Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Crypto PAC Fellowship halts support for Texas AG’s Senate bid

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Fellowship, a political action committee aligned with cryptocurrency interests, reportedly withdrew from a paid advertising arrangement intended to bolster Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in a pivotal U.S. Senate contest. The move, described by Axios, comes amid questions from Republican leaders about the PAC’s backers and its broader influence strategy in a high-stakes midterm cycle.

According to Axios, Republican lawmakers contacted U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over Fellowship’s links and funding sources. Fellowship has been described as having substantial financing from crypto-adjacent financiers, including partial backing from Cantor Fitzgerald. Lutnick—famed as a former president and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald with his sons now leading the firm’s financial services arm—has faced inquiries about Fellowship’s role in pausing or altering support for Paxton, who recently disclosed spending of about $1.75 million on supportive advertising. The expenditure, disclosed through the marketing firm Nxum Group to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), apparently was never executed.

Cointelegraph’s coverage notes that Fellowship disclosed the $1.75 million advertising plan to the FEC, and that the filing remained publicly accessible as of the latest reporting. The PAC did not respond to requests for comment at press time. In the broader crypto-political arena, this episode underscores how crypto-linked fundraising networks can become focal points for intra-party pressure and regulatory scrutiny, even when those networks are reportedly in flux or retracting active advertising commitments.

Beyond Fellowship, other crypto-aligned committees—such as Fairshake and additional groups—are anticipated to deploy substantial sums in U.S. midterm campaigns as part of a sustained effort to influence policy outcomes. The evolving dynamic illustrates how crypto-interest groups participate in political advocacy across party lines, even as campaign financing disclosures remain a central compliance concern for firms operating under U.S. election laws.

Advertisement

In Texas politics, Paxton failed to secure the nomination outright in a March primary against incumbent Senator John Cornyn and will face a runoff in May before the November general election. The eventual Republican candidate will contest Democrat James Talarico for one of the state’s U.S. Senate seats, a race closely watched for its potential regulatory and policy implications for the crypto sector at the national level.

Key takeaways

  • Fellowship reportedly halted a $1.75 million advertising commitment in support of Paxton, with the expenditure never placed as disclosed to the FEC.
  • The PAC’s funding profile includes Cantor Fitzgerald connections, prompting questions from Republican leadership about the sources and influence of crypto-aligned financing.
  • Public disclosures through the FEC and reporting by Axios highlight ongoing scrutiny of crypto-connected political committees and their coordination with party officials.
  • Crypto-interest groups are anticipated to deploy substantial resources in U.S. midterm elections, reflecting a broader strategy to shape regulatory and policy outcomes.
  • Separately, the regulatory landscape for crypto market structure remains contentious, with legislative action stalled amid procedural delays, ethics concerns, and questions about stablecoin yield.

Fellowship and the evolving crypto-political finance landscape

The Fellowship case sits at the intersection of campaign finance transparency and the broader push by crypto interests to influence public policy. The reported withdrawal from the Paxton ad buy, coupled with the disclosure of a sizable but possibly unexecuted expenditure, raises questions about how crypto-linked money is deployed in high-profile races and how party leadership responds when donors come under scrutiny. While crypto PACs historically fund candidates from both major parties, leadership in Congress has shown a renewed interest in ensuring that campaign contributions comply with legal standards and disclosure requirements. The underlying issue is less about partisan alignment and more about governance, accountability, and the risk profile associated with opaque funding streams in a rapidly evolving industry.

From a regulatory perspective, the episode underscores the ongoing need for robust AML/KYC controls and financing-disclosure frameworks within the crypto ecosystem and in relation to political contributions. For institutions embedded in or adjacent to crypto markets—exchanges, liquidity providers, and financial firms—these dynamics amplify the importance of transparent, auditable political-financial relationships and the potential implications for licensing, oversight, and compliance programs. The U.S. election-laws regime, enforced by the FEC and related bodies, governs such disclosures independently of the sector-specific regulatory agenda, but it interacts with broader policy initiatives that govern crypto market function and corporate governance standards.

Market-structure reform: momentum, obstacles, and policy context

Separately, the legislative trajectory of crypto market-structure reform remains a focal point for industry participants and policymakers. Since mid-2025, the Senate has contemplated a comprehensive market-structure bill that would shape how digital assets are traded, cleared, and regulated. The GENIUS Act, which addresses stablecoins and related settlement mechanisms, represents a key component of the broader policy framework. Delays have persisted due to government-operations constraints, ethics reviews, and unsettled questions around stablecoin yield models. No full-chamber vote has been scheduled for the principal market-structure package as of the latest updates.

