Crypto World
NFT sales jump 55.6% to $75.5M as BNB Chain takes lead
NFT sales rose 55.6% to approximately $75.54 million over the past seven days, with BNB Chain overtaking Ethereum after recording more than $32.75 million in sales.
Summary
- NFT sales increased 55.6% to $75.54 million, while transactions fell 14.77% to 650,332.
- Buyer addresses rose 20.38% to 273,655, and seller addresses increased 18.09% to 291,266.
- Ethereum sales fell 14.23% to $18.94 million despite an increase in buyer addresses.
- BNB Chain sales surged 1,042% to $32.75 million, making it the top-ranked network.
- Courtyard led collections with $6.32 million, while a BRC-20 NFT sold for 10 BTC.
According to data from CryptoSlam, captured on Sept. 5 with the seven-day view selected, NFT sales increased from approximately $48.55 million during the preceding period.
Buyer addresses climbed 20.38% to 273,655, while seller addresses increased 18.09% to 291,266. However, total transactions fell 14.77% to 650,332, meaning the increase in sales value occurred alongside fewer recorded transfers.
The average value per transaction rose to approximately $116, compared with about $64 in the prior period. CryptoSlam records blockchain addresses rather than verified individual buyers or sellers, so the address totals should not be treated as confirmed user counts.
NFT activity increased as the broader cryptocurrency market remained volatile. Bitcoin traded near $79,694, while Ethereum changed hands around $2,458 at the time of writing. The total cryptocurrency market capitalization stood at approximately $2.78 trillion.
The concurrent movements do not establish that cryptocurrency prices caused the rise in NFT sales. BNB Chain’s unusually large weekly increase also means the global comparison requires network-level context.
BNB Chain leads NFT sales with $32.75 million
BNB Chain moved into first place with approximately $32.75 million in organic NFT sales, an increase of 1,042% from the previous seven-day period. Buyer addresses on the network rose 30.84% to 22,132.

CryptoSlam recorded only $8 in wash-trading volume for BNB Chain, leaving its combined total close to $32.75 million. The scale and speed of the increase make the network the main contributor to the global weekly gain, although the collection rankings did not show one BNB Chain project accounting for most of the amount.
Ethereum ranked second with $18.94 million in organic sales, down 14.23%. Wash trading declined 56.30% to approximately $742,249, putting the network’s combined total at $19.68 million. Ethereum buyer addresses increased by 21.13% to 40,098 despite the decline in sales value.
Polygon followed with $7.29 million in organic sales, up 6.12%. The blockchain also recorded $18.73 million in wash trading, taking its combined volume to $26.02 million. Polygon’s 94,731 buyer addresses represented the largest total among the leading chains and increased by 10.67%.
Bitcoin ranked fourth with $5.87 million, down 34.20% from the previous period. Buyer addresses nevertheless rose 28.95% to 13,103. The network also generated approximately $94,991 in wash volume, producing a combined total of $5.96 million.
Base placed fifth after sales increased 36.59% to $4.23 million. Its wash-trading volume reached $4.80 million, exceeding organic sales and lifting combined volume to $9.03 million. Buyer addresses jumped 64.50% to 5,050.
Solana completed the leading six with $1.91 million in organic sales, up 9.99%. The network recorded 47,853 buyer addresses, an increase of 24%, and about $24,849 in wash activity.
Courtyard tops weekly NFT collection sales
Polygon-based Courtyard remained the leading NFT collection with $6.32 million in sales, up 7.50%. The platform recorded 97,050 transactions, a 1.01% increase, while buyer addresses fell 7.63% to 17,766.

Courtyard’s sales represented approximately 8.4% of global NFT volume. Its high transaction count separates the collection’s activity from projects where weekly sales were concentrated among a small number of wallets or transfers.
Base-based Beezie ranked second with $2.64 million, up 39.39%. Transactions increased 47.36% to 16,521, but CryptoSlam recorded only nine buyer addresses and 240 seller addresses. The low buyer count means the sales figure was highly concentrated rather than spread across a broad group of addresses.
Ethereum’s Argonauts placed third with $2.07 million despite sales falling 63.54%. Transactions declined by 72.74% to 3,068, while buyer and seller addresses also fell by more than 50%.
CryptoPunks followed with $1.86 million, down 9.92% from the prior week. The collection produced 18 transactions involving 15 buyer addresses and 15 seller addresses.
Blokyz generated $1.48 million, a decline of 19.56%, from 3,889 transactions. Bored Ape Yacht Club ranked sixth with $1.17 million, up 19.71%, while its transaction count increased 18.87% to 63.
Guild of Guardians Heroes completed the leading seven with $981,850 in sales, up 2.64%. Its transactions fell 5.78% to 733, while buyer addresses declined 15.42%.
BRC-20 NFT leads high-value NFT sales
Bitcoin-based $REWD BRC-20 NFT #68f822daa8f482226a42a15319b5fe66a… recorded the largest sale, changing hands for 10 BTC, worth approximately $796,863, nine hours before the snapshot.

Another Bitcoin-based asset from the $X@AI BRC-20 NFT collection ranked second. It sold for 5.1158 BTC, valued at approximately $394,346, three days earlier.
CryptoPunks #1839 placed third after selling for 161.5 ETH, or approximately $394,320, around 18 hours before the data capture.
Algebra Positions NFT-V2 #43 recorded the fourth-largest sale at 365,231.125 USDT, worth approximately $365,231, two days earlier. Algebra position NFTs represent decentralized exchange liquidity positions rather than conventional digital collectibles.
CryptoSlam classified both BRC-20 transactions and the Algebra position transfer as NFT sales, though their economic structures differ from those of profile-picture and digital-art NFTs.
Crypto World
Bitcoin, Ethereum ETFs draw $1.2B in weekly inflows
U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds attracted a combined $1.20 billion during the trading week ending Sept. 4, with Bitcoin products accounting for more than 80% of the total.
Summary
- Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $986.7 million in weekly net inflows.
- Ethereum ETFs added $215.3 million, down sharply from the previous week.
- BlackRock’s Bitcoin funds attracted $691.5 million across the five sessions.
- The largest combined inflows arrived on Sept. 3 as crypto prices rebounded.
Bitcoin ETF inflows approach $1 billion
According to data from Farside Investors, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $986.7 million in net inflows between Aug. 31 and Sept. 4. The weekly intake increased about 6.7% from the $924.5 million added during the previous five trading sessions.
The funds opened the week with $216.7 million in net inflows on Aug. 31 before recording $236.5 million in withdrawals on Sept. 1. Demand returned over the following three sessions, producing inflows of $101.1 million, $730.8 million, and $174.6 million.
Sept. 3 accounted for roughly 74% of the entire weekly total. BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin products attracted $454 million that day, while ARK Invest and 21Shares’ ARKB added $137.7 million. Fidelity’s FBTC and Grayscale’s Bitcoin Mini Trust recorded $74.4 million and $48.8 million, respectively.
BlackRock’s products led the full week with about $691.5 million in net inflows. ARKB followed with $137.7 million, while Fidelity’s fund added $94.8 million.
Bitwise’s BITB received $41.7 million during the period. VanEck’s HODL posted approximately $33 million in net withdrawals, while Grayscale’s converted GBTC fund recorded a modest $18.6 million inflow.
The five-day result brought cumulative net inflows across the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market to approximately $55.69 billion, according to Farside’s data.
Ethereum ETF demand slows from the previous week
U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $215.3 million in net inflows over the same period, Farside data showed. Although the funds remained net positive, weekly inflows fell by around 73.6% from $815.7 million during the previous week.
