Key Takeaways

• On March 26, XRP’s Sharpe Ratio shifted into positive territory, indicating that current returns are outpacing associated risks
• Large holder inflows have maintained an average of $9 million daily over 30 days, marking the most sustained accumulation period since the April–July 2025 window
• Futures open interest jumped 14.8% within 24 hours on March 26, though recurring long position liquidations reveal derivatives market instability
• Following a breakdown from an ascending triangle formation, XRP has declined 13.63% across 10 days, with critical support zones at $1.27 and $1.11 under watch
• Price projections from various analysts and forecasting models span from $5.35 by 2030 to optimistic multi-year targets between $17 and $27

Ripple’s native token is currently changing hands between $1.33 and $1.40, hovering near recent lows following a challenging period of downward momentum. The digital asset has shed 13.63% of its value over the last 10 days after failing to hold support within a bullish ascending triangle formation.

Despite this bearish price movement, certain blockchain metrics are beginning to reveal encouraging trends developing under the hood.

The risk-adjusted return metric for XRP crossed into positive territory on March 26. With the 30-day average return registering at 0.00063 and a Sharpe Ratio of 0.0267, crypto analyst Arab Chain noted that this reading implies “current returns still exceed risk” and indicates a “gradual positive rebalancing” for the digital asset. The analyst cautioned that if this indicator reverses back into negative values, it could foreshadow renewed volatility.

Large wallet activity has also intensified. The 30-day moving average for XRP whale-sized inflows now stands at $9 million daily. This accumulation trend has persisted since February 27 — representing the longest uninterrupted streak since the April through July 2025 timeframe. That previous accumulation cycle culminated with XRP reaching its all-time peak of $3.65 on July 18, 2025.

Derivatives Market Under Pressure

Crypto analyst Amr Taha highlighted that the 24-hour change in open interest reached 14.8% on March 26, representing the highest reading since March 4. This indicates fresh trader engagement in the market. However, the underlying data also reveals a pattern of heavy long positioning being systematically eliminated.

Liquidation events exceeding $2.5 million occurred on March 18, followed by $2.45 million on March 21 and another $2.15 million on March 26. These consecutive liquidation waves suggest a vulnerable futures environment, where speculative positions continue to be forced out during brief volatility spikes.

Should present market dynamics persist, market observers anticipate possible retests of the $1.27 support level and the yearly low around $1.11.

Extended Price Forecasts Show Wide Range

Analyst Egrag Crypto has identified a macro-scale ascending triangle pattern for XRP with Fibonacci-based targets at $8, $17, and $27, describing the ongoing pullback as a “retest phase” that represents “normal and necessary” price behavior. Fellow analyst Dark Defender projects XRP could potentially climb into the $5 territory.

CoinCodex algorithmic forecasts estimate XRP reaching $1.64 by the close of 2026, advancing to $5.35 by 2030, $8.06 by 2040, and ultimately $13.42 by 2050.

The potential passage of cryptocurrency regulatory clarity legislation is also mentioned as a possible price catalyst, considering XRP’s documented sensitivity to regulatory developments.

XRP whale-tier inflows have maintained positive territory for more than 30 days, with the rolling 30-day average positioned at $9 million per day as of late March 2026.

Key Points

• Orlando-based Goliath Ventures has initiated Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in Florida’s Southern District
• Company founder Christopher Delgado faces federal wire fraud and money laundering accusations following his February 24 arrest
• Federal prosecutors claim the operation functioned as a $328 million Ponzi scheme targeting more than 2,000 victims
• Investigators say investor capital financed early participant payouts, high-end real estate purchases, and extravagant lifestyle expenses
• A civil class-action complaint targets JPMorgan Chase for allegedly facilitating questionable financial transactions

An Orlando-based cryptocurrency enterprise, Goliath Ventures, has formally submitted Chapter 11 bankruptcy documents to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Florida’s Southern District.

This legal action follows the February 24 detention of the company’s founder and chief executive, Christopher Delgado, who now confronts serious charges including wire fraud and money laundering.

The firm previously operated under the name Gen-Z Venture Firm prior to its corporate rebrand.

Federal investigators contend that Delgado orchestrated the enterprise as a fraudulent Ponzi operation spanning from January 2023 to January 2026.

Participants were promised that their investments would yield consistent monthly profits via cryptocurrency liquidity pool strategies. Prosecutors assert these representations were entirely false.

