Crypto World
Avalanche price holds near $9.70 as U.S. ‘digital commodity’ ruling meets subnet growth
Avalanche price is grinding around $9.70 as a U.S. “digital commodity” label, fee and subnet upgrades, and growing RWA and ETF activity push fundamentals ahead of AVAX’s stalled chart.
Summary
- Avalanche trades around $9.67 with a market cap near $3.8 billion and 24-hour volume above $220 million.
- AVAX is consolidating roughly 10–12% below key $10 resistance after a March ruling that classified it as a U.S. “digital commodity” and a series of scaling upgrades.
- Subnet expansion and rising real‑world asset activity contrast with subdued price action, mirroring a broader pause across large L1 tokens.
Avalanche (AVAX), the native token of the Avalanche Layer‑1 smart contract network, is trading at about $9.67 today, with 24-hour spot volume around $226.7 million and a market capitalization close to $3.88 billion. Yahoo Finance data show AVAX closing at $9.6793 on March 26, 2026, after opening near $9.67, continuing a tight range that has persisted for several sessions. CoinGecko lists daily trading volume near $1.01 billion when aggregating spot and derivatives, representing a 61.30% increase from the previous day, suggesting renewed activity even as price remains rangebound.
Price history from CoinMarketCap places Avalanche’s recent closes between $9.17 and $9.75 over the first week of March, with March 6 seeing an open at $9.3838 and close at $9.4534, underscoring how the token has spent much of the month pivoting around the $9–$10 zone. Investing.com’s historical series similarly shows AVAX closing at $8.99 on March 22 after trading between $8.93 and $9.34 that day, with 5.19 million AVAX changing hands. Put together, the tape shows a large‑cap L1 in consolidation rather than in a trending phase.
Beyond the chart, Avalanche has logged a string of structural developments in March. Phemex notes that Avalanche was formally described as a “digital commodity” by the U.S. SEC and CFTC on March 17, 2026, a designation that clarifies its status alongside assets like Bitcoin in certain regulatory contexts. In parallel, CoinMarketCap’s latest Avalanche update highlights a recent upgrade that implemented three proposals: ACP‑226, allowing validators to dynamically adjust minimum block times; ACP‑204, adding support for the secp256r1 cryptographic curve used in Apple’s FaceID and TouchID; and ACP‑181, which stabilizes the validator set for short periods to reduce gas costs and improve cross‑chain reliability. CoinMarketCap’s analysis notes that these changes are intended to make Avalanche faster, cheaper and more secure, particularly for mobile users and cross‑chain applications.
These improvements build on the earlier “Octane” hard fork in May 2025, which reduced subnet deployment costs by approximately 83%, cut the minimum base fee by 99.6% and introduced dynamic fee algorithms to prevent spam in periods of high demand. Together, the upgrades frame Avalanche as a high‑throughput L1 with a scaling strategy centered on subnets—custom, application‑specific blockchains that require AVAX for staking and fees.
Avalanche’s longer‑term growth thesis is increasingly tied to subnets and real‑world asset (RWA) tokenization. Yahoo Finance previously reported that the Avalanche Foundation committed 4 million AVAX—valued at around $290 million at the time—to attract gaming, DeFi and NFT projects to its subnet ecosystem, via the “Multiverse” incentive program. CoinMarketCap’s Avalanche updates also reference the Evergreen Subnet initiative for institutions and RWA partners such as BlackRock and Securitize, which are working on on‑chain products that would settle on Avalanche infrastructure. Binance’s recent deep dive points to more than 75 active subnets, a $40 million Retro9000 rewards program, and the launch of a Nasdaq‑listed AVAX treasury firm and spot AVAX ETF as signs of growing institutional involvement.
Despite these developments, WazirX’s March 2026 outlook characterizes AVAX as technically weak but fundamentally supported, identifying $10 as a key support‑turned‑resistance level and outlining a medium‑term consolidation band between $9 and $11. Within the broader L1 landscape, Avalanche’s sideways trading near $9.70 stands in contrast to the more explosive moves seen in smaller altcoins, but resembles a common pattern among major smart‑contract platforms where on‑chain fundamentals improve ahead of price. For real‑time data, readers can track AVAX on the crypto.news market‑cap dashboard via the Avalanche price page, and compare it against other large L1 tokens such as Ethereum and Solana on their respective price pages.
