Connect with us

Crypto World

Hyperliquid Launches Policy Center to Shape DeFi Regulations in D.C.

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Hyperliquid has launched the Hyperliquid Policy Center in Washington, D.C., to advocate for clearer regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi). The new nonprofit aims to focus on DeFi regulation and perpetual derivatives while engaging lawmakers and regulators. With prominent crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky at the helm as CEO, the center plans to provide advocacy and research around policy issues impacting the decentralized financial space.

The initiative, funded by a $28 million contribution from the Hyper Foundation, aims to represent Hyperliquid’s ecosystem in policy discussions. The launch comes at a critical time when U.S. lawmakers are considering the future of blockchain technology and decentralized markets. With the financial markets shifting toward blockchain infrastructure, the new policy center seeks to address the gaps in U.S. regulations regarding decentralized systems.

Jake Chervinsky Leads the Hyperliquid Policy Center’s Efforts

Jake Chervinsky, a well-known advocate for DeFi policy, will lead the Hyperliquid Policy Center. He emphasized that the center is an independent organization focused on research and advocacy. The policy center’s mission is to ensure that DeFi can continue to thrive within the U.S. financial system. Chervinsky pointed out that while financial markets are increasingly moving to public blockchains, regulators have yet to create rules to accommodate decentralized systems like Hyperliquid.

He also noted that DeFi platforms like Hyperliquid face regulatory challenges that were not foreseen in traditional financial laws. Hyperliquid itself operates on a public, permissionless blockchain and has grown to rival centralized exchanges in terms of liquidity. According to Chervinsky, current U.S. regulations do not fully align with decentralized technologies, which creates regulatory uncertainties.

Chervinsky explained that the Hyperliquid Policy Center will work directly with U.S. lawmakers and regulators to establish clearer rules for blockchain-based financial infrastructure. The goal is to ensure that U.S.-based companies can innovate and operate in the decentralized finance space without facing regulatory hurdles that could stifle growth.

Advertisement

Funding and Support from the Hyper Foundation

To support its efforts, the Hyper Foundation has contributed 1 million HYPE tokens, valued at $28 million. These tokens will be unstaked immediately and will help fund the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center. The foundation emphasized that this contribution demonstrates its commitment to the long-term success of the DeFi ecosystem in Washington, D.C.

The Hyper Foundation’s contribution not only helps launch the policy center but also ensures that the community has a voice in regulatory discussions. The foundation aims to help bridge the gap between the DeFi sector and policymakers. Through its contribution, the foundation hopes to elevate the discussion about decentralized finance at the federal level.

As part of its mission, the policy center will produce technical research, publish commentaries on proposed regulations, and answer questions related to decentralized markets. The center will also serve as a resource for lawmakers and regulators to better understand the technical aspects of DeFi.

The Policy Center’s Team and Focus Areas

The Hyperliquid Policy Center has also introduced its founding team, which includes Brad Bourque and Salah Ghazzal. Bourque, the new Policy Counsel, has previously worked with Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, bringing legal expertise to the center’s efforts. Ghazzal, the Policy Director, has experience working as a policy lead at Variant, further strengthening the team’s understanding of regulatory affairs.

Advertisement

The team will focus on several key areas, particularly decentralized finance and perpetual derivatives. They plan to contribute to ongoing policy debates and engage in discussions on how existing regulations apply to decentralized technologies. In addition to advocacy, the center will provide technical insights to help inform policymakers about how DeFi platforms operate and the risks involved.

The center also plans to dive deep into complex issues tied to decentralized markets. This includes providing feedback on proposed rules and offering recommendations for how regulations can be adapted to the evolving DeFi landscape.

The Hyperliquid Policy Center and the CLARITY Act

The launch of the Hyperliquid Policy Center coincides with ongoing discussions around the CLARITY Act, which is currently stalled in the Senate Banking Committee. The bill aims to divide oversight of digital assets, classifying them either as digital commodities under the CFTC or as investment contract assets under SEC rules. While the bill has faced delays, including the cancellation of markup sessions scheduled for January, it remains a key piece of legislation for the future of blockchain regulation in the U.S.

Jake Chervinsky has been vocal in his support for the CLARITY Act, calling for stronger protections for DeFi platforms during the legislative process. He has warned that the DeFi community needs clear protections in place for the industry to continue developing and evolving. Chervinsky has also emphasized the importance of safeguarding developers from legal liabilities while ensuring that DeFi platforms comply with applicable regulations.

Advertisement

As the Hyperliquid Policy Center begins its advocacy efforts, it will likely play a key role in pushing for stronger safeguards and clearer rules for the DeFi sector as the CLARITY Act moves forward.

The Future of DeFi Regulation and Advocacy

The Hyperliquid Policy Center’s launch highlights the growing need for clear regulatory frameworks around decentralized finance in the United States. As more financial services move to blockchain-based platforms, lawmakers will face increasing pressure to address the legal and regulatory challenges that these technologies present.

