Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Crypto regulation: Coinbase rejects CLARITY Act

Published

on

Crypto regulation: Coinbase rejects CLARITY Act

The crypto regulation standoff between Coinbase and the US Senate intensified this month when the exchange formally told Senate offices it cannot support the latest CLARITY Act draft, marking its second withdrawal from legislation that could define US digital asset law for a generation.

Summary

  • Coinbase told Senate Banking Committee offices it has significant concerns about the Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise draft, which bans passive yield on stablecoin balances and restricts access to transaction size data used to calculate rewards, changes that attack the infrastructure Coinbase uses to generate stablecoin revenue rather than just limiting a single product feature
  • Coinbase reported $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025, largely tied to its USDC distribution agreement with Circle; provisions eliminating stablecoin yield could strip the exchange of an estimated $800 million in annual revenue, making this a core financial question rather than a policy objection
  • CEO Brian Armstrong first pulled support in January, stating “we’d rather have no bill than a bad bill”; the second formal withdrawal, reported by Punchbowl News around March 25, followed a revised draft that tightened yield language further rather than loosening it

As TheStreet reported, Coinbase representatives told Senate offices the exchange could not yet support the latest version, citing significant concerns about the stablecoin yield language. Armstrong confirmed talks are ongoing. The Tillis-Alsobrooks draft goes beyond the base bill’s existing yield limitations by also restricting exchange access to transaction size data, which is the calculation layer that makes volume-based or activity-based stablecoin rewards technically feasible. For Coinbase, that second provision is the more alarming one because it removes not just a product feature but the technical infrastructure needed to generate yield at all.

Advertisement

Stablecoin revenue represents close to 20 percent of Coinbase’s total 2025 revenue. Under its USDC agreement with Circle, Coinbase receives most of the interest income on USDC held on its platform. Any restriction eliminating the structural capacity to calculate or distribute yield attacks that revenue line directly. Every round of negotiation since January has narrowed the yield carve-outs, not expanded them. Coinbase’s leverage is real: a markup without its endorsement signals to senators on both sides that industry consensus has fractured, and the bill needs bipartisan votes it cannot afford to lose.

The Industry Split and What It Means

Coinbase is not the whole industry. Andreessen Horowitz and other major investors have publicly supported the CLARITY Act even in its current form, arguing that the institutional legitimacy the bill provides outweighs stablecoin revenue concessions. An industry call in late March reportedly featured sharp disagreements over how to proceed. As crypto.news has reported, the CLARITY Act faces four factions each with effective veto power, and Coinbase’s withheld support does not automatically kill the bill but significantly complicates the vote count.

What the May Deadline Means for Both Sides

As crypto.news has noted, the GENIUS Act’s stablecoin framework advances through financial regulators regardless of CLARITY’s fate. What CLARITY provides, including SEC and CFTC jurisdictional clarity, DeFi oversight rules, and tokenized equity frameworks, has no alternative legislative path. Senator Bernie Moreno has warned that missing May risks losing the bill to midterm season entirely. The Senate Banking Committee markup target remains late April, and Coinbase’s continued refusal to endorse the draft is the single largest obstacle between that target and an actual vote.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bittensor’s TAO Leads Crypto Losers After Key Subnet Operator Departs

Published

on

The crypto market rose by over 1.4% over the past day. However, Bittensor (TAO) missed the market-wide recovery.

The token dropped over 9% over the past 24 hours. The decline made TAO the worst-performing top-100 cryptocurrency by market cap. At press time, it traded at $292.

Bittensor (TAO) Price Performance
Bittensor (TAO) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto Markets

The selloff followed Covenant AI’s announcement that it is leaving the Bittensor network. The team operated three subnets, Templar (SN3), Basilica (SN39), and Grail (SN81), making it one of the protocol’s most prominent contributors.

Sam Dare, the founder of Covenant AI, cited concerns about decentralization as the reason for the departure. In a public statement, Dare accused Bittensor co-founder Jacob Steeves of exercising centralized control over what is marketed as a decentralized network.

Specifically, Covenant AI alleges that Steeves suspended emissions to its subnets, stripped its moderation access over its own community channels, unilaterally deprecated its subnet infrastructure, and applied economic pressure through strategically timed token sales.

Advertisement

“We cannot in good conscience continue to build on a network where the foundational claim we make to our investors, that this infrastructure is decentralized and permissionless, is contradicted by the reality of how the network is actually governed,” Dare wrote. “Bittensor operates a triumvirate structure, three individuals who manage the multisig for network upgrades, presented to the community as distributed governance. It is not. It is decentralization theatre.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The exit marks a dramatic shift in sentiment. Covenant AI’s Covenant-72B model was previously a key trigger for a significant TAO rally. The altcoin appreciated after NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang referenced the model during an appearance on the All-In Podcast.