In response, more than 120 entities affiliated with the crypto and blockchain sectors urged Senate Banking Committee leaders to expedite consideration and to proceed to a markup. A markup would be a critical step toward unlocking a formal debate and potential floor vote on the CLARITY Act, the overarching market-structure measure. The push reflects a broader and growing consensus among industry groups that timely legislative action is essential to provide regulatory clarity, preserve financial stability, and reduce legal risk for participants operating across borders and across banking rails.

Advertisement

The policy environment continues to be shaped by the balance of political power in Washington. With Republicans holding a narrow Senate majority since early 2025, the dynamic has favored quicker movement on certain pro-crypto measures, including stablecoins regimes and licensing frameworks. However, a shift in control after the 2026 midterms could alter the legislative calculus and affect how crypto markets are regulated, taxed, and integrated with traditional banking systems. The ongoing debate centers on how to harmonize innovation with consumer protection, systemic risk mitigation, and cross-border regulatory harmonization—issues that regulatory bodies and market participants monitor closely.

The current push to advance market-structure legislation sits within this broader regulatory landscape. If enacted, the package would influence not only trading venues and liquidity provisioning but also enforcement priorities for agencies such as the SEC, CFTC, and DOJ, and would feed into compliance frameworks for custodians, broker-dealers, and settlement infrastructures. The stakes extend to stablecoins and the broader issue of how crypto assets are treated for prudential supervision and retail protections, including the implications for banking relationships and access to traditional financial rails.

For observers, the convergence of political finance, regulatory advocacy, and legislative timing underscores the interconnectedness of policy design and market structure in crypto. The path forward will likely hinge on the ability of lawmakers to reconcile divergent views on risk, innovation, and enforcement while maintaining a transparent, predictable framework for industry participants and investors alike.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This coverage reflects the outlet’s editorial standards and aims to present timely information that supports analysis, compliance review, and institutional decision-making. Readers should verify details through official filings and primary sources as developments unfold.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Here’s why Zcash price rallied over 10% today

Published

on

Zcash price 24-hour/USDT chart.

Zcash price rallied nearly 12% on Friday, continuing its recent uptrend as buying interest picked up again after a brief pullback earlier this week.

Summary

  • Zcash price climbed nearly 12% to around $360, rebounding from $300 support as buying interest returned.
  • Rising demand for privacy coins and increased shielded pool usage helped strengthen investor sentiment.
  • Technicals show bullish momentum, with price testing $350 resistance and eyeing a move toward $400.

According to data from crypto.news, Zcash (ZEC) rose to an intraday high close to $360 before easing slightly to trade around $350 at the time of writing. The move comes after the token found support near the $300 level, where buyers stepped in to defend the downside.

The latest rally appears to be driven by a mix of fresh demand and improving technical structure. After holding key support zones during its recent dip, Zcash has started to attract traders looking to position for a continuation move higher.

Advertisement

A key factor behind the renewed interest is the steady demand for privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. With growing attention on blockchain transparency and regulation, some investors are rotating into assets that offer stronger transaction confidentiality, which has helped lift sentiment around Zcash.

At the same time, activity within Zcash’s shielded ecosystem continues to support its outlook. The increasing share of coins held in shielded pools has effectively reduced liquid supply, which can amplify price moves when demand rises.

The token is also tracking the broader market recovery, with improving sentiment across crypto helping altcoins regain momentum after recent volatility.

If the current trend holds, traders will be watching whether Zcash can push toward the $400 level, which remains a key psychological barrier.

Advertisement

Zcash price analysis

On the daily chart, Zcash price has bounced from the 50% Fibonacci retracement level near $293, confirming it as a strong support zone.

Zcash price 24-hour/USDT chart.
Zcash price 24-hour/USDT chart — April 24 | Source: crypto.news

It is now testing resistance around the 78.6% Fibonacci level near $350. A clean break above this level could see the price move back toward the recent high near $390.

The Supertrend indicator has stayed in bullish territory, suggesting the uptrend remains intact. Meanwhile, the RSI is sitting around 64, showing steady buying pressure without signs of extreme overheating.

On the downside, a drop below the $316 level, which aligns with the 0.618 Fibonacci support, could lead to a pullback toward the $293 zone.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase to list Fluent (BLEND) spot pair against USD

Published

on

Epstein files show crypto ties to Coinbase, Blockstream: DOJ

Coinbase is rolling out a BLEND–USD spot pair for Fluent’s newly launched token, joining KuCoin and MEXC in a coordinated listing that could turn the tiny‑cap altcoin into a high‑beta volatility play.

