Crypto World
the chart vs the story
Every bullish signal is in place. Exchange supply is draining, whales are accumulating, ETF money is trickling in, and a landmark law sits on the Senate floor. And still XRP keeps losing support and failing at the same ceiling. Here is why the chart is winning the argument.
Summary
- XRP lost $1.15 on heavy volume and failed to reclaim it into the close.
- The $1.25 descending trendline remains the level that keeps rejecting rallies.
- Bullish fundamentals are real, but the market is not rewarding them yet.
- A decisive trendline break is needed before the chart confirms the story.
XRP broke below $1.15 on June 19, 2026, falling more than 3% on a volume spike roughly 170% above average, and the break mattered more than the size of the drop. That $1.15 level had been support, the floor buyers defended after a recent push above $1.20, and losing it on heavy volume turned a level that had held the price up into a level that now caps it.
It was the latest in a pattern that has defined XRP for months: every attempt to rally runs into a descending trendline near $1.25 and fails, every recovery stalls, and support levels give way one after another even as the fundamental case for XRP grows stronger.
Exchange supply is draining to multi-year lows, large holders are accumulating aggressively, exchange-traded fund money is flowing in, and the most important crypto legislation in American history sits on the Senate floor. And still the price cannot hold.
The chart is winning the argument against the story, and understanding why is the key to understanding XRP right now.
This piece works through that contradiction. It covers exactly what happened at the $1.15 break and the technical structure XRP is trapped in, the bullish fundamental case that keeps failing to move the price, why a market late in a downtrend stops responding to good news, the specific levels that now define the battle, and how to read a situation where strong fundamentals and weak price action point in opposite directions.
The goal is not to predict where XRP goes next but to explain why it behaves the way it does. The gap between XRP’s improving fundamentals and its deteriorating chart is one of the most instructive setups in crypto, and it teaches something important about how markets actually work when sentiment turns.
The break, and the structure XRP is trapped in
To understand why XRP cannot hold its levels, you have to see the technical structure it has been caught in, because that structure explains the repeated failures better than any single piece of news.
The June 19 break was specific and revealing. XRP fell about 3.4%, dropping from roughly $1.19 to around $1.14, with the sharpest selling arriving in a single burst when volume surged to roughly 170% above average and pushed the price decisively through the $1.15 support.
Buyers stepped in near $1.13 and managed to lift the price back toward $1.15 into the close, but the rebound failed to reclaim the broken level. That is the technically important detail: a support level that breaks and then rejects the price on the way back up has flipped into resistance, becoming a ceiling, not a floor.
This is the same pattern that has repeated at higher levels, where $1.25 was lost earlier and turned into the overhead resistance that has capped every rally since, and now $1.15 risks doing the same thing at a lower level. Each broken support becomes the next ceiling, and the price grinds lower through a staircase of failed floors.
The larger structure containing all of this is a year-long symmetrical triangle, a charting pattern in which the price oscillates within a narrowing range bounded by a descending line of lower highs above and a flatter line of support below. For XRP, the price action has compressed between support near $1.10 and resistance around $1.25, with a descending trendline near $1.25 that has rejected every recovery attempt for months, forming the series of lower highs that defines the downtrend.
This is the cage XRP is trapped in: it cannot break above the descending trendline near $1.25, so every rally fails there, and it keeps losing the support levels beneath it, so the floor keeps dropping.
The most important level on the entire chart is that descending trendline near $1.25, because XRP has failed below it repeatedly, and until the price decisively breaks above it, traders treat every rally as a test of resistance to be sold, not the start of a new uptrend. The structure, not any single news event, is what keeps defeating the price.
The bullish case that keeps failing
Here is what makes XRP’s chart so striking: the fundamental case for the asset has been getting stronger, not weaker, even as the price falls, and laying out that case sharpens the puzzle.
The on-chain and structural signals are clearly bullish. XRP held on exchanges has fallen to multi-year lows as coins move off trading venues into private wallets, which reduces the supply readily available to sell, a setup that is supposed to support prices.
That is the supply story behind the chart. Large holders have been accumulating aggressively, with wallets holding a million or more XRP controlling a record share of the circulating supply and adding well over a billion XRP over six months, the kind of conviction buying that bulls read as a positive sign.
Exchange-traded fund money has been flowing into XRP products, with XRP drawing inflows that outpaced other major altcoins on some days, signaling real institutional interest. That is the demand case for XRP, where ETF flows matter only if they become large enough to break the supply wall.
And underneath all of it sits the largest catalyst of all: the CLARITY Act, the crypto market-structure bill that would codify XRP’s status as a digital commodity into federal law, sitting on the Senate floor and representing a potential demand shock if it passes. That is the catalyst that could break the trendline.
By almost every fundamental measure, the case for XRP has been improving.
And yet the price keeps falling, which is the heart of the contradiction. XRP is down sharply over the past month even as exchange balances shrink, whales accumulate, ETF money arrives, and a transformative law advances.
The bullish signals are real, but they have not translated into price strength, and recovery attempts built on them keep failing at the same resistance.
This is the puzzle that frustrates XRP holders: every reason to be bullish is in place, the supply is tightening, the big holders are buying, the institutions are interested, the law is advancing, and none of it has stopped the price from grinding lower and losing support after support.
The fundamental case and the price action have completely diverged, with the story pointing up and the chart pointing down. That divergence is not a temporary anomaly to be dismissed.
It is itself a signal, and understanding what it means is the most important thing about XRP’s current situation.
Why a market late in a downtrend ignores good news
The explanation for the contradiction lies in market psychology, specifically in how markets behave late in a downtrend, and it is one of the most useful lessons a trader can internalize.
When an asset is no longer reacting positively to bullish news, that is often a characteristic sign of a late-stage downtrend, and it is exactly what XRP has been doing. In a healthy uptrend or a neutral market, good news lifts the price, because buyers are willing to act on it.
But when sentiment has turned negative and a downtrend is entrenched, the market stops responding to good news, because the marginal participant is a seller, not a buyer. Every rally attracts holders looking to exit at a better price, every piece of bullish news is met with selling into the strength, and the accumulated negative sentiment overwhelms the positive fundamentals.
XRP has been repeatedly failing to react positively to bullish supply data, which is precisely the behavior of a market where technical selling is overwhelming longer-term accumulation, and where traders have shifted to focusing on price action and levels instead of on fundamentals and narrative.
