Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Bitcoin and Ether ETFs Post $1.82B Outflows This Week

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ether (CRYPTO: ETH) ETFs listed in the United States faced renewed withdrawal pressure as market participants cooled on riskier assets amid mixed signals from macro and crypto-specific catalysts. Over a five-day window, investors pulled roughly $1.82 billion from spot BTC and ETH funds, with about $1.49 billion exiting Bitcoin ETFs and $327.1 million leaving Ether products, according to data tracked by Farside. The outflows aligned with a softer price backdrop for the two leading cryptocurrencies, which have traded lower as momentum waned after a prior rally. In the broader week, BTC and ETH declined by about 6.55% and 8.99%, respectively, placing them around $83,400 and $2,685 to end the period, per CoinMarketCap.

Key takeaways

  • US spot BTC ETFs recorded $1.49 billion in net outflows over five trading days, while spot ETH ETFs saw $327.10 million leave, signaling a broad retreat from near-term investor exposure to the assets.
  • Over the last week, Bitcoin and Ether fell 6.55% and 8.99%, with prices near $83,400 (BTC) and $2,685 (ETH) on the period’s close, underscoring a risk-off tilt despite recent recovery attempts.
  • On January 14, Bitcoin ETF inflows reached the year’s peak at $840.6 million, a day that preceded the Crypto Fear & Greed Index’s move to a Greed score of 61—the strongest sentiment reading of the year at that moment.
  • Analysts have framed the negative price action as possibly short-sighted, with ETF veteran Eric Balchunas arguing that the broader institutionalization narrative for BTC had been priced in too quickly and that the market may be underestimating the upside potential if demand eventually returns.
  • Meanwhile, traditional assets like gold and silver surged early in the week before reversing some gains, highlighting a cross-asset backdrop where crypto was contending with a broader risk-on/risk-off dynamic.
  • Industry observers like Matt Hougan suggested Bitcoin could move toward parabolic levels if sustained ETF demand materializes, underscoring the importance some investors place on product flows as a price driver.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH

Sentiment: Neutral

Price impact: Negative. Net ETF outflows coincided with softer spot prices for both leading cryptocurrencies, reinforcing a cautious near-term stance among investors.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold

Advertisement

Market context: The latest ETF flow data comes as the crypto market wrestles with liquidity dynamics, regulatory chatter, and evolving product structures. Flows into spot ETFs have long been watched as a proxy for retail and institutional willingness to accumulate, while macro narratives—ranging from technology adoption to risk-on sentiment—continue to shape price trajectories across digital assets.

Why it matters

The ebb and flow of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs serve as a practical gauge of demand from different investor cohorts. In the current cycle, persistent outflows can signal a broader risk-off handicap, particularly when futures-based or derivative exposure remains relatively robust by comparison. The January 14 influx into Bitcoin ETFs—recording $840.6 million—illustrates that fresh liquidity can still surface even as overall flows pull back, suggesting a bifurcated market where a subset of participants remains inclined to allocate capital to physical- or spot-backed vehicles.

Analysts have pointed to sentiment indicators as important contextual signals. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index reached a year-to-date high of Greed 61 on the strength of that inflow, illustrating a momentary optimism that contrasts with the back-of-house data showing ongoing outflows in spot products. Eric Balchunas, whose commentary often threads through ETF discourse, argued that the negative reaction to Bitcoin’s price action versus gold and silver was “very short-sighted,” noting that BTC’s late-2023 and 2024 performance had already showcased resilience after a difficult stretch. He emphasized that institutional dynamics had at times been priced in ahead of actual developments, a theme he reiterated in discussions around ETF adoption and the evolving narrative around BTC’s mainstream maturation.

