Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

SEC and CFTC Sign Memo to Harmonize Crypto and Other Markets

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Regulators in the United States are signaling a pivot from fragmented supervision toward a more coordinated approach to oversee evolving markets. In a joint memorandum released this week, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said it is a pivotal moment to regulate harmoniously as new technologies—especially crypto—reshape how markets function. The document emphasizes that “new trading models, digital infrastructure, and onchain, automated systems increasingly blur traditional jurisdictional lines,” creating a need for consistent, technology-neutral rules that can cover participants operating across platforms and asset classes. The joint effort aims to reduce duplication, close gaps, and accelerate the path to regulatory clarity.

Key takeaways

  • The SEC and CFTC formalized a cooperative framework through a memorandum of understanding to coordinate oversight across crypto, digital assets, and related financial technology.
  • The agencies commit to providing regulatory clarity and certainty grounded in technology-neutral regulations, alongside a shared data approach on issues of common regulatory interest.
  • A “minimum effective dose” regulatory strategy will be pursued to foster innovation while safeguarding market integrity and competitiveness on a global stage.
  • The memo references ongoing efforts to build a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for crypto assets and lists existing initiatives such as a crypto-specific task force and an advisory committee to shepherd innovation.
  • The document underscores the intent to reduce turf wars that have long tied up regulatory progress and pushed activity to other jurisdictions.

Tickers mentioned:

Market context: The move comes as the U.S. regulatory landscape weighs how to supervise a rapidly evolving crypto ecosystem amid questions about liquidity, risk management, and the integration of blockchain-based infrastructure with traditional markets. The coordination effort aligns with broader policy conversations about stabilizing the regulatory backdrop for platforms that span trading, clearing, data services, and pooled investment vehicles, while attempting to maintain U.S. competitiveness in a fast-changing global environment.

Sentiment: Neutral

Market context: The joint approach is positioned to influence how market participants operate across venues and asset classes, potentially shaping future product design and compliance pathways.

Advertisement

Price impact: Neutral. The memorandum outlines regulatory intent rather than immediate market actions, though clarity can influence investment planning and capital allocation over time.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The framework’s emphasis on clarity and proportionate regulation may encourage cautious entry as participants await concrete guidance and implementing rules.

Market context: In the broader crypto environment, policymakers have signaled that a stable, predictable regulatory regime is conducive to attracting institutional participation while preserving safeguards against misuse and market abuses.

Why it matters

The memorandum marks a notable shift in how two principal U.S. regulators approach an industry that has long challenged traditional supervisory paradigms. By committing to a technology-neutral regulatory posture, the SEC and CFTC aim to shield investors and market participants from duplicative requirements while ensuring that new trading models—whether on centralized exchanges, cross-border platforms, or on-chain systems—operate within a coherent framework. The emphasis on harmonization is especially meaningful as market participants increasingly move assets and data across platforms, including trading venues, clearinghouses, data repositories, and other intermediaries that span both securities and derivatives landscapes.

Advertisement

The agencies are explicit about their intent to share information and data on issues of “common regulatory interest,” a move that could improve how authorities monitor systemic risk, detect fraud, and respond to emerging technologies such as smart-contracts and automated trading systems. In parallel, the memo signals a broader effort to craft a “fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for crypto assets,” signaling that policy makers recognize crypto-specific dynamics within the wider financial system. The move builds on prior steps, including the establishment of a crypto-focused task force and advisory bodies intended to keep pace with innovation while preserving market integrity. The tone of the document—emphasizing clarity, predictability, and collaboration—aims to reduce the jurisdictional friction that has historically complicated compliance and innovation alike.

As SEC chair Paul Atkins framed it, the legacy of misaligned rules and overlapping registrations created an environment where innovation sometimes sought refuge offshore or migrated to jurisdictions with clearer expectations. The quote underscores a long-running frustration: “For decades, regulatory turf wars, duplicative agency registrations, and different sets of regulations between the SEC and CFTC have stifled innovation and pushed market participants to other jurisdictions.” By acknowledging that friction and pledging a more coordinated approach, the agencies are signaling a potential rebound in U.S. competitiveness in the crypto arena while maintaining robust supervisory standards.

