Connect with us

Crypto World

Is the Fed Already Too Late for Rate Cuts? Warning Signs Suggest Policy Overtightening

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • Truflation shows US inflation near 0.68% while Federal Reserve maintains restrictive policy stance 
  • Credit card delinquencies and auto loan defaults rise, signaling late-cycle economic stress levels 
  • Labor market weakening faster than Fed acknowledges with rising layoffs and hiring slowdowns across sectors 
  • Monetary policy lag means economic damage may occur before Fed reacts to confirmed weakness in data

 

Is the Fed already too late for rate cuts? This question dominates market discussions as economic indicators increasingly diverge from official central bank messaging.

Real-time inflation data shows rapid cooling while credit stress and labor weakness accelerate across sectors. The Federal Reserve maintains rates at restrictive levels despite mounting evidence of economic deceleration.

Policy timing has become critical as analysts debate whether preventive cuts or reactive measures will shape the next cycle.

Policy Lag Creates Timing Dilemma for Rate Adjustments

Monetary policy operates with substantial delays between action and economic impact. Rate changes require months to fully influence business investment and consumer spending patterns.

Advertisement

By the time official statistics confirm weakness, underlying conditions may have deteriorated significantly. This lag effect raises concerns about the Fed’s current positioning.

Real-time inflation tracking suggests price pressures have cooled dramatically from previous peaks. According to Bull Theory, “Truflation is showing US inflation near 0.68%” while the Fed maintains its cautious stance on price stability.

This reading contradicts central bank statements emphasizing sticky inflation and persistent concerns. The gap between alternative metrics and policy rhetoric continues widening.

Bull Theory highlighted this disconnect in recent market commentary, noting that “the Fed keeps repeating that the job market is still strong” despite contradictory signals.

Advertisement

The analysis emphasized that layoffs, credit defaults, and bankruptcies are rising simultaneously. These developments typically emerge when restrictive policy begins damaging weaker economic participants.

Yet official communications continue to characterize the economy as fundamentally resilient.

Credit markets flash late-cycle warning signals across consumer and corporate segments. Credit card delinquencies have increased alongside auto loan default rates.

Corporate bankruptcy filings are accelerating as higher borrowing costs strain over-leveraged balance sheets. Small businesses face particular vulnerability when capital costs remain elevated for extended periods.

Economic Deterioration Outpaces Fed Recognition Timeline

Labor market conditions show progressive weakening despite central bank assertions of continued strength. Hiring slowdowns and increased layoff announcements paint a different picture than official statements suggest.

Advertisement

Wage trend data indicate a moderating demand for workers across industries. The employment situation is degrading faster than policy rhetoric acknowledges.

The risk equation has shifted from inflation concerns toward deflation threats. Bull Theory warned that “inflation slows spending, but deflation stops spending,” highlighting the danger of delayed policy response.

When consumers expect falling prices, purchasing decisions shift toward delay rather than immediate action. Businesses respond by reducing production and cutting workforce expenses.

Credit stress serves as an early indicator of policy overtightening relative to economic capacity. Rising delinquencies across credit categories demonstrate that households and corporations struggle under current rate levels.

Advertisement

These pressures typically spread from weaker participants to broader segments if conditions remain restrictive. The damage compounds as financial stress feeds back into reduced spending and investment.

The analyst posed a critical question: “If inflation is already cooling, if the labor market is already weakening, if credit stress is already rising, then holding rates restrictive for too long can amplify the slowdown instead of stabilizing it.”

Markets have begun pricing expectations for policy reversal driven by growth fears rather than inflation control. The next phase may hinge on whether rate cuts arrive soon enough to stabilize conditions or merely react to confirmed recession.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Only 10K Bitcoin is Quantum-Vulnerable and Worth Attacking

Published

on

Only 10K Bitcoin is Quantum-Vulnerable and Worth Attacking

Digital asset manager CoinShares has brushed aside concerns that quantum computers could soon shake up the Bitcoin market, arguing that only a fraction of coins are held in wallets worth attacking.

In a post on Friday, CoinShares Bitcoin research lead Christopher Bendiksen argued that just 10,230 Bitcoin (BTC) of 1.63 million Bitcoin sit in wallet addresses with publicly visible cryptographic keys that are vulnerable to a quantum computing attack.

A little over 7,000 Bitcoin are held in wallets with between 100 and 1,000 BTC, while roughly 3,230 Bitcoin are held in wallets with 1,000 to 10,000 BTC, equating to $719.1 million at current market prices, which Bendiksen said could even resemble a routine trade.

The remaining 1.62 million Bitcoin are held in wallets with holdings under 100 BTC, which Bendiksen claimed would each take a millennium to unlock, even in the “most outlandishly optimistic scenario of technological progression in quantum computing.”

Advertisement
Split of quantum-vulnerable Bitcoin across various holding sizes. Source: CoinShares

The CoinShares researcher said these “theoretical risks” stem from quantum algorithms such as Shor’s, which could break Bitcoin’s elliptic-curve signatures, and Grover’s, which could weaken the Secure Hash Algorithm 256-bit (SHA-256).

However, he argued neither quantum algorithm could alter Bitcoin’s 21 million supply cap or bypass proof-of-work, two of the Bitcoin network’s most foundational features.

Quantum fears have been among the many drivers of Bitcoin FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) in recent months, with critics warning that any compromise of its cryptography could threaten a network that currently secures $1.4 trillion in value.

The Bitcoin at risk are unspent transaction output (UTXO) wallets, which are chunks of Bitcoin tied to wallet addresses that have not been spent. Many of these Bitcoin wallets at risk date back to the Satoshi era.