The women in the new study were prescribed estrogen only, and not the combination of estrogen and progesterone that is more commonly used to treat menopausal symptoms. Progesterone is prescribed to protect the uterus, but women who have had a hysterectomy, like those in the study, can safely be prescribed estrogen. This population provides a good way to study the effects of estrogen itself, since researchers believe it’s the hormone with more wide-ranging effects on the body, including in the brain.

Hadi Hosseini, an associate professor of psychiatry at Stanford and co-author of the study, says the results don’t establish a cause-and-effect link between estrogen and Alzheimer’s disease, but they do provide a reason to further study the role of the hormone in the neurodegenerative disease. “Previous studies,” including the Women’s Health Initiative, “showed that hormone therapy—estrogen plus progesterone—had a negative effect on Alzheimer’s disease risk and memory outcomes,” he says. “These data are bringing awareness to the fact that maybe we need to reconsider some of the previous findings, since we can now look properly at Alzheimer’s disease outcomes, different formulations of hormone therapy, different times of initiating the therapy, and different durations of use.”

The CFTC has scheduled a three-hour meeting for Aug. 20 to examine crypto assets, artificial intelligence, prediction markets, and its recent work across the three sectors.

CFTC meeting will put crypto and AI policy on the agenda

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission said in an Aug. 11 Federal Register notice that its Innovation Advisory Committee will hold its inaugural meeting on Aug. 20, bringing members together to discuss crypto assets, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets.

Scheduled to run from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, the meeting will take place in person for committee members in Washington. Members of the public will be able to follow the proceedings virtually, and the session may finish before 4 p.m. if the committee completes its business early.

The CFTC said recent agency activity involving the three areas will also form part of the discussion. Its notice does not identify a proposed rule that members will vote on, nor does it state that the meeting will produce immediate policy changes.

Rather, the IAC advises the commission on issues where technology, law, policy and finance overlap. Its recommendations may inform the agency’s work, but the committee does not independently adopt or enforce CFTC regulations.

Chairman Michael S. Selig, who sponsors the committee, announced the meeting separately on Aug. 10. According to the CFTC announcement, the group consists of U.S. entrepreneurs, researchers, industry participants, and other specialists chosen to give the agency input on changes in financial markets.

Selig’s announcement described the subjects under review as part of a “new frontier of finance.” However, the release did not include a detailed regulatory proposal for crypto, AI or prediction markets, leaving the committee’s specific discussion points to the meeting agenda and presentations.

Crypto oversight has become a larger CFTC responsibility

Digital assets enter the meeting as Congress continues to consider giving the CFTC a more extensive role in U.S. crypto markets. Existing law already gives the agency authority over commodity derivatives, including futures and options tied to assets such as Bitcoin, while the SEC oversees securities and securities transactions.

Pending market-structure legislation could expand the CFTC’s responsibilities in digital commodity spot markets. A recent crypto.news review of CFTC capacity reported that the agency had 556 employees and a $365 million budget, compared with about 4,200 staff and a $2.149 billion budget at the SEC.

The CFTC’s Office of Inspector General identified digital asset regulation as its leading management and performance challenge for 2026, according to the same report. Any expansion of the agency’s authority would therefore place staffing, technology and funding questions alongside decisions about registration, market surveillance and customer protection.

Work on crypto policy has continued while lawmakers debate the agency’s future remit. In March, the CFTC joined the SEC in issuing an interpretation on how federal securities laws apply to certain crypto assets and related transactions. The two regulators also signed a memorandum of understanding covering coordination between their agencies.

The commission has taken separate action in crypto derivatives markets. In May, it approved KalshiEX’s Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued staff relief involving Coinbase Financial Markets and certain foreign crypto perpetual products.

As reported at the time, the Kalshi decision opened a federally regulated route for U.S. traders to access a Bitcoin perpetual futures product. The related Coinbase letter allowed specified customer-owned digital commodities and payment stablecoins to be transferred to an affiliated foreign broker as margin, subject to the conditions set by CFTC staff.

