PUNCH spikes ~22,290% in a week as analysts flag concentrated supply and rug‑pull risk.

The parabolic move comes as digital assets continue to trade as the purest expression of macro risk appetite. Bitcoin (BTC) is hovering around $67,739, with a 24‑hour range between roughly $67,070 and $67,739. Ethereum (ETH) changes hands near $1,939, down about 1.5% over the last day on more than $17.2B in volume. Solana (SOL) trades around $83.77, up roughly 1.7% in 24 hours.

For traders piling into PUNCH, the lesson is old: meme‑coin manias can look orderly and unstoppable right up until the exit disappears.

Dubai is moving ahead with a staged rollout of tokenized real estate, expanding a pilot program that couples regulated on-chain transfers with a real-world asset class. In parallel, the Maldives is drawing attention with a Trump-branded resort project that’s being explored for tokenization, signaling a broader push to finance large-scale developments through security tokens and distributed-ledger technology. The Dubai Land Department (DLD) said on Friday it would launch the second phase of its real estate tokenization pilot, following a prior milestone that tokenized roughly $5 million of property and produced about 7.8 million tradable tokens. The move underscores a growing belief among regulators and industry participants that tokenized real estate can unlock liquidity and widen investor access in markets where property is often illiquid and access is constrained. The effort uses a governance and settlement framework built by Ctrl Alt, a Dubai-licensed Virtual Asset Service Provider, to issue Asset-Referenced Virtual Asset management tokens intended for secondary-market trading. The on-chain transactions underpinning these tokens are recorded on the XRP Ledger (CRYPTO: XRP) and secured by Ripple Custody, illustrating a cross-border, regulated infrastructure that pairs real assets with blockchain settlement.

The plan, while ambitious, is grounded in concrete numbers. In its May 2025 forecast, Ctrl Alt and the DLD estimated that tokenization could contribute as much as $16 billion to Dubai’s real estate ecosystem by 2033—a figure equating to roughly 7% of the emirate’s overall property transactions over that period. Industry observers have noted that Dubai’s combination of a robust real estate market and a comparatively crypto-friendly regulatory environment helps explain why the emirate has emerged as a leading hub for tokenized assets. A veteran player in the Middle East crypto scene, Rep. Ripple’s footprint in the region has been discussed in multiple industry circles, including coverage linking Ripple’s leadership with regulatory engagement at the White House level.

The tokenization stack for the pilot hinges on Asset-Referenced Virtual Asset management tokens, a structure that allows the transfer of tokenized real estate units on secondary markets once the underlying property rights are tokenized and registered. Ctrl Alt, which operates with a Dubai license as a Virtual Asset Service Provider, is responsible for issuing these activity-backed tokens and enabling their circulation. All on-chain activity tied to these assets is recorded on the XRP Ledger (CRYPTO: XRP) and safeguarded by Ripple Custody, a custody solution designed for regulated digital assets. The architecture aims to pair familiar property investment mechanics with the transparency and settlement efficiency of blockchain rails, potentially broadening the pool of investors who can participate in high-value projects that historically required significant upfront capital.

While the DLD’s initiative is focused on Dubai’s boundaries, its implications resonate across the region. The project’s backers argue that tokenized real estate can unlock fractional ownership, streamline property sales, and enable more efficient price discovery in markets that have long relied on traditional, paper-based processes. In addition to the Dubai pilot, a related development is unfolding in the Maldives, where DarGlobal and World Liberty Financial—backed by interests connected to U.S. political circles—are pursuing a tokenization strategy for a Trump-branded resort development. The collaboration with Securitize aims to tokenize the development’s phased rollout, signaling a growing appetite among developers and fintech groups to use tokenized securities as a capital-raising tool for premium hospitality projects. A video presentation accompanying the Maldives project has circulated, with a public event at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate drawing notable attendees from both traditional finance and the crypto sector, including figures such as Goldman Sachs’ leadership and Coinbase’s chief executive, among others.

On a practical level, the Dubai project’s use of on-chain settlement backed by a regulated custodian reflects a broader industry trend: blending tokenized liquidity with real-world asset verification and custody to address risk and regulatory compliance. The CBD-led focus on asset-backed tokens aligns with ongoing discussions among policymakers about the role of digital assets in mainstream finance, particularly in real assets that can provide enduring value and tangible diversification for investors. The Dubai project’s framing as a pilot with a finite number of tokens and traceable on-chain activity helps test the viability of tokenized real estate as a legitimate financing mechanism rather than a speculative vehicle.

