Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Crypto stakes rise as 3 US states kick off primaries

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Voters in North Carolina, Texas and Arkansas head to the polls as the 2026 midterm cycle begins to take shape, with crypto policy emerging as a cross-cutting issue in several congressional contests. In Texas, Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett is pursuing a risky bid for the Senate seat held by Republican John Cornyn. Crockett’s campaign intersects with a broader narrative about funding from crypto-aligned groups and industry money aimed at shaping regulatory outcomes. The primary season features debates over stablecoin payments, market structure bills, and the balance between innovation and consumer protections. As crypto-focused political action committees mobilize substantial fundraising and media campaigns, the question for voters is whether these interests will tilt policy in Washington in the run-up to the 2026 midterms.

Key takeaways

  • Texas’s Senate primary has drawn substantial crypto-connected spending, with AdImpact reporting more than $122 million in total on both sides as of February 27.
  • Representative Jasmine Crockett’s voting history includes support for the GENIUS Act stabilizing payments and for FIT21, the former iteration of a digital asset market structure bill, while she opposed the CLARITY Act.
  • Crypto-focused PACs, including Fairshake and Web3 Forward, have deployed large sums in past cycles—Fairshake alone reported hundreds of millions in activity to influence media coverage and candidate support.
  • Advocacy groups and crypto donors have claimed that the 2024 cycle produced a notably pro-crypto Congress, a claim tied to subsequent legislative momentum on GENIUS Act provisions and related market frameworks.
  • The 2026 landscape features a wide slate of contests—33 Senate seats and all 435 House seats are up for grabs—making crypto-aligned fundraising a more persistent factor in down-ballot races beyond Texas.

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The intersection of political fundraising and crypto policy is increasingly prominent as lawmakers weigh stablecoin regulation, asset definitions, and market infrastructure bills amid broader macro and regulatory uncertainties.

Why it matters

The Texas race encapsulates a broader trend wherein crypto donors and advocacy groups are actively seeking to shape who sits in Congress and, by extension, the policy environment around digital assets. Crockett’s prior support for GENIUS Act-related provisions signals a willingness to engage with federal efforts aimed at simplifying or clarifying how stablecoins and other digital assets operate within traditional financial rules. Her voting history, including positions on FIT21 and CLARITY Act, provides a hinge point for how a Democratic candidate might approach a closely watched policy corridor as 2026 unfolds. The infusion of crypto money into the race—via committees backed by the industry and independent groups—highlights a persistent strategy: use media influence and targeted messaging to press for favorable regulatory outcomes, even as some campaigns insist they accept no corporate PAC money.

The broader backdrop is equally instructive. The rise of crypto-aligned PACs like Fairshake and its affiliates has underscored how fundraising can translate into policy visibility, particularly when a field is navigating complex questions about whether crypto should be treated as a security, a commodity, or a new category altogether. In the 2024 cycle, Fairshake and allied groups reported significant media spending to bolster pro-crypto candidates, a pattern described by industry advocates as contributing to what some labeled the “most pro-crypto Congress” in history. That sentiment fed into legislative activity around the GENIUS Act and related market structure initiatives, signaling that money and policy are increasingly entwined in the crypto policy conversation. For readers watching the Texas contest or statewide dynamics, this confluence matters because it can alter committee priorities, regulatory tempo, and the speed with which new laws or amendments are considered.

Advertisement

The narrative is reinforced by ongoing disclosures and public statements from PACs and industry figures. A January interview with Crockett, coupled with media investments from crypto-aligned groups, illustrates how candidates navigate a crowded field of political support while maintaining positions on core issues. The scene is further complicated by the involvement of well-known industry players and donors, including those linked to high-profile campaigns and political action committees that have historically funneled significant sums into pivotal races. This environment implies a higher degree of scrutiny on any candidate’s external funding sources and on how policy platforms align with those financial backers.

