Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

How Expert Hyper Casual Game Developers Build Profitable Products

Published

on

Enterprise Ai Growth

Hyper casual games look simple on the surface, but building profitable titles requires far more than a basic gameplay idea. A number of projects fail not because the concept is weak, but because the development process lacks structured testing, proper monetization planning, and scalability considerations.

Professional hyper casual game developers approach development differently. Instead of focusing only on building a playable game, they design systems that maximize retention, optimize monetization, and allow rapid iteration. This structured approach is what separates profitable titles from the thousands of hyper casual games that disappear shortly after launch.

Understanding the basics behind successful hyper casual games plays a pivotal role in helping how successful studios operate helps decision-makers evaluate whether their project is being built for long-term revenue or short-term experimentation.

Why Most Hyper Casual Games Fail Financially

Hyper casual games have one of the lowest barriers to entry in the gaming industry. Small teams can build simple prototypes quickly, which has led to a flood of titles entering the market. However, simplicity in gameplay does not mean simplicity in business success.

Advertisement

Most failed hyper casual projects share similar characteristics. They are often developed around a single idea without validation through testing cycles. Developers may launch a game assuming that downloads will automatically translate into revenue, but without retention and monetization optimization, even large user acquisition numbers fail to produce sustainable income.

Another common issue is the absence of structured monetization planning. Advertising is the primary revenue source for hyper casual games, yet poorly implemented ad placements can drive players away before revenue is generated. Balancing engagement with monetization requires careful data-driven tuning.

Infrastructure planning is also frequently underestimated. Games that unexpectedly gain traction may struggle with analytics integration, event tracking, or backend services required for optimization. Without proper tracking, developers cannot identify what drives retention or revenue.

These challenges explain why the majority of hyper casual games never recover their development investment. Profitability is rarely accidental; it is engineered through disciplined development practices.

Advertisement

What Professional Hyper Casual Game Developers Do Differently

Experienced hyper casual game developers follow structured workflows designed specifically for rapid validation and monetization optimization. Their goal is not simply to launch games, but to identify concepts that can scale profitably.

Professional teams start by analyzing market trends and player behavior before development begins. Instead of building fully featured games immediately, they create small prototypes designed to test core gameplay loops. These early prototypes help determine whether players respond positively to the concept before additional investment is made.

Professional developers typically focus on:

  • Market-driven concept validation instead of idea-first development
  • Rapid prototyping cycles to reduce investment risk
  • Early analytics integration to measure retention and engagement
  • Iterative gameplay tuning based on real user data
  • Monetization planning before launch

Another key difference lies in data-driven decision-making. Professional studios integrate analytics systems early in the development process so that retention metrics, session length, and monetization behavior can be tracked from the first test release.

A professional hyper casual game development company approaches development as a cycle of testing and refinement rather than a single build-and-launch process. This methodology significantly increases the probability of building profitable titles.

The Real Hyper Casual Game Development Process

The hyper casual game development process is built around speed, validation, and continuous optimization rather than long development cycles. While hyper casual games appear simple, profitable titles are created through structured development stages designed to reduce risk and improve monetization potential.

Advertisement

Successful hyper casual game developers treat development as a sequence of validated steps rather than a single build-and-launch cycle.

Step 1 — Concept Discovery & Market Validation

The process begins with identifying game mechanics that have strong engagement potential. Instead of relying purely on creative ideas, experienced teams analyze market trends and player behavior to determine what types of mechanics are currently performing well. This stage typically includes:

  • Studying successful hyper casual titles
  • Identifying proven gameplay mechanics
  • Evaluating market demand
  • Defining the core gameplay loop
  • Estimating monetization potential

The goal is to reduce uncertainty before development begins.

Step 2 — Rapid Prototype Development

Once a concept is validated, developers build a fast prototype that focuses entirely on the core interaction loop. At this stage, visual polish is secondary to testing gameplay engagement.

Prototype builds typically focus on:

Advertisement
  • Core gameplay mechanics
  • Basic player controls
  • Essential game physics
  • Initial difficulty balancing
  • Minimal UI elements

This stage allows developers to test whether the gameplay idea is engaging before committing to full production.

Step 3 — Production & Gameplay Refinement

After prototype validation, the project moves into production. Developers refine gameplay mechanics while improving visual quality and usability. Production usually includes:

  • Final UI/UX design
  • Improved animations and feedback systems
  • Difficulty progression tuning
  • Level design and structure
  • Performance optimization
  • Analytics integration

During this stage, the game begins to resemble a launch-ready product while still allowing room for adjustments.

