Crypto World
Morgan Stanley plans to offer in-house Bitcoin custody, trading, and yield products
Banking giant Morgan Stanley has plans to offer multiple Bitcoin-related product offerings in the future, according to its digital assets strategy head Amy Oldenburg.
Summary
- Morgan Stanley is weighing plans to let clients custody and trade Bitcoin directly on its platform, with yield and lending services also under discussion.
- The bank plans to build its Bitcoin infrastructure in-house to meet reliability standards.
Morgan Stanley currently manages roughly $9 trillion worth of assets, and it will consider giving its clients the option to custody and trade Bitcoin directly on its platform, Amy Oldenburg said during her appearance at the Bitcoin for Corporations conference in Las Vegas on Feb. 26.
Regarding Bitcoin-based yield and lending services, she said that it was a “natural part of the roadmap to continue to explore,” but added that the firm is still “early in the journey.”
However, the banking giant plans to develop its Bitcoin infrastructure from scratch through an in-house offering to ensure reliability and control over the technology stack.
“People expect Morgan Stanley—they trust our brand—to be no-fail. When you sit in that position, you have a significant responsibility to your clients to make sure that you’re delivering that in any level of technology,” Oldenburg said.
Further, she confirmed that the bank already has “a considerable number” of cryptocurrencies that its clients hold off-platform, but added that she does not expect all of those assets to flow into Morgan Stanley’s custody solutions, noting that self-custody remains a natural part of the space, particularly within the Bitcoin community.
Morgan Stanley was once cautious toward crypto-related offerings, but the Wall Street giant has gradually warmed up to the space under a more favourable regulatory climate following the election of United States President Donald Trump.
Last year, analysts at the firm increased their recommended crypto allocation from 1% to 2% for income and balanced growth portfolios to up to 4% for strategies focused on what they described as “opportunistic growth.” They have also called Bitcoin “akin to digital gold,” describing it as a scarce asset that can potentially offer long term value within diversified portfolios.
The bank has also confirmed plans to offer retail trading services for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana through its E*Trade app as part of its broader digital asset push. Last month, it filed three separate crypto fund registrations tied to these assets.
Crypto World
Former Mt. Gox CEO Proposes Hardfork to Recover $5.2B in BTC
Mark Karpelès, the former chief executive of the defunct Mt. Gox exchange, is urging the Bitcoin community to consider a network hard fork designed to retrieve nearly 80,000 Bitcoin linked to the platform’s historic hack.
Key Takeaways:
- Mark Karpelès proposed a Bitcoin hard fork to recover 79,956 BTC worth about $5.2B from the Mt. Gox hack.
- The plan would allow the coins to move without the original private key and potentially repay creditors.
- The proposal has triggered strong opposition over fears it would weaken Bitcoin’s immutability.
In a proposal published Friday on GitHub, Karpelès outlined a change to Bitcoin’s consensus rules that would allow 79,956 BTC, currently held in a single wallet, to be transferred to a designated recovery address without access to the original private key.
At current prices, the holdings are worth more than $5.2 billion.
Dormant Mt. Gox Bitcoin Unmoved for 15 Years
“These coins have not moved in over 15 years,” Karpelès wrote, describing the funds as among the most widely monitored unspent transaction outputs in Bitcoin’s history.
He acknowledged the magnitude of the suggestion, stating plainly that the change would require a hard fork.
Such an update would make a transaction previously rejected by the network valid and would require node operators to upgrade their software before a specified activation block.
Karpelès said the idea is not an attempt to sidestep Bitcoin’s development process but rather to trigger discussion around a long-standing impasse.
According to him, bankruptcy trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi has declined to pursue on-chain recovery because there is no certainty the community would support it.
“That creates a deadlock,” Karpelès wrote. “The trustee won’t act without confidence, and the community can’t evaluate the idea without a concrete proposal.”
If the coins were recovered, the existing bankruptcy framework could distribute them to creditors already receiving repayments from the estate.
The suggestion has sparked sharp backlash across Bitcoin forums. Critics argue that altering consensus rules to reclaim stolen funds would undermine Bitcoin’s defining characteristic: irreversible transactions.
“Every time a hack happens, someone will want another special rule,” one Bitcointalk member wrote, warning it would erode trust in the system.
Another user argued Bitcoin should remain independent from legal or government determinations in any jurisdiction.
