Connect with us

Crypto World

Nvidia’s Huang argues AI creates jobs, not destroys them, in rare blog post

Published

on

Nvidia's Huang argues AI creates jobs, not destroys them, in rare blog post

The AI jobs debate got its sharpest rebuttal yet on Tuesday, from the person selling the hardware.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang published a rare standalone essay on Tuesday laying out what he calls the “five-layer cake” of AI infrastructure: energy at the base, then chips, then physical infrastructure, then models, then applications.

It positioned AI not as a software product or a chatbot but as an industrial buildout on the scale of electrification, one that requires trillions of dollars in physical construction and a massive workforce of electricians, plumbers, pipefitters, steelworkers, and network technicians.

“These are skilled, well-paid jobs, and they are in short supply. You do not need a PhD in computer science to participate in this transformation,” he said.

Advertisement

Huang’s argument for why the buildout needs to be so large starts with a fundamental shift in how computing works.

Traditional software retrieves stored instructions, while AI generates new outputs in real time, with every response created fresh based on the context provided. It isn’t looking up an answer, but instead, reasons through one on demand.

Because intelligence is produced in real time, the entire computing stack beneath it has to be reinvented, which is why AI requires purpose-built infrastructure from the energy layer up rather than running on existing data centers.

The timing is pointed. The essay arrives after weeks of mounting anxiety about AI’s impact on employment, from Block Inc.’s mass layoffs to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s comments about job displacement. Tech stocks had been selling off on the combination of those fears since early this year.

Advertisement

Huang’s essay is a direct counter-narrative, however. He used radiology as his example, arguing that AI assists with reading scans but demand for radiologists keeps growing because productivity creates capacity and capacity creates growth. “That is not a paradox,” he wrote.

Huang puts energy as the the foundation of the AI era.

“Intelligence generated in real time requires power generated in real time,” he wrote. “Energy is the first principle of AI infrastructure and the binding constraint on how much intelligence the system can produce.”

That framing has implications beyond Nvidia’s supply chain. If energy is the binding constraint on AI, then anything that disrupts energy supply, including the current war in the Middle East, isn’t just a macro headwind for markets. It’s a direct bottleneck on how fast AI can scale.

Huang acknowledged the buildout is still early. “We are a few hundred billion dollars into it. Trillions of dollars of infrastructure still need to be built,” he said, adding that AI factories are being constructed “at unprecedented scale” around the world.

Advertisement

He also gave a notable nod to open-source models, citing DeepSeek-R1 as an example of how making strong reasoning models freely available “accelerated adoption at the application layer and increased demand for training, infrastructure, chips, and energy beneath it.” Open-source doesn’t threaten Nvidia’s business. It feeds it.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War

Published

on

🔀

The correlation between Bitcoin (BTC) and gold has snapped under the pressure of the Iran conflict, according to a note to investors by JPMorgan.

While geopolitical instability usually drives a unified bid for safe havens, the two assets are currently moving in opposite directions.

This decoupling reveals a significant shift in how capital is treating “digital gold” versus the real thing.

Instead of moving in tandem as crisis hedges, investors are aggressively rotating capital, creating a clear winner in the ETF market since late February.

Advertisement

Discover: The best crypto to buy now

What the JPMorgan ETF Flow Data Actually Shows About Bitcoin

Since the conflict escalated on Feb. 27, JPMorgan analysts report a stark divergence in capital flows. The largest gold ETF, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), has bled outflows totaling roughly 2.7% of its assets under management.

In contrast, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) absorbed inflows equaling roughly 1.5% of its assets during the same window.

JPMorgan analysts, led by Managing Director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, highlighted in their recent note to investors that this reverses the trend seen earlier in the year when gold funds held the advantage.

The data is unambiguous. While gold has traditionally been the default safety trade during Middle East tensions, capital is currently voting for Bitcoin exposure.

Institutional positioning generally reflects a shift away from bullion in favor of the spot Bitcoin ETFs, despite the higher volatility inherent in crypto assets.

Advertisement

Interestingly, IBIT inflows since the start of 2024 are now roughly double the total accumulation seen by GLD, further cementing the shift in dominance among exchange-traded products.