This is why XRP’s strong fundamentals have not saved its price: in the current sentiment regime, the fundamentals are simply not what the marginal trader is acting on. The supply tightening and whale accumulation are real, but they describe longer-term, patient positioning.
The day-to-day price is set by shorter-term traders who are selling rallies and respecting the downtrend, and right now the shorter-term selling is winning. The descending trendline near $1.25 has become a self-reinforcing level.
Because it has rejected every rally, traders expect it to reject the next one, so they sell into approaches to it, which makes the rejection happen, which reinforces the expectation. The market has, in effect, decided to trade XRP technically rather than fundamentally, and until that changes, the good news keeps arriving and the price keeps ignoring it.
This is not irrational; it is how markets behave when sentiment is negative and a technical structure has taken hold. It explains why “every bullish signal is in place and the price still falls” is not a contradiction but a recognizable late-downtrend pattern.
The levels that define the battle
With the structure and the psychology understood, the situation reduces to a small number of specific price levels, and watching them is how to read what happens next.
The single most important level is the descending trendline near $1.25, which has capped every rally for months and which defines the entire downtrend. A decisive break above $1.25, on strong volume, would change the conversation entirely, because it would mean XRP had finally broken the descending structure that has contained it.
That would flip the technical picture from “sell every rally” to “a new uptrend may be starting.” Until that happens, $1.25 is the ceiling, and traders will treat approaches to it as opportunities to sell, not as breakouts to chase.
Just below the current price, the recently broken $1.15 level now acts as resistance, the first hurdle bulls must reclaim, and beneath that, support is clustered between roughly $1.13 and $1.10, the zone buyers are trying to defend. The broader triangle is bounded by support near $1.10 and resistance near $1.25, so the price is compressed within that range, and a decisive break of either boundary would signal the next significant move.
The asymmetry in these levels is what defines the current battle. On the downside, if XRP loses the $1.13 to $1.10 support zone, the next levels of support sit lower, and a breakdown through the bottom of the year-long triangle would open the door to a deeper decline, accelerating the downtrend.
On the upside, the path is harder, because XRP must first reclaim the broken $1.15 level, then push through the resistance up to $1.25, and then decisively break the descending trendline that has rejected it repeatedly. That is a series of hurdles, not a single one.
This is why the near-term bias in the price action has been bearish even with bullish fundamentals: the downside requires only losing a nearby support, while the upside requires clearing a stack of resistances culminating in a trendline break. The levels to watch are therefore clear: $1.10 to $1.13 as the support that must hold, $1.15 as the first ceiling to reclaim, and $1.25 as the decisive level whose break would change everything.
Everything in between is the compression of a triangle reaching its resolution. For readers newer to technical setups, reading support and resistance is essential because these levels define where buyers and sellers repeatedly reveal themselves.
How to read fundamentals against price
The deeper lesson of XRP’s situation is about how to think when strong fundamentals and weak price action point in opposite directions, because this is a common and confusing situation that this case illustrates clearly.
The temptation for a fundamentals-focused observer is to conclude that the market is simply wrong, that the bullish supply data and the advancing law mean XRP must rise, and that the falling price is an irrational mistake to be ignored or bought. This is dangerous, because it dismisses the most direct evidence available, the price itself, which aggregates the actual decisions of all market participants.
When fundamentals and price diverge for an extended period, the price is telling you that something the fundamentals miss is dominating. In XRP’s case, that is the negative sentiment and technical selling that overwhelm the positive supply story.
Respecting that signal is wiser than insisting the market should agree with your fundamental analysis. The price action is not noise obscuring the fundamentals; it is information about how the market is actually weighing everything, including factors the bullish narrative leaves out, like the broad crypto downtrend and the macro headwind on XRP.
The wiser reading holds both the fundamentals and the price action as real and lets the price action govern the near-term while the fundamentals inform the longer-term possibility. XRP’s improving fundamentals truly could matter eventually, especially if the CLARITY catalyst lands and shifts sentiment, at which point the tightened supply could amplify an upside move, exactly the setup the bulls describe.
But until sentiment turns and the price confirms it by breaking the descending trendline, the fundamentals remain potential energy that the market is not yet acting on, and trading as though the bullish case is already winning ignores what the chart is plainly saying.
The synthesis is that XRP is a fundamentally improving asset trapped in a technically bearish structure, and the resolution depends on a catalyst strong enough to flip sentiment and break the trendline, most plausibly the CLARITY vote. Watching the price for that break, instead of assuming the fundamentals will force it, is the disciplined way to read the situation.
The fundamentals load the spring; the price tells you whether it has been released. None of this is investment advice; it is a frame for thinking clearly when the story and the chart disagree.
When the chart wins the argument
XRP cannot hold $1.15 for the same reason it could not hold $1.25 before it: the asset is trapped in a year-long descending structure, a symmetrical triangle bounded by resistance near $1.25 and support near $1.10, where a trendline of lower highs rejects every rally and each broken support becomes the next ceiling.
The June 19 break below $1.15 on heavy volume, with the failed attempt to reclaim it, was the latest turn of a pattern that has defined XRP for months. The price is grinding lower through a staircase of failed floors while every recovery stalls at resistance.
What makes the situation so instructive is that it happens against a genuinely bullish fundamental backdrop. Exchange supply is draining to multi-year lows, whales are accumulating a record share of the supply, ETF money is flowing in, and the CLARITY Act sits on the Senate floor as a potential demand shock.
By almost every fundamental measure, the case for XRP is strengthening, and yet the price keeps falling, because the asset is late in a downtrend where the market has stopped responding to good news. The marginal trader is a seller, and accumulated negative sentiment overwhelms the positive fundamentals.
This is not a contradiction but a recognizable pattern: when sentiment turns negative and a technical structure takes hold, fundamentals become potential energy the market is not yet acting on, and the chart wins the argument.
The resolution waits on a catalyst strong enough to flip sentiment and break the descending trendline near $1.25, most plausibly the CLARITY vote, and until that break comes, the disciplined reading is to respect what the price is saying.
The fundamentals have loaded the spring; the chart is still holding it down.
Frequently asked questions
Why did XRP break below $1.15?
On June 19, 2026, XRP fell about 3.4% from roughly $1.19 to around $1.15, with the sharpest selling arriving on a volume spike about 170% above average that pushed the price decisively through $1.15 support. Buyers stepped in near $1.13 but failed to reclaim the broken $1.15 level into the close. The break mattered because a support level that breaks and then rejects the price flips into resistance, becoming a new ceiling, continuing a months-long pattern of failed support levels.
