Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

ServiceNow (NOW) Stock: CEO Invests $3M Amid 32% Year-to-Date Decline

Published

on

NOW Stock Card

Key Highlights

  • ServiceNow (NOW) shares have declined approximately 32% year-to-date amid widespread SaaS sector pressure from AI disruption concerns
  • CEO Bill McDermott reports that half of new business revenue originates from non-seat-based pricing models, including AI token consumption
  • Benchmark launched coverage with a Buy recommendation and $125 price target, characterizing the decline as “unwarranted”
  • McDermott demonstrated confidence by purchasing $3 million in NOW shares during February, describing it as an optimal entry opportunity
  • Management projects 21% GAAP subscriber revenue expansion and identifies a $600 billion total addressable market opportunity

The shares of ServiceNow have experienced significant turbulence throughout 2026. With a decline of roughly 32% since the year began, the enterprise software provider has been swept up in a widespread retreat from SaaS investments that gained momentum in late 2025.


NOW Stock Card
ServiceNow, Inc., NOW

What sparked the exodus? Rapid advancements in AI capabilities from companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI exceeded market expectations, triggering investor anxiety that AI laboratories might erode traditional enterprise software demand.

CEO Bill McDermott challenges this interpretation. He maintains that ServiceNow differs fundamentally from conventional SaaS providers and is proactively pivoting toward AI integration rather than retreating from the technological shift.

“We’re not a feature company and we’re not a function company, we’re a platform company,” McDermott explained. He highlighted the company’s AI Control Tower solution, which orchestrates and oversees AI agents, models, and operational workflows throughout enterprise infrastructures.

Among McDermott’s most significant revelations: half of ServiceNow’s incoming business revenue derives from pricing structures unrelated to user seats. This marks the company’s first public disclosure of this metric.

Transitioning Beyond Per-Seat Licensing

The conventional software revenue model — billing based on individual user licenses — faces mounting challenges as artificial intelligence diminishes dependency on workforce expansion. ServiceNow is adopting a blended approach where clients pay for both user licenses and consumption-based AI tokens.

Advertisement

The strategy is clear: as the platform executes more autonomous functions, organizations purchase additional tokens. This decouples revenue expansion from employee headcount metrics.

Goldman Sachs analyst Gabriela Borges maintains a 12-month price target of $216 for NOW. She anticipates upward revisions to organic growth projections throughout the year as clients exhaust complimentary AI token allocations and transition to paid consumption after validating business value.

“Those packages are going to start getting burnt through, such that customers are now going to come back to ServiceNow and say, ‘Hey, we proved the value of this particular product. We are now ready to pay for it,’” Borges explained.

McDermott reinforced his optimism through action. During February, he acquired $3 million in NOW shares using personal funds.

Strategic Acquisitions and Market Expansion

ServiceNow has maintained an aggressive acquisition strategy recently. Last December, the company revealed plans for a $7.75 billion acquisition of cybersecurity provider Armis. Additional purchases included AI identity security specialist Veza and a $2.85 billion investment in Moveworks, a platform focused on AI assistance and reasoning agents.

Advertisement

During the Q4 earnings discussion, McDermott directly confronted shareholder concerns regarding acquisition velocity, emphasizing that purchases target innovation capabilities rather than revenue supplementation.

These strategic moves position ServiceNow more prominently within cybersecurity and customer relationship management sectors. McDermott asserts these expansions elevate the addressable market opportunity to at least $600 billion, a substantial increase from the $90 billion estimate when he assumed leadership in 2019.

On April 1, Benchmark launched coverage featuring a Buy rating alongside a $125 price target. Analyst Yi Fu Lee characterized the sell-off motivated by AI displacement concerns as “unwarranted” and positioned NOW as a primary beneficiary of the “Agentic AI super cycle.”

Wall Street consensus maintains a Buy recommendation for the company. ServiceNow’s price-to-earnings multiple registered approximately 61 times trailing 12-month earnings as of Thursday’s trading session.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) Stock: March Revenue Report Set to Test AI Supply Chain Limits

Published

on

TSM Stock Card

Key Takeaways

  • March 2026 revenue data from TSMC drops April 10, offering critical insight into whether supply can match AI chip demand
  • Revenue surged 37% year-over-year in January; February posted 22% YoY growth but fell 21% month-over-month due to seasonal patterns
  • Broadcom has publicly identified TSMC’s production capacity as a constraint limiting AI hardware rollouts
  • Taiwan’s energy dependence—importing roughly 95% of its supply—faces new threats from Middle East instability affecting the Strait of Hormuz
  • The chipmaker is scaling its U.S. presence with a massive $165 billion Arizona buildout featuring 12 fabrication and packaging facilities

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) stands at a critical juncture. The company’s March 2026 monthly sales figures, scheduled for release on April 10, will provide investors with crucial visibility into the health of AI semiconductor demand.