In parallel, the political rhythm around crypto policy remains dynamic. The original GENIUS Act line, the FIT21 framework, and the CLARITY Act have all featured in debates over how federal regulation should intersect with digital assets and stablecoins. The evolving narrative around those bills—along with public endorsements and criticisms from industry players—shapes not only candidate strategies but also the posture of regulators and the timing of potential policy updates. It is not just about one seat or one state; the 2026 cycle is shaping expectations for how Congress will respond to rapid changes in the crypto landscape and how those responses might affect market access, compliance costs, and innovation pipelines across a wide cross-section of the U.S. economy.

The discussion is further enriched by frequent references to related developments, including high-profile mentions such as the BitMEX co-founder pledge and other industry-linked contributions that have fed into broader debates about governance, accountability, and the role of money in politics. The evolving policy conversation—spurred by committee hearings, executive leadership changes, and continuing advocacy—may determine how quickly the U.S. moves from broader principles to concrete regulatory action. This is the kind of environment where a few primary races can become bellwethers for the future balance of power on crypto policy and, by extension, the direction of the sector in the years ahead.

To get a sense of the media and political dynamics at play, viewers can reference a related discussion that ties crypto fundraising to policy outcomes, including coverage of PAC activity and industry perspectives. The material includes a YouTube discussion and related reporting on how donor networks influence campaign messaging and policy debates. The ongoing conversation underscores that the 2026 cycle is as much about narrative control and fundraising strategy as it is about concrete policy proposals.

Advertisement

As the primary season continues, observers will also watch for additional data points on how crypto donors organize around specific candidates and districts. The narrative around Alabama, Texas, and other key states—where crypto-linked committees have already signaled intent to engage—offers a window into the mechanics of political influence in the digital-asset space. In the months ahead, campaigns and policymakers alike will need to address a complex matrix of questions: How will stablecoins be regulated? Will Congress advance a comprehensive market-structure framework? And how will donors calibrate their support in a way that aligns with voters’ broader economic priorities?

The broader context includes conventional political dynamics, such as party competition and voter sentiment, but the crypto dimension adds a distinct layer of financial leverage to the electoral process. The 2026 midterms will test whether the crypto-policy impulse can translate into durable legislative changes or if it remains a financing and messaging force within a noisy, highly scrutinized political environment. For readers tracking policy evolution, the coming weeks and months will be a critical period to observe where the money flows, which ideas gain traction, and how candidates like Crockett position themselves on one of the most volatile segments of the policy spectrum.

What to watch next

  • Follow the Texas primary results for Crockett, Cornyn, Paxton and other contenders as crypto donors weigh their preferred outcomes.
  • Monitor committee actions and floor votes related to the GENIUS Act, FIT21/FIT era bills, and the evolving market structure framework.
  • Track forthcoming disclosures from crypto PACs and their media allocations ahead of key primaries and the broader 2026 cycle.
  • Observe statements and ratings from Stand With Crypto and similar groups about candidates’ crypto stances, particularly in Texas and Alabama.

Sources & verification

  • AdImpact data showing more than $122 million in spending on the Texas Senate primary as of February 27.
  • Crockett’s voting history on GENIUS Act, FIT21, and CLARITY Act-related measures.
  • Reports on Fairshake and related PACs’ 2024 media spend and $193 million treasury ahead of the midterms.
  • Public statements and coverage related to the “most pro-crypto Congress” narrative and its connection to GENIUS Act progress.
  • Affiliates and ratings from crypto advocacy groups, including Stand With Crypto’s positions on specific lawmakers.

Election finance and crypto policy momentum in 2026

The Texas Senate race illustrates how campaign finance dynamics and policy ambitions converge in a high-stakes political environment. Crockett’s engagement with GENIUS Act-style provisions signals a willingness to engage with federal policy that could influence not only how stablecoins are treated but how the broader digital-asset market is defined and regulated. Her opponents’ positions, the industry’s fundraising playbook, and the broader narrative around what constitutes a pro-crypto Congress all feed into a broader pattern: money, messaging, and policy formulation are increasingly entangled as crypto assets move from niche technology to a mainstream political issue.