Is Bitcoin Replacing Gold as the Crisis Hedge?

The divergence goes deeper than headline flows. JPMorgan notes that while spot Bitcoin ETFs are seeing inflows, institutional derivatives markets paint a more cautious picture. Hedge funds appear to be reducing direct Bitcoin exposure even as ETF buyers step up.

Short interest in IBIT has actually increased since the conflict began, while GLD short interest declined. This narrows the gap between the two, suggesting that hedge funds are hedging their crypto bets while favoring gold for pure defensive positioning.

Advertisement

This creates a complex market structure. Retail and registered investment advisors (RIAs) are likely driving the ETF bid, treating Bitcoin as a risk-off asset alongside the dollar. Meanwhile, sophisticated desks are hedging downside risk as oil surges past $100, a macro factor that typically pressures risk assets.

Options activity supports this cautious institutional stance. The demand for downside protection in Bitcoin has risen, contrasting with the relentless buying pressure in the spot ETF market. However, the sheer magnitude of the rotation, selling gold to buy Bitcoin, suggests the “digital gold” narrative is holding up under fire better than skeptics anticipated.

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Can BTC Hold the $70,000 Level?

Advertisement

Price action remains resilient despite the mixed signals from derivatives markets. Even with war-driven inflation fears dominating the headlines, Bitcoin is trading above $70,000, showing strength where legacy assets have faltered.

JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War
Source: TradingView

Bull Scenario: If ETF inflows persist at this 1.5% pace, Bitcoin targets the $80,000 resistance band. Clearing that level opens the path to retest all-time highs. JPMorgan’s own valuation models have previously flagged Bitcoin as undervalued relative to gold regarding volatility-adjusted capital, suggesting room for an upside squeeze.

Bear Scenario: Should macro liquidity tighten further, support sits firm at $64,000. A break below this level would validate the rising short interest and likely force a flush of the recent leverage. Traders must watch the $70,000 midpoint closely; losing it would signal that the safe-haven bid has exhausted itself.

The next major catalyst isn’t just on the chart; it’s at the Federal Reserve. If oil prices stay high, inflationary pressure could force central banks to keep rates elevated longer, testing the resilience of both gold and Bitcoin.

Discover: The next crypto to explode

Advertisement

The post JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hong Kong to Approve First Stablecoin Licenses for Banks

Published

on

Hong Kong to Approve First Stablecoin Licenses for Banks

HSBC Holdings and a joint venture led by Standard Chartered are reportedly set to become the first authorized stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is expected to issue stablecoin licenses to HSBC and Standard Chartered, the South China Morning Post reported Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. HSBC and Standard Chartered are set to be in the first batch as authorities reportedly prioritize institutions already authorized to issue banknotes in the city.

The Hong Kong government, through the HKMA, authorizes banknote issuance to three commercial banks, including local branches of HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has not confirmed the names of any successful applicants. Standard Chartered declined to comment, and HSBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The approvals would mark a major step toward Hong Kong’s ambition to become a global digital asset hub despite neighboring mainland China reportedly making it harder to launch stablecoins in the region.

HKMA targets the first stablecoin licenses in March

According to the SCMP, the number of licenses and timetable had yet to be finalized and remained subject to change, but the sources indicated a possible date on March 24.

Though unconfirmed, potential stablecoin issuer licenses for HSBC and Standard Chartered would align with earlier reports that the HKMA planned to grant the first licenses in March 2026.

Hong Kong has not yet approved any stablecoin issuer. Source: HKMA

HKMA Chief Executive Eddie Yue said in February that the regulator expects the first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses to include a “very small number” of issuers.

The Hong Kong government enforced the Stablecoin Ordinance, a statutory framework for regulating stablecoins, in August 2025, making it illegal to offer or promote unlicensed fiat-referenced stablecoins to retail investors.

Advertisement

Related: China’s Alibaba joins stablecoin platform MetaComp’s $35M fundraise

In September, the HKMA said it received applications from 36 institutions for a license to issue stablecoins. HSBC and Standard Chartered were among the institutions that were reported to be planning to apply, alongside the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

Magazine: China’s ‘50x’ blockchain boost, Alibaba-linked AI mines Bitcoin: Asia Express