The macro backdrop lent additional texture to the narrative. Gold and silver both hit notable highs earlier in the week—$5,608 for gold and $121 for silver—before retreating on Friday as a broader risk-off thread emerged. Gold dropped about 8% to $4,887, while silver slid roughly 27% to $84, underscoring that traditional safe-haven assets were not immune to the day’s volatility. In this environment, Bitcoin’s performance remains a focal point as market participants weigh the potential upside from new liquidity channels against the risk of further macro-induced downdrafts. Matt Hougan of Bitwise weighed in on the possibility of a parabolic run for Bitcoin if ETF demand persists over the longer horizon, highlighting how product infrastructure can influence price discovery when capital returns to the space.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • Follow net ETF flows in the coming weeks for BTC and ETH to see whether redemption pressures abate or accelerate, potentially signaling a shift in risk appetite.
  • Monitor regulatory discourse and potential clarifications around asset-class ETFs, including any comments or proposals tied to the CLARITY Act or similar policy developments that could impact institutional participation.
  • Track the Crypto Fear & Greed Index and other sentiment gauges for signs of a renewed appetite or renewed caution among a broader base of participants.
  • Observe price action around the key levels cited in recent weeks (approximately $83k for BTC and $2.6k for ETH) to determine whether the market tests prior majors or aides to bounce back.

Sources & verification

  • Farside ETF flow data for spot BTC and ETH products, including net outflows and inflows by day.
  • CoinMarketCap price data for BTC and ETH during the referenced period.
  • Crypto Fear & Greed Index (Alternative.me) readings associated with the January inflow.
  • Eric Balchunas’ X posts commenting on Bitcoin’s price action, sentiment, and institutionalization narrative.
  • Matt Hougan’s X post discussing Bitcoin’s potential parabolic move if ETF demand persists.

ETF flows weigh on BTC and ETH ETFs: market reaction and key details

In the United States, spot exposure to the two largest cryptocurrencies has remained a barometer for broader appetite among retail and institutional players. The latest data show that, over a five-day window, net withdrawals from BTC and ETH spot ETFs totaled approximately $1.82 billion. Of that total, Bitcoin-focused funds accounted for about $1.49 billion in redemptions, while Ether-focused products saw around $327.1 million exit, according to Farside’s dataset. This divergence mirrors a shared theme: risk-off sentiment that has lingered alongside a reticence to enter new long exposure, even as the underlying assets have displayed moments of resilience in other pockets of the market.

The price trajectory during the same window reflected that cautious stance. Bitcoin’s spot price retreat mirrored broader risk-off dynamics, with a seven-day drop of around 6.55%. Ether’s decline was steeper, at roughly 8.99% over seven days, leaving BTC near $83,400 and ETH near $2,685 at week’s end. The correlation between ETF flows and price action remains a matter of ongoing observation, but the data underscore that inflows into spot products can serve as a leading indicator of a renewed price tilt, while outflows tend to accompany consolidations or soft patches in the near term.

Conspicuously, the week also featured a rare moment of intensified liquidity in Bitcoin ETFs. On January 14, BTC ETFs logged their strongest daily inflow of 2026 at $840.6 million, a day that preceded a notable shift in sentiment as the Crypto Fear & Greed Index spiked to Greed 61—the year’s highest reading up to that point. The juxtaposition of that inflow with an ensuing pullback highlights the complexity of momentum in a market driven by both fundamental flows and sentiment cycles. As Balchunas noted, a portion of the negative sentiment surrounding Bitcoin’s recent moves appears to rest on a misread of how quickly the institutionalization narrative would translate into realized flows and price strength.

Beyond crypto-specific factors, traditional markets contributed to the backdrop. Gold and silver—often cited as cross-asset benchmarks for risk sentiment—also surged to all-time or near all-time highs earlier in the week, with gold touching a peak around $5,608 and silver around $121. Yet, by week’s end, prices drifted lower: gold fell 8% to approximately $4,887, and silver slipped roughly 27% to about $84. These moves underscore a landscape where crypto prices are increasingly influenced by a broad risk environment, even as some observers maintain that long-run demand for spot exposure could re-emerge should policy and product developments align with investor expectations.

Amid the debate on near-term direction, Bitwise’s Matt Hougan weighed in on the potential for a parabolic move if ETF demand endures. The comment reflects a long-standing view in certain corners of the market that institutional adoption could act as a powerful catalyst for BTC’s price trajectory, particularly if new funds and products unlock meaningful retail and high-net-worth participation. While the immediate term remains volatile, proponents of deeper ETF participation argue that a renewed wave of inflows would provide an important structural pillar for price discovery in the spot market.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Tom Lee’s BitMine Hosts Its Largest Corporate Event, Will Stock React?

Published

on

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on April 9, but the stock dropped nearly 2% despite an announcement of a $4 billion buyback.

