Connect with us

Crypto World

Minnesota Moves to Fully Ban Crypto ATMs With New 2025 House Bill

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Minnesota HF3642 would make it illegal for anyone to place or operate a crypto ATM in the state.
  • The bill repeals Sections 53B.70–53B.75, erasing all existing kiosk licensing and compliance rules.
  • New customers currently get full fraud refunds within 72 hours — a protection the ban would eliminate.
  • Minnesota could become one of the first U.S. states to outright ban virtual currency kiosks entirely.

Virtual currency kiosks in Minnesota face a complete ban under proposed legislation introduced in the 2025–2026 session.

House File 3642 targets all crypto ATM operations in the state. The bill would prohibit any person from placing or operating a virtual currency kiosk in Minnesota.

It also seeks to repeal existing statutes that currently govern kiosk licensing, disclosures, transaction limits, refunds, and compliance requirements. This move marks a dramatic policy shift for the state.

What the Bill Proposes

Minnesota HF3642 introduces a straightforward and sweeping prohibition. Under the proposed Section 53B.691, no person may place or operate a virtual currency kiosk anywhere in Minnesota. The language of the bill leaves no room for exceptions or conditional approvals.

The bill also adds a new subdivision to Section 53B.69 to define terms specifically for the prohibition. This addition provides the legal framework needed to enforce the new ban effectively. It connects existing definitions in state law to the incoming restriction.

Advertisement

Beyond the ban itself, the legislation proposes a full repealer of Sections 53B.70 through 53B.75. These sections currently regulate kiosk operators through licensing, consumer disclosures, and transaction limits.

Their removal would erase the entire regulatory structure that governs crypto ATMs in the state today.

What Current Law Requires of Kiosk Operators

Under existing Minnesota statutes, virtual currency kiosk operators must follow strict disclosure rules. Before any transaction, operators must display all material risks on the kiosk screen for the customer to acknowledge.

These include warnings about price volatility, irreversible transactions, and potential fraud schemes.

Advertisement

Current law also requires operators to display a bold warning about scams. The warning specifically addresses fraudsters impersonating loved ones or government officials. It advises consumers that losses from fraudulent transactions cannot be recovered.

Transaction limits are also part of the existing framework. New customers face a maximum daily transaction limit of $2,000.

Existing customers, defined as those who have transacted for more than 72 hours, are subject to limits set by individual operators in line with federal law.

Refund Rules and Consumer Protections at Stake

Minnesota’s current law offers a refund pathway for new customers who fall victim to fraud. Under Section 53B.75, operators must refund the full transaction amount if a new customer was fraudulently induced.

Advertisement

The customer must contact the operator and a government or law enforcement agency within 14 days.

This protection applies strictly within the 72-hour new customer window. After that period, a customer transitions to “existing customer” status under Section 53B.69. At that point, the full refund obligation no longer applies.

If HF3642 passes, all of these consumer protections would be repealed along with the ban. There would be no licensed operators left to hold accountable, and no regulatory structure to enforce compliance.

Consumers who previously relied on these protections would lose that safety net entirely.

Advertisement

Industry and Regulatory Outlook

The bill’s passage would make Minnesota one of the few states to outright ban crypto ATM operations. Most states have moved toward regulation rather than prohibition. The trend across the country has been to tighten oversight, not eliminate it entirely.

For operators currently licensed in Minnesota, the bill represents a direct threat to existing business models. Many operators have invested in compliance infrastructure to meet the state’s existing requirements. A full ban would render that investment worthless.

The bill is now in the legislative process and has not yet been signed into law. Stakeholders across the crypto industry are expected to monitor its progress closely.

Its outcome could influence how other states approach virtual currency kiosk legislation going forward.

Advertisement

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

South Korea’s $40B Leverage Bet on U.S. Tech Is Flashing Red

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • Korean retail poured $40B into U.S. leveraged ETFs in 2025, with $7B flowing in December alone.
  • South Korean regulators imposed training rules to limit retail access to 2x and 3x offshore ETFs.
  • The KOSPI has rallied 177% over the past year, driven largely by semiconductor stocks.
  • Volatility is rising at market highs, signaling stretched positioning through aggressive leverage.

South Korea’s stock market is sitting on a $40 billion leverage position in U.S. tech assets. The KOSPI has surged 177% over the past year. 