According to charging documents, the collected capital was actually diverted to satisfy obligations to earlier participants, reimburse select investors their original deposits, and bankroll expensive corporate events alongside luxury vacation expenses.

Federal authorities estimate Goliath secured no less than $328 million from victims through these deceptive assurances.

Delgado also allegedly acquired four high-end residential properties, with individual valuations ranging from $1.15 million to $8.5 million.

Should prosecutors secure convictions on all counts, Delgado could receive a maximum sentence of 30 years in federal custody.

Thousands of Victims Identified Nationwide

The purported fraudulent operation affected more than 2,000 investment participants throughout the United States.

Gregory Wilson appears among those suffering the most substantial financial harm, with documented losses totaling $8.74 million. John Euliano reportedly lost approximately $1.28 million, based on bankruptcy documentation.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection enables an organization to reorganize its financial structure while operating under judicial oversight. This process temporarily halts withdrawal requests and establishes a framework for creditors to potentially recover funds rather than forcing immediate asset liquidation.

Major Financial Institutions Face Civil Litigation

A distinct class-action legal complaint was lodged against JPMorgan Chase earlier this month.

The civil filing accuses the banking institution of overlooking suspicious financial activity connected to Goliath Ventures’ operations.

Plaintiffs further contend that JPMorgan’s commercial relationship with Coinbase, America’s predominant cryptocurrency trading platform, facilitated the scheme’s expansion to its alleged massive scale.

Neither JPMorgan nor Coinbase currently faces criminal prosecution. The lawsuit represents a civil action initiated by investors pursuing monetary compensation.

The bankruptcy case continues to advance through the Southern District of Florida judicial system.

Google is preparing to support a large data center project in Texas that Anthropic has leased, as major AI companies race to secure more computing power in the United States. 

The project links a fast-growing AI developer with one of its biggest cloud partners at a time when Anthropic is also fighting a legal battle with the Pentagon.

The Texas project is operated by Nexus Data Centers and could cost more than $5 billion in its first phase, according to the Financial Times. The report said Google is expected to provide construction loans, while a group of banks is competing to arrange more financing by mid-year.

Anthropic recently signed a lease for the 2,800-acre campus, and construction is already underway. Early-stage debt financing came from Eagle Point, while the site is expected to deliver about 500 megawatts of capacity by late 2026, with room to expand to 7.7 gigawatts later.

The project adds to a broader partnership between Google and Anthropic. Anthropic said in October 2025 that it would expand its use of Google Cloud TPUs and services, with plans to access up to 1 million TPUs for training and serving Claude models.

Google’s support for the Texas buildout shows how the competition for AI infrastructure now goes beyond chips and cloud contracts. The planned campus also sits near major gas pipelines, which could let the operator use on-site gas turbines instead of relying only on the public grid.

At the same time, Anthropic won temporary relief in court. A federal judge in San Francisco blocked the Pentagon from branding the company a “supply-chain risk” while the case moves forward, saying the government’s action appeared punitive rather than security-driven.

Judge Rita Lin also said the government acted in an “arbitrary” way, according to reporting from the Associated Press and other outlets. The ruling does not force the Pentagon to keep using Anthropic’s tools, but it stops broader punitive steps for now.

Military dispute remains unresolved

The legal fight followed a dispute over military use of Anthropic’s AI. The Pentagon clash began after Anthropic refused to loosen safeguards related to surveillance and autonomous weapons.

US military units used Anthropic’s Claude AI during strikes on Iran. That left Anthropic at the center of two fast-moving stories at once: the race to build more AI infrastructure and the debate over how governments should use advanced AI tools.

Peter Van Valkenburgh has warned that the crypto industry may lose a rare chance to secure clear legal protections in the United States. 

His comments came as the CLARITY Act remained stuck in the Senate, leaving the sector exposed to future policy changes if Congress does not turn current guidance into law.

Van Valkenburgh, the executive director of Coin Center, said on Friday that the aim of passing the CLARITY Act is not to trust the current administration, but to “bind the next one.” He argued that the bill matters because it would place developer protections into law rather than leave them dependent on policy choices that can change after an election.

He also warned that a world without those protections could become “grim” for crypto developers. In his view, the absence of legislation would leave the sector exposed to “prosecutorial discretion, political fashion, and fear” instead of clear statutory rules.