In the weeks ahead, the story will pivot on concrete legislative steps—whether committees will advance a cohesive framework for digital assets, where new regulatory guardrails may form, and how voters assess candidates’ ties to crypto money alongside traditional policy platforms. The 2026 midterms are not just about party lines; they are about how much weight the crypto policy perspective carries in determining the balance of power in Congress and, ultimately, the shape of regulation that could influence the technology’s adoption and the market’s competitive landscape.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

CFTC Launches Innovation Task Force Covering Crypto, AI, and Prediction Markets

Published

on

CFTC Launches Innovation Task Force Covering Crypto, AI, and Prediction Markets

The new unit will coordinate policy development and work alongside the SEC’s Crypto Task Force.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Tuesday announced the formation of an Innovation Task Force aimed at developing clearer regulatory frameworks for crypto assets, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets within U.S. derivatives markets.

“By establishing a clear regulatory framework for innovators building on the new frontier of finance, we can foster responsible innovation at home and ensure American market participants are not left on the sidelines,” Chairman Michael Selig said in a statement.

The unit will operate alongside the CFTC’s Innovation Advisory Committee, which was formed in February and includes more than 30 executives, including Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour and Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman.

Advertisement

According to the agency, the task force will concentrate on crypto assets and blockchain technology, artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, and prediction markets and event contracts.

The task force will also coordinate with other federal bodies, most notably the SEC and its Crypto Task Force, as both agencies continue to align their regulatory postures.

Interagency Alignment

The announcement extends a run of coordinated action between the two regulators. Earlier this month, the SEC and CFTC signed a memorandum of understanding formalizing their commitment to jointly oversee the digital asset sector.

That MOU followed the SEC’s March 17 interpretive release — arguably its most consequential crypto guidance to date — which classified 16 major tokens, including BTC, ETH, and SOL, as digital commodities that fall outside the SEC’s jurisdiction and are under the purview of the CFTC. The CFTC said it would administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistently with that framework.

Advertisement

Selig had telegraphed much of this agenda at the Milken Institute on March 3, where he said the CFTC was “modernizing” its rules to accommodate DeFi protocols and on-chain market infrastructure.

Prediction Markets in Focus

The inclusion of prediction markets as a core pillar of the task force underscores the CFTC’s intensifying push to assert federal jurisdiction over the rapidly growing sector. The agency launched a sweeping review of prediction markets on March 12 via an advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

Selig has also taken a combative stance against state gaming regulators that have challenged prediction market platforms, filing a friend-of-the-court brief in February in support of Crypto.com against the Nevada Gaming Control Board and warning that the CFTC “will no longer sit idly by” while states undermine its exclusive jurisdiction.

The momentum has coincided with major commercial developments in the space. Last week, Major League Baseball named Polymarket its exclusive prediction market partner and signed its own information-sharing MOU with the CFTC — a first for a professional sports league and the derivatives regulator.

Advertisement

The task force also arrives days after the CFTC granted no-action relief to Phantom, allowing the self-custodial Solana wallet to connect users to derivatives trading through registered market participants without having to register as a broker.

This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Spain arrests Ledger cofounder kidnapping suspect; crypto risk up

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Spanish authorities have taken a significant step in a high-profile, crypto-linked abduction case by detaining a suspect in Benalmádena, Málaga province, under a European arrest warrant issued by France. The man is accused of involvement in the kidnapping and torture of Ledger co-founder David Balland, with attackers demanding a 10 million euro ransom.

Balland was abducted from his home in central France on January 21, 2025, and held in captivity until a police operation freed him on the night of January 22. The case has since evolved into a cross-border pursuit, drawing in French and Spanish investigators as they unravel a network tied to the crime. French authorities had previously identified and arrested other members of the group, with the remaining suspect believed to have fled to Spain to evade capture, according to Spain’s Civil Guard.

The Civil Guard’s statement underscored the scale and risk of the operation, noting the suspect’s dangerousness and the potential for the criminal organization to attempt a violent rescue. The suspect was located in Benalmádena after authorities traced movements across several Spanish provinces, a thread that points to a coordinated, pan-European effort to dismantle the group behind Balland’s capture.

