Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Up just 0.2% on $36M loot

Published

on

Up just 0.2% on $36M loot

Since draining Japanese crypto platform UXLINK six months ago (and losing a chunk of the proceeds), the hacker behind the attack has been trying to hit it big on-chain.

It’s not going great.

Blockchain analytics platform Arkham has been tracking the hacker’s trading history, highlighting recent ETH sales which brought them back to breakeven.

But given the market over the past six months, one could argue that breakeven is nothing to be sniffed at.

Advertisement

Read more: UXLINK goes from bad, to worse, to weird after hacker loses stolen tokens

Advertisement

The September attack unfolded in two stages. First, UXLINK’s multi-signature wallet was compromised and drained for $11 million worth of assorted crypto tokens.

Hours later, the project’s token contract, which had also been compromised, minted a billion tokens, with a theoretical dollar value in the nine figures.

The drama didn’t stop there, however. While dumping the UXLINK tokens, and cratering its price as liquidity depleted, the hacker fell for a phishing link, losing half the freshly-minted tokens.

Trading with house money

Since then, the hacker’s trading history shows swaps made mainly between the stablecoin DAI and WETH or WBTC. 

Advertisement

Arkham’s profit and loss (PnL) calculations put the hacker’s cumulative PnL at $83,000 in the green. 

While the gains are small, just 0.2% of the $36.6 million held in the wallets, it’s currently performing better than at any time since the hack. 

PnL has been down-only, aside from brief periods of clawing back close to breakeven. But recent weeks have seen a sudden recovery from an all-time low of -$4.8 million in late February.

Read more: Venus Protocol hacker lost $4.7M after nine months of planning

Easy come, easy go

Hackers trading stolen funds have had mixed results in recent years.

Advertisement

Members of North Korea’s Lazarus Group traded the proceeds of 2024’s $50 million Radiant Capital attack, ending up $40 million in profit by last summer.

In October last year, a hacker who previously stole 400 bitcoins from a Coinbase user “panic sold” ether which they had bought with the ill-gotten gains.

During two crypto market crashes, a week apart, they realized a total of $10 million in losses.

Read more: Outdated algorithm caused $650M excess losses on Hyperliquid, report

A slightly more unsettling incident saw Lazarus-linked addresses liquidated for $500,000 on Hyperliquid in late 2024.

Advertisement

While some were happy to see the bad guys get wiped out, others were concerned the activity was testing for a potential future exploit.

Also on Hyperliquid, a wallet linked to the $30 million zKasino “rug pull” in April 2024 suffered a $27 million liquidation a year later.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Over $3b in crypto longs at risk as Bitcoin and Ethereum hover near key levels

Published

on

Microsoft stock plunges 11% as Bitcoin traders seek refuge amid broader tech selloff

Over $3b in leveraged Bitcoin and Ethereum longs sit just above key support levels, with Coinglass data showing a liquidation cascade risk in either direction.

Leveraged long positions across Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) are sitting on a knife’s edge, with more than $3 billion in combined exposure at risk of forced liquidation if prices slip to critical support levels, according to data published by Coinglass on March 20.

For Bitcoin, the figures are stark. If BTC falls below $66,827, the cumulative long liquidation intensity across major centralized exchanges would reach $1.878 billion. That would represent one of the more significant cascading liquidation events in recent months, as stop-losses and margin calls trigger a wave of automatic selling that could further accelerate any downward move. On the upside, a break above $73,757 would flip the pressure onto short sellers, with $1.062 billion in short positions vulnerable to a squeeze.

Advertisement

Ethereum presents a similarly precarious picture. A drop below $2,029 would trigger $1.204 billion in long liquidations on mainstream CEXs, while a rally above $2,240 would put $881 million in short positions at risk of being unwound.

The data arrives at a sensitive moment for both assets. Bitcoin has been trading in a narrow range around $69,700 following a recent dip that attracted bearish interest. Notably, open interest data tracked by Coinglass showed that during yesterday’s price decline, BTC’s open interest actually increased as prices fell — a sign that short sellers were actively adding positions rather than covering. The subsequent rebound has done little to change the OI picture, suggesting the recovery lacks conviction from new buyers and that the market remains range-bound rather than in the early stages of a trend reversal.