By focusing on education and advocacy, the Hyperliquid Policy Center aims to fill a critical gap in the current regulatory landscape. Its work will not only support the interests of the Hyperliquid ecosystem but also help shape the future of DeFi regulation in the U.S. Through its leadership and research, the center hopes to ensure that DeFi continues to thrive while operating within a clear and fair regulatory framework.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Moonwell’s AI-coded oracle glitch misprices cbETH at $1, drains $1.78M

Published

on

Crypto VC Funding Reaches $244M as Mesh Leads

Moonwell’s lending pools racked up about $1.78M in bad debt after a cbETH oracle mispriced the token at nearly $1 instead of around $2.2k, enabling bots and liquidators to drain collateral within hours of a misconfigured Chainlink-based update reportedly using AI-generated logic.

Summary

  • Misconfigured cbETH oracle set price near $1 vs roughly $2.2k, triggering a ~99% valuation gap that broke Moonwell’s collateral math.
  • Liquidators repaid around $1 per position to seize over 1,096 cbETH, leaving Moonwell with roughly $1.78M in protocol-level bad debt.
  • Faulty formula and scaling logic were reportedly co-authored by AI model Claude Opus 4.6, spotlighting new DeFi risk around AI-written oracle and pricing code.

Decentralized finance lending protocol Moonwell suffered a $1.78 million exploit due to a pricing oracle bug that misvalued Coinbase-wrapped ETH (cbETH), according to reports from the platform.

Advertisement

The vulnerability originated in oracle calculation logic reportedly generated by the AI model Claude Opus 4.6, which introduced an incorrect scaling factor in the asset price feed, according to the protocol’s disclosure. Attackers borrowed against severely underpriced collateral, extracting funds before the error was detected and corrected.

The cbETH mispricing effectively collapsed the collateral requirement for borrowing within affected pools. Because lending systems rely on accurate collateral ratios, the incorrect price allowed attackers to extract assets with minimal backing value, according to the protocol’s technical analysis.

Price oracles represent critical security components in DeFi lending systems. Incorrect asset valuation can enable under-collateralized borrowing or liquidation failures. Many major DeFi exploits have historically involved oracle manipulation or pricing errors rather than core protocol flaws, according to industry security reports.

The Moonwell incident differs from traditional oracle exploits in that the faulty logic appears linked to automated AI code generation rather than malicious oracle data feeds, according to the protocol’s preliminary investigation.

The exploit highlights risks associated with AI-assisted smart-contract development in financial applications. Language models can accelerate coding workflows, but financial protocols require precise numerical correctness, unit handling and edge-case validation, according to blockchain security experts.

Advertisement

In DeFi systems, small arithmetic or scaling mistakes can translate into systemic vulnerabilities affecting collateral valuation and solvency. The incident raises questions about whether AI-generated contract components may require stricter auditing standards than manually written code, according to security researchers.

AI-assisted development is increasingly used across Web3 engineering workflows, from contract templates to integration logic. Security models and audit frameworks have not yet fully adapted to AI-generated contract code, according to industry observers.

The broader implications center on how automated code generation errors in financial logic represent a new category of DeFi risk. Oracle math, scaling factors and unit conversions remain high-precision domains where automation failures can propagate into protocol-level vulnerabilities, according to technical analysis of the incident.

As AI-assisted smart-contract development expands, audit methodologies will likely need to evolve toward verifying not only code correctness but generation provenance and numerical invariants, according to blockchain security firms.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Kalshi Data Could Inform Fed Reserve Policy, Say Researchers

Published

on

Kalshi Data Could Inform Fed Reserve Policy, Say Researchers

Three researchers at the US Federal Reserve argue that prediction market Kalshi can better measure macroeconomic expectations in real time than existing solutions and thus should be incorporated into the Fed’s decision-making process.

The “Kalshi and the Rise of Macro Markets” paper was released on Feb. 12 by Federal Reserve Board principal economist Anthony Diercks, Federal Reserve research assistant Jared Dean Katz and Johns Hopkins research associate Jonathan Wright.

Kalshi data was compared with traditional surveys and market-implied forecasts to examine how beliefs about future economic outcomes change in response to macroeconomic news and statements from policymakers.

Source: Tarek Mansour

“Managing expectations is central to modern macroeconomic policy. Yet the tools that are often relied upon—surveys and financial derivatives—have many drawbacks,” the researchers said, adding that Kalshi can capture the market’s “beliefs directly and in real time.”

“Kalshi markets provide a high-frequency, continuously updated, distributionally rich benchmark that is valuable to both researchers and policymakers.”

Kalshi traders can bet on a range of markets tied to the Federal Reserve’s decision-making, including consumer price index inflation and payroll, in addition to other macroeconomic outcomes such as gross domestic product growth and gas prices.

Advertisement

The Fed researchers said Kalshi data should be used to provide a risk-neutral probability density function, which shows all possible outcomes of Fed interest rate decisions and how likely each one is. 

“Overall, we argue that Kalshi should be used to provide risk-neutral [probability density functions] concerning FOMC decisions at specific meetings” arguing that the current benchmark is “too far removed from the monetary policy interest rate decision.”

However, Fed research papers are only “preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion” and do not impact the central bank’s decision-making.