The scope of the plan extends beyond crypto alone. The memo notes that the new regulatory posture will touch a broad spectrum of market activity—from trading platforms to clearinghouses, data repositories, and even pooled investment vehicles and intermediaries that operate across securities and derivatives frameworks. In doing so, it aligns regulatory objectives with the realities of digital rails, on-chain settlement, and cross-asset trading that have increasingly blurred traditional borders. The effort also reflects ongoing efforts to ensure technology-driven innovation—across crypto and AI—remains embedded within U.S. policy while avoiding a blanket deregulation that could invite abuse. The intention is to foster a dynamic, globally competitive market environment with clear guardrails for participants at every level of the value chain.

Overall, the memorandum presents a practical, measured approach to reform. It acknowledges the importance of regulatory clarity and a transparent, consistent framework as prerequisites for sustained innovation, while preserving the safeguards that have been central to U.S. market integrity. The combined message from the SEC and CFTC is that the time is right to reduce fragmentation, adopt common standards where feasible, and accelerate the adoption of rules that reflect the realities of digital markets without stifling experimentation.

Advertisement

Source-linked remarks and the framing of this initiative underscore a broader policy conversation about how to balance innovation with investor protection. The collaboration signals a willingness to use data-driven insights to calibrate rules rather than relying on static templates that fail to account for rapid technological evolution. As the crypto landscape continues to evolve—with new protocols, asset classes, and onchain activity—the joint MOU could become a cornerstone of a more predictable regulatory environment for market participants and builders alike.

The memorandum notes that the agencies have already undertaken and supported various initiatives in pursuit of these goals, including a crypto-specific task force and an advisory committee designed to ensure that crypto, AI, and other emerging technologies continue to advance in the United States. This alignment of policy instruments with a forward-looking view on technology signals an intent to keep the U.S. at the cutting edge of global financial innovation while anchoring it with robust governance and risk controls. The path forward will likely involve further policy statements, guidelines, and practical implementation steps that translate the memo’s principles into day-to-day compliance and product development decisions for a wide range of market participants.

In sum, the MOU represents more than a symbolic gesture. It aims to convert long-standing aspirational goals—coherence, clarity, and competitive vitality—into a tangible regulatory posture that can accommodate a rapidly changing market landscape. By emphasizing minimum regulatory levers that deliver the desired outcomes, the agencies hope to avoid stifling innovation while ensuring that the rules stay fit for purpose as technology, markets, and participants continue to evolve.

What to watch next

  • Publication of a detailed joint framework or guidance clarifying how crypto assets fit within the securities and commodities regimes.
  • Updates to data-sharing protocols and information exchange between the SEC and CFTC, particularly around surveillance and enforcement coordination.
  • Formation or expansion of the crypto-specific task force and advisory committees with specific governance and reporting milestones.
  • Regulatory actions or policy statements that reflect the “minimum effective dose” approach and how it will be applied to new products and platforms.

Sources & verification

  • Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, sec.gov/files/mou-sec-cftc-2026.pdf
  • SEC/CFTC press release announcing the historic memorandum, sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-26-sec-cftc-announce-historic-memorandum-understanding-between-agencies
  • Cointelegraph piece on regulatory clarity for crypto industry and related policy discussions, https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-industry-us-clarity-act-community-banks-stablecoin-yields
  • Cointelegraph article discussing CFTC chair and blockchain/prediction markets, https://cointelegraph.com/news/cftc-chair-backs-blockchain-prediction-markets-truth-machines
  • Cointelegraph Magazine feature exploring Clarity Act risks and regulatory missteps in Europe, https://cointelegraph-magazine.com/clarity-act-micas-defi-mistake-lawyer-warns/

