Connect with us

Crypto World

Crypto Whales Are Waching 3 Tokens for Possible March Gains

Published

on

UNI Whales

With just days left in February, crypto whales are quietly repositioning. The broader market remains uncertain, but on-chain data tells a different story. Large holders are selectively adding exposure across three tokens — one seeking direction, one seeking a breakout, and one targeting greater upside.

As March approaches, the big holders appear to be making their move early.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Uniswap (UNI)

Uniswap is among the more interesting names showing crypto whale activity heading into March. Despite a broader market pullback, UNI is up nearly 15.5% over the past 24 hours, briefly spiking to $4.29 before pulling back sharply.

Yet crypto whales are not flinching. On-chain data shows large holders increased their UNI holdings from 639.06 million to 640 million tokens. And they did all of that on February 26 alone. At the current price, that sudden accumulation is worth roughly $1 million over a few hours, reflecting quiet conviction even as the price corrected from its intraday high.

Advertisement
UNI Whales
UNI Whales: Santiment

The chart context explains why. UNI has been consolidating inside a developing symmetrical triangle, with lower highs being met by higher lows as both trendlines converge. The past two attempts to break above the upper resistance were rejected hard, with sellers stepping in precisely at the triangle boundary. The large wick from today’s session is a direct reflection of that dynamic — momentum pushing up, supply pushing back.

However, smart money positioning remains aggressive, as the Smart Money Index is still way above the signal line. This keeps the possibility of a breakout alive if broader market conditions improve. A confirmed 12-hour close above $4.21 would validate the breakout and give UNI a possible bullish direction. That would open upside toward $4.88 and potentially $5.95 if DeFi rotation picks up meaningfully through March.

UNI Price Analysis
UNI Price Analysis: TradingView

On the downside, $3.81 is the key support. A break there risks pushing UNI toward the lower triangle boundary. However, buyers have consistently defended that zone since early February, suggesting the symmetrical structure remains intact and continues narrowing. However, if the broader market sell-off begins, traders need to keep a close eye on whale and smart money positioning.

Bitcoin Cash (BCH)

Bitcoin Cash is another name where whale accumulation has turned suddenly aggressive. BCH is up just 1.5% in the past 24 hours, underperforming the broader market. But zoom out, and Bitcoin Cash is up nearly 70% year-on-year. That is a standout number. Most major crypto names cannot say the same.

That long-term strength appears to be driving fresh conviction. The largest BCH holder cohort, wallets holding between 100,000 and 1,000,000 coins, increased their stash from 4.3 million to 4.4 million today, almost $50 million. The move was rapid and decisive. Notably, these whales were steadily reducing holdings until February 25. Then the shoulder of an inverse head-and-shoulders pattern formed.

BCH Whales
BCH Whales: Santiment

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Price began moving on February 24. By February 26, accumulation kicked in sharply. The timing is deliberate. Whales waited for the pattern to develop before committing. That is disciplined positioning, not reactive buying. On the 8-hour chart, BCH has rallied roughly 10% since February 24, only to pull back.

Advertisement

It is now approaching the neckline of that inverse head-and-shoulders formation. A confirmed break above $598 would signal a breach of the neckline, which BCH could attempt in March. Based on pattern projection, that opens a path toward $777. However, it would first need to push past $570, a strong technical resistance, before that.

Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis
Bitcoin Cash Price Analysis: TradingView

Given BCH’s year-on-year track record, both the targets, first the neckline at 19% and then the target, are not far-fetched. However, the setup has clear invalidation levels. Failure to reclaim $508 would be an early warning sign. A drop below $470 weakens the pattern meaningfully. A close under $423 invalidates the structure entirely, and the whale thesis unravels with it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Chainlink rounds out the three tokens where crypto whale accumulation has turned decisive heading into March. LINK saw continuous whale selling through February 25. That changed on February 26. Large holders increased their stash from 591.96 million to 592.33 million tokens. That is an addition of 370,000 LINK. At the current price, that accumulation is worth roughly $3.5 million — a sudden shift in positioning.

The trigger is clear. On the 12-hour chart, Chainlink broke out of an inverse head and shoulders pattern yesterday, as predicted by BeInCrypto Analysts. This is not anticipatory buying. Whales moved after the breakout was confirmed, adding on evidence rather than speculation.