The arrest marks a notable juncture in a case that has drawn attention for its intersection with the broader crypto-security landscape in Europe. It also reflects an ongoing pattern of cross-border policing cooperation aimed at disrupting communities that leverage crypto networks for illicit activities. Balland’s kidnapping, and the ransom demand, amplifies concerns around the safety of prominent figures in the crypto space and the vigilance required by startups and investors alike. Cointelegraph previously reported on Balland’s abduction and release in January 2025.

Advertisement

Key takeaways

  • The suspect was detained in Benalmádena, Spain, under a European arrest warrant issued by France, linked to the Balland kidnapping case.
  • David Balland, Ledger co-founder, was abducted from central France on January 21, 2025, and released by police on January 22, with a ransom demand of 10 million euros.
  • Investigators traced the suspect’s movements across Valencia, Seville, and Cádiz before the arrest, including use of rental apartments and a third-party bank card to avoid detection.
  • The arrest comes amid a broader wave of crypto-linked crime in France during 2025, including a June arrest campaign involving 25 suspects in crypto-related kidnappings and other related incidents.
  • The case illustrates the growing security risks facing crypto figures and the value of cross-border cooperation in pursuing organized criminal networks tied to the crypto ecosystem.

Cross-border pursuit: from France to Spain

Authorities described a long-running, transnational chase that culminated in the suspect’s detention in the Andalusian town of Benalmádena. The operation required substantial resources due to the suspect’s perceived danger and the risk of intervention by associates who might attempt to free him. The investigation traced the individual through the Valencia region, where he lived with a partner and a friend, and noted that the group had minimized their footprint by renting apartments via online platforms and using a third party’s bank card to obscure financial links.

French investigators had already identified several other members of Balland’s attackers and pursued leads across borders. The French side has emphasized that the remaining suspect initially fled to Spain in an attempt to dodge capture, highlighting the challenges inherent in coordinating legal processes across jurisdictions in time-sensitive, violent-crime scenarios.

Crypto-linked crime in France: a mounting challenge

The Balland case sits within a broader pattern of crypto-linked criminal activity that tightened its grip on Europe’s crypto scene in 2025. In June, French authorities charged 25 suspects in a spree of kidnappings and attempted abductions targeting crypto executives and investors, according to reporting on the period. In another incident, a crypto user was abducted and held for hours in France, with attackers seeking cash and access to a hardware wallet containing a sum of funds. Earlier in the year, the daughter and grandson of Pierre Noizat, former CEO of Paymium, were targeted in an attempted abduction; the victims resisted and escaped. These events collectively elevated concerns about personal safety for crypto figures and the security of crypto-linked assets in real-world spaces.

As authorities pursue these investigations, industry observers are watching for how such criminal activity might influence security practices, governance standards at crypto companies, and the broader risk management landscape faced by the sector. For investors and builders alike, the trend underscores the necessity of robust physical and cyber risk controls, as well as ongoing collaboration with law enforcement to protect personnel and assets involved in the crypto economy. Cointelegraph has covered these developments as part of a wider conversation about security threats in the crypto space.

Implications for the ecosystem and what to watch next

The Benalmádena arrest reinforces the reality that crypto-linked crime extends beyond digital schemes into violent, real-world actions, and it tests the interoperability of European legal frameworks in urgent, cross-border contexts. Stakeholders should monitor how this case informs anti-kidnapping and asset-seizure protocols, as well as the sharing of intelligence between French and Spanish authorities and their counterparts across the EU. The ongoing investigation could yield new details about the operational methods of the criminal network, including how they leveraged crypto-related assets and platforms to finance or conceal their activities.

Advertisement

For the crypto industry, the episode is a reminder of the non-technical risks that surround high-profile figures and firms. As jurisdictions tighten oversight and enforcement actions expand, companies may increasingly emphasize contingency planning, staff security training, and clear incident response playbooks. Observers will also be watching for any further cross-border action tied to Balland’s case and related crypto-crime activity, and for how authorities weigh sanctions, asset tracing, and criminal network disruption in future prosecutions. Earlier coverage by Cointelegraph noted Balland’s abduction and subsequent release, and industry coverage continues to analyze how these developments intersect with regulatory and security dynamics across Europe.