The transition from the NYSE American to the main NYSE board marks the Ethereum-focused treasury firm’s largest corporate event to date.

BitMine Lands on NYSE, Expands Buyback to $4 Billion

Chairman Thomas “Tom” Lee confirmed the uplisting on April 9. BMNR ceased trading on the NYSE American after-market on April 8 and opened on the main board the following morning.

Alongside the move, BitMine’s board unanimously approved a fourfold expansion of its 2025 share repurchase program. The authorization grew from $1 billion to $4 billion, ranking it among the 10 largest buyback announcements in 2026, according to Fundstrat data.

“There may be a time in the future when Bitmine shares are trading below intrinsic value, and the Company wants to be in a position to accretively retire common shares,” read an excerpt in the announcement.

Repurchases will continue under existing terms through open market transactions via Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

4.8 Million ETH and a 5% Supply Target

As of this writing, BitMine held approximately 4.803 million Ethereum tokens valued at roughly $10.6 billion at current prices near $2,218.

Ethereum Treasury Holdings
Ethereum Treasury Holdings. Source: Coingecko

That position represents 3.98% of total ETH supply, putting the firm over 79% toward its stated “Alchemy of 5%” accumulation target.

Despite these figures, BMNR stock slid from a previous close of $21.52, dipping as low as $20.50 during the session before partially recovering.

Advertisement

The muted reaction signals that investors may have already priced in the uplisting news, which BitMine first disclosed on April 6.

BMNR Price Performance
BMNR Price Performance. Source: TradingView

BitMine counts ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood, Founders Fund, Pantera Capital, and Galaxy Digital among its institutional backers.

The post Tom Lee’s BitMine Hosts Its Largest Corporate Event, Will Stock React? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Securitize names ex-SEC official Brett Redfearn as president ahead of public listing

Published

on

Securitize names ex-SEC official Brett Redfearn as president ahead of public listing

Securitize has appointed former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) official Brett Redfearn as president and a member of its board, adding regulatory experience as the firm prepares to go public this year.

Redfearn, who previously led the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, will work with Securitize’s leadership team to scale its offerings across issuance, trading and fund administration, the company announced in a press release. The company focuses on turning traditional financial assets, such as funds or private credit, into blockchain-based tokens that can be traded more easily.

His appointment comes at a time when tokenization is gaining traction among large financial firms. Banks and asset managers are testing ways to move assets onto blockchain rails in an effort to speed up settlement and widen access to investors.

Securitize is positioning itself as a regulated bridge between those institutions and digital asset infrastructure. The hire adds weight to Securitize’s leadership as it prepares for a proposed public listing through a business combination with Cantor Equity Partners II. It also reflects a broader trend of firms bringing in former regulators to navigate a complex policy environment.

Advertisement

“Brett has been instrumental in how modern markets are structured and regulated,” Securitize co-founder and CEO Carlos Domingo said in a statement. “He is deeply familiar with our business, leadership team, and long-term vision.”

Redfearn brings experience from both traditional finance and crypto. Before joining Securitize, he founded Panorama Financial Markets Advisory, advising exchanges and asset managers. He also served as head of capital markets at Coinbase (COIN), where he worked on expanding institutional participation in digital assets. Prior to joining the SEC, Redfearn was at JP Morgan for over a dozen years.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

BlackRock Crypto Cuts Ethereum Staking Fee to 18%: Too Cheap to Ignore?

Published

on

BlackRock Crypto Cuts Ethereum Staking Fee to 18%: Too Cheap to Ignore?

BlackRock crypto just moved on Ethereum staking fees, and the number is 18%. The world’s largest asset manager has set its commission on gross staking rewards at 18% inside its iShares Staked Ethereum Trust, a fresh product that launched March 12 under the ticker ETHB, layered on top of a 0.25% annual management fee.

That dual-fee structure is already attracting fire from advisors and institutional allocators who built their models around simpler cost assumptions.

The trust holds $318 million in staked ETH as of publication, with the 18% staking commission split with Coinbase as custodian and validator operator.

At current ETH staking yields of roughly 2.74%, that commission alone translates to approximately 49 basis points of clipped return – before the sponsor fee touches the NAV.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

Advertisement

Will the Blackrock Ethereum Staking ETF Fee War Hit the Same Floor as Bitcoin?

