect sell high, buy low.”

The transactions arrived as Ethereum recovered from a brief fall toward $1,500. ETH traded near $1,674 at the time of writing, up almost 4% over 24 hours. 

Advertisement

However, the token remained down sharply over seven days, and another profitable trader kept a large short position open. Its 24-hour range stretched from $1,607 to $1,706, showing that volatility remained elevated during the first stage of the recovery.

Ethereum OG exits $188M position before the crash

Lookonchain said the whale sold 60,000 ETH worth $117.25 million and 9,442 wstETH worth $24 million. The combined Ethereum-linked assets changed hands at an average price near $2,040. The trader also sold 600 WBTC worth $47.12 million at an average price of $78,538.

Those sales totaled about $188.37 million based on the values reported by Lookonchain. The tracker did not identify the wallet owner. It also did not confirm whether the trader expected the crash or reduced exposure for another reason. The timing remains visible on-chain, but the motive is unknown.

After the decline, the same trader bought 611 WBTC for about $38.68 million at an average price of $63,280. The wallet also acquired 60,088 ETH worth $95.3 million and 10,000 wstETH worth $21.08 million. Lookonchain placed the average purchase price for the Ethereum-linked assets near $1,606.

Advertisement

The new purchases increased the trader’s WBTC holdings by 11 tokens compared with the earlier sale. The wallet also rebuilt slightly more ETH and wstETH than it had sold. The reported values show that the trader regained similar exposure while using less capital because market prices had fallen.

Ethereum rebound faces whale short and Coinbase sell walls

The broader market has started to recover, but not every large trader has turned bullish. Lookonchain said pension-usdt.eth added another 10,000 ETH to a short position. That brought the total short to 60,000 ETH, worth about $101 million. The account had recorded 22 winning trades and more than $45 million in total profit, according to the tracker.

Other analysts reported mixed signals. Ali Martinez said the TD Sequential indicator had produced a buy signal for Ethereum. Analyst CW said Coinbase whales were placing short-term sell walls above the price. He argued that ETH could continue toward $2,000 if buyers clear that supply, but the claim remains a conditional market view rather than a confirmed outcome.

Falling exchange reserves support a tighter ETH market

CryptoQuant contributor Amr Taha reported that tracked Ethereum reserves across Binance, OKX, Gemini and Bitfinex fell by about 475,000 ETH in early June. Binance’s balance dropped by roughly 190,000 ETH, while Bitfinex lost another 180,000 ETH from its tracked reserves. OKX recorded the largest percentage decline.

Advertisement

Lower exchange reserves can reduce the amount of ETH readily available for sale, but withdrawals do not prove that holders plan to keep the assets long term. Coins can move to private custody, staking services or other trading venues. The reserve change therefore offers a supply signal, not a guaranteed price direction.

As previously reported by crypto.news, Ethereum briefly touched $1,500 during the June selloff after losing the $1,800 and $1,700 areas. Leveraged liquidations, weak ETF demand and broader risk aversion added pressure. The move left $1,500 as the nearest major support zone.

Ethereum now faces resistance between the recent daily high near $1,706 and the former support zones above $1,800. A break above those levels could place $2,000 back in focus. Failure to hold the recovery would return attention to $1,600 and $1,500, while the large whale short shows that bearish positioning has not disappeared.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP News: David Schwartz Just Said XRP Is Becoming a Settlement Layer for Stocks and Loans, Is the Infrastructure Actually Ready?

Published

on

xrp logo

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz used a June 5 video segment to lay out what the XRP Ledger is becoming: a settlement and issuance layer for tokenized stocks, money market funds, repos, and on-chain loans, not just a faster payments rail. This is bullish news for XRP.

The roadmap is specific, the infrastructure timeline is tight, and the institutional partner list is real. The question worth asking is which parts of this are already running and which are still in the queue.

Xrp (XRP)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

What’s Actually Live on XRPL Right Now: The RWA Base Is Real, But the Headline Products Are Still Incoming

Advertisement

The traction on XRPL’s real-world asset layer is not a projection, it’s a data point. Tokenized RWAs on the ledger grew from $24.7 million to $567.9 million over the course of 2025, a 2,200% increase, and reached approximately $2.325 billion by early 2026.

That trajectory puts XRPL roughly 8th globally for distributed tokenized RWAs, representing around 1.53% of the total market.

