Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Curve Finance Claims PancakeSwap Copied Its Code

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The Curve Finance team has accused PancakeSwap of integrating its StableSwap code into the newer PancakeSwap Infinity release without a proper license. The dispute centers on the StableSwap module, which underpins swaps involving stablecoins and tightly pegged assets, and its deployment within Infinity, the latest iteration of the PancakeSwap decentralized exchange. Curve’s public note on X framed licensing as a prerequisite for any continued use of the code, inviting PancakeSwap to engage in formal licensing or collaboration to reduce legal risk and safeguard users. The exchange has signaled it may reach out to Curve to discuss the matter, with Curve replying that “better to be friends and build together.”

Beyond licensing, Curve stressed that deploying stable-swap capabilities safely requires deep specialized know-how. The post pointed to historically high-risk episodes tied to swap-based systems, underscoring that even seemingly straightforward integrations can become attack surfaces if not designed with rigorous safeguards. The reference points include Saddle Finance’s 2022 hack and the 2025 Balancer incident, which saw a $116 million exploit tied to swap-based code. These examples are invoked to warn users and developers about the potential for losses when complex liquidity mechanisms interact with permissionless platforms.

Cointelegraph contacted both Curve and PancakeSwap for comment, but neither side had responded by publication time. The absence of formal statements on licensing terms leaves a broader conversation about DeFi security, intellectual-property rights, and cross-chain interoperability still unresolved. The episode also highlights how fast-moving feature sets—such as cross-chain swaps and programmable liquidity—can collide with the practical and legal complexities of code reuse in open ecosystems.

The timing aligns with PancakeSwap’s ongoing ecosystem expansion. In April 2025, Infinity launched on Arbitrum and BNB Chain, introducing one-click cross-chain swaps intended to streamline asset movement across networks. The upgrade also introduced “hooks” — smart contract plug-ins that let liquidity providers tailor pool parameters, including dynamic fee structures, customized rebates, and on-chain limit orders that execute when predefined conditions are met. PancakeSwap said the upgrade reduced pool-creation fees by as much as 99%, signaling an attempt to accelerate liquidity onboarding and experimentation across chains.

Advertisement

Further growth followed later in 2025, with Infinity extending to Base, an Ethereum layer-2 network. PancakeSwap reported that trading on Base could be up to 50% cheaper when Ether (CRYPTO: ETH) trades against ERC-20 tokens, underscoring the economic incentives behind cross-chain expansions and the continued push to lower trading costs for users who bridge assets across networks. The Base deployment exemplifies how DeFi aggregators are increasingly pursuing multi-chain footprints to improve liquidity depth and user experience, even as they navigate new regulatory and security considerations. ERC-20 remains the dominant token standard on Ethereum-based assets, including many that flow through L2 ecosystems and cross-chain adapters.

Taken together, the episode illustrates a core tension in DeFi: rapid feature innovation and cross-chain interoperability versus the need for rigorous license compliance and robust security controls. As Infinity’s architecture becomes more sophisticated—incorporating hooks, dynamic fees, rebates, and conditional orders—the potential attack surface grows, even as the market appetite for seamless, multi-chain swaps intensifies. The fact that Curve explicitly linked licensing discussions with user safety signals that governance and IP considerations may increasingly influence how DeFi projects collaborate and compete in the coming years.

For readers tracking the evolution of cross-chain DeFi, the exchange between Curve and PancakeSwap is a useful case study in how open-source finance negotiates the line between rapid innovation and formal protection of codebases. It also raises practical questions for developers and users: how are licenses enforced in permissionless environments, what constitutes a legally safe deployment of shared code, and how quickly can open collaboration be formalized when risk signals emerge?

PancakeSwap Infinity launches and goes cross-chain

PancakeSwap Infinity debuted on Arbitrum and BNB Chain in April 2025, following the project’s earlier adoption of one-click cross-chain swaps to facilitate asset movement across different blockchains. The Infinity upgrade introduced “hooks,” programmable plug-ins that let liquidity pools adapt to varying strategies, including dynamic fees, tailored rebates, and on-chain limit orders triggered by user-defined conditions. The intent was to give liquidity providers greater control and to optimize trading experiences across an expanding ecosystem of connected networks.