Coordinated oversight marks a new phase for U.S. crypto policy

In a joint memorandum that frames its purpose around the need for clearer, more harmonized rules, the two agencies describe a strategic shift toward cooperation that could redefine how digital assets and related technologies are supervised in the United States. The document reinforces a commitment to provide regulatory clarity that covers the entire stack—from on-chain trading and data infrastructure to off-chain venues and the regulated products that span securities and derivatives. The stated aim is to reduce duplication, close jurisdictional gaps, and foster a regulatory environment where innovation can flourish under predictable guardrails. While the tone is cautious, the emphasis on data-sharing and mutual recognition signals a move away from legacy rigidity toward a more integrated, responsive approach to a market that has grown increasingly cross-border and technologically sophisticated.

The public rationale centers on practical governance: align enforcement expectations, avoid conflicting registrations, and harmonize how market participants across platforms operate under one ecosystem of rules. The collaboration is presented as a necessary modernization to keep pace with rapid advances in digital infrastructure, automated trading, and onchain settlement that now link traditional financial activities with decentralized technologies. It is a step toward a more coherent U.S. policy stance, one that acknowledges the gravity of cross-cutting innovations while maintaining robust protections for investors and market integrity.

Advertisement

Crucially, the memo does not suggest deregulation. Instead, it emphasizes a calibrated approach—what the agencies describe as a “minimum effective dose” strategy—intended to achieve policy objectives with the least intrusive regime that still deters misuse and preserves market health. If implemented effectively, this framework could reduce the fragmentation that has historically hindered cross-venue activity and could accelerate product development, while ensuring that oversight remains fit for purpose in a fast-moving landscape.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Circle faces backlash after $285 million Drift hack

Published

on

Circle (CRCL) may rally another 60% driven by stablecoin adoption, AI agentic finance: Bernstein

After the $285 million Drift hack, the focus is shifting to Circle (CRCL) and whether it could have done more to stop the money.

The attacker siphoned off roughly $71 million in USDC as part of the exploit Wednesday, according to blockchain security firm PeckShield. After converting most of the rest of the stolen assets to USDC, the hacker used Circle’s cross-chain transfer protocol, CCTP, to bridge about $232 million in USDC from Solana to Ethereum, making recovery efforts more difficult.

That movement has drawn criticism from parts of the crypto community, including prominent blockchain investigator ZachXBT, who argued Circle could have acted faster to limit the damage.

“Why should crypto businesses continue to build on Circle when a project with 9 fig[ure] TVL [total value locked] could not get support during a major incident?,” he said in an X post following the attack.

Advertisement

To freeze or not to freeze

The company had tools at its disposal, ZachXBT pointed out. Under its own terms, Circle reserves the right to blacklist addresses and freeze USDC tied to any suspicious activity.

Preemptively freezing wallets linked to the exploit could have slowed or stopped the attacker’s ability to move funds, one stablecoin infrastructure firm founder told CoinDesk.

However, acting without a court order or law enforcement request might expose Circle to legal risk, the person added.

Salman Banei, general counsel of tokenized asset network Plume, said freezing assets without formal authorization could expose issuers to liability if done incorrectly. He argued regulators should address that legal gap.

Advertisement

“Lawmakers should provide a safe harbor from civil liability if digital asset issuers freeze assets when, in their reasonable judgment, there is strong basis to believe that illicit transfers have occurred,” Banei said.

That constraint was central to the company’s response.

“Circle is a regulated company that complies with sanctions, law enforcement orders, and court-mandated requirements,” a spokesperson said in an email to CoinDesk. “We freeze assets when legally required, consistent with the rule of law and with strong protections for user rights and privacy.”

‘Gray zone’

The episode highlights a deeper tension that’s drawing increasing scrutiny as stablecoins grow.

Advertisement

Tokens like USDC are becoming a core part of global money flows, especially for cross-border payments and trading. At the same time, they are also used in illicit activity, putting issuers under pressure to act quickly when things go wrong.

According to TRM Labs, roughly $141 billion in stablecoin transactions in 2025 were linked to illicit activity, including sanctions evasion and money laundering.