XDC price is consolidating just above $0.03 as tokenized debt deals, trade-finance pilots and an Ethereum-aligned upgrade deepen its role in enterprise RWA infrastructure.
Summary
- XDC Network is trading around $0.032 per token, with a market cap near $640 million and 24-hour volume in the mid-teens of millions.
- Price has inched higher by roughly 2–3% over the last day, but remains down on the week, reflecting a slow grind after a broader altcoin pullback.
- Recent upgrades, tokenized debt deals and trade-finance pilots signal growing real-world asset usage even as speculative flows stay modest compared with higher-beta altcoins.
XDC Network (XDC), a hybrid Layer-1 focused on enterprise and trade-finance applications, is currently changing hands at about $0.032 per coin, according to both Binance and third-party price aggregators. Binance lists the live XDC price at $0.03206, with a market capitalization of roughly $639.15 million and 24-hour trading volume of $16.29 million, based on a circulating supply of 19.94 billion XDC. A parallel snapshot from 3Commas shows XDC at $0.03214, a 2.8% gain over the last 24 hours, on a $14.73 million trading volume and market cap of $640.9 million.
Historical data from Yahoo Finance place XDC’s recent trading range between $0.0304 and $0.0324 over the past several sessions, underscoring how the token has been consolidating just above $0.03 after earlier weakness in March. CoinMarketCap’s price-history table likewise records daily closes clustered in the $0.031–$0.034 band throughout early March 2026, with no single breakout day but a sequence of tight ranges. That pattern contrasts with the sharp spikes seen in high-volatility memecoins, and instead reflects more measured spot flows into and out of a large-cap infrastructure asset.
Under the hood, XDC Network markets itself as an EVM-compatible, enterprise-grade blockchain for real-world asset tokenization, cross-border payments and trade-finance settlement, placing XDC in the RWA and L1 categories rather than pure DeFi or meme segments. CoinGecko reports a circulating supply of 16 billion XDC in another widely used dataset, with a fully diluted valuation of roughly $3.49 billion assuming a maximum supply of 38 billion tokens. That configuration gives XDC one of the larger RWA/L1 market caps, even if daily volume remains below the most aggressively traded smart-contract platforms.
February’s XDC Network update outlined several major developments that help explain why institutions are watching the chain even as price moves remain subdued. The network completed its v2.6.8 “Cancun” upgrade at block 98,800,200, aligning with Ethereum’s Cancun standard and introducing EIP-1559-style fee mechanics, improved EVM efficiency, and stronger consensus performance on mainnet. Separate to the protocol changes, XDC supported a $75 million tokenized debt issuance in Brazil, expanding its Latin American footprint and positioning the chain as a settlement layer for structured credit in emerging markets.
The combination of hybrid architecture, compliance-by-design tooling and EVM compatibility has led some industry observers to describe XDC as part of a blueprint for institutional-grade blockchain adoption in 2026. At the same time, market data from CoinGecko show 24-hour XDC trading volume around $46.1 million on certain days, a figure that has recently risen by over 11% in a single session, signalling that liquidity is gradually deepening as more venues list the token.
Cross-border payment infrastructure provider Tazapay said it closed an extension to its Series B funding round led by Circle Ventures, bringing the total raised to $36 million. The round included participation from Coinbase Ventures, CMT Digital, Peak XV Partners and Ripple.
Tazapay said on Thursday that the funding will be used to • expand its digital settlement technology for cross-border payments, secure additional licenses, expand across Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and the Americas, and build infrastructure for so-called “agentic payments.”
Tazapay said it serves over 1,000 enterprises and fintechs across 30 countries. It holds licences across Singapore, Canada, Australia, and the United States, with active applications underway in the European Union, United Arab Emirates and Hong Kong.
“The demand we’re seeing from enterprises and fintechs across Asia, LATAM, and the Middle East is unmistakable; businesses want to move money faster, cheaper, and with full regulatory confidence,” said Kanupriya Sharda, chief business officer at Tazapay.