Prediction markets face federal and state disputes

Prediction markets will give the committee another unresolved U.S. regulatory issue to examine. The platforms offer event contracts whose payouts depend on the outcome of elections, sporting events, economic data releases, and other measurable events.

CFTC-registered exchanges maintain that eligible event contracts fall under federal derivatives law. State gaming regulators and other critics have challenged some sports-related products as unlicensed betting, leading to litigation over whether federal derivatives oversight displaces state gambling rules.

During 2026, the commission reaffirmed its view that it holds exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction markets within the derivatives framework. It also withdrew a 2024 proposal that would have restricted contracts involving political contests, sports, and other listed categories.

In March, the CFTC started another public process focused on event-contract regulation. Submissions came from prediction market operators, crypto companies, venture investors, and state gambling authorities, according to a May policy report.

More recent requests show that the disagreement extends beyond the basic question of federal authority. On Aug. 3, the NFL asked the CFTC to require a minimum age of 21, stronger controls against insider trading, and closer reviews of sports contracts, according to the league’s comments covered in a prediction-market filing.

The commission has also addressed how event contracts are presented to customers. In an Aug. 7 staff letter, its Division of Market Oversight and Market Participants Division reminded regulated entities that their pricing displays and marketing must clearly distinguish derivative products from bookmaker-style wagering.

AI discussion follows the CFTC’s own use of the technology

Artificial intelligence will be considered both as a financial-market tool and as technology already being used inside the regulator. The CFTC has applied AI to tasks that include reviewing registration materials and examining trading data, according to public statements from Selig.

Such use raises questions about data quality, automated analysis, and regulatory accountability within the agency’s operations. The official meeting notice does not list individual AI systems, potential safeguards, or a planned enforcement policy, so any recommendations will depend on the presentations and committee discussion on Aug. 20.

The IAC works alongside the CFTC’s Innovation Task Force, which Selig created in March to develop policy involving crypto and blockchain technology, AI and autonomous systems, and prediction markets and event contracts. Michael J. Passalacqua leads the task force with staff drawn from several parts of the commission.

When announcing the task force, Selig said clear rules could support “responsible innovation at home” and prevent U.S. market participants from being “left on the sidelines.” The CFTC also said the team would coordinate with other federal bodies, including the SEC and its Crypto Task Force.

Public participation in the IAC meeting will remain open after the livestream ends. The Federal Register notice allows interested parties to submit written statements until Aug. 27 through Regulations.gov, by mail to CFTC Secretary Christopher Kirkpatrick, or by hand delivery to the commission’s Washington headquarters. Submissions must identify the “Innovation Advisory Committee,” and the CFTC said qualifying statements will become part of the public record.

Tether has completed its first independent financial statement audit, with KPMG U.S. issuing an unqualified opinion after reviewing its 2025 accounts and a reported $6.814 billion reserve surplus.

Tether said Thursday that KPMG U.S. conducted the audit of Tether International, S.A. de C.V. under applicable professional standards and issued an unqualified opinion on the company’s financial statements.

KPMG’s opinion covers Tether’s full 2025 accounts

Rather than examining only a reserve report at a particular date, KPMG reviewed the company’s financial position as of Dec. 31, 2025, along with its operating results and cash flows for the full year. The audit covered the balance sheet, income statement, statement of changes in equity, and cash flow statement.

According to Tether, KPMG concluded that the statements “present fairly, in all material respects” the company’s financial position and results under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

An unqualified opinion means the auditor did not attach reservations, exceptions, or qualifications to its conclusion. Tether described the result as a clean audit, although the opinion applies specifically to the audited 2025 financial statements and the related evidence examined by KPMG.

The audit also tested the records supporting individual balance-sheet entries. KPMG examined transactions, internal systems, asset ownership, valuations, counterparties, and documents used to prepare the accounts, according to the announcement.

