Crypto World
Bitcoin and Ether ETFs Post $1.82B Outflows This Week
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ether (CRYPTO: ETH) ETFs listed in the United States faced renewed withdrawal pressure as market participants cooled on riskier assets amid mixed signals from macro and crypto-specific catalysts. Over a five-day window, investors pulled roughly $1.82 billion from spot BTC and ETH funds, with about $1.49 billion exiting Bitcoin ETFs and $327.1 million leaving Ether products, according to data tracked by Farside. The outflows aligned with a softer price backdrop for the two leading cryptocurrencies, which have traded lower as momentum waned after a prior rally. In the broader week, BTC and ETH declined by about 6.55% and 8.99%, respectively, placing them around $83,400 and $2,685 to end the period, per CoinMarketCap.
Key takeaways
- US spot BTC ETFs recorded $1.49 billion in net outflows over five trading days, while spot ETH ETFs saw $327.10 million leave, signaling a broad retreat from near-term investor exposure to the assets.
- Over the last week, Bitcoin and Ether fell 6.55% and 8.99%, with prices near $83,400 (BTC) and $2,685 (ETH) on the period’s close, underscoring a risk-off tilt despite recent recovery attempts.
- On January 14, Bitcoin ETF inflows reached the year’s peak at $840.6 million, a day that preceded the Crypto Fear & Greed Index’s move to a Greed score of 61—the strongest sentiment reading of the year at that moment.
- Analysts have framed the negative price action as possibly short-sighted, with ETF veteran Eric Balchunas arguing that the broader institutionalization narrative for BTC had been priced in too quickly and that the market may be underestimating the upside potential if demand eventually returns.
- Meanwhile, traditional assets like gold and silver surged early in the week before reversing some gains, highlighting a cross-asset backdrop where crypto was contending with a broader risk-on/risk-off dynamic.
- Industry observers like Matt Hougan suggested Bitcoin could move toward parabolic levels if sustained ETF demand materializes, underscoring the importance some investors place on product flows as a price driver.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Negative. Net ETF outflows coincided with softer spot prices for both leading cryptocurrencies, reinforcing a cautious near-term stance among investors.
Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold
Market context: The latest ETF flow data comes as the crypto market wrestles with liquidity dynamics, regulatory chatter, and evolving product structures. Flows into spot ETFs have long been watched as a proxy for retail and institutional willingness to accumulate, while macro narratives—ranging from technology adoption to risk-on sentiment—continue to shape price trajectories across digital assets.
Why it matters
The ebb and flow of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs serve as a practical gauge of demand from different investor cohorts. In the current cycle, persistent outflows can signal a broader risk-off handicap, particularly when futures-based or derivative exposure remains relatively robust by comparison. The January 14 influx into Bitcoin ETFs—recording $840.6 million—illustrates that fresh liquidity can still surface even as overall flows pull back, suggesting a bifurcated market where a subset of participants remains inclined to allocate capital to physical- or spot-backed vehicles.
Analysts have pointed to sentiment indicators as important contextual signals. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index reached a year-to-date high of Greed 61 on the strength of that inflow, illustrating a momentary optimism that contrasts with the back-of-house data showing ongoing outflows in spot products. Eric Balchunas, whose commentary often threads through ETF discourse, argued that the negative reaction to Bitcoin’s price action versus gold and silver was “very short-sighted,” noting that BTC’s late-2023 and 2024 performance had already showcased resilience after a difficult stretch. He emphasized that institutional dynamics had at times been priced in ahead of actual developments, a theme he reiterated in discussions around ETF adoption and the evolving narrative around BTC’s mainstream maturation.
The macro backdrop lent additional texture to the narrative. Gold and silver both hit notable highs earlier in the week—$5,608 for gold and $121 for silver—before retreating on Friday as a broader risk-off thread emerged. Gold dropped about 8% to $4,887, while silver slid roughly 27% to $84, underscoring that traditional safe-haven assets were not immune to the day’s volatility. In this environment, Bitcoin’s performance remains a focal point as market participants weigh the potential upside from new liquidity channels against the risk of further macro-induced downdrafts. Matt Hougan of Bitwise weighed in on the possibility of a parabolic run for Bitcoin if ETF demand persists over the longer horizon, highlighting how product infrastructure can influence price discovery when capital returns to the space.
What to watch next
- Follow net ETF flows in the coming weeks for BTC and ETH to see whether redemption pressures abate or accelerate, potentially signaling a shift in risk appetite.
- Monitor regulatory discourse and potential clarifications around asset-class ETFs, including any comments or proposals tied to the CLARITY Act or similar policy developments that could impact institutional participation.
