Connect with us

Crypto World

The Next Paradigm Shift Beyond Large Language Models

Published

on

The Next Paradigm Shift Beyond Large Language Models

Artificial Intelligence has made extraordinary progress over the last decade, largely driven by the rise of large language models (LLMs). Systems such as GPT-style models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, leading AI researchers increasingly argue that we are approaching diminishing returns with purely text-based, token-prediction architectures.

One of the most influential voices in this debate is Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, who has consistently advocated for a new direction in AI research: World Models. These systems aim to move beyond pattern recognition toward a deeper, more grounded understanding of how the world works.

In this article, we explore what world models are, how they differ from large language models, why they matter, and which open-source world model projects are currently shaping the field.

What Are World Models?

At their core, world models are AI systems that learn internal representations of the environment, allowing them to simulate, predict, and reason about future states of the world.

Advertisement

Rather than mapping inputs directly to outputs, a world model builds a latent model of reality—a kind of internal mental simulation. This enables the system to answer questions such as:

  • What is likely to happen next?
  • What would happen if I take this action?
  • Which outcomes are plausible or impossible?

This approach mirrors how humans and animals learn. We do not simply react to stimuli; we form internal models that let us anticipate consequences, plan actions, and avoid costly mistakes.

Yann LeCun views world models as a foundational component of human-level artificial intelligence, particularly for systems that must interact with the physical world.

Why Large Language Models Are Not Enough

Large language models are fundamentally statistical sequence predictors. They excel at identifying patterns in massive text corpora and predicting the next token given context. While this produces fluent and often impressive outputs, it comes with inherent limitations.

Key Limitations of LLMs

Lack of grounded understanding: LLMs are trained primarily on text rather than on physical experience.

Advertisement

Weak causal reasoning: They capture correlations rather than true cause-and-effect relationships.

No internal physics or common sense model:
They cannot reliably reason about space, time, or physical constraints.

Reactive rather than proactive: They respond to prompts but do not plan or act autonomously.

As LeCun has repeatedly stated,
predicting words is not the same as understanding the world.

Advertisement

How World Models Differ from Traditional Machine Learning

World models represent a significant departure from both classical supervised learning and modern deep learning pipelines.

Self-Supervised Learning at Scale

World models typically learn in a self-supervised or unsupervised manner. Instead of relying on labelled datasets, they learn by:

Predicting future states from past observations

  • Filling in missing sensory information
  • Learning latent representations from raw data such as video, images, or sensor streams
  • This mirrors biological learning: humans and animals acquire vast amounts of knowledge simply by observing the world, not by receiving explicit labels.

Core Components of a World Model

A practical world model architecture usually consists of three key elements:

1. Perception Module

Advertisement

Encodes raw sensory inputs (e.g. images, video, proprioception) into a compact latent representation.

2. Dynamics Model

Learns how the latent state evolves over time, capturing causality and temporal structure.

3. Planning or Control Module

Advertisement

Uses the learned model to simulate future trajectories and select actions that optimise a goal.

This separation allows the system to think before it acts, dramatically improving efficiency and safety.

Practical Applications of World Models

World models are particularly valuable in domains where real-world experimentation is expensive, slow, or dangerous.

Robotics

Advertisement



Robots equipped with world models can predict the physical consequences of their actions, for example, whether grasping one object will destabilise others nearby.

Autonomous Vehicles

By simulating multiple future driving scenarios internally, world models enable safer planning under uncertainty.

Advertisement

Game Playing and Simulated Environments

World models allow agents to learn strategies without exhaustive trial-and-error in the real environment.

Industrial Automation

Factories and warehouses benefit from AI systems that can anticipate failures, optimise workflows, and adapt to changing conditions.

Advertisement

In all these cases, the ability to simulate outcomes before acting is a decisive advantage.

Open-Source World Model Projects You Should Know

The field of world models is still emerging, but several open-source initiatives are already making a significant impact.

1. World Models (Ha & Schmidhuber)

One of the earliest and most influential projects, introducing the idea of learning a compressed latent world model using VAEs and RNNs. This work demonstrated that agents could learn effective policies almost entirely inside their own simulated worlds.

