Connect with us

Crypto World

Vietnam Draft Rules Set Sights on 0.1% Tax on Crypto Transfers

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Vietnam is moving to formalize how crypto transactions are taxed and regulated, signaling a push toward a tightly controlled but economically significant digital asset market. A draft circular circulated by the Ministry of Finance would impose a 0.1% personal income tax on the value of each crypto transfer executed through licensed service providers, aligning digital asset activity with the country’s securities trading framework. While transfers and trading would be VAT-exempt, the plan taxes turnover, applying the levy to investors regardless of residency. For institutions, crypto-related income would be taxed at 20% corporate rate, calculated after deducting purchase costs and related expenses. The measures also set a high bar for exchanges, including a 10 trillion dong charter capital threshold and a 49% foreign-ownership cap, reflecting a cautious approach to market infrastructure.

The draft circular, released for public consultation, also formalizes a definition of crypto assets as digital assets issued, stored or transferred using cryptographic or similar technologies. It arrives as Vietnam accelerates a broader, five-year pilot program for a regulated crypto-asset market that began in September 2025. By October 2025, officials indicated no companies had applied to participate in the pilot, underscoring barriers related to capital requirements and eligibility criteria. Separately, authorities have begun opening licensing windows for digital asset trading platforms, signaling that the regulatory framework could start to take shape in early 2026.

As the policy discussion unfolds, Vietnam’s approach appears to be balancing tax revenue opportunities with stringent oversight of who can operate and how financial flows are monitored. The Ministry of Finance’s draft circulates alongside ongoing regulatory experiments and a push to bring crypto activity into formal channels, while the broader ecosystem weighs the implications for retail investors, institutions, and technology providers. The Hanoi Times highlighted the 0.1% PIT as the centerpiece of the tax framework, noting that the tax would be levied on transfers through licensed providers and would mirror the existing stock-trading levy in form and function. The article also points to a clear distinction between value-added tax treatment and turnover taxes, a nuance that could influence how exchanges structure their operations and how tax authorities monitor cross-border activity.

Vietnam formally defines crypto assets

In what appears to be a step toward regulatory clarity, authorities described crypto assets as digital instruments that rely on cryptographic or analogous technologies to issue, store and verify transfers. This definitional move is a precursor to stricter licensing criteria and more predictable tax treatment, which in turn could attract legitimate players while screening out speculative, non-compliant activity. The proposed regime sets a higher capital bar for exchanges than many industries require for traditional banks, signaling an intent to ensure resilience and risk controls in markets that are closely linked to global capital flows.

Advertisement

Under the proposed rules, operators seeking to run a digital asset exchange would need substantial capital, with charter requirements set at 10 trillion dong (about $408 million at current exchange rates). Foreign ownership would be allowed but capped at 49% of an exchange’s equity, limiting influence from outside the country while still enabling international participation. Such thresholds underscore the government’s preference for domestic guardianship of critical financial infrastructure, even as it permits foreign-backed ventures to participate under strict caps and regulatory oversight.

The broader regulatory arc has been visible since Vietnam launched a five-year crypto market pilot in September 2025, a landmark shift intended to test how a regulated ecosystem could coexist with a growing domestic economy. By early October, authorities acknowledged that no companies had yet submitted applications to join the pilot, a reflection of the substantial entry hurdles and careful qualification criteria in play. This admission came alongside reports that the pilot’s scope would eventually be complemented by formal licensing for trading platforms, a move that would bring crypto activity under formal government supervision and pave the way for standardized reporting and consumer protections.

Vietnam opens licensing for crypto exchanges

In the lag time between policy signals and practical rollout, Vietnam began accepting applications for exchange licenses, marking a tangible step toward operationalizing a regulated crypto market. The State Securities Commission of Vietnam (SSC) stated that applications would be accepted starting January 20, 2026, framing the licensing process as a deliberate, multi-year effort to bring crypto activities into a formal regulatory framework. The liquidity and risk-management requirements implied by the licensing window are designed to channel legitimate market participants into a controlled environment, potentially reducing fraud and improving transparency for investors and policymakers alike.