Bitcoin ETF fees fell to zero in just 12 months. The largest issuers temporarily waived management fees entirely just to grab AUM, borrowing the index fund playbook and compressing margins until custody costs were practically the product.

The question now hanging over Ethereum staking ETFs is whether the same gravity applies – or whether staking complexity creates a structural floor that protects issuer margins.

The uncomfortable truth is that staking ETFs are operationally heavier than spot bitcoin products. Issuers must manage validator economics, slash risk exposure, define MEV extraction mechanics, and build reward distribution infrastructure, none of which is free.

Advertisement

BlackRock’s ETHB charges 0.25% on assets, the same rate as its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), but the 18% staking commission is a fundamentally different fee model with no direct parallel in the bitcoin ETF market.

ETH Staking Rewards Reference Rate / Source: TheBlock

Fidelity’s competing staking product sits at roughly 10% on rewards – a gap that makes BlackRock look expensive by 800 basis points on the commission line alone.

Tyrone Ross, CEO of Turnqey Financial, said plainly: “To me it was always about a fee grab. It was always about the big banks and the big funds packaging this up and hitting retail investors with fees.” Ethan Buchman, co-founder of Cosmos, takes a longer view – he expects the 18% rate to compress toward 15% or even 10% as competition intensifies, mirroring bitcoin ETF erosion.

But Harriet Browning, VP of Sales at Twinstake, warned that aggressive fee compression carries a hidden cost: providers cutting corners on security and validator transparency to protect margins. Those two realities coexist, and neither cancels out the other.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Advertisement

LiquidChain Targets Early Mover Upside

LiquidChain is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer — fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment.

The architecture centers on four pillars: a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once system that lets developers access all three ecosystems without rebuilding for each chain.

The project has been gaining visibility as institutional capital flows accelerate into L3 infrastructure. The presale is currently priced at $0.01447, with $646,857.56 raised to date. Presale-stage assets carry meaningful risk — liquidity is thin and execution is unproven. That caveat stands.

Advertisement

But for traders mapping the next cycle’s infrastructure layer, LiquidChain.

The post BlackRock Crypto Cuts Ethereum Staking Fee to 18%: Too Cheap to Ignore? appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump’s World Liberty Financial borrowed millions from a protocol its own advisor co-founded

Published

on

Trump's World Liberty Financial borrowed millions from a protocol its own advisor co-founded

World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture co-founded by the Trump family, has executed a series of transactions through decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol Dolomite that raises questions about insider access, circular token economics, and concentrated risk to other depositors.

Onchain records analyzed by CoinDesk, sourced from Etherscan, Arkham and publicly accessible wallet data, show the sequence began on Feb. 8, when WLFI’s treasury deposited 14 million USD1, its own dollar-pegged stablecoin, into Dolomite as collateral and borrowed 11.4 million USDC against it.

Minutes later, 11.45 million USDC moved to a Coinbase Prime deposit address, per Arkham. Two days later, 12.5 million USD1 was sent from the treasury to a separate Coinbase Prime deposit address. Coinbase Prime is typically used for converting crypto to fiat or for institutional OTC trading.

That 12.5 million USD1 was not borrowed from Dolomite. It moved directly from WLFI’s treasury wallet to the exchange, meaning the venture sent its own stablecoin straight to a fiat off-ramp.

Advertisement

But the WLFI token entered the picture twelve days later. On Feb. 20, the treasury deposited 890 million WLFI into Dolomite and borrowed 20 million USD1 against it.

On March 24, another 1.1 billion WLFI followed. In total, 1.99 billion WLFI tokens now sit as collateral inside Dolomite, and the treasury has received roughly 31.4 million in stablecoins from the protocol across both episodes.

The choice of protocol is not incidental, however.

Dolomite co-founder Corey Caplan is an advisor to World Liberty Financial. WLFI now sits at the top of Dolomite’s supplied-assets list with $458.9 million in supply liquidity, roughly 55% of the protocol’s entire $835.7 million total.

Advertisement

The structural concern sits in Dolomite’s USD1 pool. USD1, which now has $4.6 billion in circulation, ranks second on the protocol with $180 million supplied against $167.5 million borrowed, a utilization ratio of about 93%.