Tether CFO Simon McWilliams said the audited statements reported that reserves exceeded the liabilities connected to issued tokens by $6.814 billion at the end of 2025. The company said the result was consistent with the reserve figures it had disclosed through earlier attestations.

KPMG separately inspected Tether’s physical gold holdings. Auditors counted every bar and checked its identifying information instead of depending only on statements supplied by custodians or other counterparties.

Tether audit goes beyond quarterly attestations

Tether has published independent reserve attestations for several years, but an attestation has a narrower purpose than a full audit of annual financial statements. Reserve reports generally address management’s presentation of assets and liabilities at a set reporting date, while the KPMG engagement covered Tether’s accounts and underlying evidence for an entire financial year.

The company began the process in March after appointing an unnamed Big Four accounting firm. As crypto.news previously reported, the engagement followed an initial review of Tether’s systems, internal controls, and financial reporting procedures.

Tether later identified KPMG as the auditor. CFO McWilliams had joined the company in early 2025 with responsibility for developing the internal finance structure needed to complete a full audit.

At the time of the March engagement, USDT had a market capitalization above $184 billion and more than 550 million users, according to Tether. In its latest announcement, the company put its user base above 650 million, largely across emerging markets where people use USDT for payments, savings, remittances, and access to U.S. dollars.

CEO Paolo Ardoino said KPMG did not limit its work to headline reserve figures. According to Ardoino, the firm examined the assets, records, transactions, systems, and other evidence supporting the financial statements under standards set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Tether called the engagement the largest inaugural financial audit in history. KPMG’s opinion, however, addresses whether the statements were fairly presented under U.S. GAAP; the claim about the audit’s record size came from Tether.

Reserve figures changed after the 2025 audit date

Because the audited statements cover the year ending Dec. 31, 2025, the $6.814 billion surplus is separate from the reserve figures disclosed in Tether’s quarterly reports during 2026.

At the end of the first quarter, Tether reported $191.8 billion in assets and $8.23 billion in excess reserves. Its second-quarter attestation, prepared by BDO and released July 31, later placed assets at $187.75 billion against liabilities of $183.64 billion.

July reserve data showed that Tether generated about $1.5 billion in second-quarter net operating profit while its excess reserve cushion fell to $4.11 billion. USDT supply stood at about $184.6 billion at the end of June, and the token accounted for more than 60% of the global stablecoin market.

Tether’s asset mix had also continued to change after the audited year closed. The Q2 attestation showed physical gold holdings of about 146.2 metric tons and Bitcoin holdings of 98,933 BTC, while the company reduced its secured lending exposure during the quarter.

Gold formed part of the KPMG verification work for the 2025 statements. By March 31, 2026, Tether reported roughly 707,747 fine troy ounces backing its XAUT token, up from about 520,000 ounces at the end of 2025. Earlier, Tether Gold figures valued the token’s bullion reserves at more than $3.3 billion.

U.S. stablecoin rules keep audit requirements in focus

KPMG’s use of U.S. GAAP gives American investors and counterparties a familiar accounting basis for reviewing Tether’s 2025 financial statements. An unqualified audit opinion does not, by itself, determine whether USDT complies with U.S. stablecoin law or qualifies for continued listing on American trading platforms.

The GENIUS Act established federal rules for payment stablecoin issuers, including reserve, disclosure, and supervisory requirements. President Donald Trump signed the legislation in July 2025, with several provisions requiring agencies to complete implementing rules before the framework takes full effect.

Tether operates USDT through an issuer outside the United States, making the law’s treatment of foreign stablecoins relevant to its access to American centralized exchanges. Legal experts have said foreign issuers may need to follow lawful freeze and seizure orders once the law becomes effective, while other conditions tied to exchange listings have a longer implementation period.

