Connect with us

Crypto World

UAE-Backed Investor Snags 49% in Trump-Linked Crypto Firm for $500M

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

A UAE-backed investment vehicle quietly agreed to buy nearly half of World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency startup linked to President Donald Trump, just days before he returned to the White House, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

Aryam Investment 1, an Abu Dhabi entity backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, signed a deal in January 2025 to purchase a 49% stake in World Liberty Financial for $500 million, the Journal said, citing documents and people familiar with the matter. Half of that amount was paid upfront, sending $187 million to Trump family‑controlled entities, with additional tens of millions flowing to entities tied to co-founders, including relatives of US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, according to the report. The agreement was reportedly signed by Eric Trump. The Journal noted that the deal had not been publicly disclosed at the time, even as World Liberty later disclosed that the Trump family’s stake had fallen sharply.

The collaboration sits at the intersection of geopolitical investment, crypto fundraising, and political entanglements that have periodically resurfaced in Washington and on Wall Street. While the deal was described as a purely private transaction between Aryam Investment 1 and World Liberty Financial, it has drawn scrutiny because WLFI’s own governance model channels a substantial portion of token revenue to entities tied to the Trump family, raising questions about conflicts of interest and governance integrity in crypto ventures with political stakes.

Tahnoon’s ambitions grow after Trump election

Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE president’s brother and the country’s national security adviser, has positioned Abu Dhabi as a global hub for artificial intelligence and high‑tech investment. During the Biden era, his push to license and secure advanced U.S.-made chips faced obstacles amid concerns about sensitive technology reaching China, including through firms associated with the UAE’s tech giant G42. After the 2024 election, a shift in emphasis appeared to accelerate collaboration with Washington on AI and semiconductor access, with Tahnoon meeting repeatedly with Trump and senior U.S. officials as policymakers weighed new frameworks for tech collaboration and export controls. Within months, reports emerged of the United States committing to provide the UAE access to hundreds of thousands of advanced AI chips annually, a development observers tied to a broader strategy of aligning security interests with technology partnerships.

Advertisement

The Journal noted that executives from G42 helped manage Aryam Investment 1 and took board seats at World Liberty as part of the deal, effectively making Aryam the startup’s largest outside shareholder. In the meantime, another Tahnoon‑led firm, MGX, reportedly used World Liberty’s stablecoin to complete a $2 billion investment into Binance—a move that occurred weeks before the U.S.-UAE chip framework was announced. WLFI’s governance structure has remained controversial, with critics arguing that a majority of token revenue ultimately flows to entities tied to the Trump family, potentially influencing outcomes in a project that operates at the confluence of crypto finance and political influence.

World Liberty and the White House have publicly denied any wrongdoing. Spokespeople told the Journal that President Trump was not involved in the deal and that it did not provide any leverage over U.S. policy. The company and its supporters argue that private sector investments in digital assets are common and should be judged on commercial grounds rather than political implications. Still, the ties between a state-backed investor, a Trump‑connected crypto project, and a governance model that centralizes revenue on a single family’s entities have kept the story in lawmakers’ sights and on the radar of crypto watchers who track how policy and capital interact in the sector.

Recent reporting has underscored the broader risk landscape surrounding WLFI and its token sales. In particular, U.S. lawmakers have raised concerns about whether WLFI conducted governance token sales in ways that could circumvent sanctions regimes or enable illicit actors to gain influence over a high‑stakes crypto enterprise. The debate intensified as critics pointed to blockchain addresses associated with sanctioned actors and other regions that the Wall Street Journal’s reporting connected to WLFI token dynamics.

World Liberty faces US probe calls

Last year, Democratic senators urged regulators to scrutinize WLFI’s token offerings amid concerns about improper governance and potential links to sanctioned entities. In a November letter to the Justice Department and Treasury, Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed cited claims that WLFI governance tokens were moved through blockchain addresses linked to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, as well as entities with Russian and Iranian associations. The letter urged authorities to examine whether WLFI’s sale and distribution practices violated existing sanctions or other federal rules. The controversy has been further complicated by WLFI’s ownership structure, which concentrates token revenue in Trump family‑affiliated channels, raising questions about governance and accountability in a political‑crypto hybrid business.

