Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Kalshi CEO Defends Khamenei Market Settlement Amid Backlash Over Death Carve-out Rules

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Kalshi’s “Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader?” market accumulated over $50 million in total trading volume.
  • Traders who held positions before Khamenei’s death were paid out at the last-traded price of 1:14 AM ET.
  • Kalshi’s promotional post on X during the strikes drew sharp criticism from former SEC chief of staff Fischer.
  • Six Democratic senators urged the CFTC to ban contracts that resolve on or correlate to an individual’s death.

 

Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated prediction market platform, is under scrutiny following its handling of a controversial contract tied to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Khamenei was killed in U.S.-Israeli strikes early Saturday morning. The market, titled “Ali Khamenei Out as Supreme Leader?” had accumulated over $50 million in total trading volume. Roughly $20 million of that traded on Saturday alone, according to prediction market analyst Dustin Gouker.

Settlement Process Draws Criticism

Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour addressed the controversy directly on X. “We don’t list markets directly tied to death,” Mansour wrote. “When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death.”

Under the CFTC-filed contract terms, positions would settle at the last-traded price before Khamenei’s death. That price was recorded at 1:14 AM ET Saturday, per Mansour.

Advertisement

Trading was halted at approximately 2:59 PM ET on Saturday. Kalshi formally closed the contracts at 10:06 PM ET, according to DeFi Rate.

Advertisement

The platform issued two clarifications throughout the day, acknowledging that prior settlement language was “grammatically ambiguous.”

A key dispute emerged over the timing of Khamenei’s confirmed death. The CFTC-filed terms referenced the “last traded price prior to the death.”

However, the market page read “last traded price prior to confirmed reporting of death.” Hours of active trading occurred between his actual death and public confirmation.

Mansour announced that traders who entered positions before Khamenei died would be paid at the last-traded price.

Advertisement

Those who entered after his death would receive full refunds of their cost of entry. He also confirmed Kalshi would reimburse all fees from the market.

Promotional Posts and Prior Settlements Add to the Debate

While reports of Khamenei’s death circulated Saturday morning, Kalshi posted on X: “BREAKING: The odds Ali Khamenei is out as Supreme Leader have surged to 68%.” Mansour reposted the statement.

Amanda Fischer, a former SEC chief of staff now at Better Markets, described it as “more or less offering a proxy market on assassination.”

Critics also pointed to an earlier Kalshi market asking “Who will be at Trump’s inauguration?” Jimmy Carter was listed as an option.

Advertisement

After Carter died in late December 2024, Kalshi settled that contract to “No.” One widely shared post argued: “You settle on death, just not when it makes you money,” directly contrasting the two outcomes.

Mansour defended the Khamenei market as serving a legitimate purpose. He cited geopolitical, economic, and national security factors as reasons for listing the contract.

He also noted that power transitions in autocracies can happen without death, pointing to Venezuela as a recent example. “It just happened in Venezuela,” Mansour wrote on X.

The controversy also comes as six Democratic senators led by Adam Schiff sent a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig. They urged the agency to ban contracts that result in or correlate to an individual’s death.

Advertisement

The Coalition for Prediction Markets responded that “contracts involving death have no place on American exchanges.” The letter set a March 9 deadline for the CFTC to respond.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Stablecoins Do Not Threaten Banking Just Yet: Analyst

Published

on

Stablecoins Do Not Threaten Banking Just Yet: Analyst

The impact of stablecoins on the banking sector appears “limited” at the current phase of the adoption cycle, but banks could face increasing competition and an erosion of market share as the stablecoin sector and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) grow in market capitalization. 

“So far, the use of stablecoins remains limited, but their market capitalization exceeded $300 billion at the end of last year,” Abhi Srivastava, associate vice president of Moody’s Investors Service Digital Economy Group, told Cointelegraph.

The stablecoin market cap has surged past $300 billion. Source: RWA.xyz

The role of stablecoins in payments, cross-border commerce and onchain finance is “expanding,” despite their currently limited role, Srivastava said, adding that existing payment systems in the US are already “fast, low-cost and trusted.” He said:

“For the banking sector, at this stage, disruption risk appears limited. In the near term, US rules that prohibit stablecoins from paying yield mean they are unlikely to replace traditional deposits at scale domestically.”

However, over time, growing adoption of stablecoins and tokenized RWAs, traditional or physical financial assets represented on a blockchain by a token, could place “pressure” on the banking sector, leading to deposit outflows and reduced lending capacity, he said.

Stablecoin regulatory policy has become a hot-button issue among crypto industry executives and those in the banking sector, with fears that yield-bearing stablecoins could erode banking market share proving to be a stumbling block for the CLARITY crypto market structure bill in Congress. 

Advertisement

Related: Stablecoins behave like FX markets as liquidity splits: Eco CEO

CLARITY Act stalled, as banks fight yield-bearing stablecoins

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, also known as the CLARITY Act, is a comprehensive crypto market regulatory framework that establishes an asset taxonomy, regulatory jurisdiction and oversight over the crypto markets.

The CLARITY crypto market structure bill. Source: US Congress

It is now stalled in Congress after a group of crypto industry companies, led by cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, publicly stated opposition to earlier drafts of the bill.

A lack of legal protections for open-source software developers and a prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins were among some of the most contentious issues cited by crypto industry opponents of the legislation.

Several attempts have been made by US lawmakers and the White House to negotiate a bill acceptable to both the crypto industry and the bank lobby.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis said he plans to release an updated draft bill proposal that would be acceptable to both sides; however, the bill has reportedly received pushback, according to Politico, and has yet to be publicly released. 

However, other crypto industry executives and market analysts have warned that if the CLARITY Act fails to pass, it could open the crypto industry up to future regulatory crackdowns by hostile lawmakers and officials.

Magazine: Stablecoins will see explosive growth in 2025 as world embraces asset class