In parallel, the Maldives tokenization effort is framed as a tangible path for hospitality real estate to access a broader investor base. Ziad El Chaar, the CEO of DarGlobal, told Cointelegraph that tokenization could “take over the way other projects are being funded” by broadening participation beyond traditional high-net-worth circles. He emphasized that tokenization can democratize access to real estate investments by lowering the entry barrier for many potential investors who previously faced geographic, regulatory, or accreditation hurdles. World Liberty’s leadership championed the approach at a crypto-focused event hosted at Mar-a-Lago, highlighting the potential for tokenized offerings to accelerate capital formation for large-scale developments and to introduce new sources of liquidity to projects that were historically constrained by the capital markets’ tempo and risk profile. The event itself drew attention from a cross-section of participants, including leaders from traditional finance and the crypto industry, signaling that the lines between these realms continue to blur as digital asset structures mature.

As with any tokenization initiative, critical questions remain about regulatory alignment, investor protections, and the pace at which markets will absorb these instruments. The DLD’s May 2025 projection provides a target trajectory, but actual outcomes will depend on several factors, including the evolution of custody arrangements, the effectiveness of on-chain governance mechanisms, and the ability of the tokens to achieve reliable liquidity in secondary markets. Still, proponents argue that the Dubai model—grounded in a regulator-approved framework, a licensed tech partner, and a trusted custody solution—could serve as a blueprint for other jurisdictions seeking to harness tokenized assets to unlock liquidity in real estate while preserving investor protections. The Maldives project, if realized, would offer a high-profile test case for cross-border, hospitality-focused tokenization, potentially inspiring similar efforts in other tourism-heavy markets that require substantial capital for large-scale development projects.

For those tracking the intersection of crypto innovation and traditional property markets, these developments illustrate how nations with sophisticated real estate ecosystems are exploring how to use tokenization as a bridge to greater liquidity and broader investor access. While the path to broad adoption remains uneven and requires careful calibration of regulatory, custody, and market-making capabilities, the Dubai and Maldives initiatives underscore a wider move toward tokenized, asset-backed finance that could reshape how capital flows into real estate over the coming years.

Video and public discussions associated with the Maldives project are accessible via the accompanying materials, including a discussion that explored the role of tokenization in altering how projects are funded and who can participate in investment opportunities. A clip linked to the event and to related regulatory debates can be found here: Video discussion. The broader narrative around this trend includes references to policy dialogues and public-private collaborations that continue to shape how tokenized assets are perceived and regulated in different markets.

Related materials and commentary, including coverage of Ripple’s regulatory engagements and the evolving regulatory landscape for crypto-linked real estate, are referenced in the linked sources. For readers seeking to verify specifics, the primary documents and statements come from the Dubai Land Department’s press resources and Ctrl Alt’s official communications, as well as the associated press coverage of the Maldives project and the stakeholder discussions that accompanied the Mar-a-Lago event. The public-facing summaries of these initiatives highlight the ongoing collaboration between technology providers, property developers, and financial institutions as they experiment with tokenized real estate under regulated frameworks.

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Why it matters

The Dubai and Maldives tokenization initiatives capture a moment when regulated digital assets and real assets begin to converge in practical, high-value applications. Tokenized real estate has the potential to lower barriers to entry for investors, improve liquidity for often illiquid property markets, and stimulate faster price discovery through transparent on-chain activity. If the Dubai pilot scales toward the projected $16 billion by 2033, it could influence how developers structure funding for large projects and how regulators balance investor protection with the need to foster innovation. The Maldives project, connected to a high-profile hospitality development, underscores how tokenization could redefine project finance for premium destinations that require substantial upfront capital. Taken together, these efforts reflect a broader shift in capital markets where asset-backed digital tokens are increasingly viewed as tools for efficient liquidity, cross-border investment, and regulatory-compliant innovation.

At the same time, the path forward will require careful attention to custody, governance, and auditability. The use of the XRP Ledger with a regulated custody framework provides a credible model for secure settlement, while the involvement of a licensed VASP signals a regulatory track record that investors increasingly expect when dealing with tokenized real assets. The cross-border nature of these projects—spanning Dubai and the Maldives—also highlights the importance of harmonizing standards and ensuring that digital asset transactions remain compliant with local laws and international best practices. As institutions observe the outcomes of these pilots, the market will gain clarity on how tokenized real estate can coexist with traditional property markets, potentially unlocking a new spectrum of investment opportunities for both regional players and global capital pools.