Ethereum products started the period with an $87.6 million inflow on Aug. 31 and added another $8.6 million on Sept. 1. The group then recorded $48.2 million in net outflows on Sept. 2 before attracting $141.4 million on Sept. 3 and $25.9 million on Sept. 4.
BlackRock’s ETHA brought in $136.4 million during the week, while its staked Ethereum product ETHB added $81.8 million. The two BlackRock funds therefore received a combined $218.2 million, slightly more than the category’s total net inflow after withdrawals from competing products were included.
Fidelity’s FETH ended the week with only $4.7 million in net inflows. The fund attracted $65.1 million on Sept. 3 but lost $48.3 million the following session.
Grayscale’s higher-fee ETHE recorded $37 million in weekly net outflows. Grayscale’s lower-cost Ethereum Mini Trust partly offset those withdrawals with $17.1 million in inflows.
Cumulative net inflows into U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs reached approximately $13.19 billion by the end of the week.
Crypto ETF inflows diverge from wider U.S. funds
The $1.20 billion combined inflow into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs came during a cautious period for conventional U.S. investment funds.
Investors withdrew $11.12 billion from U.S. equity funds during the week ending Sept. 2, according to LSEG Lipper data reported by Reuters. Large-cap funds accounted for $7.52 billion of those withdrawals, while money market funds attracted $48.76 billion.
Reuters tied the broader caution to rising bond yields, higher oil prices and tensions in the Middle East. Those factors weighed on risk assets earlier in the week, but sentiment improved on Sept. 3 after Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he could support keeping interest rates unchanged if inflation continued to ease.
The shift coincided with the largest daily crypto ETF inflows of the week. Bitcoin and Ethereum funds collectively attracted about $872.2 million on Sept. 3, while Bitcoin climbed above $81,000 and Ethereum moved back toward $2,500.
The subsequent reversal showed that ETF inflows did not remove short-term macro risks. Bitcoin was trading near $79,664 at the time of writing, down about 1.8% over the latest session, while Ethereum traded around $2,458 after a 2.8% decline.
U.S. data keeps rate expectations in focus
The next test for ETF demand could come from changing expectations for U.S. interest rates. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000 in August, while the unemployment rate remained at 4.1%.
The stronger labor data reduced some of the optimism created by Waller’s comments because a resilient economy could give the Federal Reserve more room to keep borrowing costs elevated.
Investors will now focus on the Sept. 11 U.S. consumer price index report and the Federal Reserve’s Sept. 16 policy decision. Further evidence of persistent inflation could pressure crypto prices and ETF demand, while softer inflation would support the case for stable or lower interest rates.
Despite those risks, the weekly figures showed that U.S. investors remained net buyers of both major crypto ETF categories. Bitcoin products maintained their momentum from the previous week, while Ethereum funds stayed positive even as their weekly intake slowed.
Crypto World
Ripple CEO Slams $11 Billion Gold Move: Can Crypto Do Better?
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has seized on the Dutch central bank’s $11 billion gold move. He says global finance still shifts value the way it did in the 1940s.
De Nederlandsche Bank sent roughly 86 tonnes of gold to London between March and August. The metal came from New York and Ottawa.
Ripple CEO Says the Gold Move Proves Crypto’s Case
The Dutch central bank sold about 59 tonnes in New York. It then bought the same quantity back in London. Nearly 70% of the transfer was therefore a paper exercise.
Only 27 tonnes actually crossed the Atlantic. New York now holds 18.5% of Dutch reserves, down from 31.3%. London’s share climbed to 32.1%. DNB holds 612.4 tonnes in total, worth 72.2 billion euros at the end of 2025.
Garlinghouse contrasted that friction with crypto’s past decade. He said the sector grew from a $1.5 billion experiment into a $2.7 trillion asset class.
He also revisited Germany’s 2013 repatriation. The Bundesbank needed four years to bring home 674 tonnes worth roughly $36 billion.
Old Rails Still Carry the World’s Money
DNB Governor Olaf Sleijpen framed the relocation as crisis preparation, not distrust of Washington. London handles far more physical gold trade than Ottawa.
“With this relocation, we have improved the tradability of our gold reserves. We expect that we will never need to use them, but we do need to strengthen our resilience and preparedness.”
Sleijpen, DNB
The mechanics still support Garlinghouse’s complaint. Banks settle value through correspondent queues, while stablecoins clear payments instantly. SWIFT switched on its own blockchain ledger in July, yet final settlement runs on older rails.
Garlinghouse made a similar point after the Mastercard deal in June. XRP trades near $1.40, down 3,65% on the day but up 21% over three months.
The Bank for International Settlements, owned by central banks, tested the XRP Ledger this month. Its prototype anchored official statistics in three to five seconds. Verification took one to two.
So can crypto do better? On speed, those numbers say yes. On trust, not yet. Central banks want vaults, insurance and legal finality.
Sleijpen’s decision to move gold to London was driven by the necessity of crisis-era tradability, a form of structural security that digital assets are still working to replicate.
The post Ripple CEO Slams $11 Billion Gold Move: Can Crypto Do Better? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Poland crypto bill blocked after third presidential veto
Poland’s Sejm has fallen 25 votes short of overriding President Karol Nawrocki’s third veto of a crypto regulation bill, with 241 lawmakers supporting the measure against the 266 required.
Summary
- The Sejm voted 241–198 to override Nawrocki’s veto, while three lawmakers abstained.
- Passing the bill again required a three-fifths majority, or 266 of the 442 lawmakers present.
- The legislation would have placed Poland’s crypto market under the supervision of the KNF.
- Donald Tusk cited testimony from the Zondacrypto investigation while urging lawmakers to support the bill.
Polish Radio reported on Sept. 4 that Poland’s lower house failed to pass the crypto bill again after President Karol Nawrocki refused to sign it for the third time.
Poland crypto bill falls 25 votes short
Of the 442 lawmakers present, 241 voted to override the president, 198 opposed the motion, and three abstained. Polish law required support from three-fifths of lawmakers voting with at least half of the Sejm’s 460 members present, setting the threshold at 266 votes.
An override would have required Nawrocki to sign the legislation. With the motion defeated, the latest version cannot advance through the legislative process.
The bill would have designated the Polish Financial Supervision Authority, known as the KNF, as the country’s crypto regulator. Its provisions were designed to support Poland’s implementation of the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, or MiCA.
Nawrocki has said he supports rules for the sector but considers the government’s version too restrictive. When he rejected the legislation on June 11, the president said lawmakers had addressed only one of the 16 changes proposed by his office.
“Bad law does not become good law simply because it is passed a hundred times,” Nawrocki said in a video statement announcing the third veto.
According to the president, the bill could place excessive burdens on Polish crypto companies and encourage some businesses to operate from other jurisdictions. He has also accused the governing coalition of repeatedly returning legislation that failed to resolve objections raised during previous rounds.
Nawrocki submitted a separate proposal that his office described as offering stronger safeguards against fraud and financial crime without imposing the same costs on legitimate companies. The president said Parliament had not supported his version.
Three vetoes have prolonged Poland’s MiCA dispute
The latest defeat follows two previous attempts by Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s government to pass a domestic crypto framework.
As crypto.news previously reported, Nawrocki rejected the first Crypto-Asset Market Act on Dec. 1, 2025. His objections included the regulator’s proposed authority to block crypto-related websites and the costs that companies could face under the law.