Summary

  • Coinbase plans to launch spot trading for Fluent (BLEND), with the BLEND–USD pair expected to go live today once liquidity conditions are met.
  • The listing follows Coinbase’s earlier move to enable BLEND deposit address generation and comes alongside listings on KuCoin and MEXC, boosting access to the new altcoin.
  • Fluent’s mainnet launch and partnership with major exchanges position BLEND as a high‑beta token likely to see sharp price swings once trading opens.

Coinbase is preparing to launch spot trading for Fluent’s BLEND token, adding a BLEND–USD pair to its platform as early as today, subject to sufficient order-book liquidity. The decision places BLEND on the largest regulated crypto exchange in the United States by trading volume, signaling that demand for fresh altcoin listings remains strong despite a choppy market backdrop.

In an update on its listings page, Coinbase confirmed support for Fluent (BLEND) and said users in eligible regions can already generate deposit addresses, though deposits only become active once the asset issuer enables transfers. “Spot trading for BLEND will allow users to buy and sell the token directly on the platform, as opposed to derivative or futures-based exposure,” Coinbase’s listing note states, underscoring that the asset will be available in the cash market rather than via leveraged products.

Advertisement

New altcoin, thin float, high volatility risk

Fluent is a web3 platform whose native token, BLEND, is designed to sit at the center of its ecosystem for functions such as payments, governance, and incentives. According to CryptoRank, Coinbase is acting as a “primary launch platform” for BLEND as part of a wider collaboration focused on token distribution, developer onboarding, and educational content.

The timing aligns with BLEND’s initial exchange rollout, with MEXC and KuCoin both scheduling BLEND/USDT spot markets to open at 13:00 UTC on April 24, 2026, while Bybit has teased a forthcoming listing. Social posts from BSCNews noted that “leading exchanges @Coinbase and @krakenfx have scheduled $BLEND spot trading to begin today, April 24, 2026, once liquidity conditions are met,” highlighting a coordinated launch across multiple venues.

On-chain and order-book data suggest traders should brace for heavy volatility. A recent flow analysis from Streetbrief put BLEND’s market capitalization at roughly $1.85 million with only about $783 in 24‑hour volume ahead of the Coinbase listing, an “extremely illiquid” profile that can magnify both upside and downside moves when fresh demand hits.

Advertisement

Analysts expect that access via a BLEND–USD pair on Coinbase could pull in U.S.-based retail flow seeking high‑beta exposure, but warn that thin float and tight liquidity bands make the token particularly vulnerable to sharp intraday spikes and drawdowns in its early trading sessions.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

South Africa moves to pull crypto into strict capital flow rules

Published

on

South Africa moves to pull crypto into strict capital flow rules

South Africa’s 2026 capital flow draft recasts crypto as “capital,” tightening FX controls with declarations, approvals and sanctions as Africa’s biggest market matures.

Summary

  • South Africa’s National Treasury has published draft 2026 capital flow regulations that formally bring crypto assets inside the country’s foreign exchange control regime.
  • The rules would align South Africa with OECD and FATF standards, tighten oversight of cross‑border crypto transfers, and introduce new declaration, reporting, and sanction powers.
  • The proposal lands as South Africa cements its role as Africa’s largest crypto market, with an estimated $35 billion in annual on‑chain volume and a sector value above $11 billion.

South Africa’s National Treasury has released its Draft Capital Flow Management Regulations for 2026, a sweeping overhaul that explicitly classifies crypto assets as “capital” and pulls them into the country’s foreign exchange control framework for the first time. The proposal, published on April 17 and now open for public comment, aims to replace the 1961 Exchange Control Regulations and align South Africa’s regime with recommendations from the OECD and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on combating money laundering, terrorist financing, and illicit financial flows.

According to the draft, crypto assets are now treated as a channel through which capital can be imported and exported, placing them alongside foreign currency, gold, and securities rather than outside the regulatory perimeter. National Treasury and the South African Reserve Bank said in a joint statement that the amendments are intended “to address gaps in the current regulations, including in relation to cross‑border crypto asset transactions,” and to remove “any ambiguity regarding the declaration of foreign assets.”

Advertisement

Prior approval, declarations, and tougher sanctions

The new framework introduces authorised crypto asset service providers, transaction thresholds, mandatory declarations, and stiffer administrative sanctions for non‑compliance. In practice, this could mean that certain cross‑border crypto transfers will require prior approval from authorities, while residents and visitors may have to declare digital asset holdings above thresholds set by the finance minister, with the risk of seizure or forced sale if they fail to do so.