Cointelegraph asked Tazapay whether it would disclose the size of the extension tranche and the company’s valuation, but had not received a response by publication.
Stablecoin payment infrastructure draws backers
The extension comes as crypto and fintech firms push deeper into stablecoin-based cross-border payments infrastructure.
On March 3, Ripple said it had expanded Ripple Payments into an end-to-end stablecoin and fiat platform for banks and fintechs. The company said the platform is live in more than 60 markets and has processed more than $100 billion in volume.
Related: Ripple joins Singapore sandbox to test RLUSD in trade finance
In May 2025, Boston-based cross-border payment company Conduit raised $36 million in a Series A funding round led by Dragonfly and Altos Ventures to scale its payment system and expand fiat and stablecoin currency offerings.
Conduit positions its payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT messaging network, which banks have relied on to process wire transfers since the 1970s.
Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight
SIREN is trading near $2.35 after a 340% weekly spike to a $1.8b valuation, with one wallet cluster holding 88% of supply and nearly $1b in unrealized profit.
Summary
- SIREN trades around $2.35 after a volatile week that saw the token jump more than 340% and briefly surpass a $1.8 billion market cap.
- Trading volume remains elevated in the $50 million range over the last full day, but on‑chain data shows one cluster still controls roughly 88% of circulating supply.
- Analysts warn concentration and unrealized profit in whale wallets could amplify downside, even as SIREN remains one of the most talked‑about BNB Chain meme tokens this week.
SIREN, a BNB Chain meme coin built around high‑volatility speculation, is changing hands near $2.35 today after a week in which its price jumped from below $0.90 to above $3.00 before retracing. Historical data from CoinLore shows SIREN closing at $0.9422 on March 21, 2026, then $2.30 on March 22, and $2.35 on March 23, marking a gain of roughly 149% in 48 hours and over 340% across the week. Over that same March 22–23 window, reported daily trading volume ranged between about $53.7 million and $195 million, locking SIREN into the top tier of actively traded meme assets on BNB Chain.
MEXC’s market wrap notes that SIREN’s fully diluted valuation pushed past $1.8 billion at the height of the rally, driven by aggressive spot buying and options‑style speculation. Yet Arkham and Dune Analytics data cited in that report highlight a single wallet cluster holding around 644 million SIREN tokens, or roughly 88% of circulating supply, with more than $950 million in unrealized profit at peak prices. A separate technical summary from CoinCodex places SIREN’s daily relative strength index around 64.78, with multiple simple and exponential moving averages still flashing “buy,” underscoring how momentum indicators remain elevated despite the recent pullback.
Headline‑driven price action has also pulled SIREN into broader meme‑coin narratives. BeInCrypto recently listed Siren among three meme tokens to watch into the final week of March 2026, citing its outsized weekly move compared to other BNB Chain names. In that context, SIREN’s profile now sits alongside other speculative meme assets covered by outlets like crypto.news, which has tracked similar surges in tokens such as PEPE and BONK during prior market risk‑on phases.
The race to make blockchains quantum-resistant is shaping into a test of governance, and decentralized networks may be at a disadvantage.
Quantum upgrades don’t stop at protocol-level changes. For major networks, they require wallet-level migration across millions of users, making coordination the bottleneck.
“The hard part is not changing the node itself, it’s having the wallets do the same,” said Yoon Auh, founder of BOLT Technologies, adding that each asset holder would need to migrate and do so in a coordinated way.
“If you go talk to Bitcoin or Ethereum, it’s a bit more perplexing because of the really decentralized and kind of ad hoc participation. It seems like whenever I hear about it, it’s more like herding cats.”
A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically break the public-key cryptography that underpins digital signatures and secure communications, threatening both blockchain wallets and core financial infrastructure.
Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is the proposed countermeasure, and the transition is already underway. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has urged organizations to begin preparing for “harvest now, decrypt later” threats, while US policy sets 2035 as the target for completing migration across federal systems.