The Sejm tried to overturn that decision four days later. Lawmakers backed the override by 243 votes to 192 but failed to reach the required three-fifths majority.
After Parliament passed another version, Nawrocki issued his second veto on Feb. 12, arguing that it was almost identical to the original legislation. A second override attempt failed on April 17, when lawmakers voted 243–191 in favor and three abstained.
By May, the Sejm was considering competing proposals from the government, the president’s office, Poland 2050, and the Confederation party. The packages differed over the KNF’s enforcement powers and the financial penalties available to the regulator, according to earlier coverage of the bills.
The government-backed legislation passed the Sejm on May 15 against the backdrop of an investigation into Zondacrypto. The measure included licensing and reporting duties for crypto service providers, KNF supervision, and criminal liability for certain violations connected with token issuance and crypto services.
MiCA already applies across the EU, but national authorities still handle licensing, supervision and enforcement within the bloc’s common framework. The regulation covers crypto service providers, exchanges, custodians and certain token issuers, while allowing authorized companies to use passporting rules to operate across member states.
The EU’s transition period ended on July 1, leaving firms that lacked authorization facing service restrictions or an orderly wind-down. An ESMA register cited in June showed that 244 crypto service provider licenses had been issued shortly before the deadline, while Germany and France accounted for more than one-third of them.
Zondacrypto allegations shape the political fight
Before the Sept. 4 vote, Tusk urged lawmakers to override Nawrocki’s veto and referred to an investigation involving the defunct Zondacrypto exchange.
Polish Radio reported that Tusk read parts of witness testimony that implicated former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro. According to the testimony presented by the prime minister, Ziobro had allegedly promised to stop the Zondacrypto case if he returned to power.
The statement alleged that PLN 2 million, worth about €463,000, was intended as “compensation” for Ziobro and would pass through a foundation established by his brother. Of that amount, PLN 500,000, or roughly €116,000, was allegedly assigned to Ziobro’s personal expenses.
Tusk said the testimony identified Ziobro’s wife, Patrycja Kotecka, as playing the main role in the alleged arrangement. The account forms part of an investigation, and the claims cited in Parliament have not been presented as court findings.
During the parliamentary debate, Tusk accused members of the opposition Law and Justice party, or PiS, of supporting people involved in questionable crypto dealings.
“You are disgracing yourselves,” Tusk told the lawmakers.
The political dispute surrounding the exchange had already surfaced during the second veto vote in April. At the time, Tusk alleged that Zondacrypto had received funds connected to Russian organized crime and had supported political and social events associated with right-wing groups in Poland. The allegations and the exchange’s political connections were detailed in an April report on Zondacrypto.
Nawrocki has rejected claims connecting him to the company. In April, he said he had never met Zondacrypto chief executive Przemysław Kral or company representatives and had no information showing that the exchange supported his presidential campaign.
U.S. crypto rules take a different route
For U.S. readers, Poland’s vote does not change access to American exchanges, crypto funds or other U.S.-regulated investment products. The Polish measure concerns domestic enforcement of an EU regulatory framework and the powers available to the KNF.
Washington has been developing its own system through federal agencies and Congress rather than adopting an EU-style single licensing regime. On Aug. 18, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, a framework for certain investment contracts involving digital assets.
The proposal includes one exemption for offerings of up to $5 million over four years and another permitting qualifying issuers to raise as much as $75 million in a 12-month period. It also contains disclosure duties and a conditional safe harbor addressing when a crypto asset would no longer be treated as part of an investment contract.
SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the proposal was designed to give crypto companies clearer fundraising routes under federal securities laws while maintaining investor protections. The agency opened a 60-day public comment period following the publication of the proposal.
Unlike Poland’s bill, the SEC proposal focuses on securities offerings and does not create a national operating license equivalent to MiCA authorization. U.S. crypto businesses may also fall under CFTC rules, state money-transmitter requirements, and other federal or state laws, depending on their products and activities.
Separately, Poland has formally requested Ziobro’s extradition from the United States, where Polish Radio said the former minister has lived since May after losing refugee status in Hungary. The request covers 19 of the 26 alleged offenses he faces in a separate investigation concerning conduct during his time in office.
Crypto World
2 Major Ripple (XRP) News From The Past 24 Hours: Details
Less than two months after announcing a major partnership with the Kansas Jayhawks, the company behind XRP has doubled down on its US sports endeavors by collaborating with the Florida Gators.
Almost immediately after the news was announced, both parties shared a video showing that XRP’s logo was painted on the sports team’s ground.
$XRP and @FloridaGators.
Soon. https://t.co/AI7wKEy3xw— Ripple (@Ripple) September 4, 2026
Further details on the partnership indicate that the team will generate $5 million annually by placing the logos in the Swamp.
“Florida has a long history of embracing innovation and technology to enhance the experience of our fans and advance our programs,” athletic director Scott Stricklin said in a statement. “This partnership brings together two organizations that think boldly about the future, and we look forward to introducing XRP to our fans.”
The first game to host XRP’s logo will be played tonight at the Ben Hill Griffin Stadium, as the Florida Gators will face the Florida Atlantic Owls.
Recall that Ripple made a similar partnership with the Kansas Jayhawks, who represent the University of Kansas, and their teams have won 15 national championships, including 12 NCAA Division I titles. This one was more personal for Ripple’s CEO, who was raised in the state and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of Kansas.
The second news was shared by one of the most popular XRP Army members, BankXRP, on X. The user noted that Ripple will be the headline sponsor of Stable Launch – Stablecon USA’s startup competition.
The company’s Whittney Levitt will join the judging panel of the event, in which the winning startup gets a $200,000 investment.
The post 2 Major Ripple (XRP) News From The Past 24 Hours: Details appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
Bitcoin Spot ETF Inflows Reach $3.8B in Peak Three-Week Run of 2026
US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) extended a late-summer demand surge, logging their strongest three-week stretch of 2026. The rebound coincided with Bitcoin trading around the $80,000 level, with weekly inflows accelerating into the week ending Friday.
SoSoValue data shows the funds pulled in $986.9 million during the week ending Friday. That pushed cumulative net inflows over the past three weeks to $3.8 billion. Total net assets across the suite were $101.3 billion on Friday, after rising to $103.3 billion the prior day. Since inception, cumulative net inflows reached $55.6 billion.
Key takeaways
- US spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $986.9 million in the week ending Friday, lifting three-week net inflows to $3.8 billion.
- Friday’s total net inflow was $174.6 million, down from a much larger Thursday surge of nearly $731 million.
- BlackRock’s IBIT led demand with $117.4 million on Friday, about 67% of that day’s inflows, per Farside Investors.
- Bitcoin ETF momentum is improving versus the prior week, but year-to-date flows remain about $1 billion negative, reflecting lingering uncertainty from earlier 2026 outflows.
- While Bitcoin inflows strengthened, spot Ether and XRP ETF flows fell sharply on a weekly basis.
Three-week rebound highlights a demand shift
The latest inflow sequence represents a significant improvement from earlier in 2026, when spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced heavy outflows. The contrast matters for market participants tracking whether institutional demand is broadening or simply reacting to short-term price moves.
According to SoSoValue, the three-week net inflow total of $3.8 billion is far more consistent than the earlier part of the year. Still, the broader picture remains mixed: year-to-date net flows are reported to be roughly $1 billion negative. That implies the ETF complex is recovering, but not fully reversing the cumulative drain from prior months.
Net asset values also underline the pace of the recovery. Total net assets across the US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs stood at $101.3 billion on Friday, following a brief bump to $103.3 billion on Thursday.
