Crypto World
BYD Faces Steepest Sales Decline in Six Years During February Slump
Key Takeaways
- February 2026 saw BYD’s NEV sales plunge 41.1% compared to the previous year, representing the most severe contraction since February 2020.
- The automaker has now experienced six months in a row of declining sales figures.
- NEV manufacturing output and sales volumes both contracted approximately 38% versus February 2025.
- The passenger vehicle segment experienced the most significant impact.
- International shipments reached 100,600 NEVs, while battery manufacturing capacity maintained strength.
The Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer BYD has reported its most dramatic monthly sales contraction in six years, with February figures showing a 41.1% year-over-year decrease. This alarming trend extends the company’s sales downturn to half a year.
The magnitude of this decline hasn’t been witnessed since February 2020, during the initial economic disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic.
According to a regulatory disclosure published over the weekend, both manufacturing and sales of new energy vehicles contracted by roughly 38% when compared to the same period in 2025.
The passenger vehicle category bore the brunt of the downturn, although BYD opted not to provide granular segment-level data in its official filing.
These disappointing results emerge despite the company’s commanding presence in the worldwide electric vehicle sector and its aggressive expansion into foreign territories.
International Sales Provide Limited Relief
In terms of overseas distribution, BYD delivered 100,600 NEVs internationally during February, a metric the manufacturer identified as a relative positive amid otherwise challenging circumstances.
Battery manufacturing operations remained resilient. BYD emphasized its installed capacity for NEV power systems and energy storage batteries as indicators of sustained operational scale, despite the contraction in vehicle unit sales.
The organization seems to be relying increasingly on its battery division and international operations to counterbalance weaker performance in its home market.
It’s important to recognize that February traditionally represents a slower sales period for China’s automotive industry, primarily due to Lunar New Year celebrations that reduce operational days and showroom activity.
While this seasonal pattern occurs annually, the magnitude of the current downturn remains striking even when factoring in these calendar-related considerations.
Financial Performance Indicators
BYD’s year-to-date stock performance reflects a modest decline of -0.42% at the time of the regulatory submission, with the company maintaining a market capitalization of HK$890 billion.
Daily trading activity averages approximately 21.5 million shares.
Technical analysis indicators currently suggest a Buy rating for the equity.
The latest analyst coverage for HK:1211 also recommends a Buy position, establishing a target price of HK$130.00.
The extended six-month pattern of declining monthly sales volumes prompts concerns regarding short-term market demand, especially within China’s domestic market where rivalry among electric vehicle manufacturers has grown increasingly fierce.
BYD’s February 2026 regulatory submission verified that aggregate NEV production and sales both decreased by approximately 38% on an annual basis, with international shipments totaling 100,600 vehicles and battery division capacity characterized as robust.
Lighter reported that its upgraded liquidity pool system successfully limited ADL losses to a pre-determined threshold.
On February 26, Lighter, a decentralized crypto exchange, announced that its upgraded liquidity pool system successfully resisted a $50 million ARC perpetual long squeeze attempt.
This occurred after approximately 600 traders reversed a whale’s position, resulting in an $8.2 million loss, and the episode tested Lighter’s newly launched LLP Strategies, capping the downside risk for liquidity providers at just $75,000.
LLP Strategies Face First Stress Event
In a February 17 post on X, Lighter announced changes to its LLP infrastructure, splitting liquidity into separate strategies for different market types, including RWAs. Risk, liquidations, and auto-deleveraging are now handled at the strategy level rather than across the entire pool.
That structure faced what the platform called its “first battle test” on February 26. According to Lighter, a trader had built a large long position in ARC perpetuals over several days, with around 600 other traders and market makers taking the short side and pushing total open interest to $50 million.
ARC perp trading was assigned to Strategy #7, a high-risk strategy with about $75,000 in allocated USDC. Lighter said this meant only that portion of LLP deposits could be exposed if auto-deleveraging occurred.
As ARC’s price fell around 6 p.m. ET on February 26, the large long position was first liquidated on the order book for roughly $2 million. Lighter said LLP was initially in profit on the position, but further downside depleted Strategy #7, triggering another ADL at 0.071123. In the end, the whale lost about $8.2 million, LLP lost its capped $75,000 allocation, and short traders who held their positions were profitable.
ARC Price Collapse
The unwind left visible scars on the ARC price chart, with data from CoinGecko showing the token experienced a flash crash in the early hours of February 27, sliding from around $0.031 to $0.025 before recovering to $0.0348.
You may also like:
At the time of writing, ARC, which powers the Ryzome agentic AI “app store,” was down over 9% in 24 hours and nearly 59% across seven days. The token has also lost more than 63% of its value in the past two weeks, as well as falling 42% over 30 days. It currently sits 95% below its January 2025 all-time high of $0.62, having shed nearly 88% off its price in the past year.