What to watch next

• Milestones for Phase Two: timeline and go-live details from the Dubai Land Department.
• Secondary-market activity: liquidity, pricing, and investor participation metrics for tokenized assets in Dubai.
• Maldives project progress: partner confirmations with Securitize, issuance milestones, and regulatory updates.
• Regulatory updates: developments in asset-backed tokens, custody standards, and cross-border tokenization guidelines.
• Institutional interest: reactions from large financial players and potential participation in related tokenized offerings.

Sources & verification

• Ctrl Alt and Dubai Land Department press release announcing the Phase Two tokenization pilot and the $16 billion by 2033 forecast (https://www.ctrl-alt.co/press-releases/ctrl-alt-dld-phase-two).
• PR Newswire: Ctrl Alt and Dubai Land Department go live with tokenized real estate, forecasting $16B by 2033 (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ctrl-alt-and-dubai-land-department-go-live-with-tokenized-real-estate-forecasts-16b-market-by-2033-302464840.html).
• Reece Merrick, Ripple’s managing director for the Middle East and Africa, with a cited post referenced in coverage (https://x.com/reece_merrick/status/2024761451060351272).
• Cointelegraph coverage on the Maldives Trump-branded resort tokenization through DarGlobal and World Liberty Financial (https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-tradfi-execs-mingle-trump-crypto-event).
• Related coverage on Ripple’s regulatory interactions and White House meetings (https://cointelegraph.com/news/ripple-ceo-white-house-meeting-crypto-banking-clarity).

Tokenized real estate moves accelerate in Dubai and Maldives

Dubai’s ambitious plan to tokenize real estate is designed to test whether regulated, asset-backed tokens can deliver faster settlement, greater liquidity, and wider access to property investments without compromising investor protections. By recording transactions on the XRP Ledger (CRYPTO: XRP) and securing them with Ripple Custody, the pilot attempts to bridge the traditional real estate sector with the demands of modern digital asset markets. Ctrl Alt’s role as a licensed VASP stands at the center of this architecture, providing the issuance framework, governance oversight, and technical infrastructure required to support asset-backed token transfers that can move quickly on secondary markets. The stated objective is not merely to tokenize a property tranche but to establish a repeatable model that could be scaled across additional properties and markets, provided the pilots demonstrate robustness and regulatory alignment.

Meanwhile, the Maldives initiative showcases the willingness of developers to leverage tokenization for increasingly premium projects. The collaboration between DarGlobal, World Liberty Financial, and Securitize points to a future where hospitality ventures may seek multiple financing channels, combining traditional equity with digital securities that enable global participation. The public announcements and the presence of high-profile attendees at a Mar-a-Lago event signal that the tokenization story has moved from niche experiments to discussions with mainstream financiers and policymakers. If these pilots succeed, they could influence how other jurisdictions structure real estate finance, offering a model where property rights are tokenized, traded, and settled with the efficiency of blockchain rails while preserving the governance and due-diligence standards expected by regulated markets.

The trajectory hinges on several key levers: the ability to maintain secure custody and compliant on-chain settlement; the clarity of regulatory expectations for asset-backed tokens; and the market’s appetite for fractionalized real estate exposure in a risk-managed format. The Dubai pilot already demonstrates a potential pathway for real estate tokenization that emphasizes transparency, custody, and on-chain traceability, which could help build trust among institutional investors who demand rigorous risk controls. As the landscape evolves, the industry will watch how these pilots influence the broader ecosystem of tokenized assets, including potential spillovers into related sectors such as infrastructure financing, urban development projects, and cross-border investment strategies. For investors and builders alike, the Dubai and Maldives efforts offer a glimpse into a future where real estate can be financed and traded with the tools and efficiencies of digital asset markets, while anchored in the solidity of regulated frameworks and custody assurances.

As AI-generated content overtakes human-written material online, tools like ZeroGPT are becoming essential for education, journalism, and enterprise to safeguard authenticity.

The internet continues to be inundated with massive machine-generated content ever since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022. AI-generated content has spread like wildfire, and a new category of detection tools like ZeroGPT are racing to keep up.

The numbers are striking. In November 2024, the number of AI-generated content published on the web had surpassed the volume written by humans. This milestone, uncovered by growth agency Graphite in an analysis of 65,000 English web pages, found that 50.8% of articles published that month were AI-generated.

Graphite’s discovery was no anomaly. In April 2025, SEO and marketing intelligence platform Ahrefs reported that 74.2% of content spanning 900,000 English-language URLs had some element of AI. 