Friday inflows cool after Thursday’s spike
Demand didn’t maintain Thursday’s intensity. US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $174.6 million in net inflows on Friday, according to the reporting in the week’s flow recap. That figure was a sharp drop from the nearly $731 million recorded a day earlier, as referenced by earlier market coverage linked in the source.
Within the broader total, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) remained the dominant driver. Farside Investors data cited in the source shows IBIT received $117.4 million on Friday, contributing about 67% of the day’s net inflows.
Elsewhere, Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) was the only other fund to post net inflows, attracting $57.2 million. All other US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded no net flows for the day, highlighting how concentrated inflow activity can be even in a strong overall period.
Price action also provides context for the flow pattern. Bitcoin slid from around $81,200 to briefly under $79,000 on Friday. At the time of publication, Bitcoin traded at $79,716, up about 2.6% over the prior seven days, based on CoinGecko data included in the source.
Rotation away from Ether and XRP ETFs
The rebound in Bitcoin ETF inflows came alongside a noticeable weakening in other crypto-asset ETF demand. Compared with the previous week, Bitcoin ETF inflows were up by about 7%, while flows into US spot Ether and XRP ETFs fell by roughly 74% and 83%, respectively, based on SoSoValue figures.
SoSoValue shows spot Ether ETF inflows dropped to $218.4 million from $824.4 million a week earlier. For XRP, inflows declined to $19 million from $110.5 million over the same comparison period.
Despite the weekly pullback, both Ether and XRP ETF products remain net positive for the year. SoSoValue data cited in the source indicates US spot Ether ETFs have recorded about $863 million in net inflows year-to-date, while XRP ETFs have attracted roughly $515 million.
This divergence is a useful signal for investors: even when institutional allocation preferences shift, it often happens unevenly across asset classes rather than uniformly. For traders and allocators, the key is whether the Bitcoin-specific demand trend continues long enough to further erode earlier negative year-to-date positioning.
What to watch next as flows become the focus
With Bitcoin ETF inflows showing resilience after earlier outflows, the next question is whether the complex can sustain inflow momentum beyond this three-week window—especially given Friday’s cooling versus Thursday’s outsized day. Investors should watch for whether IBIT and FBTC continue to concentrate the bulk of inflows, and whether Ether and XRP ETFs remain under pressure or stabilize after their recent weekly declines.
Crypto World
Bitcoin ETF Demand Grows While Ether and XRP Cool
US-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have recorded their strongest three-week inflow stretch of 2026 as Bitcoin traded around $80,000.
The funds attracted $986.9 million in the week ending Friday, bringing net inflows over the past three weeks to $3.8 billion, according to SoSoValue data.
Total net assets across the funds stood at $101.3 billion on Friday after briefly rising to $103.3 billion a day earlier, while cumulative net inflows reached $55.6 billion.
ETF demand marks a sharp turnaround from heavy outflows earlier in 2026, though year-to-date net flows remain roughly $1 billion negative.
Bitcoin ETF inflows cool after Thursday surge
US spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $174.6 million in net inflows on Friday, down sharply from the nearly $731 million recorded a day earlier.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the largest spot Bitcoin ETF by assets, drew $117.4 million on Friday, accounting for about 67% of the day’s total net inflows, according to Farside Investors data.

Daily spot Bitcoin ETF flows from Monday through Friday. Source: SoSoValue
Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) was the only other fund to record net inflows, attracting $57.2 million, while all other US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded no net flows for the day.
Related: Surprise nonfarm payrolls print sends Bitcoin back below 80K
The slowdown came as Bitcoin fell from around $81,200 to briefly below $79,000 on Friday. Bitcoin traded at $79,716 at the time of publication, still up about 2.6% over the past seven days, according to CoinGecko.
Bitcoin ETF demand strengthens as Ether, XRP flows fade
Compared with the previous week, Bitcoin ETF inflows increased about 7%, while inflows into US spot Ether and XRP ETFs fell about 74% and 83%, respectively.
Spot Ether ETF inflows dropped to $218.4 million from $824.4 million, while XRP ETF inflows declined to $19 million from $110.5 million, according to SoSoValue.
Despite weaker inflows, Ether and XRP ETFs remain in positive territory for the year. US spot Ether ETFs have recorded about $863 million in net inflows year-to-date, while XRP ETFs have attracted roughly $515 million.
Magazine: BTC will hit $1M by 2030… but Arthur Hayes is buying ETH instead
Crypto World
BTC holders can easily earn $8,400 daily
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
The cryptocurrency market, currently dominated by Bitcoin (BTC), is entering a new cycle and attracting numerous investors; however, as economic cycles shift and the industry experiences its ups and downs, no single investment can perform exceptionally well in every environment.
Summary
- EiCrypto markets Bitcoin-linked contracts as an alternative to actively trading BTC.
- Contract plans range from $100 to $24,000, with terms lasting two to 30 days.
- The platform says earnings are settled automatically 24 hours after contract activation.
- Advertised returns and customer income claims are promotional and are not independently verified.
Consequently, many BTC investors are seeking diversified investment strategies; by moving beyond the singular “buy low, sell high” speculative approach, they can more easily mitigate risk, generate stable returns, and build long-term wealth without having to sell their Bitcoin holdings.
A new choice for Bitcoin holders: the all-new EiCrypto contract strategy yield plan
As the market demand for stable investment solutions continues to grow, digital asset service provider EiCrypto has launched a new Bitcoin (BTC)-based contract product designed to offer BTC holders a potential avenue for generating returns.
This strategy allows Bitcoin to be held in EiCrypto’s independently managed accounts; upon the activation of a hash rate contract, the platform’s professional operations team assumes full responsibility for operational services, with earnings automatically settled to the client’s account.
Start your journey to earning with Bitcoin quickly in just four steps.
Register an account: Sign up here to receive a $15 new-user bonus.
Deposit methods: Users can deposit and withdraw funds using major cryptocurrencies such as BTC, USDT, ETH, LTC, USDC, XRP, SOL, BNB, DOGE, ADA, BCH, and more.
Select a contract: EiCrypto offers a variety of tailored contract plans to meet the diverse needs of users worldwide; simply choose the plan that suits you best and start mining with a single click.
Activate the contract: Once the contract is activated, earnings will be automatically settled to your account after 24 hours. You are free to withdraw your earnings or reinvest them; compound investing is one of the most effective ways to rapidly grow your assets.
Popular mining solutions:
Novice Contract Plan: $100 — 2-day term — Total return approx. $108
Basic Contract Plan: $600 — 5-day term — Total return approx. $639
Basic Contract Plan: $1,200 — 10-day term — Total return approx. $1,362
Stable Contract Plan: $2,500 — 15-day term — Total return approx. $2,025
Stable Contract Plan: $11,000 — 25-day term — Total return approx. $15,812
Stable Contract Plan: $24,000 — 30-day term — Total return approx. $38,040
Click here to view more contract details.
David Rodríguez Fernández, a Bitcoin holder from Barcelona, Spain, stated…
My investment in Bitcoin has been limited to the traditional approach of buying low and selling high; however, my assets often sit idle for long periods, and since I cannot accurately predict market direction, it is common for them to shrink in value.
EiCrypto’s contract strategy represents a truly significant innovation. I no longer need to trade Bitcoin frequently; instead, I simply use my Bitcoin to purchase an EiCrypto contract plan and log in via my phone each day to track my earnings. It requires no extra effort, and my daily income is now around $4,000.
