Connect with us

Crypto World

Is Aave Labs’ proposal ‘extractive’? DAO debate heats up

Published

on

Is Aave Labs’ proposal ‘extractive’? DAO debate heats up

Since December, the DeFi sector’s largest protocol has been wrestling with an existential question, pitting Aave Labs against the DAO: who owns Aave?

What began as a discussion over swap fees rapidly escalated into an existential debate about ownership of the Aave brand, as well as the rights to monetize it.

Yesterday, Aave Labs published a “temperature check” entitled “Aave Will Win Framework” on the Aave governance forum.

Their headline is “100% of product revenue to the Aave DAO,” but the post, which runs to almost 4,000 words, doesn’t end there.

Advertisement

Read more: Aave brand dispute rumbles on as founder buys £22M London property

At a high level, the post proposes that all of Aave product revenue will be directed to the DAO. A foundation would also be set up to “assume responsibility for holding and stewarding” the Aave brand.

This addresses the DAO’s concerns around Labs’ potential brand capture on products including the front end, Aave’s app, card and institution-focused Horizon market.

Advertisement

These concessions are accompanied by a funding request for considerable sums, namely $25 million in stablecoins and 75,000 AAVE.

Further grants totaling $17.5 would be “payable upon specific product launches.”

The initial payment of stablecoins would be partially ($5 million) upfront, with the remainder streamed over the following year. AAVE tokens would unlock linearly over two years.

It clarifies “all funds will be spent on Aave-related efforts” such as “user acquisition, marketing, and ongoing development.”

Advertisement

Correct destination, but the route ‘needs work’

While DAO advocates generally see the proposal as directionally positive, concerns remain over the calculation of revenue. That, and the vast sum of tokens requested, both stables and AAVE.

Vocal DAO delegate Marc Zeller reacted harshly to begin with, calling Labs’ proposal “extractive” and a “gaslight.” He sees it as “raiding” DAO tokens “for zero actual enforceable commitment.”

A longer follow-up post was more positive, recognising “victory” for the DAO, while also recognizing that the move is essentially “four proposals in a trenchcoat.”

However, Zeller warns that, in calculating revenue, “deductions are at Aave Labs’ sole discretion. No independent audit. No cap. No DAO approval threshold.”

Advertisement

He also underlines that the $50 million worth of tokens requested represents “31.5% of the entire treasury. For a single service provider. In a single vote.”

Furthermore, the additional 75,000 AAVE tokens would further increase Labs dominance of DAO voting.

AAVE voting power

Aave Labs isn’t shy about flexing its muscles during sensitive votes.

In what was branded a “disgraceful” move, Labs triggered a surprise vote on contributor Ernesto Boado’s proposal over the Christmas holidays.

Advertisement

The proposal was voted down with 55% against, while the majority of DAO delegates abstained.

Additionally, Zeller suspects that today’s narrowly-rejected vote on “mandatory disclosures” was, ironically, heavily influenced by undisclosed Labs-linked wallets.

Forking over another 75,000 tokens would only increase Labs’ ability to swing future votes in its favor.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

USDC tops Tether as stablecoin transfers hit all-time high $1.8T

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Stablecoins are delivering a liquidity surge unseen in recent cycles, with February marking a record on-chain transfer activity and signaling a shift in how capital moves through crypto markets. Allium’s data shows total stablecoin transfers climbed to $1.8 trillion in February, underscoring a robust appetite for dollar-pegged liquidity across chains. Within that, USDC accounted for roughly 70% of stablecoin activity, while USDt handled about $514 billion in transfers. The divergence—USDC’s dominance in flow despite a smaller market cap—illustrates how on-chain dynamics can outpace headline market-size metrics. The backdrop includes Circle reporting strong Q4 2025 earnings tied to rapid USDC business growth and expanded payments operations, alongside broader regulatory chatter shaping stablecoin frameworks.