Advertisement
  • The WSJ’s reporting on Aryam Investment 1’s $500 million stake in WLFI and the related cash transfers to Trump family entities.
  • The involvement of G42 executives in Aryam’s governance and the board seats they secured at World Liberty.
  • Regulatory and congressional scrutiny over WLFI token sales, including a November letter from Warren and Reed citing sanction concerns.
  • Public denials from World Liberty and the White House about any wrongdoing or policy leverage arising from the deal.

Why it matters

The episode spotlights how geopolitical capital, crypto fundraising, and political entanglements can intersect in ways that prompt questions about governance, transparency, and risk management in digital-asset ventures. When a state-backed investor channels hundreds of millions into a crypto startup that ties revenue to a political family, observers worry about conflicts of interest, the potential for policy influence, and the adequacy of independent governance in a sector that remains under intense regulatory scrutiny.

From a policy perspective, the arrangement underscores the ongoing challenge for regulators and lawmakers: how to distinguish legitimate strategic investment from arrangements that might create perverse incentives or circumvent safeguards. The scrutiny over WLFI’s token sales—tied to sanctioned actors per a congressional letter—highlights the delicate balance between encouraging innovation and enforcing sanctions, anti-money-laundering, and know-your-customer standards in a rapidly evolving ecosystem. The denials from WLFI and the White House provide a counterpoint, but they do little to quell broader questions about accountability when political and financial interests converge in crypto ventures.

For the market, the case reinforces the importance of clear disclosures and robust governance when politically connected entities participate in crypto projects. It also signals that geopolitics can continue to shape investor sentiment and regulatory expectations in crypto, influencing which partnerships endure and how tokens are valued. As the U.S. and its allies negotiate frameworks around technology sharing, export controls, and AI governance, the fate of WLFI and similar ventures may hinge on whether transparency and independent oversight can withstand heightened political scrutiny.

What to watch next

  • Regulatory responses: any formal inquiries or filings related to WLFI’s token governance, sanctions implications, or the Aryam‑World Liberty arrangement.
  • Public disclosures: whether WLFI or World Liberty release additional details about ownership, token distributions, or new governance clauses addressing revenue flows.
  • Policy developments: updates to the US‑UAE chip framework or related AI export controls that may affect future cross‑border crypto investments.
  • Governance shifts: any changes in the board composition of World Liberty and how those changes influence decision‑making and fund flows.

Sources & verification

  • Wall Street Journal reporting on Aryam Investment 1’s 49% stake for $500 million in World Liberty Financial, including the upfront payment to Trump family entities.
  • WSJ coverage of G42 involvement and board appointments as part of the World Liberty deal.
  • Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed’s November letter to the Justice Department and Treasury regarding WLFI token sales and sanction‑related concerns, cited in public reporting.
  • Public denials from World Liberty Financial and the White House about wrongdoing or policy leverage arising from the deal.

Market reaction and key details

The broader market context for this development is one of ongoing scrutiny around crypto fundraising, governance, and political entanglements. While the deal underscores how strategic state-backed capital can intersect with crypto startups, it also underscores why investors and policy makers alike are watching how these relationships are disclosed and governed. In a sector that prizes speed and secrecy, the need for transparent governance structures and clear accountability mechanisms has never been more evident. The interplay between geopolitical interests, high‑profile personalities, and digital asset ventures will likely continue to shape both policy debates and market behavior in the months ahead.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Buterin Offloads ETH, Bitcoin Unable to Push Past $70K, XRP Spot Buying Increases: This Week’s Crypto Recap

Published

on

Screenshot 2026-02-27 at 18.05.37


Bitcoin played a trick on us this week, making us believe that a recovery is inbound but the positivity was for not.

It’s been a relatively dynamic week within the cryptocurrency industry. The total market capitalization currently stands at around $2.36 trillion, which is more or less where it was last Friday when we did the previous weekly recap, but this doesn’t paint the whole picture.

You see, BTC started the week as anyone would expect – chopping to the downside, which inevitably led to an abrupt crash on Monday, when it dropped from above $67K to around $64K. This was followed by an intraday dead cat bounce and an immediate continuation to below $63,000. Sentiment was down bad, as was most of Crypto Twitter, but what followed raised a few eyebrows.