The CLARITY Act seeks to create federal rules for digital assets and define when tokens fall under securities or commodities law. The measure is part of a wider push to settle long-running questions over which agency should oversee large parts of the crypto market.

The bill has stalled in the Senate after banks, crypto firms, and lawmakers failed to agree on key terms. One of the main disputes has centered on whether crypto firms and intermediaries should be allowed to offer stablecoin rewards and yield-like products.

In January, the Senate draft would prohibit firms from paying interest to users solely for holding stablecoins. At the same time, the draft would still allow some rewards tied to activities such as payments or loyalty programs.

That issue has become one of the main reasons the crypto market structure bill has struggled to advance. Banks argued such products could pull deposits from the insured banking system, while crypto firms pushed back and said tighter limits would hurt competition.

Current policy may not survive a change in government

The House of Representatives passed its version of the CLARITY Act in July 2025, but Senate talks later lost momentum. Some industry participants fear that, without legislation, crypto firms may have to rely on regulatory guidance that a future administration could reverse.

Van Valkenburgh linked that risk to the years after Gary Gensler led the SEC, whose final day as chair was January 20, 2025. Since then, the SEC has taken a different approach, including a new Crypto Task Force under Commissioner Hester Peirce, but Van Valkenburgh said friendly discretion alone is not enough to secure lasting rules for the industry.

Key Highlights

• A collaboration between xStocks and Fundrise will transform the VCX fund into a blockchain-based token called VCXx.
• VCX provides ownership stakes in prominent private firms including SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Databricks.
• The on-chain tokenized stock sector recently surpassed $1 billion in aggregate market value.
• Following its NYSE debut, VCX stock climbed from $31 to $575 before retreating to $173 amid short-seller criticism from Citron Research.
• The xStocks platform has facilitated over $25 billion worth of trades and serves more than 100,000 individual token holders worldwide.

Digital securities platform xStocks has revealed a strategic collaboration with investment firm Fundrise to transform the Fundrise Innovation Fund into a blockchain-based asset. The tokenized version, designated as VCXx, will debut on xStocks’ marketplace in the near future.

The Fundrise Innovation Fund operates on the New York Stock Exchange with the VCX ticker symbol. This closed-end investment vehicle provides shareholders with stakes in private companies representing the cutting edge of technology innovation, including SpaceX, [[LINK_START_0]]OpenAI[[LINK_END_0]], Anthropic, and Databricks.

VCX commenced NYSE trading on March 19 at an initial price point of $31 per share. Intense investor interest drove valuations to a peak of $575 per share just days following the public market launch.

The stock experienced significant volatility after short-seller firm Citron Research issued a critical analysis on Thursday. The report highlighted that Fundrise Advisors LLC settled SEC allegations in 2023 concerning undisclosed paid promotions and questioned whether the company might be compensating social media influencers to market VCX shares.

By week’s end, VCX closed at $173, representing a 34% plunge on Friday alone, followed by an additional 5.9% decrease during extended trading hours. Fundrise Chief Executive Ben Miller responded to CNBC, characterizing the criticism as a baseless attack and standing by the fund’s investment strategy.

Understanding the Token Structure

Through the tokenization of VCX, xStocks and Fundrise aim to democratize investment opportunities in private market assets for international investors. Traditionally, gaining exposure to late-stage private enterprises like those within VCX’s portfolio required institutional status or significant personal wealth.

The VCXx digital asset is engineered for compatibility across multiple wallet systems, blockchain protocols, and exchange platforms. Additionally, it enables sophisticated applications such as collateral posting and borrowing within decentralized finance ecosystems.

xStocks operates on technology infrastructure managed by Payward, which serves as the corporate entity behind cryptocurrency exchange Kraken. The service currently offers access to more than 100 tokenized equities and ETFs, having processed cumulative transaction volumes exceeding $25 billion across its global user base of over 100,000 holders.

Payward recently unveiled a collaborative initiative with Nasdaq focused on bridging conventional equity markets with blockchain-based infrastructure, complementing this VCX tokenization effort.

Digital Stocks Reach $1 Billion Threshold

This xStocks-Fundrise initiative arrives as the tokenized securities sector achieves a significant benchmark. Analytics from RWA.xyz indicate that the combined value of blockchain-based stocks surpassed $1 billion earlier this month.