What is the symmetrical triangle XRP is trapped in?
It is a year-long charting pattern in which XRP’s price has compressed between support near $1.10 and resistance near $1.25, bounded above by a descending trendline of lower highs. That trendline near $1.25 has rejected every rally attempt for months, defining the downtrend, while the price keeps losing support levels beneath it. The structure is the cage XRP is caught in: it cannot break above $1.25, and it keeps dropping through the floors below, grinding lower until the triangle resolves.
Why is XRP falling if the fundamentals are bullish?
Because XRP is late in a downtrend, where markets stop responding to good news. Exchange supply is draining, whales are accumulating, ETF money is flowing in, and the CLARITY Act is advancing, all bullish. But in a negative-sentiment downtrend, the marginal trader is a seller: rallies attract holders looking to exit, bullish news is sold into, and technical selling overwhelms longer-term accumulation. When an asset stops reacting positively to good news, it is a characteristic sign of a late-stage downtrend, which is exactly XRP’s behavior.
What levels matter most for XRP now?
The single most important level is the descending trendline near $1.25, which has capped every rally for months; a decisive break above it would change the technical picture entirely. The recently broken $1.15 is now the first resistance bulls must reclaim. Support is clustered between $1.13 and $1.10, the zone that must hold to prevent a deeper decline. The broader triangle runs between $1.10 support and $1.25 resistance, and a decisive break of either boundary signals the next major move.
What would it take for XRP to turn bullish?
A decisive break above the descending trendline near $1.25 on strong volume, which would flip the technical structure from “sell every rally” to a potential new uptrend. That most plausibly requires a catalyst strong enough to flip sentiment, most likely passage of the CLARITY Act, which would codify XRP’s commodity status and could trigger a demand shock that the tightened supply would amplify. Until the price confirms by breaking the trendline, the bullish fundamentals remain potential energy the market is not yet acting on.
Should I trust the fundamentals or the price?
When fundamentals and price diverge for an extended period, the price is telling you something the fundamentals miss is dominating, in XRP’s case negative sentiment and technical selling. Dismissing the falling price as an irrational mistake is dangerous, because the price aggregates all participants’ actual decisions. The wiser approach holds both as real: the fundamentals could matter eventually, especially if CLARITY lands, but until sentiment turns and the price confirms by breaking resistance, the near-term is governed by the chart. This is not investment advice.
As of June 21, 2026. Prices are volatile and move quickly; verify current levels before relying on this analysis. This article is information, not investment or trading advice.
Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) has approved the first admission of tokenized digital securities to its Official List, alongside permission for the instruments to trade on a recognized exchange venue. The development signals that tokenized assets can be structured and regulated within an established securities framework, rather than operating only as over-the-counter products or experimental pilots.
The legal filing and regulatory steps were guided by law firm Gibson Dunn, which advised Btech Holdings Limited. According to the firm, the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of ADGM approved the relevant prospectuses on 11 June 2026 under the market and financial services rules that apply to securities listings.
What ADGM approved, and why it matters
ADGM’s announcement centers on the admission of tokenized securities referred to as bStocks. The instruments were characterized under ADGM regulation as securities for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Regulations 2015 (FSMR). They were structured as Certificates over Shares, a design choice intended to fit the tokenized product into conventional securities categories.
After FSRA approval of the prospectuses, the securities were admitted to ADGM’s Official List of Securities with effect from the same date, and they were also set to be traded on the Recognized Investment Exchange (RIE) operated by Nest Exchange Limited.
In institutional capital markets, listing and trading rules are critical for liquidity, investor protections, and market integrity. By tying tokenized securities to an official listing process and prospectus approval, ADGM is effectively aligning part of the tokenization market with the same regulatory benchmarks used for traditional listings.
Regulatory pathway: prospectus approval and admission to the Official List
Per Gibson Dunn’s account, FSRA approval was granted for prospectuses drafted by the firm. The approval was described as being provided pursuant to section 61 of FSMR and Rule 4.6 of the Market Rules (MKT), including a reference to meeting requirements under MKT 4.5.
This matters because prospectus regimes are typically designed to ensure disclosures are comprehensive and consistent, covering issuer details, the nature of the instrument, risk factors, and other information required for public market participation. For tokenization to move into mainstream financing channels, regulators and exchanges generally need to ensure tokenized structures still satisfy disclosure and governance expectations.
How the product is structured: certificates over shares
The tokenized instruments were described as securities that fall under FSMR, structured as certificates over shares. The certificate-over-share structure is relevant in regulatory terms because it can help define the rights embedded in the tokenized instrument, including the economic linkage to the underlying shares.
While tokenization often involves distributed ledger infrastructure, the key regulatory question is how the product maps to existing legal definitions. ADGM’s approach, as reflected in this admission, indicates a willingness to treat tokenized securities as regulated securities when the instrument’s legal characteristics are clear and the issuer complies with disclosure and admission requirements.
Implications for tokenization in the UAE and beyond
Institutional tokenization is still searching for scalable market infrastructure and consistent regulatory standards. Regions that can demonstrate repeatable pathways for approvals, listing, and regulated trading have an advantage when issuers and financial intermediaries decide where to deploy tokenized capital markets activity.
ADGM’s step also points to a broader industry trend: regulators are increasingly focused on whether tokenized assets can meet established securities principles, including transparency, market conduct expectations, and investor protections.
In this case, the admission to ADGM’s Official List and the ability to trade on the RIE operated by Nest Exchange potentially reduce operational uncertainty for market participants evaluating tokenized instruments. It may also encourage other issuers considering tokenization to pursue structured, regulated listings rather than limiting activity to private placements.
Role of legal counsel
Gibson Dunn stated it advised on multiple phases of the mandate, including structuring the issuance, preparing prospectuses approved by FSRA, and handling the applications for admission to the Official List and to trading on the RIE.
The firm said the team was led by partners Sameera Kimatrai and Jade Chu, supported by associates Aliya Padhani and Holly Alderton. The matter was also described as involving other partners including Hagen Rooke, Mellissa Duru, and Lauren Cook Jackson.
What to watch next
This admission provides a regulatory reference point for tokenized securities that aim to be integrated into exchange-based trading. Going forward, market observers will likely focus on whether additional tokenized issuances follow the same pathway, how liquidity develops on the trading venue, and whether the market structure attracts issuers and intermediaries at scale.
