Crypto World
Bitcoin Bears Eye $50K Bottom as Analysts Warn One More Drawdown
Bitcoin enthusiasts and market observers are once again debating whether the flagship crypto will endure a final, liquidity-driven flush before any meaningful recovery takes hold. With price action mostly consolidating after recent swings, several prominent analysts say the path to a durable uptrend could still require a deeper test of support around the $50,000 region, even as episodic rallies surface on shifting macro news.
Key takeaways
- Several respected traders argue a final downside sweep toward roughly $50,000 could precede a lasting recovery, even as Bitcoin has shown intermittent strength in other macro setups.
- Despite a bounce to just under $75,000 linked to hopes for a US–Iran deal, the broader trend remains down according to noted analysts, who see any big bullish impulse as contingent on a shift in market structure and macro conditions.
- Chart patterns and cycle theory feature prominently: a bear-flag setup is still considered active by some analysts, suggesting further declines before a potential distribution phase and new accumulation.
- In the longer view, the market is wrestling with a different macro regime and a higher degree of institutional participation, factors that could blunt historic drawdown magnitudes in this cycle.
- Fidelity Digital Assets has cautioned that downside risk in 2026 may be less dramatic than in prior cycles, signaling a potentially more resilient macro-structure for Bitcoin amid ongoing adoption.
Bitcoin’s near-term trajectory: the debate among traders
Among the most vocal skeptics is Ivan Liljeqvist, the trader and author known for his social commentary on price action. In a recent post, he argued that Bitcoin has yet to witness a true “big flush,” suggesting that the market could test lower levels before a durable turn toward higher prices. His view centers on the idea that the current bounce strength is insufficient to mark the end of the bear phase, and that the downtrend remains intact.
“I don’t think we’ve had it yet, I don’t think $60,000 was the bottom. Trend is still down,” Liljeqvist wrote, underscoring the persistent breadth of selling pressure that has characterized this cycle. The implication for traders is straightforward: a mild rebound may prove unsustainable without accompanying macro or institutional shifts that breathe new life into demand at scale.
Another veteran observer, Merlijn Enkelaar, has framed Bitcoin’s path in a broader cycle view. He argues that the asset could be entering its second bear-market phase after a period of accumulation, with a potential “manipulation phase” pushing prices down toward the $50,000 region before a third, or distribution, phase takes hold. The framing implies a longer-than-expected consolidation period, punctuated by volatile drawdowns that shake out weaker hands and reset expectations for institutions stepping in later in the cycle.
“This could potentially set up for stronger bullish momentum once the flush concludes, but the institutionalization of crypto markets places consistent buying pressure at current levels.”
For Nick Ruck, director at LVRG Research, the narrative centers on accumulation zones and macro resilience. He interprets a move toward $50,000 as the last meaningful accumulation window before any sustained rebound, positioning it as a cyclic reset amid broader macro headwinds and capital rotation challenges. Ruck’s perspective highlights a tension in the market: while doom-oriented voices dominate headlines, a longer arc of accumulation could still unfold if non-price factors align in favorable ways.
From the charts to the macro matrix
The discussion isn’t confined to price psychology alone. The current debate sits at the intersection of chart-driven patterns and macro-market structure. On the chart, some analysts point to a bearish flag formation that remains “in play,” signaling continued downside pressure until a new balance is found. A bear-flag pattern has historically served as a continuation signal, suggesting the trend may extend lower before buyers re-emerge with conviction.
Even as some market players look for a bottoming signal, Bitcoin did experience a relief rally earlier in the month, climbing to just under $75,000. The move was attributed to renewed optimism over a potential Iran–U.S. deal, a development that temporarily lifted markets across risk-on assets. Yet the price action once again underlines the fragility of near-term resistance: even sharp intraday squeezes can be reversed if macro news reverts to risk-off concerns or if liquidity conditions tighten.
On the longer horizon, the drawdown history remains a salient reference point. The 2017 bear market retraced roughly 82% from its high, while the 2021 cycle saw about a 77% peak-to-trough decline. In light of those precedents, some observers concede that the current cycle may diverge from the textbook 60% drawdown baseline they had expected earlier in the year. As one analyst noted, the market environment today is macro-structured in a way that could limit such a clean retreat, complicating any attempt to predict an exact bottom or the pace of subsequent recovery.
Further nuance comes from Fidelity Digital Assets, which has recently argued that downside risk in 2026 could be less dramatic than in past cycles. The assessment points to a world in which institutions already possess deeper exposure to digital assets and where the macro backdrop—while still challenging—appears less prone to catastrophic, regime-shifting drawdowns for Bitcoin than during prior bear markets.
What to watch next in a market evolving under new dynamics
As the debate unfolds, several indicators could shape the next phase of Bitcoin’s cycle. First, the $50,000 region looms as a potential pivot point, especially if the market breaks decisively below key demand zones on high-volume selloffs. A decisive move through this level would not only test investor conviction but also influence the timing and scale of any subsequent accumulation by institutions or large holders.
Second, the pace of institutional participation continues to be a critical variable. If the market’s “institutionalization” indeed places steady buying pressure at current price levels, the upswing could be more gradual and less prone to sharp, V-shaped recoveries. In that context, traders may need to tolerate broader ranges and more pronounced drawdowns during the transition to a new cyclical phase.