Advertisement

2. Dreamer / DreamerV2 / DreamerV3 (DeepMind, open research releases)

Dreamer agents learn a latent dynamics model and use it to plan actions in imagination rather than the real environment, achieving strong performance in continuous control tasks.

3. PlaNet

A model-based reinforcement learning system that plans directly in latent space, reducing sample complexity.

Advertisement

4. MuZero (Partially Open)

While not fully open source, MuZero introduced a powerful concept: learning a dynamics model without explicitly modelling environment rules, combining planning with representation learning.

5. Meta’s JEPA (Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures)

Yann LeCun’s preferred paradigm, JEPA focuses on predicting abstract representations rather than raw pixels, forming a key building block for future world models.

Advertisement

These projects collectively signal a shift away from brute-force scaling toward structured, model-based intelligence.

Are We Seeing Diminishing Returns from LLMs?

While LLMs continue to improve, their progress increasingly depends on:

  • More data
  • Larger models
  • Greater computational cost

World models offer an alternative path: learning more efficiently by understanding structure rather than memorising patterns. Many researchers believe the future of AI lies in hybrid systems that combine language models with world models that provide grounding, memory, and planning.

Why World Models May Be the Next Breakthrough

World models address some of the most fundamental weaknesses of current AI systems:

They enable common-sense reasoning

Advertisement
  • They support long-term planning
  • They allow safe exploration
  • They reduce dependence on labelled data
  • They bring AI closer to real-world interaction

For applications such as robotics, autonomous systems, and embodied AI, world models are not optional; they are essential.

Conclusion

World models represent a critical evolution in artificial intelligence, moving beyond language-centric systems toward agents that can truly understand, predict, and interact with the world. As Yann LeCun argues, intelligence is not about generating text, but about building internal models of reality.

With increasing open-source momentum and growing industry interest, world models are likely to play a central role in the next generation of AI systems. Rather than replacing large language models, they may finally give them what they lack most: a grounded understanding of the world they describe.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Extreme FUD Persists on Social Media Despite BTC’s $60K Dip Recovery

Published

on

FUD Takes Over Crypto Social Media in Retail Selloff: Santiment 


Extreme FUD lingers after Bitcoin’s $60,000 rebound, with bearish social sentiment outweighing bullish posts.

Bitcoin (BTC) slipped back below $67,000 on Wednesday, February 11, extending a volatile stretch that began with last week’s drop to $60,000.

Despite that rebound from the lows, social data shows fear remains elevated, with traders split over whether the worst of the sell-off is over.

Advertisement

Social Sentiment Stays Bearish as Volatility Spikes

Data shared by on-chain analytics firm Santiment shows a high ratio of bearish to bullish posts even after Bitcoin recovered from its $60,000 dip. According to the firm, retail traders seem hesitant to buy at current levels, while larger holders are facing less resistance in accumulating during periods of fear.

Santiment added that, historically, rebounds have often followed spikes in fear, though it did not claim this guarantees a bottom.

Meanwhile, short-term price action is still fragile, with market watcher Ash Crypto reporting that Bitcoin’s fall below $67,000 had liquidated roughly $127 million in long positions within four hours.

At the time of writing, market data from CoinGecko showed BTC trading around the $66,700 region, down about 3% in the last 24 hours and nearly 13% on the week. Over the past 30 days, the flagship cryptocurrency has fallen more than 27%, and it remains 47% below its October 2025 all-time high.

Advertisement

The 24-hour range between $66,600 and $69,900 is a reflection of ongoing intraday swings, while weekly price action has spanned from about $62,800 to $76,500, showing just how unstable conditions are.

You may also like:

Volatility metrics support that view, with Binance data cited by Arab Chain analysts showing that Bitcoin’s seven-day annualized volatility has climbed to around 1.51, its highest reading since 2022. However, 30-day and 90-day measures remain lower at 0.81 and 0.56, suggesting recent turbulence has not yet evolved into a sustained high-volatility regime. According to the analysts, the average true range as a percentage sits near 0.075, which historically has been a compressed level that often comes right before a larger directional move.