But volume is only part of the problem. What’s more concerning is that this sheer volume is fueling misinformation and disinformation campaigns and eroding academic integrity. The harder question that everyone is grappling with right now is: how can someone know what’s real?

The academic integrity crisis

The AI content surge has landed harder in education — a sector where the authenticity of written work is key. According to an investigation by Gurdian, 7,000 university students in the UK were caught cheating using AI tools in the 2023-24 academic year. This translates to 5.1 out of 1,000 students, up from 1.6 in the previous academic year. In the 2024-25 academic calendar, the number had gone up to 7.5 cases per 1,000 students.

Globally, student discipline rate for AI-related academic misconduct climbed from 48% in 2022–23 to 64% in 2024–25. Approximately 90% of students have confessed to knowing about ChatGPT, and 89% have used it for homework. The weight of the matter has pushed many institutions to impose strict regulations on AI use and adopt robust detection tools.

But having the will to detect AI content and having reliable tools to do it are two different things.

Enter the AI-content detectors

The detection market has grown in tandem with the problem it’s trying to solve. Tools like Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality have moved from niche utilities to essential institutional infrastructure. Each takes a different approach to the same fundamental challenge of identifying the statistical and linguistic patterns that AI language models leave behind.

AI detector ZeroGPT, one of the most widely used tools on the market, has built its product on accessibility and accuracy. The platform was trained on massive text data collected from the internet, educational data, and its in-house AI datasets, and can detect content generated by ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, and many other major large language models with up 98% accuracy.

The platform also offers a plagiarism checker, a built-in paraphraser, grammar checker, summarizer, humanize AI, and translator, making it a multi-purpose writing toolkit rather than a single-use scanner.

What sets ZeroGPT apart from other detectors is its availability on WhatsApp and Telegram. Anyone can access ChatGPT’s features, such as AI detection, paraphrasing, and grammar error checking via a chatbot right inside WhatsApp and Telegram, without having to visit the official website.

Perhaps most striking is that ZeroGPT requires no sign-up for basic use. In a market where many competitors gate core features behind registration walls or paywalls, that accessibility has helped it reach millions of users across education, marketing, journalism, and enterprise compliance.

For organizations that need to embed detection into their existing workflows, ZeroGPT offers an API built around RESTful architecture with fast response times. The API can be integrated with learning management systems, editorial platforms, HR tools for reviewing application materials, and compliance monitoring systems. 

The platform also supports multilingual detection across different languages. This feature matters the most in global academic settings where non-English AI content is equally prevalent.

The cost to keep academic integrity

The cost to keep academic integrity is placing a substantial financial burden on institutions. It is estimated that the administrative effort, legal review, and academic committee proceedings associated with one misconduct case cost an average of $3,200 to $8,500. 

And that cost is just the tip of the iceberg because institutions are spending at least $50,000 per year to train their staff on how to identify AI-generated content. Institutions also suffer from enrolment declines when cases of academic scandals break out to the public.

The need for AI-content detectors in academia is no longer a luxury; it is a necessity. Tools like ZeroGPT are helping institutions safeguard academic honesty, while at the same time significantly cutting the expenses linked to academic misconduct investigations.

On a larger scale, AI detectors are helping to prevent what the researcher Aviv Ovadya calls infocalypse: an internet where synthetic media reduces public trust, as no one knows who created what they are looking at or the intent.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tokens on Base are leading the market again, with established tokens like VVV and TIBBIR outperforming, while new launches are turning heads but also drawing criticism from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin.

TIBBIR and VVV are up 16% and 23%, respectively over the last 24 hours, and sentiment surrounding the AI sector continues to slowly make a comeback after flaming out in 2025.

As is tradition, new market leaders attract increased attention to new launches, and one making a lot of noise despite its relatively small valuation is CONWAY.

Developer Sigil Wen, a Fellow at Peter Thiel’s Thiel Fellowship, published an article on what he calls “Web 4.0,” in which AI is intended to earn and improve its own existence through automation and open web access.

Wen’s work has caught the attention of the broader AI development community beyond those who focus solely on crypto-adjacent work, and yesterday he announced that he will use fees accrued by the community-made CONWAY token to scale the “Conway Ecosystem”.

As a result, the CONWAY token soared to a market capitalization of $12 million before retracing sharply today.

Following the token’s brief explosion, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin took to X to criticize Wen’s vision, saying, “This is wrong.”

Buterin argued that putting more distance between humans and AIs is “not a good thing for the world” as “the point of Ethereum is to set *us* free, not to create something else that goes off and does some stuff freely while our own situation is unchanged or worsened.”