Key takeaways

  • February set a monthly record for stablecoin transfer volume at $1.8 trillion, according to Allium data.
  • USDC comprised roughly 70% of all stablecoin transfer volume, with $1.26 trillion moved in February.
  • USDt accounted for about $514 billion in stablecoin transfers in the same month, highlighting a substantial, yet smaller, slice of activity.
  • USDC’s transfer volume has consistently surpassed USDt in recent months, even as USDt retains a larger market cap; Moonrock Capital’s Simon Dedic highlighted the trend on social media.
  • New supply dynamics saw USDC minting accelerate in March, with Arkham data showing more than $3 billion minted in the first week of the month, while USDt’s supply remained comparatively flat.
  • Broader liquidity signals—such as rising stablecoin supply on exchanges and the Stablecoin Supply Ratio’s recovery—converge with Bitcoin’s renewed price momentum, suggesting improving buying power in the market.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $USDC, $USDT

Sentiment: Bullish

Price impact: Positive. A higher on-chain stablecoin presence translates into greater liquidity for buyers, which can support price recoveries during risk-on periods.

Market context: The current liquidity uptick comes as crypto markets digest improved risk sentiment and a more active stablecoin ecosystem. Regulatory developments, including state-level discussions around stablecoins in places like Florida, add a layer of policy uncertainty that market participants are watching closely. These dynamics shape how liquidity profiles evolve across exchanges and DeFi protocols, influencing funding costs, slippage, and the pace of any potential rebound in broader crypto markets.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The February data illuminate a shift in how liquidity is sourced and deployed within the crypto ecosystem. Stablecoins are not only serving as a unit of account and settlement layer; they are becoming a primary engine for on-chain liquidity, enabling faster settlement and cross-chain movement. This has practical implications for traders, liquidity providers, and developers building on-ramp/off-ramp solutions, as larger flows can reduce slippage and improve the efficiency of executing large trades without destabilizing prices.

From an investor perspective, the observed dynamic—where USDC shows outsized transfer activity despite a smaller market cap relative to USDT—suggests that on-chain demand and real-use cases (such as payments, settlements, and cross-chain liquidity provisioning) can outpace traditional metrics. For builders and wallets, the data point to a thriving settlement layer, underscoring why stablecoins remain central to DeFi liquidity provisioning and cross-chain ecosystems. The broader regulatory context, including bills or policy proposals under consideration in jurisdictions like Florida, could influence user adoption and the pace at which institutions participate in stablecoin ecosystems, even as on-chain demand remains robust.

The market’s attention remains anchored on indicators that go beyond wallet counts or market caps and instead focus on real, on-chain activity. The Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR), which tracks Bitcoin’s market cap relative to stablecoin supply, has been recovering after a February dip, a signal CryptoQuant analyst Sunny Mom described as indicating “buying power returning to the market.” This sentiment aligns with a rebound in stablecoin supply on exchanges, where data indicate inflows contributing to a three-week high of roughly $66.5 billion, and with March inflows of about $5.14 billion on a single day tightening the liquidity pipeline. When sidelined capital returns to centralized and decentralized venues, it often precedes price moves in the flagship crypto assets, including Bitcoin and ether, as traders position for shifts in risk appetite.

What to watch next

  • How March USDC minting evolves relative to USDT, and whether the pace sustains the early-month momentum observed by Arkham data.
  • The trajectory of the SSR metric and whether rising stablecoin inflows on exchanges persist into the next quarter.
  • Regulatory developments around stablecoins, including any state-level bills or federal policy steps that could affect settlement rails and cross-border payments.
  • Circle’s ongoing earnings and operational updates, especially around USDC’s settlement capabilities and any further expansion of payments networks (as noted in prior earnings coverage).
  • Monitoring the price action of Bitcoin and other major assets as liquidity flows and risk sentiment evolve, including shifts in funding rates and on-chain transaction activity.