Third, macro developments—ranging from geopolitical tensions to liquidity conditions and monetary policy signals—will continue to drive risk sentiment and cross-asset correlations. The ongoing sensitivity of Bitcoin to these macro factors reinforces the idea that price action alone cannot tell the full story of where the market is headed next. Investors and builders will want to monitor how the macro story evolves alongside on-chain activity and sector adoption, as those elements often feed into longer-term cycles more decisively than short-lived price spikes.
Finally, the market’s risk-reward calculus remains nuanced. While some traders anticipate a deeper flush, others point to the possibility of a measured, protracted recovery as institutions allocate capital to crypto-related strategies and products. In this tension lies the potential for a steadier ramp higher rather than an abrupt, speculative rally—an outcome that could align with a structurally improved macro environment and greater clarity around regulatory and custodial frameworks.
For readers and market participants, the near future will likely test these competing theses in real time. The immediate question remains whether Bitcoin can sustain any rally without revisiting the lower sub-50k zones, or whether a test of those levels becomes a necessary precondition for a durable breakout. As always, the answer will partly hinge on how the macro narrative unfolds and how patient capital responds to evolving price discovery signals.
As the year progresses, watchers should keep a close eye on price action around the 50,000 to 60,000 band, the behavior of large holders, and the tempo of institutional activity. The convergence—or divergence—of these factors will illuminate whether this cycle is on track for a traditional recovery arc or a more complex, protracted consolidation shaped by macro realities and market participants increasingly anchored to crypto markets.
Readers should watch the next price action and macro developments closely, as the coming weeks may determine whether Bitcoin breaks decisively toward a new regime or tests a deeper trough before gathering momentum for a broader, more sustainable upswing.
Ethereum price rose over 9% on Tuesday amid a broader market rally fueled by renewed hopes of a more stable U.S.-Iran ceasefire soon.
Summary
- Ethereum rose over 9% to a 10-week high of $2,393, driven by improving risk sentiment tied to a potential U.S.-Iran ceasefire.
- Strong institutional demand, including Bitmine’s continued ETH accumulation and $123.5M in short liquidations, supported the rally.
- A breakout from a descending channel signals a potential move toward $3,400, with $2,500 as the next key resistance level.
According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price rose 9.2% to a 10-week high of $2,393 on Tuesday, extending its gains to over 17% from its lowest point in a monthly period.
Ethereum price rebounded higher following Bitcoin’s footsteps and a rally across the entire crypto market as investor demand for risk assets increased after reports revealed that Iran could likely give up on its uranium enrichment plans to secure a deal with the U.S., putting more weight on a potential ceasefire that had previously been very shaky.
The largest altcoin by market cap has also benefited from aggressive buying by the Ethereum treasury company Bitmine.
Over the past week, Bitmine acquired another 71,524 ETH, bringing its total holdings to 4.875 million ETH, representing 4.04% of the total supply. According to the company’s chairman, Tom Lee, Ethereum could likely be in the final stages of the mini crypto winter. This suggests why the company has ramped up its ETH buying activity for the past 4 weeks and helped in stabilizing the asset’s floor price.
Moreover, over $123.5 million worth of short positions were liquidated from the altcoin futures market. This came as the sudden uptick in the altcoin’s price caught short sellers off guard, forcing them to buy back the asset to cover their losses.
On the daily chart, Ethereum price has confirmed breaking out of a descending parallel channel pattern that had been forming since early August 2025. Typically, a decisive breakout from the upper trendline of the pattern leads to an upside equal to the height of the channel itself.
Such a move would put the breakout target at $3,400, up nearly 42% from the current price level. The MACD lines have pointed upwards and have moved above the zero line, a sign that bullish momentum is returning. Meanwhile, the supertrend indicator remained in green for nearly a month.
For now, $2,500 remains the next major psychological resistance to watch. On the contrary, if its price dips back below $2,100, it could signal a return to the consolidation zone.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
A fake version of Ledger Live distributed via Apple’s App Store has been linked to at least $9.5 million in crypto theft, with victims now coming forward describing devastating losses, including entire retirement funds wiped out “in an instant.”
One victim, posting on X under the handle @glove, said he lost 5.9 BTC – his entire savings accumulated over a decade – after downloading what he believed was the official Ledger app while setting up a new computer.
“I lost my retirement fund in a hack/scam… All my BTC gone in an instant,” he wrote.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT later traced the stolen 5.92 BTC, showing it was rapidly funneled through a series of transactions into KuCoin deposit addresses, consistent with a broader laundering pattern identified across the incident.
Apple and KuCoin did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
$9.5 million stolen across chains
X user @glove wasn’t the only victim. The phishing campaign, active between April 7 and April 13, impacted more than 50 suspected victims across Bitcoin, Ethereum-compatible networks, Tron, Solana and XRP.
Three of the largest victims lost seven-figure sums, with $3.23 million in USDT being stolen on April 9, $2.08 million of USDC on April 11 and $1.95 million in BTC, ETH and stETH being drained on April 8.
Cases like this typically prompt victims to enter their recovery phrase on an app, giving attackers full access to their wallets.