TSM Stock Card
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, TSM

This upcoming data release carries extra weight because it will reveal whether TSMC can translate explosive AI chip orders into actual production output. That question has grown increasingly complex in recent weeks.

For the better part of a year, the investment thesis around chip stocks has been straightforward: AI demand climbs, revenues climb with it. But that clean narrative is starting to fracture. Manufacturing bottlenecks and international tensions are now sharing the spotlight with order books.

TSMC commands approximately 72% of the worldwide contract chipmaking market, positioning it as the indispensable partner in the AI semiconductor ecosystem. Nvidia, Apple, and numerous other tech giants rely on TSMC’s cutting-edge manufacturing capabilities.

Recent financial performance has been robust. January 2026 sales climbed 37% compared to the prior year. February showed a 22% year-over-year increase, though monthly revenue declined 21% from January—a predictable seasonal dip rather than a warning sign.

Advertisement

Taken together, the first two months of 2026 demonstrated nearly 30% year-over-year revenue expansion. That momentum sets high expectations for the March figures.

Production Constraints Emerge as Primary Challenge

Broadcom hasn’t minced words: TSMC’s manufacturing capacity is creating a genuine constraint. As cloud providers and major corporations shift from AI pilots to production-scale implementations, the flood of chip orders is bumping against the physical limits of TSMC’s fabrication facilities.

This capacity squeeze is now intersecting with heightened international instability. Tensions involving Iran have interrupted energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz—a vital passage responsible for roughly 20% of worldwide petroleum and liquefied natural gas transport.

Taiwan relies on imports for approximately 95% of its energy needs, with natural gas accounting for about 48% of the island’s power generation mix. Any interruption to fuel deliveries creates immediate production risk for semiconductor manufacturing operations.

Advertisement

Compounding these challenges, a global helium shortage continues to intensify. Helium plays a critical role in chip production processes, and reduced supplies create another headwind for output volumes.

Massive U.S. Expansion Gains Momentum

On the capital investment front, TSMC is accelerating its American footprint. The company has expanded its Arizona commitment to $165 billion, outlining plans for a dozen wafer fabrication and chip packaging plants.

Capital spending for 2026 is forecast between $52 billion and $56 billion, fueled primarily by the expensive transition to advanced N2 process technology and the company’s worldwide facility expansion strategy.

Production costs in the United States run two to three times higher than comparable operations in Taiwan. Nevertheless, Taiwanese equipment and material suppliers are pressing forward—processing work visas, building local teams, and committing to long-term contracts despite compressed profit margins in the short term.

Advertisement

Supply chain partners who moved early are offering premium compensation packages to secure skilled workers, wagering that future production volumes will justify today’s elevated investment.

The April 10 revenue announcement will serve as the first significant indicator of whether TSMC’s manufacturing infrastructure can maintain pace with order flow—and whether the substantial Arizona investment is beginning to generate returns.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Senator asks if Binance lied to Congress about Iran

Published

on

US Senator asks if Binance lied to Congress about Iran

Binance told the Senate its transaction volume with four major Iranian exchanges did not exceed $110,000 last year. Reporting from Fortune and the New York Times traced $1.7 billion in flows from Binance-linked accounts to Iran-linked entities.

Senator Richard Blumenthal now is concerned that the exchange might have misled Congress about that.

In a follow-up letter to Binance co-chief executive (CEO) Richard Teng, Blumenthal expressed his concern that the exchange might have provided “misrepresentations or misleading information to the Subcommittee and to the public.”

Read more: Binance probed by DOJ files lawsuit against WSJ

Advertisement

The senator, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, demands Binance produce documents justifying its prior March 6th response and its $110,000 claim.

The escalation follows weeks of reporting by Fortune’s Leo Schwartz and Ben Weiss, as well as the New York Times. Their investigations traced hundreds of millions in tether (USDT) from Binance accounts to wallets tied to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Houthis of Yemen. 

Separately, Blumenthal’s original February 24 letter also inquired about payments to crew members of Russia’s sanctions-evading oil fleet.

