As the CLARITY Act was rejected with 49 votes in favor and 50 votes against, the bill was not advanced. With substantial outflows from spot ETFs, XRP is facing selling pressure and its price continues to decline.

Investors have reduced their investment in higher-risk assets, causing an overall decline. Against the backdrop of a sluggish cryptocurrency market, more and more XRP investors are beginning to explore cloud mining to earn passive income of up to $10,000 per day.

As U.S. Treasury yields rise, investors have reduced their investment in higher-risk assets, leading to an overall decline. The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds once exceeded 5%, significantly “increasing the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets, including most of the cryptocurrency market.”

At the same time, oil prices exceeding $100 per barrel, geopolitical tensions, and expectations of tighter monetary policy have all intensified pressure on risk assets. “Market volatility may remain elevated,” Masabuni pointed out, as the market faces multiple challenges from monetary policy, regulation, and geopolitical risks.

Ryan Kirkley, Co-Founder and CEO of the Global Settlement Network, also pointed out that the Senate’s failure to advance the CLARITY Act immediately put pressure on the cryptocurrency market, with crypto-related stocks such as Coinbase (Nasdaq: $COIN) and Circle (NYSE: $CRCL) facing pressure.

“The reaction from investors precisely demonstrates how much they value regulatory certainty,” Kirkley told Crypto.news, adding that institutional capital needs to know “who regulates what, how assets are classified, what intermediaries can do, and the scope of responsibilities of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). When the answers to these questions remain unresolved, capital must price this uncertainty into the market.”

A new choice for XRP investors: UE Crypto’s path to growing returns

Given this trend, more and more XRP investors are turning their attention to UE Crypto, exploring more stable and sustainable income models through cloud mining and income aggregation mechanisms.

Compared with more volatile futures trading or ETF investments, UE Crypto provides a more straightforward and convenient way to participate in digital assets, helping users improve the efficiency of their digital assets while participating in the development of the XRP ecosystem. For users with a certain amount of capital, this model may offer greater potential for daily returns.

Unlike highly volatile leveraged trading or strategies that rely solely on price appreciation, the Crypto cloud mining platform provides a more convenient way to participate in digital assets. Users do not need to deploy mining machines or maintain hardware; they only need to select a computing-power contract to participate in mining services. This allows them to focus on the long-term prospects of XRP while maximizing the returns of their digital assets.

About UE Crypto

UE Crypto is headquartered in the United Kingdom and operates under European regulatory frameworks such as MiCA and MiFID II, continuously improving its transparency, operational standards, and user protection mechanisms.

The platform adopts a multi-layer security architecture, including:

• Annual financial and security compliance audits conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC);
• Digital asset custody insurance provided by Lloyd’s of London;
• Enterprise-level cybersecurity protection from Cloudflare and McAfee® security systems;
• Bank-level data encryption technology and professional security infrastructure, providing multiple layers of protection for user assets and accounts.

UE Crypto supports a variety of mainstream digital assets, including XRP, BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, DOGE, LTC, and SOL, providing users with a more flexible and convenient digital asset service experience.

How to Join UE Crypto

With just three steps, you can easily start earning daily returns:

1. Register an account

Visit the official UE Crypto website and register using your email address to receive a $20 trial reward.

2. Choose a mining package

According to your personal budget and needs, choose a suitable cloud mining contract and start mining with one click.

3. Start earning

After the contract is activated, the system will automatically allocate computing power, and returns will be automatically settled every 24 hours. Users can withdraw their returns at any time or continue participating according to their needs, achieving long-term compound growth of their assets.

Popular UE Crypto contracts:

BTC (Super Computing System Contract)
Investment Amount: $1,000
Contract Duration: 10 days
Daily Return: $13.10
Total Return at Contract Expiration: $1,000 + $131

LTC (Algorithm-Driven System Contract)
Investment Amount: $5,000
Contract Duration: 25 days
Daily Return: $72
Total Return at Contract Expiration: $5,000 + $1,800

BTC (Quantitative Intelligent System Contract)
Investment Amount: $10,000
Contract Duration: 35 days
Daily Return: $158
Total Return at Contract Expiration: $10,000 + $5,530

For more details about the contract plans, please visit the official UE Crypto website.

