Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

March CPI print already baked into BTC price

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The February CPI data came in broadly as anticipated, reinforcing that higher inflation remains a factor but not a surprise driver for markets. Analysts at 21Shares argued that the macro picture had already priced in the March print, shifting attention to how the Federal Reserve would respond. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported shelter costs rose 0.2% in February, while food climbed 0.4% and energy rose 0.6%; the core measure excluding food and energy rose 0.2%. Those numbers underscore a broad, uneven inflation trajectory. In crypto markets, the Total 3 market indicator — which tracks the broader crypto capitalization outside the two largest assets by market cap — dipped about 1% from an intraday high near $722 billion as traders absorbed the data. For readers tracking the macro narrative, the CPI release keeps the Fed in sharper focus while liquidity remains a driver for risk assets across crypto landscapes. CPI release.

Key takeaways

  • The February CPI print aligned with estimates, reinforcing expectations that inflation momentum remains contained but persistent enough to influence policy signaling.
  • Macro data priced in, shifting attention to the Fed’s reaction function and whether policymakers will “look through” temporary shocks or tighten preemptively.
  • Crypto markets showed resilience, with the broader market excluding the leading two assets dipping about 1% from an intraday peak near $722 billion.
  • Near-term Bitcoin price prospects point to a range around $68,000–$74,000, with a breakout above $75,000 potentially lifting the next leg toward $77,000–$80,000.
  • Market expectations for near-term policy action remain modest, with roughly 0.6% of traders pricing in a rate cut at the March 18 meeting, per CME FedWatch.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH

Market context: The CPI outcome intersected with expectations about the Federal Reserve’s policy path, reinforcing a regime where macro data and liquidity conditions increasingly shape asset allocation across crypto markets. As investors parse the data, attention remains on potential ETF flows, liquidity conditions, and regulatory signals that could influence risk-on appetite in the sector.

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The broader crypto environment continues to respond to macro cues while traders weigh the durability of trend reversals and the potential for regime shifts in monetary policy. The latest price action sits within a framework of cautious optimism, where a measured CPI path and any dovish pivot from the Fed could catalyze incremental risk-taking among digital-asset traders.

Advertisement

Why it matters

The February CPI numbers anchor expectations for the Federal Reserve’s near-term trajectory, with market participants watching for clues about whether policy will remain restrictive or begin to ease as inflation cools. The quote from Stephen Coltman, head of macro at 21Shares, encapsulates the key debate: will the Fed “look through” a temporary inflation shock or tilt hawkish in anticipation of renewed price pressures? His question captures a central tension in macro markets: policymakers must balance the risk of stale data against the risk that over-tightening slows growth more than necessary. The CPI multipliers, the timing of potential rate cuts, and the path of the Fed’s balance sheet all feed directly into how risk assets, including crypto, are repriced in real time.

On the crypto side, Bitcoin and its peers have shown resilience even as macro indicators flash caution. The broader market—measured by Total 3, which excludes the two largest assets by market cap—has managed to hold a high-water mark even as the broader market cooled slightly after the CPI release. The dynamic is clear: when macro momentum remains supportive and liquidity is plentiful, infrastructure developers, traders, and hedgers position themselves for a range of outcomes. The interplay between inflation data, the Fed’s policy stance, and risk sentiment remains the dominant driver of near-term price action in digital assets, even as structural developments in the sector—such as staking, layer-2 scaling, and DeFi adoption—continue to underpin longer-term value propositions.

From a tactical perspective, the crypto narrative often hinges on price catalysts that align with macro cues. If the CPI prints continue to signal softening inflation and the Fed signals a more accommodative stance, the environment could become conducive to a slow but steady reallocation into risk assets, including crypto. Conversely, if the data surprises higher or the Fed remains steadfast in a hawkish posture, liquidity could tighten and risk appetite could wane, pressing prices lower in the near term. In this context, Bitcoin and Ethereum—each with distinct on-ramps to risk markets and different catalysts (security, scalability, staking yields, and institutional adoption)—will be watched closely as leading indicators of broader sentiment in the sector. Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) remains a focal point for investors watching network upgrades and the evolving dynamics of on-chain activity, while Bitcoin continues to serve as the benchmark for institutional sentiment toward digital assets as an entire category.

In the immediate horizon, price action for Bitcoin appears to be constrained within a corridor rather than forming a new uptrend. The market narrative suggests that a sustained break above the $75,000 mark could unlock a phase of consolidation between $75,000 and $80,000, with momentum dependent on macro signals, liquidity availability, and the pace at which policy expectations evolve. Historical patterns show that geopolitical shocks can trigger sharp but often brief rebounds in risk assets, including crypto, as investors reposition portfolios and seek hedges or uncorrelated stores of value. A potential easing cycle in 2026, if it materializes, could further accelerate any durable upside by reducing discount rates on future cash flows and encouraging risk-taking among diversified portfolios. For now, near-term traders appear to be watching for a decisive move beyond key resistance levels while staying mindful of the macro backdrop.