Institutional governance is accelerating quantum upgrades
One place coordination may be easier is in institutional blockchain networks, where governance is tighter and the chain of authority is clearer.
Auh’s BOLT Technologies is running a pilot with the Canton Network to test a system that allows institutions to use and switch between multiple cryptographic signature schemes. Canton describes itself as an open blockchain for regulated institutions, designed to let participants exchange data and value without giving up privacy or control.
In regulated financial markets, infrastructure changes must meet internal controls, risk management standards, privacy requirements and interoperability demands across firms.
Canton is built around those constraints, positioning itself as infrastructure for regulated institutions and a way to connect siloed financial systems without sacrificing control.
In August 2024, NIST finalized its first set of post-quantum cryptography standards and explicitly urged system administrators to begin transitioning to them as soon as possible.
For regulated institutions, that kind of guidance makes delays harder to justify. Once migration becomes a recognized security and compliance issue, the networks most likely to move first are the ones that can turn technical advice into a managed operational process. Auh said that is one reason permissioned networks may be better positioned to move first.
“Because of their governance structure, you only need a few people there who are very knowledgeable to understand what’s going on,” he said. “And then because their governance is a lot quicker and a lot more organized, you can make those changes quicker.”
That does not mean permissioned networks have solved the post-quantum problem. It means they may be better equipped to test, approve and stage upgrades under real-world constraints.
Related: Banks will run RWAs on two blockchain rails, says RedStone co-founder
Coordination slows quantum upgrades on public networks
Public blockchains face a different coordination problem because major protocol changes cannot be approved by a small governing group.
On Bitcoin, protocol changes are suggested through the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) process, and the project’s own documentation says that “acceptance and adoption rests with the Bitcoin users.”
That makes a system-wide cryptographic migration harder to stage on public chains than on permissioned ones.
Given these coordination constraints, a post-quantum upgrade may require more disruptive upgrade paths, including a hard fork.
“I think it’s a very difficult thing to do with a soft fork,” he said. “They’re going to have to take the bitter medicine at some point and do a hard fork.
I know that it’s very traumatic for something like Bitcoin.”
On Ethereum, core changes move through the EIP process, where authors are expected to build consensus within the community and document dissenting opinions.
Ethereum’s governance documentation describes a process involving multiple stakeholder groups, including node operators, validators and EIP authors, while the AllCoreDevs process exists to coordinate technical work across contributors from different organizations.
Related: Are quantum-proof Bitcoin wallets insurance or a fear tax?
The real challenge in quantum migration is coordination
The post-quantum transition is often framed as a technical race to find the right cryptography, but the harder question may be whether a network can carry out the migration at all.
Auh said the industry should spend less time trying to predict the exact arrival of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer — often called “Q-Day” — and more time thinking about whether blockchain networks are structurally capable of responding.
“The recognition of the risk should spur you into action,” he said, arguing that preparation matters more than timeline guessing.
For permissioned blockchains, that process can be channeled through tighter governance, formal approval paths and institutional pressure to act. For public chains, the same migration has to pass through a wider and slower process shaped by developers, client teams, wallet providers and users.
General investors are more likely to focus on post-quantum readiness for networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum, whose growth has tracked the broader industry, though views on the risk remain split. Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood removed Bitcoin from a model portfolio, citing quantum concerns, while Blockstream CEO Adam Back has said the threat may still be decades away.
Magazine: Bitcoin may face hard fork over any attempt to freeze Satoshi’s coins
Kite is trading around $0.21–$0.22 with ~$400m market cap as profit‑taking and a broader AI‑token cooldown knock the AI payment chain about 30% off its early‑March high.
Summary
- Kite trades near $0.21–$0.22 with market cap around $400 million and 24h volume between roughly $114 million and $152 million.
- The AI-focused token sits around 30% below its early March all-time high near the $0.30–$0.32 range after a series of sharp rallies.
- Heavy volume, rapid gains since late 2025 and a broader cooldown in AI crypto have combined to push recent profit-taking.