Key takeaways

  • The Ministry of Finance’s draft circular would impose a 0.1% personal income tax on the value of each crypto transfer conducted through licensed providers, aligning crypto transfers with the country’s stock-trading levy.
  • Crypto transfers and trading would be exempt from value-added tax, while turnover-based taxation would apply to investors regardless of residency status.
  • Institutional investors earning income from crypto transfers would face a 20% corporate income tax on profits after deducting costs and expenses.
  • Exchanges would face a high capital requirement of 10 trillion dong (roughly $408 million) and foreign ownership would be limited to 49% of equity.
  • A formal definition of crypto assets would anchor regulatory rules, helping separate compliant activity from informal or illicit use cases.
  • The country has launched a five-year pilot for a regulated crypto market (Sept 2025) with licensing for exchanges anticipated to begin in 2026, although initial participation had not materialized by Oct 2025.

Market context: The policy comes as many jurisdictions reassess how to regulate crypto markets, balancing tax revenue with consumer protection and financial stability. Vietnam’s approach leans toward rigorous control, reflecting a global trend toward centralized oversight while still signaling potential for regulated participation by international players under strict conditions.

Why it matters

The package signals a deliberate attempt to integrate crypto activity into the formal economy, with taxes and licensing acting as primary levers to enhance oversight. For retail investors, the PIT on transfers through licensed providers creates a clear tax path that will influence trading behavior and cost considerations. Institutions face a defined tax regime and a high bar for market entry, potentially filtering participants to those willing to navigate substantial capital prerequisites and regulatory compliance obligations.

Advertisement

From a market infrastructure perspective, the 10 trillion dong charter capital threshold and 49% foreign-ownership cap set a high ceiling for domestic exchanges, aiming to safeguard the financial system while still inviting foreign expertise. The definitional clarity around crypto assets helps align Vietnamese rules with broader financial standards, reducing ambiguity for developers, exchanges, and custodians seeking to establish local operations. Observers will watch how this framework interacts with ongoing pilot programs and whether the regulatory appetite broadens to accommodate more players over time.

For policymakers, the balance between revenue collection, investor protection, and market growth is delicate. Vietnam’s approach suggests a patient, data-driven trajectory: tax structures that incentivize compliance, capital requirements that deter low-capital risk, and licensing that creates an auditable, auditable market foundation. If successful, the model could influence neighboring economies contemplating similar regulated pathways for digital assets, especially in a region where adoption is uneven and regulatory certainty remains a key obstacle for institutional participation.

What to watch next

  • January 20, 2026: Applications open for digital asset exchange licenses, establishing a formal entry point for market participants.
  • Public responses to the draft circular: Feedback from domestic and international stakeholders could shape final text and practical implementation.
  • Details on how PIT and corporate tax will be administered across different crypto products and services, including calculation methodologies and reporting requirements.
  • Progress of the five-year pilot: uptake, participant eligibility, and any regulatory adjustments arising from early pilot findings.
  • Any updates to foreign ownership rules or capital thresholds as exchanges begin building their local presence under clarified regulatory conditions.

Sources & verification

  • Draft circular on crypto taxation and licensing circulated by Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance for public consultation.
  • The Hanoi Times report outlining the 0.1% personal income tax on crypto transfers through licensed providers.
  • Five-year crypto market pilot launched in September 2025, with a status update stating no applicants as of October 6, 2025.
  • State Securities Commission of Vietnam (SSC) statement on the licensing window for digital asset exchanges and the January 20, 2026 start date.
  • Coverage of Vietnam opening licensing for crypto exchanges and related regulatory developments referenced in contemporaneous reporting.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

EU Moves to Ban Russia’s Digital Ruble and Crypto Services in New Sanctions

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Key insights

  • EU blocks Russia’s digital ruble and crypto services to close alternative payment channels.
  • Over 40 shadow fleet tankers targeted to enforce oil price cap and energy restrictions.
  • Banks, third-country suppliers, and military contractors face expanded financial sanctions.

Why is the EU now targeting crypto and the digital ruble?

The European Union has unveiled its proposed 20th sanctions package against Russia, expanding restrictions beyond traditional finance into digital assets. The measures aim to weaken Moscow’s ability to fund its war in Ukraine by blocking new financial channels that emerged after earlier banking sanctions.

Announced by EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, the plan bans the use of Russia’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) — the digital ruble — inside the bloc. It also prohibits European businesses and institutions from interacting with Russian crypto-asset service providers.