For investors, the practical value of tokenized securities will depend on execution quality, transparency, custody and settlement mechanics, and ongoing compliance. For issuers, the central question will be whether regulated listing and trading can reduce barriers to issuance while still supporting innovation in how assets are tokenized and distributed.
Crypto World
Could Keir Starmer’s Exit Open the Door to Britain’s Most Crypto-Friendly Labour Leader?
Andy Burnham’s landslide by-election win has handed Labour’s most crypto-friendly figure a clear route to challenge Keir Starmer for the party leadership.
The Greater Manchester mayor will be sworn in as an MP this week, removing the last barrier to a leadership bid. His enthusiasm for Web3 sits awkwardly beside Starmer’s recent crackdown on crypto.
Burnham’s Win Reopens the Leadership Question
Burnham took the Makerfield seat on June 18 with 54.8% of the vote. He beat Reform UK by a majority of more than 9,200, on a turnout that climbed to almost 59%.
By-election turnouts usually fall, so the result reads as a genuine mandate.
He is due to be sworn in within days. On Polymarket, the crypto-settled prediction market, traders have wagered more than $11 million on the succession and make Burnham the clear favorite to take over.
Starmer insists he will fight any challenge.
Weekend reports suggested the prime minister was weighing his future, though his office dismissed talk of an imminent exit.
Cabinet ministers, union leaders and party donors have all joined talks about the timing of a handover.
A Pro-Web3 Voice Against a Crypto Crackdown
Burnham ranks among the few senior Labour figures to openly back digital assets. He told about 100 Web3 founders at a Stand With Crypto event that he was “bought in.”
“Manchester was the home of the Industrial Revolution. Let’s make it the home of the web3 revolution,” Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, in remarks to crypto founders.
That tone clashes with the national party. In March, Starmer’s government imposed a moratorium on crypto donations to political parties.
The independent Rycroft Review had warned that crypto’s anonymity could mask foreign money entering UK politics.
Even so, Burnham’s support looks regional and pragmatic, tied to Manchester jobs rather than markets.
Reform UK is Britain’s most crypto-forward party, and one of only three that had agreed to accept crypto at all.
Its leader, Nigel Farage, has bought Bitcoin (BTC) himself and pitched a national reserve.
Markets Watch the Handover
The political risk has already reached bond markets. The 10-year gilt yield rose to about 4.8% on Friday.
Investors are weighing a Burnham government they expect to borrow and spend more freely, and sterling weakened alongside it.
For crypto, the signal is fainter. Bitcoin traded near $63,900, up less than 1% on the day but down about 17% over the month and 38% on the year.
It sits well below its October record near $126,000, so the turmoil has produced no clear safe-haven bid.
Any read-through also depends on a retail base that is shrinking. Crypto ownership among UK adults has slipped to about 8%, down from 12% a year earlier, the FCA found.
A Burnham premiership could still soften the tone toward Web3 after a year of tighter UK crypto rules, though bond investors look more worried about his spending than his digital-asset views.
His swearing-in and any leadership timetable this week will set the near-term direction. A warmer crypto stance surviving Britain’s fiscal squeeze is the real question for a shrinking crypto electorate.
The post Could Keir Starmer’s Exit Open the Door to Britain’s Most Crypto-Friendly Labour Leader? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
In times when investors are pulling funds out of the spot exchange-traded funds tracking ETH and especially BTC, their behavior toward XRP, HYPE, and SOL has been entirely contrasting.
The ETFs following the three altcoins’ performances continue to see more net inflows even as the market stagnates and uncertainty builds.
XRP, SOL, HYPE ETFs Keep Gaining Capital
CryptoPotato has repeatedly reported on the Ripple ETFs’ impressive performance over the past several weeks, in which most assets, including XRP, recorded fresh losses and dipped to multi-year lows. However, investors using the Wall Street-trading financial vehicles have remained active, with net inflows dominating for months. In fact, there have been only two weeks in the red since mid-March.
The last one, which had only four trading days, also ended in the green. The ETFs attracted $2.82 million on Monday, $5.30 million on Tuesday, and $2.55 million on Thursday. Since Wednesday was a $0.00 day, according to SoSoValue data, that means that the week ended with net inflows of $10.66 million. The cumulative net inflows have tapped a new all-time high of $1.45 billion.
The Solana ETFs also attracted over $7 million in net inflows in the past week, following a red one with $2.58 million in net outflows. HYPE and its ETFs continue to be the current market superstar. The funds saw their third-best week to date, with almost $28 million entering. Moreover, the HYPE ETFs have been on a six-week streak of net inflows since their inception in mid-May.
Their performance has been particularly promising since they have attracted nearly $185 million in net inflows in six weeks. The same six weeks have been highly emotional and full of FUD for the entire crypto market, especially June’s start when most assets tumbled to multi-year lows.
BTC, ETH ETFs Deep in Red
And while the aforementioned altcoins continue to enjoy fresh ETF capital, the same cannot be said for the funds tracking the two largest cryptocurrencies by market cap. As reported earlier, the spot BTC ETFs bled more than $226 million in the past week, and are down by roughly $5 billion in the same six weeks in which the HYPE and XRP ETFs have been only in the green.
The spot Ethereum ETFs are in no better shape. In fact, they are on the same six-week negative streak, pushing the total inflows down by nearly $1 billion. So the question now is whether investors are simply seasonally rotating from larger-cap digital assets into smaller altcoins, or have they completely abandoned BTC and ETH for the new kids on the block.
The post Why Capital Is Flowing Into XRP, SOL, and HYPE Instead of BTC and ETH appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin’s downside risks are again back in focus as analyst Jesse Olson laid out a worst-case technical scenario that could send BTC sharply lower if a broader macro shock hits US markets. In a Sunday post, Olson pointed to a multi-week chart setup that, in his view, leaves Bitcoin vulnerable to a move toward $23,980—a level he frames as a key target in the event of a severe stock-market sell-off.
The bearish case is not only technical. Olson’s outlook aligns with what multiple market indicators have been signaling so far in 2026: institutional participation appears muted, with a persistently weak Coinbase premium reading and ongoing spot Bitcoin ETF outflows described by market data providers. Together, these factors suggest that when risk appetite falls, Bitcoin could face stronger selling pressure than what retail alone might typically drive.
Key takeaways
- Olson’s chart work suggests BTC could fall toward $23,980 if US equities undergo a macro downturn of roughly 50%+.