Advertisement

In addition to the feature set, the upgrade also reduced pool-creation costs by up to 99%, which PancakeSwap framed as a measure to encourage experimentation and liquidity provisioning across chains. The company stressed that Infinity was designed with flexibility in mind, enabling multiple liquidity approaches and enabling developers to customize pool behavior without sacrificing core usability.

Base, launched later in 2025, represented the project’s move onto another major Ethereum layer-2. On Base, PancakeSwap Infinity again marketed cost savings for traders, claiming that ether-based trades against ERC-20 tokens could be significantly cheaper. This expansion aligns with broader industry interest in scaling Ethereum-based assets and reducing friction for users who want to move assets between Layer 1 and Layer 2 ecosystems while maintaining efficient execution and competitive fees. The emphasis on Base reflects a broader trend of DeFi platforms extending their reach to Layer-2 networks in pursuit of higher throughput and lower costs for on-chain activity.

Throughout these developments, ERC-20 remains a central element in the cross-chain narrative, given its role as the primary token standard for assets minted on Ethereum and widely adopted across L2s and sidechains. The practical implications of this reality are clear: as more protocols enable cross-chain swaps and multi-network liquidity, the compatibility and security of ERC-20 contracts—along with the associated wallets and bridges—becomes an ever more critical factor for users and developers alike.

In this context, the licensing debate between Curve and PancakeSwap serves as a reminder that DeFi’s future depends not only on clever feature design but also on the governance, licensing, and security frameworks that enable collaboration across networks. The dynamics of cross-chain liquidity—and the legal and technical safeguards that protect it—will likely shape how other protocols approach similar integrations in the months ahead. The industry will be watching closely to see whether licensing discussions translate into formal agreements, and whether security practices evolve in step with the increasingly interconnected DeFi landscape.

Advertisement

Why it matters

What makes this dispute notable is its potential to influence the pace and direction of DeFi interoperability. Licensing friction, if not resolved, could slow down the adoption of shared code and cross-chain features, prompting projects to pursue bespoke solutions rather than open collaborations. Conversely, a constructive licensing outcome could establish a template for responsible code reuse, enabling faster deployment of complex liquidity primitives while maintaining safeguards for users.

Beyond licensing, the case spotlights the broader risk-management challenges in DeFi. As protocols push dynamic fee schemes, programmable pools, and cross-chain bridges, the importance of robust security practices and audited codebases becomes more pronounced. The references to Saddle Finance’s 2022 incident and Balancer’s 2025 exploit highlight the real costs of insufficient safeguards, reinforcing the view that risk assessment must accompany innovation. In short, the industry is weighing how to balance rapid iteration with disciplined, verifiable security and licensing processes that protect users and the broader ecosystem.

For builders, the episode reinforces the value of collaboration under clear, enforceable terms and the importance of pre-emptive security design when deploying reusable components. For investors and users, it underscores the ongoing need to assess not just the functionality of new features but also the licensing posture and risk controls that accompany them. As cross-chain ecosystems mature, the ability to navigate legal and technical risk will be as critical as the product features themselves.

What to watch next

  • Public licensing negotiations between Curve and PancakeSwap: will a formal agreement or licensing framework emerge?
  • Security reviews and audits of Infinity’s hooks and cross-chain components, including any new penetration testing results.
  • Additional Infinity deployments on other networks and any changes to pool-creation economics or fee structures.
  • Regulatory and governance developments that could influence how open-source DeFi code is shared and deployed across ecosystems.

Sources & verification

  • Curve Finance X posts discussing licensing and collaboration for StableSwap features.
  • Curve Finance X posts emphasizing the need for deep stableswap expertise for safe integration and safety considerations.
  • PancakeSwap Infinity launch announcement and description of hooks and dynamic parameters.
  • Cross-chain swap developments and the Base deployment, including cost-structure improvements.
  • Historical references to Saddle Finance 2022 hack and Balancer’s $116 million exploit, cited as cautionary examples of swap-based code vulnerabilities.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin Faucet Revival: Block Confirms April 6 Launch Date

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Block confirms its Bitcoin faucet launches April 6, allowing users to collect free satoshis online.
  • The original Bitcoin faucet, created in 2010, distributed roughly 19,700 BTC before closing in 2012.
  • Block cut 40% of its workforce to refocus on Bitcoin, using AI-driven workflows to sustain operations.
  • Block’s product line now includes Cash App, Bitkey hardware wallet, and Proto Bitcoin mining systems. 