- Track the Crypto Fear & Greed Index and other sentiment gauges for signs of a renewed appetite or renewed caution among a broader base of participants.
- Observe price action around the key levels cited in recent weeks (approximately $83k for BTC and $2.6k for ETH) to determine whether the market tests prior majors or aides to bounce back.
Sources & verification
- Farside ETF flow data for spot BTC and ETH products, including net outflows and inflows by day.
- CoinMarketCap price data for BTC and ETH during the referenced period.
- Crypto Fear & Greed Index (Alternative.me) readings associated with the January inflow.
- Eric Balchunas’ X posts commenting on Bitcoin’s price action, sentiment, and institutionalization narrative.
- Matt Hougan’s X post discussing Bitcoin’s potential parabolic move if ETF demand persists.
ETF flows weigh on BTC and ETH ETFs: market reaction and key details
In the United States, spot exposure to the two largest cryptocurrencies has remained a barometer for broader appetite among retail and institutional players. The latest data show that, over a five-day window, net withdrawals from BTC and ETH spot ETFs totaled approximately $1.82 billion. Of that total, Bitcoin-focused funds accounted for about $1.49 billion in redemptions, while Ether-focused products saw around $327.1 million exit, according to Farside’s dataset. This divergence mirrors a shared theme: risk-off sentiment that has lingered alongside a reticence to enter new long exposure, even as the underlying assets have displayed moments of resilience in other pockets of the market.
The price trajectory during the same window reflected that cautious stance. Bitcoin’s spot price retreat mirrored broader risk-off dynamics, with a seven-day drop of around 6.55%. Ether’s decline was steeper, at roughly 8.99% over seven days, leaving BTC near $83,400 and ETH near $2,685 at week’s end. The correlation between ETF flows and price action remains a matter of ongoing observation, but the data underscore that inflows into spot products can serve as a leading indicator of a renewed price tilt, while outflows tend to accompany consolidations or soft patches in the near term.
Conspicuously, the week also featured a rare moment of intensified liquidity in Bitcoin ETFs. On January 14, BTC ETFs logged their strongest daily inflow of 2026 at $840.6 million, a day that preceded a notable shift in sentiment as the Crypto Fear & Greed Index spiked to Greed 61—the year’s highest reading up to that point. The juxtaposition of that inflow with an ensuing pullback highlights the complexity of momentum in a market driven by both fundamental flows and sentiment cycles. As Balchunas noted, a portion of the negative sentiment surrounding Bitcoin’s recent moves appears to rest on a misread of how quickly the institutionalization narrative would translate into realized flows and price strength.
Beyond crypto-specific factors, traditional markets contributed to the backdrop. Gold and silver—often cited as cross-asset benchmarks for risk sentiment—also surged to all-time or near all-time highs earlier in the week, with gold touching a peak around $5,608 and silver around $121. Yet, by week’s end, prices drifted lower: gold fell 8% to approximately $4,887, and silver slipped roughly 27% to about $84. These moves underscore a landscape where crypto prices are increasingly influenced by a broad risk environment, even as some observers maintain that long-run demand for spot exposure could re-emerge should policy and product developments align with investor expectations.
Amid the debate on near-term direction, Bitwise’s Matt Hougan weighed in on the potential for a parabolic move if ETF demand endures. The comment reflects a long-standing view in certain corners of the market that institutional adoption could act as a powerful catalyst for BTC’s price trajectory, particularly if new funds and products unlock meaningful retail and high-net-worth participation. While the immediate term remains volatile, proponents of deeper ETF participation argue that a renewed wave of inflows would provide an important structural pillar for price discovery in the spot market.
Crypto World
Tom Lee’s BitMine Hosts Its Largest Corporate Event, Will Stock React?
Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on April 9, but the stock dropped nearly 2% despite an announcement of a $4 billion buyback.
The transition from the NYSE American to the main NYSE board marks the Ethereum-focused treasury firm’s largest corporate event to date.
BitMine Lands on NYSE, Expands Buyback to $4 Billion
Chairman Thomas “Tom” Lee confirmed the uplisting on April 9. BMNR ceased trading on the NYSE American after-market on April 8 and opened on the main board the following morning.
Alongside the move, BitMine’s board unanimously approved a fourfold expansion of its 2025 share repurchase program. The authorization grew from $1 billion to $4 billion, ranking it among the 10 largest buyback announcements in 2026, according to Fundstrat data.
“There may be a time in the future when Bitmine shares are trading below intrinsic value, and the Company wants to be in a position to accretively retire common shares,” read an excerpt in the announcement.
