The European Parliament backed the European Central Bank’s (ECB) digital euro initiative, casting it as a strategic tool in an era of rising geopolitical and financial tensions. In a plenary vote, MEPs approved the annual ECB report by 443 votes in favor, 71 against and 117 abstentions, endorsing amendments that frame the digital euro as essential to strengthening EU monetary sovereignty, reducing fragmentation in retail payments, and bolstering the integrity of the single market. The resolution underscores a policy stance that public money in digital form can curb Europe’s reliance on non-EU payment providers and private instruments, a concern voiced by policymakers amid broader global pressures.

Lawmakers also pressed for central bank autonomy, arguing that ECB independence must be safeguarded from political interference to preserve price stability and market confidence. In the debate, Johan Van Overtveldt, a former Belgian finance minister and MEP, warned that independence is not merely a technical characteristic; history shows that political meddling with central banks can trigger inflation, financial instability, and domestic strain. The emphasis on autonomy reflects a long-standing belief among European lawmakers that monetary policy should be shielded from short-term political cycles, a sentiment echoed as Europe maps out a retail payments framework that could influence the region’s financial architecture for years to come.

The discussion also touched on the broader narrative of digital finance as a public good and a geopolitical hedge. The European Parliament’s stance aligns with a growing consensus among central bankers and economists that a digitally native euro could serve as a sovereign tool—built on European infrastructure and standards—that reduces exposure to external payment rails and foreign governance. In remarks that circulated last month, ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone described the digital euro as “public money in digital form” and tied it to concerns about the “weaponisation of every conceivable tool,” a reflection of the risk environment surrounding global finance. Cipollone argued for a payments system that Europeans fully control, emphasizing resilience and strategic autonomy as key design principles.

The resolution also reiterates that cash remains a cornerstone of the euro area’s monetary system. Even as the ECB advances a digital complement, both physical and digital euros are designated as legal tender, ensuring that the public retains access to a universally accepted form of money. This stance is consistent with a broader push to position the digital euro not as a replacement for cash but as a parallel instrument designed to streamline cross-border transactions, improve settlement efficiency, and reduce reliance on external providers in times of stress. The emphasis on maintaining cash aligns with concerns about inclusivity and financial access, particularly for segments of the population that rely on traditional cash channels or may be unevenly served by new digital rails.

Digital euro as public good and geopolitical hedge

Beyond its domestic implications, the vote signals how Europe contends with a shifting global payments landscape. The digital euro is framed as a public good meant to strengthen policy sovereignty, reassuring citizens that EU institutions will steward a secure, interoperable, and accessible payments infrastructure. The debate also reflects unease about the potential dominance of non-EU payment schemes and the geopolitical leverage that private digital-payment networks could wield in a crisis. By advancing a centralized, EU-controlled alternative, policymakers aim to preserve policy levers and maintain financial stability even when external networks face disruptions or strategic realignments.

The debate has continued to unfold in parallel with calls from economists and policy experts who argue for a robust public option. In January, a coalition of economists urged MEPs to prioritize the public interest in the digital euro project, warning that neglecting a strong EU option could leave the bloc more exposed to the influence of private and foreign players in its financial system. The push reflects a nuanced balance: leveraging digital innovation to improve efficiency and security while safeguarding public accountability and democratic oversight. The outcome of these discussions will shape not only how the euro area processes payments but also how Europe positions itself in global debates over digital sovereignty and financial regulation.

The broader policy environment around the digital euro is evolving as institutions contemplate both technical and governance dimensions. While the central bank’s autonomy remains a central pillar, the political process will continue to shape the instrument’s scope, privacy protections, and interoperability with existing payment rails. As Europe progresses, observers will watch for concrete milestones such as governance models, technical standards, and timelines for testing and deployment. The interplay between public and private sector interests, along with the union’s approach to data privacy and consumer protection, will be critical in determining the digital euro’s adoption trajectory and its reception among citizens and businesses alike.

Why it matters

The European Parliament’s endorsement of the digital euro underscores a shift in how Europe conceptualizes money in a digital era. For consumers, the availability of a euro-denominated digital instrument promises faster and cheaper retail payments across member states, with the added security of a centralized, Europe-wide framework. For businesses, a unified, EU-controlled platform could simplify cross-border settlements and reduce exposure to the fragility of foreign payment rails, particularly in times of geopolitical stress. For policymakers, the project represents an opportunity to align monetary policy with digital infrastructure, ensuring that policy tools remain effective in a rapidly evolving payments landscape.

For fintechs and developers, the digital euro offers a defined public utility that could serve as a foundation for innovative payment experiences while adhering to European standards for privacy, security, and market integrity. The emphasis on independence and robust governance signals a carefully calibrated path to deployment—one that seeks to incentivize responsible innovation while maintaining a strict line against political meddling that could destabilize markets. In this sense, the digital euro is less about a single currency-proof-of-concept and more about how a highly developed regional economy can harmonize monetary integrity with digital modernization in a way that strengthens resilience and confidence across the bloc.