Wen, however, argues that the automation and issue Buterin is looking to avoid is inevitable, calling it “democratic input into AI.”

The back-and-forth has potentially shaken some $CONWAY holders’ confidence, and the token is down 55% over the last 24 hours, trading at a $3 million valuation. The market has seen a number of new “AI community-led tokens” in 2026, all of which have burned out quickly as developers distanced themselves from them.

The future of CONWAY remains to be seen, but while the trenches fight over the next big thing, established agentic AI tokens such as TIBBIR and VVV continue to lead the charge.

Hyperliquid price rebounded 6% on Friday shortly after the decentralized perpetual futures exchange revealed the launch of a new advocacy group in Washington. This fresh catalyst has investors questioning whether HYPE can finally recover from its losses throughout the year.

According to data from crypto.news, Hyperliquid (HYPE) price rebounded over 6% on Friday morning during Asian trading hours before settling around $29.23 at the time of writing. 

HYPE’s price saw a notable uptick following the launch of the Hyperliquid Policy Center in Washington, D.C. This new advocacy and research nonprofit is dedicated to securing regulatory clarity for decentralized finance, specifically targeting on-chain derivatives and perpetual futures.

To jumpstart the initiative, the Hyper Foundation, the ecosystem’s independent growth arm, committed 1 million HYPE tokens, valued at approximately $29 million, as reported earlier by crypto.news.

As Hyperliquid takes on a leading role in framing the regulatory landscape for the decentralized industry, it is likely to benefit from the exposure and visibility, which could support long term adoption.

However, the impact of such a strategic move on HYPE’s long-term price action may be undercut as the project’s on-chain stats still point to weakness.

Data from DeFiLlama show that the total value locked in the network has dropped from $4.7 billion recorded on to $4.2 billion at the time of writing. At the same time, the weekly revenue generated by DeFi protocols on the network has slumped 55% to $11.83 million since Feb. 9.

Such a drop in TVL and revenue can be interpreted as a fundamental erosion of network utility and engagement, which inevitably dampens investor demand.

Looking ahead, another major headwind for Hyperliquid price is a 9.92 million token unlock set for March 6. 

At press time, the upcoming unlock was worth around $291 million and represented 2.72% of the total circulating supply. Token unlocks can drive prices lower, especially if there’s not enough demand from new buyers to absorb the liquidity.

The latest recovery also follows a difficult period where the token fell over 25% from its yearly high of $37.84.

On the daily chart, Hyperliquid price has been trading under a descending trendline that has served as a dynamic resistance level since early February, suggesting that bears continue to dominate the market by capping any recovery attempts by bulls.

The ongoing bearish market, driven by Bitcoin’s failure to retain key support levels, has also added to investor caution and hurt HYPE price.

The Aroon indicator largely remains in support of a continuation of the bearish trend, with the Aroon Down at 92.86%, which means selling pressure still stands at an extreme level. 

Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index metric has formed a falling channel slipping below neutral territory, a sign that momentum remains weak.

For now, the key support for Hyperliquid price lies at $28, which aligns with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level, where bulls could lodge a defense and spark a healthy correction. However, a breach below this level could embolden bears to push for lower prices toward $21, the next key support level on the Fibonacci extension.

• Pi Coin remains under pressure after losing over 90% from its peak.
• Migration delays and locked balances continue to hurt user confidence.
• Traders are watching the resistance at $0.18 and the support at $0.15 support closely.

Pi Coin is marking a difficult anniversary as selling pressure continues to weigh on the price.

The past year has been one of big promises, uneven delivery, and fading market confidence.

As the open mainnet clocks its first birthday, many holders are still waiting for clarity.

The token’s price action reflects that uncertainty.

A one-year milestone filled with mixed signals

The first year of the open Pi Network mainnet was supposed to be a turning point for the ecosystem. Instead, it has highlighted how far the project still has to go.

Pi Network has expanded its infrastructure and rolled out several technical upgrades.

These updates were meant to improve stability and prepare the network for broader use. At the same time, millions of users have successfully migrated to the open mainnet.

That progress shows the scale and ambition behind the project. Yet a large group of early participants remains stuck.

Many users report locked balances, incomplete migrations, or stolen coins.

KYC delays and new verification requirements have slowed access for others. This gap between development milestones and user experience has hurt sentiment.

Confidence is hard to rebuild when access to funds feels uncertain. That frustration has quietly spilt into the market.

Pi Coin price performance tells a harsh story

Pi Coin’s market performance over the past year has been unforgiving. After peaking near $3 shortly after trading began, the token has lost most of its value.