Kite (KITE), a token tied to an AI-centric blockchain and payments ecosystem, is changing hands around $0.21–$0.22 today, easing back after a stretch of explosive gains. CoinMarketCap lists KITE at approximately $0.2148 with a 24-hour trading volume of $114.68 million and a live market capitalization of about $394.2 million, based on a circulating supply of 1.83 billion tokens. MEXC’s latest market note shows Kite trading at $0.22, up 20.3% in a prior 24-hour rally that saw volume hit $152.78 million, with the token briefly topping the platform’s gainer list. Those shifts underscore how quickly capital has rotated into and out of KITE as traders chase momentum.
Recent price action marks a comedown from early March highs. Phemex reported on March 5 that Kite surged 26% to a new all-time high, pushing above $0.30 amid what it described as strong market participation. By comparison, current prices near $0.21–$0.22 leave KITE roughly 30% off that peak, even as it remains up sharply versus late-2025 levels. Earlier coverage from AInvest highlighted Kite’s “market debut” in late 2025, noting rapid appreciation from initial listings and positioning the token as a high-beta AI play.
Kite is marketed as an AI-focused infrastructure and payments token, aligning it with the broader cluster of AI-related cryptocurrencies that saw outsized gains in late 2025 and early 2026. Binance’s coverage of the token’s early trading framed KITE as part of a wave of “AI payment chain” assets that rebounded alongside sector-wide AI sentiment. Mitrade’s February 2026 brief, titled “Kite Price Forecast: KITE surges 14%, outpacing other AI crypto tokens,” noted that Kite was outperforming its AI peers during that period, reflecting strong speculative demand. Together, those data points place KITE within the AI and infrastructure category rather than in DeFi or memecoin niches.
While detailed on-chain whale analytics for Kite are limited in public dashboards, the size and persistence of recent volume spikes hint at substantial large-trader participation. MEXC’s report emphasizes that KITE’s single-day volume of $152.78 million represented a jump of more than 70% versus its prior average, suggesting both new entries and active profit-taking. CoinMarketCap’s volume figures, consistently above $100 million in recent sessions, support the view that price swings are being driven more by short-term trading flows than by slow, organic accumulation.
Kite’s trajectory also mirrors a broader cooling in AI crypto after an overheated start to 2026. Sector-wide pieces have documented how AI tokens rallied aggressively before giving back part of their gains as traders reassessed valuations and rotated into other narratives. For readers tracking performance in real time, the Kite price page on the crypto.news market-cap dashboard offers live quotes, market cap and volume metrics, and can be used to compare KITE’s volatility and liquidity against other AI-focused tokens and major benchmarks like Bitcoin and BNB.
Stand With Crypto (SWC), the advocacy organization launched by cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, said that its strategy for turning out crypto-minded voters in the 2026 US midterm elections will prioritize races in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
In a Thursday announcement, SWC said its November 2026 battleground races would include industry-supported candidates in Iowa, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, where “crypto voters represent a meaningful and potentially decisive share of the electorate.”
The advocacy group added that its priority for the midterms would be in Ohio’s 9th Congressional District and Pennsylvania’s 10th Congressional District, where the respective incumbents Democrat Marcy Kaptur and Republican Scott Perry “have concerning records on crypto policy.” Perry voted against the GENIUS Act in 2025, while Kaptur voted against the payment stablecoins bill and the CLARITY market structure bill.
Stand With Crypto said it would use an “aggressive, get-out-the-vote effort” with its advocates, including “paid media campaigns across digital and direct mail, targeted SMS outreach, and robust digital organizing through email and social platforms” as well as groundwork to turn out crypto voters. The group’s platform includes information on candidates’ positions on crypto policy based on their public statements, voting records and their responses to the organization’s questionnaire.
Launched in 2023 as part of an effort to “unite global crypto advocates,” SWC is one of several crypto-affiliated organizations expected to influence voters in 2026. The group reported about 270 “pro-crypto” candidates won seats in the US House of Representatives and Senate in 2024, with many of the same candidates up for reelection this year.
Related: Crypto-backed PAC spends $8.6M in Illinois races ahead of US midterms
Stand With Crypto said in November 2025 that how US lawmakers vote on a crypto market structure bill could impact their reelection prospects. At the time, the Senate was expected to move forward on market structure legislation, but it is still unclear if or when the bill will advance out of committee and for a full floor vote.