Bitcoin.com reported that draft rules “require visitors to declare crypto or face up to 5 years in prison,” and grant border officials powers to search devices for coins such as Bitcoin and other tokens suspected of being moved in violation of capital controls. Business Insider Africa added that the same regulations could “require residents to declare and sell certain crypto, gold and foreign currency holdings to the National Treasury” if they exceed those thresholds.

National Treasury insists the overhaul does not amount to a ban on digital assets but a modernization of control tools. “The policy emphasis shifts away from transaction‑by‑transaction pre‑approval towards reporting, traceability and risk‑based oversight, particularly in relation to illicit financial flows and capital flight,” the South African Institute of Taxation wrote in a commentary, describing the approach as a “pragmatic acknowledgment that value now moves across borders digitally.”

Advertisement

Africa’s largest crypto market under tighter watch

The timing is significant for a country that has emerged as the continent’s biggest crypto hub by volume and venture funding. Chainalysis data cited by Mariblock show that Sub‑Saharan Africa received more than $205 billion in on‑chain value between July 2024 and June 2025, with South Africa accounting for about $35 billion of that total, second only to one other market in the region.

Market research from IMARC Group estimates that South Africa’s cryptocurrency market reached roughly $11.18 billion in 2024, driven by both speculative trading and real‑world use cases such as remittances and hedging against domestic currency volatility. A CV VC report highlighted that the country captured 18% of all African blockchain venture capital, with blockchain deals representing 7.4% of total VC funding on the continent — more than double its approximate 3.2% share globally.

Those figures, combined with South Africa’s exit from the FATF grey list in late 2025 and preparations for the next assessment cycle starting mid‑2026, help explain the urgency behind the draft. Treasury officials argue the rules are a “vital prerequisite” for modernizing the financial architecture and shutting down channels for illicit flows, even as critics warn they could chill innovation and push activity into less regulated jurisdictions if implemented heavy‑handedly.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

$178M in crypto liquidations as longs and shorts both get squeezed

Published

on

Techno Revenant unlocks $93.7M HYPE stake, stoking whale-watch jitters

$178M in crypto liquidations over 24 hours show a choppy, leverage‑heavy market where both long and short traders are getting whipsawed out of positions.

Crypto traders absorbed a fresh wave of forced deleveraging over the past day, with data from analytics platform Coinglass showing that total liquidations across major exchanges hit $178 million in 24 hours. Long positions accounted for roughly $92.15 million of that sum, while shorts made up about $85.88 million, a rare near‑parity that signals an exceptionally indecisive and whipsaw‑prone market structure.

The shakeout came as Bitcoin hovered near $77,487, down about 0.18% on the day, with more than $121 million in BTC futures positions liquidated over the same period, according to Coinglass’s BTC dashboard. Open interest in Bitcoin futures remains elevated at around $56.49 billion, suggesting leverage is still high even after the flush. Coinglass notes that it aggregates liquidation figures across perpetual swaps and dated futures on venues such as Binance, OKX, and Bybit to map total leverage washouts.

Advertisement

Range‑bound chop punishes both bulls and bears

The almost perfectly balanced split between long and short liquidations points to a market swinging back and forth within a tight range rather than trending decisively in one direction. When volatility spikes inside narrow bands and price repeatedly reverses around key levels, over‑leveraged traders on both sides can be wiped out in quick succession as stop‑losses and margin calls cascade through order books.

Coinglass’s long/short ratio indicators have flagged this tug‑of‑war dynamic for weeks, with futures positioning oscillating around parity rather than skewing clearly bullish or bearish on major pairs. That pattern often precedes large “breakout” moves once one side finally overwhelms the other, but in the interim it tends to produce exactly the kind of two‑sided liquidation profile seen in today’s $178 million tally.

For altcoins and smaller‑cap tokens, the impact can be even more violent, as thinner liquidity and higher funding‑rate sensitivity magnify forced selling and buying. With derivatives still driving a large share of total crypto trading volumes, the latest data underscores how quickly sentiment can flip — and how costly it can be to run high leverage in a market that has not yet chosen a clear direction.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hyperliquid whales park $3.66B as long/short ratio hovers near neutral

Published

on

Hyperliquid rolls out new testnet for prediction markets

Hyperliquid whales now hold $3.66B in nearly balanced perp positions, turning the on‑chain DEX into a real‑time gauge of institutional crypto sentiment.