Laundering via KuCoin and ‘AudiA6’
Stolen funds were routed through more than 150 KuCoin deposit addresses and tied to “AudiA6,” a centralized crypto mixing service known for charging high fees to obfuscate illicit flows.
The reliance on a centralized exchange as a laundering hub is notable given KuCoin’s recent regulatory troubles. The exchange was barred from onboarding new EU users by Austrian regulators in February 2026, just months after receiving a MiCA license, and previously paid over $300 million to U.S. authorities to settle anti-money laundering violations in 2025.
App Store scrutiny
Apple removed the fake Ledger Live app from the App Store, but questions remain about how it passed review and how long it was available.
The scale of losses, coupled with the fact that the app was distributed through Apple’s official marketplace, could expose the company to legal risk, with ZachXBT suggesting the incident may form the basis for a class-action lawsuit.
Rising threat
The incident highlights a persistent threat that has marred the crypto industry over the past few years. In 2025 crypto investors lost around $17 billion to hacks and scams, with social engineering and phishing tactics leading the way in terms of attack vectors.
For victims, the damage is already done.
“I worked ten years for this,” the victim wrote. “Be careful out there.”
Key Takeaways
- Q1 2026 earnings release scheduled for April 16, pre-market hours.
- Options market pricing indicates potential 4.3% price swing post-announcement.
- Analyst consensus projects $1.55 earnings per share (approximately 5% YoY growth) with $18.95 billion in revenue.
- UBS maintains Buy rating with $186 price objective; Bank of America holds at $173.
- Shares have climbed roughly 9% in 2026, with forward P/E ratio at 17.93x.
PepsiCo is set to unveil its first-quarter 2026 financial results on April 16 during pre-market trading hours. The options market suggests investors are bracing for a 4.3% movement in share price following the announcement.
This anticipated volatility falls short of PEP’s four-quarter average post-earnings movement of 5.4%, indicating relatively subdued market expectations for the upcoming release.
Shares have rallied approximately 9% since the start of 2026, significantly outpacing the S&P 500’s 2.2% decline during the identical timeframe. Currently trading at $157.06, the stock has climbed 23% from its 52-week bottom of $127.60.
Analysts are projecting quarterly earnings of $1.55 per share, representing approximately 5% expansion compared to last year’s $1.48 figure. Top-line expectations stand at $18.95 billion, suggesting roughly 6% year-over-year advancement.
PepsiCo has surpassed profit projections in all four previous quarters, delivering an average upside surprise of 1.2%. Zacks research indicates a modest Earnings ESP of +0.03% combined with a Hold classification, sufficient criteria for predicting another potential beat.
Spotlight on North American Operations
The PepsiCo Foods North America (PFNA) division represents the critical area of focus for investors. This segment has faced challenges from weakening demand volumes and intensifying competitive dynamics, prompting leadership to implement strategic price reductions on flagship products while emphasizing value positioning.
Market participants are eager to identify early indicators that these strategic adjustments are producing results. Additional attention will center on the Beverages North America unit, which is pursuing its sixth consecutive year of core operating margin improvement.
Trade policy uncertainties and raw material expenses present genuine obstacles. UBS equity analyst Peter Grom, maintaining a Buy recommendation with a $186 valuation target, indicated he wouldn’t be caught off guard if full-year projections shift toward the conservative end of management’s range due to currency fluctuations and inflationary pressures.
Grom acknowledged that certain market participants harbor skepticism regarding whether PEP’s strategic pricing adjustments and product innovation initiatives will generate sustainable momentum in North American markets. Despite these concerns, he maintains a constructive view on the risk-reward profile at present valuation levels.
Wall Street Perspectives Diverge
Bank of America analyst Peter Galbo sustained his Hold stance with a $173 valuation objective. His quarterly earnings forecast remains at $1.53 per share, with full-year expectations at $8.60. Galbo has adjusted his model to reflect an anticipated reduction in effective tax rate alongside elevated selling, general and administrative expenses during the first half of 2026.
His primary areas of examination for the quarterly report include: operational ramifications from Middle Eastern geopolitical tensions, progress on PFNA transformation strategies, and management commentary regarding Beverages North America expansion initiatives.
The Street’s aggregate position on PEP registers as Moderate Buy, comprising seven Buy recommendations against eight Hold ratings. The mean price objective of $173.36 suggests approximately 11% appreciation potential from current trading levels.
PEP’s forward price-to-earnings multiple stands at 17.93x, positioned below both the S&P 500’s 21.33x and the industry average of 18.88x. The equity also offers a dividend yield of 3.65%.
PepsiCo has relaunched four flagship brands — Lay’s, Tostitos, Gatorade and Quaker — featuring refreshed marketing campaigns and streamlined ingredient formulations as components of a comprehensive portfolio modernization strategy entering 2026.
