Key Takeaways

• Reflection AI is pursuing funding that would value the Nvidia-backed company at $25 billion
• The AI startup aims to secure $2.5 billion, representing over three times its prior $8 billion assessment
• JPMorgan Chase may participate via its security-oriented investment division
• Founded by former Google DeepMind team members, Reflection AI develops open-source AI systems and developer tools
• The company focuses on sovereign AI collaborations with U.S. partner nations to challenge China’s AI advancement

Reflection AI, an artificial intelligence startup with Nvidia backing, is pursuing $2.5 billion in fresh capital at a $25 billion valuation, the Wall Street Journal reports. This represents more than a threefold increase from its approximately $8 billion valuation in its previous funding round.

Launched in 2024 by alumni of Google DeepMind, the venture specializes in creating AI solutions for software developers, such as coding assistance platforms. In collaboration with Nvidia, the company produces open-source artificial intelligence frameworks accessible to enterprises, governmental bodies, and academic institutions at no cost.

Nvidia has committed approximately $800 million to Reflection AI thus far. Beyond capital, the semiconductor giant actively facilitates customer introductions, including foreign governments seeking to establish independent AI infrastructure.

Reports indicate JPMorgan Chase is evaluating participation in this funding initiative through its security-centered investment arm. Disruptive, an existing backer, is anticipated to contribute additional capital as well.

Reflection AI has accumulated over $2 billion in total funding to date. However, the organization remains in early revenue generation stages.

National AI Infrastructure Strategy

Among Reflection AI’s most significant recent achievements is a partnership with South Korea’s Shinsegae Group to develop Korean-language artificial intelligence frameworks. This initiative will operate on thousands of Nvidia processors.

The startup intends to replicate this model across global markets. Its objective centers on becoming a leading provider of “sovereign AI” — artificial intelligence infrastructure developed and governed by individual nations or American allies.

This approach directly addresses competition with China’s accelerating AI development. U.S. policymakers have prioritized establishing a domestic AI infrastructure, with Reflection AI positioned as a central component of this initiative.

Open-Source Models and Nvidia’s Ecosystem Play

Reflection AI represents one of multiple startups working intimately with Nvidia to develop sophisticated AI frameworks optimized for its hardware architecture. These open frameworks offer flexibility for deployment across diverse sectors.

Nvidia’s engagement extends well beyond financial investment. The chipmaker proactively connects Reflection AI with prospective clients and assists in expanding its partnership ecosystem.

Financial analysts maintain optimistic projections for Nvidia. TipRanks shows the stock carries a Strong Buy consensus rating, supported by 41 buy recommendations and a single hold rating across the last three months. Analysts’ average price target of $273.34 suggests approximately 53% potential upside from present trading levels.

JPMorgan Chase’s prospective involvement creates an intriguing dynamic, connecting two influential financial sector participants — a banking institution and a chip manufacturer — to a single AI company’s expansion trajectory.

Despite being established less than two years ago, Reflection AI has secured billions in investment commitments and forged partnerships spanning multiple nations.

• Ethereum (ETH) price shows early signs of a potential bullish trend reversal.
• On-chain data suggests accumulation and weakening selling pressure.
• A break above $2,300 could trigger further upside momentum.

Ethereum has slipped below the $2,200 mark, but the broader picture suggests something more interesting is unfolding beneath the surface.

The recent dip reflects short-term weakness, although it does not fully capture the growing signals pointing toward a potential shift in trend.

While the price action over the past week shows mild selling pressure, zooming out reveals that Ethereum is still holding onto gains built over the last month.

This creates a mixed environment where caution and optimism exist side by side.

On-chain signals a possible rebound

One of the most notable indicators is the MVRV ratio, which recently dipped into a zone that has historically marked undervaluation.

This level often appears when investors are sitting on losses, a condition that tends to precede accumulation.

In simple terms, weaker hands exit while stronger hands quietly step in.

Momentum indicators are also starting to shift in favour of buyers.

A key trend-following signal has flipped bullish for the first time in months, suggesting that selling pressure may be losing strength.

This does not guarantee an immediate rally, but it does indicate that the balance between buyers and sellers is beginning to change.

At the same time, Ethereum has been trading within an ascending triangle on the weekly chart, a structure that often leads to a breakout.