Advertisement

Bitcoin actually started recovering… notably. It soared from $63K to $70K in less than two days. And then came yet another sign that we are amidst the depths of crypto winter – the recovery was put to a halt, and the bears once again took control, pushing the price down to where we currently sit at slightly above $66K. In case you are wondering, we are still in a state of “extreme fear,” according to the popular Crypto Fear and Greed index, meaning that the masses are definitely not convinced that the worst is behind us. In fact, the most recent bounce did very little to improve the overall sentiment.

Meanwhile, the co-founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, continues selling ETH. So far, his total disposals reached around 18,700 ETH, even though he previously stated that he plans to sell 16,384 ETH to fund open-source software and hardware development, privacy tools, and security-critical infrastructure projects.

Elsewhere, we have some light at the end of the tunnel for XRP holders, with spot buying seemingly on the rise. While it has done little for the price so far, this could be a sign of a structural shift in XRP’s market dynamics. Bitrue reported a 212% surge in spot buying on February 26th, most of which was linked to ETF inflows, suggesting steady demand from funds.

All in all, the week started off as depressing, turned bullish, and then went back exactly to where it was in the beginning. Strength is being dissolved quickly as negative sentiment prevails, which is incredibly indicative of bear markets. That also makes it quite exciting to see what the next seven days have in store for us.

Advertisement

Market Data

Screenshot 2026-02-27 at 18.05.37
Source: Quantify Crypto

Market Cap: $2.35T | 24H Vol: $113B | BTC Dominance: 56.1%

You may also like:

BTC: $66,097 (-1.5%) | ETH: $1,947 (+0.2%) | XRP: $1.35 (-3.2%)

This Week’s Crypto Headlines You Can’t Miss

Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan Rejects Jane Street Blame for Bitcoin Dip. Matt Hougan, the chief investment officer at Bitwise, has dismissed claims that Jane Street is orchestrating Bitcoin’s ongoing downturn. Instead, he said that the current price action is typical of a “classic crypto winter.” Read more.

BSC Fees Hit Multi-Month Lows as History Signals Bitcoin Rebound Ahead. The Binance Smart Chain (BSC) saw its total fees paid drop to $593,000, which pretty much marks the network’s lowest usage cost since at least August 2025. Read more. 

2026 US Midterms Emerge as Potential Turning Point for Crypto Markets. The 2026 US midterm elections are closing in. Many view them as a potential catalyst that’s tied to liquidity cycles in traditional financial markets, as well as a recovery in the broader cryptocurrency market. Read more.

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s Recovery Isn’t Here Yet – Here’s What Still Needs to Flip. Data shows that BTC remains trapped in a structurally defensive consolidation. This happens as the price oscillates between $60K and $90K. Therefore, for a recovery to start shaping, the price needs to push above the upper boundary. Read more. 

Vitalik Buterin Exceeds 16,384 ETH Selling Target with $38M in Total Disposals. The co-founder of Ethereum (and likely the most prominent person behind it), Vitalik Buterin, is dumping ETH. In fact, he has exceeded his previously stated plan to sell 16,384 ETH by almost 20%. Read more.

Wall Street Is Going On-Chain, And Investors Still Don’t Get It, Says Bitwise CIO. According to the CIO of Bitwise, investors often misinterpret what is truly happening in the market due to behavioural biases and think that Wall Street is already going on-chain. Read more.

This week, we have a chart analysis of Ethereum, Ripple, Cardano, Binance Coin, and Hyperliquid – click here for the complete price analysis.

Advertisement
SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Bank With 14 Million Users Just Turned Bullish On Solana

Published

on

US Bank With 14 Million Users Just Turned Bullish On Solana

Major US Bank SoFi now supports Solana network deposits. This means 13.7 million users of the bank can send SOL directly to their SoFi crypto accounts from external wallets. 

The US-chartered bank announced the update on X, stating users can buy, sell and hold SOL inside the SoFi app.

Major Solana Access For US Banking Customers

In practice, SoFi is enabling direct on-chain deposits for a major public blockchain within a regulated national bank. Users can manage balances alongside checking, savings and other financial products in a single interface.

