Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Geopolitical Tensions With Iran Leave Bitcoin Hovering Near $69.5K

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin slipped below the $70,000 mark as macro risk assets came under pressure amid renewed Middle East tensions, renewing questions about BTC’s sensitivity to broader markets. The September session saw BTC pull back after a brief sprint to around $71,800 earlier in the week, with traders watching how the next move would unfold in an environment where oil, equities, and geopolitical risk remain intertwined.

Analysts described the scene as a palpable test for Bitcoin’s resilience in a risk-off backdrop, with some arguing that a potential regime shift—where BTC behaves less like traditional risk assets—could be forming, even as others warn that volatility and downside risk persist until macro momentum cools.

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin briefly fell through the $70,000 level as macro selling pressure hit risk assets, with intraday moves signaling continued volatility.
  • Oil hovered near $95 per barrel, and U.S. stock indices opened lower as tensions in the Middle East and related supply concerns weighed on sentiment.
  • Market color from QCP Capital framed the price action as a balancing act by policymakers, suggesting authorities are aiming to maintain stability even as geopolitical risks linger.
  • Some observers saw early signs of a Bitcoin regime shift, with higher-lows patterns suggesting emerging strength that could challenge traditional risk asset correlations if sustained.
  • Technical readings pointed to a contested footing around the 200-week average, with the metric around $68,300 acting as a ambiguous boundary and keeping the near-term outlook nuanced.

Macro backdrop and price dynamics

As U.S. markets opened, BTC traded on the back foot, losing roughly 1.5% on the day and retreating from an early-week push toward the $72,000 area. In traditional markets, the Nasdaq Composite slipped, while gold struggled to push decisively past $4,450. Oil’s oscillation—tending toward $95 per barrel after an initial retreat—reflected ongoing concerns about energy flow. The broader geopolitical backdrop, including tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and regional developments, kept risk sentiment on edge and complicated the path for a clear risk-on/risk-off regime for crypto assets.

Analysts pointed to the interplay between oil prices, sanctions headlines, and macro liquidity as a frequent driver of short-term Bitcoin moves. In such a climate, a single headline can shift correlations as traders reassess leverage, hedging needs, and the role of BTC within diversified portfolios.

Resilience, regime shift, and what it could mean for BTC

Market observers have debated whether Bitcoin’s current action signals a broader shift in how it behaves relative to traditional risk assets. QCP Capital, in its Market Color briefing, argued that President Trump’s handling of geopolitical risk and market stability creates a difficult balancing act: equities sit near key support, inflation pressures continue to influence expectations for rate hikes, and policymakers cannot afford to spur additional volatility. In this view, BTC’s relative steadiness in the face of rising tensions could reflect structural factors such as lower systemic leverage or, more intriguingly, the early stages of a regime shift where BTC does not track risk assets in the same way as before.

Advertisement

Indeed, several traders highlighted constructive technical signs, even as the overall backdrop remains fragile. Michaël van de Poppe pointed to a pattern of higher lows forming since the February crash, suggesting increasing strength if support holds. He cautioned, however, that the picture isn’t “out of the woods” yet, noting that higher lows can still trigger liquidity waves if markets move toward those levels. For a potential bullish runway, he pointed to a target in the high range around $77,000 to $80,000 if Bitcoin sustains the current support area.

On the other side of the spectrum, some analysts warned that weakness could reemerge. A well-known trader warned about a possible Bart Simpson-style pattern playing out on lower timeframes, underscoring the risk that a relief rally could falter without broader macro improvement. Such viewpoints reflect the ongoing tug-of-war between short-term momentum and longer-term structural factors shaping BTC’s trajectory.

Technical reading and near-term implications

The technical picture remains nuanced. The 200-week exponential moving average (EMA), around $68,300, has not delivered a definitive answer on support or resistance, allowing for continued choppiness in the near term. Some market participants suggest that BTC could trade within a broader range until macro catalysts clarify the directional bias, while others argue that strength in the form of higher-lows could precede a renewed upside leg if key levels hold through resistance tests.

In this environment, near-term risk management becomes paramount. Traders are watching whether Bitcoin can maintain the recent higher-lows trajectory, how it behaves around the critical $70,000 level, and how external factors such as oil prices and geopolitical headlines influence liquidity and collateral dynamics in the crypto market.

Advertisement

What readers should watch next

jolts in macro sentiment, particularly around Middle East developments and oil supply expectations, will be crucial in shaping Bitcoin’s path over the coming sessions. A sustained hold above the $70,000 threshold, coupled with a clear push beyond the mid-$70,000s, could renew optimism for the next leg higher. Conversely, renewed downside pressure—especially if macro risk appetite deteriorates—could see BTC retest lower supports in the near term.

Market participants will also be parsing the evolving relationship between Bitcoin and traditional risk assets, as crypto traders increasingly weigh whether a regime shift is underway or if current moves are simply a pause within a longer, volatile cycle.