Conclusion

UE Crypto was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. It is a globally leading innovative cloud computing platform. We deeply integrate cutting-edge hardware, intelligent core algorithms, and powerful cloud infrastructure to provide global users with high-performance, cost-effective crypto asset solutions. As a pioneer in the fields of cloud computing technology and digital asset services, UE Crypto brings together a team of top experts and adheres to the core values of “green, intelligent, open, and sustainable.” UE Crypto is committed to leading the global blockchain energy revolution. Through innovative cloud computing architecture and decentralized finance (DeFi) technology, we are fully committed to promoting the development of an efficient and low-carbon computing ecosystem. We are reshaping the future of an open and shared digital economy while continuously creating long-term value for global users.

UE Crypto’s cloud mining services provide users with a low-risk alternative for long-term engagement with the digital asset ecosystem, helping investors move away from short-term market noise, focus on the long-term value of their assets, and establish a more resilient and sustainable form of passive income.

For more information, please visit the official UE Crypto website and download the application.

Solana price rose back above $100 after buyers defended the $95–$96 support zone, but technical resistance and concentrated liquidation levels near $102 could determine whether the rebound develops into a wider recovery.

Solana price rebounds from $96 support

Solana (SOL) price traded near $100.50 after recovering from a 24-hour low of $96.23, according to the daily chart. The rebound followed a sharp sell-off linked to the US Senate’s failed procedural vote on the CLARITY Act and the Federal Reserve’s 25-basis-point rate increase.

The daily chart shows that SOL briefly moved below $100 before buyers entered around the $95–$96 area. The recovery carried the price back to the Murrey Math major support and resistance pivot at $100.

Holding that pivot would improve the short-term structure following the decline from the late-August peak near $110. However, the asset has not yet cleared the lower highs formed during September, leaving its broader recovery incomplete.

Crypto analyst Ella identified $95–$96 as the level Solana needed to defend. She said SOL fell to $96.13 around the Fed decision before bouncing to $98.72 and outperforming Bitcoin and Ethereum during the initial recovery.

“Get back above it and yesterday’s damage starts to look repairable,” Ella wrote, referring to the $100 level.

The analyst warned that another loss of $96 could cause the rebound to fade quickly. SOL’s recovery above $100 therefore needs confirmation through sustained closes rather than a brief intraday move.

Momentum improves, but Supertrend remains bearish

The daily Aroon indicator favors buyers after the rebound. Aroon Up stood at 85.71%, compared with an Aroon Down reading of 21.43%. The gap suggests that a recent high carries more weight than the latest low within the indicator’s 14-day lookback period.

SOL must continue holding $100 for that momentum signal to remain constructive. The next daily resistance appears at $106.25, marked as the top of the current Murrey Math trading range.

A daily close above $106.25 would strengthen the case for a return toward $110 and the next major pivot at $112.50. Higher resistance sits at $118.75 and $125, although SOL would first need to break its September sequence of lower highs.

The 4-hour chart remains less supportive. SOL traded below the Supertrend level of approximately $102.80, keeping the indicator’s short-term signal bearish. Price must reclaim that level before buyers can argue that the latest correction has ended.

The Awesome Oscillator also remained slightly below zero at about -0.76. Its negative bars were contracting, however, suggesting that bearish momentum was losing strength as SOL recovered from $96.

A move above the zero line would confirm improving 4-hour momentum. Failure to do so could leave the latest advance vulnerable to another rejection between $101 and $103.

SOL liquidation map puts $102 in focus

The three-day CoinGlass liquidation heatmap shows a dense concentration of leveraged positions immediately above the current price. The brightest nearby bands sit around $101.30 and $101.80–$102, making that zone a potential target during an upward move.

A push into those levels could liquidate short positions and help SOL test the 4-hour Supertrend resistance at $102.80. Additional liquidity appears around $105 and $105.70, close to the upper end of the $101–$106 resistance region visible on the price charts.