The advantages of EiCrypto
Convenient services
The platform features a simple, intuitive interface, allowing users to view account information and service data at any time, making digital asset management easier and more efficient.
Security assurance
EiCrypto prioritizes the protection of user accounts and data through multi-layered security mechanisms—including account security, data protection, risk control, and encryption technology—to provide a robust service environment.
Efficient operations
Leveraging cloud computing and automation technologies, the platform automates the management of computing power resources and operational workflows; this minimizes manual intervention, enabling users to participate in cloud computing services with greater ease.
24/7 service
Cloud computing services operate continuously, supported by round-the-clock system maintenance and customer service, allowing users to check their accounts and manage services whenever they wish.
Conclusion
The cryptocurrency market is reshaping the world’s financial landscape, and EiCrypto’s unique contract strategy is becoming a preferred choice for speculators seeking diversified portfolios. Only by maximizing asset utilization and minimizing risk can one obtain the most substantial returns in cryptocurrencies.
If you also want to earn $8,400 a day through Bitcoin, ETH, or XRP, or learn more details…
Please take three minutes to visit the official website.:www.eicrypto.com
Click here to download the application.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Crypto World
Polymarket seeks $1b, Cronos reverses $75m hack, Bitcoin ETFs draw $731m
In this week’s edition of the weekly recap, Polymarket pursued a $1 billion funding round at a proposed $21 billion valuation, while Cronos reversed its blockchain after a $75 million exploit. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs also posted their strongest daily inflow since January as BTC briefly crossed $82,000.
Summary
- Polymarket’s planned $1 billion round would value the prediction market platform at $21 billion.
- Cronos validators reversed the blockchain after a Tectonic exploit affected about $75 million in assets.
- U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $730.8 million in net inflows on Sept. 3.
- FinCEN linked $12.7 billion in transactions to Southeast Asian crypto investment scams.
- The National Sheriffs’ Association withdrew its opposition to the CLARITY Act before a Senate vote.
Polymarket seeks $1 billion at $21 billion valuation
- Donald Trump Jr.’s 1789 Capital agreed to lead a planned $1 billion Polymarket funding round with an investment of roughly $300 million. The transaction would value the prediction market platform at $21 billion, up from nearly $15 billion.
- The planned investment would bring 1789 Capital’s disclosed Polymarket commitments to about $500 million. Polymarket returned to the U.S. through its $112 million acquisition of CFTC-licensed QCEX after restricting American users under a 2022 settlement.
Cronos reverses chain after $75 million exploit
- Cronos rolled back its blockchain following an exploit involving the Tectonic lending protocol and about $75 million in assets. Validators reverted the network to a point before the attack after initially halting block production.
- RedStone said the incident did not result from an oracle failure, challenging early claims about the exploit’s cause. The rollback restored the earlier network state but also raised questions about transaction finality and validator control.
Bitcoin ETFs draw $731 million as BTC reverses
- U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $730.8 million in net inflows on Sept. 3, their strongest daily result since January. The inflow followed renewed institutional demand after an earlier period of withdrawals.
- Bitcoin briefly climbed above $82,000 before stronger-than-expected U.S. employment data lifted Treasury yields and reduced expectations for easier Federal Reserve policy. BTC subsequently erased its daily gains and returned to the $79,000 range.
FinCEN traces $12.7 billion to crypto scams
- The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network linked about $12.7 billion in transactions to suspected Southeast Asian crypto investment scams between 2020 and 2025.
- FinCEN said criminal networks used fraudulent investment platforms, social engineering, and forced-labor compounds to target victims. The agency asked U.S. financial institutions to monitor shell companies, rapid stablecoin transfers, and payments to platforms introduced through unsolicited online relationships.
CLARITY Act loses law enforcement opponent
- The National Sheriffs’ Association withdrew its opposition to the CLARITY Act and adopted a neutral position before the Senate’s scheduled Sept. 15 procedural vote.
- The group had raised concerns about anti-money laundering rules covering DeFi platforms and non-custodial software. Neutrality does not amount to endorsement, but the change removes an active source of law enforcement opposition as supporters seek the 60 votes needed to advance the bill.
Strategy buys 4,603 Bitcoin
- Strategy purchased 4,603 BTC for $369.7 million between Aug. 24 and Aug. 30, returning to accumulation after more than two months without a confirmed purchase.
- The company paid an average of $80,318 per Bitcoin and raised the acquisition funds through sales of MSTR shares. Its total holdings reached 845,050 BTC, acquired for approximately $63.73 billion at an average cost of $75,412 per coin.
Banks commit to joint stablecoin company
- Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs and 18 other financial institutions committed to forming a stablecoin company during the second half of 2026, subject to closing conditions.
- The consortium plans to launch a U.S. dollar stablecoin in the first half of 2027 and may later issue tokens tied to other G7 currencies. The group has not disclosed the token’s name, blockchain, reserve custodian or final redemption model.
SEC proposes tokenized securities recordkeeping rules
- The Securities and Exchange Commission proposed its first major transfer-agent rule overhaul in more than four decades as tokenized securities enter regulated U.S. markets.
- The proposal would update registration, recordkeeping, transfer processing, and asset-protection requirements. Blockchain-based transfer agents would face controls covering digital records, cybersecurity, audit trails, and business continuity. Public comments will remain open for 60 days after Federal Register publication.
ICE taps tZERO for NYSE tokenization platform
- Intercontinental Exchange agreed to invest in tZERO and license its blockchain patents as the companies develop infrastructure for a planned NYSE-affiliated tokenized securities platform.
- tZERO will assist with transfer-agent and broker-dealer systems intended to support onchain issuance, trading, and settlement. ICE did not disclose its investment, while the proposed round-the-clock trading platform still requires regulatory approval.
Fairshake retains $122 million for U.S. elections
- Crypto industry-backed super PAC Fairshake entered the final stage of the 2026 U.S. election cycle with $122 million available after supporting nearly 50 successful primary candidates.
- Fairshake and its affiliates have backed candidates from both parties, including several lawmakers who supported digital asset legislation. The group’s largest primary defeat followed more than $10 million in spending against Illinois candidate Juliana Stratton.
Coinbase files for U.S. stock perpetuals
- Coinbase filed two SEC notices as it works with U.S. regulators to introduce perpetual futures tied to individual public companies.
- The planned contracts would offer continuous stock-price exposure without giving traders ownership of the underlying shares. The filings do not constitute regulatory approval, and Coinbase has not announced a launch date or list of supported companies.
Revolut receives conditional U.S. bank approval
- Revolut secured conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to establish a national bank in Stamford, Connecticut.
- The fintech plans to contribute about $95 million in initial capital and aims to open the bank in the first half of 2027. Planned products include deposits, cards, loans, foreign exchange, and a stablecoin, although FDIC, Federal Reserve, and final OCC approvals remain outstanding.
Chainlink takes U.S. economic data onchain
- Chainlink introduced U.S. economic data feeds on 10 blockchains through the Department of Commerce’s blockchain data program.
- The feeds distribute Bureau of Economic Analysis indicators for use in smart contracts and financial applications. The rollout followed an earlier initiative that published U.S. gross domestic product data across nine networks, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana.
Russia opens regulated crypto trading
- Russia’s comprehensive framework for crypto trading, custody and cross-border settlements took effect on Sept. 1 under Bank of Russia supervision.
- Non-qualified investors can purchase up to 300,000 rubles of eligible crypto annually through each intermediary after passing a test. Qualified investors face no equivalent purchase cap. Crypto remains prohibited for domestic payments but can be used for foreign trade settlements.