Advertisement

The market’s next phase will hinge on the March 18 FOMC decision and the accompanying dot plot. While the probability of a rate cut is currently modest, any shift in messaging toward a more permissive stance would likely be interpreted as a positive catalyst for both traditional and crypto markets. Investors should remain alert to any new inflation data and to updates in regulatory and ETF-related developments that could alter risk appetite and liquidity dynamics in this evolving space.

What to watch next

  • March 18: Federal Reserve meeting outcomes and the accompanying policy statement; assess shifts in the policy stance and the dot plot.
  • Bitcoin price signal: monitor whether the price sustains a break above $75,000 and whether it can push into the $77,000–$80,000 range.
  • Evidence of sustained liquidity: track ETF inflows, macro liquidity conditions, and funding rates that could affect risk assets including crypto.
  • Geopolitical or macro shocks: observe whether external events drive a rapid re-pricing across crypto markets and whether they catalyze follow-on rebounds.
  • Regulatory and on-chain developments: continue to watch network upgrades, staking dynamics, and DeFi activity that influence long-term value propositions.

Sources & verification

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI February release and sector breakdowns (shelter, food, energy, core).
  • Comments from Stephen Coltman, head of macro at 21Shares, regarding the Fed reaction function and policy signaling.
  • CME FedWatch tool for probability of near-term rate cuts and market expectations at the March 18 meeting.
  • Price charts and intraday levels referenced via TradingView and reputable price-tracking data for Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Markets digest CPI data as Fed policy looms and Bitcoin eyes a breakout

The February CPI print arrived in line with expectations, reinforcing the view that inflation momentum remains a factor but not a surprise driver for markets. In a briefing that highlighted the breadth of price pressures, shelter costs rose 0.2% in February, food increased 0.4%, and energy advanced 0.6%. The core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy components, rose 0.2%. These figures, released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, reflect a broad inflation path with pockets of resilience in housing and energy alongside more modest gains in some other sectors. Analysts at 21Shares noted that the print is now part of the pricing backdrop for the March data, complicating the path for policy but not delivering an outsized surprise that would upend markets. The crypto space, meanwhile, showed a measure of resilience as Total 3 — the broader market value outside the leading two assets — retraced roughly 1% from an intraday high near $722 billion, underscoring that liquidity and risk sentiment remain critical levers for digital assets in the near term. CPI release.

Market observers at 21Shares framed the data through the lens of the Fed’s reaction function. Stephen Coltman asked whether policymakers will “look through” temporary inflation shocks or tilt hawkish as a precaution, pointing to a central question as officials balance the persistence of price pressures against the evidence of cooling momentum. The answer, to many, will hinge on how the Fed interprets the trajectory of inflation and how aggressively it views the risk of a renewed uptick. The outcome will shape not just traditional asset classes but the risk appetite that propels crypto markets higher or lower in the weeks to come.

Looking at the near-term price action, Bitcoin’s path remains tethered to momentum around major psychological thresholds and resistance levels. In a scenario where the price breaks decisively above the $75,000 mark, bulls could push into a consolidation zone roughly between $75,000 and $80,000, with the potential to test the upper end of that band depending on macro cues and liquidity conditions. If, instead, the market fails to clear that resistance, the asset could consolidate in the lower to mid-$70,000s as traders await clearer signals from policymakers and the broader economy. The relevance of macro factors to crypto is a reminder that while the technology and use cases continue to evolve, the sector remains highly sensitive to the policy and liquidity backdrop that governs all risk assets.

Beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum’s ongoing developments around staking dynamics, network upgrades, and layer-2 scaling will continue to influence demand and on-chain activity. These structural factors can interact with macro signals to shape price trajectories over a longer horizon, even as the near term remains dominated by inflation data and monetary policy expectations. In sum, the CPI data reinforces a delicate balance: a still-elevated inflation backdrop paired with a potential shift in policy signaling could, if realized, unlock new phases of risk-on behavior that bolster crypto markets—provided liquidity holds and macro momentum remains supportive.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Circle faces backlash after $285 million Drift hack

Published

on

Circle (CRCL) may rally another 60% driven by stablecoin adoption, AI agentic finance: Bernstein

After the $285 million Drift hack, the focus is shifting to Circle (CRCL) and whether it could have done more to stop the money.

The attacker siphoned off roughly $71 million in USDC as part of the exploit Wednesday, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield. After converting most of the rest of the stolen assets to USDC, the hacker used Circle’s cross-chain transfer protocol, CCTP, to bridge about $232 million in USDC from Solana to Ethereum, making recovery efforts more difficult.

That movement has drawn criticism from parts of the crypto community, including prominent blockchain investigator ZachXBT, who argued Circle could have acted faster to limit the damage.

“Why should crypto businesses continue to build on Circle when a project with 9 fig[ure] TVL [total value locked] could not get support during a major incident?,” he said in an X post following the attack.

Advertisement

To freeze or not to freeze

The company had tools at its disposal, ZachXBT pointed out. Under its own terms, Circle reserves the right to blacklist addresses and freeze USDC tied to any suspicious activity.

Preemptively freezing wallets linked to the exploit could have slowed or stopped the attacker’s ability to move funds, one stablecoin infrastructure firm founder told CoinDesk.