- A negative Coinbase premium is consistent with weaker professional demand rather than aggressive institutional accumulation.
- Since May, SoSoValue data shows US spot Bitcoin ETFs have logged $4.68 billion in net outflows.
- On-chain analyst Darkfost argues institutions tend to wait for confirmation and performance, making them less likely to “buy the bottom” prematurely.
Olson’s worst-case BTC level and the macro trigger
Olson shared a two-week Bitcoin chart outlining a potential pathway for downside under stress conditions. His level is derived from a proprietary Market Sniper Pro VWAP indicator, using a long-term support line based on an anchored, volume-weighted average price (aVWAP) concept.
In the chart framing Olson used, the line appears anchored from the 2022 bear-market bottom. As the chart progresses, that methodology effectively creates a sloping reference zone that traders can watch for whether price is respecting a longer-term “average” support framework—or breaking away from it.
Olson presented $23,980 as a base-case target in a “severe macro sell-off” scenario that includes a US stock market drop of more than 50%. The implication is straightforward: Bitcoin has often traded like a high-risk asset during periods when leveraged positions are unwound and liquidity becomes expensive.
The macro timing risk Olson warns about is not confined to crypto technicals. The article context also references calls from established market observers who have warned about speculative excess or heightened recession risk. For example, GMO co-founder Jeremy Grantham has argued the current AI-led market surge resembles a major speculative bubble, while economist Gary Shilling has warned a US recession is “almost inevitable” by year-end, with stocks potentially declining by 20%–30%. (Those perspectives are cited via links embedded in the original reporting.)
Against that backdrop, the logic for Bitcoin is that a broad equity shock could accelerate crypto de-risking. In practical trading terms, that can mean earlier longs are forced to reduce exposure, and new dip-buying interest—particularly institutional—may take longer to reappear.
Coinbase Premium stays negative, signaling weak “professional” appetite
Beyond chart levels, the report highlights the Coinbase Premium Index—a metric that compares Bitcoin’s price on Coinbase versus Binance. The underlying idea is that when the premium is positive, it often reflects stronger US institutional demand (or at least more aggressive buying pressure on regulated venues). When the reading stays negative, it can point to weaker professional accumulation or heavier selling on Coinbase relative to Binance.
According to the report’s description, the Coinbase premium has been largely negative so far in 2026. That matters because it suggests that, at least in this period, institutional-style demand has not stepped in with the same urgency seen during stronger risk-on phases.
The key tension for traders is that BTC’s price can still rise without sustained premium strength—especially if retail-driven flows dominate. But if the market later shifts into “risk-off,” a lack of steady institutional bid can make drawdowns more abrupt, because there is less natural demand to cushion sell pressure.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs record $4.68B in outflows since May
The institutional-demand picture is reinforced by spot Bitcoin ETF flow data cited from SoSoValue. The report states that since May, US-based spot Bitcoin funds have accumulated $4.68 billion in net outflows.
ETF flow trends are closely watched by many participants because they aggregate buying and selling behavior across traditional brokerage accounts and investment platforms. Net outflows, in that sense, can be read as ongoing caution from professional allocators and advisers rather than a one-off profit-taking event.
While the report doesn’t attempt to forecast ETF flows forward, the combination of negative Coinbase premium and ETF outflows fits the same broader narrative: there isn’t clear evidence, at least in the period referenced, that major institutional channels are actively leaning against weakness.
Why institutions may wait for “confirmation,” not a potential bottom
One reason analysts often provide for institutional behavior under stress is that these players may not buy based on technical “support” signals alone. Instead, they may wait for confirmation—whether that’s stabilization in broader markets, improved volatility conditions, or sustained improvements in inflows.
In a Sunday post cited in the report, Darkfost, a CryptoQuant-associated on-chain analyst, said: institutions “don’t act like retail” and typically operate under “permanent risk management logic.” Darkfost’s point, as quoted, was that institutions are “not looking to buy a potential bottom” but rather for confirmation and performance—adding that the conditions for that are “not the case yet.”
This helps explain why Olson’s downside framing could matter even if the $23,980 area is technically meaningful. If institutional demand is missing—or if ETF outflows continue—then market moves toward lower support zones may be driven less by “buying opportunity” narratives and more by positioning adjustments and liquidity constraints.
Earlier coverage referenced in the report also aligns with the idea that a stock-market crash could push Bitcoin below $30,000. While those earlier remarks are not elaborated in detail here, they strengthen the broader theme: macro shocks can overwhelm crypto’s internal narratives and magnify downside through forced de-risking.
For readers, the key watch items are straightforward: whether BTC’s technical structure actually breaks toward the $23,980 target, and whether institutional indicators change character—specifically the Coinbase premium trend and whether spot Bitcoin ETFs shift from net outflows to inflows. If those signals remain weak, the market may continue to treat rallies as temporary while waiting for broader risk conditions to improve.
US Vice President JD Vance opened direct US-Iran talks at Switzerland’s Bürgenstock resort on Sunday, even as President Donald Trump threatened fresh military strikes if Tehran fails to rein in Hezbollah.
The talks implement a 14-point memorandum that Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed on June 17. It set a 60-day ceasefire to end a war that began on February 28 and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
US-Iran Talks Open Under Pressure
Vance leads the US side, with Iranian chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf heading Tehran’s team. Pakistan and Qatar are mediating in a four-way format.
The talks nearly fell apart first. Iran suspended them on Friday over Israel’s strikes in Lebanon, then agreed to meet on Sunday. Vance expects only a couple of days of negotiations.
Washington wants fast movement on Iran’s nuclear program. Tehran wants the fighting in Lebanon to stop first. It is also seeking sanctions relief, the unfreezing of assets, and an end to the US naval blockade.
The truce is fraying. Israeli strikes killed dozens in Lebanon over the weekend, and five Israeli soldiers have died since the deal. The turmoil has even split crypto traders over whether the ceasefire holds.
Bitcoin (BTC) could swing again if the war reignites, a risk analysts have already war-gamed for crypto. Trump, meanwhile, escalated on Truth Social, warning Tehran over its Lebanese proxies.