Step 4 — Testing & Soft Launch

Testing is one of the most important phases in the hyper casual game development process. Soft launches allow developers to measure how real players interact with the game. Teams typically monitor:

  • Player retention rates
  • Session length
  • User progression patterns
  • Ad engagement behavior
  • Drop-off points

These metrics determine whether the game has the potential to scale profitably. Soft launch insights often lead to multiple iterations before global release.

Planning to Launch a Revenue-Generating Hyper Casual Game?

Step 5 — Launch & Post-Launch Optimization

Even after launch, development does not stop. Successful hyper casual games continue evolving based on player behavior and performance metrics. Post-launch optimization usually involves:

  • Adjusting difficulty balance
  • Improving retention mechanics
  • Optimizing ad placements
  • Adding new levels or variations
  • Refining user experience

This stage transforms a functional game into a profitable product.

Process Insight

A structured development pipeline is what allows professional hyper casual game developers to launch multiple titles efficiently. Instead of investing heavily into a single idea, successful teams validate concepts early and refine them continuously. This disciplined process is one of the key reasons why experienced studios consistently produce profitable hyper casual games.

Core Mechanics That Drive Retention

Retention determines whether a hyper casual game can generate consistent revenue. Even small improvements in retention rates can dramatically increase lifetime value per user.

Advertisement

Successful hyper casual games rely on intuitive mechanics that players can understand immediately. Clear goals and instant feedback encourage players to continue interacting with the game. Smooth controls and responsive interactions prevent frustration during early sessions. Professional hyper casual game developers typically focus on optimizing:

  • Immediate player understanding within the first few seconds
  • Fast and responsive controls
  • Short and repeatable gameplay sessions
  • Clear progression milestones
  • Reward-driven engagement loops

Progression systems play an important role in maintaining engagement. Unlockable content, level-based challenges, and performance milestones give players reasons to return. Even simple progression systems can significantly improve long-term engagement.

Visual feedback also contributes to retention. Animations, sound effects, and reward notifications reinforce player actions and create a sense of accomplishment. These small improvements collectively produce large gains in retention and monetization performance.

How Hyper Casual Games Actually Make Money

Understanding how hyper casual games make money is essential for evaluating project viability. Unlike many other game genres, hyper casual titles rely primarily on advertising revenue rather than direct purchases. Most successful hyper casual games generate income through a combination of:

  • Rewarded video ads that players voluntarily watch for extra rewards
  • Interstitial ads shown between gameplay sessions
  • Banner ads that provide passive revenue streams
  • Optional in-app purchases such as ad removal or cosmetic upgrades

Rewarded ads usually produce the highest engagement because players receive direct benefits. Interstitial ads generate consistent income when placed carefully between gameplay sessions. However, aggressive monetization can quickly reduce retention. Successful studios carefully balance engagement and monetization to maintain long-term revenue.

Monetization Optimization Techniques

Monetization optimization involves continuous adjustment based on player behavior. Developers analyze engagement patterns to determine when players are most receptive to advertisements or purchases.

Advertisement

A/B testing is commonly used to compare different ad placement strategies. By testing multiple configurations, developers identify which approaches generate the highest revenue without reducing retention.

Session-based monetization strategies also help maximize earnings. Players who remain engaged longer provide more opportunities for revenue generation. Developers, therefore, focus on increasing session duration through balanced difficulty progression.

Optimization continues after launch as new data becomes available. Successful hyper casual games often undergo multiple iterations of monetization tuning before reaching peak profitability.

Testing and Iteration Strategy

Hyper casual game development relies heavily on testing cycles. Soft launches provide valuable insights into player behavior and monetization potential before global release.

Advertisement

During testing phases, developers monitor key performance indicators such as retention rates, session frequency, and average revenue per user. These metrics help determine whether a game has the potential to scale.

Rapid iteration allows teams to implement improvements quickly. Adjustments to gameplay mechanics, visual design, and monetization systems can significantly improve performance over time.

Testing reduces the risk associated with launching new games and increases the likelihood of financial success.