Source: RWA.XYZ

The top issuers are VERT Capital, RLUSD, and OpenEden, which together accounted for 85.5% of tokenized value as of mid-2025. Ripple’s regulated stablecoin RLUSD carries a $1.3 billion market cap, making it the third-largest US-regulated stablecoin.

That is the live stack. The $2.3 billion figure is real. What it means for XRPL’s ambitions in tokenized equities and credit is a different question.

On the protocol side, two mechanisms are central to Schwartz’s vision. The Multi-Purpose Token standard, MPT, allows complex structured assets like bonds and funds to be represented on-chain with built-in attributes such as maturity dates and transfer restrictions, without requiring custom smart-contract logic.

Advertisement

The native lending protocol, being rolled out under XLS-66 as part of XRPL Version 3.0.0, enables fixed-term institutional loans with isolated vaults and automated repayments. A permissioned DEX, order books accessible only to KYC-credentialed participants – already has its first live offering. These are not concepts.

They are shipping infrastructure. The XLS-66 validator vote, which requires an 80% supermajority, is the remaining gate on full lending protocol activation.

What XRP Schwartz Said on June 5 and What the News Sequencing Actually Signals

Schwartz’s framing in the ‘XRP in a Minute’ segment was deliberate in its sequencing. He opened by tracing Bitcoin’s contribution, proving that a public blockchain could let people hold and transfer value, and then positioned XRPL as the next layer: ‘providing both the native digital assets similar to bitcoin, as well as issued assets that can represent things like stablecoins or tokenized assets of any kind.’

Advertisement

He then named the near-term product categories explicitly: ‘tokenized securities to money market funds, even things like tokenized stocks.’ And on the credit side: ‘tokenized repos and tokenized loans.’ The ordering matters.

Securities and funds first, those have the clearest institutional demand and the most developed compliance infrastructure on XRPL already. Repos and loans follow, which require the XLS-66 lending protocol to be fully live.

Tokenized stocks are named but are not yet confirmed as live products on the ledger as of the article date. Archax, the UK-regulated digital securities exchange, has committed a $1 billion pipeline including equities and fund units.

The infrastructure, MPT, permissioned DEX, credential-gated order books, is capable of supporting tokenized equities. The actual live products are not yet announced.

Advertisement

Schwartz’s institutional thesis is pointed: ‘Enterprises will provide the features that will attract mass retail adoption, where DeFi can truly deliver on its promise of replacing TradFi.’

That is an argument that compliance-first, enterprise-built financial products are the on-ramp for the next wave of tokenization adoption, not permissionless protocols or retail speculation.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

The post XRP News: David Schwartz Just Said XRP Is Becoming a Settlement Layer for Stocks and Loans, Is the Infrastructure Actually Ready? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CME is letting traders bet on bitcoin volatility, not price, and two firms have already placed bets

Published

on

Bitcoin's price discovery is moving to Chicago

CME’s bitcoin volatility index futures began trading last week, offering investors a new way to trade and hedge price volatility. DV Chain and Monarq Asset Management executed the first block trades, kicking off trading in the contracts.

These volatility contracts track the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index (BVX), which represents the market’s expectations for bitcoin volatility over four weeks. Their debut allows traders to take positions directly on expected price turbulence rather than just price direction.

That distinction matters because most derivatives, including futures, perpetual futures and options, require a view on where price is going. Volatility futures eliminate that complexity, letting traders express a view purely on how BTC will move in either direction.

That opens the door to a new set of hedging and portfolio strategies that were previously difficult to execute on regulated venues. Think of positioning for how much bitcoin might move around events like this week’s U.S. inflation data – traders can go long or short volatility depending on their outlook.

Advertisement

Shiliang Tang, CEO of Monarq, called the launch a positive step in broadening regulated volatility offerings.

“As bitcoin continues to mature into a more mainstream institutional asset class, the demand for sophisticated risk management instruments grows alongside it. Robust tools like CME Group Bitcoin Volatility futures are exactly what investors need to accurately express their market viewpoints and efficiently hedge their portfolios within a secure, transparent framework,” he said in the press announcement.

Monarq Asset Management is a institutional-focused quantitative and systematic digital asset investment firm managed by former executives from firms such as LedgerPrime, Tower Research, and BlockTower Capital. DV Chain is a liquidity and market-making service provider.

The launch of volatility futures expands CME’s existing product suite comprising bitcoin and ether standard and micro futures and options contracts. The platform’s crypto derivatives business has reached roughly 266,900 contracts year-to-date, up 38% year-on-year, while average daily open interest stands at roughly 274,500 contracts, up 18%.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025