Bear Market Comparisons Resurface

An earlier report this week noted that Bitcoin has closed three consecutive weeks below its 100-week moving average, a pattern seen in previous bear markets. CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju wrote on February 9 that “Bitcoin is not pumpable right now,” arguing that selling pressure is limiting upside follow-through.

Other commentators, including Doctor Profit, have described the current structure as a wide consolidation range between $57,000 and $87,000, warning that sideways trading could precede another leg lower.

Advertisement

Furthermore, macro data is adding to the cautious tone, with XWIN Research Japan writing that weaker U.S. retail sales and easing wage growth mean that consumption is slowing, which may weigh on risk assets in the short term. The firm also noted a persistently negative Coinbase Premium Gap since late 2025, suggesting there’s weak U.S. spot demand compared to derivatives-driven activity.

Yet not all industry voices are focused solely on price cycles, with WeFi’s Maksym Sakharov saying he believes Bitcoin sentiment will eventually strengthen despite falling prices, but for different reasons than in past rallies.

“I believe Bitcoin sentiment will turn even stronger despite the falling prices, but this time it won’t be only about price or speculation, but also about real adoption,” Sakharov said.

In the meantime, BTC is sitting in a narrow zone between fear-driven pessimism and technical support near $60,000, with traders watching whether high volatility resolves higher or breaks lower in the weeks ahead.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Franklin Templeton to Let Tokenized Money Funds Back Binance Trades

Published

on

Franklin Templeton to Let Tokenized Money Funds Back Binance Trades

Global investment manager Franklin Templeton announced the launch of an institutional off‑exchange collateral program with Binance that lets clients use tokenized money market fund (MMF) shares to back trading activity while the underlying assets remain in regulated custody. 

According to a Wednesday news release shared with Cointelegraph, the framework is intended to reduce counterparty risk by reflecting collateral balances inside Binance’s trading environment, rather than moving client assets onto the exchange.

​Eligible institutions can pledge tokenized MMF shares issued via Franklin Templeton’s Benji Technology Platform as collateral for trading on Binance. 

The tokenized fund shares are held off‑exchange by Ceffu Custody, a digital asset custodian licensed and supervised in Dubai, while their collateral value is mirrored on Binance to support trading positions.​

Advertisement

Franklin Templeton said the model was designed to let institutions earn yield on regulated money market fund holdings while using the same assets to support digital asset trading, without giving up existing custody or regulatory protections. 

Related: Franklin Templeton expands Benji tokenization platform to Canton Network

“Our off‑exchange collateral program is just that: letting clients easily put their assets to work in regulated custody while safely earning yield in new ways,” said Roger Bayston, head of digital assets at Franklin Templeton, in the release.​

Franklin Templeton and Binance Collaboration. Source: Franklin Templeton

The initiative builds on a strategic collaboration between Binance and Franklin Templeton announced in 2025 to develop tokenization products that combine regulated fund structures with global trading infrastructure. 

Off‑exchange collateral to cut counterparty risk

​The design mirrors other tokenized real‑world asset collateral models in crypto markets. BlackRock’s BUIDL tokenized US Treasury fund, issued by Securitize, for example, is also accepted as trading collateral on Binance, as well as other platforms, including Crypto.com and Deribit.

Advertisement

That model allows institutional clients to post a low-volatility, yield‑bearing instrument instead of idle stablecoins or more volatile tokens.

Other issuers and venues, including WisdomTree’s WTGXX and Ondo’s OUSG, are exploring similar models, with tokenized bond and short‑term credit funds increasingly positioned as onchain collateral in both centralized and decentralized markets.

Related: WisdomTree’s USDW stablecoin to pay dividends on tokenized assets

Regulators flag cross‑border tokenization risks

Despite the trend of using tokenized MMFs as collateral, global regulators have warned that cross‑border tokenization structures can introduce new risks. 

Advertisement

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has cautioned that tokenized instruments used across multiple jurisdictions may exploit differences between national regimes and enable regulatory arbitrage if oversight and supervisory cooperation do not keep pace.

Cointelegraph asked Franklin Templeton how the tokenized MMF shares are regulated and protected and how the model was stress‑tested for extreme scenarios, but had not received a reply by publication.

Magazine: Getting scammed for 100 Bitcoin led Sunny Lu to create VeChain