Ethereum has likewise struggled to find direction, hovering near $2,130 with traders watching the $2,029 floor closely. With ETH already under moderate selling pressure on the day, the proximity to that liquidation threshold is not lost on market participants.

Advertisement

Liquidation maps of this kind serve as a window into the market’s structural vulnerabilities. When large clusters of leveraged longs accumulate just above key support levels, they can create a self-reinforcing dynamic: a price drop triggers liquidations, which push prices lower still, triggering more liquidations in turn. This “liquidation cascade” effect has been behind some of crypto’s most violent short-term price dislocations.

For traders navigating the current environment, the message from the data is clear: the market is coiled tightly around these levels, and a decisive move in either direction could trigger outsized volatility. With macro headwinds persisting — including rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a risk-off mood in traditional equity markets, where the Nasdaq fell 0.88% in pre-market trading — the path of least resistance for crypto in the near term remains highly uncertain.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto, Fintechs Race to Own Stablecoin Settlement Rails

Published

on

Crypto, Fintechs Race to Own Stablecoin Settlement Rails

Stablecoin issuers and fintech-linked firms are launching payment-focused blockchains as they try to control more of the settlement infrastructure behind US digital-dollar transfers.

Some stablecoin issuers and fintech-linked companies are building a new wave of blockchain networks designed for institutional payment flows rather than the broader token issuance and smart-contract activity associated with general-purpose layer-1 networks, according to Delphi Digital.

These include stablecoin giant Tether-backed Plasma, a public L1 network optimized for cross-border USDt (USDT) transactions, which launched on mainnet on Sept. 25, 2025 after it raised $24 million in February. A month later, stablecoin issuer Circle launched the public testnet for Arc, which it describes as an open L1 blockchain purpose-built for stablecoin finance.

The developments add to signs of a structural shift from generic blockchain infrastructure toward payment-focused networks, as companies compete to control the rails underpinning stablecoin settlement, which Delphi Digital described as one of crypto’s clearest real-world use cases.

Advertisement

Fintech companies have also joined the payments infrastructure push, seeking to carve out a market share of the growing stablecoin payments sector.

Source: Delphi Digital

Owning the payment rails is becoming “strategically important,” Ran Goldi, senior vice president of payments and network at digital asset custody platform Fireblocks, told Cointelegraph. He said:

“Instead of relying on external networks and paying fees to ecosystems like Ethereum, companies are looking to capture more of that value themselves by building or controlling the settlement layer.”

For payment companies, owning the underlying rails means they avoid being “taxed” for the mint and burn operations of the stablecoin, added Goldi.

Fintech companies are also joining the stablecoin chain wars

Tempo said Wednesday that its mainnet is live, describing the network as a merchant-focused settlement layer built for high-throughput stablecoin transactions. The project says it is incubated by Paradigm and Stripe.

Source: Tempo

In October 2024, Stripe acquired stablecoin infrastructure startup Birdge for $1.1 billion. In June 2025, it acquired crypto wallet infrastructure provider Privy and later bought billing platform Metronome on Jan. 14.

Delphi Digital said those deals positioned Stripe to control more of the issuance, wallet and billing layers around stablecoin payments alongside settlement infrastructure.

Advertisement

Stablecoin payment infrastructure is increasingly seen as a new “revenue layer,” positioning entities controlling the end-to-end payment workflow to capture fees on every transaction, according to Alvin Kan, chief operating officer at Bitget Wallet.

“As settlement costs at the protocol level trend lower, value capture shifts to the orchestration layer around the rail: compliance, FX conversion, wallet infrastructure, on- and off-ramps, local payout connectivity and merchant integration,” he told Cointelegraph.

Related: Stablecoins to replace old FX rails, but off-ramps remain a chokepoint

Controlling the settlement infrastructure behind stablecoins is the next battleground among crypto and fintech firms, according to Irina Chuchkina, chief growth officer of Wallet in Telegram. She said:

Advertisement

“Stablecoin payment rails could become the defining revenue driver of this cycle, for the same reason Visa and Mastercard became indispensable: not because they issued currency, but because they owned the pipes.”

Companies building settlement rails interoperable with agentic artificial intelligence stand to “capture a disproportionate share of the value flowing through these networks,” she added.