The USD1 supply rate sits at 16.24% and the borrow rate at 9.18%, figures that reflect concentrated borrowing activity rather than broad organic demand.

At that utilization, ordinary depositors who lent USD1 to the pool expecting to withdraw at will cannot all do so at once. Their funds are effectively locked until the large borrower repays.

The collateral backing the WLFI-denominated borrow is a separate problem.

Advertisement

WLFI trades with limited market depth relative to the size of the position. If the token moves sharply lower and Dolomite’s liquidation mechanism triggers, the forced sale would crash the price before the collateral could be unwound, leaving the protocol holding bad debt that would fall on the same retail depositors who currently cannot exit.

Activity escalated in April through a different route. On April 2, the WLFI treasury sent 2 billion WLFI to a Gnosis Safe proxy wallet at address 0x44a681DD. Five days later, it sent another 1 billion.

Neither transfer went directly to Dolomite, and onchain data does not yet show where those tokens are headed. The three billion additional tokens are worth roughly $266 million at WLFI’s current price of $0.0888.

World Liberty Financial did not immediately respond to CoinDesk’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Yuga Settles Bored Ape NFT Trademark Lawsuit with Artist Ryder Ripps

Published

on

Yuga Settles Bored Ape NFT Trademark Lawsuit with Artist Ryder Ripps

Yuga Labs has reached a settlement in its NFT counterfeiting lawsuit against artist Ryder Ripps and his business partner Jeremy Cahen, with parties agreeing to permanent blocks on trademark and imagery use.

Yuga Labs has settled its NFT counterfeiting lawsuit against artist Ryder Ripps and business partner Jeremy Cahen. The parties have filed proposed orders to permanently block Ripps and Cahen from using Yuga’s imagery and trademarks, according to Reuters, citing court documents.

The settlement concludes the legal dispute over alleged unauthorized use of Yuga’s intellectual property, namely involving its Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) collection. Terms of the settlement have not been disclosed beyond the trademark and imagery restrictions outlined in the proposed court orders.

Sources: Reuters

Advertisement

This article was generated automatically by The Defiant’s AI news system from publicly available sources.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

BTC reverses early loss, rises above $72,000 on Middle East hopes

Published

on

Source: CoinDesk/TradingView

What appeared to be a down day in crypto markets has turned positive after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he told his cabinet to start negotiations with Lebanon as soon as possible. This came after NBC News reported that President Trump had requested Netanyahu scale back bombing in Lebanon as it threatened Monday’s announced ceasefire.

Bitcoin quickly rose about 3% as the news hit, now trading at $72,300, up 2% over the past 24 hours. U.S. stocks also reversed modest early losses, with the Nasdaq now ahead 0.65%. Having surged to nearly $103 per barrel earlier in the day, WTI crude oil quickly pulled back to $98.60.

Bitcoin is notably outperforming other crypto majors, with ether (ETH), solana (SOL) and XRP (XRP) all higher by less than 1%.

Continued divergence with software stocks

Firmly linked at the hip in recent months, bitcoin and software stocks continued to diverge on Thursday. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF (IGV) fell 4%, approaching a key support level around $76, a level it has tested and rebounded from multiple times.

Advertisement

Over the past month, bitcoin is up 9%, while IGV is down 12%.

On a 20-day moving average basis, the correlation coefficient between Bitcoin and IGV has dropped to a relatively low 0.34, reinforcing the recent divergence in their price movements.

Source: CoinDesk/TradingView

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

North Korean Cyber Spies Are No Longer Just Remote Threats

Published

on

North Korean Cyber Spies Are No Longer Just Remote Threats

This month’s $285 million exploit on Drift, a decentralized exchange (DEX), was the largest crypto hack in over a year, when exchange Bybit lost $1.4 billion. North Korean state-backed hackers were named as prime suspects in both attacks.

This past autumn, attackers posed as a quantitative trading firm and approached Drift’s protocol team in person at a major crypto conference, said Drift in an X post Sunday.

“It is now understood that this appears to be a targeted approach, where individuals from this group continued to deliberately seek out and engage specific Drift contributors, in person, at multiple major industry conferences in multiple countries over the following six months,” said the DEX.