Bitcoin faucet is making a notable comeback, and Jack Dorsey’s Block is driving the effort. The company has confirmed Monday, April 6, as the official launch date.

Users will collect satoshis for free, closely mirroring the original model from 2010. Block currently holds 8,883 BTC, valued at around $594 million, on its balance sheet.

The revival reflects the firm’s continued focus on Bitcoin education and broader adoption.

The Origins and Evolution of Bitcoin Faucets

The original Bitcoin faucet launched in 2010, created by developer Gavin Andresen. His goal was straightforward: educate newcomers and promote adoption of the emerging digital currency.

Each Bitcoin address could claim 5 BTC at the time by solving a basic CAPTCHA. Those coins would be worth more than $330,000 in today’s market, had early recipients held them.

Advertisement

The site ran for about two years before shutting down in 2012. Over that period, it distributed roughly 19,700 BTC to participants around the world.

Block’s Bitcoin-focused account recently confirmed the return of this concept with a brief post: “The bitcoin faucet is back. 04.06.26 From btc.day.” The date in the post corresponds directly to the Monday launch schedule.

Since the original faucet closed, others have continued the model across various platforms. Modern faucets now often support multiple cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin alone.

Many rely on advertising revenue and microwallets to deliver small rewards consistently to users. Reputable platforms offer a beginner-friendly path into crypto, though caution around scam faucets remains necessary.

Advertisement

Block’s version stands apart due to its institutional resources and Bitcoin-only focus. The firm’s substantial BTC balance sheet provides a solid foundation for sustaining the program.

Free satoshis lower the entry barrier for newcomers exploring the space for the first time. The launch directly continues the educational mission that Andresen put in motion over 15 years ago.

Block’s Internal Shift and Expanding Bitcoin Products

Block recently restructured by cutting more than 4,000 jobs, approximately 40% of its total workforce. Dorsey described the move as a necessary step to refocus on core Bitcoin initiatives.

The company now relies on AI-driven development workflows to maintain output with leaner teams. Automated agents actively support reduced engineering staff across multiple product lines.

Advertisement

Dorsey and board director Roelof Botha back what they describe as a mini-AGI vision for Block. Their position is that AI can effectively replace several layers of traditional corporate coordination.

Smaller, focused teams can then operate more efficiently than larger conventional organizations. Block sees this internal model as a competitive advantage moving forward.

Block’s product line now extends well beyond Cash App’s peer-to-peer payment features. Bitkey is a self-custody hardware wallet for users who prefer direct control over their own Bitcoin.

Proto offers a range of Bitcoin mining systems for individuals looking to join the network. Together, these products reinforce Block’s position as a full-service Bitcoin company.

Advertisement

The Bitcoin faucet launch ties directly into this expanding product ecosystem. New users who receive free satoshis may later turn to Bitkey for secure storage solutions.

Others could explore Proto as a natural pathway into Bitcoin mining. The April 6 launch connects these offerings through a shared and accessible onboarding strategy.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin’s rangebound action could trigger bigger breakout, analyst says

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin has traded in a tight, directional lull, stubbornly holding below the $70,000 mark as traders await a decisive catalyst. With price action confined for weeks, analysts argue that the duration of this consolidation could magnify the eventual breakout, whichever direction it takes. Michael van de Poppe, founder of MN Trading Capital, framed the current phase as setting the stage for a potentially powerful move, noting that the longer the range persists, the more pronounced the ensuing breakout could be. He highlighted the key upside threshold of $71,000, a level Bitcoin hasn’t cleared since March 26, as a potential trigger for renewed momentum.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was hovering around the mid-$60,000s, roughly $66,900, according to CoinMarketCap. That price sits within a broader range established since a February low near $60,000, with resistance near $74,000 forming the upper bound. Over the past 30 days, the largest cryptocurrency has slipped about 8% in value, underscoring a risk-off mood that has dominated the sector even as selective traders look for catalysts to spark a fresh leg higher. The market’s measured pace contrasts with the volatility that preceded the recent cycle, underscoring the need for a clear trigger to ignite a sustainable move.

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin remains trapped in a narrow trading range beneath $70,000, with the upper boundary around $74,000 and a near-term pivot at $71,000.
  • Analyst Michael van de Poppe argues that a prolonged, quiet phase increases the potential magnitude of the next breakout, provided BTC can clear $71,000.
  • Market sentiment remains deeply negative, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index clustering in “Extreme Fear” at a score of 11, signaling subdued risk appetite.
  • Contrasting views warn of the possibility of a deeper bear scenario driven by macro conditions, while others doubt fresh cycle highs will appear soon, potentially delaying new all-time highs beyond 2026.