The move expands SoFi’s digital asset offering beyond simple brokerage-style exposure. It connects a traditional bank charter with a live blockchain network, which remains rare among nationally chartered US banks.

An Important US Access for Solana

SoFi began as a student loan refinancing platform in 2011 and later secured a national bank charter. It has grown into a mid-sized US bank with more than $50 billion in assets and tens of billions in deposits. 

While far smaller than Wall Street giants, it ranks among the larger digital-first banks in the country.

Advertisement

The company’s brand extends beyond finance. SoFi holds naming rights to SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. 

The venue hosted Super Bowl LVI in 2022 and WrestleMania 39 in 2023. It is also scheduled to host multiple matches during the 2026 FIFA World Cup and will play a central role in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.

The Famous SoFi Stadium in California. Source: HKS

Against that backdrop, adding Solana deposits signals deeper integration between US banking infrastructure and public blockchains. 

It allows regulated bank customers to move assets directly on-chain while staying inside a traditional banking framework.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Price Fell 40%, But Strong Holders Loaded 200% More

Published

on

Speculative Holders

XRP price has fallen nearly 40% since January 5, dropping from $2.35 to around $1.40. Moves of this size usually trigger panic selling and long-term damage to market structure. But this time, something very different happened.

Instead of accelerating the decline, one holder group stayed calm, while another, less enterprising, group quietly left. At the same time, leverage remained balanced and institutional flows stayed positive. Together, these signals suggest XRP’s crash may have strengthened its foundation rather than broken it.

Speculative Holders Collapsed — Removing the Biggest Source of Selling Pressure

One of the most important changes during XRP’s decline was the exit of speculative holders, as measured by the HODL Waves metric, which segments cohorts by time. These are short-term traders who typically hold for one day to one week and tend to sell quickly during volatility.

On February 8, these short-term holders controlled 2.29% of XRP’s total supply. By February 26, that figure had fallen sharply to just 0.579%. This represents a 74.7% decline in speculative supply share in less than three weeks. All while the price declined.

Advertisement
Speculative Holders
Speculative Holders: Glassnode

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

This kind of flush is important because speculative holders often create continuous selling pressure during rebounds. Their exit removes an unstable supply, allowing the price to stabilize. In simple terms, weak hands have already left. This reduces the risk of panic-driven crashes during future pullbacks.

But removing weak holders alone does not create strength. The more important question is whether strong holders also stayed.

Long-Term Holders Held Firm, Even as XRP Price Lost 40%

While XRP price collapsed, long-term holders behaved very differently.

The Hodler Net Position Change metric tracks whether investors holding for at least 155 days are buying or selling over a 30-day period. These holders are often considered the most informed participants because they typically accumulate during weak markets.

Advertisement

On January 5, when XRP traded near $2.35, long-term holders had added around 47.3 million XRP on a rolling monthly basis. By February 26, after XRP had dropped to around $1.40 (a 40% dip), their net position change had risen dramatically to approximately 145.45 million XRP, a 200% rise.

XRP Holders
XRP Holders: Glassnode

This means the largest and most patient holders increased exposure while price collapsed — the exact opposite of panic behavior.

More importantly, since mid-February, their holdings have remained steady even as XRP fluctuated between $1.21 and $1.52. They did not reduce exposure during volatility. This stability sends a strong signal. It suggests that the investors with the highest conviction are not treating the crash as a reason to exit. Instead, they appear to be positioning for future recovery.

This creates a stronger holder base. But price stability also depends heavily on derivatives positioning.

XRP’s Balanced Leverage Weakens The Biggest Crash Risk

One of the main reasons crypto crashes accelerate is excessive leverage imbalance. When too many traders take the same position, forced liquidations amplify price moves.

Advertisement

Ethereum currently shows this risk clearly. On Binance’s ETH/USDT perpetual contracts, long leverage stands near $976 million compared to $576 million in shorts. This creates heavy downside liquidation risk if the price falls.

ETH Leverage: Coinglass

XRP’s positioning looks very different.

On Binance, XRP’s perpetual contracts show approximately $74.93 million in long leverage and $69.14 million in short leverage. This is almost perfectly balanced, in the same timeframe as ETH.