Liquidity also remains below the market. The clearest downside concentrations appear near $99, $96, and $95.50. Losing $99 could therefore pull the price back toward the defended $95–$96 zone as leveraged long positions come under pressure.

The heatmap does not establish price direction on its own. It instead identifies areas where forced position closures could add speed to an existing move. With sizable liquidity on both sides, a break from the $96–$103 range may produce a sharper move than the recent consolidation suggests.

Solana bulls face resistance between $102 and $106

The immediate bullish case depends on SOL holding the $100 pivot and breaking $102.80. Clearing the 4-hour Supertrend could open a move toward $105 and the daily resistance at $106.25.

Rand Group said Solana continued to defend horizontal support while pressing against a local downtrend. Its shared chart showed the asset compressing beneath descending resistance after recovering from its midyear lows, a structure the firm described as a possible breakout setup.

S&P Global has agreed to acquire OpenZeppelin, the blockchain security firm known for its open-source smart contract tooling and professional security reviews. The move is designed to strengthen S&P Global’s digital asset capabilities—particularly around risk assessment and onchain technology analysis—at a time when financial institutions are increasingly looking to tokenized markets.

The acquisition was announced on Thursday in a press release by S&P Global. Financial terms were not disclosed, and the transaction remains subject to customary closing conditions.

Key takeaways

• S&P Global’s planned purchase of OpenZeppelin targets expanded onchain smart contract and technology risk assessment capabilities.
• OpenZeppelin’s open-source contracts library is expected to remain free and publicly maintained on GitHub after the deal.
• The transaction is structured so OpenZeppelin will operate as a separate S&P Global business unit.
• Deal completion depends on closing conditions; investors should watch for regulatory and transaction approvals.

Why S&P Global wants OpenZeppelin

In its announcement, S&P Global framed the acquisition as a complement to its existing efforts in risk assessment and ecosystem development for the digital asset market. The company said the goal is to bring “trusted data, benchmarks and transparent risk assessment” to markets as activity moves onchain.

Yann Le Pallec, S&P Global’s ratings president, said the acquisition will help expand the firm’s smart contract and onchain technology risk assessment capabilities. For S&P Global, this is a strategic fit: ratings and risk frameworks typically rely on standardized methodologies, while OpenZeppelin’s offerings center on security evaluation for smart contracts and related blockchain systems.

That matters for investors and market participants because, in tokenized environments, security failures can quickly translate into financial losses. As more traditional finance workflows connect to smart contract infrastructure, the demand for repeatable, auditable security assessments is likely to grow.

What OpenZeppelin brings to the table

OpenZeppelin, founded in 2015, develops open-source smart contract software and conducts security assessments for both blockchain projects and financial institutions, according to the deal announcement. The company also highlighted its track record: its smart contracts have supported more than $37 trillion in value transferred, and it has completed over 900 security engagements.

Those numbers point to scale and adoption, but they also underscore a key differentiator in this space—OpenZeppelin is not only a services provider; it also maintains widely used reusable contract components. That dual model (public tooling plus professional security work) is often valuable to enterprises because it can reduce the friction between building securely and validating security expectations.

How the acquisition is structured

OpenZeppelin said its contracts library and other open-source applications will remain free and publicly maintained on GitHub. The announcement also states that the platform will be operated as a separate S&P Global business unit, with Demian Brener continuing as CEO and reporting to Le Pallec.

Operational independence can be important for maintaining trust in security tooling, especially where developers and institutions rely on consistent standards over time. By stating that its open-source artifacts will remain publicly maintained, OpenZeppelin also aimed to reassure builders that the acquisition is not intended to lock critical components behind proprietary access.

Part of a broader push into tokenized markets

This agreement comes shortly after S&P Global pursued additional exposure to crypto market infrastructure. Earlier this week, S&P Global led a strategic investment in Kaiko, the Paris-based crypto market data provider, extending Kaiko’s Series B funding to $110 million as it expands data infrastructure for tokenized financial markets—coverage of that round was reported by Cointelegraph in a separate piece.

Read together, the S&P Global–OpenZeppelin deal and the Kaiko investment suggest a broader strategy: pairing market data and benchmarks with stronger onchain security and risk assessment. For institutional participants trying to operationalize tokenized assets, this combination can be critical—data helps monitor markets, while security assessment helps address the risks embedded in smart contract systems.