LINK Whales
LINK Whales: Santiment

Since the breakout, LINK has met resistance at $9.62 and pulled back, possibly due to profit-taking. However, it is holding firmly near $9.28, a strong support zone. That level needs to hold for the bullish structure to remain intact.

There is another layer of strength here. The Chaikin Money Flow, or CMF, crossed above the zero line on February 20. That cross preceded the breakout, signaling institutional money flowing into LINK before the price moved. CMF currently sits at 0.13.

Advertisement
LINK Price Analysis
LINK Price Analysis: TradingView

A push toward 0.18 would confirm deepening institutional participation and give LINK the momentum needed for the next leg.
If buying resumes and sentiment holds, a move above $9.62 followed by $10.05 opens the path toward the realized projection target of $11.70.

Invalidation is straightforward. A correction toward $8.51 is the first warning. A close below $8.04 weakens the structure considerably and puts the entire bullish thesis at risk.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Circle paid $461 million in distribution costs from $733 million reserve income in Q4

Published

on

Circle paid $461 million in distribution costs from $733 million reserve income in Q4

Circle sent 63% of Q4 USDC reserve income to distributors, compressing margins.

Circle Internet Financial reported fourth quarter earnings showing the stablecoin issuer paid $460.6 million in distribution and transaction costs against $733.4 million in reserve income, representing approximately 63% of gross yield generated from customer deposits.

The company’s USDC stablecoin circulation reached $75.3 billion at year-end, up 72% year-over-year, according to the earnings report. Reserve income increased 69% while adjusted EBITDA grew fivefold compared to the prior year period.

Advertisement

Total revenue and reserve income reached $770.2 million for the quarter, with distribution costs accounting for nearly 60% of earnings, according to the financial statements. Circle retained $272.8 million in net reserve income after distribution payments.

The company publishes “Revenue Less Distribution Costs” as a core performance metric each quarter. Circle’s net reserve margin settled at 37% in the fourth quarter, meaning the issuer retained approximately $0.37 for every dollar of gross reserve yield.

Stablecoin issuers generate income by holding user deposits in reserve portfolios consisting primarily of short-term Treasury securities and similar instruments. Circle reported a 3.8% reserve return rate in the fourth quarter, down 68 basis points year-over-year. Average USDC in circulation doubled from $38.1 billion to $76.2 billion during the period.

Advertisement

Distribution costs rose 52% year-over-year, according to the earnings report. Circle attributed the increase to “increased distribution payments” to exchanges, wallets, and fintech platforms that provide user access. The prior-year period included a $60 million one-time fee to a distribution partner, previously disclosed.

Circle’s five-quarter trend data shows distributors consistently claimed approximately 63% of reserve income each quarter. Distribution payments are tied to placement agreements and transaction flows rather than fixed technology costs.

The company’s risk disclosures state it may be “unable to maintain existing relationships with financial institutions and similar firms or enter into new relationships.” Circle flags potential pressure to accept “less favorable financial terms” with distribution partners and highlights “dependence on a few key distributors” as a structural constraint.

Circle tracks a metric called “USDC on Platform,” measuring the share of total USDC held across partner platforms. That figure reached $12.5 billion at year-end, up 459% year-over-year, with a daily weighted average of 17.8% of total circulation, according to company data.

Advertisement

Treasury bill yields remained in the mid-3% range as of late February 2026. Market expectations contemplate potential Federal Reserve rate cuts in coming quarters, according to financial market data. A declining rate environment would compress reserve income while distribution costs may prove less flexible, potentially pressuring issuer margins.

Circle’s guidance reflects margin compression relative to the fourth quarter’s 40% RLDC margin, according to the company’s forward-looking statements. The guidance indicates distribution costs may not decline proportionally to reserve income in a lower-rate environment.

In most stablecoin implementations, users do not directly receive yield on their holdings. Issuers earn reserve income and negotiate distribution agreements with platforms that control user access. Distributors do not bear balance sheet risk associated with reserves.

The GENIUS Act, referenced in Circle’s regulatory disclosures, establishes a U.S. framework for payment stablecoins. The legislation formalizes regulatory requirements for stablecoin issuers.