This turbulence matches up with observations from crypto commentator Simon Dedic, who noted that ARC’s value had dipped overnight by about 80% on volumes approaching $400 million, which was nearly ten times its fully diluted valuation.
Dedic pointed out that before dumping, the token had been “massively outperforming” despite a weak market, even suggesting it had been “heavily manipulated.”
The concerns raised by Dedic echo a broader industry debate about market integrity. Just last month, Base co-founder Jesse Pollak rejected the idea of behind-the-scenes manipulation, stating his team won’t coordinate or deploy capital to influence prices because markets “deserve to be free, open, and fair.”
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Crypto World
What the U.S. Treasury’s $745 Million TIPS Buyback Actually Means for the National Debt
TLDR:
- The U.S. Treasury confirmed a $745 million TIPS buyback on February 25, 2026, as part of routine debt management.
- The $2.7 billion weekly repurchase operation accounts for less than 0.008% of the total $35 trillion national debt.
- Treasury buybacks have been used since 2002 to improve bond market liquidity and manage maturity structure efficiently.
- The repurchase reshuffles existing debt obligations but does not cancel principal or alter the broader fiscal debt outlook.
U.S. Treasury buyback operations came into focus on February 25, 2026, as the government confirmed a $745 million repurchase of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).
The transaction was part of a broader $2.7 billion repurchase program executed that same week. The bonds involved fall within a 2027–2036 maturity range.
While the action reflects active portfolio management, analysts note it does not reduce the national debt. The total U.S. debt currently exceeds $35 trillion.
Treasury Buyback Functions as a Routine Portfolio Management Tool
The U.S. Treasury buyback program has been in active use since 2002. Over recent years, the program has been expanded to meet growing bond market demands.
The primary goal is to enhance liquidity in older, less actively traded bond issues. These operations also help smooth refinancing cycles and manage interest rate exposure.
Paul White Gold Eagle noted on X that the $2.7 billion weekly operation represents less than 0.008% of total outstanding debt.
The $745 million TIPS repurchase amounts to roughly 0.00002% of the total federal debt load. These figures make clear that the buyback operates within a narrow financial scope. It does not translate into any measurable reduction in overall debt.
Treasury officials describe the buyback as a tool to improve functioning in bond markets. The operation also aims to maintain stability within secondary markets for government securities.
By targeting bonds in the 2027–2036 maturity range, the Treasury manages its future refinancing schedule. This approach is designed to reduce rollover risk over the medium term.
The buyback ultimately reshuffles existing obligations within the Treasury’s broader issuance strategy. It does not cancel debt or reduce the principal amount owed to bondholders.
Rather, it adjusts the composition of outstanding securities in circulation. This distinction matters when assessing the true fiscal result of such operations.
Structural Debt Concerns Stay Unchanged After the Repurchase
The broader debt picture remains a pressing concern for fiscal observers and analysts. The national debt now surpasses $35 trillion and continues on an upward path.
A $745 million repurchase barely registers against that scale of obligation. The gap between buyback size and total debt volume remains enormous.
Without long-term spending reform or meaningful revenue adjustments, the debt trajectory stays the same. Portfolio adjustments are not a substitute for genuine fiscal consolidation measures.
Treasury repurchase operations serve operational and technical goals, not fiscal reduction ones. Debt reduction requires legislative action and structural policy changes.
As Paul White Gold Eagle stated, this action “is not debt cancellation.” It remains a standard liquidity and portfolio management tool.
The buyback does improve technical efficiency within bond markets during periods of tighter financial conditions. However, it leaves the macro debt outlook fundamentally unchanged.
Market observers continue watching Treasury operations closely for signals of any broader fiscal strategy. For now, the $745 million repurchase remains a routine technical adjustment within existing programs.
It reflects the Treasury’s ongoing effort to manage the maturity structure of current obligations. The national debt trajectory, however, continues on its present course without alteration.
Tarek Mansour, the co-founder of prediction market Kalshi, provided an update, following the platform’s decision to void some positions that were opened after the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was confirmed.
“We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here,” Mansour said in a post on X.
Iranian state media reported the death early Sunday, after an attack launched by Israel and the United States a day earlier.
Kalshi is reimbursing all fees from the “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader” market, and will pay traders with positions open before Khamenei died according to the “last-traded price before his death,” Mansour said.
Additionally, users who opened positions after the death of Khamenei were reimbursed the difference between the higher price paid for entry and the last traded price.
A Kalshi spokesperson told Cointelegraph that the platform’s policy on not allowing “death markets” is clear and long-standing.
The platform reiterated the policy on Saturday, and Mansour said that the death carveout stipulations were clearly stated in the rules for the market. However, the decision sparked backlash from users online, who accused the platform of curtailing user profits.