Karpelès Says Mt. Gox Recovery Case Is Unique as Creditors Back Proposal
Karpelès countered that the case is unique because both law enforcement and much of the community agree the wallet contains stolen Mt. Gox funds.
Some individuals claiming creditor status expressed support, saying any recovery could restore losses from the 2014 collapse.
Mt. Gox once processed roughly 70% of global Bitcoin trading between 2010 and 2014.
The exchange unraveled after a massive theft went undetected for years, ultimately losing about 750,000 customer Bitcoin and forcing a bankruptcy filing in Tokyo.
More than a decade later, the incident remains one of the largest failures in crypto history.
In May last year, Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive said it plans to acquire 75,000 Bitcoin, valued slightly over $8 billion, from claims related to the defunct Mt. Gox exchange bankruptcy.
Strive noted that the strategy is intended to purchase Bitcoin at a discount price.
The post Former Mt. Gox CEO Proposes Hardfork to Recover $5.2B in BTC appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
Solana Price Analysis: SOL Slides 5% Amid Middle East Tensions – Critical Support Zones Ahead
TLDR
- SOL has declined 72% from its record high of $295 and is currently valued at approximately $78
- The token’s spot ETF products have experienced only $11.3M in total outflows, significantly less than Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs that recorded four straight months of withdrawals
- Solana dominated decentralized exchange activity with $108 billion in 30-day volume, surpassing Ethereum’s $63.7 billion
- Technical analysts highlight critical support zones at $50, $22, and $10 derived from Parallel Channel formations
- Military strikes involving Israel and Iran sparked widespread cryptocurrency liquidations, driving Bitcoin near $60,000 and weighing heavily on alternative tokens including SOL
The Solana network’s native token SOL is presently valued at $78, representing a 72% decline from its peak valuation of $295. This downturn coincides with a comprehensive cryptocurrency market correction intensified by escalating geopolitical instability on February 28, 2026.

Saturday morning witnessed Israeli forces conducting military operations against Iranian targets. Intelligence from AP sources confirms American involvement in the coordinated assault. Bitcoin experienced a sharp 5% correction within minutes, approaching the $60,000 threshold, with the resulting market panic cascading into alternative cryptocurrencies like SOL.
While price action reflects bearish sentiment, Solana’s fundamental network metrics demonstrate continued robustness. The blockchain recorded $108 billion in decentralized exchange volume throughout the previous 30-day period, outpacing Ethereum’s $63.7 billion and Base’s $31.48 billion by significant margins.
During the past 24-hour cycle, Solana applications produced $3.1 million in protocol revenue compared to Ethereum’s $2.95 million. The network maintained 2.17 million active wallet addresses, substantially exceeding Ethereum’s 682,236 active participants.
Solana’s real-world asset tokenization ecosystem has achieved a new milestone valuation of $1.71 billion, marking a 45% increase over the past month.
SOL ETF Flows Hold Steady
Exchange-traded fund products for SOL debuted in late October 2025, attracting more than $100 million in average daily net inflows throughout their initial five-week period. Weekly capital inflows have subsequently moderated to the $20–$25 million range as token valuations contracted.

Total accumulated outflows throughout the four-month price correction measure merely $11.3 million across a two-week span. Comparatively, Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF products documented four consecutive months of net negative flows during this identical timeframe.
Solana is presently trading substantially beneath the $188 valuation observed during its ETF product introduction.
Key Support Levels to Watch
Market analyst Ali Martinez has identified a Parallel Channel formation developing on SOL’s weekly timeframe chart. This technical pattern suggests potential support zones positioned at $50.22, $22.47, and $9.98.
Analyst Crypto Scient has pinpointed two supplementary areas of interest. The initial zone corresponds to the 0.75 Fibonacci retracement level spanning $60 to $70. The secondary area represents a weekly demand fair value gap situated between $22 and $29.
UTXO analytics from Glassnode indicate that over 6% of circulating SOL supply last transacted within the current valuation range. The subsequent significant supply concentration, exceeding 3%, exists between $20 and $30.
SOL continues trading beneath the weekly resistance threshold of $120. The $51 to $80 range on weekly charts has undergone testing and corresponds with the retracement zone under analyst scrutiny.
As of February 28, 2026, SOL maintained a $78 valuation as cryptocurrency markets absorbed developments from the Israel-Iran military engagement.
Crypto World
Pentagon Switches AI Partners: OpenAI Replaces Anthropic After Security Dispute
Key Takeaways
- Federal authorities ordered a complete halt to Anthropic’s AI technology across all government agencies, citing national security supply-chain concerns.