Recent data shows the price hovering near $0.17.

That represents a decline of more than 90% from its all-time high of $2.99. Short-term rallies have appeared, but they have not lasted.

Each bounce has been met with renewed selling pressure. Profit-taking has become a recurring theme.

Large token transfers to centralised exchanges suggest that holders are eager to exit on strength. Trading volume, however, remains modest compared to the size of the circulating supply.

This imbalance keeps upward momentum fragile, and the market is clearly struggling to find a strong base.

Pi Network adoption hopes clash with market reality

On paper, the ecosystem continues to grow with new tools, developer initiatives, and venture funding underway.

The idea is to build real use cases beyond speculation.

However, the market is focused on what exists today, not what may come later.

Liquidity remains thin relative to supply, and major exchange listings are still limited, restricting price discovery and keeping many institutional players on the sidelines.

While community optimism remains, it is more cautious than before. Many long-term supporters now want results instead of roadmaps.

Until access issues are resolved at scale, confidence may remain fragile. This tension between vision and execution defines the current phase.

Pi Coin price forecast

From a trading perspective, Pi Coin is sitting at a critical crossroads. The area around $0.18 has acted as a stubborn resistance zone.

Repeated failures to break above it suggest weak buying conviction. A daily close above this level would be the first sign of renewed strength.

Above $0.18, traders will be watching the $0.20 region closely.

That zone previously marked a short-term peak and heavy selling. On the downside, $0.17 is now an important psychological level.

A sustained move below it could expose support near $0.15. If selling accelerates, a deeper pullback toward $0.13 cannot be ruled out.

Momentum indicators remain mixed, leaning slightly bearish. This suggests consolidation or further downside before any meaningful recovery.

• $56.9M have exited Arbitrum, pressuring ARB near key support levels.
• Arbitrum Network activity remains steady despite the token price decline.
• Critical levels to watch are the support around $0.093–$0.095 and the resistance around $0.100–$0.105.

Arbitrum has found itself under renewed pressure after a sharp wave of capital outflows unsettled market confidence.

In the last 24 hours, roughly $56.9 million exited the Arbitrum ecosystem, according to Artemis, raising concerns about whether the recent attempt at a price rebound can survive.

Arbitrum capital outflow against ARB’s price decline

The outflow comes at a time when ARB was already trading near historical lows, leaving little room for error.

The token is hovering around the $0.096 region, a level that now carries heavy psychological weight for traders and long-term holders alike.

Despite the sell pressure, Arbitrum’s broader network activity has not collapsed.

According to data from Artemis, daily transactions and active addresses have shown resilience, suggesting that users are still interacting with the chain even as capital flows out.

This disconnect between network usage and token price has become one of the most talked-about themes around ARB.

It reflects a market where sentiment and liquidity matter more in the short term than raw on-chain activity.

The outflows appear to be driven more by capital rotation than by a fundamental rejection of Arbitrum itself.

A portion of the existing funds moved back into Ethereum, while some flowed into newer or more speculative ecosystems.

This behaviour signals caution rather than panic, as traders look for short-term safety or higher volatility elsewhere.

Still, the impact on ARB’s price has been hard to ignore.

Over the past month, the token has lost nearly half of its value, underperforming many comparable assets.

The decline has also been accompanied by weakening market sentiment, with bullish conviction fading quickly.

Derivatives data adds another layer of concern.

Funding rates have slipped into negative territory, showing that short positions are gaining dominance.

When combined with heavy outflows, this setup often leads to choppy price action rather than a clean recovery.

At the same time, selling pressure appears to be slowing near the current lows.

ARB recently printed a fresh all-time low around $0.093, only to bounce modestly afterwards, suggesting that buyers are willing to defend this zone, at least for now.

However, confidence remains fragile.

Any further surge in capital exiting the network could push ARB back toward that low with little resistance in between.

On the other hand, if outflows ease and market conditions stabilise, ARB could attempt to build a short-term base.

Such a base would not guarantee a strong rally, but it could reduce downside risk.

ARN price prediction

For now, Arbitrum (ARB) sits at a crossroads between stabilisation and continuation of its broader downtrend.

Much will depend on whether sentiment improves or deteriorates further in the coming days.

From a technical perspective, the $0.093 to $0.095 zone stands out as the most critical support area.

A clear daily close below this range would expose ARB to deeper losses, with little historical structure to slow the fall.

On the upside, the $0.100 to $0.105 region acts as the first meaningful resistance.

This area aligns with prior breakdown levels and could attract selling from traders looking to exit on relief rallies.