Crypto World
Marvell (MRVL) Stock Surges to New Peak Fueled by AWS Partnership and Optical Network Boom
Key Takeaways
- MRVL shares rose 2.2% to $131.28, achieving back-to-back record closing prices for the first time since January 2025
- Amazon’s $20B annual AI processor revenue stream bolsters investor confidence in Marvell’s partnership
- Earlier 2025 selloff sent MRVL plunging over 50% to approximately $50 amid concerns over Amazon Trainium contract
- Barclays projects Marvell’s optical networking segment could expand up to 90% annually through 2026
- B. Riley analysts lifted their MRVL price objective to $156 from $135, reaffirming Buy stance
Marvell Technology shares have experienced a remarkable turnaround following a turbulent period, with the semiconductor company posting a fresh all-time closing high. On Monday, MRVL finished trading at $131.28, representing a 2.2% gain and marking the second straight session at record levels since the start of 2025, based on Dow Jones Market Data.
Marvell Technology, Inc., MRVL
The recovery narrative for this chipmaker has been dramatic. During early 2025, MRVL experienced a brutal decline exceeding 50% from peak valuations, bottoming near the $50 mark amid widespread speculation that the company might forfeit its contract designing Amazon’s advanced Trainium artificial intelligence processors.
Those concerns have now largely evaporated. Financial analysts across Wall Street show growing conviction that Marvell will maintain its strategic position within Amazon’s AI semiconductor ecosystem.
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy revealed during recent statements that the tech giant’s internally developed AI chip operations have already reached $20 billion in yearly revenue, with plans to expand external sales of these processors. This disclosure provided substantial validation for investors backing Marvell’s prospects.
KeyBanc’s analyst John Vinh maintains an Overweight recommendation with a $130 price objective on the shares. His outlook anticipates Marvell’s upcoming quarterly results, scheduled for early June release, will modestly surpass Wall Street consensus estimates.
“We expect Marvell to post slightly better results and slightly higher guidance, driven by continued outsized data center demand across both traditional and AI workloads, including hyperscaler AI ASICs (Trainium) and optical networking,” Vinh wrote in a Sunday research note.
Optical Networking Provides Additional Momentum
Separate from its Amazon relationship, Marvell is experiencing substantial tailwinds from its optical networking operations. As artificial intelligence data facilities scale upward in both size and sophistication, these centers require optical transceivers capable of transmitting information at higher speeds with greater efficiency by transforming electrical impulses into optical signals.
Marvell manufactures the digital signal processors embedded within these transceivers — representing a specialized yet critical component of AI infrastructure buildout. Barclays analyst Tom O’Malley recently elevated MRVL to Overweight status and forecasts the company’s optical networking revenues could surge as much as 90% during both this year and next.
Such aggressive growth estimates capture market attention. The optical networking segment has emerged as a quietly significant theme within the broader AI investment narrative.
Analyst Price Objectives Trending Upward
B. Riley increased its MRVL price target to $156 from $135 on Monday while keeping its Buy recommendation intact. The firm pointed to Taiwan Semiconductor’s March sales figures as providing favorable indications for Marvell’s first quarter and early second quarter performance.
TSMC’s supply chain metrics offered analysts enhanced visibility into semiconductor demand patterns industry-wide, with the implications for Marvell appearing constructive.
Marvell shares have more than doubled over the trailing twelve months, despite the sharp downturn experienced during early 2025.
The early June earnings announcement will serve as the next critical catalyst. Market watchers will scrutinize commentary regarding both the Trainium partnership status and optical networking revenue trajectory.
B. Riley’s updated $156 target exceeds the current trading level, suggesting potential upside should the bullish momentum persist.
Web3 projects lost $464.5 million to hacks and scams in the first quarter of 2026, while multi-billion-dollar “mega hacks” gave way to a larger number of mid-sized incidents, according to blockchain security company Hacken.
According to Hacken’s Q1 2026 report, phishing and social engineering attacks dominated the period, accounting for $306 million in losses in a quarter that saw 43 incidents overall. A single $282 million hardware wallet scam in January was responsible for 81% of the quarter’s damage.
Smart contract exploits totaled $86.2 million, with access control failures, including compromised keys and cloud services, driving an additional $71.9 million in losses.
The losses place this quarter as the second-lowest first quarter since 2023, with the absence of a single mega hack on the scale of Bybit, which lost $1.46 billion in Q1 2025, the primary driver of the year-over-year decline.
Hacken’s incident mapping shows the largest failures increasingly occurring outside onchain code, in operational and infrastructure layers that traditional audits rarely touch. Yev Broshevan, chief executive and co-founder at Hacken, told Cointelegraph the most expensive failures “happen outside the code layer entirely.”
Related: Aethir halts bridge exploit, promises compensation after $90K loss
According to Hacken, that shift is drawing greater scrutiny from regulators and institutional counterparties, with frameworks such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) in the European Union moving further into enforcement and raising expectations around continuous security monitoring and incident response.
Legacy code, fake VC calls and key compromises
Broshevan pointed to $306 million in phishing, a $40 million North Korea-linked fake venture capitalist (VC) call against Step Finance, and a $25 million AWS key management service compromise at Resolv Labs. Even where smart contracts were at fault, the costliest bugs often sat in legacy deployments and known vulnerability classes. Truebit lost $26.4 million to a bug in a Solidity contract deployed around five years ago, while Venus Protocol was hit by a donation attack pattern documented since 2022.
Six audited projects, including Resolv with 18 audits and Venus with five separate firms, still accounted for $37.7 million in losses. On average, that was more than their unaudited peers because higher total value locked (TVL) protocols attract more sophisticated attackers and exploits.