The $110,000 claim versus $1.7 billion in flows

Binance dismissed the allegations on March 6 as “demonstrably false, unsupported by credible evidence, and defamatory in several material respects.” 

Advertisement

The exchange said its direct transactions with four Iranian exchanges had fallen to no more than $110,000 across the year. Binance highlighted its proactive work against two intermediaries, Hexa Whale and Blessed Trust, to limit “indirect exposure to wallet addresses with potential ties to Iran.”

Blumenthal’s new letter questions that corporate framing.

He asks about Fortune’s reporting of a VIP account registered to a 79-year-old Chinese resident moving $439 million in USDT from Binance to an outside wallet. That wallet forwarded most of those funds to Entity A, an intermediary cluster that Fortune identified as Iran-linked. Entity A allegedly has a financial connection with Nobitex, for example, Iran’s largest crypto exchange, as well as IRGC and Houthi wallets.

A second Chinese VIP, an ostensibly 38-year-old woman, allegedly moved nearly $200 million through the same pipeline. Reporters also flagged the possibility that both accounts could have been accessed from the same device.

Advertisement

Worse, Blumenthal’s letter notes that the New York Times reported that Binance labeled some of these accounts with manual instructions, “Don’t block. Internal accounts.” 

One Iranian national who sent crypto fees directly to Entity A had appeared in a United Nations Security Council report on smuggling for Iran and North Korea.

Senator gives Binance two weeks to respond

Blumenthal’s letter lays out a timeline of allegations. Binance, the senator says, took two months to respond to law enforcement on Hexa Whale, then took another two months to remove the entity. Blessed Trust, even worse, allegedly lasted at least five months as a Binance vendor despite warnings about its alleged terrorist financing.

The senator now demands exact dates. When did these entities open Binance accounts, start transfers, receive flags from Binance staff, and become subjects of suspicious activity reports to US law enforcement? The senator also asks whether Binance has “removed, weakened, or relaxed any compliance policies” since January 2025.

Advertisement

The letter marks the third major escalation about Binance this year. Blumenthal’s February 24 inquiry called Binance a “repeat offender.” Previously, 11 Senate Democrats urged the Treasury and DOJ to investigate. The Wall Street Journal reported that the DOJ opened a probe into Iran’s use of Binance to evade sanctions.

Binance, meanwhile, has sued the Wall Street Journal for defamation.

The political backdrop makes the compliance issues conspicuous. 

President Trump pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) in October 2025 after his guilty plea to Bank Secrecy Act violations. The SEC also voluntarily dismissed its Binance lawsuit in 2025.

Advertisement

Binance then became what Blumenthal called a “vital engine” for World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto venture. Blumenthal’s February letter noted that the vast majority of WLFI’s USD1 stablecoin sat within Binance accounts. 

Abu Dhabi’s MGX settled a $2 billion Binance investment through that USD1 stablecoin.

The price of BNB, the token that Binance issued, is down 31% year to date. Binance equity is not publicly traded.

Blumenthal gave Binance CEO Teng until April 14 to respond.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

FSS orders Dunamu to correct disclosure on Naver Financial deal

Published

on

South Korea’s FSS to probe whale manipulation and spoofing in crypto markets

South Korea’s FSS orders Dunamu to correct omissions in its Naver Financial stock swap filing as new digital asset rules threaten the merger’s structure and timeline.

Summary

  • South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service ordered Dunamu to correct “significant omissions” in filings on its stock swap with Naver Financial.
  • The deal would make Upbit operator Dunamu a wholly owned Naver Financial subsidiary but now faces regulatory, competition, and legislative uncertainty.
  • Ongoing debate around South Korea’s Digital Asset Basic Act threatens to reshape exchange ownership rules and the merger’s underlying logic.

South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has issued a corrective order to Dunamu, the operator of leading crypto exchange Upbit, over “significant omissions or false statements” in a disclosure about its planned comprehensive stock swap with Naver Financial, according to local outlet Money Today as cited by Coinness. The FSS said problems were concentrated in sections on “future corporate restructuring plans” and “other important matters related to investment decisions,” effectively accusing Dunamu of under‑disclosing key risks to shareholders as it moves toward becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Naver Financial.

Under the deal structure first approved in November 2024, Naver Financial aims to acquire 100% of Dunamu through a share exchange that would convert existing Dunamu investors into Naver Financial shareholders and fold the Upbit operator under Naver’s fintech umbrella. According to a correction report filed by Naver Financial, external valuers set the corporate value ratio between the two at 1 to 3.064569, with earlier crypto.news coverage putting Dunamu’s implied valuation in the $10 billion range and the broader merger around $14.5 billion. As previously reported in a crypto.news story, the tie‑up is pitched as a super‑app play that marries Naver Pay’s payments rail with Upbit’s trading engine, giving the combined group control over more than 70% of South Korea’s crypto volumes.

