Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Polymarket users try manipulate Israeli journalist with death threats, report

Published

on

Polymarket users try manipulate Israeli journalist with death threats, report

Polymarket users reportedly threatened to kill an Israeli journalist after his coverage of an Iranian missile strike in Israel apparently jeopardised a number of big-money wagers.

On March 10 Emanuel Fabian, a reporter for the Times of Israel, covered an Iranian missile strike outside of the city of Beit Shemesh as the war between the US and Israel, and Iran raged on.  

However, Fabian revealed today that his coverage was met with a barrage of demands, threats, and misinformation from apparent Polymarket users.

The first email he received, written in Hebrew, asked him to change his report to state that the “missile” was instead a fragment from one of Israel’s missile interceptors.

Advertisement

The email claimed this was the finding of the Beit Shemesh municipality and Israel’s national medical emergency body. However, rather than retract is report, Fabian, doubled down, clarifying that, based on reports from the Israeli military and footage of the strike, the incident involved a missile warhead and not interceptor fragments. 

Fabian claimed the footage shows an explosion consistent with a warhead packed with hundreds of kilograms of explosives.

Read more: Nigel Farage aide George Cottrell bets US war will last four more months

He continued to receive emails and messages from Discord and WhatsApp users asking him to make the same correction.

Fabian then noticed that multiple X accounts involved with Polymarket gambling were replying to his posts with similar correction demands. 

He deduced that his harassers were trying to resolve a bet on Polymarket, with $14 million worth of volume, that asked if Iran would strike Israel on March 10.  

Advertisement

The respondents appeared desperate for the strike to be classified as fragments of an interceptor, as that would resolve the market to “No.”

Polymarket users threatened to kill Israeli journalist

Five days after the missile struck, the demands became more threatening. 

One WhatsApp user named “Haim” threatened to kill Fabian unless he changed his reporting, and repeatedly gave him correction deadlines. 

“After you make us lose $900,000 we will invest no less than that to finish you,” one of Haim’s messages read.

Advertisement

Another said, “You are choosing to go to war knowing that you will lose your life as you’ve grown accustomed to it — for nothing.” 

Haim then began to list specific details related to Fabian’s family and home in another threat to his life.

Read more: Kalshi uses ‘death carve-out’ to avoid paying out on Ali Khamenei ousting

Shortly after Haim’s messages, someone posing as a lawyer rang Fabian and told him that he was now the subject of an investigation into his supposed Polymarket market manipulation. 

Advertisement

Fabian ended the call and reported the situation to the police, who are now investigating his claims.

Fabian concerned journalists might be weak to Polymarket users

Fabian wrote, “The attempt by these gamblers to pressure me to change my reporting so that they would win their bet did not and will not succeed.” 

He worries, however, that “other journalists may not be as ethical if they are promised some of the winnings.” 

Indeed, he detailed how one of his colleagues from another publication was approached by someone asking him to encourage Fabian to change the details of the story. 

Advertisement

Fabian informed them about the Polymarket bet, and his colleague confronted the individual, who admitted they’d placed a bet on Iran not being struck by Israel.

The confronted individual reportedly offered a cut of his winnings to Fabian’s colleague if they managed to convince Fabian to make the correction. 

At the time of writing, the Polymarket bet is still unresolved and is waiting for a final resolution from UMA, the platform’s oracle system which allows tokenholders to resolve disputes about various outcomes.

The price of the “Yes” odds changed as the results continued to be disputed.

Read more: Are Polymarket and Kalshi decentralized?

It now has over $15 million in volume and has resolved to “Yes” twice in the past two resolutions.

Advertisement

Prediction markets rife with insider trading

Fabian’s story offers a glimpse into the scale of insider trading on Polymarket and tactics employed by bettors to pressure people with the power to sway a market. 

Polymarket and Kalshi both host bets on the outcomes and potential for military action, as well as pop culture happenings and sports bets

Several large and timely bets made before military actions have prompted suspicions of rampant insider trading and leaking of confidential documents. 

Just last month, Israel’s government arrested one of its reserve soldiers and an associate of theirs in connection with a series of Polymarket bets that gambled on Israel striking Iran in 2025.

Advertisement

The pair is suspected of using secret information to make the bets and, in the process, threaten the national security of Israel.

Protos has reached out to Fabian for comment and will update this piece should we hear anything back. 

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

XRP (XRP) Sees Whale Accumulation Despite 60% Drop From Peak

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Takeaways

  • XRP currently trades in the $1.30–$1.33 range, marking a decline exceeding 60% from its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65
  • Total addresses on the XRP Ledger have surged to a new milestone of 8.1 million
  • Wallets holding over 1 million XRP tokens are increasing for the first time since September 2025
  • Critical price resistance level stands at $1.35, with a breakout potentially driving momentum toward $1.40
  • The U.S. Senate is expected to vote on the CLARITY Act in April 2026, which could serve as a significant market catalyst

As of early April 2026, XRP maintains a trading range between $1.30 and $1.33, reflecting a sustained downturn from its peak valuation of $3.65 reached in July 2025. This decline translates to a value reduction exceeding 60% across approximately nine months of trading.