Talk to Our Hyper Casual Game Developers/ Schedule a Free Demo

Scaling Winning Games

When a hyper casual game demonstrates strong performance metrics, scaling becomes the next priority. User acquisition campaigns increase player numbers, allowing developers to maximize revenue potential. Scaling typically involves:

Advertisement
  • Expanding user acquisition campaigns
  • Optimizing monetization performance
  • Adding new levels and gameplay variations
  • Improving analytics tracking
  • Refining retention mechanics

Scaling requires stable infrastructure and reliable analytics systems. Developers must ensure that performance remains consistent as player numbers grow.

Successful titles often expand through additional content updates and feature enhancements. New levels and gameplay variations help maintain engagement among existing players. Scaling transforms validated prototypes into sustainable revenue-generating products.

Choosing the Right Hyper Casual Game Development Company

Selecting the right development partner plays a critical role in project success. Experienced hyper casual game developers bring structured workflows, analytics expertise, and monetization knowledge that reduce development risks.

Antier, as a reliable hyper casual game development company, demonstrates proven experience in building and launching multiple titles. Proven testing processes and optimization capabilities are strong indicators of Antier’s expertise.

The team combines technical development with a monetization strategy to provide greater long-term value. Development partners who understand both gameplay and business metrics are better positioned to deliver profitable outcomes.

Advertisement

Organizations planning to invest in hyper casual projects should prioritize partners who can support both development as well as optimization.

Final Thoughts

Hyper casual games may appear simple, but profitable titles are the result of disciplined development processes and continuous optimization. Professional hyper casual game developers focus on validation, retention, and monetization rather than simply launching games. This approach reduces risk and improves the probability of financial success.

For decision-makers considering hyper casual projects, understanding the development process and revenue model is essential. Projects built with structured workflows and experienced teams are far more likely to generate sustainable returns.

Frequently Asked Questions

01. What are the common reasons why hyper casual games fail financially?

Hyper casual games often fail due to a lack of structured testing, poor monetization planning, and inadequate scalability considerations. Many projects are developed around a single idea without validation, leading to low retention and revenue despite high download numbers.

Advertisement
02. How do professional hyper casual game developers approach game development?

Professional developers focus on creating systems that maximize player retention, optimize monetization, and allow for rapid iteration, rather than just building a playable game. This structured approach helps ensure long-term revenue generation.

03. Why is monetization planning important for hyper casual games?

Monetization planning is crucial because advertising is the primary revenue source for hyper casual games. Poorly implemented ad placements can drive players away, making it essential to balance engagement with effective monetization strategies to generate sustainable income.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Foundation targets institutions with new privacy framework

Published

on

Foundation targets institutions with new privacy framework

The Solana Foundation is making a new pitch to large institutions: privacy as a customizable feature, not a trade-off.

In a report released on Monday by the foundation, Privacy on Solana: A Full-Spectrum Approach for the Modern Enterprise,” the organization argued that the next phase of crypto adoption will depend less on transparency alone and more on giving companies control over what they reveal — and to whom.

The framing marks a shift from crypto’s early ethos. Public blockchains have traditionally emphasized openness, where transactions are visible and traceable, even if users are represented only by wallet addresses. The report acknowledged that this “pseudonymity” model, while foundational, falls short for many real-world use cases. Financial institutions, for example, may need to prove transactions occurred without exposing counterparties, while companies processing payroll must avoid broadcasting employee salaries.

Underlying the pitch is a technical claim: that Solana’s speed makes advanced privacy techniques practical. The team argued that the network’s high throughput and low latency allow these methods to run at near-web speeds, opening the door to use cases such as encrypted order books or private credit risk calculations.

Advertisement

But rather than offering a single solution for privacy, the foundation presented privacy as a spectrum composed of four distinct modes: pseudonymity, confidentiality, anonymity and fully private systems.

At the base level, pseudonymity keeps identities obscured behind wallet addresses while leaving transaction data visible. Moving along the spectrum, confidentiality allows participants to be known while encrypting sensitive information like balances and transfer amounts.

Anonymity flips that dynamic, hiding the identities of participants while allowing transaction data to remain visible. At the far end are fully private systems, where both identities and transaction data are shielded through techniques like zero-knowledge proofs and multiparty computation.

The message is that no single privacy model fits all. “For enterprises, privacy is a spectrum, not a switch,” the report said.

Advertisement

What Solana is trying to do is bring all of these privacy options into one system. Instead of choosing just one approach, companies can mix and match tools — like hiding transaction amounts, proving something is valid without revealing details, or controlling who can access certain data — depending on what they need.