Liquidation Map
XRP Liquidation Map: Coinglass

This balance is important. It means XRP does not have a large cluster of overleveraged buyers that could be wiped out during a drop. At the same time, it also avoids overcrowded short positioning that could destabilize the price.

Balanced leverage creates a healthier structure. It allows price to move based more on real demand instead of forced liquidations. This healthier positioning is also appearing in institutional flows and technical structure.

Institutional Flows and XRP Price Structure Now Open the Path Toward $1.70

While many major crypto assets experienced weak ETF demand in February, XRP-related investment products continued attracting steady inflows. This shows institutional participation did not collapse during XRP’s decline. There were no major net outflow weeks recorded in XRP-linked investment products

Advertisement

Institutional inflows are important because they represent longer-term capital. Unlike speculative traders, institutions do not usually react to short-term volatility. Their steady participation helps stabilize markets during uncertain periods.

ETF Flows
ETF Flows: SoSo Value

Combined with strong holder behavior and balanced leverage, this strengthens XRP’s recovery foundation. These structural improvements are now aligning with a key technical setup.

On the 8-hour chart, XRP appears to be forming a cup-and-handle pattern. This is a bullish continuation structure that often appears before upward breakouts. The handle formed after XRP corrected about 7% from its recent February 25 high, creating a consolidation zone.

XRP Price Structure
XRP Price Structure: TradingView

This structure now defines the key levels ahead. If XRP holds above $1.38, the bullish structure remains intact. A drop below this level would weaken momentum.

A move below $1.31 would invalidate the bullish pattern completely. On the upside, XRP must first break above $1.42 to confirm the handle breakout. The more important breakout level sits at $1.52, which sits near the neckline of the cup-and-handle pattern.

XRP Price Analysis
XRP Price Analysis: TradingView

If XRP breaks above $1.52, the technical projection points toward approximately $1.71 (the $1.70 zone). In stronger breakout scenarios, the move could extend toward $1.86 depending on breakout strength and where the neckline gets breached.

For now, XRP’s crash may have done something unexpected. It may have made the asset structurally stronger rather than weaker.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Price Structure Keeps 900% Upside Target Active

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR

  • XRP surged 647% from $0.49 to $3.66 after its late 2024 breakout.
  • The token now trades near $1.38 following a 70% pullback from its peak.
  • Analyst Javon Marks said the $15 measured move target remains unchanged.
  • A move to $15 would represent more than 900% upside from current levels.
  • XForceGlobal said the current price action reflects compression rather than weakness.

XRP price has returned to focus after its late 2024 breakout triggered a 647% rally to $3.66 by mid 2025. The asset now trades near $1.38 following a 70% pullback from its peak. Analysts state that the original breakout structure still supports a larger upside move.

XRP Price Structure Keeps $15 Measured Move in Play

Javon Marks stated on X that the “$15 measured move target goes unchanged” despite recent volatility. He based his view on the multi-year triangle breakout that occurred in November 2024.

The XRP price surged from $0.49 to $3.66 after the breakout was confirmed. Marks calculated the target by extending the triangle height from the breakout point. He said the structure still supports a 10x move from current levels. From $1.38, a rise to $15 would mark a gain above 1,000%.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the XRP price has declined by over 38% on a yearly basis. The token also slipped 4.3% in the past 24 hours. However, Marks maintained that price swings do not invalidate the broader breakout setup.

Measured move analysis uses the full height of consolidation patterns. Analysts apply this method after confirmed breakouts. In this case, the late 2024 move remains the reference point.

Analysts Cite Compression Phase After 70% Pullback

Korean Elliott Wave analyst XForceGlobal said, “it’s all coming together” for XRP from a structural view. He pointed to the rally that revisited the prior all-time high zone near $3.66.

He also referenced the retracement back toward the $1 region. According to him, this reset completed two major milestones within the broader wave count. He described the current sideways movement as “compression, not weakness.”

Advertisement

XForceGlobal earlier projected $6 as a conservative Fibonacci extension level. He later referenced $5 and $10 as possible targets within the same wave structure. He stated that short-term volatility does not disrupt the impulsive expansion outlook.

At the same time, XRP has printed five consecutive red monthly candles. This pattern last appeared during the 2016 to 2017 consolidation period.