[[IMG_6]]
XRP Price

While the token’s price has experienced significant contraction, blockchain metrics from CryptoQuant reveal that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) has achieved a new benchmark with 8,189,798 total addresses. This figure represents a quarterly growth rate of 3.39% during the first three months of 2026.

A notable shift in holder behavior has emerged: wallets containing 1 million or more XRP tokens have started increasing for the first time since September 2025. Market observers interpret this trend as evidence that major stakeholders are actively accumulating during the price weakness.

Additional network developments include the expansion of automated market maker pools on the XRPL to approximately 28,000. The ecosystem has also broadened its reach through strategic collaborations, including a notable integration with Mastercard’s payment infrastructure.

Advertisement

Technical analyst ChartNerd (@ChartNerdTA) published commentary on X earlier this week, identifying XRP’s movement within a descending channel pattern characterized by progressively lower peaks and troughs. The analyst highlighted that the Relative Strength Index remains beneath neutral territory while trading volume lacks significant expansion, describing the action as “a weak continuation” instead of healthy consolidation.

Technical Analysis and Critical Price Zones

Recent price action shows XRP penetrating above a bearish trend line positioned at $1.3085 on the one-hour timeframe, subsequently advancing beyond the 50% Fibonacci retracement level calculated from the recent swing ranging from $1.3678 to $1.2801.

Current price action maintains support above the $1.33 threshold and the 100-hour Simple Moving Average. Buying pressure attempted to push toward $1.3480 but encountered selling pressure at that level.

The primary resistance barrier stands at $1.35. A decisive close above this level could establish momentum toward $1.40, followed by subsequent targets at $1.4120 and $1.4250. Conversely, downside support zones are identified at $1.3240, $1.32, and a more substantial floor at $1.28.

Legislative Developments May Influence Price Trajectory

The most significant upcoming event for April 2026 centers on the U.S. Senate’s scheduled review of the CLARITY Act. Should this legislation receive approval, it would officially designate XRP as a digital commodity under regulatory frameworks.

Market analysts project that successful passage of this bill could trigger a price recovery, potentially driving valuations into the $1.65–$1.80 territory.

Advertisement

Trading data from April 6, 2026, shows XRP maintaining levels above $1.33, with bullish participants working to overcome the pivotal $1.35 resistance threshold that will likely dictate the subsequent price direction.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

North Korean Hackers Infiltrated Crypto For Seven Years

Published

on

North Korean Hackers Infiltrated Crypto For Seven Years

North Korean IT workers have been embedding themselves in crypto companies and decentralized finance projects for at least seven years, according to a cybersecurity analyst.

“Lots of DPRK IT workers built the protocols you know and love, all the way back to DeFi summer,” said MetaMask developer and security researcher Taylor Monahan on Sunday. 

Monahan claimed that over 40 DeFi platforms, some being well-known names, have had North Korean IT workers working on their protocols.

The “seven years of blockchain dev experience” on their resume is “not a lie,” she added.

Advertisement

The Lazarus Group is a North Korean-affiliated hacking collective that has stolen an estimated $7 billion in crypto since 2017, according to analysts at creator network R3ACH. 

It has been linked to the industry’s highest-profile hacks, including the $625 million Ronin Bridge exploit in 2022, the $235 million WazirX hack in 2024 and the $1.4 billion Bybit heist in 2025.

Monahan’s comments came just hours after the Drift Protocol said it had “medium-high confidence” that the recent $280 million exploit against it was carried out by a North Korean state-affiliated group.

DeFi execs speak up on DPRK infiltration attempts

Tim Ahhl, founder of the Titan Exchange, a Solana-based DEX aggregator, said that in a previous job, “we interviewed someone who turned out to be a Lazarus operative.”

Advertisement

Ahhl said the candidate “did video calls and was extremely qualified.” He declined an in-person interview and they later discovered his name in a Lazarus “info dump.” 

The US Office of Foreign Assets Control has a website where crypto businesses can screen counterparties against updated OFAC sanctions lists and be alert to patterns consistent with IT worker fraud. 

Lazarus Group attack timeline. Source: R3ACH Network

Related: Drift Protocol says $280M exploit took ‘months of deliberate preparation’

Drift Protocol targeted by DPRK third-party intermediaries 

Drift Protocol’s postmortem on last week’s $280 million exploit also pointed to North Korean-affiliated hackers for the attack.

However, it said the face-to-face meetings that eventually led to the exploit were not with North Korean nationals, but rather “third-party intermediaries” with “fully constructed identities including employment histories, public-facing credentials, and professional networks.”

Advertisement

“Years later, and it seems Lazarus now has non-NKs [North Koreans] working for them to con people in person,” said Ahhl. 

Threats via job interviews are not sophisticated

Lazarus Group is the collective name for “all DPRK state-sponsored cyber actors,” explained blockchain sleuth ZachXBT on Sunday.

“The main issue is that everyone groups them all together when the complexity of threats is different,” he added. 

ZachXBT said that threats via job postings, LinkedIn, email, Zoom, or interviews are “basic and in no way sophisticated … the only thing about it is they’re relentless.”

Advertisement

“If you or your team still falls for them in 2026, you’re very likely negligent,” he said. 

There are two types of attack vectors, one more sophisticated than the other. Source: ZachXBT

Magazine: No more 85% Bitcoin collapses, Taiwan needs BTC war reserve: Hodler’s Digest