Related: Kalshi bans US politician over alleged insider trading violation
Suspicions of insider trading activity on prediction market platforms rise amid geopolitical tensions
In February, six traders on rival prediction market Polymarket netted about $1 million betting that the US would initiate a strike on Iran before the end of the month.
All six wallets were created in February, mostly bet on markets related to a strike on Iran, and some of the positions were filled hours before the first explosions were heard over the Iranian capital of Tehran, according to Bloomberg.
The trading patterns raised suspicion of insider trading activity among onchain investigators and analysts.
In January, US President Donald Trump announced that the individual who leaked information tied to the raid and capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro had been arrested by US law enforcement.
The comments fueled speculation from onchain analysis platform Lookonchain that the leaker Trump was referencing may have been linked to winning bets on Polymarket placed shortly before the US raid in Caracas.
Magazine: Astrology could make you a better crypto trader: It has been foretold
Pi Coin price is attempting to recover after forming a new all-time low earlier this month. The altcoin has shown modest strength in recent sessions, holding above key short-term support.
However, broader technical indicators and historical patterns suggest that Pi Coin’s price recovery may face significant resistance in March 2026.
While some investors anticipate stabilization, momentum indicators highlight persistent weakness. Past seasonal trends and current capital flows imply that Pi Coin could remain under pressure unless buying demand improves meaningfully.
Pi Coin’s Past Is Bleak
March has historically been volatile for Pi Coin. In March 2024, PI declined by 66.5%, marking its weakest monthly performance on record. That steep drop followed its initial launch phase, when early participants moved quickly to secure profits.
The sharp decline was largely driven by immediate post-launch distribution. Early miners and holders capitalized on newly available liquidity. Those specific launch-related dynamics do not fully apply today. However, the memory of extreme volatility still shapes investor caution entering March 2026.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
PI Holders Aren’t Too Supportive
The Money Flow Index now signals renewed selling pressure. MFI has slipped below the neutral 50 mark, reflecting capital outflows rather than sustained inflows. This shift often precedes extended corrective phases when buyer conviction weakens.
Historically, whenever MFI dropped below neutral for PI, the price tended to decline until buying momentum returned. Current readings suggest that sellers remain active. Unless the indicator rebounds above 50, downside risks may continue to outweigh short-term recovery attempts.
The Chaikin Money Flow indicator reinforces this cautious outlook. CMF has remained below the zero line for nearly three consecutive weeks. Persistent negative readings signal ongoing net outflows from Pi Coin.
These outflows indicate fading investor confidence. Reduced participation from new buyers compounds the issue. Without fresh capital entering the ecosystem, upward price movements may lack sustainability. Weak inflows often limit breakout potential and increase vulnerability to corrections.
PI Price May See a Reversal
Pi Coin price is trading at $0.1701 at the beginning of March, holding above an ascending trendline support. Immediate resistance sits at $0.1752. Despite this structure, technical indicators suggest that March may bring corrective pressure rather than sustained gains.
Quarterly performance adds another layer of concern. Following mixed results in January and February, Pi Coin is tracking a 16% loss for Q1 2026. Closing the quarter in negative territory could weigh on investor sentiment heading into Q2, especially if broader crypto market conditions remain cautious.
If selling pressure intensifies, Pi Coin may decline toward the $0.1597 support level. A breakdown below that threshold would likely expose $0.1502. Continued weakness could push the price closer to the all-time low of $0.1300, increasing downside risk in the near term.
The bearish thesis would be invalidated only if buyers regain control. A decisive breakout above $0.1752 would be the first signal of strength. Flipping $0.2002 into support would confirm renewed bullish momentum. Sustained inflows and improved sentiment would be required to support such a move and stabilize Pi Coin price action.
TLDR:
- Binance received over 472 million XRP worth $652M, marking February’s largest single inflow period.
- U.S.–Iran strikes launched after market close, leaving crypto directly exposed to the geopolitical shock.
- XRP price has rolled back toward $1.44 after rallying above $3, with MACD and RSI turning bearish.
- Open interest across exchanges contracted sharply, signaling leverage is being flushed rather than rebuilt.
XRP selling pressure worth $650 million has emerged as U.S.–Iran tensions escalate sharply. Over the past week, large token inflows into Binance have raised red flags across the crypto market.
Geopolitical uncertainty has driven investors toward a more defensive posture, moving liquidity closer to the market.
Combined with weakening technical readings and shrinking derivatives activity, XRP now faces mounting headwinds that traders and analysts are watching closely.
Binance Inflows Surge as Geopolitical Shock Hits Crypto Markets
The U.S.–Iran standoff intensified over the weekend when the first strikes launched shortly after traditional financial markets closed.