However, acting without a court order or law enforcement request might expose Circle to legal risk, the person added.

Salman Banei, general counsel of tokenized asset network Plume, said freezing assets without formal authorization could expose issuers to liability if done incorrectly. He argued regulators should address that legal gap.

Advertisement

“Lawmakers should provide a safe harbor from civil liability if digital asset issuers freeze assets when, in their reasonable judgment, there is strong basis to believe that illicit transfers have occurred,” Banei said.

That constraint was central to the company’s response.

“Circle is a regulated company that complies with sanctions, law enforcement orders, and court-mandated requirements,” a spokesperson said in an email to CoinDesk. “We freeze assets when legally required, consistent with the rule of law and with strong protections for user rights and privacy.”

‘Gray zone’

The episode highlights a deeper tension that’s drawing increasing scrutiny as stablecoins grow.

Advertisement

Tokens like USDC are becoming a core part of global money flows, especially for cross-border payments and trading. At the same time, they are also used in illicit activity, putting issuers under pressure to act quickly when things go wrong.

According to TRM Labs, roughly $141 billion in stablecoin transactions in 2025 were linked to illicit activity, including sanctions evasion and money laundering.

Blockchain security firms pointed to North Korean hackers as likely being behind the Drift exploit.

Stablecoins issued by centralized, regulated entities like Circle’s USDC are designed to be programmable and controllable, a feature that can help stop illicit flows but could also raise concerns about overreach and due process.

Advertisement

In the Drift exploit’s case, the situation isn’t that clear-cut, said Ben Levit, founder and CEO of stablecoin ratings agency Bluechip.

“I think people are framing this too simplistically as ‘Circle should’ve frozen,’” he said. “This wasn’t a clean hack, it was more of a market/oracle exploit, which puts it in a gray zone.”

“So any action by Circle becomes a judgment call, not just a compliance decision,” he added.

To him, the bigger issue is consistency. “USDC can’t be positioned as neutral infrastructure while also allowing discretionary intervention without clear rules,” Levit said. “Markets can handle strict policies or no intervention, but ambiguity is much harder to price.”

Advertisement

That leaves issuers in a difficult position. Moving too slowly risks criticism that they are enabling bad actors, while acting too quickly without legal backing raises concerns about overreach.

And in fast-moving exploits, that trade-off becomes especially stark, with the window to act often measured in minutes rather than weeks or months of legal processes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Community Banks Push Back on Coinbase Trust Charter Approval

Published

on

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States

The Independent Community Bankers of America has opposed the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) conditional approval of Coinbase’s national trust bank charter, warning the application falls short of regulatory standards and could pose risks to consumers and the financial system.

On Thursday, ICBA said Coinbase’s application shows deficiencies in risk controls, profitability and resolution planning, and argued the OCC lacks statutory authority to expand trust powers for crypto-related activities without applying the full set of banking regulations.

The group said the decision reflects a broader trend of nonbank entities seeking access to the benefits of bank charters without meeting the same regulatory requirements. It wrote:

The sudden influx of applications demonstrates nonbank entities are seeking the benefits of a US bank charter without satisfying the full scope of US bank regulations.

Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund also criticized the decision, warning the approval departs from longstanding banking law and could expose the financial system to risks tied to crypto market volatility, fraud and money laundering.

Advertisement

The objections follows the OCC’s conditional approval on Thursday of Coinbase’s application to establish a national trust bank, after six months of review by the US regulator.

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States
Industry opposition to OCC’s Coinbase approval is growing. Source: Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund

Coinbase released a statement on Thursday saying the charter would bring its custody and market infrastructure business under federal oversight, emphasizing that it does not plan to hold customer deposits or engage in fractional reserve lending, and adding that “the right path forward for crypto is through the system — not around it.”

Related: Crypto awareness tops 80% among young people in UK: Coinbase survey

Stablecoin yield dispute stalls crypto market structure bill

The opposition is part of a broader dispute between banking groups and crypto companies over the role of digital assets in the financial system, particularly around stablecoins and yield-bearing products.

In January, CEO of Bank of America Brian Moynihan warned that allowing stablecoin issuers to offer interest could draw as much as $6 trillion in deposits out of the banking system, reducing lending capacity and pushing borrowing costs higher.

Advertisement

Industry groups such as the Bank Policy Institute have also raised similar concerns in letters to lawmakers, arguing that regulatory gaps could allow yield-bearing stablecoin products to bypass restrictions and disrupt traditional credit channels.

The debate is currently playing out in Washington, where Coinbase is engaged in policy discussions over the US Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a bill aimed at establishing federal rules for crypto oversight.

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States
Source: Brian Armstrong

While Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in January that the company could not support the legislation as drafted due to restrictions on stablecoin rewards, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said on Thursday that lawmakers are nearing agreement on core elements of the bill, though the yield issue remains a key sticking point.

The dispute has delayed a Senate Banking Committee markup, a required step before the bill can advance to a full Senate vote, leaving broader efforts to establish a federal framework for digital assets unresolved.

Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work

Advertisement