Repurchases will continue under existing terms through open market transactions via Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
4.8 Million ETH and a 5% Supply Target
As of this writing, BitMine held approximately 4.803 million Ethereum tokens valued at roughly $10.6 billion at current prices near $2,218.
That position represents 3.98% of total ETH supply, putting the firm over 79% toward its stated “Alchemy of 5%” accumulation target.
Despite these figures, BMNR stock slid from a previous close of $21.52, dipping as low as $20.50 during the session before partially recovering.
The muted reaction signals that investors may have already priced in the uplisting news, which BitMine first disclosed on April 6.
BitMine counts ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood, Founders Fund, Pantera Capital, and Galaxy Digital among its institutional backers.
The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Hosts Its Largest Corporate Event, Will Stock React? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Securitize names ex-SEC official Brett Redfearn as president ahead of public listing
Securitize has appointed former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) official Brett Redfearn as president and a member of its board, adding regulatory experience as the firm prepares to go public this year.
Redfearn, who previously led the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, will work with Securitize’s leadership team to scale its offerings across issuance, trading and fund administration, the company announced in a press release. The company focuses on turning traditional financial assets, such as funds or private credit, into blockchain-based tokens that can be traded more easily.
His appointment comes at a time when tokenization is gaining traction among large financial firms. Banks and asset managers are testing ways to move assets onto blockchain rails in an effort to speed up settlement and widen access to investors.
Securitize is positioning itself as a regulated bridge between those institutions and digital asset infrastructure. The hire adds weight to Securitize’s leadership as it prepares for a proposed public listing through a business combination with Cantor Equity Partners II. It also reflects a broader trend of firms bringing in former regulators to navigate a complex policy environment.
“Brett has been instrumental in how modern markets are structured and regulated,” Securitize co-founder and CEO Carlos Domingo said in a statement. “He is deeply familiar with our business, leadership team, and long-term vision.”
Redfearn brings experience from both traditional finance and crypto. Before joining Securitize, he founded Panorama Financial Markets Advisory, advising exchanges and asset managers. He also served as head of capital markets at Coinbase (COIN), where he worked on expanding institutional participation in digital assets. Prior to joining the SEC, Redfearn was at JP Morgan for over a dozen years.
Crypto World
BlackRock Crypto Cuts Ethereum Staking Fee to 18%: Too Cheap to Ignore?
BlackRock crypto just moved on Ethereum staking fees, and the number is 18%. The world’s largest asset manager has set its commission on gross staking rewards at 18% inside its iShares Staked Ethereum Trust, a fresh product that launched March 12 under the ticker ETHB, layered on top of a 0.25% annual management fee.
That dual-fee structure is already attracting fire from advisors and institutional allocators who built their models around simpler cost assumptions.
The trust holds $318 million in staked ETH as of publication, with the 18% staking commission split with Coinbase as custodian and validator operator.

At current ETH staking yields of roughly 2.74%, that commission alone translates to approximately 49 basis points of clipped return – before the sponsor fee touches the NAV.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
Will the Blackrock Ethereum Staking ETF Fee War Hit the Same Floor as Bitcoin?
Bitcoin ETF fees fell to zero in just 12 months. The largest issuers temporarily waived management fees entirely just to grab AUM, borrowing the index fund playbook and compressing margins until custody costs were practically the product.
The question now hanging over Ethereum staking ETFs is whether the same gravity applies – or whether staking complexity creates a structural floor that protects issuer margins.
The uncomfortable truth is that staking ETFs are operationally heavier than spot bitcoin products. Issuers must manage validator economics, slash risk exposure, define MEV extraction mechanics, and build reward distribution infrastructure, none of which is free.
BlackRock’s ETHB charges 0.25% on assets, the same rate as its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), but the 18% staking commission is a fundamentally different fee model with no direct parallel in the bitcoin ETF market.

Fidelity’s competing staking product sits at roughly 10% on rewards – a gap that makes BlackRock look expensive by 800 basis points on the commission line alone.
Tyrone Ross, CEO of Turnqey Financial, said plainly: “To me it was always about a fee grab. It was always about the big banks and the big funds packaging this up and hitting retail investors with fees.” Ethan Buchman, co-founder of Cosmos, takes a longer view – he expects the 18% rate to compress toward 15% or even 10% as competition intensifies, mirroring bitcoin ETF erosion.
But Harriet Browning, VP of Sales at Twinstake, warned that aggressive fee compression carries a hidden cost: providers cutting corners on security and validator transparency to protect margins. Those two realities coexist, and neither cancels out the other.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside
LiquidChain is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer — fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment.