In practice, that could mean executing trades without revealing order size, sharing risk data across banks without exposing individual balance sheets, or allowing users to prove compliance without disclosing personal information.

The report leans heavily on the idea that privacy and regulation can coexist. The team pointed to mechanisms like “auditor keys,” which enable designated parties to decrypt transactions when required. Other systems would allow wallets to demonstrate compliance status without revealing identity. These features are framed as a response to growing regulatory scrutiny, particularly around anti-money laundering rules and financial surveillance.

“Privacy is a market requirement,” the report said. “Customers expect it and applications require it. On Solana, you choose your privacy level, from encrypted balances to zero-knowledge anonymity to multiparty confidential computing. Each level maps to a compliance path, and each is composable with the broader ecosystem.”

Advertisement

Read more: Solana Foundation’s Liu: Focus on finance, not gaming ‘misadventures’

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Buying the dip? Strategy prefers the top of the range

Published

on

Buying the dip? Strategy prefers the top of the range

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) founder Michael Saylor purchased 1,031 bitcoin (BTC) last week at an average price of $74,326.

Saylor’s buy was in the 80th percentile of the available range and BTC traded between $67,354 and $76,013 during that period. 

It wasn’t a fluke.

Year-to-date across his 12-weekly SEC Form 8-K disclosures totaling 89,599 BTC purchases for $7.25 billion this year, Strategy has consistently bought in the top half of each week’s trading range.

Advertisement

This is according to our analysis of the company’s own SEC filings and corresponding BTC market data.

Strategy’s 2026 purchases of BTC landed above the midpoint of each purchase period’s trading range 80% of the time.

Saylor buys BTC near the top

The pattern holds even when weighting for size. Indeed, Strategy’s two largest purchases of the year, 22,337 BTC in the week ending March 15 and 22,305 BTC in the week ending January 19, both cleared above the midpoint of each week’s range.

The January purchase, disclosed on January 20, cost $95,284 per coin while BTC traded between $90,016 and $97,939 that week.

Advertisement

That placed Strategy at the 66th percentile of the range on its $2.1 billion purchase.

In early February, the firm bought 1,142 BTC at $78,815 during a week when BTC ranged from $59,930 to $79,301. Embarrassingly, that’s the 97th percentile or nearly the worst prices Strategy could have paid.

BTC spent most of that week at much lower prices, but Saylor paid near the ceiling.

Only three of the 12 weekly purchases landed below the midpoint of the range. Worse, those three combined for just 16,705 BTC, or 18.6% of total volume purchased year to date.

Advertisement

‘I’m going to be buying the top forever’

Saylor has acknowledged his approach openly. “I’m going to be buying the top forever,” he posted on X.

Of course, that statement is supposed to reference the slow and long-term price appreciation of BTC, not the literal reality that Saylor is buying near the top of BTC trading ranges.

The numbers confirm it. Strategy’s volume-weighted average purchase price for 2026 is $80,929. BTC currently trades near $70,000, leaving the company’s entire 2026 buying program roughly $1 billion underwater.

Advertisement

The company now holds 762,099 BTC acquired for a blended average of $75,694. At today’s prices, that treasury has an unrealized loss of over $4 billion.

The company’s MSTR common stock, which opened 2026 at $154.59, opened for trading this morning at $138.92, a 10% year-to-date decline.

Each Monday, Saylor discloses the prior week’s purchases via an 8-K filing. The day prior, on Sundays, he usually hints at the purchase by posting some sort of vague yet eminently obvious reference to “orange dots” on his SaylorTracker.

Protos previously noted a similar pattern in April 2025 when Strategy paid well into the top third of the weekly range while BTC spent most of the week near its lows.

Advertisement

Read more: We calculated the present value of STRC — it’s bad for MSTR

To be fair, buying above the midpoint doesn’t automatically mean poor execution. No one knows the best price in advance.

Over the counter desks also handle large blocks at negotiated prices, and Strategy’s large size limits its ability to cherry-pick intraday lows. Strategy also seems to often buy early in the week, and for whatever reason, BTC has traded higher during early weekdays in 2026 than later weekdays.

Still, the consistency of the pattern across 12 consecutive weeks and nearly 90,000 BTC is difficult to dismiss.

Advertisement

Strategy spent $5.8 billion, or 80% of its 2026 outlay, at prices in the upper half of each week’s range.