Advertisement

Naver Financial has already pushed back the timetable for the stock swap by roughly three months, with a shareholder vote now slated for August 18 and closing expected on September 30, according to a recent regulatory filing highlighted by crypto.news. Naver said it adjusted the schedule to reflect “approval procedures and improvement of laws,” as antitrust reviews at the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), major shareholder change declarations and evolving digital asset rules all converge on the transaction.finance.

Industry commentary in Chosun Ilbo warned that proposed limits on major shareholders in virtual asset exchanges—floated in connection with South Korea’s Digital Asset Basic Act—could make Naver’s 100% control of Dunamu “unfeasible” if thresholds are set as low as 15–20%. Dunamu CEO Oh Kyoung‑suk told shareholders that if caps are fixed at “20% for individuals and 34% for corporations, it will affect both Naver Financial’s 100% control structure and major shareholders,” but added that the company would “proceed as originally planned regardless.”

The corrective order lands amid a broader regulatory reset as Seoul finalizes its Digital Asset Basic Act, a framework meant to anchor South Korea’s crypto rules from 2026. As detailed in a separate crypto.news story, the draft introduces no‑fault liability for digital asset operators, forces stablecoin issuers to hold more than 100% reserves at segregated institutions, and hands new enforcement and oversight powers to agencies including the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea.

Advertisement

For Dunamu and Naver, that means the economics and governance of the merger sit in the crosshairs of rules still being negotiated, with ownership caps, reserve mandates, and stricter disclosure standards all capable of derailing or re‑pricing the deal. In that sense, the FSS’s move to force a more detailed explanation of “future corporate restructuring plans” reads less as a technical compliance issue and more as a stress test of how Korea’s new digital‑asset order will treat a dominant domestic exchange trying to plug itself directly into a tech‑payments giant.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Circle Unveils New Token Aimed at Expanding Bitcoin Utility

Published

on

Circle Unveils New Token Aimed at Expanding Bitcoin Utility

Circle has launched cirBTC, a wrapped Bitcoin token backed 1:1 with native on-chain BTC reserves, deploying first on Ethereum mainnet and its own Arc blockchain.

The move is direct: Bitcoin holds over $1.7 trillion in market cap but generates almost no DeFi activity, and Circle is positioning itself as the infrastructure layer that changes that.

The institutional implication is immediate. With Bitcoin ETFs reversing months of outflows and fresh capital flowing into BTC exposure, the demand for yield-bearing Bitcoin products is structurally rising – and Circle is moving to own that pipeline before a competitor does.

Key Takeaways:
Advertisement
  • Circle has unveiled cirBTC, a wrapped Bitcoin token backed 1:1 with native on-chain Bitcoin reserves.
  • The token launches initially on Ethereum mainnet and Circle’s Arc blockchain, with real-time reserve verification and no third-party custodians.
  • cirBTC targets an estimated $1.7 trillion Bitcoin liquidity gap, integrating with USDC, Circle Mint, and major DeFi lending and derivatives protocols.
  • This is Circle’s first major non-stablecoin product since its NYSE listing as CRCL in 2025, signaling a deliberate expansion beyond fiat-pegged assets.

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio during market turbulence

cirBTC: What It Actually Changes for Bitcoin Liquidity

The existing wrapped Bitcoin market is not small, WBTC launched in January 2019 and at its peak represented billions in DeFi TVL, but it has been defined by custodian opacity.

The 2022 FTX collapse accelerated distrust in centralized wrappers, and renBTC, which once held over $1 billion in TVL, faded as audit credibility eroded. Circle is betting that its track record with USDC, now above $30 billion in circulation, gives it the institutional credibility those products never had.

Rachel Mayer, VP of product at Circle and the Arc blockchain, put the thesis plainly in a post on X: “Bitcoin is sitting on the sidelines of DeFi. Not because people don’t want yield or liquidity – it’s because they don’t trust the wrapper.”

Advertisement

She followed directly: “cirBTC is Circle’s answer: 1:1 backed, on-chain-verifiable, and built on infrastructure the market already trusts.”