That timing left crypto markets directly exposed to the geopolitical shock without broader market support. Risk assets reacted almost immediately, and XRP was among the most visibly affected tokens.
On-chain analyst Darkfost reported that Binance received more than 472 million XRP over the past week alone. That volume translates to roughly $652 million worth of tokens flowing into the exchange.
Darkfost confirmed this marks the largest single inflow period recorded throughout the month of February.
Large exchange inflows of this size typically reflect a defensive shift among token holders. When investors move tokens onto exchanges, it often signals a readiness to sell or at least position liquidity closer to active markets. Flows at this scale can create conditions for sudden selling waves that affect short-term price action.
Darkfost noted that it remains too early to confirm whether this activity marks the start of a broader distribution dynamic.
However, the analyst stressed the situation warrants close monitoring to determine if panic movements tied to geopolitical uncertainty will deepen further in the days ahead.
Technical Weakness and Derivatives Data Reinforce the Bearish Setup
The $650 million inflow surge arrives against an already deteriorating technical backdrop for XRP. After rallying above $3 earlier this cycle, price has since rolled back toward the $1.44 zone.
Analyst DavidTheBuilder noted that the MACD has crossed lower, histogram bars remain red, and RSI has drifted toward the lower half of its range.
These readings stop short of signaling full capitulation. However, the aggressive upside energy that once powered XRP’s breakout has clearly faded. The current chart structure bears little resemblance to the euphoria phase that drove the earlier rally higher.
Derivatives data tells a similar story. Open interest across major exchanges spiked sharply during the rally, then contracted just as quickly as traders pulled risk off the table.
When open interest compresses while price trends lower, leverage is typically being flushed rather than built back up.
DavidTheBuilder pointed out that sustained positioning growth has not returned to the market. Strong trends require conviction behind them, and without open interest expanding alongside price, XRP’s path to recovery remains uncertain.
With geopolitical tensions still unresolved, market participants are keeping a close watch on whether conditions stabilize or worsen further.
In a major policy shift, X has removed cryptocurrency and gambling from its prohibited industries list for paid promotions, opening the door for influencers and KOLs to legally monetize crypto content on the platform.
The change marks a significant reversal of a ban that had been in place since at least June 2024.
The entire financial products category, including loans, investment services, and crypto, was removed from X’s advertising policies.
“Crypto is no longer listed under Prohibited Industries for paid promo on X,” observed analyst DeFi Ignas. “The policy page changed recently. On February 16, it was still there.”
Gambling was also removed from the list, while other industries such as pharmaceuticals, tobacco, weapons, and weight loss were added.
The platform’s new Paid Partnership framework requires influencers to disclose any compensated promotion.
“Undisclosed promotions hurt the integrity of the product and lead people to distrust the content they read on X. This new feature will allow you to comply with regulations, but more importantly, it enables you to be transparent with your followers,” Nikita Bier, X’s Head of Product, articulated.
Posts created as part of a Paid Partnership must now include the “Paid Partnership” label. Influencers are responsible for ensuring that content complies with applicable laws, including the FTC’s regulations on endorsements and testimonials.
Meanwhile, X’s updated policy distinguishes Paid Partnerships from standard advertising. This means content prohibited under Paid Partnerships may still be permitted through X Ads.
The policy update has drawn mixed reactions in the crypto community, with some users celebrating the return of crypto promotions.
However, not all reactions are positive, with analyst Benjamin Cowen highlighting what the change means for the business models crypto influencers use.
“90% of crypto influencers now need to find a new business model that does not just involve them pretending to like a project they were paid to promote, allowing them to dump their allocations on the people that trusted them,” warned Cowen.
In the same tone, Rune raised concerns about enforcement, noting that the platform was now banning every user promoting (shilling) cryptos, whether disclosed or not. In their opinion, the latest move lays the groundwork for future restrictions on Crypto Twitter.
“It’s supposed to be for ‘paid partnerships,’ but who can tell the difference between someone promoting a token without being paid and someone who is being paid to promote it? There will be a massive ban wave on CT, and everyone will be scared to shill tokens,” Rune wrote.
General sentiment is that this policy change could reshape crypto marketing on X (Twitter). Crypto influencers who previously relied on informal promotion may need to adapt their strategies.
Meanwhile, brands now have a clearer, legal path for campaigns, provided they adhere strictly to disclosure rules.
The update is effective immediately, signaling X’s attempt to balance regulatory compliance with creator monetization.
As the platform navigates these changes, transparency and proper labeling are likely to become the central pillars of any successful crypto marketing strategy on X.
TLDR:
- Bitcoin fell to $63,000 on Saturday as Middle East tensions surged while all traditional markets remained fully closed.
- On-chain data recorded $100 million migrating from Bitcoin into USDT on the Tron network within a single 24-hour period.