Still, the timeline for any tangible impact will depend on deal closing. Until the acquisition completes, readers should treat the operational outcomes—such as integration plans and any changes to service delivery—as uncertain.

With S&P Global and OpenZeppelin now linked under a pending transaction, the next thing to watch is whether closing conditions are met promptly and how the new business unit evolves—especially in how it applies OpenZeppelin’s security expertise to S&P Global’s benchmarks and risk frameworks across tokenized markets.

Attackers claiming responsibility for Revolut’s data breach say they want $3 million in Monero from the banking firm, or they’ll sell the stolen customer data to other criminals.

That’s according to the Financial Times, which reports that the group, going by the name “iamnotavillain,” is making its demands for the first time. 

Its ransom website was launched this week, but negotiations haven’t yet begun with Revolut.

Reuters also reports that Revolut has had no contact with, or received any demands from, the attackers. 

There are now 179 listed companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets, all following variations of the same simple formula:

Raise capital on traditional markets, buy Bitcoin and attempt to increase the amount of BTC that backs each share faster than the company dilutes shareholders.

According to Mark Palmer, managing director and senior equity research analyst at StoneX, that’s how treasury companies attempt to “beat” Bitcoin’s returns.

Making that equation work is a lot easier when the price of Bitcoin is going up and investors are happy to fund the next spree of purchases. Unfortunately, the mechanics work in both directions.

When the premium evaporates, investor enthusiasm wanes. Financing gets harder, debt and yield obligations remain, and the same structure that outperformed the asset magnifies the losses on the way down. No surprise that the 50 largest Bitcoin treasury companies bled $83 billion in market value since July 2025.

Metaplanet’s recent shareholder backlash shows the sort of questions that arise when treasury companies dilute their shareholders too much.

Treasury companies are more likely to need to raise money in bear markets, but this creates a potential problem. Palmer says:

“Issuing shares at a premium to net asset value and buying Bitcoin with the proceeds increases the Bitcoin backing every existing share. The same issuance at a discount destroys value.”

So are the outsize returns on offer during the bull market, worth it for the downside risks during the bear?

The math works, until the capital markets stop cooperating

For all the complexity around Bitcoin treasury companies, the basic test for potential investors is relatively simple. Do shareholders end up with more Bitcoin backing each share over time?

Palmer says investors should look past the headline number of Bitcoin a company holds and focus instead on “Bitcoin per fully diluted share, net of debt and preferred stock claims.”

179 Bitcoin treasury companies as of September 2026. Source: SatsIntel

Issuing new shares is not necessarily a problem. What matters, is whether the new capital generates enough additional value and profit that the benefits to existing shareholders outweigh the dilution.

Related: Metaplanet moves 4,800 BTC worth $377M to Coinbase Prime

If the company issues shares for more than the value of the Bitcoin that backs them, and uses that money to buy more Bitcoin, shareholders can end up with more Bitcoin per share. If it raises money below that value, they can end up with less.

That dynamic was very favorable for Strategy during the last Bitcoin bull market, McCarthy says, because Bitcoin was increasing fast. “They were able to take on new debt. They were able to issue new debt because of that.”

The first blow is half the battle

Choosing the right digital asset treasury is a key decision. With a couple of hundred now on offer, longer established companies have the advantage, explains McCarthy:

“It’s a first-mover advantage, right? Like if you’re Michael Saylor or you’re Bitmine and you’ve got this sort of larger-than-life character at the top, it’s a bit different.”

Strategy’s executive chairman Michael Saylor has become part of the machinery of the trade itself, and McCarthy says he can keep the story moving even when Bitcoin’s price isn’t. Ethereum treasury company Bitmine has a similarly prominent figure in Tom Lee.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies rise and fall on narratives, so having a storyteller out front helps keep investors interested — especially when the underlying asset is in freefall. But McCarthy warns:

“I don’t think there’s enough room for a hundred Michael Saylors; there’s not enough people like that around.”