That earlier stretch preceded a sharp rally in 2017. Current market data also showed over $900 million in realized losses within one week.

Community commentator Archie projected a long-term chart target near $83. He based this outlook on historical breakout extensions and long cycle projections.

Advertisement

An $83 price would imply a multi-trillion-dollar market capitalization. Meanwhile, XRP continues to trade around $1.38 at the time of reporting.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Will crypto market dip as US PPI shows sticky inflation?

Published

on

Will crypto market dip as US PPI shows sticky inflation?

The crypto market is facing new pressure after fresh U.S. inflation data showed that price growth is still stubbornly high, raising concerns about tighter financial conditions.

Summary

  • January PPI beat forecasts, signaling persistent inflation pressures.
  • Bitcoin fell toward $66,000 as rate-cut hopes weakened.
  • Analysts warn of more downside if macro data stays hot.

The January 2026 Producer Price Index report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was released today, Feb. 27. It showed that wholesale inflation was higher than expected, supporting predictions that the Federal Reserve might keep interest rates high for a longer period.

The data arrived at 8:30 a.m. ET and was followed by immediate weakness in equities and digital assets. Bitcoin (BTC) slipped toward the $66,000, while Ethereum (ETH) and major altcoins posted similar declines.

Advertisement

Hot PPI data raises rate fears

The January report showed headline producer prices rising 0.5% month over month, above the 0.3% forecast. On a yearly basis, PPI climbed 2.9%, also exceeding expectations.

Core PPI, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.8% on the month and 3.6% year over year, marking its highest reading in around 10 months. A narrower “super-core” measure increased 0.3% for the third straight month.

Services prices were the main driver. Final demand services jumped 0.8%, the largest gain since July. Trade services margins surged 2.5%, while professional and commercial equipment wholesaling rose 14.4%, a move widely linked to higher import costs tied to tariffs.

Advertisement

In contrast, goods prices fell 0.3%, led by declines in energy and food. Goods outside of those categories did, however, rise by 0.7%, indicating that underlying cost pressures are still very much present. 

It was a clear message for investors. Policymakers are finding it more difficult to defend short-term rate cuts as a result of the services sector’s inflation. 

Markets have already reduced expectations for easing in early 2026, pushing real yields and the U.S. dollar higher. These conditions typically weigh on risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.

Crypto market reaction and short-term outlook

Financial markets responded quickly to the data. Dow futures dropped more than 400 points at one stage, while Nasdaq futures fell over 1%. Crypto followed the same risk-off pattern.

Advertisement

Within hours of the release, Bitcoin declined about 2% to 3% from pre-report levels. Ethereum and major altcoins tracked the move. At the same time, gold moved higher, reflecting renewed demand for traditional safe havens.

Analysts say the report strengthens the case for “higher-for-longer” interest rates. If producer price pressures continue feeding into consumer inflation, liquidity conditions could tighten further, limiting upside for digital assets.

Some strategists warn that a sustained break below key support near $64,000–$66,000 could open the door to deeper losses. Others say that until the next significant data release, such as the February CPI in mid-March, volatility is probably going to stay high. 

There is also a longer-term counterview. Interest in Bitcoin as a hedge may eventually resurface due to ongoing inflation, trade pressures, and fiscal constraints. For now, however, short-term macro signals remain dominant.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Did L2 Fragment Ethereum? – With Yuval Rooz, CEO of Digital Asset, Co-Founder of Canton

Published

on

Did L2 Fragment Ethereum? - With Yuval Rooz, Co-founder &  CEO of Canton Network


Layer 2 was supposed to scale Ethereum.

But what if it fragmented it instead?

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

UK Gambling Regulator Weighs Crypto Payments for Casinos

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR

  • The UK Gambling Commission is reviewing whether licensed casinos can accept cryptocurrency payments.
  • Tim Miller said the regulator will examine a clear path for crypto use in online betting.
  • Companies offering regulated crypto services must obtain FCA authorization under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
  • The commission asked its Industry Forum to study how crypto payments could work within current gambling rules.
  • Research shows crypto searches often direct British gamblers to illegal gambling websites.