Readers should stay attentive to updates from French and Spanish authorities as the investigation unfolds, and to how prosecutors frame charges or reveal new connections within the broader network involved in crypto-linked violence.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CESR becomes core benchmark as institutions seek yield in crypto

Published

on

Crypto-linked flows to trafficking services surge 85% in 2025, Chainalysis says

CESR, the Composite Ether Staking Rate, is emerging as Ethereum’s reference rate, underpinning swaps, futures and risk models as institutions chase transparent on‑chain yield.

The Composite Ether Staking Rate, or CESR, is rapidly becoming Ethereum’s reference rate, giving institutions a transparent benchmark for staking yields that can underpin loans, swaps and structured products across the crypto market. CoinDesk Indices and CoinFund describe CESR as “a global floating rate benchmark derived from the daily transaction fees and staking rewards emitted from the Ethereum Proof of Stake blockchain,” designed to serve as a neutral yardstick for on-chain income.

CESR sets a staking yield benchmark for Ethereum

The index captures all relevant block rewards paid to validators, including new ETH issuance, transaction fees and maximal extractable value, while also accounting for withdrawals and slashing, and is calculated and published daily, seven days a week.

Advertisement

Chris Perkins, president of CoinFund, called CESR “a defining institutional reference rate for the crypto asset class,” arguing that it can “spur investment product growth and new opportunities for risk management across global finance.” Alan Campbell, president of CoinDesk Indices, said the benchmark is “a foundational piece of infrastructure to crypto-asset markets,” noting that it builds on the firm’s experience running some of the longest-standing digital asset indices. Both executives frame CESR as crypto’s answer to classic interest-rate benchmarks, capable of becoming a new discount rate and allowing assets “across the digital domain to be priced as a relative investment to CESR.”

The benchmark is already being put to work. FalconX said it completed “the first fixed-floating interest rate swap on Ethereum staking yields using CESR,” using the index to hedge and trade the path of staking returns. Rho Labs has launched a liquid staking-rates market that references CESR, with the protocol’s first futures contracts allowing institutional counterparties to lock in fixed returns or speculate on future ETH staking yields. Rho founder Alex Ryvkin said CESR lets traders “manage risk from Ethereum staking yields and transaction costs more efficiently, and lock-in fixed rates of return,” adding that staking yields are “table stakes for serious ETH-based products and services.”

Treehouse Finance notes that CESR effectively captures the mean, annualized staking yield of Ethereum’s validator set, providing a standardized rate that can be slotted into risk models and pricing frameworks alongside traditional benchmarks. Lukka, a provider of institutional crypto data, has also partnered with CoinDesk Indices to distribute CESR to asset managers and analysts, emphasizing that the index incorporates deposits, withdrawals and penalties to deliver “a complete and reliable benchmark” for institutional use. As Perkins put it, “staking rates are to crypto what interest rates are to traditional financial markets,” and CESR is intended to unlock the “$500 trillion traditional rates markets across the crypto industry” by giving yield-focused investors a single, trusted reference point.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Lombard, Bitwise Partner to Unlock Bitcoin Yield Without Custody Transfer

Published

on

Telegram, Lending, DeFi, Institutions

Lombard, a company building Bitcoin-based lending infrastructure, will team with Bitwise Asset Management to enable institutions to earn yield and borrow against Bitcoin (BTC) without moving assets out of custody, aiming to unlock hundreds of billions of dollars in Bitcoin held in institutional custody.

The partnership was announced Tuesday at the Digital Asset Summit in New York. 

Jacob Phillips, CEO and co-founder of Lombard, told Cointelegraph: 

The breakthrough is Bitcoin Smart Accounts—connecting two previously isolated worlds: institutional custody and onchain finance.

According to an announcement shared with Cointelegraph, Bitwise will develop yield strategies combining DeFi lending with tokenized real-world assets, while Morpho, a decentralized lending protocol, will provide the lending infrastructure for borrowing against Bitcoin.

Advertisement

The platform uses Bitcoin-native tools such as partially signed transactions and timelocks to verify collateral, allowing positions to be represented onchain without transferring or rehypothecating the underlying assets.