Advertisement

As Russia faced growing limits on international banking access, it increasingly turned to alternative settlement tools, including cryptocurrencies and the digital ruble, to facilitate trade and cross-border payments. The EU now intends to close what officials see as a financial workaround.

Advertisement

The package further proposes removing additional Russian and affiliated banks from the SWIFT messaging network and placing full transaction bans on institutions accused of providing liquidity to the Kremlin.

Could these measures actually disrupt war financing?

EU officials believe so. By cutting both traditional and digital payment rails, the bloc aims to make financing military operations significantly more costly.

The sanctions also target companies in third-party countries suspected of helping Russia obtain electronics and industrial components for weapons production. About 40 firms linked to military supply chains would face full sanctions.

New export restrictions will apply to essential industrial materials, including chemicals, rubber products, metalworking tools, and laboratory equipment — all items that can support defense manufacturing.

Advertisement

What about Russia’s oil trade and the “shadow fleet”?

The EU is also tightening enforcement of energy sanctions. More than 40 oil tankers believed to be part of Russia’s so-called shadow fleet — aging vessels used to sell oil above the G7 price cap — would be blacklisted.

These ships would lose access to EU ports and maritime services. The proposal also bans maintenance services for Russian LNG tankers and icebreakers.

Additionally, the bloc plans to activate its Anti-Circumvention Tool against countries suspected of acting as trade transit hubs. Companies providing insurance or technical services to sanctioned Russian oil shipments could face heavy penalties.

The sanctions list will also expand to include individuals linked to war crimes, propaganda operations, and the deportation of Ukrainian children.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Caught Between CME Gaps and New Macro Lows: Analysis

Published

on

Bitcoin Caught Between CME Gaps and New Macro Lows: Analysis

Bitcoin (BTC) failed to hold $69,000 as the weekend began amid predictions of fresh macro lows next.

Key points:

  • Bitcoin faces a lack of acceptance above $69,000, while traders see new lows to come.

  • Analysis says that the rebound into the weekend was nothing more than a “relief rally.”

  • Two CME futures gaps provide potential targets for BTC price upside.

BTC price bottom “not in,” analysis warns

Data from TradingView showed BTC price action dropping more than $4,000 versus the daily open.

BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

With the old 2021 all-time high increasingly turning to resistance, already wary traders were in no mood for relief.

“TLDR: The $BTC bottom, is not in. My priority right now is capital preservation,” Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, warned X followers the day prior. 

Advertisement

“If you’re thinking, ‘We’re so back,’ we’re not. There is literally no evidence of that yet.”

BTC/USDT order-book liquidity data with whale orders. Source: Keith Alan/X

Alan described the 2021 $69,000 highs as “important” within what he called the ongoing “relief rally.”

“$60k was a gift yesterday, but there’s a high probability that lower is likely before the Bull Market returns,” he continued.

Zooming out, trader and analyst Rekt Capital also had reason to believe that the worst of the bearish BTC price move was not over.

“Whenever Bitcoin peaks in its Bull Market in Q4 of the Post-Halving year… It tends to produce a multi-month Relief Rally from the Macro Triangle Base before breaking down from the Triangle to transition into Bearish Acceleration,” he wrote on X, comparing BTC/USD with the 2022 bear market.

“This is the 4th consecutive cycle that this historical tendency has continued. And history suggests there’s more downside to come.”

BTC/USD one-month chart. Source: Rekt Capital/X

Bitcoin bulls bet on CME gap fills

Saturday’s retracement, meanwhile, left a new potential “gap” in CME Group’s Bitcoin futures market.

Related: Bitcoin beats FTX, COVID-19 crash with record dive below 200-day trend line

Advertisement

A classic short-term price magnet, the gap joined another left at $84,000, and both were now of interest to traders eyeing a broader market relief move.

“Today: correction day. Tomorrow: back up again towards the CME gap. Next week: continuation to $75k+,” crypto trader, analyst and entrepreneur Michaël van de Poppe forecast.

Advertisement
BTC/USDT four-hour chart. Source: Michaël van de Poppe/X

Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin adoption company JAN3, included the higher CME gap as one of two questions that “every financial analyst should be asking themselves.”

The other topic revolved around the ability of large-scale corporate buyers to add BTC to their treasuries at current 15-month lows.

“I believe the answers are not for long and very soon,” he concluded.