Saylor, for his part, keeps posting orange dots on Sundays and expensive, top-of-range BTC buys on Monday.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Prediction market boom spurs new VC fund backed by Polymarket, Kalshi CEOs

Published

on

Prediction market Kalshi raises $1 billion at double its December valuation: Bloomberg

A new venture capital firm focused on prediction markets is launching with backing from Polymarket founder and CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi co-founder and CEO Tarek Mansour, Bloomberg reported.

The firm, called 5c(c) Capital (named after a section of the Commodity Exchange Act that governs prediction markets) may be the first venture fund built specifically to invest in companies shaped by that regulatory and market structure.

“We want to capitalize on the second-, third-, and fourth-order effects of what we built ourselves,” the founders wrote in a document viewed by Bloomberg.

The launch comes as prediction markets shift from a niche corner of finance into a more visible part of how people track events. Since the U.S. presidential election, trading volumes have climbed and new users have entered the space. Platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi now host contracts tied to politics, economic data and cultural events, turning public opinion into tradable signals. Polymarket’s trades run on the blockchain. Many crypto-native companies, including Coinbase (COIN) and Kraken, as well as Robinhood (HOOD), have also entered the space in recent months.

Advertisement

That growth has created new business openings beyond the platforms themselves. Startups are beginning to build data tools, liquidity services and compliance systems that support these markets.

5c(c) Capital plans to raise up to $35 million and invest in about 20 portfolio companies over the next two years, according to the document. The strategy centers on early-stage bets tied to infrastructure and services around prediction markets rather than the exchanges alone.

Early backing includes more than twenty investors, among them a portfolio manager at Millennium Management, several crypto-focused venture firms and founders of other prediction market platforms such as PredictIt.

Polymarket declined to comment. Kalshi did not respond in time for publication.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SIREN Crypto Risks ‘Structural Correction’ After 150% Surge to All-Time High

Published

on

SIREN Crypto Risks ‘Structural Correction’ After 150% Surge to All-Time High

Siren crypto (SIREN) just ripped 156% to a new all-time high of $3 driven by the exploding AI Agents narrative. But the rally is showing immediate signs of exhaustion.

A massive bearish divergence on the Money Flow Index (MFI) suggests the top is in, and a $22 million liquidation event has left leverage traders exposed to a sharp reversal.

The token outperformed Bitcoin by over 80% in the last 24 hours. Yet, the on-chain data presents a clear warning: volume is thinning on the way up. The breakdown is confirmed until price proves otherwise.

Key Takeaways
Advertisement
  • Rally: SIREN hit an ATH of $3.00 after a 156% daily surge.
  • Signal: MFI spiked to 82.96, a level that has triggered three prior corrections.
  • Support: Bulls must hold the $2.07 level to prevent a drop to $1.50.

SIREN Price Analysis: Can SIREN Hold $2.07 Support After the ATH Breakout?

The chart structure is screaming caution despite the parabolic move. The Money Flow Index (MFI) is currently pegged at 82.96. Historically, this is the kill zone for SIREN rallies. Vertical lines on the daily chart mark February 7, February 27, and March 15—every time the MFI breached the 80 threshold, price collapsed shortly after.

The $3.00 high triggered a sharp rejection, validating the bearish thesis. The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) printed a lower high of 0.14 while price made a higher high. This implies a (Price Correction) is imminent, as capital is leaving even as price pushes up.

Source: SIRENUSD / TradingView

Structure is fragile here. Traders are watching the $2.07 level closely. Lose that, and the 38.2% retracement level comes into play quickly.

A breakdown below $2.00 opens the path to $1.50. This aligns with risks seen elsewhere, such as recent whale shorting activity on Bitcoin, which often precedes altcoin weakness. The only path higher requires a daily close above $2.60 to invalidate the divergence. Until then, the bears are in control.

Discover: The best new crypto in the world

Advertisement

The post SIREN Crypto Risks ‘Structural Correction’ After 150% Surge to All-Time High appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP hits a snag after Monday’s relief rally, active addresses down 40%

Published

on

xrp price outlook
xrp price outlook
  • Active XRP addresses dropped over 40% in four days.
  • XRP price remains stuck between a tight trading range.
  • Retail holders have grown, but overall network activity is slowing.

XRP has entered a tight and uncertain phase after a brief rally following an announcement by US President Donald Trump that the United States will pause strikes on energy and power installations in Iran after the expiry of the 48-hour ultimatum on opening the Strait of Hormuz.

