Connect with us

Crypto World

Charles Hoskinson Slams CLARITY Act as ‘Horrific’ Bill

Published

on

Charles Hoskinson Slams CLARITY Act as ‘Horrific’ Bill


Charles Hoskinson says the CLARITY Act will create a “security by default” trap for new cryptocurrency projects.

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has launched a blistering attack on the CLARITY Act, the flagship U.S. crypto market structure bill, labeling it a “horrific trash bill” that would classify nearly all digital assets as securities by default and hand a “weaponized” Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the power to stifle the industry for years.

His comments deepen a growing split among crypto leaders as lawmakers push to finalize the rules before the midterm cycle intensifies.

Advertisement

Dismantling the Bill’s Mechanics

In a March 3 YouTube broadcast, Hoskinson moved beyond political rhetoric to present a detailed, technical critique of H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.

He argued that the bill, as drafted, creates a regulatory Catch-22 that would be “a wet dream” for an adversarial SEC. The core of his argument rests on the bill’s “security by default” framework for newly created digital assets.

He asserted that under this structure, every new project, from XRP and Ethereum at their launches to any future protocol, would be classified as an “investment contract asset” and fall under SEC jurisdiction.

The path to graduating to a “digital commodity” regulated by the CFTC, the developer warned, is a bureaucratic minefield. He outlined several “attack vectors” where the SEC could exploit rulemaking authority to indefinitely trap projects in security status, including impossible-to-prove standards for decentralization and subjective “value attribution” tests.

Advertisement

“This is not a good bill,” Hoskinson said. “Through rulemaking, it can become horrific and weaponized and it doesn’t cover the core of what’s going on in the industry right now.”

He stressed that while established projects like Cardano and XRP might be “grandfathered in,” the legislation would force all future American crypto innovation to launch overseas, effectively killing the domestic industry.

You may also like:

An Industry and Washington at an Impasse

While the CLARITY Act passed the House in 2025, it has stalled in the Senate. The White House had issued a March 1 deadline for stakeholders to bridge their differences, but the date passed with no public compromise reported.

The primary holdup, as Hoskinson noted, is not the structural issues he raised, but a fierce lobbying battle over stablecoin rewards, which the banking industry warned could trigger a massive exodus of deposits.

The divide has splintered the crypto industry, with Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, who has predicted a 90% chance of the bill becoming law by April, continuing to champion it, arguing that “clarity beats chaos” and that the industry cannot let “perfection be the enemy of progress.”

Advertisement

Ripple CTO David Schwartz also weighed in on the debate on X, acknowledging the tightrope walk, stating that while his company tries not to advocate to the detriment of others, “a sub-optimal bill is better than no bill at all.”

However, the Cardano founder countered that view, claiming that a bad bill would enshrine into law every single thing former SEC Chair Gary Gensler was “trying to do to the industry.”

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Prediction Markets Risk Trading Block in Nevada After Court Ruling

Published

on

Prediction Markets Risk Trading Block in Nevada After Court Ruling

A US federal court ruling has increased the risk that Nevada regulators could seek to halt prediction-market trading in the state after a judge sent a dispute involving Polymarket’s parent company Blockratize back to state court.

A federal judge rejected arguments that US regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fully preempts state gaming laws for prediction markets, according to a Monday order.

The judge found that the CEA’s savings clause does not completely displace state authority and that the companies had not shown a basis to block Nevada’s action at this stage.

The decision means the Nevada Gaming Control Board can continue pursuing its civil enforcement case in state court, where it could seek an injunction restricting Nevada residents from accessing event contracts offered by Polymarket or Kalshi.

Advertisement
Court filing in the case of Nevada vs. prediction markets. Source: Courtlistener.com

In response to the ruling, Polymarket’s parent company submitted a motion to request a brief administrative stay of the court’s remand order, the filing shows.

The motion is a legal request seeking to freeze a court ruling or enforcement action seen as a short-term emergency measure.

Related: Prediction markets emerge as speculative ‘arbitrage arena’ for crypto traders

Predictions markets face mounting pressure after Nevada ruling: Lawyer

The Nevada decision comes as prediction markets face mounting pressure from state regulators, including Kalshi, which has been fighting Nevada’s gaming regulator since 2025.

On Tuesday, a federal judge also remanded Nevada’s civil enforcement action against Kalshi back to state court, exposing Kalshi to an “imminent temporary restraining order” barring it from offering event contracts in the state, according to a court filing seen by sports betting and gaming-focused lawyer Daniel Wallach.

Advertisement

“The ruling could embolden other states to sue Kalshi in state court and seek injunctions to block event contracts, a strategy that has so far succeeded in every case brought,” wrote Wallach, in a Tuesday X post.

Source: Daniel Wallach

Kalshi sued the state of Nevada in March 2025 after receiving a cease-and-desist order to halt all sports-related betting markets within the state.

However, in February, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied Kalshi’s bid to stop Nevada’s gaming regulator from taking action on its sports event contracts.

Related: ‘Elite’ traders hunt dopamine-seeking retail on prediction markets: 10x Research

Insider trading concerns add to scrutiny

The legal fight is unfolding as prediction markets draw scrutiny over information advantage and potential insider activity.

Advertisement

Suspected insider wallets netted $1.2 million by betting on the outcome of blockchain sleuth ZachXBT’s investigation into Axiom, Cointelegraph reported on Friday.

ZachXBT released the much-anticipated investigation on Thursday, alleging that Axiom employee Broox Bauer and others had been responsible for insider trading activity since early 2025.

Top wallets betting on Axiom in ZachXBT’s insider exposé. Source: Dune

Insider trading concerns were first highlighted in January after a Polymarket account profited $400,000 after it placed a bet on a contract predicting that Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro would be captured, wagering the funds just hours before US forces captured him during a military operation.

Earlier in February, Israeli authorities arrested and indicted two people suspected of using secret information related to Israel striking Iran for insider trading on Polymarket.

Magazine: Train AI agents to make better predictions… for token rewards

Advertisement