- Within hours of Anthropic’s dismissal, OpenAI secured a Pentagon agreement to integrate its AI systems into classified military infrastructure.
- The $200 million Pentagon arrangement with Anthropic fell apart when the company declined to permit its technology for autonomous weaponry or widespread domestic monitoring.
- While OpenAI claims its agreement contains identical usage limitations that Anthropic demanded, skeptics wonder if the company will maintain those boundaries.
- Anthropic plans legal action against the supply-chain risk classification, arguing the decision lacks legal foundation.
On Friday, the United States government severed its partnership with Anthropic and classified the AI firm as a supply-chain security threat. Shortly afterward, competing company OpenAI revealed a fresh agreement to integrate its artificial intelligence technology into the Pentagon’s secure networks.
President Donald Trump mandated that all federal departments cease operations with Anthropic’s technology effective immediately. Organizations currently utilizing the company’s Claude AI systems have six months to complete their migration to alternative solutions.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared via X that Anthropic represents a “Supply-Chain Risk to National Security.” This classification typically applies to entities from hostile nations such as China.
The decision carries implications beyond government contracts. Organizations partnering with the Pentagon may face requirements to demonstrate they’ve eliminated Claude from their operations entirely. Major corporations including Nvidia, Amazon, and Google count themselves among Anthropic’s investors and collaborators.
Anthropic had achieved a milestone as the initial AI laboratory to integrate its models within the Pentagon’s secure computing environment. The July agreement carried a potential value reaching $200 million.
Negotiations collapsed when Anthropic declined to ensure its artificial intelligence would remain accessible for all legally permissible military applications. The company established firm boundaries against autonomous weaponry and large-scale domestic monitoring programs.
Pentagon officials indicated Anthropic should rely on military adherence to existing legal frameworks. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei stated Thursday that his organization “cannot in good conscience” accept such terms.
OpenAI Secures Pentagon Partnership
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman revealed the Pentagon arrangement late Friday through X. He indicated the contract incorporates identical restrictions regarding mass surveillance and autonomous weapons systems that Anthropic had sought.
Altman further stated OpenAI requested the administration extend comparable contract conditions to all artificial intelligence providers. Elon Musk’s xAI had previously received military authorization for deployment in classified environments.
OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his spouse contributed $25 million to a Trump-aligned political action committee during the previous year. They continue financial support for Trump’s artificial intelligence initiatives in forthcoming electoral contests.
Anthropic Prepares Legal Response
Anthropic expressed being “deeply saddened” by the classification and intends to pursue judicial remedies. The organization characterized the determination as “legally unsound” and warned it establishes a troubling precedent for American technology companies engaging in government negotiations.
The General Services Administration announced Anthropic’s removal from its catalog of approved products available to government entities.
Certain observers expressed criticism toward OpenAI’s actions. Democratic figure Christopher Hale announced on X his cancellation of ChatGPT membership in favor of switching to Claude Pro Max.
Anthropic emerged in 2021 when researchers departed OpenAI due to apprehensions about diminishing safety priorities. Both organizations have secured funding in the tens of billions recently and are evaluating potential public stock offerings.
The controversy also referenced a particular event. Following Claude’s deployment during a Venezuela operation in January, an Anthropic staff member contacted a Palantir associate seeking clarification on the technology’s application. Pentagon leadership interpreted this communication as inappropriate interference.
Anthropic maintained the conversation represented standard technical coordination between collaborative partners.
Crypto World
BTC Plunges Below $64K as US-Israel Military Action Against Iran Triggers Crypto Selloff
TLDR
- BTC plummeted almost 5% toward $63,000 following coordinated US-Israeli military operations against Iranian targets
- The cryptocurrency reached its weakest level since the February 5 market crash when BTC momentarily fell under $60,000
- Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz announced a nationwide state of emergency throughout the country
- BTC’s continuous trading schedule positions it as an immediate outlet for risk aversion when traditional markets remain closed
- Market participants dumped bitcoin as it represented one of the only major liquid assets accessible during weekend hours
The world’s leading cryptocurrency experienced a dramatic decline on Saturday, February 28, 2026, plunging toward $63,000 following military strikes executed by the United States and Israel against Iran.

The digital asset shed nearly 5% of its value within mere minutes, representing a significant blow to the cryptocurrency market.