As Ethereum $ETH recovers, these are the MVRV Pricing Bands that could act as resistance:

• $2,356
• $2,647
• $3,639
• $4,632
• $5,624https://t.co/DSj59wXjWE

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) March 25, 2026

Advertisement

Such patterns do not always resolve upward, but when combined with improving on-chain data, the probability of a bullish outcome increases.

Bitcoin’s quantum-resistance lag supports a rebound

Beyond technicals, a longer-term narrative is quietly gaining traction in the background.

Concerns around quantum computing and its potential impact on blockchain security are starting to enter the conversation.

In a recent post on X, Nic Carter, the founding partner at Castle Island Ventures, stated, “The only thing that matters is how quickly blockchain developers recognise that they need to bake in cryptographic mutability into their networks.”

While this threat remains distant, it is serious enough to influence how investors think about the future.

The key difference lies in how networks are preparing for it.

Ethereum appears to be moving toward adapting its cryptographic systems over time, with plans that acknowledge the need for future upgrades.

Bitcoin, on the other hand, faces a more complex path due to its conservative approach to change.

This contrast could eventually shape investor perception.

If Ethereum is seen as more adaptable, it may gain an edge in long-term positioning.

Narratives like this do not move markets overnight, but they often build slowly before having a powerful impact.

In this case, the idea of being “future-ready” could become a meaningful driver of demand.

The targets in case of a bullish reversal

For now, price levels remain the clearest guide for what happens next.

Ethereum is currently trading below a key resistance zone that sits just above $2,355.

A clean break above this level would be the first strong sign that buyers are regaining control.

If that happens, analysts note that the next target to watch lies around $$2,525.

These levels have previously acted as barriers and are likely to attract attention again.

Beyond that, the path opens toward the higher ranges last seen during previous rallies.

However, none of this unfolds unless the market confirms the shift.

On the downside, support around $1,939 remains critical.

A drop below that level would weaken the bullish case and suggest that more time is needed before any sustained recovery.

Bitcoin Depot has named former MoneyGram chief executive Alex Holmes as its new chief executive as the crypto ATM operator faces growing pressure from US regulators. 

The leadership change comes as several states step up action against crypto kiosk companies over scam losses, fees, and compliance controls.

Bitcoin Depot said on Tuesday that Scott Buchanan stepped down as chief executive effective immediately after less than three months in the role. In a regulatory filing, the company said his resignation ”was not due [to] a disagreement.”

The company appointed Alex Holmes, who already served on the board, as chief executive and chair. Holmes spent 16 years at MoneyGram in senior roles, including chief financial officer and chief executive, where compliance and regulated payments were central parts of the business. He said,

”As I step into the role, my priorities are operational stability, regulatory progress, and accelerating the Company’s evolution into a more diversified fintech platform.”

The management change arrived as Bitcoin Depot faces action in several states. In Connecticut, the state banking regulator suspended the company’s money transmission license and issued a temporary cease-and-desist order on March 9, citing alleged violations that included excessive fees, weak compliance, and incomplete refunds to scam victims.

Massachusetts also sued Bitcoin Depot in February. State officials alleged the company overcharged consumers, failed to take proper steps against scam activity, and refused some refunds. Maine and Missouri also took action earlier this year, while Iowa sued Bitcoin Depot and CoinFlip in 2025 over claims that scammers moved millions of dollars through their kiosks.

Bitcoin Depot also said founder Brandon Mintz moved from executive chair to a non-executive board role and will serve as an adviser to Holmes. The company is now trying to steady operations while its compliance position remains under review in several markets.

Earlier this month, Bitcoin Depot cut its 2026 outlook and said revenue could fall 30% to 40% because of what it called a ”dynamic regulatory environment.” Shares closed Wednesday at $2.62, down 6.6% for the day, though the stock rose after hours. The company’s shares are down sharply from their June 2024 peak.

Crypto ATM scrutiny keeps rising

Regulators across the US have increased attention on crypto ATMs as fraud cases grow. Industry reports and state enforcement actions have tied the machines to scam complaints, especially cases involving older consumers and high fees.

That backdrop makes Holmes’ compliance record a central part of Bitcoin Depot’s next phase. The company now faces pressure to improve controls while protecting its position in the crypto ATM market.

Corporate bitcoin BTC$69,935.75 buying has narrowed to a single company, and the trade that was supposed to broaden the asset’s institutional base is now a concentration risk.