Robinhood and AMC clash over stock tokens
- AMC Entertainment CEO Adam Aron objected to Robinhood’s token linked to AMC shares, arguing that the company had not authorized the product. The dispute later escalated into a legal threat after Robinhood refused to withdraw it.
- Robinhood’s stock tokens target eligible customers outside the United States and do not carry the same ownership or voting rights as registered shares. The conflict added pressure for clearer rules governing tokenized equity products.
Crypto World
Pi Network Just Released 3 Major Upgrades: Here’s What They Mean for Pioneers
The Core Team behind the popular project rolled out three new capabilities designed to make its ecosystem more attractive to app developers. The project also overhauled its developer documentation as it continues its broader push toward real-world utility.
The team said this update comes after several months of releases focused on enhancing Pi beyond simple crypto transactions and creating more reasons for users to actually explore and utilize the ecosystem.
3 New Features
The three new developer capabilities are local storage, access to app-specific staking data, and file and video sharing. Perhaps the most interesting is the first one.
Selected whitelisted Pi Browser apps can now store certain information directly on a user’s device instead of requiring devs to maintain their own backend infrastructure. Preferences, session inflation, and other applicable data can consequently be stored on the device, which can reduce infrastructure costs and complexity while providing a consistent experience across Android and iOS, added the post.
It’s worth noting that the data is not uploaded to Pi Network’s servers, even though the feature currently has several limitations. Only whitelisted apps have access, as storage capability is limited, and old data can eventually be removed.
Staking Data API, the second release, allows eligible developers to see how much effective Pi a user has staked specifically for their application through Ecosystem Directory Staking. Devs could potentially use this info to build app-specific features around their most committed supporters.
The last one, called Pi.shareFile, allows apps to use a phone’s native sharing functionality for files, images, and videos. Some of the examples outlined in the blog post range from marketplace customers sharing receipts or photos to gaming and content apps allowing users to share clips directly.
More Devs Wanted
In addition to the three new features, Pi Network announced that it has consolidated previously fragmented dev resources into a single documentation platform, which now covers everything from app registration and sandbox development to authentication, Pi payments, Mainnet preparation, and launch.
It also introduces AI-assisted guidance for integrating authentication and payments. The idea is quite clear as it reduces the friction involved in building applications for Pi and fits into the project’s broader strategy.
The team said that these releases tackle a problem that could be very important for the project and the native token’s long-term prospects: giving developers more tools and fewer technical obstacles to continue building apps that people actually want to use.
The post Pi Network Just Released 3 Major Upgrades: Here’s What They Mean for Pioneers appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Crypto World
AMC CEO calls Robinhood stock token contemptible and vile
Adam Aron discovered that Robinhood had tokenized AMC stock on its own blockchain without telling anyone at AMC. His reaction set off a corporate brawl that exposed the biggest unresolved question in tokenized finance: who gets to decide what happens to your stock?
Summary
- AMC CEO Adam Aron called Robinhood’s tokenized AMC stock “contemptible, outrageous, disgusting, detestable, inexcusable, vile” after discovering the listing on Robinhood Chain without AMC’s knowledge or consent.
- AMC shares surged 21% overnight to $3.07 as the public feud between Aron and Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev played out on X, with Tenev responding “What’s the concern?” and Robinhood’s chief legal officer sarcastically offering to teach AMC’s lawyers securities law.
- Robinhood tokenized more than 190 companies through Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, a Channel Islands affiliate operating outside US securities registration, creating synthetic exposure instruments that carry no ownership rights, no voting power, and no shareholder protections.
- Aron described the situation as “almost existential,” arguing that AMC spends millions annually on SEC compliance while Robinhood recreates the same market exposure from an offshore jurisdiction 3,000 miles away with none of the same obligations.
- The SEC’s 24-hour trading roundtable on September 17, featuring BlackRock, Nasdaq, NYSE, Robinhood, and Citadel, now carries dramatically higher stakes as the AMC confrontation forces regulators to address tokenized stock instruments directly.
The call came from inside the house. Or more accurately, from a blockchain that AMC Entertainment’s leadership did not know existed until someone flagged a tokenized version of their stock trading on it.
Adam Aron has never been accused of underreaction. The AMC chief executive built a second career out of theatrical corporate communication during the meme stock era, turning earnings calls into spectacles and his X account into a direct line to retail investors who treated AMC shares like a lifestyle brand. But when Aron discovered that Robinhood had listed a tokenized version of AMC stock on Robinhood Chain, the platform’s proprietary blockchain that launched July 1, his reaction went past theater into something closer to genuine corporate rage.
“Contemptible, outrageous, disgusting, detestable, inexcusable, vile.” Six adjectives, posted publicly, each one a legal signal flare. Aron was not performing. He was building a record.
The confrontation that followed has cracked open a fault line that the crypto industry, traditional finance, and regulators have all been tiptoeing around for years. When a company can be tokenized without its consent, without registration, and without granting any of the rights that make stock ownership meaningful, the question stops being about technology and starts being about power. Specifically: who has it, who lost it, and whether the SEC intends to do anything about it before every public company in America wakes up to the same surprise Aron did.
Adam Aron did not take it well
The timeline matters because it reveals how completely AMC was blindsided.
Robinhood Chain went live on July 1. Within weeks, it had accumulated $47 billion in cumulative DEX volume and was generating $4.01 million in daily revenue. The chain offered tokenized versions of stocks, and the list was not short. More than 190 companies were represented, all tokenized through Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, a subsidiary incorporated in the Channel Islands.
AMC was one of those 190 companies. Nobody at AMC knew. Aron found out the way most CEOs find out about things they should have been told about weeks earlier: someone on social media pointed it out. His response was immediate and volcanic. The six-adjective post on X was just the opening. Aron followed it with a series of statements that escalated from angry to existential, calling the tokenization “almost existential” for AMC and every other public company caught in the same trap.
His argument was straightforward and, stripped of the theatrics, difficult to dismiss. AMC spends millions of dollars every year on SEC compliance. Lawyers, auditors, filings, disclosures, all the machinery that public companies maintain to operate within the regulatory framework that governs US securities markets. Robinhood, Aron argued, had recreated the economic exposure of AMC stock from a jurisdiction 3,000 miles offshore, with none of the same obligations, none of the same costs, and none of the same accountability.
He threatened to bring the SEC into it. Given the timing, that threat carries more weight than it might have six months ago.
What Robinhood actually built
To understand why Aron reacted the way he did, you need to understand what these tokenized stocks actually are. And more critically, what they are not.
Robinhood’s stock tokens are tokenized debt securities. That distinction is everything. A tokenized debt security is not a share of stock. It does not convey ownership in the underlying company. It does not grant voting rights. It does not come with the shareholder protections embedded in decades of US securities law. It does not entitle the holder to dividends in the traditional sense, though some structures attempt to mirror dividend payments.
What it does is create synthetic exposure to the price movement of the underlying stock. If AMC goes up, your token goes up. If AMC goes down, your token goes down. You participate in the economics without participating in the governance, the legal framework, or the relationship between company and shareholder that US securities law was built to protect.
This is not a new concept. Contracts for difference, or CFDs, have operated on similar principles in European and Asian markets for decades. But CFDs are regulated instruments with clear regulatory frameworks in the jurisdictions where they trade. Robinhood’s stock tokens exist in a different category: issued by an offshore affiliate, not registered under US securities law, and explicitly unavailable to US persons.
