Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Death of the oldest living tortoise was just a crypto scam

Published

on

Death of the oldest living tortoise was just a crypto scam

The reported death of Jonathan, the world’s oldest tortoise, was instead a ploy by crypto scammers to trick people into buying an unaffiliated cryptocurrency.

Major news outlets such as the BBC, USA Today, and Daily Mail reported that Jonathan, a Seychelles giant tortoise, passed away yesterday at the age of 194.

The publications based the reports on the claims of “@JoeHollinsVet,” an X account that claimed to be his veterinarian. 

The account announced, “Heartbroken to share that our beloved Jonathan, the world’s oldest living land animal, has passed away today peacefully on St. Helena.”

Advertisement

It said, “As his vet for many years, it was an honor to care for him—hand-feeding bananas, watching him bask in the sun, and marveling at his quiet wisdom.”

Thankfully, none of it was true. Jonathan’s real-life veterinarian, still named Joe Hollins, confirmed to USA Today that they don’t have an account on X and that the posts are a hoax. 

Read more: Apple support imposter to pay back $1.2M after stealing NFTs and crypto

He said, “Jonathan the tortoise is very much alive. I believe on X the person purporting to be me is asking for crypto donations, so it’s not even an April Fool joke. It’s a con.”

Advertisement

Jonathan the tortoise does not care for crypto

Jonathan has lived in a sanctuary on the island of St Helena since 1882. Here, at the plantation house owned by the island’s governor, Nigel Phillips, Jonathan spends his days as one of the oldest known living land mammals to date.

He reportedly suffers from cataracts and has lost his sense of smell. Regardless, he is still healthy and maintains an active libido with two younger tortoises on the island. 

When Phillips woke up to the false reports, he rushed to check if Jonathan was okay and discovered him sleeping under a tree in his paddock.

Phillips told The Guardian that Jonathan often likes to graze on grass and that, “One day a week he is fed fruit, veg and salad to ensure he gets essential minerals. He has a sweet tooth. Tourists occasionally come to view him, but that is carefully managed to ensure the animals are not stressed.”

Advertisement

The pretender account, which is based in Brazil, is claiming that it was all just an April Fools’ joke. 

Protos has removed the crypto address out of respect for Jonathan.

This is despite the account claiming earlier, while promoting another Jonathan-themed account with a linked memecoin, that it wasn’t an April Fools’ joke.

The X account shared the memecoin’s crypto address and also had it in its bio, but it has since removed it. 

The market cap of the Jonathan-themed token shot up 376% from $25,000 to $119,000 during yesterday’s false posts. 

It has since fallen back down to $34,000 and now sits at $74,000 at the time of writing.

Advertisement

Read more: Inside the $280M Drift hack: weeks of setup, minutes to drain

Messy crypto April Fools

Other questionable April Fools jokes yesterday included a fake acquisition that moved the price of a protocol firm’s token, $LQTY, drawing accusations of market manipulation. 

Another crypto firm called Hyperbridge claimed it was breached as part of an April Fools’ joke. Unfortunately, a crypto protocol called Drift was actually hacked later that day, and I had to stress that it wasn’t an April Fools’ joke. 

The protocol lost roughly $280 million to the hackers after a week-long operation managed to exploit its multisig wallet.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

CFTC Sues 3 US States, Claims Sole Authority Over Prediction Markets

Published

on

CFTC, Arizona, US Government, United States, Prediction Markets

The Trump administration is suing Illinois, Connecticut, Arizona, and their gaming regulators over the federal government’s right to regulate prediction markets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the US Department of Justice filed separate lawsuits on Thursday against the three states.

In 2025, those states and their gaming regulators sent cease and desist letters to prediction platforms, including Kalshi and Polymarket, claiming that the event contracts offered by the platforms violated state gambling laws and licensing requirements.

The federal financial regulator’s lawsuit against Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, Attorney General Kwame Raoul and the Illinois Gaming Board argues that the Illinois Gaming Board overstepped its authority by categorizing event contracts as “wagers” or “sports betting” instead of asset swaps. 

Advertisement
CFTC, Arizona, US Government, United States, Prediction Markets
CFTC lawsuit against Illinois public officials and the Illinois Gaming Board. Source: Court Listener

In each of the three lawsuits, the CFTC maintains that it has “exclusive jurisdiction” to regulate “Designated Contract Markets (DCMs),” which include prediction platforms, under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). The Illinois lawsuit said:

“Illinois’s attempt to shut down federally regulated DCMs intrudes on the exclusive federal scheme Congress designed to oversee national swaps markets. Prompted by the evolution of national financial markets and repeated conflicts with state law.”

“Unless restrained and enjoined by the court, defendants are likely to continue their attempts to subvert federal law and the exclusive jurisdiction to regulate event contract swaps conferred on the CFTC by Congress,” the lawsuit filing said.

The CFTC lawsuit comes amid increased legal scrutiny of prediction markets by US lawmakers and regulators, as 11 states pursue legal action against prediction market platforms.

Related: CFTC’s top enforcer puts prediction market insider traders on notice

CFTC chief pushes back as legal pressure on prediction markets intensifies

“These states’ aggressive and overzealous attempts to overstep the CFTC have led to market uncertainty and risks destabilizing effects for market participants and our registrants,” CFTC Chairman Mike Selig said after the lawsuits were filed.

Advertisement
CFTC, Arizona, US Government, United States, Prediction Markets
Source: Mike Selig

State regulators in Arizona, Nevada, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Montana, Ohio, Connecticut, Tennessee, New York and Massachusetts have taken legal action against prediction markets.

At the same time, Congressional lawmakers are attempting to push through legislative proposals that would ban sports-related event contracts and prevent political insiders from participating in prediction markets tied to war

Magazine: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket — AI Eye