Strategy, the largest corporate bitcoin holder in the world, purchased roughly 45,000 BTC over the past 30 days, its fastest accumulation pace since April 2025, according to a CryptoQuant report published this week.

Every other treasury company combined bought approximately 1,000 BTC in the same period, a 99% decline from a peak of 69,000 BTC in August last year. Their share of total purchases has collapsed to 2%, from 95% at the height of the trade.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy now holds roughly 76% of all bitcoin held by treasury companies, according to CryptoQuant data.

The numbers confirm what Galaxy Digital warned about last summer. In a July report, Galaxy argued that the digital asset treasury company model was fundamentally a liquidity derivative that worked only as long as equities traded at a premium to their underlying bitcoin holdings.

Once those premiums compressed, the flywheel would reverse: lower prices would shrink net asset values, squeeze out the equity premium, and make share issuance dilutive rather than accretive.

That scenario has played out almost exactly as described.

In July and August of 2025, the DATCO summer when these companies were accumulating, BTC was trading north of $110,000. Now, it’s trading under $70,000, according to CoinDesk market data, as it slowly recovers from the crash of October 10.

Companies that bought aggressively near the cycle top, including Metaplanet and Nakamoto Holdings, carried average costs above $107,000 as of December, according to Galaxy’s analysis, putting them deep underwater at current prices.

Strategy has moved to insulate itself, disclosing in December a $1.44 Billion cash reserve with the goal to eventually build this up to a point to cover 24 months of dividend and interest obligations.

That defensive posture has not slowed its buying. But the CryptoQuant data makes clear that no other firm is keeping pace, and most have stopped trying.

The result is a far more concentrated demand profile than the market was promised.

At Bitcoin Asia in Hong Kong last summer, treasury firms pitched themselves as a scalable new class of corporate buyers that could absorb bitcoin supply and outperform passive exposure.

For now, that vision has narrowed to a single balance sheet.

Key Highlights

• Shares of Intel and AMD each climbed approximately 7% following revelations of upcoming CPU price increases between 10% and 15%
• According to Nikkei Asia, both semiconductor manufacturers informed clients that pricing adjustments would take effect beginning in March and April
• Intel attributed the price changes to “sustained demand, increased component and material costs” among other factors
• These adjustments represent the latest in a series of price hikes implemented throughout the current year, accompanied by extended delivery timelines
• The wider semiconductor sector index advanced 1%, with notable gains for Nvidia, Marvell, and Qualcomm

Shares of Intel and AMD experienced significant upward momentum on Wednesday following revelations that both semiconductor manufacturers are implementing price increases across their central processing unit portfolios. The announcement propelled both companies to the forefront of the S&P 500’s top-performing stocks for the trading session.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., AMD

According to a report published by Nikkei Asia, both Intel and AMD have communicated upcoming pricing adjustments to their customer base for their CPU product ranges. These modifications are scheduled to commence during March and April, with typical increases falling within the 10% to 15% range. Certain product categories may experience even more substantial price adjustments.

Intel validated these developments in an official statement provided to Investopedia. A company representative indicated that the pricing modifications account for “sustained demand, increased component and material costs, and evolving market dynamics.” AMD has not yet provided commentary on the matter.

Intel shares appreciated by approximately 7% during Wednesday’s trading session. The stock has accumulated nearly 20% in gains year-to-date for 2026, fueled partly by positive sentiment surrounding governmental backing for domestic semiconductor production and speculation regarding potential new customer partnerships.

AMD’s stock similarly advanced roughly 7% during the session. Nevertheless, the shares remained down approximately 4% for the year prior to Wednesday’s trading. Market participants have expressed reservations about AMD’s competitive positioning against Nvidia within the artificial intelligence chip sector.

Factors Behind the Semiconductor Pricing Surge

This latest round of price adjustments marks not the initial instance where Intel and AMD have implemented pricing increases during the current year. Both organizations have already executed multiple price elevations throughout 2026, as supply chain limitations have intensified. Lead times for product delivery have similarly extended, based on information from the Nikkei Asia report.

Chip demand has maintained its robustness across consumer and enterprise segments alike. Elevated pricing combined with consistent demand patterns could enhance revenue generation and profitability margins for both semiconductor manufacturers.