“[As] market structure legislation continues to be negotiated in Congress, 74% of crypto owners say they would be more likely to support a candidate who supports making clearer regulations for cryptocurrency, with nearly a third (31%) who say they would be much more likely to support such a candidate,” SWC said as part of a February survey of 1,000 crypto holders.
2026 races seen testing crypto industry’s impact on candidates
Money from the crypto industry funneled through political action committees (PACs) like Fairshake may have already influenced 2026 voters in early state primaries.
Protect Progress, a Fairshake affiliate spent $1.5 million opposing the reelection of Texas Representative Al Green, who has served in Congress since 2005. Although Green did not lose the Democratic primary, he will head to a runoff with Christian Menefee in May. SWC rated Menefee as “strongly supports crypto.”
However, in Illinois, Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton won the Democratic Senate primary against Representatives Raja Krishnamoorthi and Robin Kelly. The victory came despite crypto-tied lobbyists spending millions of dollars on media buys supporting Krishnamoorthi. Stratton is expected to win in the general election and take the seat of retiring Democratic Senator Dick Durbin.
In 2024, Ohio saw some of the biggest spending from the crypto industry and other PACs to unseat Senator Sherrod Brown. Although the Democrat lost to Republican Bernie Moreno, he announced in August 2025 that he plans to run again, potentially leading to the industry eyeing the US state as a battleground for crypto.
“I would assume given the politics and the candidates in Ohio that there will be a s–tload of money spent here again,” former Ohio Representative Tim Ryan, who also sits on Coinbase’s Global Advisory Council, told Cointelegraph.
Magazine: The dirty secret about quantum signatures: No one knows if they work
Elon Musk’s X has hired crypto-native product designer Benji Taylor as its new head of design, ahead of a wider rollout of the platform’s X Money payments product next month.
Taylor announced the move on X on Wednesday, saying he was “honoured” to join the company and looking forward to working closely with Musk and X’s head of product Nikita Bier. Taylor’s crypto-native background is notable, previously founding Los Feliz Engineering, a consumer software studio that was acquired by decentralized lending protocol Aave Labs in 2023.
Bier said that he had followed Taylor’s work for years and knew that he was “on track to become one of the best designers in the world,” and that X was “finally teaming up and building the greatest design team in the industry.”
The appointment comes as X prepares to expand X Money, an integrated payments and financial services layer that will introduce peer-to-peer payments, wallet services and a debit card tied to user accounts.
Aave and Base roles
After the Aave acquisition in 2023, Taylor became chief product officer until October 2025, according to his LinkedIn profile, overseeing the company’s product strategy and development for its decentralized lending protocol and related applications.
Before joining X, he led design for Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network Base, where he was responsible for the network’s product and interface design across its user and developer-facing experiences. He earlier served as senior vice president of product and design at Avara, the renamed Aave Companies group.
Related: Musk confirms X Money beta testing ahead of planned 2025 launch
X Money rollout
The timing also stands out. In early March, Musk announced that X Money would begin public access next month, as an integrated payments and financial services layer for the social platform.
The product is currently in limited external beta and offers users a 6% annual percentage yield on cash balances held in an X Money wallet, a personalized metal Visa debit card engraved with the user’s X handle, and peer-to-peer payments linked directly to the X app.
Musk has described X Money as part of his plan to turn the platform into an “everything app” that combines social networking, messaging and financial services.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
Circle Internet Group’s CRCL stock is showing signs of a potential 25% rebound after the market may have reacted too aggressively to fears surrounding draft CLARITY Act language tied to stablecoin yield restrictions.
Key takeaways:
-
CRCL is attempting to stabilize above a major support confluence near $100.75.
-
Analysts say draft CLARITY Act language may hurt distributor incentives more than Circle’s core reserve-income model.
CRCL stock holds support, opening path to $130
From a technical perspective, CRCL is trying to base near an important support cluster around $100.75, where the 100-day exponential moving average (100-day EMA) aligns with the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement level.