Advertisement

Circle’s operational risk disclosures focus on distributor relationships rather than traditional liquidity concerns. The company states that major partners could change incentive structures, promote competing stablecoins, or develop proprietary infrastructure. Such shifts could reallocate transaction flows and distribution economics.

Circle’s reserves are liquid, audited, and managed conservatively, according to company disclosures. The balance sheet is structured to withstand redemption surges.

The company’s “USDC on Platform” metric monitors concentration of balances across distribution partners. Higher concentration on specific platforms affects negotiating leverage in distribution agreements.

Market dynamics in the stablecoin sector increasingly focus on securing and maintaining distribution relationships with platforms that control user access. Issuers compete for placement on exchanges, wallets, and payment rails that determine transaction flows.

Advertisement

Circle’s fourth quarter results showed the company generated $733.4 million in reserve income and allocated $460.6 million to distribution and transaction costs, leaving $272.8 million in net reserve income before operating expenses.

Circle Internet Financial reported fourth quarter earnings showing the stablecoin issuer paid $460.6 million in distribution and transaction costs against $733.4 million in reserve income, representing approximately 63% of gross yield generated from customer deposits.

The company’s USDC stablecoin circulation reached $75.3 billion at year-end, up 72% year-over-year, according to the earnings report. Reserve income increased 69% while adjusted EBITDA grew fivefold compared to the prior year period.

Total revenue and reserve income reached $770.2 million for the quarter, with distribution costs accounting for nearly 60% of earnings, according to the financial statements. Circle retained $272.8 million in net reserve income after distribution payments.

Advertisement

The company publishes “Revenue Less Distribution Costs” as a core performance metric each quarter. Circle’s net reserve margin settled at 37% in the fourth quarter, meaning the issuer retained approximately $0.37 for every dollar of gross reserve yield.

Stablecoin issuers generate income by holding user deposits in reserve portfolios consisting primarily of short-term Treasury securities and similar instruments. Circle reported a 3.8% reserve return rate in the fourth quarter, down 68 basis points year-over-year. Average USDC in circulation doubled from $38.1 billion to $76.2 billion during the period.

Distribution costs rose 52% year-over-year, according to the earnings report. Circle attributed the increase to “increased distribution payments” to exchanges, wallets, and fintech platforms that provide user access. The prior-year period included a $60 million one-time fee to a distribution partner, previously disclosed.

Circle’s five-quarter trend data shows distributors consistently claimed approximately 63% of reserve income each quarter. Distribution payments are tied to placement agreements and transaction flows rather than fixed technology costs.

Advertisement

The company’s risk disclosures state it may be “unable to maintain existing relationships with financial institutions and similar firms or enter into new relationships.” Circle flags potential pressure to accept “less favorable financial terms” with distribution partners and highlights “dependence on a few key distributors” as a structural constraint.

Circle tracks a metric called “USDC on Platform,” measuring the share of total USDC held across partner platforms. That figure reached $12.5 billion at year-end, up 459% year-over-year, with a daily weighted average of 17.8% of total circulation, according to company data.

Treasury bill yields remained in the mid-3% range as of late February 2026. Market expectations contemplate potential Federal Reserve rate cuts in coming quarters, according to financial market data. A declining rate environment would compress reserve income while distribution costs may prove less flexible, potentially pressuring issuer margins.

Circle’s guidance reflects margin compression relative to the fourth quarter’s 40% RLDC margin, according to the company’s forward-looking statements. The guidance indicates distribution costs may not decline proportionally to reserve income in a lower-rate environment.

Advertisement

In most stablecoin implementations, users do not directly receive yield on their holdings. Issuers earn reserve income and negotiate distribution agreements with platforms that control user access. Distributors do not bear balance sheet risk associated with reserves.

The GENIUS Act, referenced in Circle’s regulatory disclosures, establishes a U.S. framework for payment stablecoins. The legislation formalizes regulatory requirements for stablecoin issuers.

Circle’s operational risk disclosures focus on distributor relationships rather than traditional liquidity concerns. The company states that major partners could change incentive structures, promote competing stablecoins, or develop proprietary infrastructure. Such shifts could reallocate transaction flows and distribution economics.

Circle’s reserves are liquid, audited, and managed conservatively, according to company disclosures. The balance sheet is structured to withstand redemption surges.