The United Kingdom’s Gambling Commission has started formal talks on allowing cryptocurrency payments at licensed online casinos. The regulator confirmed it will assess how digital assets could fit within existing gambling rules. Officials said the review aligns with the country’s incoming crypto regulatory framework led by the Financial Conduct Authority.

UK Gambling Commission Studies Crypto Payment Framework

Tim Miller addressed the Betting and Gaming Council’s annual meeting in London on Thursday. He said the commission wants to examine “the potential path forward” for cryptoasset payments. He explained that the regulator aims to allow crypto as a consumer payment option for licensed gambling in Great Britain. He linked this move to rising consumer interest and regulatory changes. He also confirmed that companies conducting regulated crypto activities must secure FCA authorization under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

He stated that growing appetite from punters prompted the review. He said, “We do now want to start looking at what the potential path forward would be.” He added that crypto could become a consumer payment option for licensed operators. However, he clarified that accepting crypto would not change casino licensing standards. He noted that operators must still pass customer suitability checks under existing rules.

FCA Sets Timeline as UK Gambling Sector Reviews Digital Assets

Miller said he asked the Industry Forum to explore the best route for crypto payments. The advisory group represents workers across the gambling sector. He did not provide a deadline for the review. He said illegal markets research shows crypto searches often lead British gamblers to unlawful websites. He added, “Crypto is one of the two biggest searches that lead British gamblers to illegal sites.”

He explained that allowing regulated crypto payments could help protect consumers. He stated that the commission wants to reduce exposure to illegal platforms. Meanwhile, the Financial Conduct Authority released a final consultation outlining ten proposals for crypto markets. The FCA plans to complete the process in March. It targets full implementation of the new regime by October 2027.

Advertisement

The FCA confirmed that companies must obtain full authorization before October 25, 2027. It stated that the application window will open in September 2026. Crypto asset service providers that miss the deadline will enter transitional rules. Those rules will allow existing products but restrict new offerings. The regulator published the timeline in a document dated January 8.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

S&P 500 index dips as private credit risks escalate

Published

on

S&P 500

The S&P 500 Index retreated by over 0.6% on Friday, continuing a retreat that started on Thursday as market participants reacted to the latest NVIDIA earnings.

Summary

  • The S&P 500 Index retreated by over 0.50% on Friday.
  • Jitters in the booming private credit industry accelerated.
  • The US published a strong producer price index report.

The blue-chip index, which tracks the biggest companies in the United States, dropped to $6,857, down substantially from the year-to-date high of $7,010.

Other stock indices like the Nasdaq 100, Dow Jones, and the Russell 2000 declined by over 1%. 

Advertisement
S&P 500
S&P 500 Index chart | Source: crypto.news

The decline happened as concerns about the $1.8 trillion private credit industry escalated. These concerns started earlier this month after Blue Owl, a company with over $300 billion in assets under management, sent shockwaves in the broader market.

Blue Owl sold a private credit portfolio and announced measures to limit redemption by its investors. This move was an escalation to what happened last year when the company attempted to merge a private and public fund.

The crisis escalated this week after a fund managed by Apollo Asset Management slashed its dividend in a bid to preserve cash as defaults rose. 

As a result, top private credit and equity companies like Blue Owl, Apollo, Ares, and Blackstone continued falling. Blue Owl stock dropped by over 4.3%, bringing its three-month decline to 25%.

Advertisement

Apollo Global Management’s stock dropped by over 7%, while Ares fell by over 6%. Blackstone and KKR stocks also continued falling.

The S&P 500 Index also dropped as odds of a US attack on Iran jumped after Israel’s embassy asked non-essential staff to leave. As a result, airline stocks like United Airlines, Delta Airlines, and American Airlines were among the top laggards in the S&P 500 Index.

Additionally, the index retreated after the US published strong producer price index (PPI) data. 

The report showed that the headline PPI rose by 2.9% in January, while the core PPI moved to 3.6%. These numbers mean that the Federal Reserve may find it difficult to cut interest rates in the coming meetings.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump Plans Cuba Takeover, Iran War Heat Drives Bitcoin Crash

Published

on

Trump Plans Cuba Takeover, Iran War Heat Drives Bitcoin Crash

Bitcoin fell sharply on February 27 as geopolitical tensions intensified, pulling the price back to around $65,200 after several days of attempts to recover toward $70,000. The drop came as US President Donald Trump suggested the possibility of a “friendly takeover” of Cuba, while Washington simultaneously increased its military posture in Israel.