Sources & verification

  • Allium data on stablecoin transfer volumes, February metrics for USDC and USDt transfers.
  • Arkham data on USDC minting pace in March, including the first-week minting total.
  • Moonrock Capital — Simon Dedic’s observation on USDC vs USDT transfer volumes (social post).
  • Cointelegraph coverage on Circle’s Q4/2025 earnings and USDC-related growth and settlement expansion.
  • CryptoQuant analysis of SSR recovery and related exchange stablecoin inflows (including the March 5 figure of $5.14 billion).
  • Florida Senate coverage of state-level stablecoin legislation and related regulatory considerations.

Stablecoins drive liquidity and the road ahead

The on-chain era is increasingly defined by how dollars move between wallets, scripts, and cross-chain bridges rather than by standalone token flips alone. February’s record stablecoin transfer volume, led by USDC (CRYPTO: USDC) and supported by a broad base of on-chain activity, suggests a fresh wave of liquidity is re-entering markets. While USDt (CRYPTO: USDT) remains the larger market-cap holder, its role in daily transaction flow appears to be waning relative to USDC’s immediate-use utility and cross-chain flexibility. This divergence — a rising proportion of actual transfers in USDC alongside ongoing growth of USDT’s nominal cap — highlights the complexity of today’s liquidity stack: more dollars are moving in ways that can support trades, settlements, and potentially price resilience as macro and regulatory signals evolve.

Watching the next few weeks will be instructive: will USDC sustain its elevated transfer-volume share and continue minting beyond the early March pace observed by Arkham? Will the SSR continue its ascent as more stablecoins circulate on exchanges? And how will policymakers respond to a stablecoin ecosystem that both powers practical payments and invites heightened scrutiny? The answers will shape not only the immediate liquidity environment but also the longer-term viability of stablecoins as liquidity rails for the crypto market.

Advertisement

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

South Korea Bars Stablecoins from Corporate Crypto Investment Guidelines Over Legal Conflict

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • South Korea FSC excludes USDT and USDC from corporate crypto investment guidelines over legal conflicts.
  • The Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not recognize stablecoins as a valid external payment method.
  • Listed companies may invest in the top 20 non-stablecoin assets, capped at 5% of their own capital.
  • A pending amendment to the Foreign Exchange Act could eventually open the door for stablecoin inclusion.

Stablecoins, including USDT and USDC, are set to be excluded from South Korea’s corporate cryptocurrency investment guidelines.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is preparing rules to allow listed companies to trade digital assets.

According to Herald Economy, regulators have opted to keep dollar-pegged stablecoins out of the approved investment list.

The decision stems from a conflict with the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. This law does not currently recognize stablecoins as a legal external payment method.

Legal Conflict Shapes the Stablecoin Decision

South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act requires external payments to go through designated foreign exchange banks. Stablecoins are not classified as external payment instruments under this law.

Advertisement

Allowing corporate investment in stablecoins would create a direct legal contradiction. The FSC chose to exclude stablecoins from the new corporate investment guidelines.

A partial amendment to the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act was introduced to the National Assembly in October. The amendment aims to formally recognize stablecoins as a means of payment.

The bill, however, remains under review and has not yet been passed. Until the law changes, stablecoins cannot be included in corporate investment guidelines.

Advertisement

Instead, the FSC plans to permit the top 20 non-stablecoin digital assets by market capitalization. Bitcoin and Ethereum are among the assets expected to be approved under these rules.

Investment amounts may also be capped at 5% of a company’s own capital. This limit is designed to reduce exposure during the early market stages.

Some listed companies with cross-border trade had requested stablecoin inclusion in the guidelines. They argued stablecoins support exchange rate hedging and fast international settlements.

The FSC, however, maintained its position and excluded stablecoins from the permitted investment list.

Advertisement

Corporate Stablecoin Access Remains Outside Regulated Guidelines

Even without official guidelines covering stablecoins, companies can still trade them through other channels. Personal wallets like MetaMask and overseas exchanges such as Coinbase’s OTC platform remain accessible to corporations.

These transactions, however, operate outside any officially regulated framework. The guidelines do not block companies from using stablecoins entirely.

