Connect with us

Crypto World

Silver Hits $120: Why the Metal Is Exploding Like Never Seen Before in History

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • Silver surged 450% to $120 adding $6 trillion in market cap amid five-year supply deficit of 678 million ounces. 
  • China export restrictions tightened global supply with Shanghai silver at $127 creating record premiums over markets. 
  • Paper-to-physical leverage at 350:1 triggered forced buying as delivery requests exposed severe physical shortages. 
  • Lease rates spiked to 39% while backwardation emerged signaling worst physical stress since 1980 silver crisis.

 

Silver prices have exploded to $120 per ounce, representing a 450% surge over two years. This historic rally added over $6 trillion to silver’s total market capitalization.

The metal now stands as the world’s best-performing asset across all categories. Multiple structural factors converged simultaneously to create this unprecedented price movement. Supply deficits, export restrictions, and paper market failures combined to fuel the explosion.

Unprecedented Supply Crisis Drives Historic Price Action

The current silver explosion stems from years of accumulated deficits rather than temporary imbalances. Bull Theory explained that global consumption exceeded production for five consecutive years before prices began accelerating.

According to the analysis, total shortages reached 678 million ounces during this period. This deficit represents almost one complete year of worldwide mine output missing from available supply.

Advertisement

China’s export restrictions intensified the supply crisis to historic levels. The country controls major portions of global refined silver through processing operations.

Advertisement

New licensing requirements drastically reduced the amount of metal permitted to leave Chinese borders. Physical silver inside China became increasingly scarce as Shanghai prices climbed to $127. Bull Theory noted that this premium over international markets demonstrates the severity of internal shortages.

Industrial demand growth reached levels never previously witnessed in silver markets. Solar panel manufacturing now consumes massive quantities for electrical conductivity requirements.

The report indicates annual solar demand expanding from 200 million ounces to 450 million ounces by 2030. Data center construction, artificial intelligence infrastructure, and grid electrification created additional pressure. These sectors cannot easily substitute silver due to its superior conductive properties.

The paper market’s leverage ratio exposed systemic vulnerabilities at unprecedented scales. Current estimates place paper-to-physical ratios at 350:1 across trading platforms.

Advertisement

Bull Theory highlighted that for every single physical ounce, there are 350 ounces in paper claims. Increased physical delivery demands triggered forced buying as shorts scrambled for metal. This created a self-reinforcing loop pushing prices higher at accelerating rates.

Market Dislocation Reaches Historic Extremes

Lease rates spiked to 39% annualized, indicating the most severe borrowing stress in decades. Normal market conditions maintain rates near zero for precious metals lending.

The explosion to 39% revealed extreme difficulty accessing physical inventory for delivery obligations. Borrowing costs at these levels appeared only during previous historic crises.

Backwardation emerged across silver futures as spot prices exceeded forward contracts. This inversion signals desperate demand for immediate physical delivery over future promises.

Advertisement

Bull Theory observed that market participants last witnessed similar backwardation patterns around 1980 during that era’s silver crisis. The reappearance confirmed structural breakdown in normal supply relationships.

Refining capacity losses compounded the supply explosion by removing 9.7% of global processing ability. Even available raw silver could not transform into deliverable bars quickly enough.

Exchange-traded funds simultaneously absorbed 95 million ounces in early 2025 alone. This removal from circulation eliminated metal that industries and contract holders desperately needed.

Strategic classification by the United States formalized silver’s critical status in August 2025. Government recognition of supply vulnerabilities marked a historic shift from commodity to strategic resource.

Advertisement

Combined with multi-year deficits, Chinese export controls, industrial demand surges, paper leverage collapse, extreme lease rates, backwardation, refinery shutdowns, and ETF absorption, physical scarcity replaced paper pricing.

Bull Theory concluded that the explosion occurred because every major factor aligned simultaneously for the first time in history.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Spot Bitcoin ETF AUM Hits Lowest Level Since April 2025

Published

on

Spot Bitcoin ETF AUM Hits Lowest Level Since April 2025

Assets in spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs slipped below $100 billion on Tuesday following a fresh $272 million in outflows.

According to data from SoSoValue, the move marked the first time spot Bitcoin ETF assets under management have fallen below that level since April 2025, after peaking at about $168 billion in October

The drop came amid a broader crypto market sell-off, with Bitcoin sliding below $74,000 on Tuesday. The global cryptocurrency market capitalization fell from $3.11 trillion to $2.64 trillion over the past week, according to CoinGecko.

Altcoin funds secure modest inflows

The latest outflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs followed a brief rebound in flows on Monday, when the products attracted $562 million in net inflows.

Advertisement

Still, Bitcoin funds resumed losses on Tuesday, pushing year-to-date outflows to almost $1.3 billion, coming in line with ongoing market volatility.

Spot Bitcoin ETF flows since Jan. 26, 2026. Source: SoSoValue

By contrast, ETFs tracking altcoins such as Ether (ETH), XRP (XRP) and Solana (SOL) recorded modest inflows of $14 million, $19.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

Is institutional adoption moving beyond ETFs?

The ongoing sell-off in Bitcoin ETFs comes as BTC trades below the ETF creation cost basis of $84,000, suggesting new ETF shares are being issued at a loss and placing pressure on fund flows.

Market observers say that the slump is unlikely to trigger further mass sell-offs in ETFs.

“My guess is vast majority of assets in spot BTC ETFs stay put regardless,” ETF analyst Nate Geraci wrote on X on Monday.

Advertisement
Source: Nate Geraci

Thomas Restout, CEO of institutional liquidity provider B2C2, echoed the sentiment, noting that institutional ETF investors are generally resilient. Still, he hinted that a shift toward onchain trading may be underway.

Related: VistaShares launches Treasury ETF with options-based Bitcoin exposure

“The benefit of institutions coming in and buying ETFs is they’re far more resilient. They will sit on their views and positions for longer,” Restout said in a Rulematch Spot On podcast on Monday.

“I think the next level of transformation is institutions actually trading crypto, rather than just using securitized ETFs. We’re expecting the next wave of institutions to be the ones trading the underlying assets directly,” he noted.