Summary

  • Coinglass data shows whales on Hyperliquid now hold $3.66 billion in perpetual positions, with $1.854 billion in longs and roughly $1.8 billion in shorts.
  • The resulting long/short ratio of 1.03 signals an almost perfectly balanced book, underscoring how uncertain large traders are about the next major move.
  • The scale of these positions highlights Hyperliquid’s rise into the top tier of derivatives venues, with quarterly volumes in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Whale traders on Hyperliquid, one of the fastest‑growing on‑chain derivatives exchanges, are currently running $3.66 billion worth of open perpetual futures positions, according to fresh figures from Coinglass. Of that total, $1.854 billion, or 50.64%, is parked in long exposure, while roughly $1.8 billion sits in shorts, leaving a near‑neutral long/short ratio of 1.03 that reflects finely balanced conviction among the platform’s largest accounts.

Coinglass, which tracks whale activity on Hyperliquid through its dedicated whale tracker, notes that it aggregates large perpetual positions and marks them to market in real time to give traders “a better understanding of whale behavior and smarter trading decisions.” Its long/short ratio dashboard for Hyperliquid is designed to “quickly assess market sentiment and positioning, analyze trader behavior, and enhance risk control and trading strategy decisions,” making today’s almost symmetric split a clear signal of indecision rather than one‑sided speculation.

Advertisement

Hyperliquid cements role as on‑chain perps heavyweight

The sheer size of the $3.66 billion whale book underscores how Hyperliquid has evolved into a genuine institutional‑scale venue in the perpetual futures market. A recent MEXC research note highlighted that the exchange processed about $492.7 billion in derivatives volume in the first quarter of 2026, pushing it into the global top‑10 alongside incumbents such as Binance, OKX, and Bybit.

Separate analysis from IndexBox, citing data from Yahoo Finance, CryptoRank, and DefiLlama, said Hyperliquid handled roughly $40.7 billion in perp volume over a single seven‑day stretch, with about $9.57 billion in open interest — more than all major rival perp DEXs combined over the same window. In January 2026 alone, Hyperliquid facilitated over $208 billion in perpetual futures turnover, capturing 5.38% of total centralized exchange perpetual volume, its highest market share on record, according to a post by market analyst Jean‑Pierre Palomba‑Marin.

This combination of deep liquidity, fully on‑chain transparency, and large, nearly balanced whale positioning makes Hyperliquid a real‑time barometer of institutional‑level sentiment in crypto. With the long/short ratio hovering just above 1.0 and billions of dollars committed on both sides, the data suggest that big traders are positioned for volatility but not yet prepared to bet aggressively on either a sustained rally or a deeper drawdown.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

New Quantum Break Claim Sparks Bitcoin Security Debate

Published

on

New Quantum Break Claim Sparks Bitcoin Security Debate

A researcher has made a small but notable step toward breaking the cryptography that secures Bitcoin, but the claim has already sparked pushback over how meaningful the result really is.

Project Eleven said it awarded a 1 BTC “Q-Day Prize” to Giancarlo Lelli for deriving a private key from a public key using a quantum computer. 

A Tiny Quantum Break, a Big Debate Over What It Proves

The test used a 15-bit elliptic curve, far smaller than the 256-bit standard used by Bitcoin and most blockchains.

Advertisement

The firm described the result as the largest public demonstration yet of a quantum attack on elliptic curve cryptography. It said the work shows the threat is moving from theory into early execution.

However, the scale gap remains large. A 15-bit key has a search space of just over 32,000 possibilities. Bitcoin’s security relies on numbers so large they cannot be brute-forced with current machines.

Critics quickly challenged the claim. A community note on the announcement argued the method relied heavily on classical verification, not purely quantum computation. 

In simple terms, the quantum system may not have done the hardest part of the attack on its own.

Advertisement
Community Note on Project Eleven’s Claims

That distinction matters. True quantum attacks would use Shor’s algorithm to efficiently solve problems that secure digital signatures. Partial or hybrid approaches do not yet prove that capability at scale.

Still, the result adds to a pattern. Earlier demonstrations broke even smaller keys. At the same time, research suggests the hardware required to attack real-world cryptography may be lower than previously thought.

For Bitcoin, there is no immediate risk. Yet the debate highlights a longer-term issue. Upgrading cryptography across decentralized networks is slow and complex, even if safer alternatives already exist.

For now, the takeaway is narrow. Quantum progress is real, but its practical impact remains distant—and contested.