“Iran must immediately stop their highly paid PROXIES in Lebanon from causing trouble. If they don’t, we’ll hit Iran very hard again, just like we did last week, only harder!!!” Donald Trump, US president, via post.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Why Crypto Markets are Watching Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz is the reason markets care. About 20 million barrels of oil cross it daily. That is close to a fifth of global supply and more than a quarter of seaborne trade.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard declared the waterway shut on Saturday, citing Israel’s attacks. Yet US Central Command said 55 tankers still passed through that day, carrying more than 17 million barrels.
After the signing, oil fell sharply, and equities set records. Brent crude slipped to about $78 a barrel, and US gas hit $3.99 a gallon, its lowest since March. GasBuddy analyst Patrick De Haan expects sub-$3 gas by early 2027 if the truce holds.
For crypto, the signal runs through oil. Cheaper energy cools inflation and revives rate-cut bets, the script Bitcoin has followed all year.
Yet Bitcoin barely reacted to the deal, holding near $64,000. Last June, a similar Iran ceasefire sent it above $105,000.
The next few days of talks will test whether the ceasefire survives in Lebanon. For crypto, the bigger tell may be oil, not the nuclear file.
The post Trump Issues Fresh Iran Threat as US-Iran Talks Enter Critical Phase appeared first on BeInCrypto.
HIVE Digital Technologies, a Nasdaq-listed infrastructure provider, says it has received approval from the municipal council of Boden to acquire the 32 megawatt Big Boden data centre in northern Sweden. The purchase, focused on long-term control of a key Nordic site, is designed to support HIVE’s plans to expand high-performance computing and AI workloads from within its existing Swedish footprint.
The Big Boden facility has supported HIVE’s operations since 2018. With the approval in place, the company moves from tenant arrangements to ownership, a shift that typically gives data centre operators greater flexibility over long-term capital planning, infrastructure upgrades, and operational resilience targets.
From tenant to owner at Big Boden
Municipal approval is a common procedural step in real estate and infrastructure transactions, particularly where utilities, permitting, and local planning requirements are involved. For HIVE, the significance is practical as well as strategic: a controlled asset can be upgraded on a longer horizon than leased capacity.
In its announcement, HIVE framed the acquisition as a milestone in its commitment to Sweden as a location for “sovereign” AI and sustainable digital infrastructure. The company has previously positioned its compute infrastructure around sustainability and green power sourcing, an increasingly important topic for enterprise AI buyers who face pressure to disclose and manage energy use.
Upgrade path toward Tier III-style capabilities
HIVE said it plans to bring the Boden site toward Tier III infrastructure standards. In data centre terms, that typically relates to higher expectations for redundancy and uptime, including design approaches meant to reduce the risk of unplanned outages. While the company did not provide a detailed timeline in the email update, it indicated the work is intended to strengthen security, redundancy, and uptime capabilities for enterprise-scale AI and high-performance computing workloads.
The company also referenced support for next-generation NVIDIA GPU architectures, pointing to a market demand shift across the industry. Data centre operators are increasingly competing not only on raw power capacity, but also on operational readiness for GPU-intensive deployments, including performance, reliability, and power delivery capabilities suitable for large-scale AI training or inference.
Why data centre ownership matters for compute strategy
In the broader market, many compute infrastructure firms rely on a mix of owned and contracted capacity. Ownership can reduce uncertainty when demand rises, but it also shifts execution risk to the operator, including capex planning, construction timelines, and regulatory compliance.
For companies pursuing AI-related workloads, the reliability dimension is critical. GPU clusters generally require steady power availability, robust cooling, and predictable uptime to maintain service quality for customers and internal deployments. Moving toward a higher tier standard can therefore be an operational necessity rather than a branding exercise.
HIVE’s move to own the Big Boden asset also aligns with a trend in which governments, enterprises, and regulated sectors seek local compute options. Whether referred to as “sovereign” compute, data residency, or strategic infrastructure, the underlying idea is the same, greater control over where workloads run and how infrastructure is governed.
Sustainability and local impact in the background
The email update included figures and context intended to show continuity of investment in the Boden region since HIVE’s earlier entry. It stated that HIVE has invested more than SEK 960 million in the region through local contractors and renewable energy procurement, and that it has contributed more than SEK 575 million in taxes to the Swedish Tax Authority. HIVE also pointed to local community involvement through initiatives such as support for youth and women’s hockey, sponsorship activity, and work linked to heat recovery projects.
While these points are not directly tied to the municipal approval itself, they help explain how data centre operators often build long-term social and regulatory relationships, particularly in markets where energy consumption, land use, and grid impact are recurring political topics.
Implications for HIVE and the Nordic AI infrastructure market
If HIVE executes its upgrade plan as described, the Big Boden facility could strengthen the company’s ability to serve enterprise and institutional customers looking for AI compute capacity in northern Europe. In practice, the key question for investors and customers will be how quickly capacity can be upgraded to the desired operational standard and how performance targets translate into usable capacity for GPU-based deployments.
HIVE also indicated the project fits into a broader strategy aimed at developing renewable-powered AI infrastructure across multiple jurisdictions. For the Nordic region specifically, the acquisition underscores ongoing competition among compute operators to secure energy-backed capacity and to position their facilities for AI workloads with higher reliability expectations.
For now, the municipal approval clears the way for the transaction and subsequent development plans. The next milestones will likely involve the deal completion process and disclosure around the scope and timing of upgrades at the 32 MW site.
Note: This update is based on information provided in the announcement circulated to the media.
Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor signaled another Bitcoin (BTC) purchase on Sunday, posting MicroStrategy’s tracker hours after he urged unity among Bitcoin holders.
The timing stands out. MicroStrategy’s most recent filing reported a small Bitcoin sale rather than a purchase, and the firm has disclosed no new buy in three weeks.
Michael Saylor Signals MicroStrategy’s Next Bitcoin Buy
The chart Saylor shared plots Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings against its average purchase price since 2020. Each orange dot marks a separate buy.
Strategy held 846,842 BTC as of this writing, according to a regulatory filing. At an average cost of $75,658, the position sits about 10% below cost.
Bitcoin was trading near $64,082 on Sunday, up 1.31% on the day. That values the holdings around $54.2 billion.
The caption fueled fresh purchase speculation, a familiar move from Saylor before past acquisitions. The firm, formerly MicroStrategy, began buying in 2020 and remains the largest corporate holder by a wide margin.
Saylor’s Unity Call Meets a Buying Slowdown
Hours earlier, Saylor urged the Bitcoin community to focus on its shared goals rather than internal disputes.