That last point is where the legal architecture gets interesting. Robinhood, the US brokerage that millions of American retail investors use to trade stocks, operates Robinhood Chain through a Channel Islands entity specifically because the tokens cannot legally be offered to Americans. The same company that democratized stock trading for US retail is running a parallel securities infrastructure offshore that its US customers cannot access. The irony is thick enough to cut.
The Jersey loophole and why every public company should care
Jersey, the largest of the Channel Islands, is a Crown Dependency with its own legal system, its own financial regulator, and a long history as a domicile for offshore financial vehicles. It is not a tax haven in the cartoonish sense, but it is a jurisdiction deliberately designed to accommodate financial structures that do not fit neatly within the regulatory frameworks of larger economies.
Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited is the entity that issues the tokenized stock instruments. By incorporating in Jersey, Robinhood places the issuance outside the jurisdiction of the SEC, outside the reach of US securities registration requirements, and outside the compliance obligations that companies like AMC bear.
This is the piece that made Aron describe the situation as existential. The asymmetry is real. AMC files 10-Ks, 10-Qs, 8-Ks, proxy statements, and every other document the SEC requires. It pays for audits, legal counsel, and compliance infrastructure. It subjects itself to the full weight of US securities regulation because that is what public companies do.
Robinhood, through its Jersey affiliate, creates instruments that track AMC’s stock price without bearing any of those costs. The tokens are not registered. The issuer is not subject to SEC oversight for those instruments. And AMC has no say in whether its stock gets tokenized, how the tokens are marketed, or what disclosures accompany them.
Aron is not wrong that this is a structural problem. If one company can do it, every company can. And if every company does, the result is a parallel securities market operating outside the regulatory framework that the traditional market depends on for legitimacy and investor protection.
The precedent implications reach beyond meme stocks. Apple, Tesla, Microsoft, and Nvidia are all on the list of 190 tokenized companies. Imagine Tim Cook discovering that a Jersey entity is issuing synthetic Apple exposure to global traders without Apple filing a single disclosure related to those instruments. The legal theory that permits AMC tokenization permits everything. And the companies that would have the resources and motivation to challenge it in court are the same companies whose stocks generate the most trading volume on Robinhood Chain.
The deeper structural question is who captures the economic value. When a global trader buys a tokenized AMC instrument, the fees go to Robinhood and its Jersey affiliate. AMC sees none of that revenue. The company bears the compliance costs that make its stock price credible, and a third party monetizes that credibility from an offshore jurisdiction. This is not a hypothetical concern. It is a business model built on top of someone else’s regulatory burden.
OpenAI raised the identical objection in 2025 when it discovered its own stock had been tokenized without consent. Nothing changed. The tokens stayed listed. The offshore structure stayed in place. The regulatory response was silence. That silence was not lost on the broader corporate legal community. Multiple law firms circulated memos to public company clients warning that their stocks could be next. The memos recommended monitoring but offered no clear legal remedy, which is itself a damning indictment of the current framework.
AMC is betting that louder noise produces a different outcome.
Vlad Tenev’s four-word dismissal
Tenev’s response to Aron’s tirade was four words: “What’s the concern?”
Read charitably, it was a genuine question from someone who sees tokenized stock exposure as an innovation that expands market access. Read less charitably, it was a provocation designed to make Aron look like he was overreacting to something harmless.
Either way, it was a miscalculation. Aron was already on a war footing, and “What’s the concern?” gave him exactly the ammunition he needed to frame Robinhood as dismissive of legitimate corporate interests.
But the real escalation came from Robinhood’s chief legal officer, Dan Gallagher. When AMC’s lawyers sent a cease-and-desist letter, Gallagher did not simply reject it. He rejected it with sarcasm, offering to teach AMC’s legal team about securities law. For a CLO responding to a formal legal demand from a public company CEO, that tone was a choice. It suggested that Robinhood’s legal team views AMC’s position as not just wrong but laughably wrong.
Gallagher is not some random corporate lawyer. He is a former SEC commissioner. His willingness to dismiss AMC’s legal position so publicly signals that Robinhood believes it is on solid legal ground. Whether the SEC agrees is a separate question that September 17 may begin to answer.
The exchange also revealed something about how Robinhood views the relationship between tokenized assets and traditional equity. In Tenev’s framing, tokenized stocks are a feature, not a threat. They expand access, create liquidity, and bring 24/7 trading to assets that are currently locked behind market hours and brokerage intermediaries. Robinhood is not apologizing for tokenizing AMC. It is confused about why anyone would object.
The case for Robinhood’s position
Dismissing Robinhood’s argument entirely would be intellectually dishonest, and the strongest version of their case deserves a full hearing.
Global markets do not operate on American hours. An investor in Singapore who wants exposure to AMC’s stock price should not have to wait for the New York Stock Exchange to open. Tokenized stock instruments solve a real problem: they create a 24/7 market for price exposure to assets that currently trade on schedules designed for a world that no longer exists.
The Channel Islands structure is not an attempt to evade regulation. It is an attempt to serve non-US customers in jurisdictions where these instruments are legal. Robinhood is not offering these tokens to Americans. The separation between Robinhood the US brokerage and Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited is deliberate and legally meaningful.
The tokens do not dilute AMC’s shares. They do not affect AMC’s share count, capital structure, or corporate governance. No new AMC shares are created. The economic exposure is synthetic. In this framing, Aron is objecting to the existence of a derivative instrument based on AMC’s publicly available stock price, which is a price that anyone with a Bloomberg terminal or a free brokerage app can already track and trade around.
CFD providers have offered similar products for decades without facing the kind of backlash Aron is generating. The tokenized version puts the same concept on a blockchain, which adds transparency, programmability, and composability with other DeFi protocols, but does not change the fundamental economic relationship.
Robinhood Chain’s numbers back up the demand thesis. Tokenized stocks hit $4.3 billion in 30-day volume. That is not a toy. That is a market telling you something about what global investors want.
And Gallagher’s confidence is not unfounded. The tokens are not US securities. They are not offered to US persons. The issuer is in a jurisdiction that permits them. The legal theory that AMC could force Robinhood to stop tokenizing its stock would require either a novel interpretation of existing law or new legislation. Neither exists today.
The 21% spike and the irony nobody is discussing
Here is the part that should make every participant in this drama uncomfortable.
AMC stock jumped 21% overnight, rising to $3.07, on the back of Aron’s public tantrum. The company’s market value increased by hundreds of millions of dollars because its CEO went on X and called another company’s product “vile.”
This is the meme stock dynamic in its purest form. The fundamentals of AMC’s business did not change. Its debt load did not shrink. Its box office numbers did not improve. Its streaming strategy did not suddenly become viable. What changed was attention, narrative, and the engagement of a retail investor base that has repeatedly shown it will buy AMC stock in response to drama, not data.
Aron knows this. He has spent four years cultivating exactly this dynamic. The man who embraced ape NFTs, promoted popcorn sales as corporate strategy, and turned shareholder meetings into rallies understands that attention is AMC’s most valuable asset.
Which raises an uncomfortable question: does Aron genuinely view tokenized stock as an existential threat, or does he recognize that fighting Robinhood publicly generates exactly the kind of attention that moves AMC’s stock price?
Both things can be true simultaneously. The legal concerns are legitimate. The compliance asymmetry is real. The lack of consent is a genuine governance issue. But the 21% spike is also real, and it happened because Aron chose to wage this fight in public rather than through quiet legal channels.
The market, in its infinite and occasionally cruel wisdom, rewarded the drama. That reward makes it harder to separate the genuine corporate concern from the performance.