Bitcoin’s rangebound reality and the near-term map

Since carving a yearly trough near $60,000 on Feb. 6, Bitcoin has traded within a relatively tight corridor—from roughly $60,000 up to the mid-$70,000s. The current stance around $66,900 illustrates a market that has not committed to a directional breakout, even as macro winds remain uncertain. The lack of a clear break above the late-M-March milestone of $71,000 adds to the sense that participants are waiting for a definitive signal rather than chasing incremental moves. Price action in such environments often punctuates with a single, decisive swing, but the timing and texture of that swing remain highly contingent on evolving macro data and liquidity conditions.

For traders, a close above $71,000 could reframe the near-term setup, potentially inviting renewed buying pressure. Yet the lack of sustained conviction in the broader market has kept traders cautious about extrapolating a rapid ascent. Observers note that while the long-run trend remains uncertain, the risk-reward dynamics during a breakout could be outsized if momentum shifts decisively in BTC’s favor.

Diverse voices: a spectrum of outcomes for Bitcoin

The debate among prominent market observers underpins the current mood. On the optimistic side, Michael van de Poppe argues that a drawn-out consolidation tends to precede a stronger breakout. In a post on X, he emphasized that “the longer it lasts, the heavier the breakout will be,” underscoring the idea that patience in the market could yield a more powerful move once a clear directional bias emerges. He pointed to a potential breakout through $71,000 as a critical inflection point that has lingered out of reach since late March. For traders aiming to capitalize on a shift in momentum, the path of least resistance appears to hinge on clearing that threshold with conviction and a commensurate rise in volume.

Advertisement

Not all voices share the same optimism. Willy Woo, a veteran on-chain analyst, has warned of the possibility of a deeper bear scenario, citing macro conditions that could undermine the secular bull narrative. In a post on X, Woo suggested that a breakdown in the broader macro environment could open the door to further downside pressure, even if a temporary bounce occurs in the short term. The caution reflects a broader concern that macro cycles and liquidity dynamics can override intra-market signals during times of global financial stress.

Another seasoned price commentator, Peter Brandt, recently offered a longer-horizon view that challenges the likelihood of new Bitcoin highs within 2026. Brandt indicated that, based on his assessment of historical cycles and macro considerations, a fresh cycle peak might be more plausible in 2027 rather than this year. His perspective helps contextualize the divergence between near-term price action and longer-term expectations, illustrating how different time horizons can yield contrasting conclusions about Bitcoin’s trajectory.

The juxtaposition of these viewpoints—range-based patience from some, macro-driven caution from others, and longer-horizon skepticism from veteran traders—illustrates that the market awaits a decisive catalyst before committing to a new directional wave. In such environments, liquidity, macro indicators, and regulatory developments often serve as the catalysts that tip the balance.

Sentiment, risk appetite, and what to watch next

The current mood in crypto markets is reflected in sentiment gauges, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index lingering in the deepest levels of fear. A reading of 11 out of 100 signals a risk-off stance among participants and elevated caution around new allocations to risk assets. This backdrop suggests that even a constructive technical setup could be tempered by a cautious macro stance, as traders seek higher confidence before committing capital to a run of gains.

Advertisement

As the narrative unfolds, traders will likely monitor a handful of near-term triggers. A clean close above $71,000 on strong volume could rekindle upside momentum and draw in short-term momentum players. Conversely, a break decisively below the February low near $60,000 could sharpen downside pressure and renew talk of deeper retracements. Beyond price levels, macro developments—such as shifts in liquidity conditions, inflation data, and policy signals—will shape Bitcoin’s path more than any single technical pattern in the days ahead.

In the broader context, the debate around Bitcoin’s next major move remains unresolved. While some analysts anticipate an imminent uplift, others highlight the weight of macro forces that could extend the bear phase. The coming weeks will be telling as market participants weigh technical cues against macro realities and continue to parse signals from on-chain activity, derivatives positioning, and cross-asset liquidity flows.

For readers and participants, the key takeaway is that the near-term outlook hinges on a catalyst capable of turning a range into a directional move. Whether that catalyst arrives in the form of a sustained break above $71,000, a decisive break below $60,000, or a macro development that reorders risk sentiment, the market’s next leg will likely be driven by a combination of price action, volume, and external factors rather than a single indicator.