Global watchdogs harden incident response expectations
In Q1, MiCA and DORA in the EU shifted further into active enforcement, Dubai’s regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, tightened expectations around its Technology and Information Rulebook, Singapore enforced Basel-aligned capital and one-hour incident notification rules, and the United Arab Emirates’ new Capital Market Authority took over federal digital asset oversight with broader powers and higher penalties.
Related: Crypto hackers steal $169M from 34 DeFi protocols in Q1: DefiLlama
Hacken ties those regimes to a new benchmark for “regulator-ready” stacks that includes proof-of-reserves attestations backed by daily internal reconciliation, 24/7 onchain monitoring across treasury wallets and privileged roles, automated circuit-breakers on minting and governance functions and incident notification clocks calibrated to the strictest applicable standard.
The report highlights “realistic” targets of awareness within 24 hours, labeling within four hours, and blocking in 30 seconds, with “aspirational” goals as low as 10 minutes for detection and 1 second to block, based on guidance from Global Ledger’s 2025 Laundering Race data.
At the human layer, Hacken flags North Korean clusters as the most consistent operational threat, with Step Finance’s $40 million loss and Bitrefill’s infrastructure breach extending a playbook of fake VC outreach, malicious video call tooling and compromised employee endpoints that extracted roughly $2.04 billion from the sector in 2025.
Magazine: XRP yet to ‘price in’ 3 bullish catalysts, Bitcoin to $80K? Trade Secrets
Bitcoin is pressing up against $75,000, a price it has repeatedly failed to surpass since early February, putting the broader crypto market on breakout watch after more than two months of range-bound trading.
Traders have been building short positions around that level, betting on another rejection. Data from CoinGlass shows roughly $200 million in shorts would be liquidated if BTC pushes above $75,500 — a dynamic that could accelerate any upside move.
At the same time, macroeconomic sentiment is improving. U.S. equities rallied Monday, with the S&P 500 index posting its highest close since before the Iran conflict escalated, after President Donald Trump signaled willingness to strike a deal with Tehran.
Precious metals also made a comeback on Tuesday with silver rallying by 2.9% since midnight UTC while gold added 0.7% to $4,775 per ounce.
Derivatives positioning
- Notional open interest (OI) in crypto futures rose to $126 billion, the most since Jan. 31, according to Coinglass.
- Ether’s OI surged to 14.99 million ETH ($35.79 billion), the highest since July. The growth likely stems from increased demand for bullish bets because the 24-hour cumulative volume delta (CVD) is positive, indicating that aggressive buying is dominating the flow. Positive funding rates also suggest the same.
- Bitcoin OI has surged to a record high of 767,000 BTC, while positive CVD and funding rates also signal bullish positioning.
- ZEC, SOL and HYPE are other notable coins displaying bullish patterns.
- It’s worth noting that while funding rates are positive for most tokens, they are not unusually high. This is a sweet spot for a grind higher, and indicates that the market is not overheated.
- However, the 30-day implied volatility (IV) indexes for bitcoin and ether, BVIV and EVIV, have stopped declining over the past two days. Until recently, the spot-price rally was accompanied by falling IV, a dynamic that has now shifted, with IV stabilizing even as prices continue to rise. If this divergence persists or widens, it could raise questions about the sustainability of the price gains.
- Data from Deribit shows that dealer gamma positioning is deeply negative at $75,000. So, if BTC rises past this level, dealers could buy into the rising market to hedge their exposure back to neutral. This could accelerate the uptrend. Similarly, if prices turn lower from $75,000, dealers could sell into a falling market, accelerating the decline.
- Bitcoin puts remain pricier than calls across all time frames, risk reversals show. In ether’s case, the sentiment has flipped bullish in favor of calls in short-term expiries. The long-end continues to show a bias for puts.
Token talk
- The altcoin market is taking a back seat for Tuesday’s breakout attempt, with the bitcoin-dominant CoinDesk 5 (CD5) and CoinDesk 20 (CD20) indexes posting gains of 0.5%-0.7% since midnight, beating the benchmarks weighted toward altcoins.
- Ether (ETH) is up by 0.7% since midnight, beating majors XRP and SOL, which are down by 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively. ADA lost 2.2% overnight.
- Memecoins BONK, FLOKI and WIF have cooled after a sector-wide rally on Monday, each losing between 2.4% and 3% since midnight as traders focus on the potential bitcoin breakout.
- Ethena (ENA) gained 5.6% over the past 24 hours, before giving back 4% during Asian and European hours.
- The altcoin market is delicately poised. If bitcoin breaks above $75,000 and consolidates, fresh capital will rotate into more speculative bets. For now the focus is on BTC.
A key development on 13 April was the start of a naval blockade of Iranian ports, a direct consequence of the collapse of negotiations in Islamabad on 12 April. The blockade covers all vessels entering and leaving Iranian ports in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. Around 20% of global natural gas trade passes through the Strait of Hormuz, and the renewed escalation has once again heightened risks to global LNG supplies. European TTF has previously reacted with sharp widening spreads during earlier flare-ups, while the Asian JKM benchmark also remains sensitive to regional disruptions.