The post New Quantum Break Claim Sparks Bitcoin Security Debate appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

China Orders Three AI Giants to Reject US Investment

Published

on

China Orders Three AI Giants to Reject US Investment

Three top Chinese AI firms have been told to reject US-origin capital without government approval. The directive reshapes how Washington money reaches Beijing’s strategic technology champions.

The instructions were issued by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) in recent weeks. Bloomberg first reported the guidance on Friday.

Beijing Cuts Off US Capital For Its AI Giants

ByteDance, TikTok’s parent and China’s most valuable private startup, was told to block US secondary share sales without state clearance.

The instruction carries weight given ByteDance’s complex ownership structure and pool of US institutional backers. Any secondary liquidity now funnels through Beijing.

Advertisement

Moonshot AI, considering a Hong Kong listing, was told to refuse US capital in funding rounds and deals without approval.

The restriction complicates pre-IPO planning for a firm widely seen as China’s answer to OpenAI. Any foreign allocation will likely tilt toward Middle Eastern and Hong Kong investors.

StepFun, a Tencent-backed startup focused on multimodal and generative AI, received the same guidance as Moonshot. The company is less globally known but ranks among Beijing’s strategic AI champions.

Why China Is Gating Its AI Firms

The guidance follows Meta Platforms’ roughly $2 billion acquisition of Singapore-based Manus, a startup with deep Chinese engineering roots.

Advertisement

Beijing imposed exit restrictions on the co-founders of Manus and reviewed the deal for potential technology export violations.

On Wednesday, White House science director Michael Kratsios accused Chinese entities of running industrial-scale campaigns to extract US AI models.

“Foreign entities who build on such fragile foundations should have little confidence in the integrity and reliability of the models they produce,” he stated.

The Trump administration signaled new enforcement against firms using model distillation, according to reports.

Advertisement

The capital divide between Washington and Beijing looks set to deepen. Beijing may formalize the guidance into a published regulation over the coming weeks.

The post China Orders Three AI Giants to Reject US Investment appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

CLARITY Act deadline turns into Congress’s last real shot at crypto rules

Published

on

Key macro data puts crypto markets on watch as CPI, PCE and Fed speak

Senator Bernie Moreno’s end‑of‑May ultimatum has turned the CLARITY Act into Congress’s last credible chance this cycle to set U.S. crypto market‑structure rules before politics and bank lobbying slam the window shut.

Summary

  • Senator Bernie Moreno has given Congress until the end of May to pass the CLARITY Act, warning that missing the window could shelve U.S. digital asset legislation for years.
  • The bill still faces five major hurdles in just a few weeks, while bank lobbying intensifies against stablecoin yield provisions and Senate floor time is being chewed up by the Kevin Warsh Fed nomination fight.
  • Prediction markets now give the Act less than a 50% chance of becoming law in 2026, even as industry groups warn that innovation and capital are drifting toward friendlier jurisdictions like Dubai and Singapore.

At a Washington event on April 22, Senator Bernie Moreno (R‑Ohio) dropped the optimism and set a hard line: the CLARITY Act must clear Congress by the end of May or U.S. crypto market structure legislation is effectively dead for this cycle. “I think we’re going to get it done by the end of May,” he said, but he has also warned that if the bill isn’t passed by then, digital asset legislation “will likely be impossible” to advance for the foreseeable future as the midterm calendar takes over.

Moreno’s ultimatum comes as the Senate Banking Committee still hasn’t held a single formal vote on the package, even though the House approved its version 294–134 in July 2025 and the Senate Agriculture Committee cleared its own text back in January. As Disruption Banking and Galaxy Research have both mapped out, the bill must now run a five‑step gauntlet in a matter of weeks: a Banking Committee markup, a 60‑vote Senate floor passage, reconciliation with the Agriculture version, reconciliation with the House bill, and finally President Donald Trump’s signature.

Advertisement

Bank noise, DeFi text, and a shrinking calendar

If Moreno is playing bad cop on timing, he is even blunter on bank pushback around stablecoin yield. At the DC Blockchain Summit he dismissed the backlash outright: “There’s a lot of noise in the market, but most of it is fake,” he said, arguing that banks “also need to innovate” instead of trying to kill yield‑bearing stablecoin products in committee. His comments landed just as reports emerged that the North Carolina Bankers Association was urging member banks to call Senator Thom Tillis’s office to oppose a hard‑won stablecoin yield compromise.