The combined headlines injected fresh uncertainty into global markets. Crypto, which had been stabilizing, reacted quickly.

Trump on Cuba: “Maybe We Will Do a Friendly Takeover”

Speaking earlier today, Trump said the Cuban government is “in big trouble” and “talking with us,” adding that the US could pursue a “friendly takeover.” He framed Cuba as financially desperate and open to negotiation.

Advertisement

The comment follows weeks of mounting pressure. Since returning to office in January 2025, Trump reinstated and expanded maximum pressure policies against Havana. 

In late January 2026, he signed an executive order declaring a national emergency related to Cuba and threatening tariffs on any country supplying oil to the island.

That move effectively created an oil blockade. Cuba relies heavily on Venezuelan and Mexican fuel. When shipments were halted under US pressure, the island faced rolling blackouts, airport fuel shortages, and widespread economic strain.

How the Cuba Crisis Escalated

Tensions intensified further this week after a deadly maritime incident. Cuban forces intercepted a US-registered speedboat near their territorial waters. Four people were killed in the exchange. 

Havana described the group as armed infiltrators. Washington denied involvement but launched investigations.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Trump’s administration briefly allowed limited humanitarian oil flows through private channels. 

However, the broader economic pressure remains in place.

Against this backdrop, the phrase “friendly takeover” carries weight. It likely implies a negotiated political transition under US leverage, not a military invasion. 

Still, the language is sensitive. Cuba has built its identity around resisting US influence for over six decades.

Advertisement

US Military Build-Up in Israel

At the same time, the United States has increased its military presence in Israel amid rising tensions with Iran

Advanced fighter jets and additional assets have been positioned in the region. The State Department also authorized the departure of non-essential diplomatic staff.

Although officials describe the posture as deterrence, markets see rising geopolitical risk. The Middle East and the Caribbean now sit under simultaneous US pressure campaigns.

Bitcoin Reacts to Global Risk

Bitcoin had been attempting to reclaim $70,000 in recent sessions. Instead, it reversed sharply, falling more than 3% in 24 hours. The move suggests traders are reducing risk exposure.

Advertisement

Crypto often reacts to macro uncertainty in two phases. Initially, liquidity tightens and prices drop. Later, if instability persists, some investors rotate into Bitcoin as a hedge.

Bitcoin Crashes Again Amid Geopolitical Concerns. Source: CoinGecko

For now, markets appear to be in the first phase.

With geopolitical tensions expanding on multiple fronts, volatility may remain elevated. Bitcoin’s next move will likely depend on whether diplomatic channels calm the situation — or whether escalation continues.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Barclays Evaluates Blockchain-based Settlement – “The Defiant”

Published

on

Barclays Evaluates Blockchain-based Settlement - "The Defiant"

Barclays is exploring a new platform integrating stablecoins and tokenized deposits.

Barclays is evaluating technology providers for a new platform to integrate stablecoins and tokenized deposits, according to a report from Bloomberg.

The British banking giant is exploring blockchain-based settlement systems in response to growing demand, and could pick a vendor as soon as April, according to people familiar with the matter.

Barclays’ recent activities signify a shift from its previously cautious stance to active investment in blockchain infrastructure. This change aligns with the evolving financial landscape, influenced by regulatory developments like the US GENIUS Act, which established a framework for dollar-backed tokens, and has encouraged institutions to explore blockchain and digital currencies more aggressively.

Advertisement

Moreover, Barclays has joined a bank-led consortium to explore a reserve-backed digital currency using public blockchain technology. This initiative focuses on G7-pegged assets to enhance cross-border settlements, as highlighted by the Financial Times.

Barclays’ potential embrace of blockchain is part of a broader trend among major financial institutions, including JPMorgan and HSBC, who are also investing in digital infrastructure. This strategic direction by Barclays underscores the growing importance of blockchain technology in traditional finance, with stablecoins playing a crucial role in future payment systems.

This article was generated with the assistance of AI workflows.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025