The selloff pushed bitcoin to levels not witnessed since February 5, when the digital currency momentarily traded beneath the $60,000 threshold.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced a comprehensive state of emergency covering the entire nation immediately following the commencement of the military operations.
According to The Wall Street Journal, a U.S. official verified American involvement in the coordinated attacks.
Reuters reported that Israeli officials characterized the military action as a “preemptive strike,” citing statements from the nation’s defense leadership.
Why Bitcoin Sold Off First
Unlike traditional equity and bond markets that close for weekends, Bitcoin operates continuously without interruption, 24 hours daily, seven days weekly.
This constant availability positions it as among the few substantial, liquid assets accessible for traders to offload during heightened risk periods outside conventional market operating hours.
This behavior represents a recurring phenomenon. BTC frequently experiences rapid selloffs during geopolitical crises, often rebounding once conventional markets resume trading.
“Bitcoin just dropped off a cliff,” one market observer shared on X, further predicting that “Monday will be a bloodbath in the market.”
Geopolitical Context
The military operations arrive after several weeks of escalating U.S. military presence and unsuccessful nuclear discussions with Iranian leadership.
Market analysts had previously been examining potential implications of Iranian conflict for bitcoin, precious metals, and equity markets.
The military action heightens the possibility of expanded regional warfare in one of the globe’s most economically critical regions.
In recent months, bitcoin’s price movement has diverged from gold, challenging its narrative as a safe-haven or “digital gold” investment vehicle.
As of Saturday morning hours, bitcoin was changing hands near $63,000, with additional market volatility anticipated when conventional financial markets resume operations Monday.
Crypto World
Altcoins Bleed Out After Trump Confirms Attacks Against Iran, BTC Down to $63K: Weekend Watch
KCS, STABLE, and PIPPIN are today’s top losers after the latest attacks.
Bitcoin’s price moves took another turn for the worse in the past few hours after Israel attacked Iran, and then US President Trump confirmed his country was also involved.
Numerous altcoins have bled out heavily, while Binance Coin has taken advantage and surpassed XRP in terms of market cap.
BTC Dumps Again
It was already a highly volatile trading week for the primary cryptocurrency as the bears seemed to be in full control by Tuesday. At the time, they pushed the asset south to a multi-week low of $62,500. However, bitcoin rebounded almost immediately and skyrocketed by several grand to $70,000 on Wednesday.
Many analysts speculated whether this was a typical dead-cat bounce, which turned out to be the case. At first, BTC slipped to around $68,000, where it spent most of Thursday and Friday. However, the situation worsened once again on Saturday morning when Israel launched a “preemptive” attack against Iran and issued a state of emergency.
In minutes, BTC plunged to under $62,800 before it recovered some ground to $63,400 as of press time. US President Donald Trump confirmed that the US was also involved in the attacks, and more volatility is expected later today as the situation unravels.
As of now, bitcoin’s market cap has slid to $1.275 trillion on CG, while its dominance over the alts is below 56%.
Alts Bleed
The graph below will show the painful reality in the altcoin space, in which almost all assets are deep in the red. ETH has plunged by $200 in the past few days to $1,850. XRP was surpassed by BNB after a 9% drop, while SOL has slumped by double digits to under $80.
ADA, HYPE, BCH, DOGE, CC, LINK, and XLM have plummeted hard as well. Declines of up to 20% are evident from KCS, PIPPIN, and STABLE, while stablecoins linked to gold are in the green.
The total crypto market cap has erased over $100 billion in the past day or so and is deep below $2.3 trillion on CG.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
Crypto World
US, Israel Move on Iran Forces Bitcoin Toward $63,000
Bitcoin faced geopolitical instability alone as a weekend move on Iran saw traditional markets closed, with key support still holding.
Bitcoin (BTC) daily losses neared 4% on Saturday as the US and Israel announced a military operation in Iran.
Key points:
-
Bitcoin targets $63,000 as US President Donald Trump confirms a major bombing campaign inside Iran.
-
Trump highlights nuclear infrastructure as a key target of the joint raids with Israel.
-
Crypto markets react alone with TradFi trading suspended until futures return.
Trump tells Iranians: “Take over your government”
Data from TradingView showed BTC price action testing $63,000 as crypto markets reacted to the weekend’s events.

In a video address, US President Donald Trump said that the goal of the move was to target Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, but finished by calling on Iranians to take control of the incumbent government.
“When we are finished, take over your government; it will be yours to take,” he said.
“This will be, probably, your only chance for generations. For many years, you have asked for America’s help, but you never got it.”