The PHLX Semiconductor Index recorded a 1% gain on Wednesday. Nvidia, Marvell Technology, and Qualcomm similarly posted advances alongside Intel and AMD.

Wider Market Dynamics Contributed to Stock Performance

Beyond semiconductor-specific developments, broader equity markets trended upward on Wednesday. S&P 500 futures contracts increased approximately 0.6% following news reports indicating the U.S. had formulated a proposal to cease hostilities in the Middle East region.

Crude oil valuations declined 5% to trade beneath the $100 per barrel threshold. This development alleviated certain concerns regarding energy-related inflationary pressures, which had weighed on technology sector equities in recent trading periods.

AMD benefited from additional company-specific positive catalysts. The organization recently unveiled an agreement with Meta for the deployment of 6 gigawatts worth of graphics processing units. This partnership contributed to favorable investor sentiment regarding AMD’s business trajectory.

Intel’s shares began Wednesday’s session carrying robust year-to-date upward momentum, whereas AMD was working to regain previously lost valuation. The CPU pricing increase revelations provided simultaneous upward impetus for both stocks during the same trading day.

Processor delivery lead times have expanded in tandem with the price increases, based on the Nikkei Asia reporting, indicating more constrained supply dynamics throughout the semiconductor industry.

Swan Bitcoin has asked a New York court for permission to subpoena Cantor Fitzgerald and its former chief executive, Howard Lutnick, as part of a legal fight over a failed Bitcoin mining venture. 

The request links the dispute to Swan’s claims that former employees left the company, took internal material, and later worked with Tether on a competing operation.

Swan filed the application in the Southern District of New York on Monday. The company said it wants discovery from Cantor Fitzgerald and Lutnick because they may hold documents tied to Swan’s former mining business with Tether, known as 2040 Energy.

The case comes from a lawsuit Swan filed in September 2024 against several former staff members. Swan claimed the group resigned, took confidential documents, and then launched Proton Management days later. The company also alleged that the former employees pushed Tether to end its relationship with Swan and back their new venture instead.

Swan’s filing said Cantor Fitzgerald may have knowledge of events surrounding the sale of Swan’s mining assets to a Tether subsidiary. Swan argued that Cantor’s advisory role with Tether and its work in Bitcoin mining may place it near documents relevant to the dispute.

The filing also drew attention because Lutnick now serves as US secretary of commerce. Swan’s move comes as Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren, continue to question Lutnick over possible conflicts tied to Tether. Swan has not accused Lutnick of wrongdoing in the filing described here, but it said his records may matter to the case.

Moreover, Swan chief executive Cory Klippsten said he met Lutnick in June 2024 while Swan was considering an initial public offering. Swan said Cantor Fitzgerald wanted to serve as lead investment banker, and during those talks the company shared a “highly confidential and proprietary slide deck” and showed its mining facilities.

Klippsten later said Cantor stopped communicating with Swan after the employee exits and the disputed asset transfer. He wrote that Cantor “broke off contact” with Swan without explanation. 

Former employees reject Swan’s claims

Swan said former business development head Michael Holmes and former chief investment officer Raphael Zagury organized what it called the “rain and hellfire” plan. Zagury later became Proton’s chief executive, according to Swan’s court claims.

The defendants have denied Swan’s allegations. They argued that 2040 Energy did not belong to Swan because Tether fully funded the venture. The lawsuit against Proton Management remains ongoing.

The Reserve Bank of Australia has moved closer to backing real-world asset tokenization as part of its future market strategy. 

The shift follows new Project Acacia findings that tokenized finance and related infrastructure could add about 24 billion Australian dollars, or $16.7 billion, to the economy each year.

Assistant Governor Brad Jones said the debate has moved beyond whether tokenization belongs in Australia’s financial system. He said the focus is now on how it should be introduced and tested in a practical way.

In his March 25 speech, Jones said, 

”We no longer see the main question as whether tokenisation has a future in Australia’s financial system, but rather, how.” 

He also referred to industry views that tokenized finance and related infrastructure changes could be ”revolutionary.”

Project Acacia is a joint research effort led by the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre with support from public agencies and industry groups. It builds on earlier central bank digital currency work and studies whether tokenized assets can improve how Australia’s wholesale financial markets operate.

Jones said the estimated economic gain from tokenization is about A$24 billion a year, with room for more if new markets develop. The DFCRC report linked those gains to better market efficiency, faster settlement, and broader use of digital finance infrastructure.