Against this backdrop, natural gas as an asset class is caught between two opposing forces: a geopolitical risk premium is providing price support at the global level, while a structural supply surplus — record production, accelerated injections into storage, and an unusually warm spring in the Northern Hemisphere — is weighing on prices from a fundamental perspective.
Technical picture
On the daily chart of XNGUSD, the move from the December 2025 high near 5.200 remains downward but structurally uneven: the sequence of interim highs and lows does not form a classic trending impulse. Volatility is compressing, and each rebound is shorter than the previous one, indicating a gradual loss of selling momentum as price approaches a key support level. Quotes are now trading close to the psychological 2.600 level, which has acted as an important reference point since late 2024.
The volume profile shows a Point of Control (POC) in the 3.150–3.200 range, where the bulk of trading activity is concentrated. This zone acts as the first major barrier to any recovery. The 3.400 level remains the next significant resistance above.
The RSI with Moving Averages reads 34 / 40 / 42, with all three metrics remaining below the neutral 50 level and the moving averages pointing lower, signalling continued downside pressure.
Summary
Natural gas prices are approaching the key psychological level of 2.600, the lower boundary of a consolidation range that has been in place since late 2024, while the blockade of Iranian ports keeps global energy markets in a state of heightened uncertainty. The RSI with Moving Averages remains below the neutral threshold across all three readings.
Start trading commodity CFDs with tight spreads (additional fees may apply). Open your trading account now or learn more about trading commodity CFDs with FXOpen.
This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
In decentralized finance, everyone talks about yield, liquidity, and tokenomics—but almost no one talks about time. Yet beneath the surface, a silent battle is unfolding. Not for users. Not for tokens.
But for milliseconds.
Welcome to the latency wars—where speed isn’t just an advantage… It’s alpha.
Speed Is No Longer a Feature—It’s a Weapon
In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions shaving microseconds off execution time. DeFi is now heading down the same path—just dressed in smart contracts and liquidity pools.
Here’s the brutal reality:
- The faster your transaction executes, the better your price
- The earlier you interact with liquidity, the higher your yield
- The quicker you react to market signals, the more edge you capture
In a permissionless system, speed becomes the closest thing to an unfair advantage.
Faster Execution = Better Yield
Yield in DeFi isn’t static—it’s constantly shifting.
Opportunities like:
- Liquidations
- Arbitrage gaps
- Yield farming rewards
…are often claimed in seconds.
If your transaction arrives late:
- The liquidation has already taken place
- The arbitrage is already closed
- The yield is already diluted
Speed determines who gets paid—and who gets leftovers.
This is why advanced players invest in:
- Private RPC endpoints
- Optimized gas strategies
- Transaction bundling
- MEV-aware routing
Because in DeFi, being right isn’t enough—you have to be first.
Cross-Chain Latency Arbitrage
As DeFi expands across multiple chains, a new frontier has emerged: cross-chain latency arbitrage.
Prices don’t update instantly across ecosystems. That delay—sometimes just seconds—creates exploitable gaps.
Example:
- Asset price updates on Chain A
- Chain B lags behind
- Arbitrage bots exploit the difference before equilibrium returns
The profit window is tiny. The competition is brutal.
This has led to:
- Cross-chain bots operating 24/7
- Ultra-fast bridge monitoring systems
- Predictive routing based on latency patterns
It’s not just about where liquidity is anymore.
It’s about who reaches it first across chains.
The Infrastructure Arms Race
Behind every fast trade is a stack of invisible infrastructure.
We’re seeing an arms race across:
1. RPC Optimization
Custom nodes reduce lag and improve transaction broadcast speed.
2. Block Builders & MEV Relays
Specialized actors reorder transactions for optimal execution—sometimes capturing value before it even reaches the public mempool.
3. Geographic Advantage
Physical proximity to validators can shave off critical milliseconds.
4. Parallel Execution Chains
New blockchains are being designed specifically for speed—processing transactions simultaneously instead of sequentially.
Who Wins the Latency Wars?
Not necessarily the smartest.
Not even the most capitalized.
The winners are:
- The fastest infrastructure
- The best-connected systems
- The most optimized execution pipelines
This creates a subtle shift in DeFi’s philosophy.
What started as a level playing field is evolving into a system where:
- Technical edge = financial edge
- Infrastructure = strategy
- Speed = profit
The Trade-Off: Speed vs Fairness
There’s a growing tension at the heart of DeFi:
- Faster systems improve efficiency
- But they also centralize advantage
If only a handful of players can afford ultra-low latency infrastructure, the ecosystem risks drifting toward the same inequalities seen in traditional finance.
This raises big questions:
- Should DeFi optimize for fairness or efficiency?
- Can protocols be designed around latency advantages?
- Will new mechanisms (like fair ordering or batch auctions) rebalance the game?
Final Thought
DeFi isn’t just becoming a financial system.
It’s becoming a real-time competitive network—where capital moves like data, and milliseconds decide outcomes.
The next wave of innovation won’t just be about new protocols.
It will be about who can move fastest inside them.
Because in the hidden war for speed…
Time is the ultimate currency.