Despite leaving Bittensor, Covenant AI said it will retain its research team, existing work, and the models. The company indicated that new project announcements are expected soon.

Advertisement

“Covenant AI’s mission has not changed. Decentralized, permissionless AI training is not a Bittensor feature. It is a technological capability that our team is eager to advance,” the post added.

Whether the departure triggers further governance debate within the Bittensor community remains to be seen in the days ahead.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Bittensor’s TAO Leads Crypto Losers After Key Subnet Operator Departs appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

xAI sues Colorado to block AI law targeting chatbot speech

Published

on

Latest AI news: China's MizarVision aids Iran

Elon Musk’s xAI is taking Colorado to court over a new set of regulations designed to govern artificial intelligence.

Summary

  • xAI has filed a lawsuit against Colorado to block Senate Bill 24-205 which would mandate rules against discrimination in AI systems used for jobs and housing.
  • The company argues that the state is attempting to force its own political views onto the Grok chatbot and is interfering with its goal to be a truth-seeking platform.

The lawsuit, filed in a US district court on Thursday, seeks to stop Senate Bill 24-205 from taking effect. This law was created to prevent “algorithmic discrimination” by AI in sensitive sectors such as housing, finance, and employment.

The legal challenge centers on the idea that the state is overstepping its bounds by influencing how AI models communicate. 

Advertisement

In the court filing, xAI claimed that “Colorado cannot alter xAI’s message simply because it wants to amplify its own views on the highly politicized subjects of fairness and equity.” The company also noted that the mandate would hinder its mission for Grok to be “maximally truth seeking.”

Legal representatives for xAI pointed out what they see as a contradiction in the bill, which is scheduled to start on June 30. They argued that the law actually encourages “differential treatment” under the guise of trying to “increase diversity or redress historical discrimination.”

Last December, xAI sued California over the Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act. In that case, the company argued that being forced to disclose data sources violates the First and Fifth Amendments by revealing trade secrets and compelling specific types of speech. 

Advertisement

Amidst these state-level fights, some federal officials are calling for a change in how the industry is managed. 

David Sacks, the White House AI czar and co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, has been vocal about the need for a national standard.

“The problem that we’re seeing right now is that you’ve got 50 different states regulating this in 50 different ways, and it’s creating a patchwork of regulation that’s difficult for innovators to comply with,” Sacks stated in late March.

President Donald Trump appointed Sacks as co-chair of the newly established President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to help streamline these rules and prevent a fragmented legal landscape across the country.

Advertisement

Trump recently signed an executive order aimed at centralizing these policies, with the goal of “nationalizing AI policy in place of the current patchwork of state laws.” 

The administration has signaled that state-level mandates requiring AI to alter its output could be viewed as an obstruction to national interests and American leadership in the sector.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Why is Bitcoin price stuck today?

Published

on

CME Bitcoin futures open with second-largest gap on record

Bitcoin’s push past $73,000 quickly lost steam as the market shifted focus back to a shaky truce between the U.S. and Iran.

Summary

  • Bitcoin failed to hold above $73,000 as Iran tensions and weak US data weighed on sentiment.
  • Oil near $97 and a 0.4% rise in core PCE added pressure on risk assets.

While a brief rally took place after rumors surfaced that Iran might accept Bitcoin as payment for cargo ships moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the excitement faded. Investors are now worried that geopolitical friction could undo the progress Bitcoin has made in the U.S. market recently.

Tensions flared when Iranian parliamentary speaker and former IRGC general Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf criticized the ongoing military actions in Lebanon. 

Advertisement

Ghalibaf, a key figure in the regime, warned that any “illegal entry” or “denial of uranium enrichment” would be seen as a move to “violate the ceasefire” and could trigger a larger conflict.

This instability pushed crude oil prices back up to $97 per barrel. Rising energy costs typically pull money away from speculative assets like crypto as investors become more cautious about risk. 

However, the pressure isn’t just coming from overseas; data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis showed that the core PCE index rose by 0.4% on Thursday. This suggests that inflation is stickier than expected, making it harder for the Federal Reserve to pivot.

Advertisement

Economic growth is also slowing down significantly. The fourth quarter GDP was revised down to a tiny 0.5% annualized rate, signaling that the economy is almost at a standstill. 

Usually, signs of stagnation lead traders to expect the government to step in with more liquidity, but this time, the data has sparked genuine fear. A lack of faith in the plan to avoid a recession has already softened the U.S. dollar against a basket of other major currencies.