Bitcoiners agree on the 99% that matters. We shouldn’t let the 1% divide us while nearly all global capital has yet to enter Bitcoin’s monetary network. The opportunity is bigger than the argument,” he wrote.
The appeal lands during a clear pause. Strategy’s June 1 filing showed it sold 32 BTC for $2.5 million to fund preferred stock dividends.
That marked a rare step for a company built on accumulation. MicroStrategy pays an 11.50% annual rate on its STRC preferred shares, a cost it must cover with cash.
The same week, Strategy sold $128 million of common stock under its at-the-market program. Buying Bitcoin with stock and selling some to pay dividends sits at the center of the criticism.
Saylor has hinted at more buying even as the company slowed its weekly purchases. Supporters point to a stack still worth about $54 billion.
MicroStrategy typically files a Bitcoin update each Monday. The next one will show whether Saylor’s dots multiplied again, or whether the pause held.
The post Michael Saylor Teases Next Bitcoin Buy After Urging Community Unity appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Bitcoin moved back toward the mid-$60,000 range on Sunday, but the bounce came with fresh skepticism from traders as geopolitical risk flared again in the Middle East. BTC/USD reached a local high of $64,522 on Bitstamp before giving back roughly 0.5% on the day, according to TradingView data.
The lack of clean follow-through is being linked to a combination of macro uncertainty and persistent exchange-level selling pressure—factors that may influence how sustainable the current uptick really is.
Key takeaways
- BTC/USD traded around $64,000 after printing a $64,522 local high on Bitstamp, then slipped back by about 0.5%.
- Traders pointed to the renewed Strait of Hormuz closure and broader US-Iran tensions as reasons to stay cautious.
- Lennaert Snyder described the price action as “suspicious,” even while still identifying $66,000 as an upside target.
- Exitpump argued that Binance spot is still selling into the rally, with the latest move driven more by derivatives/perps than spot demand.
- Market chatter also highlighted an observation that recent Mondays often preceded local pivot highs.
BTC holds gains as Hormuz closure reignites risk
Despite further instability in the US-Iran conflict, Bitcoin maintained most of its prior gains. Iran reportedly closed the Strait of Hormuz again, while the “current peace deal” was cast as increasingly fragile—an uncertainty that tends to matter to markets not only through oil prices, but also through risk appetite more broadly.
The wider stand-off has been tied to Israeli strikes in Lebanon, with Iran warning that last week’s ceasefire could unravel. US President Donald Trump responded with sharp rhetoric, writing on Truth Social that “harder” strikes on Iran could follow.
For crypto traders, the immediate takeaway was not that BTC was collapsing under the news, but that the rally’s reliability was questioned. Snyder posted on X that BTC appeared to be “pumping with rising geopolitical tensions,” calling the behavior “very suspicious.” Snyder still framed the move as potentially part of an upside push, pointing to $66,000 as a reasonable target for this week.
Another trader, Killa, emphasized that the calendar may be relevant to near-term price behavior, noting a pattern from recent weeks: “Over the past six weeks, 6 out of 6 Mondays have marked a local pivot high before price moved lower.” The remark doesn’t guarantee the same outcome going forward, but it reflects how many desks are currently watching day-by-day technical timing rather than only headline risk.
Geopolitics keeps traders watching structure, not just direction
When geopolitical headlines tighten—especially involving the Strait of Hormuz—traders often reassess the robustness of breakouts. In this case, the market’s reaction was mixed: BTC pushed to fresh intraday highs but then retraced, suggesting that upside momentum may be constrained by traders waiting for clearer signals before adding exposure.
That dynamic can also be seen in the way traders discussed the rally. Rather than focusing solely on price levels, they highlighted “how” BTC was moving. Snyder’s concern about suspicious pumping and Killa’s reference to Monday pivot highs both point toward an active monitoring of whether the market is building a stable base—or simply spiking before rotating back lower.
For investors, the practical implication is that headline-driven volatility may increase the probability of sharp swings around key levels. The fact that BTC could touch $64,522 and still end the day slightly lower underscores that buyers have not yet fully taken control of the tape.
Binance order books suggest selling persists despite the bounce
While BTC’s chart may look constructive to some, exchange-level data is complicating the picture. Exitpump argued that order-book and short-interest dynamics on Binance indicate that the latest price rise is not being matched by spot accumulation in a straightforward way.
Exitpump wrote on X that, “Despite price slowly grinding higher, Binance spot continues to sell into the move,” adding that “Mostly perps driven move up.” The implication is that derivatives activity may be doing more of the heavy lifting than spot demand—an arrangement that can sometimes leave the market more fragile if leverage unwinds.
This is not the first time that Binance-related sell pressure has been highlighted in coverage. Earlier reporting from Cointelegraph cited persistent “aggressive” selling from Binance as a reason bulls faced resistance. The new commentary builds on that theme by framing the most recent uptick as potentially derivatives-led rather than driven by consistent spot buying.
For traders, this distinction matters because derivatives-led moves can reverse quickly if funding rates, open interest, or short positioning shifts. Spot sell pressure, meanwhile, can cap rallies by ensuring that every attempt to push higher meets sustained supply on the order book.
What to watch next: follow-through versus derivatives-led spikes
Bitcoin’s ability to hold above the $64,000 area—and, specifically, whether it can regain momentum toward $66,000—will likely depend on two things: whether geopolitical volatility translates into broader risk-off selling, and whether spot pressure on major venues like Binance continues to outweigh spot demand. Traders are watching Monday timing patterns and the reliability of the rally’s structure, but the market’s next moves should reveal whether the current strength is sustainable or merely a brief, leverage-assisted push.
A Japanese pension fund plans to shift about 1% of its assets into cryptocurrency from fiscal 2026, treating Bitcoin (BTC) as a hedge against a weakening dollar rather than a bet on price gains.
The National Business Corporate Pension Fund, based in Okayama, manages around $136 million for about 1,200 small and medium-sized firms. Few Japanese pension funds have invested directly in digital assets.
A Currency Hedge, Not a Price Bet
The fund’s executive director of investment, Aiyu Kiguchi, said the US dollar may lose its global reserve status. So the fund is trimming dollar exposure instead of adding to it.
Meanwhile, the yen trades near 161 per dollar, ranging within the lower segment while eroding a portfolio still four-fifths held in yen.
That concern is not unfounded. The dollar’s share of global reserves has eased to about 57%, from roughly 71% in 2001, IMF data shows.