On the upside, a recovery would require ARB to reclaim the $0.12 level, which previously acted as short-term support.

Until that happens, rallies are likely to be viewed as corrective rather than trend-changing.

And while momentum indicators remain weak, early signs of seller exhaustion are starting to appear.

For traders, patience is key, as volatility around these levels can be deceptive.

A sustained hold above $0.10 could improve short-term outlooks, while a breakdown below $0.093 would likely reinforce bearish control.

The Supreme Court’s decision on Friday sharply curtailed the executive branch’s authority to deploy tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In a 6-3 ruling, the justices concluded that the President lacks inherent power to impose broad tariffs under peacetime conditions, signaling a significant check on executive power in U.S. trade policy. The majority’s view was clear: IEEPA does not authorize tariffs at the scale seen in recent years, and the presidential interpretation of the statute extended beyond its legitimate reach. The ruling hinges on historical precedent and the breadth of authority claimed by the administration, suggesting a reevaluation of the tariff policy framework used during peacetime emergencies. The decision was issued on Friday, February 20, 2026, with the court emphasizing the statute’s limited scope.

“In IEEPA’s half-century of existence, no president has invoked the statute to impose any tariffs, let alone tariffs of this magnitude and scope. That ‘lack of historical precedent,’ coupled with the breadth of authority that the President now claims, suggests that the tariffs extend beyond the President’s ‘legitimate reach.’”

At issue was whether tariffs imposed as a means of addressing perceived national emergencies could be sustained under IEEPA. The court’s opinion rejected that premise, noting that the administration had not demonstrated a statutory basis strong enough to justify the breadth and scale of the measures in question. The decision, while narrow in its focus on statutory interpretation, carries broad implications for how future administrations might leverage tariff tools in times of perceived distress. The ruling’s central thrust is that IEEPA does not authorize sweeping tariff regimes, and the absence of a sustained, historically grounded precedent undermines the President’s justification for such measures.

Trump criticizes court, says he’ll get tariffs reinstated

Following the ruling, former President Donald Trump blasted the justices who voted to strike down the tariffs and signaled that the policy would persist through alternative channels. A report noted that he pledged to pursue reinstatement via other avenues, raising questions about what policy instruments could replace tariffs as a means to influence trade dynamics. The courtroom decision, contrasted with Trump’s rhetoric, underscores a broader political debate over how the United States should calibrate its use of trade tools in pursuit of fiscal and industrial goals.

Trump asserted that tariffs were a lever to address perceived imbalances with Canada, China, and Mexico, and he framed the decision as a setback for U.S. economic strategy. Critics argued that tariff policy risks provoking retaliatory actions, disrupting supply chains, and injecting volatility into already fragile macro conditions. The clash between judicial limits and executive ambitions has intensified scrutiny over the federal policy toolkit available to safeguard domestic industries while maintaining competitive leverage on the global stage.

Historically, the tariff discourse has had tangible spillovers across asset markets. In 2025, for example, the prospect or announcement of new tariffs sent shockwaves through equities and cryptocurrencies alike, amplifying uncertainty at a moment when investors were already grappling with a shifting macro backdrop. The prevailing narrative suggested that aggressive tariff posturing tended to compress risk sentiment and tilt asset pricing toward risk-off dynamics, a trend that reverberated across multiple sectors of the market.

As policy discourse continues, observers will watch for how the administration retools its approach. The White House has indicated it may pursue alternate mechanisms to achieve similar objectives, but the legal and economic costs of doing so remain a focal point for lawmakers, market participants, and international partners alike.

Trump claims tariffs could replace income tax, but crypto markets are paying the price

Earlier in the campaign cycle, Trump floated a controversial idea that tariff revenue could be used to replace federal income taxes, a proposition he described as potentially lowering the budget deficit. He argued that tariffs would substantially reduce taxes for many households, a claim that fed into a broader debate about the role of tariffs in fiscal policy. The implications for tax structures, consumer prices, and corporate planning were hotly contested among economists and policymakers, but the idea underscored how tariff revenue could be framed as a substitute for conventional taxation in certain scenarios.

Public disclosures and posts on social platforms reflected a broader narrative that tariff policy could be a transformative fiscal tool. While supporters argued that tariffs might boost domestic production and protect strategic industries, skeptics warned of distortions, higher consumer costs, and diminished global competitiveness. The policy rhetoric matched a volatile market environment where crypto assets, equities, and risk assets had shown sensitivity to tariff-related headlines and policy signals.