Authorities noted that some companies already use stablecoins through personal accounts or overseas exchange platforms for trade.

These transactions occur outside formal banking channels. The FSC acknowledged this but still chose not to formalize stablecoin use in the guidelines. Regulators placed legal consistency above industry convenience in this case.

Advertisement

An industry insider confirmed the corporate guidelines task force has wrapped up its work. “I know that the working task force on corporate guidelines has been completed,” the insider said.

They added, “It is in line with the legislative status of the Phase 2 Digital Asset Framework Act, so we have to wait and see, but it is a knotted situation.” Progress, therefore, depends heavily on how the broader legal framework develops.

The FSC’s approach signals a cautious entry into corporate digital asset participation. By limiting access to top non-stablecoin assets, regulators aim to manage financial risk.

Companies seeking stablecoin access will likely need to wait for the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act to be amended.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Stablecoin Transaction Volume Hits a New Record High as USDC Surpasses USDT

Published

on

Stablecoin Transaction Volume Hits a New Record High as USDC Surpasses USDT

Stablecoins have hit an all-time high in monthly transaction volume, as Circle’s USDC (USDC) flipped Tether’s USDt (USDT), new data shows.

Key takeaways:

  • Stablecoin monthly transaction volume reached a record $1.8 trillion in February.

  • USDC comprised 70% of all stablecoin volume.

  • Rising stablecoin supply on exchanges puts crypto markets in a good position to recover.

USDC “consistently” flips USDt transfer volume

The stablecoin transfer volume reached $1.8 trillion in February, setting a monthly record, according to data from Allium.

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, typically pegged to fiat currencies like the US dollar, and can be hosted on multiple blockchains.

Advertisement
Stablecoin transaction volume ($). Source: Allium

Similarly, the volume of USDC transactions reached a high of $1.26 trillion, representing a new milestone in the adoption of the second-largest stablecoin by market cap since its launch in September 2018. 

Related: Florida Senate passes state-level stablecoin bill, awaits DeSantis’ signature

This was more than double that of USDt, whose transfer volume was $514 billion in February.

Transaction volume by stablecoin. Source: Allium

In fact, USDC has “consistently flipped” Tether in transfer volume over the last few months, founder at Moonrock Capital, Simon Dedic, said in a Friday post on X. 

USDC’s usage comes as a “surprise” given that its market cap is less than half that of USDt, Dedic added. USDC is the second-largest stablecoin by market cap at $77.4 billion, compared to USDt’s $184 billion.

Moreover, USDC’s supply has grown faster than USDt’s in recent weeks. Over $3 billion in USDC has been printed already in March, according to market intelligence firm Arkham, as USDt’s supply has remained relatively unchanged.

Advertisement

As Cointelegraph reported, USDC issuer Circle Internet Group reported strong Q4/2025 earnings, attributed to rapid growth in the USDC’s business and expanding payments operations.

Advertisement

More stablecoin liquidity suggests “buying power”

The Stablecoin Supply Ratio (SSR), or the ratio of the Bitcoin (BTC) market cap relative to stablecoin market cap, is “steadily recovering after crashing” in February, said CryptoQuant analyst Sunny Mom in a Friday Quicktake post, adding:

“This shows buying power is returning to the market.”

Bitcoin: Stablecoin Supply Ratio: Source: CryptoQuant

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s latest push to $74,000 was fueled by a recovery in stablecoin supply on crypto exchanges, which rose to a three-week high of $66.5 billion on Friday. 

Stablecoin supply on exchanges. Source: CryptoQuant

Stablecoin inflows to exchanges have boosted the SSR alongside Bitcoin’s (BTC) price. On March 5, the total amount of stablecoins transferred to the exchange amounted to nearly $5.14 billion, up from $1.14 billion on March 1.

More stablecoins on exchanges means more buying power for cryptocurrencies. In the past, the return of sidelined capital to exchanges was a major catalyst for the start of Bitcoin bull markets.