On April 20, industry lobby group the Digital Chamber sent a formal letter to Senate leadership pressing for an immediate markup, warning that further delay would turn the CLARITY Act into another lost opportunity for market‑structure reform. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R‑Wyo) has said DeFi provisions in the bill are already finalized and called this “our last chance,” while Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad has publicly projected an April markup and a May floor vote if leadership moves.

“The US Senate Banking Committee is unlikely to consider the CLARITY Act, a bill to regulate the crypto market, in April. Discussion of the document may be postponed until May,” says Yuliya Barabash, founder and managing partner at the law firm SBSB Fintech Lawyers.

The main obstacle remains the regulation on rewards for storing stablecoins. Banking industry representatives fear that high returns from stablecoins will lead to an outflow of deposits from traditional institutions. This could undermine the financial stability of smaller institutions. According to Tillis, negotiators need more time to find a compromise between banks and crypto companies.

-Yulia Barabash

Advertisement

That schedule now runs head‑on into another priority: the nomination of Kevin Warsh as Trump’s pick to replace Jerome Powell as Fed chair, a process that is already burning Banking Committee time in late April. Every day the Warsh hearing occupies the agenda is a day the markup does not happen, and Congress is due to leave town for Memorial Day recess on May 21, leaving roughly three working weeks in May to get Democratic votes and clear a 60‑vote threshold on the floor.

Prediction markets flash amber as capital looks abroad

For traders, the legislative clock is now a tradable variable. On Polymarket, odds that the CLARITY Act is signed into law in 2026 climbed from around 38% to the mid‑40s after Moreno’s April 22 remarks, but remain far from a confident yes. One recent update pegged the “yes” probability at roughly 44%, even after earlier spikes above 80% when White House adviser Patrick Witt signaled that remaining hurdles were “toppling fast.” Finbold noted this week that expectations for 2026 passage have been “slashed” by about a third in just five days amid Senate delay.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has repeatedly warned that every month of U.S. dithering pushes digital asset innovation toward hubs like Dubai and Singapore, which are actively courting American crypto capital with clearer licensing, tax, and tokenization regimes. That warning is backed by hard numbers: Q1 2026 saw a record $297 billion in global venture funding, with growing slices aimed at crypto and AI‑adjacent infrastructure, while Y Combinator made its first stablecoin investment this April.

With or without the CLARITY Act, that capital is going to move. The difference, as Moreno and industry advocates keep stressing, is whether it moves under a U.S. legal framework that offers institutional guardrails and SEC‑CFTC clarity — or whether Washington runs out the clock and watches its last real shot at shaping the next decade of crypto market structure vanish with the May recess gavel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

BitGo Outlines Four Controls as AI Agents Move Into Institutional Finance

Published

on

Revolut Builds $200 Billion IPO Case on Record Profits

Agentic finance is gaining serious traction. AI agents are no longer just drafting reports or surfacing ideas. They are placing trades, settling payments, and transacting on behalf of users and enterprises. The pace has accelerated sharply in 2026.

As adoption scales, Jody Mettler, COO of BitGo, says that from an institutional standpoint, four controls must be in place for agentic transactions.

Agentic Finance Arrives From Every Direction

Recent weeks have seen a wave of agentic AI launches pushing autonomous systems closer to live financial activity. Most recently, Coinbase’s x402 launched Agentic.market.

It is a marketplace and discovery layer for the x402 agentic commerce ecosystem, letting humans browse services via a web UI and AI agents autonomously find and integrate them through an MCP interface, with semantic search, live metrics, and no accounts required.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Furthermore, enterprise software firm Aptean previewed AppCentral. This brings 10 AI agents to Microsoft Dynamics 365 customers across finance, supply chain, procurement, and production.

Basware has launched AI agents within its Invoice Lifecycle Management Platform, harnessing Agentic AI to transform invoice processing and bring fully autonomous accounts payable within reach.

Advertisement

“The future involves Agentic Finance, where AI entities transact on behalf of the enterprise to drive faster, smarter decisions and real business outcomes. This is the future we are creating at Basware and preparing our customers for today,” Basware’s CEO Jason Kurtz said.

Last month, Bybit rolled out the Bybit AI Trading Skill Hub, featuring 253 APIs. It delivers an all-in-one AI trading experience spanning market data, spot and derivatives trading, and account and asset management.

BitGo itself shipped the Model Context Protocol (“MCP”) server on March 23, giving AI development tools direct access to its documentation and APIs.