With US stock market futures yet to open, crypto was alone in deciding on how to react to fresh geopolitical instability.
Data from CoinGlass showed liquidations passing $250 million in the four hours to the time of writing.

“The US and Israel now appear to be at war with Iran for the second time in 8 months,” trading resource The Kobeissi Letter wrote in a response on X.
Kobeissi referenced a previous Iran offensive in 2025 — an event that sparked an immediate, volatile reaction across crypto and risk assets.
Bitcoin reacts to familiar cues
With core support levels still holding for BTC/USD, the fresh escalation comes at a key time for traders as the final hours tick down to the February monthly close.
Related: Price predictions 2/27: BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, SOL, DOGE, BCH, ADA, HYPE, LINK
As Cointelegraph reported, the pair is now down roughly as much as in February 2025, and due to seal its fifth consecutive month of losses — something not encountered in seven years.
Hot US inflation data added another headwind for Bitcoin bulls on Friday, after they tried and failed to reclaim key support levels closer to $70,000.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
Crypto World
Tehran Under Fire: Breaking Down the Joint Israel-US Military Operation
Quick Summary
- On February 28, 2026, Israel executed a coordinated “pre-emptive strike” against Iran alongside US forces
- President Trump announced “major combat operations” were active in Iranian territory
- Iranian authorities shut down national airspace and vowed “crushing” retaliation
- Supreme Leader Khamenei was evacuated from Tehran to an undisclosed secure facility
- Washington simultaneously added Iran to its “state sponsor of wrongful detention” list
On February 28, 2026, Israel executed a coordinated pre-emptive military operation against Iranian targets. A senior Israeli defence official speaking to Reuters confirmed the attack was synchronized with United States forces.
President Donald Trump publicly acknowledged American involvement, stating the United States had initiated “major combat operations” on Iranian soil. CNN’s reporting indicated the strikes concentrated on Iranian military installations.
According to the Israeli defence official, operational planning extended across several months. The specific execution date was finalized weeks before the actual strikes commenced.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz made the official strike announcement while simultaneously implementing emergency protocols throughout Israel. Officials cited expectations of Iranian counter-strikes as justification for the emergency measures.
Around 08:15 local time, warning sirens activated throughout Israeli territory. Citizens received emergency mobile notifications characterizing the situation as an “extremely serious” security threat.
Journalists from AFP stationed in Tehran documented two powerful explosions. Dense smoke columns rose from central and eastern sections of Iran’s capital city.
According to Iran’s Fars news agency, the “type of explosions suggests a missile attack.” Iranian officials have not yet released comprehensive damage assessments.
Following the explosions, Iranian aviation authorities ordered a complete national airspace shutdown. The Civil Aviation Organisation issued the closure directive “until further notice.”
Tehran’s Reaction and Command Structure
A senior Iranian official informed Reuters that Tehran is organizing a “crushing” counter-offensive. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was transported from Tehran to a protected location outside the capital.
These military actions occurred approximately eight months after a 12-day aerial conflict between Israeli and Iranian forces in June 2025. Both Washington and Jerusalem had issued multiple warnings about potential strikes should Iran persist with its nuclear enrichment and ballistic missile development.
Washington’s Detention Designation
Coinciding with the military strikes, the United States formally classified Iran as a “state sponsor of wrongful detention.” Iran became the inaugural nation added to this sanctions list, established through a Trump executive order issued in September 2025.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly demanded Iran release all detained American citizens. He indicated future possibilities include invalidating US passport travel authorization to Iran.
Trump additionally declared his objective of eliminating all uranium enrichment activities in Iran, including civilian nuclear programs. This statement followed indirect diplomatic discussions between US and Iranian representatives in Geneva, where both delegations reported constructive progress.
Oman’s Foreign Minister revealed that Iranian negotiators committed during Geneva talks to permanently cease enriched uranium stockpiling. He characterized this commitment as a significant diplomatic achievement with potential to avert broader conflict.
On Friday, Trump stated he hadn’t reached a “final decision” regarding military action. By Saturday morning, operations had commenced.
Crypto World
Morgan Stanley Applies for National Trust Charter to Hold Clients’ Crypto
Morgan Stanley has taken another step deeper into digital assets, filing for a new national trust bank charter that would allow the firm to custody cryptocurrencies and carry out related services for clients in the United States.
Key Takeaways:
- Morgan Stanley applied for a national trust charter to custody crypto and provide trading and staking services.