Related: Strategy raises $334M through stock sales but buys no Bitcoin

McCarthy says many of the companies that followed Strategy were essentially just buying Bitcoin and hoping the stock price would follow. They “didn’t have an exit plan” for when the dynamics reversed, he says, and he expects the shakeout to be even more brutal still:

“I think it’s going to flush out like 95% of it.”

The corporate wrapper comes with baggage

There are also simpler ways to get exposure to Bitcoin by just buying it directly on an exchange, or via a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Spot ETFs let TradFi investors buy Bitcoin through a conventional brokerage account, without having to consider a DAT’s company’s management, financing structure, or governance risks.

Creative financial engineering can be difficult for retail investors to understand, says Palmer:

“The biggest risk that investors face in buying Bitcoin treasury company stocks is forgetting that common shareholders’ claim is a residual one, as convertible debt and perpetual preferred stock sit ahead of them in terms of priority.”

Those instruments, he adds, “carry cash obligations that Bitcoin itself doesn’t generate.”

So, can treasury companies beat Bitcoin?

Matt Cole, chief executive of Strive, one of the largest Bitcoin treasury companies, says investors should just look at the scoreboard:

“Strategy has dramatically outperformed Bitcoin since adopting its strategy. Metaplanet has also outperformed Bitcoin since inception and Strive has outperformed Bitcoin both since announcing our strategy in May 2025 and year-to-date in 2026.”

He adds that, “Strive has not sold a single Bitcoin, and during a Bitcoin bear market we have increased our holdings approximately fourfold while outperforming Bitcoin.”

David Bailey, chief executive of Nakamoto, makes a similar case for Metaplanet, saying it was “the best performing equity in the world for nearly two years” and is “up 1,300% from genesis.”

David Bailey says Metaplanet best performing equity for 2 years. Source: David Bailey.

Despite the returns to date, debt maturity and yield obligations may still cause problems down the line. And some companies without the same access to capital, investor following or balance sheet firepower have found out how quickly the trade can work against them. The two most notable examples are Bailey’s own Nakamoto Inc, whose stock fell 99% from its 2025 peak and the UK company Satsuma Technology, which saw a similar decline.

McCarthy’s own view is telling. When asked how he would deploy $100,000 for Bitcoin exposure, he says he would “mostly buy an ETF” and might put a smaller amount into Strategy “for the vol.”

At the end of the day, buying Bitcoin is a bet on Bitcoin. Buying a treasury company is a bet on Bitcoin plus an additional bet on the people, financing structure, balance sheet and corporate governance wrapped around it.

Magazine: Strategy became a symbol of the dot-com crash: Could history repeat?

S&P Global (SPGI) said Thursday it has agreed to buy OpenZeppelin, a smart-contract security firm whose open-source code library is used across much of the stablecoin and tokenized-fund market. S&P said contracts built with the library have moved more than $37 trillion over time. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The deal gives S&P Global access to a part of onchain finance that conventional ratings do not cover: the code that issues, moves and manages stablecoins, tokenized funds and DeFi products. A project can have sound reserves or a strong credit profile but still fail because of a flaw in its smart contracts. S&P is betting banks and asset managers will need common ways to assess that technology risk before they use onchain products at scale.

The $37 trillion figure is a measure of value transferred through contracts using OpenZeppelin’s library over time, not assets the company manages or holds.

“The transaction complements S&P Global’s risk assessment and ecosystem development capabilities in digital asset markets, enhancing its ability to create the next generation of onchain security assessments, benchmarks, and deliver essential intelligence as capital markets transition onchain,” the firm said.

BNB price traded near $721 on Sep. 17 after buyers defended the $709–$710 area, but weakening daily momentum and dense liquidity above $739 leave the token without a clear breakout signal.

BNB price consolidates above $710

BNB (BNB) price was trading at approximately $721 at the time of writing, down 0.63% during the daily session. The token opened near $725.92, reached $729.22, and fell as low as $720.89 on the daily candle.

The wider chart shows that BNB remains in a consolidation phase following its early-September rally. The token climbed from below $700 to nearly $780 before sellers pushed it back toward the $710 region.

