Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Binance WSJ Lawsuit: The Crypto Exchange Sues Wall Street Journal Over ‘Defamatory’ Iran Sanctions Report

Published

on

The Binance crypto exchange has gone on the offensive against the Wall Street Journal and its Iran sanctions report

The Binance crypto exchange has officially filed a defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, or known as WSJ, in the Southern District of New York. The complaint, filed today (March 11), alleges the newspaper published false claims regarding the exchange’s compliance controls and handling of Iran sanctions data.

At the center of the dispute is a February report claiming Binance knowingly processed over $1Bn for sanctioned entities.

The Binance crypto exchange has gone on the offensive against the Wall Street Journal and its Iran sanctions report
SOURCE: TradingView

This news has led to the BNB price dropping 1% in the past hours, to $640, as investors are seemingly spooked at yet another potential legal dispute involving Binance.

CEO Richard Teng has condemned the reporting as inaccurate, stating the outlet ignored documented evidence provided before publication.

What’s the WSJ Report Actually Alleged And Why Binance Says It’s Wrong

The Wall Street Journal article, titled “Binance Fired Staff Who Flagged $1 Billion Moving to Sanctioned Iran Entities,” depicted a chaotic internal struggle at the world’s largest crypto exchange.

It is alleged that compliance staff were fired not for policy breaches, but for doing their jobs identifying illicit flows.

Specifically, the report claimed Binance processed $1.7Bn in transactions linked to Iranian entities, including a Hong Kong-based fiat-to-crypto converter called “Blessed Trust.”

Advertisement

According to the Journal, this activity continued despite internal red flags. The report immediately triggered a regulatory inquiry.

US Senator Richard Blumenthal cited the article as grounds for demanding a formal investigation into the exchange’s operations, which Binance CEO Richard Teng responded to on March 6, denying all claims.

The allegations arrived during a sensitive period for crypto regulation, mirroring the pressure seen as Democrats introduce bills to ban platforms like Polymarket over compliance concerns.

DISCOVER: Next Crypto to Explode in 2026

Binance Fires Back: 19 Ignored Responses and a 96.8% Compliance Claim

Binance’s defense hinges on what it calls willful disregard for the facts. The exchange claims it sent the WSJ 19 detailed responses and answered 27 specific questions before the publication deadline, none of which appeared in the final story.

Richard Teng publicly rejected the narrative, emphasizing that the employees in question were dismissed for data policy violations, not for flagging sanctions evasion.

Advertisement

The exchange cited hard numbers to counter the defamation claims. Binance states it has achieved a -96.8% reduction in sanctions exposure risks through upgraded protocols. Currently, more than 1,500 employees, nearly a quarter of the workforce within Binance, work in compliance.

Regarding the specific “Blessed Trust” account, Binance clarified that the entity was offboarded and reported to law enforcement in 2025, long before the WSJ report suggested the activity was ongoing.

What This Means for Binance and the Broader Crypto-Media Relationship

Advertisement

This lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, arguing the report caused harm that no simple correction can fix. The legal action follows a significant win for Binance on March 7, when a federal judge dismissed a separate lawsuit alleging the exchange facilitated terrorist financing.

That court found no material support was provided, strengthening Binance’s position that it is not liable for the actions of bad actors who might attempt to access the platform.

Traders are watching this case closely as a test of the “actual malice” standard in crypto reporting. While the exchange settled with the DOJ in 2023 for $4.3Bn over historical failures, this aggressive legal stance signals a refusal to accept what it deems false narratives about its current operations.

The focus now shifts to the WSJ’s response and whether the regulatory inquiry sparked by the article will sustain momentum without the supporting media narrative.

Advertisement

We will continue to update this story as more details emerge over the coming days and weeks.

EXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales to Buy in 2026

The post Binance WSJ Lawsuit: The Crypto Exchange Sues Wall Street Journal Over ‘Defamatory’ Iran Sanctions Report appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Ethereum Foundation Less Than 500 ETH Away From Hitting 70K Staked ETH Goal

Published

on

Ethereum, Staking

The Ethereum Foundation (EF), the non-profit organization that steers development of the Ethereum ecosystem, staked over 45,000 Ether (ETH) on Friday, bringing the total amount staked to about 69,500 ETH, less than 500 coins shy of the Foundation’s 70,000 goal.

The EF staked the coins in a series of transactions, each consisting of 2,047 ETH, with the total amount staked on Friday valued at over $92.2 million, according to data from Arkham Intelligence.

Ethereum, Staking
A portion of the ETH transfers from the Ethereum Foundation’s treasury to the Ethereum Beacon Deposit Contract for staking. Source: Arkham Intelligence

The EF began staking ETH in February as part of its revamped treasury strategy policy announced in June 2025 and will use the yield generated to fund protocol research, development and ecosystem grants. The EF said in its updated treasury policy:

“We are now increasingly moving into staking and DeFi, both to enhance financial sustainability and to support a key application category that is delivering on the promise of permissionless, secure access to base civilizational infrastructure for millions of people today.” 

The foundation staked 2,016 ETH, valued at about $4.1 million in February, followed by 22,517 ETH, valued at about $46.1 million, in March. The EF has locked over $143 million in ETH in the Ethereum Beacon Deposit Contract, according to Arkham Intelligence. 

Ethereum, Staking
The Ethereum Foundation’s crypto holdings and counterparties. Source: Arkham Intelligence

The adoption of a yield-bearing treasury strategy followed pressure from the Ethereum community on the EF to generate income from its treasury to cover expenses, rather than continually selling tokens to fund operations.

Related: Ethereum Foundation sells $10.2M worth of ETH to BitMine in OTC deal

Advertisement

Vitalik Buterin warns EF staking may force positions in hard forks

Validators, who lock up tokens to secure proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain networks, can influence which chain is valid in the event of a network hardfork, or a partition of a network into two competing chains.

“If EF stakes, ourselves, this de facto forces us to take a position on any future contentious hard fork,” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said in January 2025. 

The EF is exploring ways to mitigate the centralization risks posed by its staking activities in the event of a contentious hard fork, Buterin added. 

Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies: What the hell is PeerDAS?

Advertisement