- The USDT Flight Signal hit “1,” confirming a capital rotation from Bitcoin into stablecoins during the geopolitical panic weekend.
- Around $1.9 billion in put options at a $60,000 strike on Deribit revealed strong demand for downside protection among traders.
Bitcoin proved itself a round-the-clock financial tool when Middle East tensions rattled global markets last weekend.
While traditional exchanges sat idle on Saturday, Bitcoin dropped to $63,000 and absorbed the immediate shock of the geopolitical event.
By Sunday, it recovered to $66,000. No bank, no stock exchange, and no traditional market was available. Bitcoin was the only ATM open worldwide, and it processed every transaction without interruption.
When Every Other Market Closed, Bitcoin Stayed Open
Traditional financial systems operate on schedules. They close on weekends, on holidays, and during emergencies. Bitcoin does none of that. When panic spread across global markets on Saturday, investors had one liquid exit available — and they used it immediately.
Investors who sold did not lose faith in Bitcoin. They needed fast dollar liquidity to protect themselves against an unfolding geopolitical crisis.
Bitcoin gave them that access within seconds, at any hour, from any location around the world. No other financial instrument offered that during the same window.
As Cryptoquant analyst GugaOnChain noted , “Bitcoin operated as the only global ATM open during a weekend of panic.” That description is precise and accurate. It processed capital exits while every competing system was offline and unavailable to investors.
On-chain data backed this observation directly. The USDT Flight Signal, which tracks capital movement from Bitcoin into stablecoins on the Tron network, recorded approximately $100 million migrating into USDT within just 24 hours.
Bitcoin’s total market capitalization stood at $1.319 trillion during this period, reflecting the weight of capital that passed through it over the weekend.
On-Chain Data Confirms Bitcoin’s ATM Function in Real Time
The Tron network currently holds between 42% and 50% of all circulating global USDT supply. That makes it the most reliable network for measuring capital behavior during stress events.
When the USDT Flight Signal reads “1,” money is moving out of Bitcoin and into stablecoins. Over this weekend, the signal confirmed that rotation in real time.
The USDT supply on the Tron network reached $84.72 billion during this period. That figure captures the scale of the digital dollar vault that investors ran toward. Bitcoin served as the withdrawal point that made accessing that vault possible on a weekend.
Derivatives markets further confirmed the demand for protection. Roughly $1.9 billion in put options were concentrated on Deribit, with a strike price at $60,000.
Traders had already positioned themselves for downside risk, treating Bitcoin as both an exposure and a hedging instrument simultaneously.
True price discovery, according to market expectations, will follow Monday’s reopening of U.S. markets. Bitcoin, however, had already completed its job.
It absorbed the initial tremor, provided emergency liquidity, and directed capital toward stablecoin shelter — all before traditional markets could open their doors.
UAE’s Capital Markets Authority shut both the Abu Dhabi (ADX) and Dubai Financial Market (DFM) stock exchanges for March 2–3 after Iran struck major ports and oil tankers across the Middle East.
The ADX and DFM are the two primary equities exchanges in the United Arab Emirates, together serving as the Gulf region’s key capital market hubs.
Why it matters:
- Iran’s strikes effectively blocked the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint through which roughly 20 million barrels of oil per day and nearly 20% of global LNG exports transit.
- A sustained Hormuz closure could push oil above $100 per barrel, according to Kobeissi Letter analysis, spiking US CPI inflation toward 5%.
- War-risk insurance costs have reportedly jumped ~50%, adding hundreds of thousands of dollars per voyage and reducing global trade flow.
- Shipping reroutes around Africa add 10–14 extra days to deliveries, slowing just-in-time manufacturing supply chains.
The details:
- UAE’s Capital Markets Authority ordered the two-day closure explicitly to prevent panic selling; officials said it is not a public holiday.
- The exchange shutdown followed Iranian strikes on regional ports.
- Meanwhile, Israel extended its state of emergency through March 12, 2026.
- Qatar, one of the world’s largest LNG exporters, faces potential supply delays as the Hormuz route remains disrupted.
The big picture:
- Gold surged 13% and oil rose 20% over six weeks prior to the strikes, suggesting markets had already priced in geopolitical risk.
- Analysts at Bull Theory compare potential LNG disruption to the 2022 European energy crisis, when governments drew down emergency reserves.
- Trump’s stated policy goals — low inflation and $2.00/gallon gas — conflict directly with a prolonged Iran conflict, which analysts say creates political pressure for a swift resolution.
The post UAE Suspends Stock Trading Amid Iran Strikes appeared first on BeInCrypto.
TLDR:
- Kalshi’s “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” market accumulated over $50 million in total trading volume.