Advertisement

The company’s “USDC on Platform” metric monitors concentration of balances across distribution partners. Higher concentration on specific platforms affects negotiating leverage in distribution agreements.

Market dynamics in the stablecoin sector increasingly focus on securing and maintaining distribution relationships with platforms that control user access. Issuers compete for placement on exchanges, wallets, and payment rails that determine transaction flows.

Circle’s fourth quarter results showed the company generated $733.4 million in reserve income and allocated $460.6 million to distribution and transaction costs, leaving $272.8 million in net reserve income before operating expenses.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin ETF Inflows Rise While Derivatives Markets Reflect Caution

Published

on

Bitcoin ETF Inflows Rise While Derivatives Markets Reflect Caution

Key takeaways:

  • Bitcoin derivatives show persistent fear despite the current rally toward $70,000, as seen by futures premiums being pinned well below neutral levels.

  • The markets’ cautious stance stems from broad risk-aversion and lingering concerns over institutional BTC liquidations and Bitcoin network security.

Bitcoin (BTC) retested the $70,000 level on Wednesday, recovering from Tuesday’s low of $62,500. While inflows into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) helped stabilize market sentiment, the momentum failed to restore confidence within the BTC derivatives markets. Traders remain concerned that underlying factors are preventing a sustained rally toward $75,000.

Bitcoin US-listed ETFs daily net flows, USD million. Source: Farside Investors

US-listed Bitcoin ETFs recorded $764 million in net inflows over two days, partially offsetting the $1.2 billion in outflows seen during the previous eight trading days. These large movements are typically attributed to institutional activity, suggesting strong demand when prices dip below $65,000. 

Despite this demand, the appetite for leveraged bullish positions in BTC futures has dropped sharply.

BTC 2-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The annualized premium for Bitcoin futures relative to spot markets sat at 2% on Thursday, remaining well below the 5% neutral threshold. Bullish momentum has been largely absent since Jan. 31, the date Bitcoin surrendered the $85,000 support level after holding it for over nine months. Data from the options market further indicates that professional traders are prioritizing the avoidance of downside exposure.

BTC 30-day options delta skew (put-call) at Deribit. Source: Laevitas.ch

Bitcoin put (sell) options traded at a 14% premium compared to equivalent call (buy) instruments on Thursday. In a neutral market environment, this indicator typically fluctuates between -6% and +6%, signaling that fear remains a dominant force. Although this skew metric has improved from the 28% “panic” levels recorded on Tuesday, the recovery to $70,000 has done little to shift the cautious outlook of derivatives traders.

Is a single entity behind Bitcoin’s price weakness?

Recently, a number of unproven theories have been proposed to explain Bitcoin’s 32% decline over seven weeks. This downward trend began following the Oct. 10, 2025, market crash, which eliminated $19 billion in leveraged positions across the cryptocurrency sector. This volatility coincided with US President Donald Trump announcing a 100% increase in import tariffs on Chinese goods.

Advertisement

Following that event, Binance reportedly provided $283 million in compensation to users affected by liquidations attributed to internal oracle pricing errors, system latency, and asset transfer degradation. Binance co-founder and former CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao has since refuted allegations that the exchange intentionally triggered the October 2025 crash.

Other market participants have linked the recent bearishness to concerns over quantum computing. These fears intensified after Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood removed Bitcoin from his “Greed & Fear” model portfolio in January, citing potential risks to long-term security. In response, developers drafted a proposal, BIP-360, which focuses on advancing post-quantum cryptography onchain.

Related: Coin Bureau CEO on Bitcoin in 2026–Cycles, Liquidity and a Divided Market

Source: X/_Checkmatey_

The most recent explanation for Bitcoin’s lackluster performance involves the quantitative trading firm Jane Street. These claims gained momentum after Terraform Labs’ court-appointed administrator sued the company, alleging insider trading related to transactions that accelerated the collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem in May 2022.

Jane Street’s recent 13-F filing disclosed significant holdings in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and various Bitcoin mining companies. However, Julio Moreno, head of research at CryptoQuant, noted that such activity is typical for delta-neutral strategies. 

Advertisement

Ultimately, the 5% decline in Nvidia (NVDA US) shares on Thursday following strong earnings suggests a growing risk-averse sentiment among investors, which may partially explain why Bitcoin struggles to reclaim the $75,000 level.