Bitcoin shows little correlation with the dollar index, which the fund treats as protection against currency debasement. The token will sit beside gold and emerging-market currencies in a small diversification sleeve.
The fund will not buy crypto directly. Instead, it plans to gain exposure through a passive, multi-token fund run by a major hedge fund.
The shift cuts its yen holdings from 80% to 70%, with developed-market currencies and the crypto stake filling the gap.
Why the Japanese Pension Fund Move Matters
Japan’s giant Government Pension Investment Fund only sought details on Bitcoin and gold in 2024 and never committed.
This far smaller fund is the one actually acting. It grew from a pension plan for Okayama’s machinery and metal makers, industries long exposed to currency swings.
The contrast with the United States is sharp. The State of Wisconsin Investment Board established a Bitcoin ETF position valued at about $321 million.
It then sold all of it within months, according to its SEC filings. Most US pension exposure has come through exchange-traded funds (ETFs) as a tactical trade, not Japan’s currency-hedge logic.
Kiguchi reached his decision after about six years of study, concluding the market had matured.
The move reflects Japan’s growing interest in Bitcoin as the country moves to regulate crypto as a financial instrument.
The Okayama fund is already studying multi-token arbitrage, a sign its 1% position could grow if other small-business plans follow.
The post Japanese Pension Fund Plans Crypto Allocation to Hedge Dollar Risk appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Bitcoin (BTC) could tumble by over 60% to under $24,000 in 2026, according to technical analyst Jesse Olson, if the stock market experiences a major crash.
Key takeaways:
- A US stock market crash of over 50% may accelerate BTC’s sell-off.
- Negative Coinbase premium and persistent ETF outflows hint at de-risking among institutional investors.
Bitcoin chart flags $23,980 worst-case downside target
In a Sunday post, Olson shared a two-week Bitcoin chart showing BTC potentially falling toward $23,980, based on a long-term volume-weighted support line from his proprietary Market Sniper Pro VWAP indicator.
BTC/USD two-week price chart. Source: TradingView/Jesse Olson
The yellow line on the chart represents a custom version of anchored volume-weighted average price (aVWAP), a tool traders use to track the average price of an asset, weighted by volume, from a specific starting point.
In Bitcoin’s case, Olson appears to have anchored the line from the 2022 bear market bottom, allowing it to slope forward as a potential long-term support zone.
Olson presented the $23,980 level as his base-case Bitcoin forecast in a severe macro sell-off, wherein the stock market drops by over 50%. The type of stress Olson warns about is already being flagged by veteran market observers.
For instance, GMO co-founder Jeremy Grantham has called the ongoing AI market boom a major speculative bubble. While Michael Burry has compared the current rally to the final stages of the Dot-com mania.
Related: Arthur Hayes dumps HYPE, NEAR as he warns of AI IPO wave
Economist Gary Shilling has also warned that a US recession is “almost inevitable” by year-end, with stocks at risk of a 20%–30% decline.
BTC often trades like a high-risk asset during market stress. A deep stock-market sell-off could force investors to cut crypto exposure, turning Olson’s $23,980 level into a key downside level to watch.
Bitcoin institutional demand remains weak
Another bearish signal comes from the Coinbase Premium Index, which tracks Bitcoin’s price gap between Coinbase and Binance.
A positive premium usually points to stronger US institutional demand, while a negative reading suggests weaker professional buying or heavier selling on Coinbase.
In Bitcoin’s case, the index has largely remained negative so far in 2026, showing that institutional buyers are still not stepping in with conviction.
Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Index vs. price. Source: CryptoQuant/Darkfost
Spot Bitcoin ETFs are showing a similar trend. Since May, the US-based funds have recorded $4.68 billion in net outflows, according to SoSoValue data, reflecting weaker demand from professional investors and other ETF buyers.
US Bitcoin ETF net flows. Source: SoSoValue
“These investors don’t act like retail,” said Darkfost, a CryptoQuant-associated on-chain analyst, in a Sunday post, adding:
“They operate under permanent risk management logic, they’re not looking to buy a potential bottom, they’re looking for confirmation, for performance. And that’s not the case yet.”
In the past, multiple analysts, including Galaxy Digital’s Alex Thorn and pseudonymous trader Crypto Kid, have said Bitcoin could decline below $30,000 in the event of a stock market crash.
The Boroughs Threw a Real Car Off a Cliff
“Just go home, Rory. F****** hell!” – Rory McIlroy’s frustrations spill over at US Open
Yamal scores first World Cup goal as Spain bounce back with thumping win over Saudi Arabia
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Miami – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World7 days agoZimbabwe Requires Crypto Businesses to Register Annually Under New FIU Regulations
-
Business2 days agoWall Street Week Ahead: Investors see Micron earnings as pulse check of AI rally momentum
-
Entertainment7 days agoMatt Damon’s Viral Sci-Fi Thriller Has Taken Over HBO Max
-
Crypto World2 days agoHIVE shares jump as $220M AI deal speeds Bitcoin mining pivot
-
Business7 days agoAnthropic staff to meet White House officials next week, Axios reports
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin could crash to $48,000, if this historical pattern is triggered
-
NewsBeat7 days agowhat doctors are seeing in ebike crashes
-
NewsBeat7 days agoWarning of disruption as Cardiff Crossrail works to start
-
NewsBeat7 days agoTributes to former deputy head teacher at Cambridge school among death and funeral notices
-
Entertainment7 days agoKate Middleton Glare Goes Viral After Kids Booed At Royal Event
-
Politics7 days ago“Israel’s” ban on ICRC visits ruled illegal, but Knesset moves to stop them permanently
-
Crypto World7 days agoXRP ETFs Outperform As Bitcoin And Ethereum Funds Extend Outflow Trend
-
Tech7 days agoOver 400 Arch Linux packages compromised to push rootkit, infostealer
-
News Videos7 days agoFinancial Accounting | Last Day Revision Strategy and Booster | CMA Inter – June 2026
-
Sports7 days agoDick Advocaat’s Curacao scores first-ever World Cup goal against Germany
-
Business7 days agoInvesco Quality Income Fund Q1 2026 Commentary
-
NewsBeat7 days agoSinger Oliver Tree dies aged 32 in helicopter crash in Brazil
-
Tech5 days agoThe Adder At The Heart Of Intel’s 8087 FPU
-
Tech7 days agoMicrosoft Updates Six Windows’ Apps. ‘Photos’ Gets Watermarks for Copilot Images (Off by Default)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login