The September 17 collision
The SEC has scheduled a roundtable on 24-hour trading for September 17. The participant list reads like a roster of every entity that have direct stakes in how this plays out: BlackRock, Nasdaq, NYSE, Robinhood, and Citadel.
Before the Aron blowup, this roundtable was going to be a relatively contained discussion about extended trading hours, market structure, and the technical infrastructure needed to support longer or continuous trading sessions. That conversation still matters, but the AMC confrontation has injected a much more volatile question into the agenda: what is the regulatory status of tokenized stock instruments issued offshore but tied to US equities?
The Clarity Act vote scheduled for September 15 adds another layer. If that legislation moves forward, it could reshape the regulatory framework for digital assets in ways that either validate or undermine Robinhood’s offshore tokenization model.
Robinhood will be in the room on September 17. Gallagher’s former colleagues at the SEC will be running it. Aron will not be at the table, but his argument will be. Every commissioner, every staffer, and every market participant in that room will have read the X thread, the cease-and-desist, and the sarcastic rejection.
The question the SEC faces is whether tokenized stock instruments require a new regulatory framework, whether existing law already covers them, or whether the offshore structure genuinely places them outside US jurisdiction. Each answer leads to a dramatically different outcome for the $4.3 billion tokenized stock market.
If the SEC decides these instruments fall under its authority regardless of where they are issued, Robinhood’s entire stock tokenization business is at risk. If the SEC decides the offshore structure is legally sound, every other fintech company will race to replicate it. And if the SEC punts, which is always the most likely outcome, the ambiguity will persist and the next Adam Aron will have the same tantrum about the same problem six months from now.
The timing compounds the pressure. Robinhood Chain is less than three months old and already generating millions in daily revenue. Every week the SEC stays silent is a week in which the tokenized stock market grows larger, more liquid, and harder to unwind without causing its own set of market disruptions. Regulators who wait too long to act often discover that the market they intended to regulate has become too large to touch.
What to watch
- **The SEC roundtable on September 17** will reveal whether regulators view tokenized stock instruments as a market structure innovation or a compliance evasion, and Robinhood’s presence at the table means the conversation cannot avoid the topic.
- **AMC’s formal legal strategy** beyond the cease-and-desist will indicate whether Aron intends to pursue litigation, lobby for legislative intervention, or use the threat of both as leverage for a private resolution.
- **Other public company responses** will determine whether AMC is an outlier or the first of many, because 190 companies were tokenized and Aron is the only CEO who has said a word about it publicly.
- **Robinhood Chain’s volume trends** after the controversy will show whether negative attention drives traders away from tokenized stocks or attracts them, and early data from DeFi markets suggests controversy tends to increase volume rather than suppress it.
- **The Clarity Act vote on September 15** could reshape the entire regulatory environment two days before the SEC roundtable, creating either a framework that addresses tokenized stocks directly or a gap that leaves the current ambiguity intact.
What are tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain?
They are tokenized debt securities that track the price of real stocks. You do not own a piece of the company. You have zero voting rights and zero shareholder protections. What you get is synthetic price exposure, meaning your token moves with the stock price, but your legal relationship to the company is nonexistent.
Why was AMC’s CEO so angry about the tokenization?
Because nobody told him. AMC was one of 190 companies tokenized through a Robinhood offshore affiliate, and AMC’s entire leadership team found out through social media. Aron’s position is that AMC spends millions on SEC compliance while Robinhood recreates the same economic exposure from an offshore entity with none of those costs or obligations.
Can US investors buy these tokenized stocks?
No. The tokens are issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, a Channel Islands entity, and they are not registered under US securities law. They cannot legally be offered to US persons. This is the same Robinhood that US retail investors use for stock trading, but the tokenized stock product is walled off from American customers.
Did AMC stock actually go up because of this fight?
It did. AMC shares jumped 21% overnight to $3.07 after Aron’s public outburst on X. The irony is hard to miss: Aron was arguing that tokenized stocks threaten AMC, while the fight over those tokens was the best thing to happen to AMC’s stock price in months.
What did Robinhood’s legal team say to AMC’s cease-and-desist?
Robinhood CLO Dan Gallagher, a former SEC commissioner, rejected the demand and sarcastically offered to educate AMC’s lawyers on securities law. The tone was deliberately dismissive, signaling that Robinhood views AMC’s legal position as baseless.
Has any other company objected to being tokenized on Robinhood Chain?
OpenAI raised the same objection in 2025 when it found its stock tokenized without consent. The response was effectively nothing. The tokens remained listed, the offshore structure stayed in place, and no regulatory action followed. AMC is trying to get a different result with a much louder approach.
What happens at the SEC roundtable on September 17?
The roundtable was originally about 24-hour trading, with BlackRock, Nasdaq, NYSE, Robinhood, and Citadel participating. The AMC controversy has reframed the stakes. The central question is now whether tokenized stock instruments issued offshore but tied to US equities fall under SEC authority, and the answer will shape the future of a market that already moves $4.3 billion in 30-day volume.
Could this lead to new regulation of tokenized assets?
It could, and the Clarity Act vote on September 15 adds urgency. But regulatory timelines move slowly, and the SEC has a long track record of studying problems rather than solving them. The most likely near-term outcome is that the ambiguity persists, Robinhood continues operating through its Jersey entity, and more public companies discover they have been tokenized without their knowledge. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always consult a qualified professional before making investment decisions. Published Sept. 4, 2026.
-
Crypto World21 hours agoBitcoin price stalls near $82K as key resistance holds
-
Politics21 hours agoBest Gaming Laptops, CPUs, TVs, And Keyboards To Upgrade Your Set Up For GTA VI
-
Tech22 hours agoThe Birds Outside, Drawn For You Automatically
-
Crypto World1 day agoIMF Says El Salvador’s Post-Review Bitcoin Purchases Used No Public Funds
-
Crypto World21 hours agoU.S. added stronger than expected 162,000 jobs in August as labor market bounced back
-
Sports1 day agoAlexandre Pato consortium’s Northampton Town investment approved
-
Sports20 hours agoGolden Eaglets Drawn in Group B for 2026 WAFU B U17 Championship
-
Sports1 day agoCommanders’ Chig Okonkwo is a top breakout fantasy football candidate
-
Crypto World19 hours agoXRP price breaks falling channel as bulls target $1.53
-
Politics1 day agoA new European chapter for Gibraltar
-
Politics23 hours agoThe House | Bin the lectures, bring gossip and be ready to banter: how the new PM should prepare for his Trump encounter
-
Politics19 hours agoHow To Avoid Winter Colds: 4 Everyday Habits That Spread Germs, Says Pharmacist
-
Crypto World20 hours agoFrom warning to listing: UK’s largest retail investment platform opens access to crypto ETNs
-
Tech21 hours agoA Worthy Android Ereader, With Some Tradeoffs
-
Crypto World20 hours agoFinCEN flags $12.7B tied to Southeast Asia crypto investment scams
-
Crypto World20 hours agoTrezor Data Breach Impacts 67,000 More US Customers
-
Politics1 day ago33 Cosy Autumn Home Decor Ideas: Blankets, Pumpkin Decorations, And Candles
-
Sports1 day agoSeven wickets in 21 balls: Sri Lanka’s Chamari Athapaththu scripts history with record-breaking spell
-
Tech21 hours agoHow To Edit Claude’s Memory
-
Tech20 hours agobeyerdynamic AVENTHO Y Debuts at IFA 2026 and Makes Wireless Headphones Less Disposable


You must be logged in to post a comment Login