- The move is part of a broader institutional push for regulated digital asset infrastructure.
- Approval would let the bank hold client crypto directly as it expands ETFs and wealth management offerings.
A public filing with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency shows the application, submitted Feb. 18, is under the name Morgan Stanley Digital Trust, National Association.
The move would establish a newly created banking entity rather than an acquired institution.
Morgan Stanley Subsidiary to Offer Crypto Custody, Trading and Staking Services
According to reports from Bloomberg and Forbes, the subsidiary would provide custody for selected digital assets and support investment activity through purchases, sales, swaps and transfers.
The filing also outlines plans to offer staking services, an increasingly common feature among institutional crypto platforms.
A national trust charter permits fiduciary operations such as asset safekeeping, custody and trust services. “De novo” status indicates the bank is being formed from scratch.
If approved, it would mark Morgan Stanley’s first trust charter dedicated specifically to crypto.
The application comes amid a broader push by financial institutions to secure federal oversight for digital asset operations.
More recently, payments firms and trading platforms, among them Stripe-owned Bridge and Crypto.com, have also pursued similar approvals.
The race reflects growing demand from institutional clients seeking regulated custody and trading infrastructure following years of market volatility and high-profile exchange failures.
Morgan Stanley has been steadily expanding its presence in the sector. In January, the bank appointed equity markets executive Amy Oldenburg to lead a newly formed digital asset division.
Job postings indicate the firm is hiring additional specialists across strategy and product roles tied to crypto services.
The investment bank has also filed to launch spot Bitcoin and Solana exchange-traded funds, followed by a proposed staked Ether ETF.
Together, the filings suggest a wider strategy aimed at integrating digital assets into traditional wealth management offerings.
If regulators approve the charter, Morgan Stanley would be able to directly safeguard client holdings instead of relying on third-party custodians, potentially positioning the firm as a full-service provider for institutional crypto investors.
OCC Grants Trust Bank Charters to Major Crypto Firms
The OCC approved national trust bank charters in December for a slate of crypto and digital asset firms, including BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, Circle, Ripple and Paxos, widening the on ramp for tokenized finance.
Trust banks sit in a narrower lane than full-service banks, since they generally cannot take deposits or make loans.
Even so, the model can still open doors for stablecoin issuers that want to custody assets and run conversion and settlement services without relying entirely on third-party providers.
Earlier this year, World Liberty Financial also filed for a US national banking charter as stablecoins shift from a trading tool into payment infrastructure.
The post Morgan Stanley Applies for National Trust Charter to Hold Clients’ Crypto appeared first on Cryptonews.
Crypto World
OpenAI Wins Defense Contract Hours After Govt Ditches Anthropic
OpenAI has secured a deal to run its AI models on the Pentagon’s classified network, a move announced by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in a late Friday post on X. The arrangement signals a formal step toward embedding next-generation AI within sensitive military infrastructure, framed by assurances of safety and governance that align with the company’s operating limits. Altman’s message described the department’s approach as one that respects safety guardrails and is willing to work within the company’s boundaries, underscoring a methodical path from civilian deployment to classified environments. The timing places OpenAI at the center of a broader debate about how public institutions should harness artificial intelligence without compromising civil liberties or operational safety, particularly in defense contexts.
The news comes as the White House directs federal agencies to halt use of Anthropic’s technology, initiating a six-month transition for agencies already relying on its systems. The policy demonstrates the administration’s intent to tighten oversight over AI tools used across government while still leaving room for carefully orchestrated, safety-conscious deployments. The juxtaposition between a Pentagon-backed integration and a nationwide pause on a rival platform highlights a government-wide reckoning about how, where, and under what safeguards AI technologies should operate in sensitive domains.
Altman’s remarks emphasized a cautious but constructive stance toward national-security applications. He framed the OpenAI arrangement as one that prioritizes safety while allowing access to powerful capabilities, an argument that aligns with ongoing discussions about responsible AI use in government networks. The Defense Department’s approach—favoring controlled access and rigorous governance—reflects a broader policy impulse to build operational safety into deployments that could otherwise accelerate where and how AI informs critical decisions. The public signaling from both sides suggests a model in which collaboration with defense entities proceeds under strict compliance frameworks rather than broad, unfiltered usage.