The architecture centers on four pillars: a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once system that lets developers access all three ecosystems without rebuilding for each chain.
The project has been gaining visibility as institutional capital flows accelerate into L3 infrastructure. The presale is currently priced at $0.01447, with $646,857.56 raised to date. Presale-stage assets carry meaningful risk — liquidity is thin and execution is unproven. That caveat stands.
But for traders mapping the next cycle’s infrastructure layer, LiquidChain.
The post BlackRock Crypto Cuts Ethereum Staking Fee to 18%: Too Cheap to Ignore? appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Trump’s World Liberty Financial borrowed millions from a protocol its own advisor co-founded
World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture co-founded by the Trump family, has executed a series of transactions through decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol Dolomite that raises questions about insider access, circular token economics, and concentrated risk to other depositors.
Onchain records analyzed by CoinDesk, sourced from Etherscan, Arkham and publicly accessible wallet data, show the sequence began on Feb. 8, when WLFI’s treasury deposited 14 million USD1, its own dollar-pegged stablecoin, into Dolomite as collateral and borrowed 11.4 million USDC against it.
Minutes later, 11.45 million USDC moved to a Coinbase Prime deposit address, per Arkham. Two days later, 12.5 million USD1 was sent from the treasury to a separate Coinbase Prime deposit address. Coinbase Prime is typically used for converting crypto to fiat or for institutional OTC trading.
That 12.5 million USD1 was not borrowed from Dolomite. It moved directly from WLFI’s treasury wallet to the exchange, meaning the venture sent its own stablecoin straight to a fiat off-ramp.
But the WLFI token entered the picture twelve days later. On Feb. 20, the treasury deposited 890 million WLFI into Dolomite and borrowed 20 million USD1 against it.
On March 24, another 1.1 billion WLFI followed. In total, 1.99 billion WLFI tokens now sit as collateral inside Dolomite, and the treasury has received roughly 31.4 million in stablecoins from the protocol across both episodes.
The choice of protocol is not incidental, however.
Dolomite co-founder Corey Caplan is an advisor to World Liberty Financial. WLFI now sits at the top of Dolomite’s supplied-assets list with $458.9 million in supply liquidity, roughly 55% of the protocol’s entire $835.7 million total.
The structural concern sits in Dolomite’s USD1 pool. USD1, which now has $4.6 billion in circulation, ranks second on the protocol with $180 million supplied against $167.5 million borrowed, a utilization ratio of about 93%.
The USD1 supply rate sits at 16.24% and the borrow rate at 9.18%, figures that reflect concentrated borrowing activity rather than broad organic demand.
At that utilization, ordinary depositors who lent USD1 to the pool expecting to withdraw at will cannot all do so at once. Their funds are effectively locked until the large borrower repays.
The collateral backing the WLFI-denominated borrow is a separate problem.
WLFI trades with limited market depth relative to the size of the position. If the token moves sharply lower and Dolomite’s liquidation mechanism triggers, the forced sale would crash the price before the collateral could be unwound, leaving the protocol holding bad debt that would fall on the same retail depositors who currently cannot exit.
Activity escalated in April through a different route. On April 2, the WLFI treasury sent 2 billion WLFI to a Gnosis Safe proxy wallet at address 0x44a681DD. Five days later, it sent another 1 billion.
Neither transfer went directly to Dolomite, and onchain data does not yet show where those tokens are headed. The three billion additional tokens are worth roughly $266 million at WLFI’s current price of $0.0888.
World Liberty Financial did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment.
Crypto World
Yuga Settles Bored Ape NFT Trademark Lawsuit with Artist Ryder Ripps
Yuga Labs has reached a settlement in its NFT counterfeiting lawsuit against artist Ryder Ripps and his business partner Jeremy Cahen, with parties agreeing to permanent blocks on trademark and imagery use.
Yuga Labs has settled its NFT counterfeiting lawsuit against artist Ryder Ripps and business partner Jeremy Cahen. The parties have filed proposed orders to permanently block Ripps and Cahen from using Yuga’s imagery and trademarks, according to Reuters, citing court documents.
The settlement concludes the legal dispute over alleged unauthorized use of Yuga’s intellectual property, namely involving its Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) collection. Terms of the settlement have not been disclosed beyond the trademark and imagery restrictions outlined in the proposed court orders.
Sources: Reuters
This article was generated automatically by The Defiant’s AI news system from publicly available sources.