For the broader crypto and digital assets discourse, the EP’s position reinforces a divide between public, centrally issued digital money and the private, often cross-border nature of crypto and stablecoins. While not a cryptocurrency itself, the digital euro’s design and governance could influence how lawmakers approach non-sovereign digital assets, including questions about payments settlement, privacy standards, and cross-border interoperability. The outcome will likely feed into ongoing debates about regulatory clarity, consumer protection, and the degree to which public and private digital money can coexist without compromising financial stability.

What to watch next

• Progress updates from the ECB on digital euro development, including governance and technical architecture.
• Further parliamentary discussions and amendments clarifying the balance between independence, oversight, and integration with existing payment systems.
• Policy guidance on the role of cash in a digital euro era and how legal tender considerations will be maintained.
• Potential pilots or phased rollouts that test interoperability with national infrastructures and private payment providers.

Sources & verification

• European Parliament press release: MEPs stress the importance of independent central banks in times of tension (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/da/press-room/20260205IPR33621/meps-stress-importance-of-independent-central-banks-in-times-of-tension)
• Transcript and remarks from Johan Van Overtveldt on ECB independence (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/vod.html?mode=chapter&vodLanguage=EN&internalEPId=2017060832131&providerMeetingId=20260209-0900-PLENARY#)
• ECB executive board member Piero Cipollone’s comments on digital euro as public money (https://cointelegraph.com/news/ecb-s-cipollone-says-digital-euro-key-to-payments-sovereignty-in-weaponised-world)
• Analysis and commentary from economists urging a strong public option for the digital euro (https://cointelegraph.com/news/70-economists-eu-lawmakers-digital-euro)

Monetary sovereignty in the digital age: Europe’s digital euro push

In summary, the European Parliament’s latest vote signals a consensus that the digital euro should be developed with an eye toward sovereignty, resilience, and public value. It recognizes the need to preserve monetary policy autonomy in the face of evolving digital finance dynamics while acknowledging the practical benefits of faster, more inclusive payments across the union. By insisting that cash remains legal tender and by prioritizing independence, lawmakers aim to construct a framework that can withstand geopolitical disruptions and shifting power dynamics in the payments landscape. The path forward will require careful calibration of governance, technology, and regulatory oversight—an undertaking that will shape Europe’s financial infrastructure for the foreseeable future.

North Korea-linked threat actors are escalating social engineering campaigns targeting cryptocurrency and fintech companies, deploying new malware designed to harvest sensitive data and steal digital assets.

In a recent campaign, a threat cluster tracked as UNC1069 deployed seven malware families aimed at capturing and exfiltrating victim data, according to a Tuesday report from Mandiant, a US cybersecurity firm that operates under Google Cloud.

The campaign relied on social engineering schemes involving compromised Telegram accounts and fake Zoom meetings with deepfake videos generated through artificial intelligence tools.

“This investigation revealed a tailored intrusion resulting in the deployment of seven unique malware families, including a new set of tooling designed to capture host and victim data: SILENCELIFT, DEEPBREATH and CHROMEPUSH,” the report states.

Related: CZ sounds alarm as ‘SEAL’ team uncovers 60 fake IT workers linked to North Korea

Mandiant said the activity represents an expansion of the group’s operations, primarily targeting crypto firms, software developers and venture capital companies.

The malware included two newly discovered, sophisticated data-mining viruses, named CHROMEPUSH and DEEPBREATH, which are designed to bypass key operating system components and gain access to personal data.

The threat actor with “suspected” North Korean ties has been tracked by Mandiant since 2018, but AI advancements helped the malicious actor scale up its operations and include “AI-enabled lures in active operations” for the first time in November 2025, according to a report at the time from the Google Threat Intelligence Group.

Cointelegraph contacted Mandiant for additional details regarding the attribution, but had not received a response by publication.

Related: Balancer hack shows signs of months-long planning by skilled attacker

Attackers are stealing crypto founder accounts to launch ClickFix attacks

In one intrusion outlined by Mandiant, attackers used a compromised Telegram account belonging to a crypto founder to initiate contact. The victim was invited to a Zoom meeting featuring a fabricated video feed in which the attacker claimed to be experiencing audio problems.

The attacker then directed the user to run troubleshooting commands in their system to fix the purported audio issue in a scam known as a ClickFix attack.

The provided troubleshooting commands had embedded a hidden single command that initiated the infection chain, according to Mandiant.

North Korea-linked illicit actors have been a persistent threat to both crypto investors and Web3-native companies.

In June 2025, four North Korean operatives infiltrated multiple crypto firms as freelance developers, stealing a cumulative $900,000 from these startups, Cointelegraph reported.

Earlier that year, the Lazarus Group was linked to the $1.4 billion hack of Bybit, one of the largest crypto thefts on record.

Magazine: Coinbase hack shows the law probably won’t protect you — Here’s why