REQUEST AN ARTICLE
Hacken’s Q1 2026 security snapshot tallies $464.5 million in losses across 43 Web3 incidents, underscoring a shift in where attackers hit and how damage accumulates. The report highlights phishing and social-engineering campaigns as the dominant threat, totaling $306 million in losses for the quarter. A separate, highly disruptive incident—a $282 million hardware-wallet scam in January—was responsible for 81% of the quarter’s damage, according to Hacken. Smart-contract exploits reached $86.2 million, while access-control failures, including compromised keys and cloud-service breaches, accounted for $71.9 million. The quarter stands as the second-lowest first quarter since 2023, helped by the absence of a Bybit-scale mega hack that drove much of the year-ago decline.
Hacken’s chief executive and co-founder, Yev Broshevan, emphasized a notable trend: the costliest failures increasingly occur outside the code itself. “The most expensive failures happen outside the code layer entirely,” he told Cointelegraph, pointing to real-world weaknesses in operational and infrastructure layers that traditional code audits often miss.
For context, Hacken’s review arrives as regulators and institutional players sharpen expectations around security. The report notes that regulatory regimes such as the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) are moving from framework to enforcement, while regulators in the UAE, Singapore, and Dubai’s regulator, among others, tighten oversight and incident-response requirements. These shifts are shaping what Hacken calls “regulator-ready” security stacks that demand continuous monitoring and rapid containment measures.
Key takeaways
- $464.5 million in losses across 43 incidents in Q1 2026, with phishing/social engineering driving $306 million of that total. A single January incident of $282 million hardware-wallet theft accounted for a large share of the quarter’s damage.
- Smart-contract exploits totaled $86.2 million, while $71.9 million stemmed from access-control and compromised-key or cloud-service failures.
- The quarter marks the second-lowest first quarter since 2023, aided by the absence of a mega hack on the scale of Bybit’s 2025 incident.
- Attack patterns are shifting toward operational and infrastructure risk, reinforcing the view that audits of on-chain code alone are insufficient to measure a protocol’s security posture.
- Regulators are tightening expectations. MiCA, DORA, Dubai’s VARA, Singapore’s Basel-aligned requirements, and the UAE’s Capital Market Authority push for stronger incident reporting, continuous monitoring, and defined response timelines.
Operational risk dominates the early 2026 landscape
The Hacken analysis stresses a transition in the vulnerability ledger from purely on-chain code issues to failures rooted in operations and infrastructure. The most expensive losses, the report suggests, arise from misconfigurations, compromised credentials, and weak third-party integrations rather than only from bugged smart contracts. This is consistent with a broader industry message: a robust security program must cover people, processes, and technology in parallel with code audits.
Hacken’s interview with Broshevan reinforces this view: the most consequential incidents tend to emerge from non-contract layers, such as identity and access management, cloud configurations, and supply-chain dependencies. The result is a security problem that requires defense-in-depth measures that extend beyond formal audits of deployed code.
Legacy code and multi-year vulnerabilities persist
Even as the industry grapples with modern attack vectors, the report highlights several high-cost incidents rooted in legacy deployments or well-known vulnerability patterns. Notably, a $26.4 million loss at Truebit stemmed from a Solidity contract bug deployed roughly five years ago. Venus Protocol faced a donation-style attack that exploited long-standing patterns around contract governance. In another example, a $40 million loss occurred via a North Korea-linked fake venture-capital outreach targeting Step Finance, illustrating how social-engineering campaigns still deliver significant damage.
In parallel, Resolv Labs experienced a compromise of its AWS key-management service, illustrating how access-control failures can underpin large losses even when the code itself isn’t the root cause. Hacken’s incident mapping also flags the broader “playbook” that attackers used in 2025—fake VC outreach, malicious video-call tooling, and endpoint compromises—that reportedly contributed to roughly $2.04 billion in sector-wide losses that year.
Beyond these marquee cases, six audited projects—among them Resolv (18 audits) and Venus (five auditing firms)—accounted for $37.7 million in losses. The data hints at a nuanced relationship between audit activity and loss exposure: higher-value protocols with more assets at stake may attract more sophisticated attackers, even if audited.
Audits, TVL, and the resilience gap
The finding that six audited projects were responsible for millions in losses despite having undergone multiple audits raises a practical question for builders: does audit severity or frequency translate into real-world risk reduction? Hacken notes that these audited protocols typically carry higher total value locked (TVL), which equates to bigger prize pools for attackers. In other words, audits alone may not solve the complex, multi-layer risk profile faced by high-TVL projects, underscoring the need for continuous security monitoring and layered defenses.
Regulatory tightening and the move toward “regulator-ready” security
The quarter’s regulatory backdrop reinforces the story that security is becoming a market and a compliance issue. MiCA and DORA are moving deeper into enforcement, with regional regulators increasing expectations for ongoing security practices. In Dubai, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority tightened its Technology and Information Rulebook, while Singapore has enforced Basel-aligned capital and rapid incident-notification timelines. The UAE’s new Capital Market Authority has assumed broader digital-asset oversight with stiffer penalties. Hacken frames these developments as a call to operators to demonstrate constant security readiness, not just to pass a one-off audit.