On the surface, semiconductor giants Samsung and SK Hynix drove most of that momentum. But a deeper look reveals a retail-driven leverage story that regulators are already scrambling to address.

Korean Retail Floods U.S. Leveraged ETFs at Historic Pace

Korean retail investors allocated $40 billion into U.S. leveraged ETFs throughout 2025. Of that total, $7 billion entered in December alone. 

The pace alarmed South Korean financial regulators enough to intervene directly. Authorities imposed mandatory training and mock trading requirements to restrict retail access to these instruments.

The same investor class that fueled the crypto “Kimchi Premium” has rotated into equities. Their appetite for high-risk, high-return products has not cooled. They simply shifted the arena. The move has concentrated enormous exposure into 2x and 3x U.S. tech ETFs.

Advertisement

This is not a niche segment of the market. Korean retail is widely recognized as one of the most active investor bases globally. Their capital flows carry real weight in offshore markets. At $40 billion, their U.S. ETF positioning is now systemically relevant.

The regulatory response confirms the scale of concern. Training requirements and mock trading rules are unusual interventions. They signal that authorities view the current behavior as a structural risk, not just speculative excess.

Rising Volatility at Market Highs Signals Stretched Positioning

Volatility is climbing even as the KOSPI holds near euphoric highs. That combination is historically unusual. Volatility typically spikes during market bottoms, not tops. When it rises alongside highs, it often reflects aggressive call buying and overextended leverage.

According to data flagged by Bull Theory, the current setup involves three overlapping risk layers. A 177% domestic rally almost entirely dependent on semiconductors. 

Advertisement

Forty billion dollars parked in highly leveraged offshore tech products. And volatility expanding while prices stay elevated.

If U.S. tech corrects, Korean retail faces pressure on both fronts simultaneously. Their KOSPI holdings decline on weaker chip export expectations. Their leveraged U.S. ETF positions amplify losses in real time. The two portfolios move against them at once.

Seoul’s market is now directly tethered to Nasdaq price action, according to Bull Theory’s analysis. Korean retail has become a significant marginal buyer of high-beta U.S. tech. That linkage runs both ways.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Mt. Gox’s Karpeles Floats Hard Fork Recover $5.2B Bitcoin

Published

on

Mt. Gox's Karpeles Floats Hard Fork Recover $5.2B Bitcoin

Mark Karpelès, the former CEO of Mt. Gox, is calling on community support for a proposal to recover more than $5.2 billion stolen from his Bitcoin exchange more than a decade ago.

On Friday, Karpelès submitted a proposal on GitHub to add a consensus rule that would allow the 79,956 Bitcoin hacked from Mt. Gox (currently sitting in a single wallet) to be moved to a recovery address without the original private key. 

“These coins have not moved in over 15 years. They are among the most well-known and publicly tracked UTXOs in Bitcoin’s history,” he wrote. 

Source: Jameson Lopp

Karpelès said that with Mt. Gox trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi already overseeing distributions to creditors, if the coins were recoverable, the existing legal and logistical framework would distribute them to their rightful owners. 

“I want to be upfront: this is a hard fork. It makes a previously invalid transaction valid. All nodes would need to upgrade before the activation height. I’m not trying to disguise that fact or sneak it through as something else,” he added.

Advertisement

However, Karpelès said the proposal wasn’t intended to bypass the Bitcoin development process; instead, it was an attempt to start a discussion with the Bitcoin community. 

Source: Luke Dashjr

“The MtGox trustee has declined to pursue on-chain recovery, citing the uncertainty of whether such a consensus change would ever be adopted,” he said. 

“This creates a deadlock: the trustee won’t act without certainty, and the community can’t evaluate the idea without a concrete proposal. This patch breaks that deadlock by providing something concrete to discuss.”

Bitcoin immutability at risk, say critics 

Karpelès’ proposal saw strong opposition on the online forum Bitcointalk, with most arguing that it would set a bad precedent for Bitcoin, a decentralized cryptocurrency intended to be irreversible and immutable. 

“Each time a hack incident [happens], someone will call for another new consensus rule to recover stolen funds. This will destroy the bitcoin concept in full,” wrote “coupable,” who has been a member of the forum since 2015. 

Advertisement

“Bitcoin should be independent from what Law Enforcement decides in any [jurisdictions],” said another forum member known as “PrivacyG.”