Will Bitcoin price go up?

Currently, Bitcoin is stuck in an awkward spot between these two narratives. It is trying to find a clear path while being pulled by war headlines on one side and a possible economic crash on the other. This lack of direction is visible on the charts, as the price struggles to stay above $72,000.

For the rally to continue, Bitcoin needs to chew through a massive wall of selling pressure. There are roughly $6 billion in leveraged short positions sitting between $72,200 and $73,500. Even though yesterday’s rally cleared $427 million in these bets, the remaining sell orders are acting as a heavy lid on the price.

Advertisement

Bitcoin needs to firmly break $73,000 and turn that level into support before it can chase new highs. If it fails to clear this liquidity soon, traders may lose heart and start taking profits, which could easily send the price sliding back toward $68,000.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

90% of New CEX Token Listings Fall Below Debut Price Within a Year, Report Finds

Published

on

A new CoinGecko report found that roughly 90% of newly listed altcoins on top centralized exchanges fall below their listing price within 12 months.

The findings paint a grim picture for retail buyers chasing new token listings across the industry’s biggest trading platforms.

Most New Altcoin Listings Lose Value Fast

According to the report, only about 32% of new altcoin listings record positive price action immediately after going live across the top 12 centralized exchanges (CEXs). That means nearly two out of three tokens start losing value from the moment they begin trading.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Advertisement
Altcoin Performance Post Listing
Altcoin Performance Post Listing. Source: CoinGecko

Exchange-level data reveals sharp differences in early performance. Upbit stood out with 67% of its listings showing gains 30 days after debut, though CoinGecko noted that the South Korean exchange has one of the lowest listing rates. Binance followed at 50%, while Kraken and Gate trailed at just 14%.

However, those early gains faded quickly. By days 30 to 59, only 25% of tokens remained in positive territory on average.

“Across longer time frames, this percentage declines somewhat linearly across all exchanges. The only exception is Coinbase, whose listed coins catch a second wind after the half-year mark of being listed on the exchange,” the report read.

Even Upbit’s Winners Eventually Lose

Upbit’s trajectory tells the most striking story. Despite starting with the strongest 30-day performance, every one of its newly listed altcoins fell below its debut price by the 300- to 329-day mark.

That 67% to 0% collapse suggests early gains were driven by hype and limited supply rather than sustainable demand. By the 12-month mark, fewer than 10% of listed tokens on most top exchanges remained above their listing price.

Ultimately, the data reveals a consistent pattern: hype-driven rallies around new listings rarely translate into lasting value. While some tokens see short-term gains, the vast majority struggle to sustain momentum beyond the initial trading window.

Advertisement

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post 90% of New CEX Token Listings Fall Below Debut Price Within a Year, Report Finds appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Musk’s xAI Sues Colorado over AI Law

Published

on

Musk’s xAI Sues Colorado over AI Law

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI, has filed a lawsuit against the state of Colorado, seeking to block incoming AI rules that restrict speech from AI chatbots like Grok.

The AI company is specifically challenging Colorado’s Senate Bill 24-205, which aims to protect AI users from “algorithmic discrimination” in areas like employment, housing and finance. 

However, in a filing to a US district court in Colorado on Thursday, xAI argued that “Colorado cannot alter xAI’s message simply because it wants to amplify its own views on the highly politicized subjects of fairness and equity.”

The company further argued that the law, set to take effect on June 30, is contradictory as it promotes “differential treatment” in an effort to “increase diversity or redress historical discrimination.”

Advertisement

Forcing xAI to change Grok would also interfere with its goal of being “maximally truth seeking,” it said.

Source: David Sacks

Colorado isn’t the first state that xAI has sued over AI regulations. In December, it sued California over its Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act, arguing that disclosure requirements compel speech and reveal trade secrets in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments.

Related: AI agents overwhelmingly prefer Bitcoin over fiat in new study

The Colorado and California AI laws come after accusations of Grok making racist, sexist and antisemitic comments in the past.

AI rules should be left to federal regulators: David Sacks

White House AI czar David Sacks has led a push for state regulators to steer clear of crafting AI rules, arguing for a single federal standard for AI instead of a “patchwork” of state laws.

Advertisement

“The problem that we’re seeing right now is that you’ve got 50 different states regulating this in 50 different ways, and it’s creating a patchwork of regulation that’s difficult for innovators to comply with,” Sacks said in late March.

Sacks was appointed as co-chair of the newly established President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to address that issue.

Magazine: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket — AI Eye