Within this regulatory and political backdrop, Anthropic’s situation remains a focal point. The company had been the first AI lab to deploy models across the Pentagon’s classified environment under a $200 million contract signed in July. Negotiations reportedly collapsed after Anthropic sought assurances that its software would not enable autonomous weapons or domestic mass surveillance. The Defense Department, by contrast, insisted that the technology remain available for all lawful military purposes, a stance designed to preserve flexibility for defense needs while maintaining safeguards. The divergence illustrates the delicate balance between enabling cutting-edge capabilities and enforcing guardrails that align with national security and civil-liberties considerations.
Anthropic later stated it was “deeply saddened” by the designation and signaled its intention to challenge the decision in court. The move, if upheld, could set a significant precedent affecting how American technology firms negotiate with government agencies as political scrutiny of AI partnerships intensifies. OpenAI, for its part, has indicated it maintains similar restrictions and has written them into its own agreement framework. Altman noted that OpenAI prohibits domestic mass surveillance and requires human accountability in decisions involving the use of force, including automated weapons systems. These provisions are meant to align with the government’s expectations for responsible AI use in sensitive operations, even as the military explores deeper integration of AI tools into its workflows.
Public reaction to the developments has been mixed. Some observers on social platforms questioned the trajectory of AI governance and the implications for innovation. The discussion touches on broader concerns about how security and civil liberties can be reconciled with the speed and scale of AI deployment in governmental and defense contexts. Nonetheless, the core takeaway is clear: the government is actively experimenting with AI in national-security spaces while simultaneously imposing guardrails to prevent misuse, with the outcomes likely to shape future procurement and collaboration across the tech sector.
Altman’s comments reiterated that OpenAI’s restrictions include a prohibition on domestic mass surveillance and a requirement for human oversight in decisions involving force, including automated weapons systems. Those commitments are framed as prerequisites for access to classified environments, signaling a governance model that seeks to harmonize the power of large-scale AI models with the safeguards demanded by sensitive operations. The broader trajectory suggests a sustained interest among policymakers and defense stakeholders in harnessing AI’s benefits while maintaining tight oversight to prevent overreach or misuse. As this enters a phase of practical implementation, both government agencies and tech providers will be measured against their ability to maintain safety, transparency, and accountability in high-stakes settings.
The unfolding narrative also underscores how procurement and policy decisions around AI will influence the technology’s broader ecosystem. If the Pentagon’s experiments with OpenAI’s models within classified networks prove scalable and secure, they could set a template for future collaborations that blend cutting-edge AI with rigorous governance, a model likely to ripple into adjacent industries—including those exploring AI-assisted analytics and blockchain-based governance mechanisms. At the same time, the Anthropic episode demonstrates how这样 procurement negotiations can hinge on explicit guarantees regarding weaponization and surveillance—an issue that could shape the terms under which startups and incumbents pursue federal contracts.
In parallel, the public discourse around AI policy continues to evolve, with lawmakers and regulators watching closely how private firms respond to national-security demands. The outcome of Anthropic’s intended legal challenge could influence the negotiating playbook for future government partnerships, potentially affecting how terms are drafted, how risk is allocated, and how compliance is verified across different agencies. The OpenAI-aided deployment inside the Pentagon’s classified network remains a test case for balancing the speed and utility of AI with the accountability and safety constraints that define its most sensitive applications.
As the regulatory landscape continues to shift, many in the tech community will be watching for how these developments crystallize into concrete practice—how assessments of risk, security protocols, and governance standards evolve in next-generation AI deployments. The interplay between aggressive capability development and deliberate risk containment is now a central feature of strategic technology planning, with implications that extend beyond defense to other sectors that rely on AI for decision-making, data analysis, and critical operations. The coming months will reveal whether the OpenAI-DoD collaboration can serve as a durable model for secure, responsible AI integration within the state’s most sensitive enclaves.
OpenAI’s late-Friday X post framing the Pentagon deployment, and the Defense Department’s safety-oriented stance toward Anthropic, anchor the narrative in primary statements. The Truth Social post attributed to President Trump further contextualizes the political climate surrounding federal AI policy. On Anthropic’s side, the company’s official statement provides the formal counterpoint to the designation and its legal trajectory. Together, these sources outline a multi-faceted landscape where national security, civil liberties, and commercial interests intersect in real time.
Crypto World
U.S. and Israel Strike Iran, Crypto Market Loses $100M in Minutes
TLDR:
- BTC dropped below $64,000 within hours of Israel’s confirmed strike on Iran’s presidential HQ.