As markets monitor these dynamics, investors should stay alert to potential shifts in liquidity and risk appetite that could accelerate Bitcoin’s next chapter. The coming sessions will reveal whether the current consolidation is merely a pause before a new leg higher, or a precursor to a deeper restructuring of the market’s macro regime.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Naoris Launches First NIST-Approved Quantum-Resistant BC

Published

on

OpenAI buys tech talk show TBPN as it builds out communication strategy

Naoris Protocol has gone live with its quantum-resistant blockchain mainnet, becoming the first Layer 1 network built entirely on post-quantum cryptography approved by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology — a milestone arriving as researchers shorten timelines for a threat that could compromise Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Summary

  • Naoris Protocol launched its quantum-resistant mainnet on April 1, 2026, using NIST-approved post-quantum cryptography standards finalized in August 2024
  • The testnet phase processed over 106 million post-quantum transactions and mitigated more than 603 million security threats, with over one million security nodes activated globally
  • The NAORIS token carries a market cap of approximately $36 million at launch; the network is in an invite-only phase for validator operators

“Mainnet represents the transition from proof-of-concept to production infrastructure. The network has already validated over 100 million transactions using post-quantum cryptography. That is not a roadmap promise; it is measured, operational capacity,” said Nathaniel Szerezla, Chief Growth Officer of Naoris Protocol.

The mainnet runs on NIST’s ML-DSA algorithm — the standardized version of CRYSTALS-Dilithium, published as FIPS 204 — for all transaction signatures. The system enforces an “irreversible security transition”: once a user adopts post-quantum keys, the protocol automatically blocks any subsequent transaction attempts using classical cryptographic methods.

Advertisement

The Quantum Insider confirmed that the launch is directly timed to accelerating regulatory pressure: Google published research in late March 2026 estimating that breaking Bitcoin’s elliptic curve cryptography would require fewer than 500,000 qubits — far below previous estimates — while Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin outlined a quantum migration plan in February 2026.

Why Timing Matters

NIST finalized its post-quantum cryptographic standards in August 2024. The European Commission has mandated member states begin national post-quantum strategies by 2026, with full migration required by 2035. The White House’s National Cybersecurity Strategy in March 2026 accelerated federal adoption of post-quantum cryptography.

Industry analysts have warned that approximately 4.5 million Bitcoin sit in addresses with exposed public keys, potentially vulnerable once quantum capability reaches the necessary threshold. Naoris Protocol’s CEO first outlined this threat model in detail, warning that “harvest now, decrypt later” attacks are already underway — meaning encrypted data is being collected today in anticipation of future decryption capability.

Advertisement

What the Network Offers

Naoris operates as a Sub-Zero Layer — infrastructure positioned beneath traditional L1 and L2 networks, designed to secure validators, wallets, exchanges, DeFi protocols, and cross-chain bridges. Users who move assets to Naoris receive quantum-resistant protection; assets remaining on classical chains stay exposed.

“Assets moved to Naoris become quantum-secure, while assets left on classical chains remain vulnerable. The earlier users migrate, the smaller their exposure window,” Szerezla told Decrypt. In September 2025, Naoris was cited in an SEC research submission as the reference model for the Post-Quantum Financial Infrastructure Framework (PQFIF).

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto Custody Gets a Boost as Coinbase Advances Toward U.S. National Trust Status

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Coinbase has secured conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for a national trust charter. The decision signals progress toward federal oversight of its custody business and strengthens its position in institutional crypto infrastructure.

Coinbase Moves Toward Federal Custody Framework

Bitcoin traded near $68,000 as markets absorbed regulatory developments in the United States. Meanwhile, Coinbase advanced its institutional strategy with a key approval milestone. The company aims to expand federally supervised custody services.

The OCC granted conditional approval for Coinbase National Trust Company after reviewing its application. The regulator outlined requirements that Coinbase must meet before receiving full authorization. These conditions include compliance systems, governance frameworks, and risk controls.

The approval does not permit deposit-taking or lending activities under the trust structure. Instead, Coinbase will focus on custody, staking, and fiduciary services for institutions. This model aligns with existing trust company frameworks used in financial markets.