As part of this shift, Hacken advocates a concrete framework for “regulator-ready” security architectures. The blueprint includes:
- Proof-of-reserves attestations backed by daily internal reconciliation;
- 24/7 on-chain monitoring across treasury wallets and privileged roles;
- Automated circuit-breakers for minting and governance actions;
- Incident notification clocks calibrated to the strictest applicable standard.
Hacken also references a spectrum of response-time targets, distinguishing between “realistic” and “aspirational” goals. Realistic aims include awareness within 24 hours, labeling within four hours, and blocking within 30 seconds. Aspirational targets envision detection within 10 minutes and a 1-second block, drawing on data from Global Ledger’s 2025 Laundering Race. While ambitious, these benchmarks outline concrete steps for projects seeking to align with regulator expectations and institutional counterparties.
Threat actors, playbooks, and the evolving risk landscape
The report keeps returning to the human factor: North Korean actor clusters are identified as the most consistent operational threat in Q1 2026. The combination of social-engineering campaigns, fake professional outreach, and compromised employee endpoints continues to provide a reliable pathway to large losses. The Step Finance case and the Bitrefill-related infrastructure breach illustrate a broader pattern where attackers blend social manipulation with technical exploitation to extract value, often targeting high-value protocols with sophisticated tooling.
For investors, developers, and operators, the takeaway is clear: a successful‑looking deployment with strong smart contracts can still be undermined by weak operational practices, poor key management, or insufficient incident response readiness. The evolving threat landscape demands a multi-layered security approach, ongoing monitoring, and a clear plan for rapid containment—precisely what regulators are now pushing as non-negotiable standards. For builders, this means integrating security into product design from day one and maintaining a culture of continuous testing, diligence, and resilience.
Further reading and related reporting reinforce the broader context: industry-wide security incidents in early 2026 came with a cautionary reminder that DeFi risk resides not just in code but in how projects operate, govern, and respond under pressure. As enforcement tightens and security expectations rise, market participants will be watched not just for audits and audits’ results, but for visible, verifiable resilience across people, processes, and technologies.
Looking ahead, observers will be watching whether Q2 2026 echoes the Q1 trend toward infrastructure and operational risks or whether new defenses and policy measures begin to close the gap. The balance between code quality, operational hygiene, and regulatory compliance will determine how quickly the ecosystem can move toward a posture that can withstand both sophisticated attacks and tougher supervisory regimes.
Senhwa Biosciences, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company based in Taiwan, has entered a partnership with a global investment group to accelerate its artificial intelligence-related drug development.
Summary
- Senhwa Biosciences secured up to $16 million from Global Emerging Markets affiliate GEM to advance its clinical pipeline and AI-driven drug discovery platform.
- The firm is expanding oncology programs and leveraging C2S “cell-to-sentence” technology with CellType to accelerate identification of combination cancer therapies.
- Early AI validation supports its “cold-to-hot tumor” strategy, positioning Senhwa within the emerging immuno-oncology 2.0 space.
According to an April 14 report, Senhwa Biosciences has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with GEM Yield Bahamas Limited, an affiliate of Global Emerging Markets, where the latter will provide up to $16 million in capital to support Senhwa’s strategic growth.
These include the advancement of its clinical pipeline, the expansion of its oncology programs, and the scaling of its machine learning discovery platform.
Besides focusing on cancer research, the firm has been looking into innovative ways to interpret complex biological datasets. After leveraging its connections with Y Combinator, it collaborated with the biotech firm CellType to implement next-generation cell-to-sentence technology.
This system has led researchers to identify actionable insights more quickly, allowing for a more structured approach to finding combination treatments for various malignancies.
The AI-enabled validation process has shown that Senhwa’s lead compounds can effectively modulate immune responses within the tumor microenvironment.
It reinforces its cold-to-hot tumor strategy and thus enables Senhwa to stand out as a leader in the immuno-oncology 2.0 field. This comes as AI-assisted drug discovery becomes a standard for modern medicine. For instance, the ability to predict how a drug interacts with a resistant tumor can significantly shorten the time required for clinical trials.
As per Senhwa, the strategic funding will enable it to move its clinical trials forward alongside its technological expansion. This would significantly strengthen the company’s position in the global biopharmaceutical market.
At the same time, the partnership will likely open new doors for international collaborations and future commercialization.
OpenAI acquires Hiro, an AI personal finance startup
Ethereum price breaks out from multi-year descending channel, eyes upside to $3,400
‘Euphoria’ Honors Angus Cloud And Eric Dane
-
Politics4 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Sports4 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Tech7 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Politics4 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
Politics2 days agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World5 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Business4 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Fashion7 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Crypto World17 hours agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
NewsBeat2 days agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Crypto World13 hours agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
Business4 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business3 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Politics4 days agoLBC Presenter Mocks Trump Over Iran War Failures
-
Crypto World3 days agoFederal judge blocks Arizona from bringing criminal charges against Kalshi
-
Tech5 days agoA version of Windows 10 released a decade ago is now eligible for additional security patches
-
NewsBeat2 days agoJD Vance announces ‘no agreement’ with Iran over nuclear weapons fear
-
Business3 days agoIMF retains floor for precautionary balances at SDR 20 billion
You must be logged in to post a comment Login