- Ethereum fell over 5% to under $1,900 as traders liquidated risk positions across altcoins.
- Over $100M in long positions were wiped out within 15 minutes of the strike news hitting markets.
- Polymarket trader Vivaldi007 turned $385K profit betting on a U.S.-Israel Iran strike since Feb 8.
Explosions rocked Tehran after Israel launched strikes on Iran’s presidential headquarters and Ministry of Intelligence. Sirens blared across Israel as the IDF sent emergency alerts to citizens’ phones.
Crypto markets responded immediately, shedding over $100 million in long positions within 15 minutes. The joint operation, reportedly involving the United States, sent shockwaves far beyond the Middle East.
Israel-Iran Strike Sends Crypto Prices Into Freefall
Bitcoin dropped roughly 3% within hours of the news breaking. It fell below $64,000 as traders rushed to cut exposure.
Ethereum took a harder hit, sliding over 5% to under $1,900. The broader crypto market cap lost around 6% in early trading, according to market data. According to a snapshot from the cryptobubbles, the market appears red. Most assets are recording substantial drops.

The IDF confirmed sirens sounded throughout Israel shortly before the strikes became public. Citizens received direct cellular alerts to stay near protected spaces. The military framed the alert as a proactive measure. It signaled the scale of what was unfolding.
On-chain tracking platform Lookonchain reported one high-profile casualty of the volatility. Trader Machi, who had deposited $245,000 just four days prior, was liquidated again. His account dropped to only $13,580. The timing proved catastrophic for leveraged long positions across the board.
Not everyone lost. Lookonchain also flagged Polymarket trader Vivaldi007, who had been betting on a U.S.-Israel strike against Iran since February 8. He placed wagers on nearly every available date and kept losing until now. The strikes pushed his total profit to $385,000.
Geopolitical Risk Reignites Crypto Market Volatility
This pattern is not new. When the U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites in June 2025, BTC plunged below $100,000 during a 7% market-wide selloff.
Oil supply fears and global economic uncertainty drove the move. Crypto behaved like a risk asset, not a safe haven.
The April 2024 Israel-Iran exchange produced a similar response. BTC briefly dipped under $60,000 as capital rotated toward gold and the dollar. Markets recovered once tensions cooled. Whether that playbook repeats depends on what comes next.
Iran’s potential response remains the key variable. A closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which handles roughly 20% of global oil, could spike energy prices and reignite inflation fears.
Central bank tightening in that scenario would add further pressure on risk assets. Past modeling suggests a full escalation could cut crypto valuations by 10 to 20% in the short term.
The IDF has not issued further operational updates. Markets remain on edge.
-
Politics6 days agoBaftas 2026: Awards Nominations, Presenters And Performers
-
Sports5 days agoWomen’s college basketball rankings: Iowa reenters top 10, Auriemma makes history
-
Fashion14 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Iris Top
-
Politics5 days agoNick Reiner Enters Plea In Deaths Of Parents Rob And Michele
-
Business4 days agoTrue Citrus debuts functional drink mix collection
-
Politics1 day agoITV enters Gaza with IDF amid ongoing genocide
-
Crypto World4 days agoXRP price enters “dead zone” as Binance leverage hits lows
-
Sports4 hours ago
The Vikings Need a Duck
-
Business6 days agoMattel’s American Girl brand turns 40, dolls enter a new era
-
Business6 days agoLaw enforcement kills armed man seeking to enter Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, officials say
-
Tech4 days agoUnsurprisingly, Apple's board gets what it wants in 2026 shareholder meeting
-
NewsBeat2 days agoManchester Central Mosque issues statement as it imposes new measures ‘with immediate effect’ after armed men enter
-
NewsBeat2 days agoCuba says its forces have killed four on US-registered speedboat | World News
-
NewsBeat5 days ago‘Hourly’ method from gastroenterologist ‘helps reduce air travel bloating’
-
Tech6 days agoAnthropic-Backed Group Enters NY-12 AI PAC Fight
-
NewsBeat6 days agoArmed man killed after entering secure perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, Secret Service says
-
Politics6 days agoMaine has a long track record of electing moderates. Enter Graham Platner.
-
Business2 days agoDiscord Pushes Implementation of Global Age Checks to Second Half of 2026
-
NewsBeat3 days agoPolice latest as search for missing woman enters day nine
-
Business2 days agoOnly 4% of women globally reside in countries that offer almost complete legal equality


BREAKING: This is MASSIVE news for Alts…