Blockchain security firms pointed to North Korean hackers as likely being behind the Drift exploit.

Stablecoins issued by centralized, regulated entities like Circle’s USDC are designed to be programmable and controllable, a feature that can help stop illicit flows but could also raise concerns about overreach and due process.

Advertisement

In the Drift exploit’s case, the situation isn’t that clear-cut, said Ben Levit, founder and CEO of stablecoin ratings agency Bluechip.

“I think people are framing this too simplistically as ‘Circle should’ve frozen,’” he said. “This wasn’t a clean hack, it was more of a market/oracle exploit, which puts it in a gray zone.”

“So any action by Circle becomes a judgment call, not just a compliance decision,” he added.

To him, the bigger issue is consistency. “USDC can’t be positioned as neutral infrastructure while also allowing discretionary intervention without clear rules,” Levit said. “Markets can handle strict policies or no intervention, but ambiguity is much harder to price.”

Advertisement

That leaves issuers in a difficult position. Moving too slowly risks criticism that they are enabling bad actors, while acting too quickly without legal backing raises concerns about overreach.

And in fast-moving exploits, that trade-off becomes especially stark, with the window to act often measured in minutes rather than weeks or months of legal processes.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Community Banks Push Back on Coinbase Trust Charter Approval

Published

on

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States

The Independent Community Bankers of America has opposed the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) conditional approval of Coinbase’s national trust bank charter, warning the application falls short of regulatory standards and could pose risks to consumers and the financial system.

On Thursday, ICBA said Coinbase’s application shows deficiencies in risk controls, profitability and resolution planning, and argued the OCC lacks statutory authority to expand trust powers for crypto-related activities without applying the full set of banking regulations.

The group said the decision reflects a broader trend of nonbank entities seeking access to the benefits of bank charters without meeting the same regulatory requirements. It wrote:

The sudden influx of applications demonstrates nonbank entities are seeking the benefits of a US bank charter without satisfying the full scope of US bank regulations.

Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund also criticized the decision, warning the approval departs from longstanding banking law and could expose the financial system to risks tied to crypto market volatility, fraud and money laundering.

Advertisement

The objections follows the OCC’s conditional approval on Thursday of Coinbase’s application to establish a national trust bank, after six months of review by the US regulator.

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States
Industry opposition to OCC’s Coinbase approval is growing. Source: Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund

Coinbase released a statement on Thursday saying the charter would bring its custody and market infrastructure business under federal oversight, emphasizing that it does not plan to hold customer deposits or engage in fractional reserve lending, and adding that “the right path forward for crypto is through the system — not around it.”

Related: Crypto awareness tops 80% among young people in UK: Coinbase survey

Stablecoin yield dispute stalls crypto market structure bill

The opposition is part of a broader dispute between banking groups and crypto companies over the role of digital assets in the financial system, particularly around stablecoins and yield-bearing products.

In January, CEO of Bank of America Brian Moynihan warned that allowing stablecoin issuers to offer interest could draw as much as $6 trillion in deposits out of the banking system, reducing lending capacity and pushing borrowing costs higher.

Advertisement

Industry groups such as the Bank Policy Institute have also raised similar concerns in letters to lawmakers, arguing that regulatory gaps could allow yield-bearing stablecoin products to bypass restrictions and disrupt traditional credit channels.

The debate is currently playing out in Washington, where Coinbase is engaged in policy discussions over the US Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a bill aimed at establishing federal rules for crypto oversight.

Coinbase, Banks, Bank of America, United States
Source: Brian Armstrong

While Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in January that the company could not support the legislation as drafted due to restrictions on stablecoin rewards, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said on Thursday that lawmakers are nearing agreement on core elements of the bill, though the yield issue remains a key sticking point.

The dispute has delayed a Senate Banking Committee markup, a required step before the bill can advance to a full Senate vote, leaving broader efforts to establish a federal framework for digital assets unresolved.

Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work

Advertisement