In practical terms, the tariff episode left crypto markets exposed to policy-driven risk. When tariffs targeted China in 2025, investors watched liquidity and volatility as leading indicators of how risk assets would respond. In that episode, Bitcoin (BTC) traded with noticeable swings, reflecting the broader interplay between regulatory expectations and appetite for alternative stores of value during periods of uncertainty. The price action mirrored the tension between policy risk, macro fundamentals, and the evolving sentiment around decentralized finance as a potential hedge against traditional financial channels.

Market commentators pointed to a combination of leverage, liquidity constraints, and sentiment factors as drivers of the crypto drawdown observed during tariff episodes. A notable pattern emerged: traders frequently viewed tariff announcements as catalysts for broader risk-off moves, reinforcing the idea that policy shocks can function as macro triggers for price movements across digital assets. In the wake of the latest ruling, traders and investors are parsing how policy space will evolve and what that means for risk parity, hedging strategies, and the resilience of crypto markets to regulatory shocks.

Market context

Market context: The ruling arrives amid a broader phase of regulatory scrutiny and ongoing debate about the role of tariffs in U.S. economic policy, which continues to ripple through crypto markets and risk assets as investors reassess policy risk and liquidity conditions.

Why it matters

The Supreme Court’s decision narrows the executive branch’s tariff toolkit, potentially altering the trajectory of U.S. trade policy in an era of rapid technological change and global supply-chain disruption. For investors, the ruling clarifies what authorities the administration can credibly rely on to shape market dynamics, reducing the likelihood of ad hoc tariff shocks that could surprise markets. For crypto market participants, the episode underscores the sensitivity of digital assets to macro policy developments and the need for resilience in volatile environments. Firms building in this space must consider how shifting tariff and regulatory landscapes could affect cross-border operations, energy pricing, and financial infrastructure decisions. Finally, the ruling adds to the ongoing discourse about the balance between national policy interventions and market-based mechanisms, a debate that will continue to influence capital flows and innovation in the crypto ecosystem.

In the near term, traders will be watching how the administration navigates alternatives to tariffs and whether Congress steps in to provide clearer statutory guardrails. The decision may also spur renewed attention on how the U.S. coordinates with its trading partners to establish a more predictable policy environment, an outcome that could stabilize investor expectations and reduce speculative volatility in volatile assets like cryptocurrencies.

What to watch next

• Clarification on any alternative measures the executive branch may pursue to influence trade, including potential regulatory or administrative actions.
• Legislative responses or bipartisan discussions that could shape the future use of tariffs or trade tools.
• Crypto market reactions to future tariff-related headlines and potential policy shifts, with attention to liquidity and volatility metrics.
• Ongoing court considerations or challenges related to the scope of executive powers in economic policy.
• Further official statements or documentation detailing the scope and limits of IEEPA in modern policy applications.

Sources & verification

• Official Supreme Court ruling: The ruling PDF provides the Court’s reasoning and the formal holding on IEEPA’s authority (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf).
• Politico coverage of Trump’s reaction to the ruling (https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/20/donald-trump-tariff-supreme-court-reaction-00791245?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=dlvr.it).
• Cointelegraph reporting on tariff-related market dynamics and related policy debates (https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump-liberation-day-tariffs-markets-recession).
• Truth Social posts by Donald Trump referenced in coverage (https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114410073592204291 and https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115351840469973590).
• Market analysis linking tariff news to crypto sentiment (https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-traders-us-donald-trump-tariffs-market-decline-santiment).

Key details and implications for markets

Introduction to the core finding: The Supreme Court has curtailed the scope of presidential tariff powers under IEEPA, reinforcing a constitutional check on executive actions in times of economic strain. The ruling, while focused on statutory interpretation, triggers a broader recalibration of policy risk and how market participants price macro surprises. In the immediate aftermath, the president’s reception of the decision and his stated intention to pursue tariffs through other channels raised questions about the timing and nature of any forthcoming policy shifts. Investors will be watching for any formal policy proposals or regulatory steps that could reintroduce tariff pressures, particularly around cross-border trade with major partners.

What to watch next

• Dates for any anticipated policy proposals or regulatory actions outlining alternative tariff mechanisms.
• Potential shifts in congressional discussions that could frame future tariff authority or trade policy instruments.
• Monitoring of crypto market liquidity and volatility around new tariff-related announcements or debates.

Endnotes

Note: The coverage reflects developments reported across multiple outlets, including legal filings, political reporting, and market analysis linked above. The information should be verified against primary documents and official releases as policy positions evolve.