This article synthesizes market observations and analysis from the period, reflecting published commentary and price action without asserting new claims beyond the cited material.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Why Bernstein thinks Bitcoin’s 40% drawdown is just a confidence wobble

Published

on

Bitcoin’s Lightning Network clears record $1M transfer to Kraken

Summary

  • Research firm Bernstein says Bitcoin has likely found a cycle bottom and is reiterated its $150,000 year-end price target, describing the current drawdown as the “weakest bear case” in the asset’s history.
  • BTC is trading around $70,668, roughly 40% below its all-time high, but Bernstein argues the correction reflects a temporary confidence crisis rather than any structural breakdown.
  • Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) — which holds approximately 3.6% of Bitcoin’s total supply, worth around $53.5 billion — has continued buying at recent lows, raising $7.3 billion in 2026 alone to expand its holdings.

Research and brokerage firm Bernstein, which manages approximately $867 billion in assets, declared on March 24 that Bitcoin’s (BTC) price bottom is likely in and maintained its end-of-2026 price target of $150,000 — implying more than a 100% gain from current levels — as the firm’s analysts argued the ongoing selloff is categorically different from every bear market Bitcoin has previously endured.

Lead analyst Gautam Chhugani described the current pullback as “the weakest Bitcoin bear case in its history,” pointing to what the firm sees as a temporary crisis of investor confidence rather than any deterioration in Bitcoin’s underlying fundamentals. With BTC trading around $70,668 at time of writing — down roughly 40% from its peak — Bernstein’s conviction remains intact.

Advertisement

A Different Kind of Drawdown

The framing is a deliberate break from how past bear markets have been characterized. Previous Bitcoin cycles saw far more violent collapses: the 2013 peak near $1,150 was followed by an 84% drawdown, the 2017 high of $20,000 preceded a 77% decline, and the 2021 peak near $69,000 gave way to a roughly 70% correction. By comparison, the current drawdown of around 40% looks restrained — and Bernstein argues it is, structurally speaking, far less dangerous.

The key differentiators, according to the firm, are the maturation of institutional flows and a more favorable policy environment. Spot Bitcoin ETF adoption continues to expand, corporate treasury participation is accelerating, and the U.S. political backdrop has shifted in a direction broadly viewed as supportive of digital assets. None of the systemic failures that defined 2022 — collapsed exchanges, insolvent lenders, contagion — are present in the current cycle.

Strategy and On-Chain Signals

Strategy’s continued accumulation at depressed prices is cited as a key supporting data point. The company now holds approximately 3.6% of Bitcoin’s total circulating supply, valued at around $53.5 billion, and has raised $7.3 billion in 2026 specifically to expand its Bitcoin treasury. Bernstein views Strategy as a high-beta vehicle with a structurally resilient balance sheet, noting that only an extreme scenario — BTC falling to $8,000 and remaining there for five years — would require any balance sheet restructuring.

On-chain data adds further context. Analyst Ali Charts pointed to Bitcoin approaching the 0.8 MVRV ratio band, a level situated between $56,000 and $60,000 that has historically served as a launchpad for major rallies: +963% in 2017, +261% in 2018, +1,126% in 2020, and +660% following the FTX collapse in 2022. CryptoQuant analyst Crypto Dan echoed the sentiment, arguing that reduced participation and fading retail interest are “textbook bear market” indicators — but historically, accumulation phases rather than exit points. “A bear market is not a time to give up. It is the time to prepare for the next bull cycle,” he wrote on X.

Advertisement

Where Analysts Diverge

Not everyone shares Bernstein’s confidence. VanEck CEO Jan VanEck told CNBC in early March that while a bottom may be forming, 2026 represents Bitcoin’s typical fourth-year bear cycle, consistent with historical halving patterns. Some traders argue that failure to reclaim and hold above $70,000 could open the door to a deeper leg lower, potentially retesting the $60,000 level that has emerged as the most closely watched structural support.

Bernstein’s $150,000 target, first established when Bitcoin was trading at significantly higher levels, aligns with a broader cluster of institutional 2026 price forecasts that include $150,000 from BSTR President Katherine Dowling and $180,000 from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. Longer term, Bernstein maintains a target of $1 million by 2033.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tether Engages Big Four Firm for First Full Audit

Published

on

Tether Engages Big Four Firm for First Full Audit

The issuer of the largest stablecoin by market cap has been under scrutiny for years for not conducting a full financial audit

Tether announced on Tuesday that it has engaged a Big Four accounting firm to conduct what the firm says is its “first full independent financial statement audit.” The issuer of USDT, the largest stablecoin by market cap with over $184 billion, did not name which specific firm would conduct the audit, and described it as potentially the largest inaugural audit in financial markets history.

The company, which reports a global user base of more than 550 million, said the engagement follows a competitive onboarding process during which multiple audit firms assessed Tether’s systems, internal controls, and financial reporting.