Price has since formed a tighter range between roughly $710 and $730. Repeated defenses of the lower boundary show that buyers remain active around $700–$710, but the lack of a sustained move above $730 suggests demand has not yet regained full control.

BNB’s broader structure still includes higher lows from the July bottom near $550. However, the decline from the September high has interrupted the previous bullish momentum and left the token searching for a new short-term direction.

The pullback came against a weaker risk backdrop following the failed procedural vote on the US CLARITY Act and the Federal Reserve’s 25-basis-point rate increase. Higher US interest rates can reduce demand for risk assets by lifting returns on cash and government debt.

4-hour indicators point to a neutral setup

The 4-hour Bollinger Bands show BNB trading just above the middle band at $719.39. The upper band stands at $729.15, while the lower band sits at $709.63.

Price near the middle band reflects consolidation rather than a strong directional trend. The narrowing distance between the bands also points to falling volatility after the sharp swings seen earlier in September.

A 4-hour close above $729.15 would push BNB beyond the upper Bollinger Band and could signal renewed upside momentum. Buyers would then need to clear the $737–$740 area to establish a stronger breakout.

The lower band reinforces $709–$710 as immediate support. A decisive close beneath it would show that the current range has broken down and could expose the psychological $700 level.

BNB’s 4-hour relative strength index stood at 50.84, above its moving average of 46.26. The reading places momentum near the center of its range, with neither buyers nor sellers holding a major advantage.

The RSI’s recovery above 50 offers a modest positive signal, but it has not reached the 60–70 area normally associated with stronger bullish momentum. Price therefore needs confirmation from a resistance breakout before the indicator can support a wider recovery scenario.

Daily MACD warns of fading bullish momentum

BNB’s daily chart presents a weaker momentum picture. The moving average convergence divergence line stood at 15.14, below the signal line at 20.18, while the histogram had fallen to -5.04.

The bearish crossover shows that momentum from the late-August rally is fading. The MACD remains above the zero line, meaning the broader recovery has not fully reversed, but the negative histogram signals increasing short-term selling pressure.

Aroon readings also show limited directional strength. The indicator’s two lines had fallen to 14.29% and 0%, suggesting that neither a fresh high nor a fresh low has recently established a dominant trend.

Low Aroon readings often appear during consolidation. In BNB’s case, they support the range-bound structure visible since the price retreated from nearly $780.

For a bullish reversal, the MACD line would need to flatten and move back above the signal line. A stronger Aroon Up reading would provide further confirmation if BNB begins setting fresh short-term highs.

Liquidation heatmap places $740 in focus

The 24-hour liquidation heatmap shows concentrated leverage on both sides of BNB’s current price. The nearest lower liquidity cluster appears around $709–$712, close to the 4-hour lower Bollinger Band.

Larger pockets are also visible near $703–$705 and $695–$698. If BNB loses $709, leveraged long positions around those levels could increase downside volatility and pull the price toward $700.

Above the market, liquidity is concentrated around $727–$730, followed by a brighter and denser cluster near $739–$741. The latter area matches the resistance zone identified by the price charts.

A move through $730 could therefore draw BNB toward $740 as short positions are closed. However, the large concentration at that level may also create resistance if spot demand does not support the derivatives-driven move.

Additional liquidity appears near $747–$755, giving bulls a secondary target if BNB establishes support above $740.

BNB faces breakout test between $710 and $740

BNB’s short-term outlook depends on which side of the current range gives way first. Holding $709–$710 would preserve the consolidation and allow another attempt at $729.

A 4-hour close above $729, followed by a sustained move through $740, would strengthen the bullish case. The next targets would sit near $750 and the September peak around $775–$780.

The bearish case would gain weight if BNB closes below $709. Such a move would break the lower Bollinger Band and could trigger liquidations toward $703, $700, and $695. A loss of $695 would weaken the broader recovery structure and place the late-August breakout area near $680 back in view.

For US investors, the Federal Reserve’s rate path and any further action on crypto market-structure legislation remain potential sources of volatility. Technically, however, $710 support and $740 resistance provide the clearest boundaries for BNB’s next directional move.