Advertisement

Conditions Highlight Compliance and Risk Controls

Coinbase must satisfy several operational and regulatory conditions before launching the trust entity. These include anti-money laundering programs and know-your-customer procedures. The company must also meet capital and liquidity standards set by regulators.

Additionally, Coinbase needs to demonstrate strong governance and internal risk management systems. The OCC requires an operating agreement that defines oversight and reporting obligations. Only after meeting these conditions will the regulator grant full approval.

The timeline for completion remains uncertain, although similar approvals took several months. Coinbase filed its application in October 2025, and the review extended beyond earlier cases. The scale of assets under custody likely influenced the extended review process.

Institutional Demand Drives Charter Strategy

Ethereum traded near $3,400 as institutional participation continued to expand across digital asset markets. Meanwhile, Coinbase reported hundreds of billions in assets under custody. This scale highlights its importance in institutional crypto infrastructure.

Advertisement

The company already serves as custodian for several U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. A federal charter would enhance its credibility among pension funds and asset managers. These clients often require federally regulated counterparties for custody services.

Moreover, the charter enables Coinbase to operate under a unified national regulatory framework. This reduces reliance on state-level licensing systems such as those in New York. It also simplifies compliance across multiple jurisdictions.

Regulatory Context and Industry Competition

Ripple Labs, Circle, and Paxos have also received similar conditional approvals. The OCC has expanded its oversight of crypto-native firms through these charters. Each company must independently meet pre-opening conditions before operating.

At the same time, Binance continues to lead in global trading volumes. However, Coinbase holds a significant share of institutional custody assets. This distinction reinforces its focus on regulated financial infrastructure.

Advertisement

The broader regulatory environment remains complex, with ongoing debates in Congress over digital asset legislation. Coinbase has also engaged in legal actions to defend certain product offerings. These developments reflect evolving oversight across the crypto sector.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tether May Delay Fundraising If Demand Falls Short at $500B Valuation

Published

on

Tether May Delay Fundraising If Demand Falls Short at $500B Valuation

Tether is pressuring investors to commit to a fundraising round at a $500 billion valuation within the next two weeks, saying that it may delay the raise if demand falls short.

The El Salvador-based firm has been seeking fresh capital since late last year but has faced resistance from investors wary of the valuation, The Information reported Friday, citing unnamed sources. If commitments fall short of expectations, the company is likely to delay the raise.

The $500 billion target would place Tether among the world’s largest financial firms, exceeding every US bank except JPMorgan Chase. JPMorgan, the largest bank in the world, has a market capitalization of about $794.55 billion, while the second-largest bank in the country, Bank of America, has a market cap of $352.86 billion.

Tether’s USDt (USDT) stablecoin, the world’s largest stablecoin, currently has a market cap of $184 billion. The company’s other top products include Tether Gold (XAUt) and Tether EURt (EURt), pegged to the euro.

Advertisement
USDt market cap. Source: CoinMarketCap

Related: Stablecoin supply reaches $315B in Q1 as USDC rises, USDT declines

Tether explores fundraising

In September last year, Bloomberg reported that Tether was exploring a fundraising round of up to $20 billion that could value the company at around $500 billion. The firm was considering raising $15 billion to $20 billion through a private placement for roughly a 3% stake, with Cantor Fitzgerald acting as lead adviser.

Following the report, CEO Paolo Ardoino said on X that the company was exploring a raise from a select group of investors to expand across “existing and new business lines (stablecoins, distribution ubiquity, AI, commodity trading, energy, communications, media) by several orders of magnitude.”

However, in a comment to Cointelegraph in February, Ardoino denied reports that it planned to raise up to $20 billion, saying earlier figures were hypothetical scenarios rather than an active fundraising plan. Still, he defended the $500 billion valuation, comparing the company’s profits to AI platforms such as OpenAI.

Cointelegraph reached out to Tether for comment, but did not get a response by publication.

Advertisement

Related: Tether says ‘Big Four‘ firm to handle first full audit of USDT reserves

Tether taps KPMG for first full audit od USDt

Meanwhile, Tether has reportedly hired KPMG to conduct its first full audit of USDt’s financial statements, with PwC assisting in preparing internal systems, according to the Financial Times. The move follows years of relying on reserve attestations from BDO Italia rather than a comprehensive audit.

A full audit would go beyond reserve snapshots to examine assets, liabilities and internal controls across Tether’s balance sheet.

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum — BIP-360 co-author

Advertisement