The move comes after years of criticism over Tether’s transparency practices. Rather than full audits, Tether has historically provided quarterly attestations from BDO Italia — a more limited form of financial review. In 2021, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a $41 million fine over misleading claims that USDT was fully backed by U.S. dollars.

Advertisement

No timeline for completion of the audit was disclosed in today’s announcement.

As The Defiant reported in 2023, then-CTO Paolo Ardoino — now CEO — attributed the lack of a full audit in part to difficulties with auditing firms themselves.

More recently, both the EU’s MiCA framework for digital asset regulation and the U.S. stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act have included provisions calling for full reserve backing and transparent audits of stablecoin issuers, as The Defiant reported previously. In November, S&P Global downgraded USDT’s dollar-peg stability score to its lowest mark, citing growing exposure to higher-risk assets.

Tether credited the appointment of CFO Simon McWilliams in early 2025 as key to preparing the company’s internal architecture for a full audit, per today’s announcement. McWilliams said the firm was “selected through a competitive process because the organisation is already operating at Big Four audit standard.”

Advertisement

The announcement comes alongside Tether’s broader push into the U.S. market. Last August, the company hired Bo Hines, former executive director of the White House Crypto Council, as a strategic advisor overseeing its U.S. expansion. More recently, Tether invested $200 million in commerce platform Whop, building on the launch of its regulated U.S. stablecoin USAT, which it first unveiled in September.

This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Treasury Spike, Inflation Risk, Iran War Contagion Pin Bitcoin Price

Published

on

Treasury Spike, Inflation Risk, Iran War Contagion Pin Bitcoin Price

Key takeaways:

  • Investors dumped gold and bonds for cash as war-driven oil spikes and inflation forced a defensive market stance.

  • Rising yields and a 20% rate hike chance signal a tight outlook, leaving Bitcoin vulnerable amid soaring US debt.

Bitcoin (BTC) retested the $67,500 support level on Monday, a move that coincided with gold prices suffering their sharpest correction in over 50 years. Fears of a prolonged war in Iran and the inflationary impact of oil prices holding above $85 pushed investors to cut risk.

US 5-year Treasury yields (left) vs. Gold/USD (right). Source: TradingView

US Treasuries also faced a sell-off during this period, suggesting that traders aggressively built cash positions. Yields on the US 5-year Treasury jumped to 4.10%, marking a nine-month high as traders demanded better returns. With the S&P 500 hitting its lowest point in over six months on Monday, evidence suggested a broad rush to liquidity.

Cash is king amid economic uncertainty, while Bitcoin risks further downside

Investors appeared to be raising cash either to cover recent losses or to brace for further price drops across risk markets.

Bitcoin/USD (left) vs. S&P 500 futures (right). Source: TradingView

The ongoing war in Iran pushed oil prices past $90, creating inflationary pressure. The Wall Street Journal reported that the US planned to deploy roughly 3,000 troops to the Middle East to counter Iran’s influence over the Strait of Hormuz. Part of the decline in gold prices was likely linked to fading expectations for US monetary policy easing in the near term.

Interest rate target probabilities for the July FOMC meeting. Source: CME FedWatch Tool

Bond market futures showed that the implied probability of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) hiking interest rates by July surged to 20.5%, up from 0% just one week prior. Investors anticipated a cooling job market as high interest rates continued to reduce corporate expansion incentives.

Tech stocks fall, inflation hurts consumers

US legislators debated an additional $200 billion in funding to support the war in Iran, according to The Washington Post. Kevin Hassett, director of the US National Economic Council, stated that $12 billion had already been spent. Lawmakers did not authorize the war, and Congress showed growing unease with the military strategy, according to AP.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the US national debt soared past $39 trillion, which further pushed consumers toward a cost-of-living crisis. Fear of excessive speculative investment in the artificial intelligence sector emerged after Reuters reported that ChatGPT maker OpenAI offered private-equity firms a guaranteed minimum return of 17.5% while the company remained largely unprofitable.

Tech stocks performance. Source: TradingView

Some of the world’s largest tech companies faced losses of 10% or more over the past six weeks, including Google (GOOG US), Meta (META US), and IBM (IBM US). Thus, regardless of the sharp correction in gold prices, traders increasingly feared recession risks or a surge in inflation above the 4% fixed income returns.

Related: Bitcoin holders shift from panic to cash-buffer discipline as volatility deepens

The combination of declining stock prices and persistent inflationary pressure explained why investors aggressively sought the safety of cash positions.

Regardless of favorable Bitcoin onchain metrics, broader macroeconomic conditions remained unfavorable for sustainable bullish momentum. The decline in gold prices while investors offloaded US Treasuries served as a sign of risk aversion. The odds of a $66,000 retest remain a serious threat, at least until inflation and war expenses hold US monetary policy tight for a longer period.

Advertisement