Crypto World
BTC reverses early loss, rises above $72,000 on Middle East hopes
What appeared to be a down day in crypto markets has turned positive after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he told his cabinet to start negotiations with Lebanon as soon as possible. This came after NBC News reported that President Trump had requested Netanyahu scale back bombing in Lebanon as it threatened Monday’s announced ceasefire.
Bitcoin quickly rose about 3% as the news hit, now trading at $72,300, up 2% over the past 24 hours. U.S. stocks also reversed modest early losses, with the Nasdaq now ahead 0.65%. Having surged to nearly $103 per barrel earlier in the day, WTI crude oil quickly pulled back to $98.60.
Bitcoin is notably outperforming other crypto majors, with ether (ETH), solana (SOL) and XRP (XRP) all higher by less than 1%.
Continued divergence with software stocks
Firmly linked at the hip in recent months, bitcoin and software stocks continued to diverge on Thursday. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF (IGV) fell 4%, approaching a key support level around $76, a level it has tested and rebounded from multiple times.
Over the past month, bitcoin is up 9%, while IGV is down 12%.
On a 20-day moving average basis, the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and IGV has dropped to a relatively low 0.34, reinforcing the recent divergence in their price movements.

Crypto World
North Korean Cyber Spies Are No Longer Just Remote Threats
This month’s $285 million exploit on Drift, a decentralized exchange (DEX), was the largest crypto hack in over a year, when exchange Bybit lost $1.4 billion. North Korean state-backed hackers were named as prime suspects in both attacks.
This past autumn, attackers posed as a quantitative trading firm and approached Drift’s protocol team in person at a major crypto conference, said Drift in an X post Sunday.
“It is now understood that this appears to be a targeted approach, where individuals from this group continued to deliberately seek out and engage specific Drift contributors, in person, at multiple major industry conferences in multiple countries over the following six months,” said the DEX.
Until now, North Korean cyber spies have targeted crypto firms online, through virtual calls and remote work. An in-person approach at a conference would not typically raise suspicion, but the Drift exploit should be enough for attendees to review connections made at recent events.

North Korea expands crypto playbook beyond hacks
Blockchain forensics firm TRM Labs described the incident as the largest DeFi hack of 2026 (so far) and the second-largest exploit in Solana’s history, just behind the $326 million Wormhole bridge hack in 2022.
The initial contact dates back about six months, but the exploit itself traces to mid-March, according to TRM. The attacker began by moving funds from Tornado Cash and deploying the CarbonVote Token (CVT), while using social engineering to persuade multisig signers to approve transactions that granted elevated permissions.
They then manufactured credibility for CVT by minting a large supply and inflating trading activity to simulate real demand. Drift’s oracles picked up the signal and treated the token as a legitimate asset.
When the pre-approved transactions were executed on April 1, CVT was accepted as collateral, withdrawal limits were increased and funds were withdrawn in real assets, including USDC.

Related: North Korean spy slips up, reveals ties in fake job interview
According to TRM, the speed and aggressiveness of the subsequent laundering exceeded that seen in the Bybit hack.
North Korea is widely believed to be using large-scale crypto thefts such as the Drift and Bybit attacks alongside longer-term tactics, including placing operatives in remote roles at tech and crypto firms to generate steady income. The United Nations Security Council has said such funds are used to support the country’s weapons program.
Security researcher Taylor Monahan said infiltration of DeFi protocols dates back to “DeFi summer,” adding that around 40 protocols have had contact with suspected DPRK operatives.
North Korean state media reported Thursday that the country tested an electromagnetic weapon and a short-range ballistic missile, known as the Hwasong-11, fitted with cluster munition warheads.

Infiltration network fuels steady crypto revenue
A separate investigation revealed how a network of North Korea-linked IT workers generated millions through prolonged infiltration.
Data obtained from an anonymous source shared by ZachXBT showed the network posing as developers and embedding themselves across crypto and tech firms, generating roughly $1 million a month and more than $3.5 million since November.
The group secured jobs using falsified identities, routed payments through a shared system, then converted funds to fiat and sent them to Chinese bank accounts via platforms such as Payoneer.

Related: Are you a freelancer? North Korean spies may be using you
The operation relied on basic infrastructure, including a shared website with a common password and internal leaderboards tracking earnings.
The agents applied for roles in plain sight using VPNs and fabricated documents, pointing to a longer-term strategy of embedding operatives to extract steady revenue.
Defenses evolve as infiltration tactics spread
Cointelegraph encountered a similar scheme in a 2025 investigation led by Heiner García, who spent months in contact with a suspected operative.