In addition, Jones said the RBA will work with agencies and industry groups to explore a new digital financial market infrastructure sandbox. The proposed testing environment would give firms and policymakers a controlled space to trial tokenized assets, tokenized money, and new settlement systems.

He said the next phase will examine how wholesale CBDC, bank deposit tokens, and stablecoins could work together. The RBA also wants to study how tokenized asset ledgers can connect with the Reserve Bank Information and Transfer System.

Global tokenization market keeps growing

Australia’s move comes as the wider tokenized asset market continues to expand. McKinsey has projected tokenized assets could approach $2 trillion by 2030, while Australia’s securities regulator has already urged the country to move early rather than fall behind.

Market data also shows continued growth in onchain real-world assets. RWA.xyz listed distributed asset value at about $26.6 billion on March 26, excluding stablecoins, showing that tokenization activity remains on an upward path.

TLDR:

• A federal court certified a class action covering Nvidia investors between August 10, 2017, and November 15, 2018.
  
• Plaintiffs allege Nvidia hid over $1 billion in crypto-related GPU sales within its gaming revenue segment.
  
• Nvidia’s stock dropped nearly 28.5% in two sessions after CFO Colette Kress disclosed crypto inventory issues.
  
• The SEC previously fined Nvidia $5.5 million in 2022 for failing to disclose crypto mining’s effect on revenue.

Nvidia now faces a certified class action lawsuit tied to alleged crypto mining revenue concealment. A U.S. federal court ruled Wednesday that investors may pursue the case as a group.

The lawsuit covers shareholders who purchased Nvidia stock between August 10, 2017, and November 15, 2018. Plaintiffs allege the company hid over $1 billion in crypto-linked GPU sales within its gaming segment. A case conference is now set for April 21.

Court Rules Against Nvidia on Price Impact

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. of California federal court issued the ruling on Wednesday. He found that Nvidia failed to prove its disclosures had no effect on its stock price.

An internal email from an Nvidia vice president played a key role in the decision. The executive reportedly expressed the view that the stock remained high because of earlier statements.

The court stated it could not conclude there was “no price impact in the face of such evidence.” This ruling allows the certified class of investors to move the case forward together.

Nvidia had previously argued that crypto mining accounted for only a small part of its business. The company also claimed most mining-related sales were tracked separately from its gaming division.

However, plaintiffs alleged that a large share of crypto-driven revenue flowed through GeForce gaming GPUs. Most of that revenue was reportedly recorded within Nvidia’s gaming segment.

This exposed the company to volatility tied to crypto market cycles, according to the complaint. The court found that argument persuasive enough to allow the case to proceed.

In 2022, the SEC separately fined Nvidia $5.5 million for failing to disclose crypto mining’s effect on its business. After a 2021 dismissal, the investor lawsuit was later revived on appeal. It also survived a failed bid at the Supreme Court. The case now advances as a certified class action.

Crypto Exposure and the Road to Trial

Nvidia’s crypto exposure became clearer through a series of disclosures made during 2018. In August, the company cut guidance, acknowledged excess inventory, and noted that crypto demand had dropped.

Then on November 15, 2018, CFO Colette Kress said gaming revenue was “short of expectations as post crypto channel inventory took longer than expected to sell through.” She added that gaming card prices “took longer than expected to normalize” following the “sharp crypto falloff.”

Following the November disclosure, Nvidia’s stock dropped approximately 28.5% over the next two trading sessions. Plaintiffs identified that date as the point when the company’s exposure became fully apparent to investors.

Those events form a central part of the timeline presented in the class action. Shareholders who bought Nvidia stock before that period are covered under the suit.

Class certification allows investors to pursue the case as a group rather than individually. It does not determine whether Nvidia is liable for any wrongdoing.

However, it marks a meaningful step toward a potential trial. The April 21 conference will allow the judge to outline the next procedural steps.

Renz Chong, CEO of modular on-chain platform Sovrun, noted the ruling sends a clear message. He said courts will not accept “segment-level reporting as a shield” when revenue carries a different risk profile than what investors are told.

Chong added that companies must “get ahead of the disclosure gap now, or litigate it later.” He warned that when markets correct, regulators will examine “what management knew, when they knew it, and what they told the public.”