That confluence held even as the stock suffered a brutal 20% single-session decline, a sign that dip buyers stepped in around a historically relevant area on the chart.
The stock could rebound toward the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement level near $130 in the coming weeks if CRCL continues to hold the current floor, representing roughly 25% increase.
The bullish setup also gains some support from institutional buyers. Ark Invest bought about $16 million worth of Circle shares during the plunge on Tuesday, showing that some investors viewed the sell-off as an opportunity.
Still, the setup remains conditional. A decisive break below the $100.75 support confluence would weaken the rebound case and shift downside focus toward the 50-day EMA near $84.25.
That level also aligns with a pullback target shared by independent TradingView analyst Jackie.
CLARITY Act doesn’t affect Circle yield
CRCL fell after traders worried that draft CLARITY Act language could limit stablecoin-linked yield incentives and slow USDC growth.
But Bernstein kept its $190 price target, saying the proposal does not affect Circle’s ability to earn yield on reserves or pay distribution partners such as Coinbase, Binance, or OKX. Ark Invest’s Lorenzo Valente made a similar point.
I think people are misunderstanding what’s happening here.
The new draft of the CLARITY Act does not prohibit issuers from paying distributors such as @coinbase , @binance , or @okx . The discussion around yield is really about retail holders, meaning the end users who actually… https://t.co/hmXpIRyooi
— Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) March 25, 2026
Circle’s model is simple: it takes the cash backing its stablecoins, invests it in deposits and short-dated US Treasurys, earns yield on those reserves, and shares part of that income with partners.
In 2025, for instance, Circle earned about $2.64 billion in reserve income from roughly $75.3 billion worth of USDC reserves. It doesn’t pay yield directly to USDC holders but to its distribution partners.
Bernstein added that if yield competition becomes harder across the sector, Circle’s market position could actually improve.
Related: Circle taps African fintech Sasai to expand USDC adoption in cross-border payments
Presenting similar arguments, Bitwise said Circle’s market valuation may reach about $75 billion by 2030, almost three times its current worth.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
GameStop revealed on Tuesday that it pledged nearly all of its Bitcoin as collateral on Coinbase as part of a covered call strategy in January, ending two months of speculation over whether it had sold the coins.
In a 10-K annual report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday, the video game retailer revealed it pledged 4,709 Bitcoin (BTC), nearly all of its Bitcoin, as collateral under an agreement with Coinbase Credit, using the position to sell covered call options.
The SEC filing clears speculation from January that GameStop was preparing to exit its Bitcoin position after onchain analysts pointed out that it transferred its entire Bitcoin holdings to Coinbase Prime.
The Bitcoin treasury industry has faced pressure in recent months as Bitcoin has fallen 45% from its all-time high, with some analysts casting doubt last year on the sustainability of buy-and-hold strategies.
The move shows GameStop sought to earn income on its Bitcoin by placing short-dated call options with strike prices between $105,000 and $110,000 that are set to expire Friday.
The disclosure shows a $2.3 million unrealized gain and a $700,000 liability tied to the options, while some covered-call contracts expired unexercised in January.
GameStop’s covered call strategy enables it to sell call options that give buyers the right to purchase its Bitcoin at a fixed price. GameStop earns premiums and retains the Bitcoin if the options aren’t exercised.
GameStop directly holds just one Bitcoin now
Since GameStop moved 4,709 Bitcoin to Coinbase, a counterparty that can rehypothecate or reuse the pledged Bitcoin, GameStop is no longer counting those assets as directly held.
Putting Bitcoin up as collateral “resulted in the derecognition of the pledged digital assets and the corresponding recognition of a digital asset receivable,” GameStop said in the filing.
“Although the classification of these assets has changed, our economic exposure is consistent with direct ownership of the underlying Bitcoin,” it added.
GameStop still holds one Bitcoin that wasn’t put up for collateral.
GameStop added that its pledged Bitcoin was worth $368.3 million by Jan. 31 and that it recorded an unrealized loss of $59.7 million on that date because of Bitcoin’s price drop.