Cointelegraph later took part in García’s dummy interview with a suspect who went by “Motoki,” who claimed to be Japanese. The suspect rage quit the call after failing to introduce himself in his supposed native dialect.
The investigation found operatives bypassed geographic restrictions by using remote access to devices physically located in countries such as the US. Instead of VPNs, they operated those machines directly, making their activity appear local.
By now, tech headhunters have realized that the person at the other end of a virtual job interview may indeed be a North Korean cyber spy. A viral defence strategy is to ask suspects to insult Kim Jong Un. So far, the tactic has been effective.

However, as Drift was approached in person and García’s findings showed operatives finding creative methods to bypass geographic restrictions, North Korean actors have continued to adapt to the cat-and-mouse dynamic.
Requesting interviewees to call North Korea’s supreme leader a “fat pig” is an effective strategy for the time being, but security researchers warn that this won’t work forever.
Magazine: Phantom Bitcoin checks, China tracks tax on blockchain: Asia Express
Crypto World
Zscaler (ZS) Stock Plummets 8% Following BTIG Downgrade Amid Competitive Pressures
Key Highlights
- Shares of Zscaler (ZS) declined approximately 8% on April 9, 2026, reaching a 52-week low of $127.88
- BTIG analyst downgraded the stock from Buy to Neutral, removing it from the firm’s preferred picks
- Research involving five industry sources highlighted intensifying competitive threats from Cloudflare and Netskope
- The stock has tumbled 39% since the start of the year and 56% over the previous half-year period
- BTIG lowered its fiscal 2027 ARR projection to $4.355B, trailing Street expectations of $4.447B
Shares of Zscaler experienced a significant decline of approximately 8% during Wednesday’s trading session on April 9, sliding to a 52-week low of $127.88. The sharp downturn followed a rating cut by BTIG analyst Gray Powell, who moved the stock from Buy to Neutral and eliminated it from the firm’s top picks roster for the first half of 2026.
Powell’s rating adjustment stemmed from proprietary research conducted with five industry sources throughout the previous week. Although near-term business trends appeared relatively steady, the outlook for the coming six to twelve months revealed more cautious sentiment among the majority of contacts surveyed.
The analyst highlighted escalating competitive dynamics as the primary concern. Cloudflare and Netskope emerged as the most significant competitive challenges. Additionally, traditional firewall providers have demonstrated improved success in cross-selling their proprietary SASE solutions to their existing customer base, creating obstacles for Zscaler’s ability to capture additional market opportunities.
According to the firm’s analysis, the broader platform expansion narrative for Zscaler has failed to materialize as anticipated half a year ago.
Analyst Lowers Revenue Projections
BTIG has adjusted its fiscal 2027 financial model, now forecasting annual recurring revenue of $4.355 billion, representing 16.5% growth compared to the previous year. This revised figure marks a reduction from the firm’s earlier projection of $4.391 billion and falls short of the Street consensus estimate of $4.447 billion.
The security software provider’s shares have declined 39% since the beginning of the year. This performance contrasts with a 24% drop observed across BTIG’s entire coverage portfolio during the identical timeframe. Over a six-month horizon, the stock has surrendered 56% of its value.
Despite BTIG’s more conservative stance, the broader Wall Street analyst community maintains a more optimistic view. The consensus rating for ZS remains at Buy. Target prices among analysts span a wide range from $155 to $335.
Cantor Fitzgerald maintained its Overweight recommendation following Zscaler‘s impressive second-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings report. The cybersecurity firm exceeded projections across multiple metrics including revenue, ARR, earnings per share, and free cash flow generation, while also elevating its full-year outlook across critical performance indicators.
Additional Recent News
Freedom Capital Markets preserved its Buy recommendation while reducing its price objective from $320 to $270, reflecting a broader recalibration of SaaS sector valuations. Wells Fargo launched coverage with an Overweight stance and established a $200 target, emphasizing the company’s platform expansion trajectory and resilient core operations.
The cloud security provider recently disclosed plans to enhance its data sovereignty offerings through an upcoming deployment in Canada. The organization presently operates 160 data centers across the globe.
Evercore analysts noted that Anthropic’s recently launched Claude Mythos model, designed specifically for cybersecurity applications, could create headwinds for cybersecurity sector stocks, with Zscaler among those potentially affected.
As of the latest reporting period, ZS commanded a market capitalization of $22.17 billion. The stock’s average daily trading volume stands at approximately 2.75 million shares. Technical indicators currently signal a Sell rating.
The shares were hovering near their 52-week trough of $128 as of April 9, 2026.