- Traders who held positions before Khamenei’s death were paid out at the last-traded price of 1:14 AM ET.
- Kalshi’s promotional post on X during the strikes drew sharp criticism from former SEC chief of staff Fischer.
- Six Democratic senators urged the CFTC to ban contracts that resolve on or correlate to an individual’s death.
Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated prediction market platform, is under scrutiny following its handling of a controversial contract tied to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Khamenei was killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes early Saturday morning. The market, titled “Ali Khamenei Out as Supreme Leader?” had accumulated over $50 million in total trading volume. Roughly $20 million of that traded on Saturday alone, according to prediction market analyst Dustin Gouker.
Settlement Process Draws Criticism
Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour addressed the controversy directly on X. “We don’t list markets directly tied to death,” Mansour wrote. “When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death.”
Under the CFTC-filed contract terms, positions would settle at the last-traded price before Khamenei’s death. That price was recorded at 1:14 AM ET Saturday, per Mansour.
Trading was halted at approximately 2:59 PM ET on Saturday. Kalshi formally closed the contracts at 10:06 PM ET, according to DeFi Rate.
The platform issued two clarifications throughout the day, acknowledging that prior settlement language was “grammatically ambiguous.”
A key dispute emerged over the timing of Khamenei’s confirmed death. The CFTC-filed terms referenced the “last traded price prior to the death.”
However, the market page read “last traded price prior to confirmed reporting of death.” Hours of active trading occurred between his actual death and public confirmation.
Mansour announced that traders who entered positions before Khamenei died would be paid at the last-traded price.
Those who entered after his death would receive full refunds of their cost of entry. He also confirmed Kalshi would reimburse all fees from the market.
Promotional Posts and Prior Settlements Add to the Debate
While reports of Khamenei’s death circulated Saturday morning, Kalshi posted on X: “BREAKING: The odds Ali Khamenei is out as Supreme Leader have surged to 68%.” Mansour reposted the statement.
Amanda Fischer, a former SEC chief of staff now at Better Markets, described it as “more or less offering a proxy market on assassination.”
Critics also pointed to an earlier Kalshi market asking “Who will be at Trump’s inauguration?” Jimmy Carter was listed as an option.
After Carter died in late December 2024, Kalshi settled that contract to “No.” One widely shared post argued: “You settle on death, just not when it makes you money,” directly contrasting the two outcomes.
Mansour defended the Khamenei market as serving a legitimate purpose. He cited geopolitical, economic, and national security factors as reasons for listing the contract.
He also noted that power transitions in autocracies can happen without death, pointing to Venezuela as a recent example. “It just happened in Venezuela,” Mansour wrote on X.
The controversy also comes as six Democratic senators led by Adam Schiff sent a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig. They urged the agency to ban contracts that result in or correlate to an individual’s death.
The Coalition for Prediction Markets responded that “contracts involving death have no place on American exchanges.” The letter set a March 9 deadline for the CFTC to respond.
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) is widely cited as undervalued when measured against traditional stores of value like gold and the broad money supply, according to Samson Mow, the chief executive of Bitcoin technology firm Jan3. In a Saturday post on X, Mow argued that BTC sits roughly 24% to 66% below its trend relative to gold’s market cap or the level of global liquidity, while gold itself appears overextended. The claim adds a contrarian note to ongoing debates about whether crypto markets have found a bottom or are simply pausing before another leg lower or higher.
At the same time, macro price benchmarks paint a mixed picture. Gold futures for April delivery closed at $5,247.90, while tokenized gold offering PAX Gold USD was trading around $5,404.14 as of the time of writing. Against that backdrop, Mow pointed to Bitcoin’s Z-score—a metric that gauges how closely BTC’s current price tracks its long-run average relative to a benchmark, in this case the BTC-to-gold ratio. A Z-score of 0 means the price aligns with the historical average; negative values signal the asset trading below that average.
The Z-score for the BTC-to-gold ratio was around -1.24 at press time, suggesting BTC remains below its historical mean but not by the extreme margins seen in past episodes. Data from TradingView shows that the indicator has swung widely in the past, including moments when the ratio dipped far beneath the norm. In November 2022, for instance, the BTC-to-gold Z-score briefly plunged below -3, a period coinciding with the FTX collapse and a subsequent rally in BTC of more than 150% over the following 12 months.
This history of decisive rebounds after deep dislocations is echoed by earlier cycles. During the Covid crisis in March 2020, the Z-score dipped below -2 and BTC bottomed near $3,717, only to surge more than 300% in the ensuing year, culminating in a then-astronomical peak in November 2021 of around $69,000. Those patterns have led some analysts to draw parallels with today, while others caution that the macro and regulatory landscape has evolved, potentially altering how these signals play out in real time.