Market concentration remains notable, with two platforms controlling the majority. Ondo commands approximately 58% of market share, while xStocks represents roughly 24% of the sector, based on RWA.xyz data.

A March 2025 analysis by Foresight Ventures observed that the market is coalescing around these established players, citing regulatory compliance requirements, liquidity network effects, and varying tokenization approaches as determining factors.

The VCXx token is scheduled to launch on the xStocks platform in the coming days, according to current projections.

Canada has moved to restrict how political groups receive campaign funds, with a new bill that targets cryptocurrency donations. 

The proposal forms part of a wider push to reduce foreign interference risks and tighten rules around election financing before the next federal vote.

Canada’s federal government has proposed a full ban on cryptocurrency donations to political parties and third parties involved in elections. The measure appears in the Strong and Free Elections Act, which had its first reading in the House of Commons on Thursday.

The bill would also ban donations made through money orders and prepaid cards. The government said these payment methods can make contributions harder to trace and may create room for anonymous funding during election periods.

Steven MacKinnon, the government House leader and sponsor of the bill, said the proposed changes aim to protect election integrity. In a statement on X, he said, “With the introduction of the Strong and Free Elections Act, new investments to counter foreign threats and stronger government coordination, we are acting to ensure our elections remain free, fair and secure at all times.”

The proposed amendments would update the Canada Elections Act and require political entities to reject banned forms of payment. The government has framed the bill as part of a broader effort to close gaps that foreign actors could use to influence political activity.

Moreover, this is not Canada’s first attempt to stop crypto donations in politics. A similar proposal appeared in 2024 under then public safety minister Dominic LeBlanc, but it failed to move beyond the second reading and later expired.

Crypto political donations have remained legal in Canada since 2019. Elections Canada has treated them as property donations, but concerns about tracing contributors have continued. In 2024, Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault recommended a full ban, writing that crypto “poses challenges in identifying a contributor.”

Bill also sets penalties and wider election rules

If Parliament passes the bill, political groups would need to return, destroy or transfer prohibited contributions to the chief electoral officer. The proposed penalties include fines of up to twice the amount donated, plus $25,000 for individuals and $100,000 for corporations.

The bill also expands rules on deepfakes that imitate election candidates to mislead voters. Canada’s move came on the same day the UK announced’ plans for a moratorium on crypto political donations, showing that concern over digital election risks now extends beyond one country.

Failing to pass the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, could leave the door open for a future less industry-friendly US government to crack down on crypto again, Peter Van Valkenburgh the executive director of advocacy group Coin Center says.

In an X post on Friday, Van Valkenburgh argued that rejecting developer protections in legislation like the CLARITY Act and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act in favor of “short-term business interests” and the “continued goodwill of those in charge” could lead to a “grim” future for the industry.

“The point of passing CLARITY is not to trust this administration. It is to bind the next one,” he said, adding that “A world without CLARITY’s statutory protections for developers is a world governed by prosecutorial discretion, political fashion, and fear.”

The CLARITY Act stalled in the Senate after banks, crypto firms, and lawmakers failed to agree on key provisions — including whether to allow stablecoin yields. The bill covers a range of measures, including frameworks for registering crypto intermediaries, regulating digital assets and classifying tokens

During the previous US administration, former SEC Chair Gary Gensler drew heavy criticism from the crypto industry for allegedly crafting policy through enforcement actions and legal settlements with crypto firms rather than formal rulemaking.

Nothing set in stone without legislation

Van Valkenburgh also predicts that, without legislative clarification, a future administration’s Department of Justice could ramp up prosecutions of privacy-tool developers as unlicensed money transmitters, and that existing regulatory interpretive guidance could be revoked.

Related: Crypto investor sentiment will rise once CLARITY Act is passed: Bessent

Since Gensler resigned on Jan. 20, 2025, crypto proponents have seen a regulatory shift by the SEC, including the dismissal of several long-running enforcement actions against crypto firms and friendlier guidance on how the agency will treat crypto.

“If we lose this moment because we thought we’d have a bit more revenue and a bit more latitude under the short-term friendly discretion of the current administration, then we lose our way,” Van Valkenburgh said.

“We fail to stand up for the kind of transparency, neutrality, and openness that crypto stands for. And worse, we will have helped tie the noose ourselves, handing it to the future officials who will be only too happy to pull it tight.”

Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work