Crypto World
Stablecoins Emerge as Financial Infrastructure, but Banks Remain Cautious: S&P Report
Stablecoins are rapidly evolving beyond their original role in crypto trading, emerging as a key layer of financial infrastructure, according to new research from S&P Global Market Intelligence.
The report highlights a growing shift toward institutional use cases, particularly in cross-border payments, treasury operations, and capital markets, while traditional banks continue to take a cautious, exploratory approach.
Stablecoins Move Beyond Trading
“Stablecoins are evolving beyond a crypto trading tool into a new layer of financial infrastructure,” said Jordan McKee, Director of Fintech Research at S&P Global Market Intelligence.
According to the report, the most meaningful adoption is happening behind the scenes, where stablecoins are improving settlement speed, capital efficiency, and liquidity movement rather than being widely used at the consumer level.
Market Growth Accelerates
The stablecoin market is expanding rapidly:
- Circulation reached approximately $269 billion in 2025
- Projected to grow to around $434 billion by 2028
- Mentions in earnings calls surged to 107 in 2025, up from just five in 2024

This sharp increase reflects rising interest from banks, fintech firms, and payment providers exploring the role of stablecoins in modern financial systems.

Institutional Use Cases Lead Adoption
Adoption remains concentrated in infrastructure-level applications, including:
- Cross-border payments
- Treasury and liquidity management
- Tokenized capital markets
In these areas, stablecoins are helping reduce settlement times and improve capital mobility across global markets.
Consumer Adoption Still Limited
Despite the growing institutional interest, consumer adoption remains low, especially in developed markets.
Only 12% of U.S. consumers report familiarity with stablecoins, with concerns around security, fraud, and lack of clear use cases acting as key barriers.
Banks Take a Wait-and-See Approach
The report also reveals a significant gap between infrastructure development and institutional readiness.
Among 100 primarily smaller U.S. financial institutions surveyed:
- Only 7% are developing internal stablecoin frameworks
- None are actively piloting stablecoin initiatives
This suggests that while the technology is advancing quickly, many banks are still evaluating how and when to engage.
Regulation and Competition to Shape the Future
Since the start of 2025, at least 19 applications for banking charters related to digital asset services have been submitted to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
As the market matures, S&P Global Market Intelligence expects adoption to be driven less by consumer usage and more by:
- Institutional integration
- Regulatory frameworks
- Competition across issuance, liquidity, and distribution
The report concludes that stablecoins are entering a critical infrastructure buildout phase, which will likely define their role in the global financial system over the coming years.
Crypto World
Crypto Card Fees Explained: Hidden Costs To Know
A crypto card can look simple. You tap to pay, shop online, or withdraw cash, and it works much like a regular card.
Still, the total cost is not always obvious. Depending on the provider, users may pay blockchain fees, conversion costs, foreign exchange charges, ATM fees, or merchant markups. Some of those costs appear clearly. Others are built into the rate or show up only at checkout.
That is why the real cost of a crypto card is not one single fee. It is the total cost of moving funds, converting them, and spending them.
Network fees can start before you even spend
The first cost can appear when a user moves crypto into a wallet or account linked to the card. In that case, the blockchain may charge a network fee, often called a gas fee.
That fee usually does not come from the card provider. Instead, it comes from the network that processes the transaction. As a result, the cost can change depending on which blockchain the user picks and how busy that network is.
So even before the card is used for a purchase, the funding step may already carry a cost.
The exchange rate can include a hidden conversion cost
Many crypto cards convert crypto into fiat at the moment of payment. In some cases, that conversion cost appears as a stated fee. In other cases, it sits inside the exchange rate itself.
That difference matters. A card may look cheap on paper, but the user may still pay more through the rate used to convert crypto into dollars, euros, or another currency.
So when comparing cards, users should not look only at the fee page. They should also look at how the provider handles conversion.
Foreign purchases can trigger FX fees
When a card is used in a different currency, foreign exchange fees can apply. That is common when users travel, shop on foreign websites, or withdraw cash abroad.
In some cases, the card network sets one rate and the issuer adds its own FX fee on top. That means the final cost can rise even when the transaction goes through normally.
This is one reason why cross border spending often costs more than a domestic purchase.
DCC is one of the clearest ways to overpay
Another common cost appears at the terminal. When a user pays abroad, the merchant or ATM may ask whether to charge the card in the user’s home currency instead of the local one. That is Dynamic Currency Conversion, or DCC.
It often looks convenient, but it usually costs more. BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, said consumers are financially worse off in “practically every single case” when they accept DCC. The same paper cited research showing DCC was on average 7.6% more expensive in one study, while the highest markup reached 12.4%.