While Mow highlights potential upside based on valuation gaps and historical Z-score triggers, others in the market remain wary. A cross-section of analysts has projected further downside for BTC as investor sentiment wavers in the face of geopolitical tension and persistent macro uncertainty. Some believe the market could test lower levels, with discussions framing a possible move toward new lows for the current cycle. Yet even within this more cautious camp, the same data points used by Mow—value signals and on-chain momentum—are often cited as important clues for the next meaningful directional shift.
For context, the broader crypto narrative has included crosscurrents—from tailwinds such as institutional interest and macro liquidity to headwinds like regulatory risk and episodic liquidity squeezes. The focal point for many observers remains Bitcoin’s role as a potential hedge or as a risk-on asset depending on the moment, as well as how it weathers macro shocks and liquidity cycles. The weekend’s developments in the Middle East added another layer of geopolitical risk, underscoring that crypto markets, like traditional markets, are not insulated from global events.
As the debate about BTC’s trajectory evolves, the market is reminded of past cycles where valuation gaps and extreme sentiment extremes have preceded sharp reversals. The question remains whether the current price near the mid-to-high $60,000s will reflect a duration that negates those earlier patterns or whether a more persistent risk-off mood will push Bitcoin toward the lower end of the spectrum before new catalysts emerge.
In sum, while the price action continues to oscillate near current levels, the ongoing discussion about BTC’s fair value relative to gold and the money supply—augmented by Z-score analysis—provides a framework for assessing potential turning points. The next few weeks could test the resilience of the current range, particularly if the BTC-to-gold ratio reverts toward its historic mean or if macro developments reassert their dominance over market sentiment.
The Z-score framework has shown that when BTC-to-gold moves extend beyond historical norms, corrections or rallies often follow in subsequent months. The current reading around -1.24 keeps the door open to a test of higher ground if support holds and risk appetite returns.
Bitcoin to crash to $50,000?
The contrarian view presented here sits against a broader chorus of analysts who warn that more downside could be on the horizon, driven by ongoing investor caution and geopolitical tensions. Several observers have flagged the possibility of BTC tracing a path toward the $50,000 mark, arguing that price action could mirror or exceed prior bear-market patterns as macro data and regulatory signals unfold. By contrast, those who emphasize valuation and historical precedents point to the same indicators that historically preceded significant rallies following sharp declines, suggesting that a bottom could be forming even as volatility remains elevated.
The ongoing debate about BTC’s bottoming process is not just about price—it touches on liquidity dynamics, risk sentiment, and the durability of crypto-specific catalysts such as on-chain activity, mining economics, and institutional participation. As BTC hovers in a range, traders will likely scrutinize key technical levels, the pace of liquidity inflows, and how macro shocks translate into risk-on or risk-off moves across crypto markets.
Ultimately, the discussion centers on how investors interpret valuation signals in the context of a still-fragile macro environment and evolving regulatory expectations. While some forecasts call for a dramatic re-rating, others argue that a sustainable recovery could emerge as confidence builds and fundamentals align with price action. The next leg of this narrative will be shaped by the balance between speculative momentum and real-world utility that continues to define the crypto market’s longer-term trajectory.
Why it matters
Valuation-driven arguments like Mow’s underscore a broader point: crypto markets are not merely driven by narratives or hype but by measurable relationships to broader financial assets. If Bitcoin’s price starts to close the gap with gold and money supply on a sustained basis, it would alter the risk-reward calculus for both retail and institutional participants, potentially reshaping portfolio allocations and hedging strategies.
Moreover, the BTC-to-gold comparison frames how crypto assets are perceived in the context of traditional stores of value. A shift back toward historical norms in this ratio could signal renewed appetite for crypto as a non-sovereign store of value or a diversification vehicle, even as gold remains a familiar anchor for risk management. These dynamics matter not only for traders but also for developers, miners, and fund managers evaluating how crypto markets fit into broader exposure targets.
From a market structure perspective, such signals also influence liquidity flows, cross-asset correlations, and the pace at which crypto products—like ETFs and exchange-based investment vehicles—can attract new money. In an environment where macro volatility is a persistent feature, signals that imply potential volatility compression or expansion will be watched closely by participants seeking to calibrate risk and reward.
What to watch next
- Monitor BTC price action relative to the -2 and -3 Z-score thresholds for BTC-to-gold, noting whether the ratio reverts toward the mean or diverges further.
- Track the BTC-to-gold ratio on TradingView for signs of momentum shifts that align with macro liquidity trends or risk-on/off sentiment shifts.
- Watch macro indicators and regulatory updates that affect crypto liquidity and investor confidence, especially in regions with active policy debates.
- Observe major price drivers such as exchange capital flows, mining economics, and the pace of adoption in institutional and retail channels.