The momentum that initially lifted prices following Trump’s announcement now appears to be fading as the market struggles to find direction.

At the time of writing, XRP is trading around $1.43.

Advertisement

The price has moved within a narrow range between $1.36 and $1.46, reflecting hesitation among traders after a week where XRP slipped by about 5%, extending its broader downward trend over the past year.

While the recent rally gave traders hope, the follow-through has been weak.

XRP Ledger activity drops sharply

One of the most notable developments is the sharp decline in XRP Ledger (XRPL) network activity.

Notably, XRP’s active addresses have fallen by more than 40% within just a few days, according to the data obtained from CryptoQuant.

Advertisement
XRP Ledger Active Addresses
Source: CryptoQuant

This drop signals a slowdown in user engagement, which often reflects reduced demand in the short term.

Fewer active participants usually translate to less transaction volume and weaker momentum.

This decline contrasts with the earlier optimism that surrounded XRP’s growing number of wallet holders.

While more people may be holding XRP, fewer are actively using it.

This gap between ownership and activity suggests that investors are choosing to wait rather than act.

Advertisement

Such behaviour is common during uncertain market conditions.

Retail growth continues despite the slowdown

Even as activity drops, the number of smaller XRP holders continues to grow steadily.

This trend points to increasing retail interest in the asset.

A rising base of small holders often signals long-term confidence, even if short-term sentiment is mixed.

Advertisement

It also suggests that XRP is becoming more widely distributed rather than concentrated in a few large hands.

However, growing ownership alone does not guarantee price growth.

Without strong network activity to support it, price movements can remain limited.

This is the situation XRP appears to be facing now.

Advertisement

XRP price outlook

XRP’s current price movements reflect a market caught between opposing forces.

On one hand, there is optimism driven by broader adoption and past rally attempts.

On the other hand, there is clear evidence of weakening participation and fading momentum.

The asset remains well below its previous peak, showing that recovery is still incomplete.

Advertisement

Short-term price action suggests consolidation rather than a decisive move in either direction, with the immediate support level at near $1.33 holding for now.

XRP price chart
Source: TradingView

At the same time, resistance around $1.54 to $1.60 continues to limit upward movement, creating a narrow trading range that traders are watching closely.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SEC Sends Proposed Crypto Interpretation to White House for Review

Published

on

Cryptocurrencies, Law, SEC, White House

The financial regulator’s plan to reinterpret how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets is ”pending review” by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has forwarded its proposal to have most crypto assets not treated as securities under federal law to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget.

According to information available through the US General Services Administration, on Friday the SEC sent two proposed rules to the White House for review, including its interpretative notice from last week regarding which digital assets the agency could consider a security under federal law.

Advertisement

As of Monday, government records showed the proposal as “pending review” by the White House, potentially changing how the SEC handles regulation and enforcement of digital assets.

Cryptocurrencies, Law, SEC, White House
Source: Reginfo.gov

In a notice issued by the SEC last week, Chair Paul Atkins said that the agency would not consider four types of digital assets as securities under its purview: digital commodities, digital tools, digital collectibles — including non-fungible tokens — and stablecoins. The interpretation said that it would provide the agency with a “coherent token taxonomy” for the four types of assets and address how a “non-security crypto asset” may or may not be considered an investment contract.

The SEC rule, if finalized, would provide a bridge to crypto regulation until Congress were to pass a market structure bill to clarify comprehensive regulations of digital assets. The interpretation of federal securities laws followed the signing of a memorandum of understanding with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) — the other federal financial regulator expected to regulate digital assets under the proposed market structure bill — earlier this month.

Related: CFTC staff clarify expectations on using crypto as collateral

White House reportedly reached “agreement in principle” on crypto bill

Politico reported on Friday that representatives from the White House and Congressional lawmakers reached a deal on stablecoin yield that could advance the market structure bill in the Senate Banking Committee. The panel indefinitely postponed its markup of the bill, called the CLARITY Act, in January following Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong saying the exchange could not support the legislation as written.

Advertisement

As of Monday, the banking committee had not publicly announced a new date for the bill’s markup. Senate Majority Leader John Thune reportedly said in March that the chamber intended to prioritize a vote on the SAVE America Act — legislation that would require voters to provide proof of US citizenship in person to register — before bills with bipartisan support, such as CLARITY.

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?