Until now, North Korean cyber spies have targeted crypto firms online, through virtual calls and remote work. An in-person approach at a conference would not typically raise suspicion, but the Drift exploit should be enough for attendees to review connections made at recent events.

Advertisement
The hack cut Drift’s TVL by more than half in about 12 minutes. Source: DefiLlama

North Korea expands crypto playbook beyond hacks

Blockchain forensics firm TRM Labs described the incident as the largest DeFi hack of 2026 (so far) and the second-largest exploit in Solana’s history, just behind the $326 million Wormhole bridge hack in 2022.

The initial contact dates back about six months, but the exploit itself traces to mid-March, according to TRM. The attacker began by moving funds from Tornado Cash and deploying the CarbonVote Token (CVT), while using social engineering to persuade multisig signers to approve transactions that granted elevated permissions.

They then manufactured credibility for CVT by minting a large supply and inflating trading activity to simulate real demand. Drift’s oracles picked up the signal and treated the token as a legitimate asset.

When the pre-approved transactions were executed on April 1, CVT was accepted as collateral, withdrawal limits were increased and funds were withdrawn in real assets, including USDC.

TRM outlines funds moving from Tornado Cash in March used to prepare for the Drift exploit. Source: TRM Labs

Related: North Korean spy slips up, reveals ties in fake job interview

According to TRM, the speed and aggressiveness of the subsequent laundering exceeded that seen in the Bybit hack.

Advertisement

North Korea is widely believed to be using large-scale crypto thefts such as the Drift and Bybit attacks alongside longer-term tactics, including placing operatives in remote roles at tech and crypto firms to generate steady income. The United Nations Security Council has said such funds are used to support the country’s weapons program.

Security researcher Taylor Monahan said infiltration of DeFi protocols dates back to “DeFi summer,” adding that around 40 protocols have had contact with suspected DPRK operatives.

North Korean state media reported Thursday that the country tested an electromagnetic weapon and a short-range ballistic missile, known as the Hwasong-11, fitted with cluster munition warheads.

Estimated dimensions for the KN-23, also known as the Hwasong-11A. Source: Christian Maire, FRS

Infiltration network fuels steady crypto revenue

A separate investigation revealed how a network of North Korea-linked IT workers generated millions through prolonged infiltration.

Data obtained from an anonymous source shared by ZachXBT showed the network posing as developers and embedding themselves across crypto and tech firms, generating roughly $1 million a month and more than $3.5 million since November.

Advertisement

The group secured jobs using falsified identities, routed payments through a shared system, then converted funds to fiat and sent them to Chinese bank accounts via platforms such as Payoneer.

Wallet tracing linked part of the flow to addresses tied to known DPRK activity, the blockchain sleuth said. Source: ZachXBT

Related: Are you a freelancer? North Korean spies may be using you

The operation relied on basic infrastructure, including a shared website with a common password and internal leaderboards tracking earnings. 

The agents applied for roles in plain sight using VPNs and fabricated documents, pointing to a longer-term strategy of embedding operatives to extract steady revenue.

Defenses evolve as infiltration tactics spread

Cointelegraph encountered a similar scheme in a 2025 investigation led by Heiner García, who spent months in contact with a suspected operative.

Advertisement

Cointelegraph later took part in García’s dummy interview with a suspect who went by “Motoki,” who claimed to be Japanese. The suspect rage quit the call after failing to introduce himself in his supposed native dialect.

The investigation found operatives bypassed geographic restrictions by using remote access to devices physically located in countries such as the US. Instead of VPNs, they operated those machines directly, making their activity appear local.

By now, tech headhunters have realized that the person at the other end of a virtual job interview may indeed be a North Korean cyber spy. A viral defence strategy is to ask suspects to insult Kim Jong Un. So far, the tactic has been effective.

A suspected North Korean IT worker freezes when asked to call Kim Jong Un a “fat, ugly pig.” Source: Tanuki42

However, as Drift was approached in person and García’s findings showed operatives finding creative methods to bypass geographic restrictions, North Korean actors have continued to adapt to the cat-and-mouse dynamic.

Requesting interviewees to call North Korea’s supreme leader a “fat pig” is an effective strategy for the time being, but security researchers warn that this won’t work forever.

Advertisement

Magazine: Phantom Bitcoin checks, China tracks tax on blockchain: Asia Express