Sources & verification
- Samson Mow, X post discussing Bitcoin valuation relative to gold and global money supply (link provided in original coverage).
- TradingView data for the BTC-to-gold ratio (BTCXAU) used to illustrate the Z-score dynamics.
- Historical references to the FTX collapse and subsequent BTC rally from Cointelegraph coverage.
- Cointelegraph reporting on the Covid-era price dynamics and BTC’s subsequent rally to multi-year highs.
- Link to tokenized Gold price (PAX Gold USD) cited in the market context of gold price benchmarks.
Bitcoin valuation signals and potential reversal
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) sits at a crossroads flagged by valuation comparisons and a momentum metric that has historically preceded meaningful moves. Samson Mow’s main contention is that BTC is notably undervalued relative to gold’s market cap and the broader money supply—an assessment grounded in quantitative gaps rather than pure sentiment. Specifically, he points to a calibration where Bitcoin’s current level is roughly 24% to 66% below its trend line when juxtaposed with gold’s market capitalization or the extent of global liquidity. By contrast, gold, a traditional hedge, is described as overextended in this framing.
The argument leans heavily on the BTC-to-gold Z-score, a gauge of how far the price of BTC deviates from its long-run average when measured against gold. At the moment, the Z-score hovers around -1.24, indicating BTC is below its historical mean but not in territory that has inexorably presaged a parabolic rally. In the past, however, the same metric has signaled powerful reversals: during November 2022, the ratio’s Z-score dipped beneath -3, a backdrop that preceded a roughly 150% advance in BTC over the following year as traders digested the FTX collapse and the broader liquidity environment.
Historical analogies are a recurring feature of crypto markets, and the Covid-19 period is often cited in tandem with the Z-score narrative. In March 2020, the metric slipped below -2 and BTC carved a bottom near $3,717 before staging a multi-hundred percent recovery in the subsequent 12 months, culminating in the 2021 rally that took prices to the vicinity of $69,000. Those episodes illustrate how valuation gaps paired with macro stress can coincide with outsized upside if demand returns and risk appetite stabilizes.
Yet the current cycle carries its own wrinkles. Some analysts project further downside as investors absorb macro uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, with price targets that contemplate a move toward the $50,000 area. Others maintain that the combination of a reversion toward historical norms in BTC’s valuation relative to gold and a renewed willingness to allocate capital to crypto assets could spark a fresh leg higher. The truth likely lies somewhere in between, shaped by how swiftly liquidity conditions normalize, how regulation evolves, and how much on-chain activity confirms sustained network utility.
The price backdrop remains fluid, with BTC trading in the mid- to high-$60,000s and a broader market environment that still rewards resilience and clear catalysts. If the underlying relationships continue to align with past cycles—valuation gaps closing, risk sentiment shifting, and liquidity improving—the potential for a renewed price impulse cannot be discounted. Conversely, if macro headwinds intensify or regulatory constraints tighten, the path could tilt toward range-bound behavior or further corrections. Investors should remain vigilant for shifts in the balance of fear and opportunity that have historically driven crypto volatility.
Race for the Champions League: Man Utd, Aston Villa, Liverpool, Chelsea, Brentford
12 Niche Fireball Tool Products (And What They’re Used For)
Belfast weather: Sunshine and showers predicted to start the week
-
Sports6 days agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Iris Top
-
Politics6 days agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Business5 days agoTrue Citrus debuts functional drink mix collection
-
Politics3 days agoITV enters Gaza with IDF amid ongoing genocide
-
Tech18 hours agoUnihertz’s Titan 2 Elite Arrives Just as Physical Keyboards Refuse to Fade Away
-
Sports2 days ago
The Vikings Need a Duck
-
Crypto World6 days agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Tech5 days agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting
-
NewsBeat1 day agoDubai flights cancelled as Brit told airspace closed ’10 minutes after boarding’
-
NewsBeat4 days agoCuba says its forces have killed four on US-registered speedboat | World News
-
NewsBeat1 day agoThe empty pub on busy Cambridge road that has been boarded up for years
-
NewsBeat4 days agoManchester Central Mosque issues statement as it imposes new measures ‘with immediate effect’ after armed men enter
-
NewsBeat7 hours ago‘Significant’ damage to boarded-up Horden house after fire
-
NewsBeat6 days ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
NewsBeat1 day agoAbusive parents will now be treated like sex offenders and placed on a ‘child cruelty register’ | News UK
-
NewsBeat5 days agoPolice latest as search for missing woman enters day nine
-
Business4 days agoDiscord Pushes Implementation of Global Age Checks to Second Half of 2026
-
Business3 days agoOnly 4% of women globally reside in countries that offer almost complete legal equality
-
Sports6 days ago2026 NFL mock draft: WRs fly off the board in first round entering combine week