So the cleaner option is usually the local currency, not the home currency shown on the screen.
A simple DCC example
|
Option |
What happens |
Typical result |
| Pay in your home currency through DCC | The merchant or ATM converts the purchase | Often a worse rate than letting the card network handle it |
| Pay in the local currency | The card network and issuer handle the conversion | Usually the more standard and lower cost route |
That difference may look small on one purchase. Still, it adds up across repeated payments and withdrawals. BEUC’s paper also found examples where payment markups in stores ranged from 2% to 5%, while ATM DCC increases ran from 2.6% to 12% in one dataset.
ATM withdrawals can stack several fees at once
Cash withdrawals are another area where costs can pile up fast. First, the ATM operator may charge its own fee. Then the card issuer may add a withdrawal fee. If the withdrawal is in a foreign currency, an FX fee may apply as well.
So one ATM transaction can combine several charges in a single step. That is why withdrawing cash is often one of the more expensive ways to use a crypto card.
Users should check both the card provider’s fee schedule and the ATM screen before confirming the transaction.
Card holds are not fees, but they still affect spending
Not every unexpected charge is a fee. Hotels, fuel stations, car rentals, and some online merchants often place a temporary hold on the card before the final charge settles.
That hold reduces the available balance for a period of time. Later, the merchant posts the final amount and releases the unused part.
So while a hold is not a direct cost, it can still confuse users and make the card balance look lower than expected.
Other small charges can still matter
Some crypto cards also charge for physical card shipping, replacement cards, premium plans, or inactivity. These costs are not the same across the market, so they should not be treated as universal.
That is why the fee page matters as much as the headline promise. A provider may advertise low spending fees while charging in other places.
In short, the total cost depends on the full structure, not one line in the marketing copy.
What cost can look like in practice
A user may pay one fee to move crypto onchain, another cost through the conversion rate, another fee on a foreign purchase, and another markup if DCC is accepted by mistake. Then, if the same user withdraws cash abroad, ATM and FX charges may come on top.
KAST’s public fee page offers one example of how that structure can work. It says non-USD card purchases carry a foreign exchange fee of 0.5% to 1.75%, depending on the countries involved. It also says ATM withdrawals cost $3 plus 2% of the withdrawal amount, with the same 0.5% to 1.75% FX fee added for non-USD withdrawals.
That example does not make crypto cards unusually expensive. It simply shows that the total cost often comes from several layers, not one headline fee.
If you want to see how a real fee schedule is laid out before you travel or spend abroad, take a minute to explore KAST.
The main point on cost
Crypto cards are easier to understand when each cost is separated clearly. The main ones to watch are network fees, conversion costs, FX fees, DCC markups, ATM charges, and temporary holds.
Among them, DCC remains one of the clearest traps because it can make a transaction more expensive without adding any real benefit for the cardholder. BEUC’s findings underline that point.
So the simplest rule is this: check how the card handles conversion, read the fee page before using it abroad, and choose the local currency when a terminal gives you the choice.
-
NewsBeat7 days agoSteven Gerrard disagrees with Gary Neville over ‘shock’ Chelsea and Arsenal claim | Football
-
Business7 days agoNo Jackpot Winner and $194 Million Prize Rolls Over
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Business5 days agoExpert Picks for Every Need
-
Business4 days agoThree Gulf funds agree to back Paramount’s $81 billion takeover of Warner, WSJ reports
-
Sports5 days agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Tech2 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Business4 days agoNo Jackpot Winner, Prize to Climb to $231 Million
-
Fashion3 days agoMassimo Dutti Offers Inspiration for Your Summer Mood Board
-
Fashion2 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Politics6 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | The quality of mercy
-
Business5 days agoAkebia Therapeutics, Inc. (AKBA) Discusses Pipeline Progress and Strategic Focus on Kidney Disease Treatments at R&D Day – Slideshow
-
Fashion7 days agoStatement Sunglasses: The Accessory Shaping Modern Fashion
-
Crypto World1 day agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Politics7 days agoEast Jerusalem Palestinian families eviction orders
-
Fashion7 days agoCoffee Break: Santa Croce Tote
-
Fashion7 days agoFor Love & Lemons’ Spring 2026 Line is for the Romantics
-
Politics7 days agoWhy so many children are now classified as ‘disabled’
-
Politics7 days agoNuclear rockets, moon bases and NASA’s Mars plan
-
Tech7 days agoThe Threadless Ball Screw Never Took Off, But Don’t Write It Off


You must be logged in to post a comment Login