That distinction matters. WBTC routes through BitGo as custodian – a model that requires trusting an intermediary’s audit. cirBTC uses real-time onchain reserve verification with no third-party custodian sitting between holder and backing BTC.

For institutional desks and DeFi protocols that learned hard lessons from opaque collateral structures, verifiability isn’t a feature – it’s the threshold requirement. If Circle can demonstrate reserve proof holds under stress, the institutional case becomes difficult to argue against.

Advertisement

The mechanism integrates directly with Circle Mint for OTC desks and connects ready-made to USDC liquidity pools, creating a cross-collateral environment that no prior wrapped BTC product has had at launch.

The caveat: Circle’s infrastructure is centralized by nature, and IMF warnings around cross-chain tokenization risks apply here as they do across the RWA sector. The bear case accelerates if a bridge exploit or smart contract failure forces Circle to respond – and the firm’s 2023 inaction during $230 million in USDC bridge thefts on Multichain remains an open scar on its credibility.

What to Watch as Circle Bitcoin Moves Toward Full Rollout

Full rollout is targeted for Q2 2026, with DeFi protocol integrations and Circle Mint connectivity expected by May.

Advertisement

Expansions to Solana and additional L2s are on the roadmap but unconfirmed. The immediate variable to watch is DeFi TVL migration – specifically whether lending protocols route BTC collateral toward cirBTC or remain with WBTC given its deeper existing liquidity moats.

Regulatory backdrop matters here too. The 2025 U.S. stablecoin legislation created a clearer framework for fiat-pegged digital assets, but tokenized BTC products sit in a grayer zone.

Broader institutional regulatory clarity from the SEC and CFTC on tokenized assets could accelerate or stall adoption depending on how cirBTC is classified. Circle’s NYSE listing as CRCL adds public accountability that custodian-model competitors do not carry – a pressure point that cuts both ways.

Advertisement

If cirBTC captures even a fractional share of BTC held in ETF structures and redirects it toward DeFi yield, the liquidity impact on Ethereum and Arc protocols would be structural, not marginal. If adoption stalls at the institutional access layer due to regulatory friction or a trust event, it validates every skeptic who argued Circle’s credibility is stablecoin-specific and doesn’t transfer to Bitcoin infrastructure.

Explore: The best pre-launch token sales with asymmetric upside potential

The post Circle Unveils New Token Aimed at Expanding Bitcoin Utility appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Dmail Network To Shut Down Decentralized Email Service

Published

on

Dmail Network To Shut Down Decentralized Email Service

Decentralized email platform Dmail Network is shutting down after five years of operations, citing high infrastructure costs, weak monetization, failed funding efforts and limited token utility.

The platform said it will gradually cease all services starting May 15, and urged users to export their data before then. It said all nodes will shut down after that date, making emails and accounts inaccessible.

Dmail Network positioned itself as a Web3 communication platform focused on decentralized, wallet-based email, encrypted messaging and onchain notifications. In January 2025, DappRadar ranked Dmail second among AI DApps, with 4.9 million unique active wallets for the month.

Dmail’s closure suggests that user activity alone was not enough to sustain an infrastructure-heavy Web3 product once high operating costs, weak monetization and failed fundraising converged.

Advertisement
Source: Dmail Network

Dmail points to costs, failed fundraising and weak token use

Dmail said the economics of running a decentralized communication platform had become increasingly difficult to sustain. In its shutdown note, the company said bandwidth, storage and computing costs consumed a large share of its budget, with the expenses rising as users grew. 

The company said it explored different paid models and monetization paths but failed to find a business model users were willing to support at scale. 

Related: Big Tech firms back new x402 Foundation to advance agentic AI adoption

Dmail said that worsening market conditions added to the pressure. The team said multiple financing rounds failed, acquisition efforts fell through and funding was nearing exhaustion. It said departures among core staff left the team unable to keep maintaining its infrastructure. 

It added that the project’s token never developed a clear, large-scale use case and that its economic design failed to create a self-sustaining loop. Following the announcement, Dmail Network’s token dropped to an all-time low of $0.0002067, according to CoinGecko. 

Advertisement

Dmail joins growing list of Web3 closures

Dmail’s shutdown comes amid a recent wave of closures across Web3, as projects struggle with weak demand and funding pressures. 

On March 18, DAO tooling platform Tally said it was winding down after concluding that there was no viable market for its products. On March 24, development company Balancer Labs said it was shutting down four months after an exploit that drained over $100 million. 

Magazine: AI agents will kill the web as we know it: Animoca’s Yat Siu

Advertisement