Related: Bitcoin in ‘later stages’ of bear market: Watch these BTC price levels
GameStop launched a Bitcoin treasury after its CEO, Ryan Cohen, met with Strategy chair Michael Saylor in February 2025 to discuss how Bitcoin strategies can be implemented.
Prior to moving the 4,709 Bitcoin to Coinbase, GameStop’s Bitcoin stash ranked in the top 25 Bitcoin treasuries by holding size.
Magazine: Bitcoin may face hard fork over any attempt to freeze Satoshi’s coins
White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks is changing titles and joining the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology as co-chair, he announced Thursday.
Sacks, who was named U.S. President Donald Trump’s crypto and AI czar before Trump retook office last January, has overseen the White House’s early work on crypto initiatives, including the passage of the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act and more recently, work around the crypto market structure bill.
“PCAST is the principal body of external advisors tasked with shaping science, technology, and innovation policy for the President and the White House,” he said in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “Thirteen of the world’s most accomplished leaders in science and technology will join us as this PCAST’s initial members.”
Sacks told Bloomberg earlier Thursday that his czar role was designated as a “special government employee,” meaning he legally could only serve in that position for 130 working days. Democrats in Congress had already raised concerns that he had exceeded this period last fall.
He does not have this same issue serving as a co-chair on the advisory committee.
Sacks said in the Bloomberg interview that the council would make policy recommendations and conduct studies around artificial intelligence, quantum computing, nuclear power and other “cutting edge technologies.”
“I think you can expect us to make some recommendations in those areas. We want to push forward the president’s A.I. framework that was already released just last week,” Sacks said in the interview. “So you’ll see, I think, a lot of activity around that. But it will also be other areas as well.”
Sacks did not mention crypto in the interview.
Other members of the committee include Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Marc Andreessen, Google co-founder Sergey Brin, Dell founder Michael Dell, early Coinbase backer Fred Ehrsam, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, AMD CEO Lisa Su and Meta (formerly Facebook) founder Mark Zuckerberg, among others. Michael Kratsios, who’s served in both of Trump’s administrations, will serve as the co-chair.
San Diego International Airport TSA Wait Time Improve After Long Lines at San Diego Airport
XDC price holds near $0.032 as enterprise RWA narrative deepens
Flo Milli Celebrates Her Pregnancy Reveal In Heartfelt Post
-
Crypto World6 days agoNIO (NIO) Stock Plunges 6.5% as Shelf Registration Sparks Dilution Worries
-
NewsBeat2 days agoManchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Adidas – Corporette.com
-
Politics6 days agoJenni Murray, Long-Serving Woman’s Hour Presenter, Dies Aged 75
-
Crypto World5 days agoBest Crypto to Buy Now: Strategy Just Spent $1.57 Billion on Bitcoin During Fear While Early Investors Quietly Enter Pepeto for 150x Potential
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin Price News: Bhutan Sells $72 Million in BTC Under Fiscal Pressure, but the Smart Money Entering Pepeto Sees What the Market Does Not
-
Tech7 days agoinKONBINI Lets You Spend Summer Days Behind the Register
-
News Videos23 hours agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
Sports4 days agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
Sports4 days agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Tech4 days agoGive Your Phone a Huge (and Free) Upgrade by Switching to Another Keyboard
-
Business4 days agoNo Winner in March 21 Drawing as Prize Rolls to $133 Million for Next
-
Sports6 days ago2026 Kentucky Derby horses, odds, futures, preview, date: Expert who nailed 12 Derby-Oaks Doubles enters picks
-
Tech4 days agoAI enters the chat: New Seattle dating app relies on tech to facilitate meaningful human connections
-
Business6 days ago
Columbia Sportswear enters $500 million credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase
-
Tech5 days agoToday’s NYT Connections Hints, Answers for March 22 #1015
-
News Videos4 days agoCh 9 Financial Management Part 1 | Detailed One Shot | Class 12 Business Studies Boards 2026
-
Business5 days agoWill Duke Basketball Win It All? Duke Basketball Enters Second Round as Third Favorite to Claim NCAA Title
-
Business5 hours agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
Crypto World6 days agoSmall-cap Russell 2000 enters correction territory
You must be logged in to post a comment Login