These launches collectively highlight a clear shift: agentic AI is moving from experimentation into real financial and commercial infrastructure, with autonomous agents now being positioned to transact, trade, and operate on behalf of businesses.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, a recent survey adds crucial demand-side evidence to the wave of agentic AI launches. NVIDIA’s sixth annual State of AI in Financial Services 2026 report, based on 800+ industry professionals, found that 65% of firms are actively using AI (up from 45% a year earlier).

In addition, 42% are using or assessing agentic AI, and 21% have already deployed AI agents. 

“Agentic AI systems can now autonomously route transactions to the most optimized payment networks, dynamically adjust retry logic based on real-time issuer signals, and make routing decisions under 200-millisecond routing that traditional rule-based systems simply can’t match. What makes this compelling is that every basis point improvement in authorization rates translates directly to revenue — there’s no ambiguity in measurement,” Dwayne Gefferie, payments strategist at Gefferie Group, said.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

Key Pillars for Institutional Agentic Finance

In an interview with BeInCrypto, Mettler welcomed the innovation but drew a sharp line on risk. From an institutional standpoint, she argued, agentic transactions demand specific controls to avoid becoming a “wild west.”

Advertisement

“While we’re looking at this and we are absolutely excited about what the future can hold here… we don’t want a financial crisis to happen because it’s just the wild west. So, there needs to be controls around it,” she said.

The first is identity. Institutions need to know who or what stands behind each agent acting on their systems. The second is permissions. Every agent needs limits on what it can access, authorize, or execute.

The third is policy and approval logic. Rules must govern which actions run autonomously and which require human sign-off. The fourth is auditability. A traceable record of every agent decision lets institutions and regulators reconstruct what happened if something goes wrong.

“Everybody’s entering into this era with some measured optimism, right? We need to look into it with where it can take us from a financial infrastructure standpoint, but also about the controls that you still need to have behind it,” she added.

As agentic finance scales, these four controls are likely to become the benchmark against which new systems are evaluated.

The post BitGo Outlines Four Controls as AI Agents Move Into Institutional Finance appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Polymarket odds for Waller Fed chair confirmation surge on Powell probe U-turntitle%

Published

on

Polymarket odds for Waller Fed chair confirmation surge on Powell probe U-turntitle%

Polymarket catapulted Waller’s Fed chair odds from 27% to 85% after reports the DOJ will drop its criminal probe into Jerome Powell, clearing a key Senate roadblock.

Prediction markets have dramatically repriced the odds that Christopher Waller will become the next chair of the Federal Reserve after fresh signals that the Department of Justice will shut down its criminal case against Jerome Powell. On Polymarket, contracts tied to the outcome “Waller will be confirmed as Chairman of the Federal Reserve before May 15” have jumped from around 27% to roughly 85% in short order, a 211% relative increase that reflects traders’ belief that the main political roadblock is about to vanish.

Advertisement

While the specific Waller market is separate from Polymarket’s higher‑volume “Who will be confirmed as Fed Chair?” and “Kevin Warsh confirmed as Fed Chair by…?” contracts, the underlying dynamic is the same: odds are reacting to developments in the Powell investigation and the Senate Banking Committee’s posture. In the broader Fed chair contract, Kevin Warsh still leads with about a 94% implied probability over other contenders such as Judy Shelton and Michelle Bowman, but short‑dated timing markets have become far more sensitive to any news about Powell’s legal overhang.

According to a detailed chronology compiled on Wikipedia, federal prosecutors opened a criminal inquiry into Powell early this year related to alleged cost overruns on renovations of two historic Fed buildings, prompting an unusually public clash between the central bank and the Trump administration. As of April, Powell has not been charged with any crime, and the Department of Justice formally dropped the investigation on April 24, clearing a key condition that Senator Thom Tillis (R‑N.C.) had tied to his support for any successor.

Tillis, a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, had repeatedly warned that he would use his position to block Trump’s nominees from getting a committee vote so long as the DOJ probe remained open. Local outlets such as KATV and KOMO News reported this week that Tillis “will continue to block President Trump’s nominee until the Justice Department ends its probe of current Chair Powell,” effectively making the DOJ’s decision a gating item for any confirmation timeline.

With that obstacle now expected to fall away, traders are marking up the probability that the Senate can move quickly enough to confirm Waller before Powell’s term officially ends on May 15. Polymarket’s live odds page notes that its Fed chair timing contracts resolve to “yes” if the nominee secures Senate confirmation by the deadline, and “no” if the nomination is withdrawn or rejected — a structure that helps explain why even small shifts in the DOJ’s stance can produce outsized swings in short‑term probabilities.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025