A July review of USDT access found that the general transition period runs into 2028, although the timing of some obligations for foreign issuers remains subject to regulatory interpretation. Tether has said it intends to comply with the law, but federal agencies have not completed all rules governing foreign stablecoin issuers.

Alongside USDT, Tether has introduced USAT as a separate dollar-backed token built for the American market. Anchorage Digital Bank issues USAT under a U.S.-regulated structure, while Cantor Fitzgerald serves as reserve custodian.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) plans to use blockchain technology to offer faster settlement of Japanese government bond (JGB) transactions, in a move reminiscent of similar initiatives by banks in other countries.

MUFG is preparing a proof-of-concept for onchain JGB transactions using the Canton network to expedite the settlement, which typically takes 1-3 days by traditional means.

The Tokyo-based bank expects to improve the operational and capital efficiency of repo transactions — the purchase of securities as a form of short-term borrowing and lending — through real-time 24/7 onchain settlement.

MUFG noted that financial institutions in Europe and the U.S. have expanded proof-of-concept projects to achieve this exact goal. Blockchain-based intraday U.S. Treasury-bond repos have existed for several years through JPMorgan’s Kinexys network, which went live in 2020.

“Given their high credit worthiness and liquidity, JGBs are widely used as collateral for repo transactions by market participants in Japan and overseas, and momentum for bringing them onchain is growing,” MUFG said on Wednesday.

The project forms part of a broader array of MUFG initiatives exploring the use of blockchain technology in traditional financial functions. Most recently, the bank teamed up with two of the largest Japanese banks, Sumitomo ⁠Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) and Mizuho Financial Group, to explore listing a jointly issued stablecoin by March 2027.

Compounding the issue, many DAT firms have consistently favored issuing debt to fund purchases of BTC. That strategy raises the question of how different they are from governments that borrow heavily to fund investments that fail to generate adequate returns. Both, ultimately, lead to high indebtedness relative to income. As we have noted before, bitcoin lacks inherent yield, return or cash flow.

For now, however, the market doesn’t appear to be worried about these dynamics. BTC continues to trade between $62,000 and $66,000, as it has for weeks, with today’s price action largely below $64,000.

Some analysts say they remain optimistic that the bear market has run its course, pointing to a price range that corresponds with the previous bull-cycle high.

“The peaks of the 2021 bull market were close to these levels,” Alex Kuptsikevich, the chief analyst at FxPro, said in an email. “Three years ago, Bitcoin’s decline generally halted at $20K, which was close to the peak of the previous bull market at the end of 2017. This supports our view that the decline may have run its course, with bearish momentum fading as Bitcoin approaches the 200-week moving average.”

Other analysts have turned their focus to August’s Jackson Hole symposium of central banks and economic data for trading cues. Stay alert!

Figure Technology Solutions reported $4.3 billion in consumer loan marketplace volume for the second quarter, up 132% from a year earlier, as its quarterly profit nearly tripled. 

On Thursday, Figure said net income rose 192% year over year to $87 million, from about $30 million. Net revenue more than doubled to $226 million, while its net income margin increased 10.5 percentage points to 38.8%. 

Figure’s marketplace volume includes home equity lines of credit, debt-service coverage ratio loans and personal loans processed through its loan origination system, along with third-party loans traded on Figure Connect, which accounted for $2.8 billion, or 65%, of the quarterly total. 

Volume on the marketplace, which Figure launched in June 2024, increased 262% from the same period last year. The company also added 102 loan-origination partners during the quarter, bringing its total to 489. 

CEO Michael Tannenbaum said weekly loan applications surpassed $1 billion in July. Figure expects consumer loan marketplace volume of between $4.8 billion and $5.2 billion in the third quarter. 

Bernstein analysts predicted in May that Figure would post record second-quarter volume, citing live blockchain data that they said could increasingly allow investors to track the company’s lending activity in real time. 

Related: Tokenized RWA market grows 420% since 2025 on regulatory clarity, access

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.